Democratic pollsters Douglas Schoen and Patrick Caddell wrote a Washington Post commentary making the provocative suggestion that President Obama announce he won’t seek re-election. “If the president goes down the re-election road, we are guaranteed two years of political gridlock at a time when we can ill afford it,” they wrote. “But by explicitly saying he will be a one-term president, Obama can deliver on his central campaign promise of 2008, draining the poison from our culture of polarization and ending the resentment and division that have eroded our national identity and common purpose.” They argued unconvincingly that such a decision would not turn Obama into a lame duck but “would grant him much greater leverage with Republicans.”
As “don’t touch my junk” has joined “don’t Tase me, bro” in the American lexicon in recent days, the public reaction to the Transportation Security Administration’s new “enhanced pat-down” has been loud and negative. But consider the alternatives, including death. “Groin checks or not, tight security is what we need now, unless you want another angry al-Qaida kid with plastic explosives in his tighty whities sitting next to you on the way to Miami,” wrote New York Daily News columnist Joanna Molloy. “Hey, you don’t want to get checked, don’t fly. I can’t imagine most TSA agents enjoy zapping you or feeling around your privates. They don’t want to touch your junk. They just want it to arrive safely at its destination.” TSA Director John Pistole told a Senate committee Wednesday that the full-body scans and invasive pat-downs — used if fliers refuse the scan or set off a metal detector — are necessary to fight terrorism.
Kansas Attorney General-elect Derek Schmidt says he’ll add Kansas to the states challenging the health reform law within days of taking office in January, likely by joining the federal lawsuit in Florida over the law’s mandate to buy insurance. The Wall Street Journal editorial board cheered on Kansas and the other states where newly elected leaders plan to join the legal fight. The editorial argued: “The more states that join the Florida suit, the more the judiciary will appreciate how widespread the legal and popular opposition is to Obamacare’s federal intrusion on state powers and individual rights.”