Registered?
Commenting on WE Blog now requires you to be a Kansas.com member. Use the links above to register, if you haven't already, or to log in.Contact us
Follow us
Daily Archives
-
Recent Comments
- BlueJay on Open thread 11/22
- BlueJay on Open thread 11/22
- outlander on Open thread 11/22
- JWink on Jail consultants straining patience
- Howserfan on Minority status in Senate; majority approval at home
- satatom on Open thread 11/22
- Monkeyhawk on Open thread 11/22
- Regular on Open thread 11/22
- Monkeyhawk on Minority status in Senate; majority approval at home
- Monkeyhawk on Open thread 11/22
174 Comments
Your Sunday morning cartoon –
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oRIxYUMBtA
Your Sunday morning hymn –
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjywI7nc_PQ
Your Sunday morning sermon –
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pebDmqjwDcQ
Sunday, June 28, 2009
Carbongate
A suppressed EPA study says old U.N. data ignore the decline in global temperatures and other inconvenient truths. Was the report kept under wraps to influence the vote on the cap-and-trade bill?
This was supposed to be the most transparent administration ever. Yet as the House of Representatives prepared to vote on the Waxman-Markey bill, the largest tax increase in U.S. history on 100% of Americans, an attempt was made to suppress a study shredding supporters’ arguments.
On Friday, the day of the vote, the Competitive Enterprise Institute said it was releasing “an internal study on climate science which was suppressed by the Environmental Protection Agency.”
In the release, the institute’s Richard Morrison said “internal EPA e-mail messages, released by CEI earlier in the week, indicate that the report was kept under wraps and its author silenced because of pressure to support the administration’s agenda of regulating carbon dioxide.”
Reading the report, available on the CEI Web site, we find this “endangerment analysis” contains such interesting items as: “Given the downward trend in temperatures since 1998 (which some think will continue until at least 2030), there is no particular reason to rush into decisions based on a scientific hypothesis that does not appear to explain most of the available data.”
What the report says is that the EPA, by adopting the United Nations’ 2007 “Fourth Assessment” report, is relying on outdated research by its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The research, it says, is “at best three years out of date in a rapidly changing field” and ignores the latest scientific findings.
Besides noting the decline in temperatures as CO2 levels have increased, the draft report says the “consensus” on storm frequency and intensity is now “much more neutral.”
Then there’s one of Al Gore’s grim fairy tales — the melting of the Greenland ice sheet and glaciers the size of Tennessee roaming the North Atlantic. “The idea that warming temperatures will cause Greenland to rapidly shed its ice has been greatly diminished by new results indicating little evidence for operations of such processes,” the report says.
Little evidence? Outdated U.N. research? No reason to rush? This is not what the Obama administration and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi were telling us when they were rushing to force a Friday vote on Waxman-Markey. We were given the impression that unless we passed this cap-and-tax fiasco, polar bears would be extinct by the Fourth of July.
We have noted frequently the significance of solar activity on earth’s climate and history. This EPA draft report not only confirms our reporting but the brazen incompetence of those “experts” that have been prophesying planetary apocalypse.
“A new 2009 paper by Scafetta and West,” the report says, “suggests that the IPCC used faulty solar data in dismissing the direct effect of solar variability on global temperatures. Their report suggests that solar variability could account for up to 68% of the increase in Earth’s global temperatures.”
The report was the product of Alan Carlin, senior operations research analyst at the EPA’s National Center for Environmental Economics (NCEE). He’s been with the EPA for 38 years but now has been taken off all climate-related work. He is convinced that actual climate observations do not match climate change theories and that only the politics, not the science, has been settled.
Thomas Fuller, environmental policy blogger with the San Francisco Examiner, wrote Thursday in a story developed in conjunction with Anthony Watts’ Web site wattsupwiththat.com: “A source inside the Environmental Protection Agency confirmed many of the claims made by analyst Alan Carlin, the economist/physicist who yesterday went public with accusations that science was being ignored in evaluating the danger of CO2.”
All this is particularly interesting because of the charges by Al Gore, NASA’s James Hansen and others that the Bush administration and energy companies actively suppressed the truth about climate change.
One of the e-mails unearthed by CEI was dated March 12, from Al McGartland, office director at NCEE, forbidding Carlin from speaking to anyone outside NCEE on endangerment issues such as those in his suppressed report.
Carlin replied on March 16, requesting that his study be forwarded to EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation, which directs EPA’s climate change program. Carlin points out the peer-reviewed references in his study and points out that the new studies “explain much of the observational data that have been collected which cannot be explained by the IPCC models.”
For saying the climate change emperors had no clothes, Carlin was told March 17: “The administrator and the administration have decided to move forward on endangerment, and your comments do not help the legal or policy case for this decision. . . . I can only see one impact of your comments given where we are in the process, and that would be a very negative impact on our office.”
In other words, the administration and Congress had their collective minds made up and didn’t want to be confused with the facts. They certainly didn’t want any inconvenient truths coming out of their own Environmental Protection Agency, the one that wants to regulate everything from your lawn mower to bovine emissions and which says the product of your respiration and ours, carbon dioxide, is a dangerous pollutant and not the basis for all life on earth.
The problem the warm-mongers have is they now are in a position of telling the American people, who are you going to believe — us or your own lying eyes? Forget the snow in Malibu, the record cold winters. Forget that temperatures have dropped for a decade.
In April, President Obama declared that “the days of science taking a back seat to ideology are over.” Apparently not, for as he spoke those very words his administration was suppressing science to advance a very pernicious ideology.
SOURCE
Invester’s Business Daily/Ediorials
Who cares about that stuff, “HLP?”
The substantive issue is the size of the First Lady’s ass, isn’t it?
The substantive issue is the size of the First Lady’s ass, isn’t it?
_________________________________________
You bet!
Sooner or later it will become too large for the MSM to ignore!
“Who cares about that stuff, “HLP?”
The substantive issue is the size of the First Lady’s ass, isn’t it?”
I’m interested in that stuff;
“The problem the warm-mongers have is they now are in a position of telling the American people, who are you going to believe — us or your own lying eyes? Forget the snow in Malibu, the record cold winters. Forget that temperatures have dropped for a decade.”
Funny!
Though I do agree with you Monkey when you say;
“The substantive issue is the size of the First Lady’s ass, isn’t it?”
I mean how big is it going to get….it seems to be growing exponentially.
“….it seems to be growing exponentially.”
Directly opposite of Little Barry’s approval numbers too.
BJ/JR shall now officially be known as:
Poster Boy®
The Poster Boy® blogs from 8 am to 2 am during the week, and from 10 am to 2 am during the weekends.
(As if a weekend makes any difference to a deadbeat! Do deadbeats get a vacation? They are on vacation 24/7.)
He is here posting almost all the time, thus his new official name: Poster Boy®
On this date, Jun 28th, record setting temperatures for Wichita Kansas
High: 106 °F (1990)
Low: 54 °F (1985)
The press and the fashion mavens are fickle (and vicious) people.
Michelle’s butt will have serious political consequences for the ‘chosen one’ once the Washington insiders turn on her.
They’ve fawned and swooned over her muscular arms. Not much you can say about the celulite on her butt and thighs, other than she has celulite on her butt and thighs.
Even Michelle’s ‘fashion sense’ well soon be a liability. She visited Westminster Abby in a horrid outfit. She was dressed in an outfit that could only have been bought at the Easter Bunny’s yard sell.
Carbongate? The Founder of the libertarian Competitive Enterprise Institute seems to believe in Global Warming, he just LIKES it!
“In March 1992, CEI’s founder Fred Smith said of global warming: “Most of the indications right now are it looks pretty good. Warmer winters, warmer nights, no effects during the day because of clouding, sounds to me like we’re moving to a more benign planet, more rain, richer, easier productivity to agriculture.”
CEI’s funders have included…
Amoco Foundation, Inc.,FMC Foundation, Ford Motor Company Fund, Koch Family Foundations (including the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation, David H. Koch Charitable Foundation,, Philip Morris Companies, Inc., and Texaco, Inc. (Texaco Foundation).
Wikip
HLP posted June 28, 2009 at 7:27 am
Sunday, June 28, 2009
Carbongate
A suppressed EPA study says. . .
————
Uh-huh. . .
Hank posted bubkes.
‘Bubkes‘
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/06/bubkes/langswitch_lang/no
“Some parts of the blogosphere, headed up by CEI (”CO2: They call it pollution, we call it life!”), are all a-twitter over an apparently “suppressed” document that supposedly undermines the EPA Endangerment finding about human emissions of carbon dioxide and a basket of other greenhouse gases. Well a draft of this “suppressed” document has been released and we can now all read this allegedly devastating critique of the EPA science. Let’s take a look…”
——-
See link for details.
Hank,
Did you ever figure out the idea of a “virtual” office?
http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/06/open-thread-625-3/#comment-610868
“DavidB” reminds –
“CEI’s funders have included…
Amoco Foundation, Inc.,FMC Foundation, Ford Motor Company Fund, Koch Family Foundations (including the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation, David H. Koch Charitable Foundation,, Philip Morris Companies, Inc., and Texaco, Inc. (Texaco Foundation).”
…all dependent on fossil fuels for their wealth.
But they wouldn’t lie, would they?
Anyone believing these greenhouse gas restrictions are about stopping the oceans’ rise or lowering man-made co2 should watch closely the lobbying on this climate change bill.
You’ll see that it’s more about enriching the companies with the best political connections, especially cap and trade scamming companies like the GORACLE has large stock in.
If the Warmer bill passes, look for energy companies to play the cap and trade game farce while the consumer will get stuck with increasingly higher utility bills that will spiral prices upwards at record breaking rates.
What’s ironic and will be ‘poetic justice’ is states like California that depend heavily on agriculture and have all sorts of energy supply problems will take it in the ’shorts’ first. Waxman may well deliver California as a sacrificial lamb to the alter of blind greenness.
boxlock posted June 28, 2009 at 8:05 am
Forget that temperatures have dropped for a decade.”
Funny!
—————–
boxlock believes false statements are “funny!”.
The last 1/2 of the previous decade was warmer than the first 1/2.
http://tamino.wordpress.com/2009/06/26/embarrassing-questions/
HLP
Posted June 28, 2009 at 8:26 am | Permalink
She visited Westminster Abby in a horrid outfit. She was dressed in an outfit that could only have been bought at the Easter Bunny’s yard sell.
—
lol
I for one had no clue that at heart you are a frustrated women’s fashion writer, a guy producing reviews replete with Easter bunny metaphors.
?!
Heh. Go figure.
“Horrid,” lol
As for “HLP’s” fashion sense –
I suspect he’s just another Mister Blackwell wanna-be.
Only not as butch.
Poster Boy®
You are too kind.
Chas
Posted June 27, 2009 at 10:43 pm | Permalink
I tell ya what Boxlies… I did a lot of supply years ago at Our Savior Lutheran down in Mulvane… I have preached at Christ Lutheran in Wichita… and many Sundays at St. Paul’s in Peabody… among others…. I am at a ELCA congregation next Sunday in Oklahoma…. Sermon Title: Our Declaration of Dependence…. I’m looking forwarding to being there again…
——————————-
That’s why Chas’ name links to the Deciples of Christ website, http://www.disciples.org/, because he’s a Lutheran preaching at an ELCA church.
Uh huh.
Hank is also an ex-Navy “liason”(sic) and a virtual office expert.
Chas
Posted March 30, 2009 at 10:31 am | Permalink
“If anyone threatens someone with death–public figure or no, the post should be pulled.
If it continually occurs, the poster should be banned.” [CapNA]
I agree CapN.
—————————
A few months ago, Chas’ name links to the United Church of Christ, at http://www.ucc.org/.
Chas must get fired a lot from his ‘preacher’ jobs.
Fed Documents Fuel Concerns About Expanding Central Bank’s Role
JUNE 27, 2009
WASHINGTON — Documents unearthed by congressional investigators reveal disagreements among senior Federal Reserve officials about how to handle Bank of America Corp.’s acquisition of Merrill Lynch, fueling concern on Capitol Hill over giving the central bank even more power to regulate the financial system.
The glimpse inside the regulatory machinery provided by emails, memorandums and handwritten notes show a Fed that wrestled with how tough it should be on Bank of America, one of the biggest U.S. banks. It also shows Fed officials questioning more broadly their response to the financial crisis months earlier.
In December, Bank of America approached top U.S. officials about abandoning a deal, forged in the heat of the crisis, to buy investment bank Merrill Lynch. In the end, the government arranged a $20 billion rescue package for the bank to cover growing losses at Merrill.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124606477050863921.html
ALMIGHTY Government will soon Control All of US, Sheep Approve
” must get fired a lot from his ‘preacher’ jobs”
JimJohnson, I found Chas here:
http://www.unc.edu/depts/jomc/academics/dri/idog.html
When Grasping for Straws, and the Facts Don’t Support Your Agenda – Look for Stories
Obama won’t let facts get in the way. He’ll bring out the Anecdotes and Mass Media Emotional Appeals to force Americans to take ObamaCare.
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2009/06/28/obama_taps_supporters_for_help_with_healthcare_overhaul/
Obama group seeks ‘stories’ of healthcare
Grass-roots effort puts focus on need, not details
HLP
Posted June 28, 2009 at 8:26 am | Permalink
She visited Westminster Abby in a horrid outfit. She was dressed in an outfit that could only have been bought at the Easter Bunny’s yard sell.
* * * * *
It is distsrubing when our manly, gun-toting, men start to sound so limp wristed.
American_Way
Posted June 28, 2009 at 9:06 am | Permalink
” must get fired a lot from his ‘preacher’ jobs”
JimJohnson, I found Chas here:
http://www.unc.edu/depts/jomc/academics/dri/idog.html
====================
OMG! That’s him!
He has been lying to everyone this whole time!
The WSJ article says that there was an internal discussion highlighting different points of view… This is some kind of a problem?
It certainly is not supporting evidence of the poster’s conclusion, nor of the disrespecting of the American people.
“She was dressed in an outfit that could only have been bought at the Easter Bunny’s yard sell.”
“What really thrills me, what really feels liberating in a very personal way, is the official new prominence of Michelle Obama. Barack’s better half not only has stature but is statuesque. She has corruscating intelligence, beauty, style and — drumroll, please — a butt. (Yes, you read that right: I’m going to talk about the first lady’s butt.)” And she does:
Kaplan, “While it isn’t humongous, per se, it is a solid, round, black, class-A boo-tay. Try as Michelle might to cover it with those Mamie Eisenhower skirts and sheath dresses meant to reassure mainstream voters, the butt would not be denied.” Kaplan sees Michelle Obama’s butt as the a signifier of her blackness, as a symbol of what it means to be black:”
http://jezebel.com/5091824/writer-extolls-the-virtues-of-michelle-obamas-butt
“The last 1/2 of the previous decade was warmer than the first 1/2.”—cosmos
Oh my gawd, temperatures fluctuate up and down around the globe…..the sky is falling, the sky is falling!!!
“Michelle’s butt will have serious political consequences for the ‘chosen one’ once the Washington insiders turn on her.”
Big Bertha. This is what Bill Cosby meant by “One of the Butt Sisters.” We’re talking State of Maine. How do you get that thing in the helicopter? I mean really, peeps, it’s time for some serious “big back” throw down:
- Michelle Obama’s butt’s so big they had to order an entirely new Air Force One with super-sized seats
- Michelle Obama’s butt’s so big her workout DVD is the size of an Extra Large Pizza
- Michelle Obama’s butt’s so big the DNC considered switching logos with the GOP
- Michelle Obama’s butt’s so big she rocks the entire free world every time she sits down
- Michelle Obama’s butt’s so big that when she flies on Air Force one it shows up as a separate blip on the radar
- Michelle Obama’s butt’s so big a beeper goes off every time she backs up
- Michelle Obama’s butt’s so big when she wears an orange dress with white belt and pearls people mistake her for a Public Storage facility
- Michelle Obama’s butt’s so big Congress plans to grant her two Senators and a Congressional seat
- Michelle Obama’s butt’s so big that CERN in Switzerland asked her to substitute this Fall in case they can’t generate a Black Hole with the Large Hadron Collider
“American_Way” –
Your 9:35 post will make “okobserver” so proud.
Thanks for contributing CON “substance” to this forum.
DavidB
Posted June 28, 2009 at 9:18 am | Permalink
The WSJ article says that there was an internal discussion highlighting different points of view… This is some kind of a problem?
It certainly is not supporting evidence of the poster’s conclusion, nor of the disrespecting of the American people.
——————————-
Oh He11 No, It’s Not a Problem When Government Forces a Company to -
1. Take $20 Billion in Taxpayers money even if they don’t want it or need it.
2. Buy another company. In this case, Bank of America was forced to continue their plans to buy Merrill Lynch.
3. Threatens to fire the CEO.
The Government does not have the right to take any of the 3 steps above. Yet the Government did all three and more!
Oh, no problem, unless you value Freedom!
Well Monkey, I have decided to turn over a new leaf.
I thought to myself, “Self. If you can’t beat em, join em!”
So I will just post attacks on other posters and derogatory mean remarks from now on.
you know – kinda like you.
boxlock 20 posted June 28, 2009 at 9:22 am
Oh my gawd, temperatures fluctuate up and down around the globe…..the sky is falling, the sky is falling!!!
—————-
Global temperatures have been rising since the mid-1970’s.
http://tamino.wordpress.com/2009/06/26/embarrassing-questions/
Obama, after 5 months is not lookin so hot:
Date 06/28/2009
Presidential Approval Index 0
Strongly Approve 32%
Strongly Disapprove 32%
Total Approve 54%
Total Disapprove 45%
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/obama_approval_index_history
Just like this article, I think the energy bill is a pile of dog poop.
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/boehner-climate-bill-a-pile-of-s–t-2009-06-27.html
“Obama, after 5 months is not lookin so hot:”
I think you need to rephrase that. To lib women Obama does in fact look hot. They vote on looks.
Issues? Don’t matter.
Decisions? Don’t matter.
Obama can run the USA into the dirt and libs will still be worshipping the ground he walks on.
Michelle Obama’s buffalo butt is just as relevent as Sarah Palin’s children.
We’ve had several Palin topics, so it’s high time The Eagle had several Buffalo Butt Michelle Obama topics.
Let’s roll!
What a guy Sanford is, his wife was just unreasonable for not giving him permission to continue to visit his mistress!
She should Stand by Her Man!
At least this gives you guys something you have expertise in to talk about…
Well you can see AmWay, that Obama is Failing to unite America.
Half Oppose Him, and Half Support Him.
Obama needs to learn to compromise more, open up a transparent government, be open to new ideas, and allow ample time for debate of serious issues.
Instead,
HE JUST POUNDS FEAR OF IMMINENT PERIL INTO OUR HEADS
to get his Bills passed.
Nice approach, for a focking dictator.
HLP is certainly obsessed with Michelle’s butt. One can only assume he’s envious of the O man.
Actually, a woman black democrat brought it to my attention (I don’t watch tv). Apparently, black but ts are an important aspect of American History.
Dont forget to include AmWay in there, too, Phantom…
Phantom
Posted June 28, 2009 at 10:05 am | Permalink
HLP is certainly obsessed with Michelle’s butt. One can only assume he’s envious of the O man.
__________________________________
You got it Phantom!
I’m definitely a ‘butt man’! However, it isn’t a buffalo butt on an Amazon that turns me on! Michelle is a scarey woman! (with a gigantic, growing butt)
Kaplan says that since slavery
the black American but t has been “vil ified
I’ve seen Hank’s wife.
She’s like the highway between Dallas and Ft Worth.
No curves.
I see the day has started out with the unleashing of racist/sexist fetishes on the part of white posters, focused on African/American female posteriors…. What a glorious tribute to true Americanism….
NOT!!!
There’s a special reserve for Blackbutts.
http://www.placesonline.com/oceania/australia/newcastle/blackbutt_reserve.asp
Blackbutt Reserve offers a tourist nature trails and also wildlife exhibits. The residents too enjoy the reserve as it offers these amenities for them. There are also children’s playgrounds and such recreational facilities at this reserve. This is the perfect place to have a complete relaxed family picnic or to explore the beauty of the nature. There are also events which are held at Blackbutt Reserve.
Chas
Posted June 28, 2009 at 10:12 am | Permalink
Dont forget to include AmWay in there, too, Phantom…
========================
Church is out early today.
Amway loves Michelle’s backyard too!
I watched “Boner” reading from the bill on C-Span.You can find it on YouTube.
At one point he was trying to make fun of provisions to eliminate known carcinogens from building materials, and you could see he was embarrassed by what he was doing.
But have heart, he even managed to squeeze in an ACORN crack…
He could only keep it up for an hour, because he was Jonesing for a ciggy. A couple of times he coughed up a wad of phlegm. It was a very impressive moment. Not on a par with the “Mr . Smith Goes to Washington” filibuster scenes, though.
Jimmy Stewart acted passionate. “Boner” just acted sour, bitter and cynical.
Right on que AmWay, Poster Boy® arrived right after you at 10:15 am.
Yeah David, it sucks when Congressmen actually read the Bills written in Congress.
They should just vote without reading the Bills.
heehee.. they and their staffs were free to read it… It probably would not have gone down to the wire like it did, except for their delaying and stalling for weeks to try to push the vote until after the July recess… over 400 amendments in the markup meetings…
It is a shame some of their staffers had to work late… especially after six years of hardly working at all…
3 of 4 global metrics show nearly flat temperature anomaly in the last decade
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/08/3-of-4-global-metrics-show-nearly-flat-temperature-anomaly-in-the-last-decade/
No rise in world temperatures for the past decade, UN’s top weather man admits in BBC news revelation that also concedes some scientists doubt climate change theory
http://poneke.wordpress.com/2008/04/06/nina/
Seems to be quite a bit of disagreement, yet the DimLibs want to ram ‘cap and trade down’ our throats and harm an already fragile economy.
It’s nothing but a tax and spend redistribution of money and power, the liars.
boxlock20,
Thank you for the March 2008 link, you posted at 10:41 am.
“It has been 10 years since the super El Niño of 1998 helped to spike global temperatures dramatically. Now since it appears we are in the opposite phase,. . .”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7329799.stm
““It has been 10 years since the super El Niño of 1998 helped to spike global temperatures dramatically. Now since it appears we are in the opposite phase,. . .”—cosmos
Right, temps go up and then down….imagine that! Only gullible chicken little types worry much about it, and of course political types trying to pull off a massive tax scheme.
JimJohnson
Posted June 28, 2009 at 10:20 am | Permalink
Chas
Posted June 28, 2009 at 10:12 am | Permalink
Dont forget to include AmWay in there, too, Phantom…
========================
Church is out early today.
===========================================
I would hope so… Service started at 8:30 bozo!!! Johnson, you are SOO DUMB!!!
“Hey Boxlicker…I love making you dance!!!”—the scumbag
And I you, looks who’s dancing to my tune now, ha.
Dance poodle boy, is my comment as well!
Today is a good day for baseball!
boxlock20 posted June 28, 2009 at 11:34 am
Right, temps go up and then down….imagine that!
—————
Actually temperatures show both natural variability, AND a gradual warming trend due to AGW. But boxlock doesn’t seem to be smart enough to understand the trend.
Johnson —-
Please show us all where I have ever said I am a Lutheran Pastor??? I have never said in what denomination I hold ordination… But, you can bet it’s one of those that I use for a link…
“Please show us all where I have ever said I am a Lutheran Pastor???”—Chas
It sure sounds from your post last night that’s what you were trying to infer.
Chas
Posted June 27, 2009 at 10:43 pm | Permalink
“I tell ya what Boxlies… I did a lot of supply years ago at Our Savior Lutheran down in Mulvane… I have preached at Christ Lutheran in Wichita… and many Sundays at St. Paul’s in Peabody… among others…. I am at a ELCA congregation next Sunday in Oklahoma….”
I don’t for a second believe you are a Lutheran Pastor…..no but instead you hold a matchbook cover ordination probably.
Boxlock, you are as DUMB as rocks… I listed some ELCA congregations where I have preached over the years.. YOU are dumb enough to jump to the illogical conclusion that I am a Lutheran Pastor…. But, I will give you a hint… I grew up in a large Lutheran congregation in Wichita…
I have NEVER said I am ordained Lutheran…
“Chas” –
Please don’t denigrate the intelligence of rocks by comparing them to “Boxlock20.”
Churches in Action >>>>
http://act.ucc.org/site/MessageViewer?em_id=12581.0&dlv_id=16421
Ooooops — Sorry bout that, Monkey… I will be more careful in the future… :-)
Police: TV pitchman Billy Mays found dead at home
Billy Mays, the burly, bearded television pitchman known for his boisterous hawking of products such as Orange Glo and OxiClean, has died. He was 50.
Allow four-to-six weeks for burial.
Gee, I sure do hate to interject some matters of importance into the daily contretemps……into matters of such magnitude as the size of the First Lady’s derriere (I mean, that’s REALLY important)…
I could do likewise by exulting about my own measurements. And if I were a narcissist, I would. I mean, I’d belch, “Jesus! Mary! Joseph! I’m not only ’statuesque’ or even ‘buxom.’ I’m not even what you’d call ‘voluptuous.’ ”
Hell no – this b–ch is massive-t-!!ed. And, oh, I just LOVE bein’ a grrrrrl.
But anyway, on to a more pressing matter……
‘Cause I’ve gone on record about mixing cruelty amidst tragedy – so I’m gonna spin that vinyl agin……..
In August of 2006, I was hospitalized for a near-catastrophic event. (I won’t elaborate here – but what the f— – you fine foke are intelligent enough to put two and, um, two together….)
Let us postulate here: Let us speculate that I didn’t survive on that sultry summer evening nearly three years ago.
Let us say that, after release one week later, some human rights dude and/or diva went on record (or to a right-to-life organization) and belched, “Everyone who ever said a mean thing to FilmFan, called her icky names, or date-raped her on 11/23/74 has blood on his/her hands today.”
Pardon my bluntness, what how in the hellola would that have gone over? Probably like a t–d in a punchbowl, I would imagine.
Four weeks ago today, I sat at this very computer and logged onto Kansas.com. Seconds later, a Kinko’s employee ran to my side, believing I was experiencing a heart attack. And in truth, that’s what grief does. It paralyzes one.
Within seconds, the hysterical accusations flew – from both sides. Some on one side failed to exude the necessary sensitivity (i.e., shutting the f–k up). Some on the other side accused me and everyone else who has said stupid things of outright murder. And I’m really angry at this.
Why? Because it’s not like I feel “nothing.” I was and remain repentant. Receiving forgiveness does not, in my adult-stage view, negate one’s actions. Dr. Tiller was certainly duty-bound to forgive. But he did. And for that I am humbly grateful.
But am I a “murderer?” Let me put it succinctly: You who would deem me as such are no better than those who equate aborting women with Molly Hatchett (the killer, not the rock group)……
Oops – typo! I meant to say, “Dr. Tiller was certainly NOT duty-bound to forgive….”
But anyway – my point is sound: Do I feel really, really awful in the wake of this despicable crime? You bet your frigging booty I do.
Do I equate myself and others with the “alleged” assassin? Not on your (right-to) life. Because if I did, I’d shove my head down the toilet after taking a nice, juicy, fetid dump. That’s how kindly I look upon this assassin and his murderous bretheren.
And the FBI will find them, mark my words. Scottie’s neighbors observed a rancid trail of comers and goers. They will check phone records; they will investigate S. Shannon and her Army of Gawd goons.
Equating me and many others with these cretinous savages is a vile offense. I’ve been really pi—- off for a while now – and I just had to “let it all out” – as the medical professionals say.
That is not to say I am not repentant. I am – and I will remain repentant. But it takes a really low-life scumbag to do what “the assassin” did here – and live with himself/herself afterwards. It takes the lowest of the low – something not even those menopausal harridans of Hays, Kansas in the 1970s could stoop to.
I’m not deeming them murderers today – any more than I’m condemning abortion patients.
‘Cause it ain’t “concern for the unborn” that’s driving Scottie’s bus – let us all be clear. Adding one whole half-inch to his one half of a half-inch – that’s what matters to him.
Anyway – I just had to vent my spleen today. I’m in a whole lot of pain. I don’t need the irrational cacaphony of zealots on either side muddying the already ugly waters.
Venting spleens – with fava beans and a nice Chianti.
Chas, you are the one that is “dumb as a box of rocks”.
If you can read, which most Pastors can, proving you aren’t one, I said, “I don’t for a second believe you are a Lutheran Pastor…..no but instead you hold a matchbook cover ordination probably”.
You are the one listing the Lutheran Churches, inferring some association. I know they wouldn’t have you.
And who ask you, Chimpbrain?
Box, it’s a free country… believe whatever you want… I know the truth of the matter… But if you xchoose not to believe it, then tough siht!! That still makes you a loser…. Climb down off your high horse…. Take a dip into reality for a change
“You are the one listing the Lutheran Churches, inferring some association. I know they wouldn’t have you.” [Boxorocks]
If thats what you believe, with no ingormation but your own stupidity, the you are — ONCE AGAIN — AS USUAL — VERY WRONG!!!
YOU ARE WRONG SO NUCH, IT’D HARD TO BELIEVE YOU EVEN TRY!! lol
Hey Chas, look for a little light on your keyboard lighted up….it means the ‘Cap Lock’ is on. Typing with it on makes you look like a dunce….oh, never mind you do anyway.
Out of here….off to points west to work this week.
Some of us do work.
Another example of the tenuous “science” that the AGW alarmist rhetoric is based upon and for which the OBAMA would like to see massive taxes placed on carbon producing businesses.
________________________
An Australian look at USHCN: 20th century trend is largely if not entirely an artefact arising from the “corrections”
28 06 2009
From environmentalist Jennifer Marohasy’s blog in Australia, please pay her a visit here – Anthony
There has been criticism of the potential for official weather stations in the USA to record artificially high temperatures because of the changing environments in which they exist, for example, new asphalt, new building or new air conditioning outlets. Meteorologist, Anthony Watts, has documented evidence of the problem and Canadian academic, Ross McKitrick, has attempted to calculate just how artificially elevated temperatures might be as a consequence.
A reader of this blog, Michael Hammer, recently studied the official data from the US official weather stations and in particular how it is adjusted after it has been collected. Mr Hammer concludes that the temperature rise profile claimed by the US government is largely if not entirely an artefact of the adjustments applied after the raw data is collected from the weather stations…
Clearly the shape of this graph bears no similarity at all to the graph shown in Figure 4. The graph does not even remotely correlate to the shape of the CO2 versus time graph. The warming was greatest in the 1930’s before CO2 started to rise rapidly. The rate of rise in 1920, the early 1930’s and the early 1950’s is significantly greater than anything in the last 30 years. Despite the rapid rise in CO2 since 1960, the 1970’s to early 1980’s was the time of the global cooling scare and looking at the graph in Figure 5 one can see why (almost 2F cooling over 50 years).
A linear least squares trend line, created using the Excel trend line function (Red trace) shows a small temperature rise of 0.09C per century which is far less than the rise claimed by AGW supporters and clearly of no concern. However, the data shown in figure 5 bears little if any resemblance to a linear function. One can always fit a linear trend line to any data but that does not mean the fitted line has any significance. For example, if instead I fit a second order trend line (a parabolic) the result is extremely different. That suggests a temperature peak around 1950 with an underlying cooling trend since. Which trend line is the more significant one? If there was really a strong underlying linear rise over the time period it should have shown up in the 2nd order trend line as well. This suggests that it is questionable whether any relevant underlying trend can be determined from the data.
It would appear that the temperature rise profile claimed by the adjusted data is largely if not entirely an artefact arising from the adjustments applied (as shown in Figure 3), not from the experimental data record. In fact, the raw data does not in any way support the AGW theory.
Based on this data, the US temperature data does not correlate with carbon dioxide levels. The warming over the last 3 decades is completely unremarkable and if present at all is significantly less than occurred in the 1930’s. It is questionable whether any long term temperature rise over the 20th century can be inferred from the data but if there is any it is far less than claimed by the AGW proponents.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/28/an-australian-look-at-ushcn-20th-century-trend-is-largely-if-not-entirely-an-artefact-arising-from-the-%E2%80%9Ccorrections%E2%80%9D/#more-8983
outlander–
I haven’t made up my mind either way on GlobWarming, so what you post may be correct.
However, how does that square with glacier loss and satellite measurements?
Well Capn, I know that satellite measurements of the troposphere show far less warming and some will argue cooling. As far as glacier retreat, I don’t know. In some places however, they are growing, and climate change is never evenly distributed.
I just think that there is ample reason to doubt the AGW alarmists and no pressing need to take drastic measures that will effect “the economy, stupid”.
http://science.nasa.gov/newhome/headlines/essd06oct97_1.htm
A link re: Satellite data.
I was surprised to see a graph the other day that showed a strong correlation between rising CO2 and temperature since 1940 . . . that’s not the surprising part.
If you look at that graph back to 1000, it showed temperature rising WITH NO RISE in CO2.
I think the strongest argument I’ve heard against the Global Warming threat is that nobody knows what caused the ice ages and the warming that occured in the past.
If you can’t explain the past, you can’t predict the future.
Box and JJ–
Chas is a pastor. This is not in question.
I’ve talked to him on several occasions, so has BlueJay, so has CF.
He is an ordained and practicing pastor.
On that point, there is no dispute.
CapnAmerica,
Re past ice ages and warming, the main theory is Milankovitch cycles plus positive feedbacks.
See Faq 6.1, and Chapter 6 for more details.
http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-wg1.htm
The faq’s also give overviews on some other basic points.
But there are a lot of scientists who think that the Milankovitch cycle (of Earth tilt and distance from the sun) is too small an effect to trigger Global glaciation or warming.
Ditto for sunspots.
Also, given the glacial maximums at which one time the Snowball Earth theory was supposed to have happened, Earth would be a very high albedo and so it could never warm up again.
But it did warm up again.
I’m not saying that Global Warming is bunk, like the deniers do, but I am saying that the science is not 100 percent clear on this either.
Also, given that the last Ice Age was 12,000 years ago, and we’re 11,000 years into this interglacial period, it might not be a bad thing that we’re heating up the globe with CO2.
It’s better than another Ice Age in a thousand years.
outlander,
Why are you posting an old satellite data link from 1997?
Satellite data shows a similar trend to ground-based data sets. See the comparison graphs
http://tamino.wordpress.com/2008/03/02/whats-up-with-that/
The U.S. (lower 48 states) is only about 2 percent of the total global area. You cannot conclude anything about “global” conditions by looking at only 2% of the area.
Suffice it to say that the most knowlegable scientists seem to be lining up on the side of the Global Warming threat, and that in itself should be very troubling to people.
Meanwhile the people against are all petroleum engineers or status quo business people who believe they won’t profit from green energy.
outlander
When is Anthony Watts going to release his new study, which would include data from 90 stations?
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/6/24/746197/-More-Proof-US-is-WarmingFrom-Global-Warming-Deniers
CapnAmerica,
And people like outlander will continue to believe anything and everything that Jennifer Marohasy, Anthony Watts, and similar ilk say.
dailykos Cosmos?
Jeesh. Capn, folks like Cosmos, who link “dailykos” on climate science matters yet criticize others freely for their sources are hardly convincing, are they?
Obama a loser not a winner if the Green scam passes in Congress.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090628/ap_on_an/us_obama_climate_analysis
After the billions the chimp-in-chief poured into Musharaff’s coffers, why couldn’t he get this kind of cooperation from Pakistan.
Obama’s the Man!
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090628/wl_nm/us_pakistan_violence_8
cosmos uses the highly inaccurate Milankovitch cycles to explain the past ice ages which occur at approximately 100,000 years according to the theory.
What the Milankovitch cycles really are is an illusion created by averaging together cycles lasting 80 and 120 thousand years. Mathematicians then averaged the cycles to make “convenient” numbers.
However, if one looks at the ice core record and other ways of tracing climate, the Milankovitch cycle has been wrong each of the past eight (8) cycles or about 800,000 years. Being wrong 8 for 8 is not a good record to be considered a sound theory.
If averaging sounds familiar (Milankovitch cycles), it is the same flawed method that the IPCC computer climate models use to ‘predict’ (cough) man-made co2-fueled climate.
There are events that we are absolutely certain that caused climate change. In 1783, the Iceland volcanic fissures exploding releasing massive amounts of particulates and gases (mainly sulfur dioxide) into the atmosphere. This releases was responsible for thousands of deaths, famine in Africa; all due to sudden decrease in temperature on a global scale.
The “Warmers” hate to talk about it, because it destroys their theory than the release of the puny amounts of co2 cannot compete with mother nature’s quantity of same.
Averaging temperatures is a juxtaposition of science. It is neither compliant with the laws of thermodynamics, but also flies in the face of science by correlation when co2 is linked with it.
Everyone knows that inconvenient measurements of temperature and co2 were thrown out of the database for the IPCC, politically driven non-science quest.
It’s why that IPCC needs computer climate models to cook their data, because it defies the law of physics.
outlander posted June 28, 2009 at 4:52 pm
dailykos Cosmos?
Jeesh. Capn, folks like Cosmos, who link “dailykos” on climate science matters yet criticize others freely for their sources are hardly convincing, are they?
—————–
Jeesh outlander. . . this blog only allows one link per post.
If you want to make multiple posts to list your friend Anthony Watts’ links, surfacestations, and NCDC’s link, go ahead.
I just posted the page that contained those multiple links.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/6/24/746197/-More-Proof-US-is-WarmingFrom-Global-Warming-Deniers
And when is Anthony Watts going to release his new study, which would include data from 90 stations?
LOL!
Regular is still having brain f@rts, and pushing E. G. Beck’s ridiculous CO2 claim.
#
cosmos_originally
Posted June 28, 2009 at 7:15 pm | Permalink
LOL!
Regular is still having brain f@rts, and pushing E. G. Beck’s ridiculous CO2 claim.
===============================
This is cosmos standard answer of ad hominem – clueless and on constant attack. Because cosmos has no clue and zero character.
E. G. Beck’s ridiculous CO2 claims are ridiculous.
Reg..did you expect any different? so many people here have proven than when they can’t discuss like adults, they resort to personal attacks.
It is really quite juvenile, isn’t it?
Heehee, very amusing story on Mr Watts in the Daily Kos…
Well Cosmos, at least Watts has integrity and is a scientist, as contrasted to the lib flame thrower on your esteemed climate science source, the dailykos. In fact, he sounds a bit like you. And probably less qualified.
Just pointing out your hypocrisy Nanook. Enough said.
Ok, here comes Cosmos with a slam on Watts that he found on one of his AGW alarmist sites. 5-4-3-2-1
I dunno, it sounds like Watts was hoist by his own petard….
Heehee, good old Daily Kos:
Saturday hate mail-apalooza
by kos
Sat Jun 27, 2009 at 11:18:04 AM PDT
Not a bad week, but this stuff starts getting repetitive after a while. But there was one piece of hate mail so brilliant, I almost wept at its beauty. So I decided it deserved the day to itself and a poll.
(favorite quote: “(remember global warming? no proof, just science and that makes it true for you liberals”)
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/6/27/747350/-Saturday-hate-mail-apalooza
Cosmos, don’t let me down.
Raptor,
If you believe that E. G. Beck’s CO2 claims are credible and scientific, why don’t you tell us where Beck published his claims?
DavidB posted June 28, 2009 at 7:59 pm
I dunno, it sounds like Watts was hoist by his own petard….
————–
Yep.
Watts also compared anomaly data sets that used different reference periods, but did not adjust for the different reference periods. Ooops!
Did you take Physics in college cosmos?
How about Chemistry?
Did you take a meteorology course?
Surely cosmos you can answer these simple questions without your usual evasiveness.
Raptor,
Perhaps you can explain what process(es) caused well-mixed CO2 levels to take the wild swings that E. G. Beck claims they took, as shown in this graph?
http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2006/10/more_nonsense_about_co2.php
Cosmos — it isnt nice to play with unarmed people… :-)
cosmos,
Did you take Physics in college cosmos?
How about Chemistry?
Did you take a meteorology course?
Republican = A devout believer in the free market theory who denies evolution because it’s just a theory.
I’m sad Billy Mays died. The guy was good at making you pay attention.
#
DavidB
Posted June 28, 2009 at 9:40 pm | Permalink
Republican = A devout believer in the free market theory who denies evolution because it’s just a theory.
——————–
False
I don’t deny evolution, I just think it is as straight forward as people think.
If it was straight forward and clear, then theories on origin of species and classification wouldn’t change every few years like it does. It is not a settled science, just like Climatology – there is much to learn that we do not know.
I just think it is as straight forward as people think.
should be
I just don’t think it is as straight forward as people think.
Chas posted June 28, 2009 at 9:27 pm
Cosmos — it isnt nice to play with unarmed people… :-)
——————-
LOL!
True, but it’s fun.
Since Raptor seemed to suggest that E. G. ridiculous CO2 claims were valid, I just want to see if Raptor will defend/explain Beck’s claims.
So cosmos,
What science classes did you take in college?
Chemistry? Physics? Meteorology? Geology?
Well send the old battleaxe out to meet me there bawksy.
Maybe she’d like to meet a real man.
I see that the ‘zero substance’ boys are out playing with themselves tonight.
BlueJay sings….
He’s a P U N K
Bawks as empty as parkay.
NO showwwwww
Ah bawks resembles that remark there James.
What do you got over there on North Oliver?
Regular,
Note how the ‘zero substance’ boys are so insecure about their own manhood they have to make remarks about my wife, as if I’d take any of it seriously.
I do like watching them make complete fools of themselves the eunuchs.
BlueJay puts on the music and Bawksy dances.
I so own you. Doubt I could get much for you though.
Boxlock just out and out punked the fool BlowJ@B and can anytime because he’s too stupid to learn, ha.
Hey BlowJ@b, who was it out standing in a cold parking lot in the middle of winter playing with himself while I was warm, drinking hot coffee and laughing my butt off at you thinking about it.
You fool!
SOME culture warrior you are.
“Go ahead, call me out! I won’t show up. THAT’LL teach ya!”
PS, Even my kid says you’re a punk.
“PS, Even my kid says you’re a punk.”
Your kid laughed at you and thought it was funny you got punked until you intimidated him, remember. You even said so. One of these days he won’t let that happen anymore and he’ll get his hands dirty cleaning you up.
How old is your kid 14, maybe 15 and he’s smarter than you, and you know it. You are a loser BlowJ and you deserve every bit of your own misery.
Got a run and get some sleep, I have a very expensive piece of equipment I sold to install tomorrow morning. What are you going to be doing BlowJ@b, playing with yourself I would guess just like every other day.
I’m bored –
good bnight; good luck; god bless —
whatever you conceive god to be…
blessings all….
special blessings on this great nation —
so mote it be!!
No bawks it actually came down that me and my son offered you a second chance to show up and you didn’t.
Thanks for helping me teach my son about Republicans and Christians! He learned that evil retreats when forcibly confronted.
He learned he has an immature idiot for a father, and a bum.
Chas
Posted June 28, 2009 at 11:34 am | Permalink
JimJohnson
Posted June 28, 2009 at 10:20 am | Permalink
Chas
Posted June 28, 2009 at 10:12 am | Permalink
Dont forget to include AmWay in there, too, Phantom…
========================
Church is out early today.
===========================================
I would hope so… Service started at 8:30 bozo!!! Johnson, you are SOO DUMB!!!
==========================
So Chas you work 90 minutes per week?
8:30 service
10:12 blogging
Boxlock20
Posted June 28, 2009 at 11:59 am | Permalink
“Please show us all where I have ever said I am a Lutheran Pastor???”—Chas
It sure sounds from your post last night that’s what you were trying to infer.
Chas
Posted June 27, 2009 at 10:43 pm | Permalink
“I tell ya what Boxlies… I did a lot of supply years ago at Our Savior Lutheran down in Mulvane… I have preached at Christ Lutheran in Wichita… and many Sundays at St. Paul’s in Peabody… among others…. I am at a ELCA congregation next Sunday in Oklahoma….”
I don’t for a second believe you are a Lutheran Pastor…..no but instead you hold a matchbook cover ordination probably.
======================
Thanks Box, you beat me to the answer.
Chas lied again.
SSDD.
Uh huh.
What did your wife, family, the blog learn about you bawksy?
You can blow but you’re no show.
Well, unless someone puts on the music. THEN you can dance.
BlueJay
Posted June 28, 2009 at 10:24 pm | Permalink
BlueJay puts on the music and Bawksy dances.
I so own you. Doubt I could get much for you though.
====================================
Poster Boy® brags about the ‘POWER’ he has on a blog, or so he thinks.
Which explains why he is here all the time – it’s the only time he feels like he has any power.
“You can blow but you’re no show.
Well, unless someone puts on the music. THEN you can dance.”—BlowJ@b
I did exactly as I pleased, and DID SO WITH YOU. And you know it.
And as for dancing….yeah I am, all over you BlowJ, all over you.
Night BlowJ, and think about it.
Regular claims that the release of the puny amounts of co2 cannot compete with mother nature’s quantity of same.
100 lbs of gasoline in your car is converted to 300 lbs of CO2 (because it is mixed with O2). Multiply that times all the cars on the road today.
Whatever it is, it ain’t puny.
BTW, sulphur dioxide from volcanoes would lead to cooler temps. That has nothing to do with CO2 however.
In fact, some slightly mad climate scientists have speculated that we could reverse temporarilly the effects of CO2 warming by deliberately pumping massive amounts of SO2 into the atmosphere.
See this month’s Atlantic Monthly.
JimJohnson
Posted June 28, 2009 at 10:49 pm | Permalink
Boxlock20
Posted June 28, 2009 at 11:59 am | Permalink
“Please show us all where I have ever said I am a Lutheran Pastor???”—Chas
It sure sounds from your post last night that’s what you were trying to infer.
Chas
Posted June 27, 2009 at 10:43 pm | Permalink
“I tell ya what Boxlies… I did a lot of supply years ago at Our Savior Lutheran down in Mulvane… I have preached at Christ Lutheran in Wichita… and many Sundays at St. Paul’s in Peabody… among others…. I am at a ELCA congregation next Sunday in Oklahoma….”
I don’t for a second believe you are a Lutheran Pastor…..no but instead you hold a matchbook cover ordination probably.
======================
Thanks Box, you beat me to the answer.
Chas lied again.
SSDD.
============================================
WHERE is the lie, Johnson??? YOU and Boxlicker are the two liars here… READ idiot… I preach in Lutheran churches… Doesnt mean I am one….
I dont know about your church services… Ours usually last about 45-50 minutes… Why is that such an important thing to you?? You seem terribly obsessed with what I do… Why would a LIAR like you be interested in such a thing???
All you are is a LIAR Johnson… government… religion… ad hominems… education… EVERYTHING you post is a lie waiting to happen!!!
FUGG OFF you slime bucket LIAR!!! You mess up the Blog for others…
CapnAmerica
Posted June 28, 2009 at 11:08 pm | Permalink
Regular claims that the release of the puny amounts of co2 cannot compete with mother nature’s quantity of same.
100 lbs of gasoline in your car is converted to 300 lbs of CO2 (because it is mixed with O2). Multiply that times all the cars on the road today.
===========================================
Humans expel about 22,043,000,000 pounds of co2 daily. That’s 22 billion pounds per day.
Watcha gonna do Capn?
Have everyone stop breathing out?
Of course, add in animals, soil, oceans, your favorite carbonated beverage….
Chas, you’ve lost it again.
Please seek out a mental health professional for help.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 28, 2009 at 11:08 pm |
In fact, some slightly mad climate scientists have speculated that we could reverse temporarilly the effects of CO2 warming by deliberately pumping massive amounts of SO2 into the atmosphere.
See this month’s Atlantic Monthly.
———————————
I don’t know about you, but I’m not fond of acid rain which is exactly what SO2 (sulfur dioxide) would cause and has caused.
Besides, if you are all for SO2 being released, you should get behind your friendly coal plant and allow them to release SO2 in massive amounts into the air, so there can be cooling or not.
“I did exactly as I pleased, and DID SO WITH YOU. And you know it.”
Oh I don’t think so.
You see? The standard here for vetting bloggers was set by Hank Price who we lately know as “HLP” among several other nics. HE put out the call for meetups.
I don’t know of a single progressive liberal blogger who backed down and I have met more bloggers than any other poster to this forum.
And so “bawks” it seems you fail the test established by your own fellow minded.
You can blow. But ya can’t show.
And that is your fame here. You were the “man” who wasn’t there. Oh that and your bad links, distortions, and lies.
Four years at this and I am STILL expert at letting the air out of wind bags. Probably you read me here before you dared post and explanatory of why you are afraid of me.
I don’t have to meet you to know I make you afraid.
#
Regular
Posted June 28, 2009 at 10:03 pm
So cosmos,
What science classes did you take in college?
Chemistry? Physics? Meteorology? Geology?
BlueJay is afraid of me. He wouldn’t even slow down his truck long enough to wave “hi.”
BlueJay the smack talker…
I’ve met you on my terms James McCluer.
Name yours.
Can I bring a camera?
#
BlueJay
Posted June 29, 2009 at 12:07 am | Permalink
I’ve met you on my terms James McCluer.
Name yours.
Can I bring a camera?
————————-
You bet, bring a video camera.
Anything you can Ryan Remil.
Yeah, you met me on your terms, lmao!
What a chicken, yellow coward, spineless, gutless, lily-livered spittoon moldy cr@p filled receptacle you are.
roflmao!
Oh too good to be true.
I don’t need any seconds James and I don’t want any.
You’re the disturbed menace of this blog and it would be my high honor to show everyone what you really are.
#
BlueJay
Posted June 29, 2009 at 12:18 am | Permalink
Oh too good to be true.
I don’t need any seconds James and I don’t want any.
You’re the disturbed menace of this blog and it would be my high honor to show everyone what you really are.
——————-
No doubt Ryan Remil will be using a telephoto lens. :)
Jesus H Christ do we really have to go over the same discussion day after day after day?
45-minute church service?
Only at McChurch, where a drive-thru window is now available.
Say Regular, be careful if you give him the full-moon shot.
He may never leave.
#
Political_mama
Posted June 29, 2009 at 12:21 am | Permalink
Jesus H Christ do we really have to go over the same discussion day after day after day?
—————–
Ask Ryan Remil, he’s the one that always starts this cr@p, daily.
Get rid of him and the blog will be reasonably sane.
Gonna call in psycho Nathaniel like you did last time lamo?
Poster Boy® is here to stay. What else does he have?
#
BlueJay
Posted June 29, 2009 at 12:23 am | Permalink
Gonna call in psycho Nathaniel like you did last time lamo?
—————–
At 76 inches tall and 240 pounds with very little extra fat, I don’t need a backup Junior.
(chortles)
BlueJay,
You might have missed it, but I have extended the offer of civil debate to everyone. You are included.
Calling me psycho here adds nothing to the discussion. Nevermind the fact that I have not even posted on this thread till now.
I would appreciate it if you would refrain from calling me names and I will do the same for you.
Ya looked a little…bent… to me James.
Like you do here?
“I would appreciate it if you would refrain from calling me names and I will do the same for you.”
Thanks Nathaniel, the blog knows otherwise.
#
BlueJay
Posted June 29, 2009 at 12:30 am | Permalink
Ya looked a little…bent… to me James.
Like you do here?
———————
I am a good actor, aren’t I? :)
BlueJay,
You do not speak for the blog. You speak only for yourself.
I have offered civility. Do you want it or not?
“I am a good actor, aren’t I? :)”
You mean here? Yes, I’ll give you that.
But I’ve met you in person. You are a broken, crippled old man conserving the compassion of this nation to your own sorry self.
Tiresome.
I’ll get that pic of you for the blog without your cooperation James.
I have a knack for destroying cons.
#
BlueJay
Posted June 29, 2009 at 12:48 am | Permalink
Tiresome.
I’ll get that pic of you for the blog without your cooperation James.
I have a knack for destroying cons.
——————————————
So you are afraid to meet me?
Just don’t get caught stalking – I have policemen that are friends. :)
The fact was, and the truth is BlueJay….you aren’t worth meeting. You are worth the time, you aren’t worth the gas, you aren’t worth the breath it would take, you don’t generate the interest to do so.
You are a immature adolescent that issues challenges to meet in parking lots to settle differences like a stupid emotion driven teenager. I have NO interest in interacting in those circumstances.
And I got tired of your stupid challenges to meet or I, according to you, was less than whatever. So I did something about it….I make a complete fool of you. I let you tell me what you wanted and then I ignored you. You were so stupid I had to tell you what happened to you even after it happened. BlueJay you are a dunce and not much smarter since.
It may sound like I am being harsh, well I am but for your own good. You should consider me a friend as nothing will change for your worthless existence unless you make it happen and you are to lazy and immature to do so.
“You are worth the time,” should of course read ‘You AREN’T worth the time’
But everyone knew that.
For any participants in this forum who have no idea what “Boxlock20″ keeps ranting about –
Back some time ago he agreed to meet up with “BlueJay” for coffee and conversation. “Boxlock20″ chickened out.
As noted, this was quite a while back, sometime (as I recall) between January 20, 1777 and January 20, 1781, during Thomas Jefferson’s presidency.
“Back some time ago he agreed to meet up with “BlueJay” for coffee and conversation. “Boxlock20? chickened out.”—-the Chimpbrain
Absolutely a lie! BlowJ@b challenged to meet in a parking lot at the Dillions at Central and Rock Rd. at NOON! Sounds like a bad Spaghetti Western movie doesn’t it? Absolutely nothing was said about coffee or conversation. BlowJ@b said he was going to “set me straight”, according to his idea of how things should be.
I got tired of hearing it after the 3rd, 4th. 5th. 6th, etc time and said okay and went about my adult business.
He stands in the parking lot for 20 or 30 min. according to his own statement until he had to use the bathroom and went in Dillions and after even more time wondered off to waste the rest of his day.
I punked the punk. And laughted about it.
And, as they say, those “are the facts, just the facts”.
BlueJay is a goon.
Not a very mature or smart goon I might add.