Daily Archives: Sept. 1, 2012

Pro-con: Did Romney make convincing case in speech?

Mitt Romney needed to make a convincing case for new leadership in America: his leadership. In accepting the Republican nomination for president Thursday night, he did just that – and then some. Romney spoke directly to the millions of voters who were genuinely filled with “fresh excitement” by President Obama’s election four years ago – and who are now sorely disillusioned by his non-leadership. “‘Hope and change’ had a powerful appeal,” Romney noted – but “there’s something wrong … when the best feeling you had was the day you voted for him.” Indeed. It was Romney himself who gave voters fresh reason to regain the hope they’d lost: “The time has come to turn the page,” he said. “Now is the time to restore the promise of America.” Sure, the commentators and pro-Obama media were busy picking nits in Romney’s words, just as they’ve done for months. But it was Mitt Romney up there accepting the nomination – defiantly. – New York Post

Mitt Romney took his turn at blasting and belittling Barack Obama on Thursday night, working too hard on twisting “hope and change” into a weapon rather than offering ideas to woo the disappointed to his side. In his speech accepting the GOP nomination for the presidency, Romney tried to cozy up to those who once backed the current president and now feel disaffected and are hurting financially. Choose me, he said, and let me get the unemployed to work and end the divisiveness that tears at our nation. But Romney, in his workmanlike speech, never presented a convincing case for how he would solve the nation’s steep challenges. More troubling: the misstatements, omissions and deceit. Romney promised no higher taxes on the middle class, overlooking the tax breaks middle-class families experienced during Obama’s tenure. While he praised immigrants, he neglected to mention his position favoring self-deportation and against the DREAM Act. – Kansas City Star

No need to drive to Topeka to watch court work

A welcome window onto justice opened wide this week in Kansas, one that will help Kansans better understand, scrutinize and trust their justice system. As of Monday, oral arguments before the court can be seen as well as heard online, both via live, streaming video and later via the archive at www.kscourts. org. The high court has offered live audio streaming of arguments since 2004, but it expands the experience to see the attorneys argue their cases and handle justices’ questions. The cameras especially served the keen public interest in the long-running legal fight over a proposed coal-fired power plant near Holcomb, which was the subject of oral arguments Friday. The ability to watch one of the state’s appellate courts do its work live online – something only a dozen other states offer – also will help inform further legislative debates over Gov. Sam Brownback’s proposal to give him more say in who sits on those courts. Now, the Legislature needs to get in step with the majority of states and start streaming video of its activities.