Nearly two-thirds of Americans want the federal government to regulate the release of greenhouse gases from sources such as power plants, cars and factories, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll. But when it comes to the science behind global warming, those surveyed split sharply along partisan lines. Only 20 percent of Republicans think most scientists agree that global warming in happening, compared with 55 percent of Democrats. And 58 percent of Republican put little or no faith in what scientists say about the environment, while only 23 percent of Democrats have such doubts.
Registered?
Commenting on WE Blog now requires you to be a Kansas.com member. Use the links above to register, if you haven't already, or to log in.Contact us
Follow us
Daily Archives
-
Recent Comments
- Monkeyhawk on Koch seeks funds from health care law it opposed
- Halesbells on Koch seeks funds from health care law it opposed
- Phantom on Koch seeks funds from health care law it opposed
- Phantom on Koch seeks funds from health care law it opposed
- Monkeyhawk on Koch seeks funds from health care law it opposed
- kanza on Open thread 9/2
- Monkeyhawk on Koch seeks funds from health care law it opposed
- DavidB on Koch seeks funds from health care law it opposed
- kanza on Open thread 9/2
- bth on Krugman not backing away from stimulus
141 Comments
If you look closely, you can see where the brushed out the image of the polar bears which were sitting on the iceberg.
Most of the world failed to agree to do anything about global warming at their little meet up.
I suppose they are all republicans.
Damn Repubs at Copenhagen ruined everything! :D
“ruined everything! :D”
It’s Bush’s fault.
How about “Damn Repubs at the US Senate” for holding Copenhagen hostage. They’re the ones that need to ratify any treaty, not the POTUS! Obama was not willing to make promises that he’d have hard time to fulfill due to other people’s obstructionistic partisanship.
Everytime Obama opens his fat mouth in Europe we loose. Remember the Chicago Olympic bid?
Why those pesky republicans have gotten India to lie for them!
“India’s government, under fire from opposition parties for its handling of climate negotiations in Copenhagen, says the White House is spinning the outcome for a domestic audience.
Critics have pounced on comments by David Axelrod, President Obama’s political advisor, who said the U.S. will “review” what India is doing to limit emissions and “challenge” New Delhi if necessary.
The remarks relate to how the international community will verify efforts by countries like India and China, which are major emitters of carbon dioxide and other “greenhouse gases” blamed for climate change, to reduce those emissions.
The opposition leader in India’s upper house of parliament, Arun Jaitley, voiced concern about a provision for reporting climate change-mitigating efforts, saying he felt that this would bind India, to its detriment.
Axelrod’s statements, made on CNN’s State of the Union program on Sunday and intended to highlight Obama’s “leadership” at the U.N. conference in the Danish capital, fueled suspicions that Indian negotiators had surrendered the country’s interests.
Hitting back in parliament on Tuesday, environment minister Jairam Ramesh denied that any agreement reached in Copenhagen would affect India’s sovereignty, dismissing Axelrod’s remarks as those having been made by “the spin doctor of [the] Obama administration.”
““Damn Repubs at the US Senate” for holding Copenhagen hostage”
That’s the spirit Heru_Ra_Ha! Damn those 40 Republican Senators for holding up the 58 democrats and their two lackey independents who together make a super majority of 60
Damn that minority!
(Thanks for the laugh during this festive time!)
You are all so right. OWEbama should have signed up to everything, based upon a theory that has no data to prove it. We need to commit hundreds of billions$ to corrupt third world governments so they can build bigger palaces and strengthen their dictatorships. CLIMATE OF CORRUPTION!!!
cosmo,
Outstanding. You can understand that code comments are not executable code. Very good. How is it that you can understand that, but you can not define “ARTIFICIAL”?
cosmo, can you tell us what the code comments are used for and maybe try a little harder to define “ARTIFICIAL”?
Being as this dataset from the CRU is used by most alarmists, the onus is on the CRU, and alarmists like you, to explain why “VERY ARTIFICIAL” corrections are made to source data.
“tell us what the code comments are used for and maybe try a little harder to define “ARTIFICIAL”?”
To document the code, process, or provide explanation thereof.
(I’m just a dumb funk!)
I don’t know if I would have titled this thread “Partisan split…”. Looks like while the ground-floor members of the parties have different rates of ‘belief’ in climate change there is no clear majority that thinks the science truly backs up the alarmist claims.
I think the 2/3rds folks who want the government to regulate CO2 are more interested in clean air than in climate change.
Heru_Ra_Ha Wrote:
How about “Damn Repubs at the US Senate” for holding Copenhagen hostage. They’re the ones that need to ratify any treaty, not the POTUS! Obama was not willing to make promises that he’d have hard time to fulfill due to other people’s obstructionistic partisanship.
Actually, in practice the Executive Branch can enact just about anything they want. As long as there is no law against it (Legislative Branch) or court ruling otherwise (Judicial Branch). I vaguely recall stories of the Clinton Administration enacting some environmental policies that were in an un-ratified treaty. These actions were small potatoes compared to Kyoto or the wishes of environmentalists/communists, but the policies were still put into practice.
Arctic Sea Ice Decline In Past Far Exceeded Modern Sea Ice Retreat (Multiple Times), Peer-Research Discovers
http://co2science.org/articles/V12/N32/C2.php
American_Way
Posted December 23, 2009 at 6:40 am | Permalink
American_Way
Posted December 23, 2009 at 6:54 am | Permalink
American_Way
Posted December 23, 2009 at 6:55 am | Permalink
American_Way
Posted December 23, 2009 at 7:04 am | Permalink
American_Way
Posted December 23, 2009 at 7:19 am | Permalink
American_Way
Posted December 23, 2009 at 7:44 am | Permalink
The blog crybaby is in rare form today.
So…..
Are we still in a crisis that ONLY the almighty dollar of the American Tax Payer can solve?
ANTI
Posted December 23, 2009 at 8:16 am | Permalink
So…..
Are we still in a crisis that ONLY the almighty dollar of the American Tax Payer can solve?
So how much have your taxes gone up since Obama took office?
JChen,
So is your restaurant open on Christmas Day?
If so, I’ll have the Flied Lice.
AGW killed 79 people in Poland recently.
They froze to death.
Thanks again Phil, for starting a Daily Global Warming Topic as I suggested yesterday.
It’s a very effective approach to keep Cosmos in a corner where he won’t bother anyone who cares about topics other then Global Warming.
Now for today’s Global Warming Topic, you were supposed to post something along these lines:
Say Phil,
A suggestion for tomorrow’s Daily Global Warming Topic:
Alternative Energy – Is any form of power generation acceptable to Global Warming Environmentalist Radicals? Pelosi Pishes Against Wind Of Solar Power.
http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/12/copenhagen-results-are-unimpressive/#comment-707129
Read more: http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/12/copenhagen-results-are-unimpressive/#comments#ixzz0aWRin0dy
PARIS (AFP) – Man’s best friend could be one of the environment’s worst enemies, according to a new study which says the carbon pawprint of a pet dog is more than double that of a gas-guzzling sports utility vehicle.
=============================
And you wonder why people don’t take you people seriously.
“58 percent of Republican put little or no faith in what scientists say about the environment.”
That’s right around the same percentage of cons who believe in 6 literal days to create the Earth and that an old man named Noah built a big boat. Republicans don’t LIKE science. It conflicts with their fairy tales and distracts from the bottom line.
BlueJay,
Shoot your dog and save the environment.
It’s science.
Shoot yourself and spare the taxpayers supporting you.
WTF kind of topic is this? Avoiding some of the obvious today are we?
Partisan split on (Fill in the blank).
Hmmmm seems that Mrs. Feinstein doesnt want industrialization of an area that is a Monument Area in California. Hey, I know, Johnson… let’s go build wind farms, and solar power factories at Arlington National Cemetery…. ya think??
It’s just a matter of time before the AGW crowd switches back to AW cooling.
http://www.iceagenow.com/2009_Other_Parts_of_the_World.htm
I think that we need an advice column about AGW.
Dear Cosmos: I am really trying to be a good progressive and eliminate meat from my diet. So I eat a lot of beans. But you know what happens when you eat a lot of the “musical fruit”. Yes, windies! But my windies are just full of methane and I am terribly concerned about the effect on the environment. Should I give up beans, or shoot my dog to make my bean eating more carbon neutral?
Thanks,
Concerned Citizen of the World.
ANTI
Posted December 23, 2009 at 8:23 am | Permalink
JChen,
So is your restaurant open on Christmas Day?
If so, I’ll have the Flied Lice.
You sir, are a racist pig.
You sir, are a racist pig.
================================
No.
I have been watching “A Christmas Story”.
If so, I’ll have the Flied Lice.
—————————————————-
LOL.
Mr_Kia
Posted December 23, 2009 at 9:01 am | Permalink
If so, I’ll have the Flied Lice.
—————————————————-
LOL.
So am I to understand that all conservatives on this blog are racists?
Having a black president must really tear you up. A black man is your president.
A black man is your CIC.
A black man runs your country.
Bunch of mindless skin-heads.
rac·ism
1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.
2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.
—————————————————-
What about recognizing a humorous mispronounciation fits that definition?
Are all liberal regressives on this board as thin skinned as you Mr. Chen?
soldevvb,
The tree ring proxy divergence issue has been openly discussed in the climate field for about a decade.
You’ve insisted that the output from one specific program is invalid — the “onus” is on you to prove your claim.
You need to explain why the correction values are incorrect.
You should also provide the correct values, and explain why those values are correct.
BlueJay
Posted December 23, 2009 at 8:42 am | Permalink
Shoot yourself and spare the taxpayers supporting you.
If you would do the same it would save us taxpatyers from supporting you and hearing you whine gimme and I want mutliple times a day,seriously though God bless you and your family at this time of year and hope 2010 is full of blessings for you and yours
“JChen”
Another sockpuppet for a liberal coward NIC on the weblog.
Business as usual.
Bbbb-Bawk!!!
American_Way
Posted December 23, 2009 at 9:26 am | Permalink
“JChen”
Another sockpuppet for a liberal coward NIC on the weblog.
Business as usual.
Bbbb-Bawk!!!
Are you referring to the one who always backs out of meet ups?
Regular posted December 23, 2009 at 6:48 am
Damn Repubs at Copenhagen ruined everything! :D
———————————-
The AGW science deniers top Republican, Sen. Inhofe (Ridiculous – Oil), had trouble finding anyone who would listen to to his irrational rantings.
After only about 2 hours in Copenhagen, he took a 9 hour flight back to the U.S..
‘Inhofe a world hit — not‘
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/12/18/2156671.aspx
“National Journal . . . In fact, the only real opposition voice Inhofe heard here might have been a reporter from Der Spiegel who told Inhofe at one point, ‘That’s ridiculous. You’re ridiculous.‘ ”
“Are you referring to the one who always backs out of meet ups?”
Could be. But could just as easily be one of those old lib posters who have left the blog with their tails between their legs.
Maybe one of those now posting heavenly lovey dovey sweet posts on their new blog?
They sneak back here from time-to-time to relieve themselves and play their alter-ego’s. (can’t have their fellow liberals knowing they are really not above the rest of us humans.)
You need to explain why the correction values are incorrect.
So it is a truuuuuuust me thing. How very scientific. They have no burden of proof, but those that find “VERY ARTIFICIAL correction” troubling have the burden.
Pretty solid science. And you wonder why your faith is collapsing.
There are no doubt anti-science Democrats (money talk$), but the confluence of industry control and anti-government ideology has produced an Republican party more anti-science than any I’ve seen in history, and the timing is, quite frankly, scary.
Scientists: Bush Distorts Science
Kristen Philipkoski Email 02.18.04
The Bush administration has distorted scientific fact leading to policy decisions on the environment, health, biomedical research and nuclear weaponry, a group of about 60 scientists, including 20 Nobel laureates, said in a statement on Wednesday.
http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/news/2004/02/62339
The Republican War on Science
By Chris Mooney
http://www.waronscience.com/home.php
Hmmmm seems that Mrs. Feinstein doesnt want industrialization of an area that is a Monument Area in California. Hey, I know, Johnson… let’s go build wind farms, and solar power factories at Arlington National Cemetery…. ya think?? - Chas
——
I posted on this yesterday. Frankly, I’ll believe it’s a crisis when those who are telling us it’s a crisis ACT like it’s a crisis.
AGW killed 79 people in Poland recently.
They froze to death.
Really? You know, I haven’t seen the details, but anyone who hasn’t been blissfully ignorant the past 20 years knows the theory predicted stronger, erratic weather patterns–including in the weather.
Whether is was AGW or simply the fact that Poland gets cold in winter remains to be seen.
soldevvb,
Why should I “truuuuuuust” you, when you make an empty claim that one specific program produces invalid output?
You made the claim, so show us your proof — and a comment in the code is not proof.
I posted on this yesterday. Frankly, I’ll believe it’s a crisis when those who are telling us it’s a crisis ACT like it’s a crisis.
That would be now–actually several years back.
Getting non-scientist politicians to take serious action, on the other hand, is a taller order, particular when looks at th strong monetary pushback (by comparison, taking on the tobacco industry was easy).
Tragically, even for those who talk “green” when it’s politically convenient, it may take a horribly unexpected Katrina-like event to really focus their attention on the consequences of doing nothing.
“including in the winter”
““Are you referring to the one who always backs out of meet ups?”
Ya mean Bawksalot boxlock20?
Chas
Posted December 23, 2009 at 8:48 am | Permalink
Hmmmm seems that Mrs. Feinstein doesnt want industrialization of an area that is a Monument Area in California. Hey, I know, Johnson… let’s go build wind farms, and solar power factories at Arlington National Cemetery…. ya think??
—————————-
The PPP doesn’t know the difference between the Mojave Desert, where the Solar Energy plant was proposed to be built, and a Cemetary.
American_Way
Posted December 23, 2009 at 9:34 am | Permalink
“Are you referring to the one who always backs out of meet ups?”
Could be. But could just as easily be one of those old lib posters who have left the blog with their tails between their legs.
Dear racist conservatives,
I used to post on this blog as JChen. I left because I was tired of dealing with a bunch of cretins. Looks like not much has changed.
Looks like you conservatives are more worried about NICs that a certian lib poster.
So which of you “good ole boys” wants to be the first to pull the corners of your eyes back to look Chinese?
We of Asian persuasion love that….
John Lefebvre, the top financial benefactor of the DeSmog Blog, is facing substantial prison time after pleading guilty to federal money-laundering charges.
The DeSmog Blog is operated by a small group of public relations people who specialize in attempting to discredit respected scientists and policy analysts who disagree with alarmist global warming theory.
Ironically, DeSmog Blog’s favorite tactic is to claim scientists and policy analysts who disagree with alarmist global warming theory are funded by “dirty money.”
The revelation of the blog’s major source of funding as a convicted money launderer may undermine DeSmog’s attempts to smear the integrity of respected, law-abiding scientists who disagree with them.
Apparently unashamed by their criminal connections, the DeSmog Blog Web site proclaims, “The DeSmogBlog team is especially grateful to our benefactor John Lefebvre. … John has been outspoken, uncompromising, and courageous in challenging those who would muddy the climate change debate, and he has enabled and inspired the same standard on the blog.”
Lefebvre, who pleaded guilty in June 2007, faces up to 20 years in a federal penitentiary.
http://www.heartland.org/policybot/results/22611/Blog_Funder_Guilty_of_MoneyLaundering.html
————–
Could this be MO?
The Climategate conpirators will soon join him in the pokey.
Having a black president must really tear you up. A black man is your president.
============================================
Nah, not really.
It does however, ‘tear me up’ that he is a ‘Howdy Doody’ President for the Progressive further destruction of a once great nation.
The fact that he is 1/2 Black doesn’t bother me in the least. That’s just a token for the Left.
JChen is Blue Jay
So which of you “good ole boys” wants to be the first to pull the corners of your eyes back to look Chinese?
We of Asian persuasion love that….
—————————————————-
I for one prefer the buck teeth and coke-bottle glasses.
http://www.who-sucks.com/wp-content/uploads/icons//2007/07/jap1.jpg
Eating feral cats is good for the environment and it’s the responsible thing to do, just ask JChen.
GMC70 posted December 23, 2009 at 10:05 am
Hmmmm seems that Mrs. Feinstein doesnt want industrialization of an area that is a Monument Area in California. Hey, I know, Johnson… let’s go build wind farms, and solar power factories at Arlington National Cemetery…. ya think?? – Chas
——
I posted on this yesterday. Frankly, I’ll believe it’s a crisis when those who are telling us it’s a crisis ACT like it’s a crisis.
———————————
It’s the climate scientists who have been telling us that it’s a crisis, but they do not have the power to “ACT”.
It’s the climate scientists who have been telling us that it’s a crisis, but they do not have the power to “ACT”.
===============================
I dunno, Algore has been blathering around like a wet hen, all the while flying around spewing tons of carbon.
But it’s us that need to change….
donndublin cannot defend the indefensible 2007 paper by Douglass, et al, so donndublin instead attacks the “messengers”.
‘David H. Douglass, John R. Christy, Benjamin D. Pearson, S. Fred Singer‘
http://www.realclimate.org/wiki/index.php?title=David_H._Douglass%2C_John_R._Christy%2C_Benjamin_D._Pearson%2C_S._Fred_Singer
“Nearly two-thirds of Americans want the federal government to regulate the release of greenhouse gases from sources such as power plants, cars and factories,”
These numbers will only increase. This is doom for the Republicans who have contempt for the environment as one of the key planks of their party.
donndublin cannot defend the indefensible 2007 paper by Douglass, et al, so donndublin instead attacks the “messengers”.
‘Singer’s Deniers Misrepresenting New Climatology Journal Article‘
http://www.desmogblog.com/singers-deniers-misrepresenting-new-climatology-journal-article
These numbers will only increase. This is doom for the Republicans who have contempt for the environment as one of the key planks of their party.
================================
No.
This is doom for the few American Industries that haven’t fled to third world countries.
Good by American Manufacturing. (What little is left)
Good bye American Manufacturing. (What little is left)
“Good by American Manufacturing.”
What American manufacturing?
ANTI,
Please try to pay attention. Al Gore has been repeating what the climate scientists have been saying.
And Al Gore is not a politician, so he cannot “ACT” by enacting policies.
Respect for the planet or coddle the few who have not already let greed make them betray their country?
I vote the planet. All opposed? The ayes have it.
BlueJay
Posted December 23, 2009 at 10:44 am | Permalink
“Good by American Manufacturing.”
What American manufacturing?
====================================
Ha!
If you think really hard, you will get it.
Mo cannot defend the indefensible attack blogs desmog and realclimate.
One of the Brit papers says that China and India have plans to build 850 coal fired generators in the next decade which will emit more pollutants than the optimim/maximum/can’t-be-achieved goals for reduction of emissions in all of North America…and we’re the bad guys! Funny no one talks about the huge number of cars entering the Chinese and Indian roads either, for the Chinese are the largest buyer of cars and have been for the last 2 years.
“You better leave us alone to pollute your air and water! If you don’t, we will leave!”
Younger eyes and newer logic are looking at this now. Can’t do your thing in an environmentally friendly way?
Bye. No loss.
sursum
Posted December 23, 2009 at 10:50 am | Permalink
One of the Brit papers says that China and India have plans to build 850 coal fired generators in the next decade which will emit more pollutants than the optimim/maximum/can’t-be-achieved goals for reduction of emissions in all of North America…and we’re the bad guys! Funny no one talks about the huge number of cars entering the Chinese and Indian roads either, for the Chinese are the largest buyer of cars and have been for the last 2 years.
====================================
Excellent post.
The self importance of some here is so laughable that it verges on the ridiculous
cosmos_originally
Posted December 23, 2009 at 10:45 am | Permalink
ANTI,
Please try to pay attention. Al Gore has been repeating what the climate scientists have been saying.
And Al Gore is not a politician, so he cannot “ACT” by enacting policies.
————–
MO,
Did the “climate scientists” tell Algore that the center of the earth is millions of degrees?
Did the “climate scientists” tell Algore that the
Climategate eamils were all written 10 years ago?
Did the “climate scientists” tell Algore that over 50% of the CO2 in the atmosphere is caused by man?
Did the “climate scientists” tell Algore the numerous other lies he has told?
http://www.noteviljustwrong.com/blog/general/218-the-nine-lies-of-al-gore
The people that are going to single handedly save the planet and can’t provide for themselves,without depending on othere are at the same time funny and pathetic
I don’t like climate laws so I’ll ignore them
“I don’t like climate laws so I’ll ignore them.”
You may feel free to despoil your sister’s basement. That’s the limit of your personal capacity to inflict environmental damage beyond being a champion of it.
donndublin posted December 23, 2009 at 10:48 am
Mo cannot defend the indefensible attack blogs desmog and realclimate.
————————
I already have, by pointing out that they’re accurate re Douglass et al, and Singer.
whatever you say BlueChen
just cranked my thermostat to a balmy 78 in my apt because I can and I can afford it
I hope his chair isn’t made of vinyl! Otherwise when he FINALLY peels himself off it, we’ll ALL hear.
Ugh.
Freebird1971
Posted December 23, 2009 at 10:23 am | Permalink
JChen is Blue Jay
Then you would be wrong, BirdPerson.
Build-A-Bear responds to global warming scare, removes videos from site
Under the guise of a children’s game on its website, it was revealed yesterday that Build-A-Bear Workshop was pushing the manmade climate change theory to children. The videos portrayed the dire scenario of the North Pole melting and Christmas potentially having to be canceled all due to the evils of global warming. Apparently the company has begun to feel the heat themselves as they have responded publicly and removed the videos from their site.
___________________
Warmers can’t convince adults so they try to scare the kids. Instead of sending letters to Santa, watch the kids send snow that’s fallen over half the country.
If he cranks the humidifier too, his OWN ecosystem will experience a Cambrian explosion.
prove it to me JChen until then you and BJ are one in the same
ANTI
Posted December 23, 2009 at 10:27 am | Permalink
Eating feral cats is good for the environment and it’s the responsible thing to do, just ask JChen.
Silly little man, have you ever tried cat? It’s very tasty and lean to boot.
Don’t worry Anti. Considering the way your economy is going, You may get to try cat meat before long.
Hint: Rat isn’t half bad if you can get a nice big one. Try to stay away from the city rats.
Freebird1971
Posted December 23, 2009 at 11:26 am | Permalink
prove it to me JChen until then you and BJ are one in the same
Let’s make it interesting, round-eye.
A little wager?
Or how about we make it a BIG wager. Several zeros?
Put up or shut up.
Hint: Rat isn’t half bad if you can get a nice big one. Try to stay away from the city rats.
==========================
Thanks for the tip.
Now here is one for you, coon and squirrel is mighty good eatin’.
how bout a breakfast meeting me you and blue jay, slope? I’ll buy
Ooops, I forgot to add:
Yell “Yee Haw”, before you dust one, it scares the gamy flavor out of ‘em.
BirdPerson,
Would you know BlueJay if you met him?
or do you prefer dink?
Well If there were 2 of you then it would be asssumed that one of you were the little bird,but of course he has refused on several occasions to meet for a free breakfast.
Freebird1971
Posted December 23, 2009 at 11:32 am | Permalink
how bout a breakfast meeting me you and blue jay, slope? I’ll buy
Are you sure you can get BlueJay to attend? I think he don’t like you much.
BlueJay looks like a 14 year old boy with a crappy ball cap and long hair.
You’ll recognise him.
Probably not,it would upset his theory that everyone but him is the same poster. but the invite is open to you
. . . and the pointless silliness continues.
In actuality, there are only two (2) participants in the WEBlog comments.
http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-418/#comment-333487
“Freebird1971
Posted December 23, 2009 at 11:10 am | Permalink
just cranked my thermostat to a balmy 78 in my apt because I can and I can afford it”
Freebird, if you can afford it then we we need to redistribute your wealth and give it to the entitled. There are a lot of people out there who don’t have time or ambition to work for a living. You need to ‘give them the wealth’. You work for a living so you can’t be one of the entitled crowd. Enjoy it while you’ve got it because the government we elected is going to take it away.
JChen
Posted December 23, 2009 at 11:43 am | Permalink
Freebird1971
Posted December 23, 2009 at 11:35 am | Permalink
or do you prefer dink?
Oh come now, can’t we get directly to “go_ok”? That’s the term you really want to use, isn’t it?
JChen,
You do the Math….
You’re probably better at it..
;)
ANTI
Posted December 23, 2009 at 11:41 am | Permalink
BlueJay looks like a 14 year old boy with a crappy ball cap and long hair.
You’ll recognise him.
And what does JChen look like?
donndublin posted December 23, 2009 at 11:20 am
Warmers can’t convince adults so they try to scare the kids.
——————–
AGW science deniers like donndublin cannot understand even the simplest basic climate science — and they don’t care about the kids future on Earth.
Yeah,JC but I’m trying to be just a tad more politically correct
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
And what does JChen look like?
===================================
A Wop, Cracker, Day-go, Kr@ut, Dune Coon?
I dunno, and I don’t care.
We are all people with funny names.
Why should I “truuuuuuust” you, when you make an empty claim that one specific program produces invalid output?
Do you know what VERY ARTIFICIAL means cosmo? Even a 12 year old girl should understand that. What does it mean cosmo?
You made the claim, so show us your proof — and a comment in the code is not proof.
Uhm, no, little girl, the CRU made the claim that this was a valid VERY ARTIFICIAL correction. The CRU is the one passing this off as valid data. Lets see the proof that this ARTIFICIAL CORRECTION is accurate and peer reviewed.
Are you really this stupid cosmo? This blind?
ANTI
Posted December 23, 2009 at 11:48 am | Permalink
JChen,
You do the Math….
You’re probably better at it..
;)
Ah, a healthy sense of humor. I like this guy.
JChen,
Whatever you do, don’t try to steal Freebird1971’s prized Gran Torino.
I have a feeling you two are going to end up the best of friends IRL.
Thanks for the tip.
Now here is one for you, coon and squirrel is mighty good eatin’.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Plus, there’s the off-chance that an errant shot may precipitate events which culminate in your relocation to Beverly Hills.
Daniel
Posted December 23, 2009 at 12:15 pm | Permalink
JChen,
Whatever you do, don’t try to steal Freebird1971’s prized Gran Torino.
I have a feeling you two are going to end up the best of friends IRL.
Hahaha, Daniel, I saw that movie. I doubt if BirdPerson that tough.
Don’t you mean “Bird pursawn that trough”?
Freebird1971
Posted December 23, 2009 at 11:49 am | Permalink
Yeah,JC but I’m trying to be just a tad more politically correct
Ok BirdPerson, let’s make this interesting, say a wager. I have $1,000 that says I’m not BlueJay.
PSSSSST! BlueJay, would you like to split the winnings, say 50/50?
soldevvb posted December 23, 2009 at 11:59 am
Uhm, no, little girl, the CRU made the claim that this was a valid VERY ARTIFICIAL correction. The CRU is the one passing this off as valid data. Lets see the proof that this ARTIFICIAL CORRECTION is accurate and peer reviewed.
————————–
Where did CRU make that claim, for that specific code and correction? You said they did, so prove it.
Prove that specific code was used for peer-reviewed purposes, and not for something else, like a test run or an informal presentation graph.
Mr_Kia
Posted December 23, 2009 at 12:33 pm | Permalink
Don’t you mean “Bird pursawn that trough”?
My, my, some of you get more racist by the moment.
N-word next?
sprit da rinnings?
JChen
Posted December 23, 2009 at 12:36 pm | Permalink
Mr_Kia
Posted December 23, 2009 at 12:33 pm | Permalink
Don’t you mean “Bird pursawn that trough”?
My, my, some of you get more racist by the moment.
N-word next?
————————————————–
Some word say impersonating a person of color is racist.
I recall Ted Danson getting a lot of flack from the from regressives…..while dating Whopee Goldberg…ya you regressives are GENIUSES.
Climate science “deniers” like Mo who supports fraudulent scientists that deny the “peer review” process to scientists that don’t support the pre conceived hypothesis of AWG are the real “deniers”.
MO has no scientific credentials so he resorts to name calling.
What does VERY ARTIFICIAL mean? Seems cosmo is too stupid to figure it out.
soldevvb,
What type of correction should be used to convert tree ring data into temperatures?
And why can’t soldevvb answer my reasonable 12:34 pm post questions?
Where did CRU make that claim, for that specific code and correction? You said they did, so prove it.
Prove that specific code was used for peer-reviewed purposes, and not for something else, like a test run or an informal presentation graph.
Why can’t cosmo answer my day old question “What does VERY ARTIFICIAL mean”. Not that hard tough girl.
Are you seriously this stupid?
N-word next?
==============================
Ni! Ni! Ni!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTQfGd3G6dg
Mr_Kia
Posted December 23, 2009 at 12:38 pm | Permalink
Some word say impersonating a person of color is racist.
Some would say that the world is flat.
Some would say that the planet is less than 10,000 years old.
I’m not impersonating anybody.
soldevvb,
For all that you know, that specific program produces very valid output.
Your lengthy whining about one comment is stupid, and boring.
Try to find an actual flaw in the code. . . or find something else to waste your time on.
Why can’t cosmo answer a very simple question?
What does VERY ARTIFICIAL mean?
SolDevVB
Posted December 23, 2009 at 1:27 pm | Permalink
Why can’t cosmo answer a very simple question?
What does VERY ARTIFICIAL mean?
SolDevVB, how many times will you ask the same stupid question? You’re like a broken record. On and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on……
What a pin-head.
JChen posted December 23, 2009 at 1:50 pm
SolDevVB, how many times will you ask the same stupid question? You’re like a broken record. On and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on……
What a pin-head.
———————————-
It’s all that soldevvb can do, since he does not seem to know of any actual flaw in the code.
Also, I already told him yesterday that I don’t need to defend the code, and I’m not a tree ring expert.
http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/12/copenhagen-results-are-unimpressive/#comment-707242
But soldevvb continues his immature hissy fit anyway, demanding that I explain what one irrelevant comment means.
The Oils Sands which is Americas No 1 source of imported oil has been villified by the holier-than-thou crowd who decry, whatever the decry, turn out to be not so terrible after all. They represent 1/100th of 1% of the worlds’ emissions and is worth about $180 billion annually to the North American economy. The reason it’s so clean is missed by the total cost ignorers, for it’s transported by pipeline (after enviornemntal studies) without consuming energy in the volume of fuel oil and has no balast waste pollution regurgitated into the sea like those convienced flagged vessels. Also the Boreal forest actually inhales more CO2 than is produced by the sand exploration emmissions and the re-forestration/carbon capturing efforts just coming onstream, seem to be working. One more point, a Brit TV crew were interviewing an Innuit elder about the poor polar bears, what with their decline and all…. the elder looked at him in puzzlement, so I guess he’ll never will understand the whiteman.
I was thinking of making up a Chimp dressed up as a modern day version “Iron Eyes Cody” – the fake indian – complete with crocodile tears streaming down his face with tiny co2 bubblets popping out in rainbow fantasia type explosions.
Either that a Grim
ReaperPolar Bear standing on a tropical island in arctic circle selling beach front property on time shares.sursum,
Unfortunately for you, many people know that the oil sands operations are an environmental disaster.
And despite that one uninformed Inuit elder, many people know about the the likely loss of polar bear habitat.
cosmos..that’s my point…disaster no, but like any mining operation ground retoration comes after the ravages. Folks in the areas the work is being done would disagree with the Copenhagen comments about the oil sands, just read some Alberta based comments.
The explanation for the poll results is obvious, repubs are faith base folks not trusting in the scientific methodology. Don’t believe it? Ask them about evolution.
Who really gives a sh*t?
Most of us don’t. If we did we would live our lives in a green manner – without the freaking government telling us to.
Instead of greening up – we want the government to take our money from us and FORCE us to be good.
It really is stupid is as stupid does.
Right RoaCH. . . you and many people don’t give a sh*t about what happens to our only Earth.
That’s why we need policies that will reduce “greenhouse” gases, instead of relying on voluntary efforts.
Phillips – keep up the good work! Give Comosis a place to post her unending devotion to the hotter than he11 earth theory.
I’ll send you another twenty bucks when you post the next one.
Thanx for keeping him occupied!
Threads like this aren’t for me, RoaCH.
They’re for people like you, to prove how stupid, misinformed, and ignorant you deniers are re the AGW science issue.
ATTENTION ALL SCIENCE DENYING REPUBLICANS!
Now is the time to boycott Build-A-Bear and Child Indoctrination Workshop!
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100020658/build-a-bear-the-sinister-green-plot-to-turn-our-kids-into-eco-fascist-manchurian-candidates/
Pleefer posted December 23, 2009 at 11:49 pm
ATTENTION ALL SCIENCE DENYING REPUBLICANS!
——————–
Almost all Republicans are science deniers.
So are almost all democrats when the science doesn’t fit their bill.
And cosmo still can’t answer a simple question. Bitter pill isn’t it lil girl.
Just like the scientists[sic] you worship, if it doens’t fit the faith agenda, ignore it, or torture it until it does.
Praise be.
Healthy business at Build a bear just last night there Pleefer.
The kids are getting the message! You should celebrate this. It’s your planet too. Try to care about something beyond the end of your nose.
soldevvb still doesn’t understand reality, and still can’t refute climate science.
Pleefer,
Do you not understand the difference between science and policy?
Bitter pill lil girl. I understand. It is a four syllable word after all.
All you liberals bowing at the altar or Algore should know one thing, he is laughing all the way to the bank. The same buffoon that said he invented the internet is the green spokesperson. Green in his bank account. You guys bag on Sarah Palin and think algore is smart?
mikew worships falsehoods and irrational denials.