“I don’t think I can recall in recent political history a serial public vow that was so flagrantly and cynically renounced,” Victor David Hanson wrote in National Review about President Obama’s pledge for an open debate on health care reform. Democratic leaders are conducting the final negotiations between the House and Senate reform bills behind closed doors. Liberals are also upset; Julie Menin wrote on Huffington Post that the closed meeting “only allows lobbyists to barter and trade the bill into an even worse state.”
Health care reform appears headed for passage, but that won’t be the end of the fight for opponents. Many GOP lawmakers and some legal scholars believe that the proposed requirement that all Americans have health insurance, or have to pay a penalty, is unconstitutional, and they hope the U.S. Supreme Court will say so, the Washington Post reported. “In the history of this country, the federal government has never required every American to enter into a contract with a private company,” said Randy Barnett, a professor of constitutional law at Georgetown University Law Center. But Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., argued: “We have looked at this question seriously and concluded that the penalty is constitutional. And those who study constitutional law as a line of work have drawn that same conclusion.” Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the law school at the University of California at Irvine, also contends that “Congress clearly has the legal authority to require individuals to have health insurance.”
Here is another reason why school districts such as Wichita have contingency funds, and why they are reluctant to spend them down, as some anti-tax groups are urging: The state doesn’t honor its funding commitments. For the third consecutive month, the state is delaying $200 million in aid payments to public schools. As a result, districts that don’t have contingency funds are struggling to meet payroll, and state officials expect that nearly 100 districts will be forced to violate cash-management laws to pay their own bills.
Apparently the state’s budget problems are so bad that it has no choice but to make pound-foolish cuts. Still, it doesn’t make much financial sense to cut state funding for home- and community-based services to the elderly when it likely will force more elderly into expensive nursing homes. The state also is losing about $1.37 million in federal money by not paying the state’s $625,000 share of matching funds, making the cut even more costly.