<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WE Blog &#187; Randy Scholfield</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/author/rscholfield/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:03:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ideas for boosting energy policy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/ideas-for-boosting-energy-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/ideas-for-boosting-energy-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Kansas Energy Council has released 15 preliminary policy recommendations for the 2009 legislative session, including encouraging “policies that promote declines in greenhouse-gas emissions, not policies that merely shift emissions within or between regions,” and reducing the maximum speed limit from 70 to 65 mph on Kansas highways. The council will hold the second of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/turbine6.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-10109" title="turbine6" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/turbine6-95x150.jpg" alt="" width="95" height="150" /></a>The Kansas Energy Council has released 15 preliminary policy recommendations for the 2009 legislative session, including encouraging “policies that promote declines in greenhouse-gas emissions, not policies that merely shift emissions within or between regions,” and reducing the maximum speed limit from 70 to 65 mph on Kansas highways. The council will hold the second of two public comment hearings from 9 a.m. to noon Sept. 30 at Wichita State University’s Marcus Welcome Center, 21st Street and Mike Oatman Drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/ideas-for-boosting-energy-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative columnists turn on McCain-Palin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/conservative-columnists-turn-on-mccain-palin/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/conservative-columnists-turn-on-mccain-palin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Presidential race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several mainstream conservative columnists are turning on the McCain-Palin ticket, both for Sarah Palin’s lack of qualifications to be president and John McCain’s cynical strategy of smears and lies. There is always some shading of truth in a campaign, on both sides. But we might have reached a tipping point at which there is bipartisan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/palinmccain.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-10062" title="APTOPIX MCCain Veepstakes Palin" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/palinmccain-150x109.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="109" /></a>Several mainstream conservative columnists are <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/16/conservatives-turn-on-mcc_n_126749.html">turning</a> on the McCain-Palin ticket, both for Sarah Palin’s lack of qualifications to be president and John McCain’s cynical strategy of smears and lies. There is always some shading of truth in a campaign, on both sides. But we might have reached a tipping point at which there is bipartisan agreement that McCain has violated some basic standards of truth and fairness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/conservative-columnists-turn-on-mccain-palin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>200</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rove says McCain went too far?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/rove-says-mccain-went-too-far/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/rove-says-mccain-went-too-far/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Presidential race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Karl Rove, the GOP’s master of dirty tricks, said on Fox News that John McCain had gone “one step too far” in some of his recent ads and in “sort of attributing to Obama things that are, you know, beyond the ‘100 percent truth’ test.” If Rove’s conscience is bothered by an attack ad, then [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/rove21.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-10037" title="rove21" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/rove21-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Karl Rove, the GOP’s master of dirty tricks, <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/14/campaign.wrap/index.html ">said</a> on Fox News that John McCain had gone “one step too far” in some of his recent ads and in “sort of attributing to Obama things that are, you know, beyond the ‘100 percent truth’ test.” If Rove’s conscience is bothered by an attack ad, then you know it’s beyond the pale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/rove-says-mccain-went-too-far/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin the victim (cont.)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/sarah-palin-the-victim-cont/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/sarah-palin-the-victim-cont/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Presidential race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Saddleback Church pastor Rick Warren said Sarah Palin talked with him last week, asking him “to send her some Bible verses on how do you deal with the unfair, unjust attacks and the mean-spirited criticism that comes in.”
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/palinright.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-10002" title="Palin GOP Convention" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/palinright-90x150.jpg" alt="" width="90" height="150" /></a> Saddleback Church pastor Rick Warren <a href="http://thepage.time.com/2008/09/11/rick-warren-says-palin-sought-him-out-for-guidance/">said </a>Sarah Palin talked with him last week, asking him “to send her some Bible verses on how do you deal with the unfair, unjust attacks and the mean-spirited criticism that comes in.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/sarah-palin-the-victim-cont/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>315</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin gives a C-plus performance so far</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/palin-gives-a-c-plus-performance-so-far/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/palin-gives-a-c-plus-performance-so-far/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Presidential race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sarah Palin did OK in the first part of her first major interview — with Charlie Gibson of ABC News — although she spent a lot of time repeating talking points instead of exhibiting nuance or a firm grasp of topics. In the interview segments that aired Thursday, John McCain’s running mate came off as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/palingibson.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-9963" title="palingibson" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/palingibson-150x110.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="110" /></a>Sarah Palin did OK in the first part of her first major <a href="http://www.kansas.com/514/story/526539.html">interview</a> — with Charlie Gibson of ABC News — although she spent a lot of time repeating talking points instead of exhibiting nuance or a firm grasp of topics. In the interview segments that aired Thursday, John McCain’s running mate came off as well-rehearsed but at times out of her depth. She obviously didn’t know what the Bush doctrine was and tried to bluff her way through. Gibson helped her out by defining it as pre-emptive war. She declared herself ready to be president, if need be, but her C-student answers and deer-in-the-headlights look on some questions weren’t reassuring. More of the interview <a href="http://">airs</a> today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/palin-gives-a-c-plus-performance-so-far/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>339</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You can depend on Kansas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/you-can-depend-on-kansas/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/you-can-depend-on-kansas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kansas news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ It’s probably good to be wary of generalizations about people and places. But there’s some truth to a new study that identifies personality traits of U.S. states.
Kansas was No. 5 in “conscientiousness,” according to the listing. And we scored high in values of discipline, duty and faith.
OK, maybe we’re not the life of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/ksgreetings1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-9957" title="ksgreetings1" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/ksgreetings1-150x96.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="96" /></a> It’s probably good to be wary of generalizations about people and places. But there’s some truth to a new <a href="http://www.kansas.com/news/story/525742.html">study </a>that identifies personality traits of U.S. states.</p>
<p>Kansas was No. 5 in “conscientiousness,” according to the listing. And we scored high in values of discipline, duty and faith.</p>
<p>OK, maybe we’re not the life of the party. But Kansas deserves credit for being a place of hardworking, down-to-earth, dependable folks who will do what they say they’re going to do.<br />
Still, we might want to loosen up a bit: Kansas is No. 38 in “openness” — traits such as intellectual curiosity and artistic creativity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/you-can-depend-on-kansas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: ‘Don’t mock the Constitution’</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/obama-%e2%80%98don%e2%80%99t-mock-the-constitution%e2%80%99/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/obama-%e2%80%98don%e2%80%99t-mock-the-constitution%e2%80%99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Presidential race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Barack Obama this week pushed back hard on Sarah Palin’s attack line at the GOP convention that “al-Qaida terrorists still plot to inflict catastrophic harm on America and he’s worried that someone won’t read them their rights.”
It was an easy, cynical applause line. But Obama called out Palin on substance, telling a rally that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/constitution.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-9951" title="constitution" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/constitution-150x98.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="98" /></a> Barack Obama this week <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/09/08/obama_to_palin_dont_mock_the_c.html">pushed back </a>hard on Sarah Palin’s attack line at the GOP convention that “al-Qaida terrorists still plot to inflict catastrophic harm on America and he’s worried that someone won’t read them their rights.”</p>
<p>It was an easy, cynical applause line. But Obama called out Palin on substance, telling a rally that the rights of captured suspects were “the foundation of Anglo-American law,” and arguing that the principle “says very simply: If the government grabs you, then you have the right to at least ask, ‘Why was I grabbed?’ And say, ‘Maybe you’ve got the wrong person.’”</p>
<p>He went on: “The reason that you have this principle is not to be soft on terrorism. It’s because that’s who we are. That’s what we’re protecting. Don’t mock the Constitution. Don’t make fun of it. Don’t suggest that it’s not American to abide by what the Founding Fathers set up. It’s worked pretty well for over 200 years.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/obama-%e2%80%98don%e2%80%99t-mock-the-constitution%e2%80%99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>90</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shift focus of terror response</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/shift-focus-of-terror-response/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/shift-focus-of-terror-response/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seven years after Islamic terrorists flew planes into the twin towers and the Pentagon, killing thousands of Americans, al-Qaida reportedly is regrouping in the lawless border region of Afghanistan and planning new attacks, and the resurgent Taliban once again controls most of the countryside, our editorial today noted. It’s time to rethink this country’s anti-terror [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/afghan911.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-9940" title="Afghanistan" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/afghan911-150x100.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a>Seven years after Islamic terrorists flew planes into the twin towers and the Pentagon, killing thousands of Americans, al-Qaida reportedly is regrouping in the lawless border region of Afghanistan and planning new attacks, and the resurgent Taliban once again controls most of the countryside, our <a href="http://www.kansas.com/opinion/editorials/story/525411.html">editorial</a> today noted. It’s time to rethink this country’s anti-terror strategy. President Bush announced this week that, because of the success of the military surge and decreasing violence in Iraq, he will bring home about 8,000 U.S. troops from Iraq by February — about 5 percent of U.S. troop strength there — and redeploy about 4,500 combat troops to Afghanistan. If anything, the troop shift is not soon enough or large enough. That’s because the real central front in the war on terror is in Afghanistan and Pakistan, not Iraq. For too long, U.S. forces have been bogged down and stretched thin in Iraq, which has proved to be a distraction from the task of hunting down and capturing or killing Osama bin Laden and dismantling the terror network that actually attacked us on Sept. 11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/shift-focus-of-terror-response/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain’s sleazy new attack ad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/mccain%e2%80%99s-sleazy-new-attack-ad/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/mccain%e2%80%99s-sleazy-new-attack-ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Presidential race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Once upon a time, John McCain pledged to run an honorable, respectful campaign. This week he launched a new attack ad (no link will be provided) that accuses Barack Obama of wanting to teach kindergartners about sex before they learn to read.
The Illinois bill in question was about “age-appropriate” K-12 sex education that warned [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/mccainlookingright5.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-9937" title="McCain Lobbyist 2008" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/mccainlookingright5-150x99.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="99" /></a> Once upon a time, John McCain pledged to run an honorable, respectful campaign. This week he launched a new attack ad (no link will be provided) that accuses Barack Obama of wanting to teach kindergartners about sex before they learn to read.</p>
<p>The Illinois bill in question was about “age-appropriate” K-12 sex education that warned kids about inappropriate touching and sex predators.</p>
<p>A McClatchy newspaper fact-check of the McCain ad <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/staff/margaret_talev/story/52169.html">calls </a>it “out of bounds” and “deliberately misleading.”<br />
Time columnist Joe Klein <a href="http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/09/apology_not_accepted.html">calls </a>it “one of the sleaziest ads I’ve ever seen in presidential politics.”<br />
Meanwhile, McCain and Sarah Palin continue to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/09/AR2008090903727.html">claim </a>that Palin said “thanks but no thanks” to the “Bridge to Nowhere,” even after that claim has been thoroughly debunked in the media as a falsehood.<br />
McCain is clearly ready to say anything to win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/mccain%e2%80%99s-sleazy-new-attack-ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>340</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will youth or race determine election?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/will-youth-or-race-determine-election/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/will-youth-or-race-determine-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Presidential race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sedgwick County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wichita government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ At a panel discussion at the University of Kansas’ School of Journalism, Democratic media adviser Raymond Strother said that race could be a larger factor than people think in the presidential election. He said past elections show that voters are influenced by race more than they are willing to admit.
But political pundit Walter Shapiro [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/votersyoung.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-9917" title="votersyoung" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/votersyoung-150x112.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="112" /></a> At a panel <a href="http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2008/sep/07/panelists_predict_age_voters_race_will_determine_e/">discussion </a>at the University of Kansas’ School of Journalism, Democratic media adviser Raymond Strother said that race could be a larger factor than people think in the presidential election. He said past elections show that voters are influenced by race more than they are willing to admit.</p>
<p>But political pundit Walter Shapiro of Salon.com said that youth turnout, which Barack Obama tapped in the primaries, could play the crucial role.</p>
<p>“Every day an Archie Bunker is leaving the planet and a new 18-year-old, who grew up in an America that preached the virtues of tolerance and is surrounded by tolerance, is able to vote,” he said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/will-youth-or-race-determine-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>98</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Only one green candidate?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/only-one-green-candidate/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/only-one-green-candidate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 11:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ John McCain’s pick of Sarah Palin may have endeared him to hockey moms, but it’s taken the GOP ticket out of the running in the green sweepstakes, argues New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman.
By choosing Palin, who supports drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (McCain has opposed it, although he’s now reconsidering) and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/mccain4.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-9899" title="mccain4" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/mccain4-150x116.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="116" /></a> John McCain’s pick of Sarah Palin may have endeared him to hockey moms, but it’s taken the GOP ticket out of the running in the green sweepstakes, <a href="http://www.kansas.com/205/story/520720.html">argues </a>New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman.</p>
<p>By choosing Palin, who supports drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (McCain has opposed it, although he’s now reconsidering) and doesn’t believe in human-caused global warming (McCain does), McCain “has completed his makeover from the greenest Republican to run for president to just another representative of Big Oil.”</p>
<p>And Friedman notes that for all of McCain’s stump talk about boosting clean renewables, he has studiously avoided supporting eight different votes to extend crucial tax credits for wind and solar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/only-one-green-candidate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roberts&#8217; intelligence role needs scrutiny</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/roberts-intelligence-role-needs-scrutiny/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/roberts-intelligence-role-needs-scrutiny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas delegation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrat Jim Slattery, in a debate with Sen. Pat Roberts (in photo) at the Kansas State Fair Saturday, attacked Roberts on his role as then-chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee in the intel failures leading up to the Iraq war — a conflict that Slattery said had overstretched the military and played into Iran’s hands. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/robertsdebate.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-9883" title="Senate Race" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/robertsdebate-125x150.jpg" alt="" width="125" height="150" /></a>Democrat Jim Slattery, in a <a href="http://www.kansas.com/news/story/520974.html">debate</a> with Sen. Pat Roberts (in photo) at the Kansas State Fair Saturday, attacked Roberts on his role as then-chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee in the intel failures leading up to the Iraq war — a conflict that Slattery said had overstretched the military and played into Iran’s hands. “There has to be accountability when our political leaders make these kinds of terrible mistakes,” Slattery said.<br />
Roberts gave a flippant response: Everyone was wrong about the intelligence, he said. (Not true — it’s just that the ones who raised questions and conflicting intel weren’t listened to.)<br />
“Jim, you wouldn’t even know about this information unless the fact that I released it,” Roberts said of a long-delayed committee report on how intelligence was used to take America to war.<br />
Slattery is right to demand a fuller accounting of Roberts’ central oversight role in this disastrous intelligence failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/roberts-intelligence-role-needs-scrutiny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP of two minds on conservation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/gop-of-two-minds-on-conservation/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/gop-of-two-minds-on-conservation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 11:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Rep. Todd Tiahrt, R-Goddard, was one of many Republican conventiongoers to take shots at Barack Obama’s comment that motorists could save gas by keeping their car tires properly inflated. The idea is endorsed by every energy expert in the world, but Republican leaders apparently can’t resist making jokes about it.
Tiahrt told a group at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/tirepressure1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-9874" title="tirepressure1" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/tirepressure1-150x101.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="101" /></a> Rep. Todd Tiahrt, R-Goddard, was one of many Republican conventiongoers to take shots at Barack Obama’s comment that motorists could save gas by keeping their car tires properly inflated. The idea is endorsed by every energy expert in the world, but Republican leaders apparently can’t resist making jokes about it.</p>
<p>Tiahrt <a href="http://www.kansas.com/224/story/517550.html ">told </a>a group at the GOP convention last week, “The price of gasoline hit $4 and we were told to inflate our tires.” But he later acknowledged that, yes, inflating tires works: “We can all conserve . . . and we can inflate our tires. That’s part of it, too.”</p>
<p>John McCain, too, was against tire inflation before he was for it.</p>
<p>Make up your minds, Republicans: Do you want Americans to keep their tires inflated or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/gop-of-two-minds-on-conservation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The GOP’s white-bread convention</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/the-gop%e2%80%99s-white-bread-convention/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/the-gop%e2%80%99s-white-bread-convention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 11:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Presidential race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ One of the more striking aspects of the GOP convention this week was how monotone the crowd scenes were — a sea of white Caucasian faces.
Yes, the networks picked out individual African-American or Hispanic faces here and there, but the broader crowd scans told the story: Diversity isn’t exactly a GOP value.
Contrast that with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/convention.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-9853" title="Republican Convention" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/convention-150x108.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="108" /></a> One of the more striking aspects of the GOP convention this week was how monotone the crowd scenes were — a sea of white Caucasian faces.</p>
<p>Yes, the networks picked out individual African-American or Hispanic faces here and there, but the broader crowd scans told the story: Diversity isn’t exactly a GOP value.</p>
<p>Contrast that with the Democratic convention crowd, which showed people of every hue and ethnicity. The visuals were telling about the parties’ very different base demographics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/the-gop%e2%80%99s-white-bread-convention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>292</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hooray for middle school recess!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/hooray-for-middle-school-recess/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/hooray-for-middle-school-recess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Wichita elementary schools and teachers have done a mixed job of giving all kids recess time. Guidelines call for at least 20 minutes every day, but some teachers keep in their students from recess to cram in more instruction time or punish them.
Is it any wonder that kids get antsy and out of control? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/recess.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-9751" title="recess" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/recess-132x150.jpg" alt="" width="132" height="150" /></a> Wichita elementary schools and teachers have done a mixed job of giving all kids recess time. Guidelines call for at least 20 minutes every day, but some teachers keep in their students from recess to cram in more instruction time or punish them.</p>
<p>Is it any wonder that kids get antsy and out of control? They need to run and play and burn off excess energy.</p>
<p>The same holds for middle school kids. So it’s encouraging that some Wichita middle school principals are <a href="http://www.kansas.com/news/story/509464.html">bringing back</a> recess.</p>
<p>“Even prisoners get yard time,” said Truesdell principal Jennifer Sinclair. She is reinstating lunchtime recess at the middle school this fall in the form of 20-minute breaks in which students walk laps or do other activities.</p>
<p>OK, it does sounds a lot like a prison recess, but at least kids are getting some fresh air and exercise. They need it to perform at their best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/hooray-for-middle-school-recess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Downtown gets a new champion</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/downtown-gets-a-new-champion/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/downtown-gets-a-new-champion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 11:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wichita]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ It’s good to hear that the Wichita Downtown Development Corp. finally has found a new president — Jeffrey Fluhr, currently executive director of the Baton Rouge, La., Downtown Development District.
Fluhr comes with high praise from his Baton Rouge colleagues, who say he was a key player in revitalizing their downtown business district and waterfront [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/fluhr.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-9742" title="fluhr" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/fluhr-150x90.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="90" /></a> It’s good to hear that the Wichita Downtown Development Corp. finally has <a href="http://www.kansas.com/101/story/509448.html">found </a>a new president — Jeffrey Fluhr, currently executive director of the Baton Rouge, La., Downtown Development District.</p>
<p>Fluhr comes with high praise from his Baton Rouge colleagues, who say he was a key player in revitalizing their downtown business district and waterfront — and that he sees similar challenges in Wichita’s riverfront and arena district.</p>
<p>We hope he hits the ground running as an effective champion for downtown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/09/downtown-gets-a-new-champion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats hit back on patriotism</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/democrats-hit-back-on-patriotism/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/democrats-hit-back-on-patriotism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Presidential race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Among other effective notes in Barack Obama’s convention address, he took on directly the GOP’s attacks on the Democratic Party’s patriotism, saying:
“The times are too serious, the stakes are too high for this same partisan playbook. So let us agree that patriotism has no party. I love this country, and so do you, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/flagamerican1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-9724" title="flagamerican1" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/flagamerican1.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="112" /></a> Among other effective notes in Barack Obama’s convention address, he took on directly the GOP’s attacks on the Democratic Party’s patriotism, saying:</p>
<p>“The times are too serious, the stakes are too high for this same partisan playbook. So let us agree that patriotism has no party. I love this country, and so do you, and so does John McCain. The men and women who serve in our battlefields may be Democrats and Republicans and independents, but they have fought together and bled together and some died together under the same proud flag. They have not served a Red America or a Blue America — they have served the United States of America.”</p>
<p>He’s not going to let McCain get away with questioning his patriotism.</p>
<p>As this <a href="http://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/28/kerry-hits-it-home/?hp">blog </a>notes, John Kerry — in his strong speech, which didn’t get as much attention as it deserved — also said important things about the meaning of patriotism, and he challenged those who, four years ago, turned his Vietnam protest into something un-American:</p>
<p>“Years ago when we protested a war, people would weigh in against us, saying, ‘My country right or wrong.’ Our answer? Absolutely, my country right or wrong. When right, keep it right. When wrong, make it right. Sometimes loving your country demands you must tell the truth to power.”</p>
<p>Amen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/democrats-hit-back-on-patriotism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>275</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain&#8217;s surprise pick for veep</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/mccains-surprise-pick-for-veep/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/mccains-surprise-pick-for-veep/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Presidential race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John McCain has chosen Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his vice presidential running mate. Sarah who? Most people won’t know a thing about the little-known first-term governor. That said, she is an outgoing, telegenic rising GOP star, a reformer with a Western individualistic streak and maverick image, like McCain.
At the very least, this is an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/palin.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-9717" title="MCCain Veepstakes Palin" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/palin-107x150.jpg" alt="" width="107" height="150" /></a>John McCain has <a href="http://www.kansas.com/news/updates/story/510398.html">chosen</a> Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his vice presidential running mate. Sarah who? Most people won’t know a thing about the little-known first-term governor. That said, she is an outgoing, telegenic rising GOP star, a reformer with a Western individualistic streak and maverick image, like McCain.<br />
At the very least, this is an interesting, surprising choice that will get people talking and position McCain as being for change and against status quo Washington. It also appears intended to appeal to women, including disaffected Hillary Clinton supporters.<br />
The most obvious question about this veep pick, especially for a candidate of McCain’s age: Is Palin, age 44 (three years younger than Barack Obama), ready to be president?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/mccains-surprise-pick-for-veep/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>920</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s mile-high expectations</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/obamas-mile-high-expectations/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/obamas-mile-high-expectations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Presidential race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama gives his much-anticipated acceptance speech tonight, and his biggest challenge might be meeting mile-high expectations.
Obama reportedly is modeling his speech on three previous ones: JFK’s in 1960, Ronald Reagan’s in 1980 and Bill Clinton’s in 1992.
He will have an oversized stage and oversized audience of 75,000. The stakes are high: If he rises [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/obamadnc1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-9695" title="Obama 2008 Democratic Convention" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/obamadnc1-99x150.jpg" alt="" width="99" height="150" /></a>Barack Obama gives his much-anticipated acceptance speech tonight, and his biggest challenge might be meeting mile-high expectations.<br />
Obama <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12899.html">reportedly</a> is modeling his speech on three previous ones: JFK’s in 1960, Ronald Reagan’s in 1980 and Bill Clinton’s in 1992.<br />
He will have an oversized stage and oversized audience of 75,000. The stakes are high: If he rises to the occasion, it could cement his status as the new leader of the Democratic Party and give him fresh momentum heading out of the convention. If he fumbles, Republicans will be all over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/obamas-mile-high-expectations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>110</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Broadview’s Halloween is a treat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/broadview%e2%80%99s-halloween-is-a-treat/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/broadview%e2%80%99s-halloween-is-a-treat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wichita events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Now this is scary: the idea of a Halloween without the elaborate sights and sounds of Broadview Avenue in College Hill.
For more than a quarter century, residents of the 100 block of North Broadview have transformed their street into a Halloween extravaganza for kids, with streets festooned with lights and elaborate yard decorations and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/trickortreat.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-9661" title="trickortreat" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/trickortreat-150x99.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="99" /></a> Now this is scary: the <a href="http://www.kansas.com/holidays/story/505417.html">idea </a>of a Halloween without the elaborate sights and sounds of Broadview Avenue in College Hill.</p>
<p>For more than a quarter century, residents of the 100 block of North Broadview have transformed their street into a Halloween extravaganza for kids, with streets festooned with lights and elaborate yard decorations and spooky sound effects. It’s a must-see experience.</p>
<p>But the event has grown so large in recent years — an estimated 3,500 people visited in 2007 — that it’s become a safety concern, and police say about $1,800 is needed to help pay for barricades and officers to work the event.</p>
<p>This is a wonderful neighborhood tradition that has become a community tradition. It’s well worth saving.<br />
Let’s hope city officials and College Hill leaders work something out that will both keep the event going and enhance the safety of participants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/broadview%e2%80%99s-halloween-is-a-treat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michelle Obama&#8217;s all-American speech</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/michelle-obamas-all-american-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/michelle-obamas-all-american-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Presidential race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michelle Obama’s uplifting, poised speech to the Democratic convention Monday night was terrific, and should silence GOP critics still trying to paint her as an America-hating radical.
Instead, she came off as an all-American Horatio Alger story, someone who rose from a working-class background on the south side of Chicago to the pinnacle of success by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/obamafamily.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-9649" title="APTOPIX Democratic Convention" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/obamafamily-150x108.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="108" /></a>Michelle Obama’s uplifting, poised <a href="http://www.kansas.com/514/story/506889.html ">speech</a> to the Democratic convention Monday night was terrific, and should silence GOP critics still trying to paint her as an America-hating radical.<br />
Instead, she came off as an all-American Horatio Alger story, someone who rose from a working-class background on the south side of Chicago to the pinnacle of success by adherence to old-fashioned values of hard work and faith and family. It’s a story even Obama’s conservative opponents should admire.<br />
She helped show the human side of Barack, too, with a touching account of how he drove her and their newborn daughter home from the hospital, nervously moving along at a snail’s pace and looking in the rearview mirror. And the Obama kids were adorable when they took the stage.<br />
What’s not to like about this family? The Republicans will have a hard time making Michelle Obama a liability after Monday night, or calling the Obamas “elitists.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/michelle-obamas-all-american-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>124</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kansas should get smart on home wind</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/kansas-should-get-smart-on-home-wind/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/kansas-should-get-smart-on-home-wind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ At a recent western Kansas meeting to promote wind energy, Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., remarked that he’s considering installing a small wind generator at his Topeka home.
“I want to do it,” he said. “But I don’t want to do it stupid.”
If Brownback wants a smart way to do home wind in Kansas, then he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/turbine5.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-9595" title="turbine5" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/turbine5-95x150.jpg" alt="" width="95" height="150" /></a> At a recent western Kansas meeting to promote wind energy, Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., <a href="http://www.kansas.com/news/state/story/496113.html">remarked </a>that he’s considering installing a small wind generator at his Topeka home.</p>
<p>“I want to do it,” he said. “But I don’t want to do it stupid.”</p>
<p>If Brownback wants a smart way to do home wind in Kansas, then he should support a net metering law, which allows residential wind users to sell their excess energy back to the utility and makes residential wind much more economically feasible.</p>
<p>Kansas is one of only six states without some kind of residential net metering for wind. And we’re supposed to be a leader in wind power?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/kansas-should-get-smart-on-home-wind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teachers locked and loaded for school?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/teachers-locked-and-loaded-for-school/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/teachers-locked-and-loaded-for-school/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ A small school district in Texas has become the first in the nation to approve teachers and staff carrying concealed firearms. Teachers with pistols — what a great learning environment for kids.
The policy change is intended to thwart school shootings, such as the one that occurred Thursday at a school in Tennessee.
But as a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/gunpointingright7.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-9578" title="gunpointingright7" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/gunpointingright7-150x112.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="112" /></a> A small school district in Texas has become the first in the nation to <a href="http://www.kansas.com/news/nation_world/story/496878.html">approve </a>teachers and staff carrying concealed firearms. Teachers with pistols — what a great learning environment for kids.</p>
<p>The policy change is intended to thwart school shootings, such as the <a href="http://www.kansas.com/503/story/501561.html">one </a>that occurred Thursday at a school in Tennessee.</p>
<p>But as a Dallas Morning News <a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/editorials/stories/DN-schoolguns_21edi.ART.State.Edition1.4dfcaea.html">editorial </a>argued, the district is courting disaster: “Injecting firearms into a school setting opens the door to tragic but avoidable accidents. And there are no certain safeguards to prevent an angry student — or teacher — from getting hold of a gun that was carried into the classroom.<br />
“Parents depend on educators to provide a safe learning environment for their children. Allowing teachers to be armed and potentially dangerous is a frightening prospect.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/teachers-locked-and-loaded-for-school/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>353</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sound and fury in college debate</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/sound-and-fury-in-college-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/sound-and-fury-in-college-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my Friday column, I leap into the debate about a screaming, obscenity-laced confrontation between two debate coaches that ended up with one of them, assistant professor William Shanahan of Fort Hays State, dropping his pants, bending over and mooning his opponent with exposed underwear.
The shout-down happened at a tournament at Wichita State University earlier [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my Friday <a href="http://www.kansas.com/203/story/502237.html">column</a>, I leap into the debate about a screaming, obscenity-laced confrontation between two debate coaches that ended up with one of them, assistant professor William Shanahan of Fort Hays State, dropping his pants, bending over and mooning his opponent with exposed underwear.</p>
<p>The shout-down happened at a tournament at Wichita State University earlier this year, and a video clip ended up on YouTube this month, where it quickly became a hit.</p>
<p>It seemed to me a pretty pathetic spectacle, and in keeping with the creeping lack of civility and restraint in our public discourse.</p>
<p>On Friday, Fort Hays State <a href="http://www.kansas.com/457/story/503133.html ">fired </a>Shanahan over the incident. University president Edward Hammond said in a written statement, “Everyone has the right to freedom of speech, but these actions are not acceptable for someone who is representing our university.”</p>
<p>Shanahan told an interviewer: “Obviously it got out of control, but to be honest I thought I was in a safe house. I thought I was part of a community that handled its problems internally and that recognized the dangers of exposing ourselves — no pun intended — to the rest of the country. It is so difficult as a nonparticipant to understand what is going on in the debate round.”</p>
<p>Maybe that’s part of the problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/sound-and-fury-in-college-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How will Iraq deal affect race?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/how-will-iraq-deal-affect-race/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/how-will-iraq-deal-affect-race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Scholfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iraq and the United States reportedly have finalized an agreement that would withdraw most U.S. troops by the end of 2011. President Bush is expected to approve the agreement.
This is a very encouraging sign that the Iraq war debacle and its mounting costs might finally be coming to an end — at least there’s some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/ricezebari.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-9567" title="Mideast Iraq" src="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/files/ricezebari-150x120.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="120" /></a>Iraq and the United States reportedly have finalized an <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB121925351447057223-lMyQjAxMDI4MTI5MDIyNTAzWj.html ">agreement</a> that would withdraw most U.S. troops by the end of 2011. President Bush is expected to approve the agreement.<br />
This is a very encouraging sign that the Iraq war debacle and its mounting costs might finally be coming to an end — at least there’s some light at the end of the tunnel.<br />
“We have to let go, and we’re not reluctant to do that,” said Gen. David Petraeus. “And the Iraqis are not reluctant to take control.”<br />
How will this development affect the presidential race? Both John McCain and Barack Obama are claiming vindication from the remarkable turn of events in Iraq, which seem to buttress both Obama’s call for a withdrawal timetable and McCain’s claims about the success of the surge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/how-will-iraq-deal-affect-race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
