Registered?
Commenting on WE Blog now requires you to be a Kansas.com member. Use the links above to register, if you haven't already, or to log in.Contact us
Follow us
Daily Archives
-
Recent Comments
- Pleefer on Open thread 11/22
- cosmos_originally on Open thread 11/22
- Phantom on Open thread 11/22
- Phantom on Open thread 11/22
- Rage on Open thread 11/22
- Pleefer on Open thread 11/22
- Pleefer on Open thread 11/22
- cosmos_originally on Open thread 11/22
- Rage on Open thread 11/22
- Rage on Open thread 11/22
395 Comments
Leave it to the US Chamber of Commerce to try to ruin the economy. They figure that the stimulus money should be used to stimulate the economies of foreign nations, so America can save billions. I’m supposing they are forgetting that the purpose of the stimulus is to invest in America and create jobs, not line their pockets. However the Chamber leans heavily Republican and we all know that Republicans aren’t terribly bright when it comes to economic issues, just look at the stupid comments Tiahrt is making.
US Chamber of Commerce pushes to end ‘Buy American’ rules
http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/06/11/us-chamber-of-commerce-pushes-to-end-buy-american-rules/
Anyone see the KAKE News story about neighborhood blight on the News last night? (video on their web site) Sandy, the lady they interviewed was standing on the porch of our Ministry House! How cool is that? The converted garage right behind that house is now our new Food Distribution Center.
Concealed Carry: If You’re Interested in Preventing Hate Crimes, Let’s Stop them Before They Happen
Twenty-five years ago, Tom Palmer and a male companion were threatened by a group of 20 or so young males on an empty street in San Jose, California. The group shouted anti-gay epithets and made death threats.
Palmer and his companion ran, and the attackers gave chase.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-barron/concealed-carry-if-youre_b_213912.html
No Naval Swords for U.S.N.A. Graduation this year – Threat to the Dear Leader Inside the Beltway – Washington Times
No Weapons for Anyone
From today’s you couldn’t make it up if you tried file…….Obama’s protectors have ordered graduating Midshipmen….and I suppose Commissioned Officers through Flag rank…to leave their swords at home. Full Dress White includes “wear sword”. More to the point…those badges of office have been earned in a manner Obongo and his minions just wouldn’t begin to understand. Important traditions that inspire are kind of lost on the red banner crowd, apparently.
Further, ceremonial swords never seemed to bother the Secret Service for any previous President. And before World War II, the swords were not particularly “ceremonial”, I’ve seen some of those blades, boarding actions did occur on the China Station pre-war against river pirates, warlords, etc. Those swords were worn not just to graduation, but to Inaugurations, in the receiving line at the White House afterward, to the Inaugural Ball. Somehow nobody gave it a second thought. Somehow even Presidents in the past didn’t presume to specify items of uniform.
But of course, what worked for Harry Truman, Ronald Reagan, F.D.R., the Bushes, T.R., any other rational non-cult leader…..doesn’t work for this former state senator anointed by the Chicago machine.
http://www.gatheringofeagles.org/view720247m2851579998.html
The Feel-Good Story from Yesterday
GREEN BAY, Wis. – Ten-year-old Kennedy Corpus has a rock-solid excuse for missing the last day of school: a personal note to her teacher from President Barack Obama.
Her father, John Corpus of Green Bay, stood to ask Obama about health care during the president’s town hall-style meeting at Southwest High School on Thursday. He told Obama that his daughter was missing school to attend the event and that he hoped she didn’t get in trouble.
“Do you need me to write a note?” Obama asked. The crowd laughed, but the president was serious.
On a piece of paper, he wrote: “To Kennedy’s teacher: Please excuse Kennedy’s absence. She’s with me. Barack Obama.” He stepped off the stage to hand-deliver the note — to Kennedy’s surprise.
“I thought he was joking until he started walking down,” Kennedy said after the event, showing off the note in front of a bank of television cameras. “It was like the best thing ever.”
The fourth-grader at Aldo Leopold elementary in Green Bay already knew what she was going to do with the note: frame it along with her ticket to the event. She said she’d make a copy for her teacher.
Kennedy said she had never seen Obama before. “He’s really nice,” she said.
Well, well, well. Turns out the Holocaust Museum shooter hates Christians and conservatives just as much as he hates Jews and Blacks. Of course we can’t let facts get in the way of a good story. After all some posters on this site the day of the shooting were claiming he was a Free Republic posting right wing Christian fanatic.
Today’s dispatch from “the responsible white seperatist community.”
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/11/responsible-white-separatist/
Next we’ll hear from the “compassionate rapist community.”
You can’t make this stuff up!
CONs’ll out-crazy even themselves. Every time!
Sorry Chris.
“Countdown” was all over the story last night.
The museum shooter IS indeed, one of yours.
How many clues do we need, really?
He’s an old, cranky bigot who solves problems with guns. Classic earmark con.
maggotpunk: The buy American concept was meant to buy North American for the economies of Canada and the US are so intertwined that to exclude them risks our ability to export more to one place, than we do to all of the EU. Or in another way, more to Canada than China, Japan, France, Mexico, Germany and the UK combined. When it was noticed that some pipe made Canada was ripped up from a site because it wasn’t made in the US, they responded with a resolution by Canadian mayors to ban American imports. Canada is the largest customer for 35 states and their relatialtion will hurt, reports of cancelled order for pumps, construction equipment and electonics are already being felt by American manufacturers and there is also a move to levy a surcharge/export tax on all energy exports, hydro, natual gas and oil and then recind their $13 billion offer to the US carmakers as part of Obama’s bailout package. That WILL hurt. Currently there is a slight advantage in the balance of trade favoring Canada, but that is mostly overvalued energy costs. In manufacutred/machined goods and services America enjoys a huge surplus. Mexico or China, Canada ain’t. Their banks are in fine shape,the place has been running suspluses for years and can weather any trade war we start. I know these folks, they generally are slow to anger, but if the G&M and other papers are accurate, they are now.
#
BlueJay
Posted June 12, 2009 at 7:19 am | Permalink
Sorry Chris.
“Countdown” was all over the story last night.
The museum shooter IS indeed, one of yours.
How many clues do we need, really?
_______________
“Countdown” with Keith Olbermann. Isn’t he the Rush Limbaugh of the left? Oh yeah the new leftist leader. What are his TV ratings. Last I heard they were just a blimp on the chart. I sure his show will get some of the bailout money.
Monkey has just been outed.
http://www.drudgereport.com/flashbrn.htm
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/11/responsible-white-separatist/
_________________________________________
ThinkProgress?? What is it with you people?
How about logging on to ThinkForYourself.com
Washington, D.C. – Congressman Ron Paul’s Federal Reserve Transparency Act, HR 1207, has reached and surpassed the level of 218 cosponsors in the House of Representatives, which means it is now cosponsored by a majority of the members.
The 218th cosponsor was Dennis Kucinich (OH-10), and the bill has since received its 222nd cosponsor.
“The tremendous grass-roots and bipartisan support in Congress for HR 1207 is an indicator of how mainstream America is fed up with Fed secrecy,” said Congressman Paul. “I look forward to this issue receiving greater public exposure.”
Hearings on Federal Reserve transparency are expected within the next month, as part of the Financial Services Committee’s series of hearings on regulatory reform.
Heckler
Posted June 12, 2009 at 6:43 am | \l “comment-600174″
No Naval Swords for U.S.N.A. Graduation this year – Threat to the Dear Leader Inside the Beltway – Washington Times
Heckler my question on this is how valid is the source of this source? Will this turn out like the truthfulness of Obama order the detainees of Afghanistan be read their Miranda rights?
When it was President G.W. Bush that ordered that some of the detainees in Afghanistan be read their Miranda rights.
That has the flavor of the next article will be a detailed explanation of how the check is in the mail.
“WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama has tapped four big Democratic Party donors for plum ambassadorships in Europe and Latin America”
WOw. Change we can believe in. yeah,right.
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss
“WOw. Change we can believe in. yeah,right.
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss
But much worse….a Marxist and a fascist.
Petraeus: Afghan Violence Hits Highest Level Since 2001
WASHINGTON — The violence that has surged for two years in Afghanistan reached a new high last week, and more difficulty lies ahead, the United States’ top war zone commander said Thursday.
Gen. David Petraeus said the number of attacks in Afghanistan over the last week hit the highest level since the December 2001 fall of the Taliban.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,525990,00.html
http://barbadosfreepress.wordpress.com/2009/06/10/what-the-u-s-naval-academy-graduates-ordered-to-remove-swords-for-president-obamas-speech/
—————-
Heckler it would appear there is a difference of opinion as to what is happening here. The link above has pictures and also commentary about the wearing of swords. We will have to wait and see if they are on or off when Obama is there.
Writer wants evidence. It’s all over the internet for the curious.
Thanks for the post.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2268508/posts
———-
This blog has some interesting comments by service men and women as well as some pictures that show a real leader with his own troops and also as a visitor to other countries.
#
Chrisfrommactown
Posted June 12, 2009 at 7:09 am | Permalink
Well, well, well. Turns out the Holocaust Museum shooter hates Christians and conservatives just as much as he hates Jews and Blacks. Of course we can’t let facts get in the way of a good story. After all some posters on this site the day of the shooting were claiming he was a Free Republic posting right wing Christian fanatic.
==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==
http://tinyurl.com/nmpl6y
Gen. David Petraeus said the number of attacks in Afghanistan over the last week hit the highest level since the December 2001 fall of the Taliban.
_____________________________________
Dare we say,
Obama has turned Afghanistan into a . . . Quagmire!
Obama ousts AmeriCorps’ IG who investigated friend
WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama says he has lost confidence in the inspector general who investigates AmeriCorps and other national service programs and has told Congress he is removing him from the position.
Obama’s move follows an investigation by IG Gerald Walpin finding misuse of federal grants by a nonprofit education group led by Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson, who is an Obama supporter and former NBA basketball star.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090612/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_national_service_inspector_general
Events of the past two weeks have convinced me of this salient point:
The world’s problems – ALL of ‘em – would be solved if men would re-assume their rightful places of authority. It’s us uppity wimmin – and our propensity for flappin’ our jaws about all and sundry profundities – that’s got the world in a quagmire.
Day-um – those Phelps dudes really set me a’reelin’. I guess I lived in Missouri too long, and I forgot what a real man is….
Bottom line: The AmeriCorps IG accuses prominent Obama supporter of misusing AmeriCorps grant money. Prominent Obama supporter has to pay back more than $400,000 of that grant money. Obama fires AmeriCorps IG.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Whats-behind-Obamas-sudden-firing-of-the-AmeriCorps-inspector-general-47877797.html
A REAL man regards a woman like he regards the seat of power. It ain’t somethin’ you negotiate – it’s somethin’ you TAKE! If she don’t fall in line, ya drag her around the house by her hair. If she keeps speakin’ her mind, you slap her around until she shut the f–k up!
And if she locks up on you, you punch her in the face ’til she unlocks.
My goodness, I’ve been really sent a-reelin’ by Freddie’s fatboys. They just turned me ON!!!!
In fact, I’ll bet those Phelps progeny copulate like something straight out of “Lady Cab Driver” – a song from Prince’s “1999″ album……
Every, well….um…..how delicate to put this….every, oh gosh – how should I say this…
Every “exertion” is punctuated by guttural assertions of authority – and the wimmin topple like bowling pins…..
FilmFan,
Shouldn’t you be preparing lunch or cleaning house?
;-)
“POW”! – B–ch – I’m tellin’ you – don’t make no noise this time! Wimmin ain’t supposed to make noize – they’re supposed to lie back and think of Topekie!”
“A-A-A-A-R-R-R-G-G-H!” – Oh, baby! I’m a star tah-naht! The Little Dipper’s here – and he gonna giv it to ya!”
“O-O-O-O-O-O-U-G-H-Y-A-Y-U-S-S!” – Woeman – you better git in that bayud and get ready to receive! ‘Cause yer gonna be reborn tonahgt! And yer gonna git the best two inches and twenty seconds of yer sublimated life!”
And so on and so forth…..
Oh, I’m so bad. But when I’m inspired, it tends to inspire me. And inform me. I just cain’t help it. Nearly two weeks ago, I saw real men for the first time in my life……
And it turned me ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Just go back and look at Wednesday’s thread about the Holocaust shooting and you’ll see that for every post saying Brunn is a con, it is countered with a more convincing post stating the opposite.
Any rational person would conclude that Brunn has no party affiliation or coherent ideology except hate. Anyone making the claim he is a con or a lib is equally insane as Brunn.
PMS is getting the best of flimflam. lol
#
ANTI
Posted June 12, 2009 at 10:40 am | Permalink
Bottom line: The AmeriCorps IG accuses prominent Obama supporter of misusing AmeriCorps grant money. Prominent Obama supporter has to pay back more than $400,000 of that grant money. Obama fires AmeriCorps IG.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Whats-behind-Obamas-sudden-firing-of-the-AmeriCorps-inspector-general-47877797.html
__________________
Obama probably wants ACORN to be the new Americorps. They’ll be wearing brown shirts and black boots.
Filmfan I think a return trip to your doc to change the meds is in order. You have slipped over the edge it appears.
Sorry you have never had a real man in your life. Maybe an attitude adjustment would help attrack one.
attrack = attract
sorry
OK this is another one of those its not a lie but neither is it a whole truth. Yes the policy of prohibiting the swords is in effect. BUT it has nothing to do with Obama. It has been in effect since after 9-11.
Here is the write up and I agree that Obama should resend it.
But it was not because of Obama or his protectors.
But then the truth is not a good weapon at times so lets make up a lie and hope no one actually check for the truth.
“http://moelane.com/2009/05/22/usna-ceremonial-swords-on-the-prohibited-list-since-after-911/”
If you saw “http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/21/inside-the-beltway-97423759/” about how midshipmen’s ceremonial swords were on the prohibited list for graduation ceremonies, you were probably not pleased about it. Neither was I – but I checked with the Public Affairs office for the Naval Academy, and they informed me that this policy was put into place in response to 9/11. It is, bluntly, a stupid policy – if our midshipmen cannot be trusted to not assassinate the President, we’re in much worse trouble than we thought – but it’s also not the administration’s fault.
I encourage President Obama to change this policy and give his officers their swords back. We are citizens of a Republic, after all – they are not subjects, and he is not a king
On this date, Jun 12th, record setting temperatures for Wichita Kansas
High: 105 °F (1953)
Low: 48 °F (1903)
writerdog
Nice digging. I bow before your awesomeness!!
I buzzed the Times article and believed it.
I hate crap stories like that. But that’s one of the pitfalls of the intertubes I guess.
So, did the cons adopt the RWE position that ‘Obama has no birthcertifcate’, or did the RWE adopt the position from the cons? Incidentally, some whacked out repub congressman from Fl. introduced a bill for the birthcertificate to be produced.
http://forecast.weather.gov/showsigwx.php?warnzone=TXZ239&warncounty=TXC479&firewxzone=TXZ239&local_place1=2+Miles+ENE+Laredo+TX&product1=Heat+Advisory
This kid was one of cheney/bush’s woist of the woist?
“LONDON (Reuters) – An African detainee held at the U.S. prison camp at Guantanamo Bay since he was a teenager has been released without charge after more than seven years in captivity, his lawyers said on Thursday.
Mohammed El Gharani, a Chadian citizen, was freed five months after a U.S. federal judge ordered him released having reviewed the evidence against him and ruled that there was nothing to suggest he was ever an “enemy combatant.”
Lawyers for Gharani said he was the youngest detainee to be released from Guantanamo, having been seized in 2001 when he was 14.
But the Pentagon disputes his age, saying they believed he was now 23, and that there were others held at Guantanamo Bay over the past seven years who had been younger.
“Our records indicate that he is 23 and that he arrived at Guantanamo when he was 16,” said Navy Commander Jeffrey Gordon, a Pentagon spokesman. He said there was no birth certificate for Gharani but that his age had been established “by other means.”
The kid doesn’t have a birth certificate, watch out cons, he might be our next president!
A RWE is just a con that crossed over the line.
Mighty mighty quiet.
http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/realtime/mdi_igr/512/
“Heckler” admits –
“I buzzed the Times article and believed it.
I hate crap stories like that. But that’s one of the pitfalls of the intertubes I guess.”
As “Boxlock20″ taught us earlier this morning, you CONs tend to go off half-cocked (in a nice way, I mean) a lot more than not.
“WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama says he has lost confidence in the inspector general who investigates AmeriCorps and other national service programs and has told Congress he is removing him from the position.
Obama’s move follows an investigation by IG Gerald Walpin finding misuse of federal grants by a nonprofit education group led by Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson, who is an Obama supporter and former NBA basketball star.
Walpin was criticized by the acting U.S. attorney in Sacramento for the way he handled an investigation of Johnson and St. HOPE Academy, a nonprofit group that received hundreds of thousands of dollars in federal grants from the Corporation for National and Community Service. The corporation runs the AmeriCorps program”
Change you can believe in. HAHA! Meet the new boss, same as the old bass.
“Anyone making the claim he is a con or a lib is equally insane as Brunn.”
“Rush Limbaugh on Holocaust museum shooter: “This guy is a leftist if anything”"
In his own words:
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200906110014
Do you actually read someone post or just read it in your slanted mind before it is written or posted? Film fan is talking about the thoughts of Fred Phelps and his group of inbreeds.
The response from Anti is to go back to the stove or clean the house!
She talks about a male mindset stated by the Phelps that is taken from the cave man handbook for handling a woman. lock her in a closet and drag her by her hair.
Slap her for expressing her opinion and bed her to keep her happy.
okobserver
Posted June 12, 2009 at 11:12 am | \l “comment-600284″
Filmfan I think a return trip to your doc to change the meds is in order. You have slipped over the edge it appears.
Sorry you have never had a real man in your life. Maybe an attitude adjustment would help attrack one.
Then OKO said as much that if she wants a real man, Fan should accept being slapped around and being a life support system for a female body part. Bare foot and naked at the stove. That is what Fan was talking about, that is what the Phelps was saying!
Now, now, “DavidB” 00
Limbaugh isn’t “…equally insane…” as anyone.
He’s alone in his his own insane division.
Heavyweight, I suspect.
Obama ousts AmeriCorps’ IG who investigated friend
By ANN SANNER and PETE YOST, Associated Press Writers Ann Sanner And Pete Yost, Associated Press Writers – 1 hr 21 mins ago
WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama says he has lost confidence in the inspector general who investigates AmeriCorps and other national service programs and has told Congress he is removing him from the position.
Obama’s move follows an investigation by IG Gerald Walpin finding misuse of federal grants by a nonprofit education group led by Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson, who is an Obama supporter and former NBA basketball star.
Walpin was criticized by the acting U.S. attorney in Sacramento for the way he handled an investigation of Johnson and St. HOPE Academy, a nonprofit group that received hundreds of thousands of dollars in federal grants from the Corporation for National and Community Service. The corporation runs the AmeriCorps program.
“It is vital that I have the fullest confidence in the appointees serving as inspectors general,” Obama said in a letter Thursday to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Vice President Joe Biden, who also serves as president of the Senate. “That is no longer the case with regard to this inspector general.”
The president didn’t offer any more explanation, but White House Counsel Gregory Craig, in a letter to Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, cited the U.S. attorney’s criticism of Walpin to an integrity committee for inspectors general.
“We are aware of the circumstances leading to that referral and of Mr. Walpin’s conduct throughout his tenure and can assure you that the president’s decision was carefully considered,” Craig wrote.
Grassley had written Obama a letter pointing to a law requiring that Congress be given the reasons an IG is fired. He cited a Senate report saying the requirement is designed to ensure that inspectors general are not removed for political reasons.
Grassley said Walpin had identified millions of dollars in AmeriCorps funds that were wasted or misspent and “it appears he has been doing a good job.”
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090612/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_national_service_inspector_general
The response from Anti is to go back to the stove or clean the house!
===========================
Writerdog,
I was joking, hence the smiley face.
I see LJ beat me to it. Good man.
outlander
Posted June 12, 2009 at 11:47 am | Permalink
I see LJ beat me to it. Good man.
——————————-
I beat ya both!
#
ANTI
Posted June 12, 2009 at 11:45 am | Permalink
The response from Anti is to go back to the stove or clean the house!
===========================
Writerdog,
I was joking, hence the smiley face.
——————-
Sometimes you have to biotch slap Dawg to get him to see straight.
Oh, and ANTI beat LJ to it. I gotta start reading up before posting.
See!
“writerdog” –
A little sense of perspective:
We’re dealing with extreme CON wing-nuts in this forum.
The other day their favorite boy bravely stepped out of their solid ranks of wing-nuttery and courageously declared the Phred Felps clan “inconsiderate.”
They’re weakening!
Monkeyhawk
Posted June 12, 2009 at 11:52 am | Permalink
=======================================
Hittin’ the Boone’s Farm a little early, eh Monkeyhawk?
George H.W. Bush is getting ready to jump out of an airplane to celebrate his 85th birthday. I hope I’m that spry if/when I reach that age.
Go get ‘em Pappy!
Don’t you just hate those Muslim Imans in their mosques praying to Allah for the death of the President?
http://crooksandliars.com/john-amato/pastor-drake-prays-obamas-death-im-not
I wonder if the FBI had any agents in that mosque to root out American hating terrorists who want to harm our President?
Anti your response was in jest but it also fit right into the mindset that Fan was talking about. And I and maybe other did not take it as you were joking considering the topic at hand. Sometime things can be joked about and made light of in a serious matter.
But then since it is a serious matter it should be given its due.
But it is like Letterman’s apology to the Palins for his joke about their daughter.
It hard to see it as a sincere and heart felt statement when there is a laugh track in the background!
You should have read my first reaction to OKO response, I am now glad I re-read her response and corrected it to being one of addressing her real thoughts rather then her saying Fan just need a good piece of Azz to make her right.
Heckler posted June 12, 2009 at 11:37 am
Mighty mighty quiet.
——————-
It’s still warm. . .
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/2009/apr/global.html
#
writerdog
Posted June 12, 2009 at 11:59 am | Permalink
Anti your response was in jest but it also fit right into the mindset that Fan was talking about. And I and maybe other did not take it as you were joking considering the topic at hand. Sometime things can be joked about and made light of in a serious matter.
But then since it is a serious matter it should be given its due.
But it is like Letterman’s apology to the Palins for his joke about their daughter.
It hard to see it as a sincere and heart felt statement when there is a laugh track in the background!
You should have read my first reaction to OKO response, I am now glad I re-read her response and corrected it to being one of addressing her real thoughts rather then her saying Fan just need a good piece of Azz to make her right.
——————
Sanctimonious 101
More background on the Bush-appointed Walpin firing:
In August 2008, Walpin referred the matter to the local U.S. attorney’s office, which said the IG’s conclusions seemed overstated and did not accurately reflect all the information gathered in the investigation.
“We also highlighted numerous questions and further investigation they needed to conduct, including the fact that they had not done an audit to establish how much AmeriCorps money was actually misspent,” Acting U.S. Attorney Lawrence Brown said in an April 29 letter to the federal counsel of inspectors general.
Walpin’s office made repeated public comments just before the Sacramento mayoral election, prompting the U.S. attorney’s office to inform the media that it did not intend to file any criminal charges.
The U.S. attorney’s office reached a settlement in the matter. Brown cited press accounts that said Johnson and the nonprofit would repay half of nearly $850,000 in grants it received.
Kevin Hiestand, chairman of the board of St. HOPE Academy, said in a statement it was “about time” Walpin was removed. “Mr. Walpin’s allegations were meritless and clearly motivated by matters beyond an honest assessment of our program.”
And, “DavidB” –
It might be helpful to remember who was POTUS in August, 2008.
Certainly it couldn’t have been Shrub?!
As I recall (and from “Boxlock20’s” reference book George W. Bush was president from January 20, 1777 to January 20, 1781.
Boortz on Miranda rights for terrorists-
I disagree with the policy, whether Bush’s or Obama’s. If the world is so sure that these Islamic goons have Geneva rights, let’s give them those rights.
Under the Geneva Convention enemy combatants dressed in civilian clothes can be summarily executed. No Miranda rights necessary.
“You have the right to stand up against this wall. We have the right to put a slug in you. Stand by for your rights.”
http://boortz.com/nealz_nuze/index.html
Sanctimonious 101
And Regular would it be sanctimonious to take offense if someone said “Well that Regular is a broken has-been who we got his usefulness out of him so he should just remain quiet and wait in a dark room to die!”. If someone does not address that statement than are they agreeing with that statement? I certainly would address that statement too.
But then would that make me being sanctimonious!
To much is said that is damning of the speaker and the organization they are fellowship with.
If you do not say anything to the contrary then you are sharing their views. You could say well its not the true so it does not matter. It not how I or anyone within that fellowship believes so it does not make any difference.
DonDubbieTeleTubbie:
M/f-er – I’m in menopause. I no longer menstruate. Therefore, I no longer have PMS – if I ever did. After pregnancy, that s–t just sort of dissipated.
OKObserver: I need neither the medical attention you pillory nor an attitude adjustment. And just for the record, I’ve attracted my fair share of dudes – but there’s one problemo. And it’s a fairly substantial problem.
FilmFan’s got impeccable tastes. I suppose that’s one fallout (among several) of falling in love at age 16 with someone whose looks could have prevented The War Between The (Tes)tates.
Of course, he turned out to be The Eunuch for Satan, but I was too stupid to know it.
That’s what I was doing in my earlier posts today: Pokin’ big foo-yun at the morons from Topeka!
What is the legacy of rape? Cliches you’ve heard; truisms you haven’t heard;
And a whole lotta snooty-tooty-ness in the FilmFan.
I can’t help it if you’re not intelligent enough to deal with it.
Even a blind pig sometimes finds a filbert.
And actually, “Heckler,” you’re right when you post –
“Under the Geneva Convention enemy combatants dressed in civilian clothes can be summarily executed. No Miranda rights necessary.”
So why don’t we do it?
Could it be summarily executing Russians (if you’re a Nazi) or German (if you’re in the Red Army) during World War II were images abhorrent to all Americans?
And why do you think that was?
Because the Constitution of the United States declares we Americans don’t do stuff like that.
Then along comes Cheney/Shrub and decides Americans do commit atrocities for which previous generations executed war criminals who’d committed the same crimes against humanity.
(The Big) Dick Cheney would have been better off had he instructed American troops in Afghanistan to dig Nazi pits and never tried to dance around his policy, too cute by half, by giving the Oval Office carte blanche to lock up anyone and deny them due process forever.
Hey. How could Dick Cheney Nazi pits hurt his approval ratings?
#
writerdog
Posted June 12, 2009 at 12:19 pm | Permalink
Sanctimonious 101
And Regular would it be sanctimonious to take offense if someone said “Well that Regular is a broken has-been who we got his usefulness out of him so he should just remain quiet and wait in a dark room to die!”. If someone does not address that statement than are they agreeing with that statement? I certainly would address that statement too.
But then would that make me being sanctimonious!
To much is said that is damning of the speaker and the organization they are fellowship with.
If you do not say anything to the contrary then you are sharing their views. You could say well its not the true so it does not matter. It not how I or anyone within that fellowship believes so it does not make any difference.
——————————–
High Horse…
Dismount Please…
The logic that the Holocaust shooter is a standard issue Conservative Christian is right up there with the leftwing fantasies that Hitler was “rightwing” and that fascism is a rightwing phenomenon…I mean shoot, Stalin said Hitler was “rightwing”, so who could argue with that source (you know..”Uncle Joe” to FDR)? Oh, and my other favorite about how “Hitler was a Catholic, Christians were “his crew” and the Pope agreed with the Holocaust!” as a defense. Well, let’s see what your Bible the NYT’s had to finally admit about this myth…..
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/13/weekinreview/word-for-word-case-against-nazis-hitler-s-forces-planned-destroy-german.html?pagewanted=1
But you guys keep perpetuating the myths, because Christians are scary, yet dumb, but controlling the world, but leaving churches in droves, vote in massive blocs (as opposed to minorities, unions, the media and various other “identity politics” strains that ALWAYS vote Dem), are intolerant, as you being the “tolerant ones” bashes them literally daily….the strawman debate would be hilarious if it weren’t accepted cognitive dissonance.
IRS Considers Taxing Personal Use of Work Cell Phones as ‘Fringe Benefit’
WTF?!?!?!?!
Nah, HE isn’t going to raise taxes…
SolDevVB
Posted June 12, 2009 at 12:41 pm | Permalink
IRS Considers Taxing Personal Use of Work Cell Phones as ‘Fringe Benefit’
WTF?!?!?!?!
Nah, HE isn’t going to raise taxes
———————–
Added to the list of taxes that O’Bama promised not to raise on the average taxpayer.
Let’s see:
– Phone Tax – check
– Cap and trade Tax – check
– Carbon taxes – check
– Income cap from 250K to 235K – check
– Internet Tax – check
– Soft Drink Tax – check
– Health Care Tax reform – check
The list grows longer and longer…
Tax and spend is back boys, tax and spend…
Say it ain’t so:
Yesterday afternoon Glenn Beck and two of his guests argued that Adolph Hitler and the Nazi Party were “leftwing”; that “political correctness” led the committed white supremacist, James Von Brunn, to shoot a security guard at the Holocaust Museum in Washington, DC; and that ultimately President Barack Obama is the one responsible for the violence because his “bailouts” and “Socialistic” policies are engendering widespread anger.
The scholarship in this book demonstrates overwhelming scientific support for the position that the warming of the twentieth century was moderate and not unprecedented, that its impact on human health and wildlife was positive, and that carbon dioxide probably is not the driving factor behind climate change.
The authors cite thousands of peer-reviewed research papers and books that were ignored by the IPCC, plus additional scientific research that became available after the IPCC’s self-imposed deadline of May 2006.
http://www.nipccreport.org/
Regular
Posted June 12, 2009 at 12:49 pm | Permalink
Added to the list of taxes that O’Bama promised not to raise on the average taxpayer.
Let’s see:
- Phone Tax – check
- Cap and trade Tax – check
- Carbon taxes – check
- Income cap from 250K to 235K – check
- Internet Tax – check
- Soft Drink Tax – check
- Health Care Tax reform – check
The list grows longer and longer…
Tax and spend is back boys, tax and spend…
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
This is just a minor point, I’m sure, but how many of the taxes you’ve listed have actually been instituted?
With the exception of Nazi’s being Left-wing, that’s wrong.
DavidB – why don’t you shed some light on why Hitler & the Nazi’s (Mussolini too if you feel like it) are “rightwing”. The rest is garbage propaganda. The only comparison they made was about the shooter’s comments about Jews vs Rev Wright’s comments about “Them Jews won’t let him talk to me….” no Obama tie-in at all there, except that Wright was Obama’s preacher for 20 yrs, married him, baptized kids, etc. But would love to hear your logic as to why Fascism is a rightwing ideology…and no, “because the NYT told me so” doesn’t count.
This is just a minor point, I’m sure, but how many of the taxes you’ve listed have actually been instituted?
They are all proposed and supported/sponsored by O’Bama.
But you know, the campaign promises…
…mean nothing right?
Global warming alarmism is lethal.
Looks like public hospitals in British Columbia, Canada, will have to cut patient services in order to comply with global warming laws established by the provincial government. The Surrey Leader reports:
The Lower Mainland’s health authorities will have to dig more than $4 million a year out of their already stretched budgets to pay B.C.’s carbon tax and offset their carbon footprints. Critics say the payments mean the government’s strategy to fight climate change will further exacerbate a crisis in health funding.
Writer contributes:
“Then OKO said as much that if she wants a real man, Fan should accept being slapped around and being a life support system for a female body part. Bare foot and naked at the stove. That is what Fan was talking about, that is what the Phelps was saying!”
————
Only the left seems to know what they are talking about. Sorry you and filmfan seem to be on the same channel.
BTW I have never had a problem with expressing an opinion so I don’t think you need to be interpreting my post – but thanks for the attempt to help.
Writer I’m not sure what happened to your thought process but the result surely isn’t what you were aiming for.
BTW have you looked into the sword and the Naval Acadamey thing you posted about earlier?
That SWORD thing was implemented following 9/11 — in 2001
SUV vs. Plane
Five people miraculously survive after plane slams into ute near Johannesburg
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25624854-401,00.html
DFB,
Your posts on this subject illustrate the problems inherent in trying to categorize individuals and political ideologies/philosophies in this way:
Left Right
Most people fit that model in economic terms but when you try to factor in authoritarianism v. classic liberalism, it gets all messed up.
Check this out:
http://www.politicalcompass.org/test
This is a test/survey of about 50 questions incorporating your views on nationalism/patriotism, economic posture, social issues, religion, and sexual mores.
I linked to the page that starts the test. You might want to read the background info before you take the test, but that’s up to you.
soldevvb posted June 12, 2009 at 12:59 pm
The scholarship in this book demonstrates overwhelming scientific support. . .
——————
From Singer, Idso, and the Heartland Institute? ROFL!
#
cosmos_originally
Posted June 12, 2009 at 1:24 pm | Permalink
soldevvb posted June 12, 2009 at 12:59 pm
The scholarship in this book demonstrates overwhelming scientific support. . .
——————
From Singer, Idso, and the Heartland Institute? ROFL!
————————————-
Al Gore, the C&D student in college science?
ROFL!
Daniel – couldn’t agree more! That’s kinda my point with pressing the issue to see what the justification is for classification. “Classic Liberal” vs “Modern Liberal” is perfect example…and most people don’t know the difference, so are easily fooled, based on grammatically correct wording, but historically incorrect meanings. Republicans & Dems and have flip-flopped meanings and historical norms are applied to current labels. It’s all the same silliness as all pro-lifers are “Christian Taliban”, etc, etc. Identity politics is stupid and shallow.
Tobacco users takes it in the face again. Our nanny government will have control. Grow your own, I guess. Additional regulations means more loss of freedom and in the name of the common good, what’s next. A lot I think.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090612/ap_on_bi_ge/us_fda_tobacco
sol: That item was in 2006 in something called Kung FU as well, but it seems the hospitals had no trouble complying with whatever they had to. The Frasier Insititue was behind the report, a right wing group of kooks who amongst other things also declared as late as 2004, that investigations which led to connecting smoking with health hazards was junk science.
Even a blind pig sometimes finds a filbert.
And actually, “Heckler,” you’re right when you post –
“Under the Geneva Convention enemy combatants dressed in civilian clothes can be summarily executed. No Miranda rights necessary.”
So why don’t we do it?
Happened all the time during ww2
June 12 (Bloomberg) — Health-care overhaul legislation being drafted by House Democrats will include $600 billion in tax increases and $400 billion in cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel said.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aqLNecbH0dcg
Chas
Posted June 12, 2009 at 1:17 pm | Permalink
That SWORD thing was implemented following 9/11 — in 2001
————–
Chas where exactly can I find this information?
From the Link:
Asked whether the cost of a health-care overhaul would be more than $1 trillion, Rangel said, “the answer is yes.”
#
okobserver
Posted June 12, 2009 at 2:46 pm | Permalink
Chas
Posted June 12, 2009 at 1:17 pm | Permalink
That SWORD thing was implemented following 9/11 — in 2001
————–
Chas where exactly can I find this information?
————————-
The Midshipmen were disarmed of umbrellas as well.
go figure…
Such inclusive language from the “big mind” party. Good thing it’s only the “rightwingers” that spread hate & discontent….huh…the article’s titled, “The Big Hate”, I feel warm and cuddly all over (funny thing is, in his Beck reference, I saw the show he talks about…Beck was dogging the FEMA camp story and brought on people specifically to dispel it…but I’m sure Krugman’s a loyal Fox viewer and would never just lay out accusations with no basis….afterall he’s got a Nobel “Peace” Prize…)
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/12/opinion/12krugman.html?_r=1
#
Chas
Posted June 12, 2009 at 1:17 pm | Permalink
That SWORD thing was implemented following 9/11 — in 2001
_____________________________________
That is a lie, Chas. That makes you a liar.
Here’s a photo of Naval Academy graduates in 2006, wearing swords, one in middle, some on the left.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/05/28/us/28bush.600.jpg
June 12 (Bloomberg) — Health-care overhaul legislation being drafted by House Democrats will include $600 billion in tax increases
***************************************
But only for the richest 5% of Americans. Nobody making less than 250,000 will have to pay more taxes. Yeah, right.
Hope and change you can believe in.
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
#
HLP
Posted June 12, 2009 at 3:16 pm | Permalink
#
Chas
Posted June 12, 2009 at 1:17 pm | Permalink
That SWORD thing was implemented following 9/11 — in 2001
_____________________________________
That is a lie, Chas. That makes you a liar.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
I can’t vouch for the veracity of this link…the source site is a bit
suspecttoo right-wingy for me.http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/05/22/usna-ceremonial-swords-on-the-prohibited-list-since-after-911/
Sounds like a bunch of sword fightin’ to me…
#
ANTI
Posted June 12, 2009 at 3:49 pm | Permalink
Sounds like a bunch of sword fightin’ to me…
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
I don’t know when the policy originated but it seems kind of crazy to me.
Although, Sadat was taken out by some of his own troops and I’m sure there are other examples throughout history I’m unaware of.
David Letterman should apologize for saying that Sarah Palin looked like a slu++y flight attendant.
Not!
Though, she looks more like a slu++y librarian to me.
Go DAVE!
ROFL!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Singer
ROFL!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_D._Idso
ROFL!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Heartland_Institute
ROFL!
Al “Porky” Gore
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_9VGZjBQHr0s/Se2CFWtS-qI/AAAAAAAADJ0/CdoNr9F2QKI/s400/fat+al+gore-pray.jpg
ROFL!
The Goralce
http://www.freakingnews.com/Al-Gore-Oracle-Pictures-39642.asp
HLP
Posted June 12, 2009 at 3:16 pm | Permalink
#
Chas
Posted June 12, 2009 at 1:17 pm | Permalink
That SWORD thing was implemented following 9/11 — in 2001
_____________________________________
That is a lie, Chas. That makes you a liar.
=================================================
Too bad Hank… It has already been linked TWICE today that the Sword thing was initiated AFTER 9/11… So sorry, you lose… LIAR!!! Not my fault you cant read!!
“That SWORD thing was implemented following 9/11 — in 2001”
Chas, I am having trouble determining if the 2001 above is telling me when 9/11 happened; if so would that not be 9/11/2001?
If you are saying the swords were omitted in 2001; graduation was in June and believe it or not 9/11 happened in September.
“So sorry, you lose… LIAR!!! Not my fault you cant read!!”
Sorry, swords were not outlawed in 2001. Chas, you are wrong. Reading problem?
“If you saw this story about how midshipmen’s ceremonial swords were on the prohibited list for graduation ceremonies, you were probably not pleased about it. Neither was I – but I checked with the Public Affairs office for the Naval Academy, and they informed me that this policy was put into place in response to 9/11. It is, bluntly, a stupid policy – if our midshipmen cannot be trusted to not assassinate the President, we’re in much worse trouble than we thought – but it’s also not the administration’s fault.
I encourage President Obama to change this policy and give his officers their swords back. We are citizens of a Republic, after all – they are not subjects, and he is not a king.
Crossposted to Moe Lane.”
http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/05/22/usna-ceremonial-swords-on-the-prohibited-list-since-after-911/
And it had NOTHING to do with Obama!!
HUD I guess you cant read either!!! So sorry for your reading disability!!
Heh.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5PS6bNiD5U
cosmos_originally
Posted June 12, 2009 at 12:00 pm | Permalink
Heckler posted June 12, 2009 at 11:37 am
Mighty mighty quiet.
——————-
It’s still warm. . .
__________________________
For April, but not so much for May.
HUD — What part of the word “following” do you not comprehend???
“implemented following 9/11 — in 2001″
Evidently can’t believe his lying eyes when I posted the 2006 photo of Naval Academy graduation, show marines/naval officers wearing – swords.
It’s from a New York Times archive photo collection.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/05/28/us/28bush.600.jpg
HA!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqeggF5CfeQ
“…Public Affairs office for the Naval Academy… informed me that this policy was put into place in response to 9/11.” [see link above]
Reg — Maybe the Times did some photo-shopping… Take it up with the author of the ARTICLE listed above… And the one listed/posted much earlier today as well…
FYI, I think its a pretty stupid policy myself… Lots of things that happened FOLLOWING 9/11 were pretty stupid…
Sean Hannity is calling for David Letterman to apologize.
Sure Sean. Right after you apologize for airing the “McCain supporter mutilated by Obama supporter!” hoax. Been bout 8 months since ya ran with that one and never apologized.
And we’re STILL waiting for Sean to show us through personal experience that water boarding is not torture. He promised to do that for charity.
Call Sean Hannity and remind him at 1 800 941 4326
Regular posted June 12, 2009 at 4:24 pm
ROFL!
The Goralce
——————
Poor Regular can’t refute the AGW science done by the top scientists worldwide, so he has to resort to weak personal attacks on Al Gore.
Chas
Posted June 12, 2009 at 4:44 pm | Permalink
“…Public Affairs office for the Naval Academy… informed me that this policy was put into place in response to 9/11.” [see link above]
Reg — Maybe the Times did some photo-shopping… Take it up with the author of the ARTICLE listed above… And the one listed/posted much earlier today as well…
FYI, I think its a pretty stupid policy myself… Lots of things that happened FOLLOWING 9/11 were pretty stupid
=========================
No, one person on one particular blog says there was a ‘no swords’ policy.
So what happened in 2006, when Bush was President and swords were worn?
Can’t believe your lying eyes?
David Letterman should apologize for saying that Sarah Palin looked like a slu++y flight attendant.
Not!
Though, she looks more like a slu++y librarian to me.”
She sure looks a lot better, and a lot cleaner, than that prostitute Pelosi !
REG — Read slowly… This was posted TWICE today… I didnt post it.. just reacting to it… You want to call somebody a LIAR, go upthread, and find who ORIGINALLY posted it…
I dont waste time with Redstates.com…
President Bush at WestPoint and they are (gasp!) wearing swords! (2006)
http://barbadosfreepress.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/west-point-sword-bush.jpg
I dont agree with the slu**y part… but she does look more like a librarian than a flight attendant… LOL
A very good personal blog about the swords and the various academies.
http://barbadosfreepress.wordpress.com/
Regular
Posted June 12, 2009 at 4:39 pm | Permalink
It’s from a New York Times archive photo collection.
=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
You should know better than to trust anything in that liberal rag.
Chas
Posted June 12, 2009 at 4:51 pm | Permalink
REG — Read slowly… This was posted TWICE today… I didnt post it.. just reacting to it… You want to call somebody a LIAR, go upthread, and find who ORIGINALLY posted it…
———————————
Chas
Posted June 12, 2009 at 1:17 pm | Permalink
That SWORD thing was implemented following 9/11 — in 2001
———————————
Chas was ‘fer’ his facts until he was ‘agin’ his facts.
Regular
Posted June 12, 2009 at 4:51 pm | Permalink
President Bush at WestPoint and they are (gasp!) wearing swords! (2006)
http://barbadosfreepress.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/west-point-sword-bush.jpg
================================================
Ummmm — West Point isnt the Naval Academy either… Good Grief!!! D.D.D.
Poor cosmos can’t refute the science done by 150 peer reviewed scientists worldwide(referenced in Singer’s Book), so he has to resort to weak personal attacks on Dr Singer.
Hud
Posted June 12, 2009 at 4:28 pm | Permalink
If you are saying the swords were omitted in 2001; graduation was in June and believe it or not 9/11 happened in September.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Is it possible that the policy was changed in the Fall of 2001 even though the next graduation wasn’t until the following Spring?
Of course it is.
“I dont agree with the slu**y part… but she does look more like a librarian than a flight attendant… LOL”–Chas
Hum….agreed.
#
Daniel
Posted June 12, 2009 at 5:00 pm | Permalink
Hud
Posted June 12, 2009 at 4:28 pm | Permalink
If you are saying the swords were omitted in 2001; graduation was in June and believe it or not 9/11 happened in September.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Is it possible that the policy was changed in the Fall of 2001 even though the next graduation wasn’t until the following Spring?
Of course it is.
—————————–
The real answer is that swords are optional. Midshipmen normally don’t carry swords and they have to buy their own.
Marine dress uniforms, often include the wear of a sword. If you find any photos of the 2009 graduation of future Marines, you might find your swords.
TRY THIS ONE
http://www.sofmag.com/wp/2009/06/the-straight-scoop-on-the-naval-academy-graduation/
From the above link… Please note the closing comments CLOSELY >>>>
“Many parents give swords to graduates to be worn with their officer uniform after commissioning, but they along with many other items are routinely banned from being carried into the graduation ceremony for obvious security reasons.”
Is there none amongst the RWE who’ll avenge the Palin family honor? Watch out Letterman.
Dissing Pelosi:
What kind of a man calls a 69-year-old mother of five, grandmother of seven and a life-long public servant a foul name like that? Have you no shame?
Easy to settle, just give them plastic swords.
Wichita Ice Center Hosts Lose the Training Wheels
Date: June 12, 2009
Contact: Deb Umberger, Public Relations & Outreach Coordinator
Children and adults with disabilities will have the opportunity to learn to ride a conventional bicycle during a week-long camp June 22-26 at the Wichita Ice Center.
Participants in the “Lose the Training Wheels” program use specially adapted bicycles made available during five 75-minute sessions.
“Lose the Training Wheels” is a national nonprofit organization whose executive director, Matt Hampton, is a local resident. Independent Living Resource Center (ILRC) is the local sponsor for the Wichita camp. About 100 volunteers will help with the camp. On average, 85 percent of participants learn to ride independently by the end of the camp.
Independent Living Resource Center is a not-for-profit agency that provides resources and services to more than 4,000 people with disabilities in south-central Kansas each year. Services include information and referral, vocational training, independent living skills training, peer support, medical equipment loans, computer training, social and recreational activities, and community education. ILRC is celebrating its 25th year in 2009.
Daily session times for the five-day camp are:
* Session 1
8:30 a.m. – 9:45 a.m.
* Session 2
10 a.m. – 11:15 a.m.
* Session 3
11:30 a.m. – 12:45 p.m.
* Session 4
1:45 p.m. – 3 p.m.
* Session 5
3:15 p.m. – 4:30 p.m.
On June 26, campers, families and volunteers will join in a 6PM celebration cookout, followed by presentation of certificates of achievement.
And chas in what official capacity does this blog writer operate. I asked you to give me the ruling on this after 9/11. So far you have been unable to do this. I have seen pictures of all of the cadets from West Point, Annapolis and the Air Force Academy with swords on and presidents in attendance. So if it is official as you said, where is the official document that would prove this.
Seems we have a lot of law breaking goin’ on.
I think this article would look good over here too.
Obama’s issues crumbling
By Dick Morris
“According to a Rasmussen poll, more voters now trust Republicans more than Democrats to handle the economy, by a margin of 45-39. Scott Rasmussen notes that “this is the first time in over two years of polling that the GOP has held the advantage on this issue.” Last month, he had the Democrats holding a one-point lead, but they lost it in June’s polling.
And the Democratic leads over Republicans on their core issues are also dropping. Particularly interesting is the Democratic decline over healthcare, from an 18-point lead in May to only 10 points now.
A Gallup poll also confirms that the president’s personal ratings are high, but the underlying data less so. While 67 percent of voters give Obama personal favorable ratings and 61 percent approve of his job performance (Rasmussen has his job approval lower, at 55 percent), they give him much lower ratings on specific issues.
Gallup shows Obama getting only 55 percent approval on his handling of the economy (down from 59 percent in February) and finds that only 45 percent approve of his handling of federal spending while 46 percent approve of his treatment of the budget deficit.
As it becomes clearer that the deficit caused by spending has landed us in a new economic crisis, entirely of Obama’s own making, his popularity and job performance are likely to drop as well.
The old recession — that the public says was caused by Bush — shows signs of winding down. But the new recession and/or inflation — triggered by Obama’s massive deficits — is just now coming upon us.
If Obama refuses to cut back on his spending/stimulus plans (despite convincing evidence that Americans are not spending the money), he has three options:
a) He can raise taxes, which will trigger a deeper recession;
b) He can print money, which will trigger huge inflation;
c) He can pay more interest to borrow money, which will send the economy diving down again.
The blame for these outcomes will fall squarely on Obama’s deficit and spending policies. The fact that Americans are aware of these issues, and already disapprove of Obama’s performance on them, indicates that they will be increasingly receptive to blaming him for the “new” recession.”
This ought to be fun to watch…of course it was predicted by many all along.
Since it seems that there is much dis-information about this matter, the heart of the matter is what was posted earlier today by Heckler, where Heckler made the FALSE insinuation that Obama had something to do with whether or not Navy Midshipmen were banned from wearing swords by Obama Secret Service… Now that this is cleared up, it would seem that the “blame” if we really want to call it that would be on Heckler… I would settle for the FACT that the information Heckler relied on was FALSE… for the purpose of flaming – yet again – Obama, for something not even done by Obama…
“Dissing Pelosi:
What kind of a man calls a 69-year-old mother of five, grandmother of seven and a life-long public servant a foul name like that? Have you no shame?”—DavidB
Ah….No! Not over that, it’s true.
And I forgot to stick the word ‘lying’ in front of it as well.
I know it’s not respectful, but sometimes you just have to call them the way they are.
Here ya go Okie… from the NAVAL ACADEMY PRESS OFFICE….
Seems like your claim of seeing Naval graduates wearing swords is PHONY…. Why am I not surprised???
http://www.sofmag.com/wp/2009/06/the-straight-scoop-on-the-naval-academy-graduation/
Chas
Posted June 12, 2009 at 5:11 pm | Permalink
From the above link… Please note the closing comments CLOSELY >>>>
“Many parents give swords to graduates to be worn with their officer uniform after commissioning, but they along with many other items are routinely banned from being carried into the graduation ceremony for obvious security reasons.”/i>
Boxlock, you still think Jefferson served as the THIRD President, from Jan. 20, 1777 – January 20, 1781??? LOL
DavidB — Boxlock has never had any shame or decency before… Why would he/she start now?? LOL
Maybe the Navy knows it’s Midshipmen pretty well. Maybe a few would yield to the temptation of giving ‘The One’ a Wacky Wack or two, or fifty.
Why’s it such a big deal?
a) He can raise taxes, which will trigger a deeper recession;
b) He can print money, which will trigger huge inflation;
c) He can pay more interest to borrow money, which will send the economy diving down again.
================================================
CORRECTION —
Obama cant do ANY of these three things without Congressional approval…. Senators and Representatives need to be re-elected… Figure it out…. And it doesnt even take math!!
He served as third president from (1801–1809).
But being such a petty little man and a faux preacher I can understand why you look so desperately for tiny mistakes in others to make yourself look relevant.
Chas it’s not working, you still look like a petty little man and even more so as that was not my comment but a copy and paste in a long piece whose subject that mistake made no difference.
But do what you must to live with yourself.
chasss you posted a blog from the Soldier of Fortune magazine. Nothing official. I have never said Obama was responsible. You however said there was a policy made ‘after 9/11 in 2001. I merely asked you to back that up since you made the statement. Still waiting.
BTW up thread I have posted pictures showing sword wearing cadets with Bush and Cheney after 2001.
————
Boxlock I have said for a while that the winds are changing. People are starting to emerge from the stupor they were in for the election, looking around and saying ‘what have we done’. The O’bama camp would do well to listen to the rumbling. The 2010 elections are coming ever nearer.
“Obama cant do ANY of these three things without Congressional approval…. “—Chas
And he has a majority in Congress that are almost as stupid and partisan as you.
“There was a time when decency, even honor, was an essential part of the American dialogue in its most ideal form, and part of its very identity. There was a time when our culture would have recoiled in horror at the vituperation flowing unchecked from radios, televisions, and the Internet, instead of applauding it as “common sense,” “free speech,” or “mavericky,” or “a spin-free zone.”
There was a time when intellectual honesty was not considered unpatriotic; when compassion for, and understanding of, your fellow man was a sign of strength, not weakness. There was a time when the phrase Have you no shame? meant something, and the First Amendment was not used as toilet paper to wipe up the excremental verbal degradation of vulnerable segments of the American population. A time when it was expected that citizens would understand the difference between free speech and irresponsible speech. Somewhere along the line, a cancerous segment of American popular culture and media cunningly exploited the long-standing, honorable American “cowboy” motif and mentality. They grafted cruelty, divisiveness, and ignorance to it, making the two appear indistinguishable, and natural allies. And they are neither, or at least ought not to be.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-rowe/the-holocaust-museum-shoo_b_214133.html
“The 2010 elections are coming ever nearer.”
Can’t wait.
And the the 2012, ha ha!
I\’ve had thisme, I have noboys. My mother diedher. My dad hasthe book herion and sexfemale relatives innever thought thatwish. Five months
[url=http://www.smnnews.com/board/showthread.php?t=207005]college gay guy having hot sex[/url]haired with a prettydaughters. Grace islives with her
Regular,
You’re very confused. The attacks on Singer made by other scientists are not “personal” — they’re about Singer’s inaccuracies, and his lack of scientific credibility.
DavidB,
You must be referring to David Letterman’s filthy comments about Sarah Palin’s 14 yr. old daughter.
cosmos,
You’re very confused. The attacks on Gore made by scientists are not “personal” — they’re about Gore’s inaccuracies, and his lack of scientific credibility and credentials.
Sarah had Bristol locked up at home with Trig on that trip, so she said it must’ve been they younger daughter.
Sarah’s going to wring every ounce of spotlight out of this she can.
Chas:
““Obama cant do ANY of these three things without Congressional approval…. “
Amazing how quickly people ‘forget’ their blaming GW for personally raising the debt in this country, when the Democratically controlled Congress had to approve that as well.
Short memory there, Chas??
http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/vicepresident/photoessays/naval-academy/index.html
Here’s the link of Cheney speaking at Annapolis in 2006.
Guess what?
Nobody is wearing swords.
#
Boxlock20
Posted June 12, 2009 at 5:25 pm | Permalink
Maybe the Navy knows it’s Midshipmen pretty well. Maybe a few would yield to the temptation of giving ‘The One’ a Wacky Wack or two, or fifty.
Why’s it such a big deal?
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-===-=-=-=-=-=-=
You seem to be enamored with the idea of people murdering others with whom they disagree. First Roeder and now you fantasize about some Midshipman taking out Obama.
Do you really hold the Midshipmen in such low regard?
#
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 5:45 pm | Permalink
Here’s the link of Cheney speaking at Annapolis in 2006.
Guess what?
Nobody is wearing swords.
===============================================
Here’s a photo of the Naval Academy graduation in 2006 and guess what? They are wearing swords!
(source: New York Times Photo Archives)
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/05/28/us/28bush.600.jpg
“Sean Hannity has devoted a total of one sentence over two editions of his Fox News show to the topic of the June 10 shooting of a security guard at the Holocaust Memorial Museum.”
“After having criticized other media for inadequately covering the June 1 shooting at an Army recruiting center in Arkansas, which resulted in the death of Pvt. William Long….”
HA!
They need the swords to swashbuckle with the Pirates!
Although, they look like West Point Cadets, the NY Times could be wrong…
The Times isn’t wrong, Regular.
YOU ARE.
It’s Bush at West Point, not Cheney at Annapolis.
Sheesh.
Well cap my question all along was if swords were banished at one place why not all places. If some were allowed to wear swords in 2006 then why not all?
That was my question and chas acted like he knew where the edict could be found.
Guess he didn’t know anything afterall.
It’s Bush at West Point, not Cheney at Annapolis.
Sheesh.
————-
Cap that is interesting that Bush allowed swords in place around him. This might get better.
OKO–
I checked your link.
It’s bogus. It shows Cheney in one photograph with grads.. And Navy dudes with swords in another photograph.
There’s no way to determine if the two photos were taken at the same event.
#
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 5:54 pm | Permalink
The Times isn’t wrong, Regular.
YOU ARE.
It’s Bush at West Point, not Cheney at Annapolis.
Sheesh.
========================
I’m not the one who labeled it wrong. :)
Besides, evidently there was no sword ban anywhere, except where prohibited by law – like abortion clinics.
(chortles)
Dear President Obama.
Please soak that old witch okobserver but good,
“You must be referring to David Letterman’s filthy comments about Sarah Palin’s 14 yr. old daughter.”
They got laughs AND applause.
Twice.
David Letterman is an entertainer. It is his JOB to please his audience. People LIKE to see Sarah Palin and her hillbilly family trashed.
#
BlueJay
Posted June 12, 2009 at 6:07 pm | Permalink
“You must be referring to David Letterman’s filthy comments about Sarah Palin’s 14 yr. old daughter.”
They got laughs AND applause.
Twice.
==============================
Then jokes about O’Bama’s daughters having sex with a New York Yankee’s baseball player should get laughs and applause as well.
DavidB – does anyone really care what Hannity does, says, shows? He’s the Conservative Olbermann…nobody cares.
“Then jokes about O’Bama’s daughters having sex with a New York Yankee’s baseball player should get laughs and applause as well.”
Among cons, and ….those sorts of people, I am sure that they would. But humor is a strange con cept for the cons.
They think things like evictions and hungry children are funny.
#
BlueJay
Posted June 12, 2009 at 6:15 pm | Permalink
“Then jokes about O’Bama’s daughters having sex with a New York Yankee’s baseball player should get laughs and applause as well.”
Among cons, and ….those sorts of people, I am sure that they would. But humor is a strange con cept for the cons.
They think things like evictions and hungry children are funny.
========================================
Yeah?
Where would that be or did you just make another lie up?
Here’s what the 2008 Rules said:
Stadium Prohibited Items (items ok to bring on the Yard have an asterisk)
The following items are PROHIBITED from entering through the gates. Individuals shall be allowed entrance ONLY after disposing or securing prohibited items.
Furthermore, screeners we will NOT “hold” items; the owner must dispose of or secure
the item(s) in their vehicle, etc.
Weapons/knives of any type, to include ceremonial swords
Umbrellas*
Bags larger than a typical purse (i.e., duffle bags, back packs, large camera bags, etc.)
Mace
Outside food or drink*
Anything that may be considered a weapon or a threat by screeners
http://www.wisnapa.org/images/Web%20site%20info/2008%20CW%20Schedule.pdf
******
If it sounds stupid, and a right-winger said it, it’s probably stupid.
Well, Obama’s daughters didn’t get themselves knocked up, now did they . . .
By the way, since Chas and I (thanks also to WriterD) have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that the NO SWORDS rule started before Obama became President . . .
We will now gladly accept the apologies of the right-wingers.
The mother/daughter pregnancy kit. Available at Wasilla bait and tackle.
#
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 6:25 pm | Permalink
By the way, since Chas and I (thanks also to WriterD) have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that the NO SWORDS rule started before Obama became President . . .
We will now gladly accept the apologies of the right-wingers.
———————-
No you didn’t.
Midshipman normally don’t wear swords at graduation. Refer to Chas’s previous post about them getting them as gifts upon graduation.
So, you can re-address you lie as time permits.
Well, Obama’s daughters didn’t get themselves knocked up, now did they
==================================
They still have time to be someone’s baby’s momma.
Regular–
1. You’re either acting like an idiot (trolling) just to make people mad
OR
2. You really are an idiot.
I can go either way on it.
Dude, you can’t claim that Obama is “scared of Navy grads with swords” when the regulations called for the same damn prohibition the year BEFORE he became President.
In fact, it apparently has been in force since 2001.
Heckler
Posted June 12, 2009 at 6:43 am | Permalink
No Naval Swords for U.S.N.A. Graduation this year – Threat to the Dear Leader Inside the Beltway – Washington Times
*****
Heckler is absolutely right. He simply neglected as did the right-wing hate sites to find out that NOTHING HAS CHANGED FROM LAST YEAR.
Mein Gott, how can America make progress with people who think like this?
okobserver
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:54 am | Permalink
Writer wants evidence. It’s all over the internet for the curious.
Thanks for the post.
*****
Nevermind that the internet that Oko cites is just an echo chamber of the reich-wing rag, The Washington Times.
I’ll take your apology too, Oko.
I would choose a rifle over a sword as a weapon..I’m just sayin’.
#
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 6:44 pm | Permalink
Regular–
1. You’re either acting like an idiot (trolling) just to make people mad
OR
2. You really are an idiot.
I can go either way on it.
Dude, you can’t claim that Obama is “scared of Navy grads with swords” when the regulations called for the same damn prohibition the year BEFORE he became President.
In fact, it apparently has been in force since 2001.
=================================================
U.S. Naval Academy Official Photo
http://www.usna.edu/PAO/Photos/Around%20the%20Yard/USNA%20Stock%20Photos%2012505%20037.jpg
It’s only when O’Bama is in town that they can’t wear the sword.
Ah, Regular proves it’s number two, not number one.
Of course, Marines and some Navy officers wear swords.
They just don’t do it at graduation according to the rules that the Bush people laid down.
Maybe that’ll be part of the CHANGE Obama talked about during the campaign.
Capn not sure what you are wanting an apology for. I said chasss said the rule came into effect because of ‘9/11 in 2001′. You came in the middle of the conversation and took up his mantle.
Not sure what you proved or when it was made effective. Just let me know what I owe you an apology for and I will think about it.
As for the writer comment. I have searched extensively for the evidence you claim to know all about. You have given us a stadium policy. If this rule were made as chasss said ‘after 9/11 in 2001′ it would be for all military graduations and this is in fact not the truth.
And in case you didn’t notice the date on your link is 2008.
After carefully reading upthread, Heckler already admitted his mistake to WriterD.
Thank you, there is hope for some . . .
#
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 6:57 pm | Permalink
Ah, Regular proves it’s number two, not number one.
Of course, Marines and some Navy officers wear swords.
They just don’t do it at graduation according to the rules that the Bush people laid down.
Maybe that’ll be part of the CHANGE Obama talked about during the campaign.
——————————
I read that the swords were being melted down to make special voting machines for Democratic Party districts. One choice machines-vote Democrat or don’t vote at all.
(chortles)
One has to ask themselves of the apocryphal story of the ‘no swords’ at the Naval Academy in 2001.
All one has to do is to look at West Point photographs where swords are indeed worn at graduation ceremonies. In 2006, Bush attended such a ceremony – swords and all.
The story about the 2001 sword ban is obviously patently false.
The only ban of swords was by people attending the Naval Academy graduation as guests – i.e. they were not allowed to bring ceremonial swords into the stadium.
There is no record of Naval Academy graduates being prohibited of wearing swords during graduation by President Bush.
OKO–
This issue is this, and I’m typing real slow for you:
The Washington Times claimed that Obama is so scared of his own troops that he had swords banned at his graduation speech at the Naval Academy.
You supported this contention and chimed in that your bogus “barbados” blogsite had photos of sailors wearing swords during Cheney’s speech in 2006.
It does have photos of sailors wearing swords, but there’s no way to tell if they are at Cheney’s event or not.
Since the policy of prohibiting swords was in effect at least since 2008, obviously one can’t make the conclusion that Obama is responsible for the policy as you and Heckler did.
Repeat after me: “I was wrong to blame Obama for something that Bush did.”
For all you libs and dems here, I will leave to you to pay the extra billions in health care. Our Socalist Congress will not leave us alone.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aqLNecbH0dcg
Repeat after me: “I was wrong to blame Obama for something that Bush did.”
There is no proof President Bush made such an order.
“You seem to be enamored with the idea of people murdering others with whom they disagree. First Roeder and now you fantasize about some Midshipman taking out Obama.
Do you really hold the Midshipmen in such low regard?”—Daniel
Oh Gawd…NO, I would never “hold the Midshipmen in such low regard”…..but I sure as hell would ‘The One’ !!!
Regular–
The Washington Times fueled all this slander by reprinting the same regulations that have been in effect since 2002 (not 2001).
I linked to the 2008 regulations above.
Whether they apply to military personnel is not the issue. The Washington TIMES implied that the regs did apply without bothering to check and without looking at the history of the regulations of the Naval graduation.
In short, they slimed our President without reason.
Can someone give a legitimate, official source about this sword business?
I find it hard to believe the Secret Service would h a problem taking out a suddenly homicidal graduate….
All I have seen is blogs referencing blogs referencing blogs.. (google “obama sword graduate navy” and you get 44,000 results)
The fullest explaination I find is:
http://www.myssnews.com/forum.html?func=view&catid=3&id=5917&limit=15&start=15
“Re:Swordless Sailors 1 Day, 4 Hours ago Karma: 2
I have been looking at his quite a few hours this morning. Looks like that quote was taken from a blog of someone not liking Obama’s stand on gun control.
From what I could find, very little exposure, USNA graduates are given the ceremonial sword upon graduation.
I found the following on a naval forum:
There is unfortunately a considerable amount of misunderstanding and in some cases a lack of context regarding prescribed uniforms, ceremonial swords and associated security measures in conjunction with the recent May 22nd U.S. Naval Academy graduation and commissioning.
Midshipmen and officers did not wear ceremonial swords at graduation because of long established uniform protocol, not due to security concerns as some observers have inferred. In fact, the prescribed uniform for officers and Naval Academy midshipmen participating in the graduation and commissioning was “Navy Service Dress White” – i.e. the familiar Navy “choker” white uniform with ribbons; medals and swords were not prescribed with this uniform for this event. Other military service personnel who were participating wore their equivalent service uniform in the same configuration. Navy Service Dress White (and Marine Corps equivalent) has been the prescribed uniform for Naval Academy graduations in recent history, spanning the past several decades. Graduating midshipmen did not wear swords because swords were not a component of the service uniform prescribed for either this graduation or many other previous graduations.
…
The May 22nd graduation was attended by nearly 30,000 people, all of which had to undergo required security screening. As a matter of routine measures associated with similar events, attendees were required to be screened through magnetometers, and were prohibited from bringing large bags, large electronic items, and any instruments or tools that could be considered weapons or appear to be weapons. The Naval Academy advised the graduates and their families about the strict security associated with the graduation and recommended that families not bring certain items, including ceremonial swords. The intent was to avoid any additional stadium entry delays and to preclude family members from possibly not being able to attend their midshipman’s graduation. This was consistent with many previous graduation ceremonies.
I hope that this helps explain any misunderstandings on these issues.”
Repeat after me: “I was wrong to blame Obama for something that Bush did.”
There is no proof President Bush made such an order.
*****
Then of course there is no proof that Obama did either.
So it’s even a bigger stretch . . .
Hey all you good people,
My hair turned white at 11:30 this morning as I became a great-grandfather. Her name is Abigail, and I’m now officially an old fart!
Okay, thanks, David.
That clears it up. The “no swords” thing was directed not at the military grads but at GUESTS who might want to give their kid a sword.
Wow. The Washington Times owes the President one big mfing apology.
Unless of course they did it on purpose and now the damage has been done . . .
Congrats Jed.
Bush was never, and I repeat NEVER, afraid of his own troops, irregardless of where they were he mingled with them closely.
Obama….may have reason for concern.
Congrats Jed, they are a blessing.
But oh my gosh, I’m glad I’m not a ‘great grandfather’….that is old!!!
I am just a grandfather, and we were blessed with our fourth, and the first of one of our children, just this week.
#
Jed
Posted June 12, 2009 at 7:24 pm | Permalink
Hey all you good people,
My hair turned white at 11:30 this morning as I became a great-grandfather. Her name is Abigail, and I’m now officially an old fart!
==================================
Congratulations Jed!
You do realize that you can get a pass on about anything now as Great Grandparents are incapable of making errors. :)
Oh, and Jed, no matter what side of the ‘issues’ we are on, and how heated our arguments sometimes become, we all want the very best for our children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren….I am convinced of that.
At least we have something in common to hang on to.
Thanks Blue,
So far all I’ve seen is a pink blanket with a button nose sticking out, so I’ll just have to assume she’s the most beautiful baby in the world just like all the others. My granddaughter appears to be doing fine too, but there were too many others in the room talking baby talk for us to have any meaninful conversation. We’ll have time for that later.
Boxy–
That reminds me of the MukityMuck who said that Clinton better not set foot on his base.
Clinton let it slide. He shoulda busted that POS down to buck private and had him slopping out the latrines.
You can tell from the way the Navy grads hugged Obama that he was just shaking in his boots.
And btw, implying that our troops aren’t loyal to their Commander in Chief is despicable. If you’re implying that you want to see them do him harm, I’ll gladly report you to the Secret Service, where they take those kinds of things very seriously.
Reggie,
“You do realize that you can get a pass on about anything now as Great Grandparents are incapable of making errors. :)”
I’ve been banking on that! One of the few advantages of making Old Fart status.
Boxic,
“Oh, and Jed, no matter what side of the ‘issues’ we are on, and how heated our arguments sometimes become, we all want the very best for our children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren….I am convinced of that.”
Of course we do, isn’t that what our arguments have all been about?
Hey Gittrich, how do you feel about Carhart coming to start a new clinic in Wichita?
P-Mom,
“… how do you feel about Carhart coming to start a new clinic in Wichita?
I’m certainly glad he is, but I still mourn Dr. Tiller. I hope Dr. Carhart has a better time of it than Dr. Tiller had.
Well, I hope that Dr. Carhart will build a fortress. And I swear, we might have to start doing whatever it takes to keep him and others safe.
LIBs are very angry people, I am glad I am not an angry LIB.
Political_mama,
I suggest buying a bayonet.
You’re darn right I’m angry that people are being murdered and terrorized.
Angry LIBs…next thing you know there will be bombings and arson..
Oh, wait…that has happened, time and time again.
ELF
CEO
Ant,
“…next thing you know there will be bombings and arson..
Oh, wait…that has happened, time and time again.”
Yeah, at Women’s Health Care Services.
Face it.. the troops hate President Obama:
http://beta.sling.com/video/show/140075/67/Raw-Video:-Obama-Meets-Troops-in-Ir
Heh, the cons are sure howling after David Lettermam.
Damned hypocrites. The same rotten to the core creeps who gave Hillary Clinton such hell for two decades.
PROBABLY POSSIBLE!
Sounds like something Obama would say.
SEOUL, South Korea — South Korea was bracing for a possible third nuclear test by North Korea, which a U.S. official said was likely despite looming U.N. sanctions on the communist state for its previous test in May.
Given the North’s track record of provocative behavior and defiance of the United Nations, “common sense” would dictate that it is preparing for another nuclear test, South Korean Defense Ministry spokesman Won Tae-jae told reporters Friday.
He said the test was “probably possible.”
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,525933,00.html
If Obama Had Balls -
He’d tell North Korea that if there was a 3rd Nuclear test held by North Korea, the United States would sponsor the 4th, 5th, and 6th nuclear tests in Korea. Gratis.
Ladies and Gentlemen I present to you –
Obama the Hypocrite
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/12/obama-congratulates-congress-stiff-new-tobacco-regulations/
Obama Struggles With Smoking ‘Addiction’ as He Praises Congress for New Tobacco Regulations
The White House admitted President Obama still struggles with his smoking habit on the same day he congratulated Congress Friday for passing tough new regulations that puts tobacco under control of the Food and Drug Administration.
Political_mama
Posted June 12, 2009 at 7:44 pm | Permalink
Hey Gittrich, how do you feel about Carhart coming to start a new clinic in Wichita?
———–
Pmomma is Gleeful about Baby Killins Kontinuing in Kansas!
Yes! Aren’t you so happy Pmomma!
(Who’s paying for your next abortion Pmomma?)
Save the chunks for Pmomma!
Ahmadine-Fraud?
Ahmadinejad reportedly takes 80 percent of votes but rival says he’s clear victor, warns of possible fraud (FoxNews)
Where’s that big defeat of Ahmadinejad that OBAMA inspired?
Was the opposition NOT inspired by Obama? Did Obama have the opposite effect?
Or maybe, just maybe, the Iranian ACORN was involved in election fraud!?!
Gasoline up another 10 cents/gallon in the US.
WTF is Obama doing about it?
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/wrgp/mogas_home_page.html
#
ANTI
Posted June 12, 2009 at 8:02 pm | Permalink
ELF
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=
???
http://img1.picturewizard.com/1328EF4/0/elf.jpg
Thank You Obama for releasing Gitmo terrorists!
They Kill more Americans now and make you Happy!
Ticker Tape Parade in Saudia Arabia where Obama Kissed the Kings ‘Ring’.
(Obama obeys his Muslim brothers’ commands!)
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/12/obama-wont-rule-freeing-guantanamo-detainees/
Murder Suspect Gets Saudi Welcome
One of 3 Gitmo detainees transferred to Saudi Arabia had been implicated in terror-related murder of American
Obama Sings:
If tomorrow all the things were gone
I’d worked for all my life,
And I had to start again
with just my children and my wife,
I’d thank my lucky stars
to be living here today,
‘Cause the flag still stands for freedom
and they can’t take that away.
I’m proud to be a Saudi Arabian
where at least I know I’m free,
And I won’t forget the men who died
who gave that right to me,
And I gladly stand up next to you
and defend her still today,
‘Cause there ain’t no doubt I love this land
God Bless Saudi Arabia!
From the Persian Gulf
to the sands of Mekkah,
Across the oil fields of Brydah,
from oil well to oil well.
From Jeddah down to Hofuf Mubarraz
and Khamis Mushayt to Tabuk,
There’s pride in every Saudi Arabian heart
and it’s time we stand and say:
I’m proud to be a Saudi Arabian
where at least I know I’m free,
And I won’t forget the men who died
who gave that right to me,
And I gladly stand up next to you
and defend her still today,
‘Cause there ain’t no doubt I love this land
God Bless Saudi Arabia.
Well, Max–
If the Saudi was guilty of murder, why didn’t Bush charge him and convict him?
No evidence, perhaps?
BTW, given that Obama’s granduncle stormed Normandy, why don’t you take your little song and cram it.
Sideways.
Not my song Capn.
It’s your fearless leaders song.
You better learn the tune soon.
First time I heard Lee Greenwoods version of I’m Proud to Be an American, was at a 4th of July fireworks display in a very small town.
It sent chills up my spine, brought a pallor to my cheek, and a mist before my eye.
Obama’s version of patriotism is nothing like what America has seen before. HE has brought nothin but words of weakness and shame to America. He has not inspired, he has brought fear. He has not fostered a sense of self-worth, he has fosterd a sense of worthlessness requiring a Government to support you, because you are too weak and too frail to take care of yourself.
You are not what makes America strong. Government is what makes America strong.
More people voted for Obama in 2008 than voted for Bush in EITHER ELECTION.
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
Heh.
Sucks to be you.
I’ll find the post later, but it was a great post. I believe it was from American Way.
A rough translation:
Those who are labeled as speaking up and opposing Government policy today are labeled as terrorists or Right Wing Extremists.
Instead, what the people are doing today, by voicing their views and exorcising their 1st Amendment rights while they still can, is PARTICIPATING in Government, not opposing it.
You Libs don’t seem to be able to handle any opposition. In spite of your professed ways of supporting diverse views, you do nothing but stifle the views of anyone who opposes you.
And you call yourselves Americans who love Freedom, when clearly, you only love Freedom for those who support your views.
Jimbo:
1. Proposes nuclear strikes against Korea and the killing of millions of civilians who are victims of the regime;
2. Suggests the president lower gasoline prices.. (who was POTUS when gas was $4/gal.?);
3. Baselessly claims that the President is submisive to the Saudis;
4. Does an irrelevant song edit…
5. Suggests the scores or hundreds of GITMO prisoners freed by Bush and Obama were terrorist (contrary to the military men who approved the releases;
6. And reveals how weak, powerless and worthless he now feels…
I guess I can agree with his final one!
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
More people voted for Obama in 2008 than voted for Bush in EITHER ELECTION.
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
——————–
You Libs embrace diversity?
You Libs embrace racist comments like this?
Capn I can’t type slow enough for you to get it but I’ll repost Chass’s post that my question was all about. You went off on your own tangent and all I wanted was for Chasss to tell me where he got his information.
———-
Chas
Posted June 12, 2009 at 1:17 pm | Permalink
That SWORD thing was implemented following 9/11 — in 2001
———-
Never did get the answer BTW. No such rule, law, etc… was ever issued to my knowledge. Obviously each stadium is allowed to have their own set of rules.
No no, Jimbo, we just think lies do not contribute to civil debate…
You knw you are free to lie and free to hold opinions unsupported by evidence or backed by rational thought.
And it does stir up your lunatic fellow-travelers who wind up shooting policemen.
Your pathetic David.
Nice attempt at re-writing history though. You Libs have much experience in these attempts.
Try harder.
you do nothing but stifle the views of anyone who opposes you.
Freud called that projection.
Let’s trip down memory lane, shall we:
Criticizing the President in a time of war is TREASON.
You libs oppose the President’s war because you LOVE TERRORISTS.
You want our soldiers to die in Iraq just so you can say you were right.
You are cheese-eating surrender monkeys.
If you don’t like Bush, why don’t you move to FRANCE with the other cowards.
You want the war in Iraq to fail.
*****
Bring back any memories there, Max?
DavidB
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:32 pm | Permalink
No no, Jimbo, we just think lies do not contribute to civil debate…
———-
Oh right,
There are no lies on the lib side!
Try again.
“JimJohnson” oozes –
“First time I heard Lee Greenwoods version of I’m Proud to Be an American, was at a 4th of July fireworks display in a very small town. “
There’s another version?
You should go to Branson, Missouri where Lee sings a medley of his hit.
DavidB
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:32 pm | Permalink
No no, Jimbo, we just think lies do not contribute to civil debate…
You knw you are free to lie and free to hold opinions unsupported by evidence or backed by rational thought.
And it does stir up your lunatic fellow-travelers who wind up shooting policemen.
————————
Who shot the 4 Oakland cops last year?
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:14 pm | Permalink
BTW, given that Obama’s granduncle stormed Normandy, why don’t you take your little song and cram it.
—————
Oh, that’s BJ’s excuse for being an American Patriot.
His relatives were patriots.
Therefore, HE has to do nothing.
7. Reveals he has no idea what racism is…
OKO–
Nice attempt at diversion.
Obviously, the change in spectators having swords would have taken place after 9-11 which was in 2001. The next time it took effect for the Navy graduation would have been Spring of 2002.
I don’t know if this is exactly when the changes happened or not. Some people who know think it was.
I can’t google the results that far back. I did find, as you have seen, that the wording was exactly the same in 2009 as it was in 2008, so when The Washington Times blamed Obama for it, and you and Heckler piled on, you were wrong.
Heckler had the guts to say it was wrong.
“Oh, and Jed, no matter what side of the ‘issues’ we are on, and how heated our arguments sometimes become, we all want the very best for our children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren….I am convinced of that.”—Box
“Of course we do, isn’t that what our arguments have all been about?”—Jed
And maybe that is a place we can mutually agree to start from to better come together for a mutually agreed on worthwhile and ultimate goal of a better life for them.
Congrats on your new family member, God’s Blessings on Abigail, and I hope you wish the same for for my granddaughter as well.
What lies have the libs told, Max.
That there were tons and tons of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq?
“You’re darn right I’m angry that people are being murdered and terrorized.”—P_mama
You are speaking about those defenseless, innocent developing babies aren’t you?
11 cops killed by stirred up anti-Obama extremists since the election….
11 and counting…
Lovelle Mixon, an ex-con who served time for assault with a deadly weapon, killed the 4 officers in Oakland…
“Face it.. the troops hate President Obama:”—DavidB
Yeah….nothing but a staged political announcement probably.
JimJohnson
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:35 pm | Permalink
DavidB
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:32 pm | Permalink
No no, Jimbo, we just think lies do not contribute to civil debate…
You knw you are free to lie and free to hold opinions unsupported by evidence or backed by rational thought.
And it does stir up your lunatic fellow-travelers who wind up shooting policemen.
————————
Who shot the 4 Oakland cops last year?
JimJohnson
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:35 pm | Permalink
DavidB
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:32 pm | Permalink
No no, Jimbo, we just think lies do not contribute to civil debate…
You knw you are free to lie and free to hold opinions unsupported by evidence or backed by rational thought.
And it does stir up your lunatic fellow-travelers who wind up shooting policemen.
————————
Who shot the 4 Oakland cops last year?
“#
Oh, that’s BJ’s excuse for being an American Patriot.
His relatives were patriots.
Therefore, HE has to do nothing.
#
On the contrary.
I have to fight the evil con greed heads that would destroy the country my family helped build. Members of my family MADE this country while other people just made money. It is time to redress that.
Oh, nobody in KS knows about the 4 cops killed in San Francisco?
But you do know about the one museum security guard killed in Washington DC!
Huh.
You have selective outrage at murders then.
Only pay attention to the ‘important’ people who are murdereed.
Nobody else matters.
“Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
Heh.”—-Capn
Wow….imagine that, a Dim-liberal racist!!!
Tell me Capn, just how bad must one be to put a “black dude” in the White House?
What a racist hypocrite.
So those troops in Baghdad whooping and hollering for their president were .. what… not real soldiers???
FOX VIDEO: http://www.videodust.com/videos/2009/04/08/U-S-Troops-in-Baghdad-Cheer-Obama-Surprise.html
“President Obama swooped into Baghdad under a cloak of secrecy today, but his presence quickly turned into a raucous meeting with several hundred U.S. troops who cheered wildly when he told them it is time for Iraqis to take responsibility for their country
It wasn’t last year. It was this year. Time flies.
In October 2007, Lovelle Mixon was released on parole after serving five years of a six-year sentence for assault with a firearm. Within months the 26-year-old Oakland resident was in trouble again, authorities said.
In February, Mixon was placed on a parole hold as a possible suspect in a homicide in Alameda County, according to Scott Kernan, undersecretary of operations for the state Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Prosecutors declined to file charges in that case, saying there was not sufficient evidence, but Mixon was detained on various parole violations and sent back to prison for nine months, Kernan said.
Here is a look at Mixon’s interactions with the parole department since his Nov. 1 release from the California Correctional Center in Susanville, as reported by the department :
Nov. 3: Mixon reports to his parole agent for an initial interview and undergoes his first mandatory drug test.
Nov. 5: Mixon reports to Parole and Community Team, a state program that offers a broad range of services to parolees. The agency provides job placement, drug treatment and other services. During the visit, he met with his parole agent and again was tested for drugs.
Nov. 7: Mixon’s parole agent makes an initial residential visit, meeting with Mixon at his mother’s home in Oakland. The agent also met with relatives of Mixon to evaluate his living conditions and who he was interacting with while on parole. During the visit, Mixon is referred by the agent to America Work, an employment service.
Dec. 17: Mixon’s parole agent makes a residential visit, also meeting with one of Mixon’s cousins as part of their continuing effort to assess his family situation.
Dec. 19: Mixon reports to the parole office and takes a drug test.
Jan. 6: Mixon reports to the parole office and takes a drug test.
Jan. 23: Mixon’s parole agent makes a residential visit and refers Mixon to another employment service, Project Choice Employment.
Feb. 6: Mixon reports to the parole office and takes a drug test.
Feb. 18: Mixon’s parole agent makes a residential visit but cannot locate him.
Feb. 24: Mixon’s parole agent makes another residential visit but Mixon cannot be located. The agent talks with his mother.
Feb. 26: After another residential visit, the agent still cannot locate Mixon.
Feb. 27: The parole agent prepares a parolee-at-large report and a warrant is issued for Mixon’s arrest. The state Board of Parole Hearings suspends Mixon’s parole effective Feb. 19, the day after his parole officer first failed to find him. The case is referred to the corrections department’s Fugitive Apprehension Team.
March 6: The Fugitive Apprehension Team and members of the Oakland Police Department visit three Oakland addresses, including Mixon’s mother’s home, his address of record. The following week, they distribute a bulletin to the Oakland Police Department. The case is also referred to the U.S. Marshals Service to check on reports that Mixon might have been in the Auburn, Wash., area. They are unable to locate him.
March 21: Mixon is pulled over by Oakland motorcycle officers for a traffic violation shortly after 1 p.m. Authorities said he began shooting at the officers, killing Sgt. Mark Dunakin, 40, and fatally wounding Officer John Hege, 41. After trying to hide in a nearby apartment building where his sister lives, Mixon kills Oakland SWAT sergeants Ervin Romans, 43, and Daniel Sakai, 35, before he is shot and killed by police.
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/mar/24/local/me-oakland-paroleside24
DavidB
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:47 pm | Permalink
11 cops killed by stirred up anti-Obama extremists since the election….
11 and counting…
————-
Link?
Or just admit you are lying.
Jim!! YOU CAN CUT AND PASTE SO WELL!!! YER FAB!!
I don’t see the point, but at least this post is not full of lies, distortions and made up crap.. Congratulations!
LEFT WING EXTREMIST
Cop-killer raped 2 on day of attack, police say
The man who gunned down four Oakland police officers had robbed and raped two women at gunpoint earlier the same day as they set up a food cart in East Oakland, police said Monday.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/05/05/MN6917EDG8.DTL
Cap you are so over the board tonight I can’t keep up. You are a racist, no you are a pacifist, no you are defending O’bama, no you are supporting Chass, no you aren’t doing anything constructive. I never expect you to admit you were chasing the wrong idea all night long but I have to go so just carry on without me. You do that so well.
Lovelle Mixon
LEFT WING EXTREMIST
RAPIST
COP KILLER
Where’s the outrage in Kansas?
Yet, there’s outrage about a Washington DC murder!?!
That happens every other day in Washington DC!
BlueJay
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:53 pm | Permalink
“#
Oh, that’s BJ’s excuse for being an American Patriot.
His relatives were patriots.
Therefore, HE has to do nothing.
#
On the contrary.
I have to fight the evil con greed heads that would destroy the country my family helped build. Members of my family MADE this country while other people just made money. It is time to redress that.
—————
I agree.
At some point -
YOU
Have to pull your own weight.
Even XXX would agree, I dare say.
BJ,
Starting today,
Make an oath to yourself, and to the WE Blog, to solemly swear on a box of Cheerios, to stand on your own two feet, and carry your own weight, for the remaining days of your life, so help you General Mills.
“JimJohnson
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:27 pm | Permalink
I’ll find the post later, but it was a great post. I believe it was from American Way.
A rough translation:
Those who are labeled as speaking up and opposing Government policy today are labeled as terrorists or Right Wing Extremists.”
I posted something about this.
I’ll be damned if I can find it.
I believe DavidB or some other crybaby had posted how they had gone to a council meeting or some such thing, and he was whining about how a citizen screamed and got “into a policemans’ face” on an issue. DavidB stated this person was a terrorist.
My response was, no, this citizen was participating in government. Or words to that effect.
Apparently that is an act no longer allowable under the Reich Obama and liberal democrats new world order.
” Members of my family MADE this country ”
So Bluejay, do you suppose your family worked hard to MADE this country – so you could sit on your skinny *ss and collect welfare?
What is YOUR contribution? Beotching does NOT count.
Did Mixon commit a HATE CRIME?
GASP!
HAHAHA!! Left Wing Extremist!! Ahh there you go lying again… what a disappointment, Jimbo…
Have fun.. and remember, there is no extra charge for posting total lies and fabrications..
If you want to recruit “XXX” to your side “Jim” you will have to do it without my help.
“Jim!! YOU CAN CUT AND PASTE SO WELL!!! YER FAB!!”
Hey JJ, don’t let DavidB get to you. He cain’t read so well. And you should check his math out on last nights open thread…..
American_Way
Posted June 12, 2009 at 10:13 pm | Permalink
” Members of my family MADE this country ”
So Bluejay, do you suppose your family worked hard to MADE this country – so you could sit on your skinny *ss and collect welfare?
What is YOUR contribution? Beotching does NOT count.
—————-
Oh no!
BJ’s family didn’t work hard.
His family took advantage of the Welfare Clause of the US Constitution.
BJ’s family lived off the backs of the Americans who did work hard for a living.
BJ/JR is carrying on his great family tradition.
““Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House. Heh.”—-Capn
CapnUnAmerican really said that?
What a dip sh*t.
The only person an this blog that collects welfare so far as anyone knows “American (Hank) way” is the poster called “Regular”.
JimJohnson,
You sound angry.
I’ll be sure ta member that life is like a box of choco lots.
I will copy and past several times, till I get it right.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
“BJ’s family lived off the backs of the Americans who did work hard for a living.”
Then BJ is a liar. I don’t think they had debit cards for food stamps back then. I’m sure they didn’t have healthcare provided by the HARD WORK OF OTHER AMERICANS back then.
But Bluejay wouldn’t have any healthcare for his only son – if not for MY hard work.
JimJohnson,
You sound really angry.
Daniel
Posted June 12, 2009 at 10:18 pm | Permalink
JimJohnson,
You sound angry.
=============
You sound stupid.
Guess we’re even.
JimJohnson,
You sound really, really angry.
“JimJohnson,
You sound angry.”
Sorry Daniel, you can’t copy other posters one liners and use them. Particularly since you are an angry lib yourself.
DavidB
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:47 pm | Permalink
11 cops killed by stirred up anti-Obama extremists since the election….
11 and counting…
————-
Link?
Or just admit you are lying.
JimJohnson,
Don’t cry, Jim. It’s gonna be alright.
Using other posters responses takes no brains.
Original thoughts are encouraged.
I know who I am “Jim”.
For four years, the whole blog does too.
Who are you?
Now, a lot of people think you are the blogger formerly known as “Max”. But I’m doubting that.
I think “Max” probably blew his brains out after the election.
Daniel
Posted June 12, 2009 at 10:20 pm | Permalink
JimJohnson,
You sound really, really angry.
————-
You sound really, really stupid.
Guess we are even.
(This could go on all night folks, get your popcorn, and another beer…)
#
American_Way
Posted June 12, 2009 at 10:20 pm | Permalink
“JimJohnson,
You sound angry.”
Sorry Daniel, you can’t copy other posters one liners and use them. Particularly since you are an angry lib yourself.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
But he really does seem angry. Look at his posts.
HAHAHA!! Left Wing Extremist!! Ahh there you go lying again… what a disappointment, Jimbo…
Have fun.. and remember, there is no extra charge for posting total lies and fabrications..
Yes, please dig up this crybaby’s post.. please do…
This anti-government white dude at the meeting was in a community-patrol officer’s face in disrespectful way.. claiming that city inspectors were illegally trespassing as they performed their lawful duties..
The guy didn’t terrorize anyone.. he was being a jerk… I just can’t understand dissing a cop like that – it was like spitting on soldiers….
#
American_Way
Posted June 12, 2009 at 10:22 pm | Permalink
Using other posters responses takes no brains.
Original thoughts are encouraged.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
If you fine one, it’ll be the first, Oh King of the copy/paste.
Now, WE BLOG Editors,
I see you posted a special topic for 1 murder of a security guard in Washington DC.
Let me ask you, did you happen to post a special topic for 4 murders of police officers in Oakland, CA?
The murderer also raped 2 women that day, so I don’t know if that was such a NEWSWORTHY event or not.
Just asking.
Cause…
Well you know, people in Kansas seem to be so concerned about that security guard being murdered in Washington, DC.
So well, you know, I thought maybe 4 Cops Killed and 2 Women Raped by one guy in the same day in Oakland, CA MIGHT warrant a topic too.
Just wondering….
“The guy didn’t terrorize anyone.. he was being a jerk…”
That is not what you posted the other night.
Liar.
“If you fine one”
How much should I fine someone Daniel?
Ten dollars sound fair?
“But he really does seem angry. Look at his posts.”
I think that is why people confuse him with “Max”.
“Max” had a similar habit of posting long strings of screed posts and wetting himself.
Hmm, “Max” would never go toe to toe with me either.
This is what we have had with cons from the beginning of this blog. EVEN in the con stronghold of Kansas, they are fearful and are ever switching nics because they are not clever enough to duel. Lose a fight? Switch your nic.
Hey Weblog!!!
How long has the slease doctor Tiller been dead?
Seems disrespectful not to have another thread in his honor don’t you think?
Aww geee… Now yer going to make me find the post, since you are relying on your unreliable memory.
Yeah, that sounds fair. Pointing out misspellings and typos is especially weak on your part since you aren’t exactly ‘Mr. Perfect’ in that regard.
What is it with BlowJ.
He is constantly obsessing that some poster is some other poster, or was, or is planning to be, or is switching nics, or some other obsessive fear.
And, he wants to physically meet everyone that calls him what he is, a dependent, lazy, socialistic, Marxist DimLib.
What a mental disease to live with.
Has anyone seen this guy….does he have one big eye in the middle of his forehead…..never mind, who the hell cares.
BlueJay
Posted June 12, 2009 at 10:22 pm | Permalink
I know who I am “Jim”.
For four years, the whole blog does too.
Who are you?
Now, a lot of people think you are the blogger formerly known as “Max”. But I’m doubting that.
I think “Max” probably blew his brains out after the election.
—————————–
You know BJ, your comment takes me back to when I was a teenager dealing with a gang in my hometown.
My older USMC brother gave me some good advice, offered to help of course, but I turned him down. I knew I had to take care of myself, and I did.
The exact details of the advice I cannot disclose.
It would involve you ultimately having you being bent over backwards, gaining a new set of shoulder blades in the process, and being able to stick your tongue out to lick the insides of your own intenstinal track.
Now back in my day, after I dealt with the little gang that was threatening me, the school cop and one teacher each called me aside separately and thanked me for kickin their as*. They admitted that there was nothing that they (Government) could do themselves since the gang members were all juvies.
I took care of myself then. I’ll do it again if I have to. I choose not to pursue confrantation if I have to, but will if I must.
So BJ, I humbly decline your request to meet. You seem to want to meet so many on this blog, perhaps you are just lonely, but maybe you are really a pure pyschobicth maniac.
In any case the answer is no.
Should we have to meet, I will do so most effectively, that is your choice, not mine.
But do have a nice day. I know I will.
Bluejay is still that sad and lonely poster who resides on blog 24-7 to gain his since of self worth and ego.
Poor guy, the computer XXX gave the crying JR so he could blog, is probably just about worn out by now.
Save the world. Remember that?
Ain’t happened. Cain’t save himself. Poor son.
No, I am very far from perfect… but I do fail to find the word “terrorist” in my post:
DavidB
Posted June 11, 2009 at 10:51 pm | Permalink
$49.980 net worth… minus $20 = $49,960 net worth.You made up the extra $90 like you make up most of your posted crap?
*****
I went to a community meeting tonight. City inspectors presented info on programs to improve the housing in the neighborhood, including STIMULUS MONEY….
One guy decided to get into a police officers face claiming he was trespassing by accompanying the inspectors.
Here’s a man who straps on a bullet-proof vest everyday and will lay his life down to protect the citizenry, and he has to face down some anti-government nutcase…
11 law officers killed by anti-government nuts since the election….
Sure is strange that RoaCH hasn’t been around in over a week now.
Of course, I HAVE been known to be wrong.
NOT often.
How was it my fault that donndublin, an old cranky man writes just as badly as okobserver an old cranky woman?
But I admitted I was wrong and showed the blog that “don” uses eyeliner.
No wonder the cons are afraid of me.
Since BJ has no cents, his sense of self worth is senseless.
I suppose it was inevitable….
JimJohnson, Internet tough-guy.
Grow up, jackhole.
BlueJay
Posted June 12, 2009 at 10:31 pm | Permalink
“But he really does seem angry. Look at his posts.”
I think that is why people confuse him with “Max”.
“Max” had a similar habit of posting long strings of screed posts and wetting himself.
Hmm, “Max” would never go toe to toe with me either.
This is what we have had with cons from the beginning of this blog. EVEN in the con stronghold of Kansas, they are fearful and are ever switching nics because they are not clever enough to duel. Lose a fight? Switch your nic.
————-
Were you not
JR
before?
“BlowJ.
He is constantly obsessing that some poster is some other poster, or was, or is planning to be, or is switching nics, or some other obsessive fear.”
BJ seems especially enamored with JimJohnson.
I think he is queer for JJ’s gear.
Boxlock20
Posted June 12, 2009 at 10:36 pm | Permalink
What is it with BlowJ.
He is constantly obsessing that some poster is some other poster, or was, or is planning to be, or is switching nics, or some other obsessive fear.
And, he wants to physically meet everyone that calls him what he is, a dependent, lazy, socialistic, Marxist DimLib.
What a mental disease to live with.
Has anyone seen this guy….does he have one big eye in the middle of his forehead…..never mind, who the hell cares.
————————-
Maybe we should ALL meet him.
Well…
The think I have over ya “Jim” and “American way” and “Boxlock20 (I changed my nic to come back)” IS that I am a known quantity here. And you are well….not.
Maybe that matters to the readers. Maybe it only matters to me.
Either way, I’m good.
“Pointing out misspellings and typos is especially weak on your part since you aren’t exactly ‘Mr. Perfect’ in that regard.”—Daniel
Wow…that is something I suffer with from the mental midget DimLibs all the time.
Because I don’t value this dialogue enough to carefully proof read or spend time researching thereby wasting valuable time, if something comes up in error or I commit a typo….oh wow do the DimLibs think they have scored a grand-slam homer.
Tiny minds occupied with tiny things.
“Were you not
JR
before?”
“OUCH!!”
Daniel
Posted June 12, 2009 at 10:37 pm | Permalink
Sure is strange that RoaCH hasn’t been around in over a week now.
————————–
Just ping his IP.
You work at the WE Blog, but won’t admit it, you gutless wonder!
Thank you for letting me clear up any confusion.
I posted here as “J R” and am still known by that nic.
Hank Price, who these days goes by “HLP” among other nics, cried to the editors over the treatment here of Todd Tiahrt and got them to institute registration. “J R” was not available under the new format that HANK PRICE asked for. Did he have something to do with that I don’t know.
JimJohnson
Posted June 12, 2009 at 10:47 pm | Permalink
Just ping his IP.
You work at the WE Blog, but won’t admit it, you gutless wonder!
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-===-=-=-=-=-=-
Close, but no cigar. Ha ha ha!
” anti-government nuts since the election….”
Thanks DavidB. That’s not what you posted tonight. Tonight you said the guy was being a “jerk”.
So you did lie.
Eat your own words.
I can prove who I am “American way”.
How about you prove who you are?
Hey, Hank Price set the standard. But I’m not the bully dishonest thug that he is. The only thing I share in common with that clod is a son with a similar name and adopting his own tactics.
“Hank Price, who these days goes by “HLP” among other nics”
Thank God you finally decided I’m not Hank. That little game by libs (mostly the same stupid posters who are concerned with nic’s; Chas and Bluejay. Very few others waste space with such nonsense.) went on for months until Hank and I together beat em at their stupid game.
aww gee…
The accusation was that I called the miscreant a ‘terrorist.’ Daniel wrote: “DavidB stated this person was a terrorist.”
In a more civilized group, if someone is called a liar, and then is forced to defend his position and provides proof that he indeed had not lied… the accuser would have at least admitted an error and perhaps even offered an apology….
You guys are just no fun..
David lied.
SSDD.
He makes up stories to suit his agenda.
Just like Obama and his Uncle…
“Thank God you finally decided I’m not Hank. ”
Try again.
Say AmWay,
BJ wants to meet you now!
“How about you prove who you are?”
As a matter of fact, I was one of those who emailed Hank in support of his personal visit with the editors. My name (nic) was included with those Hank represented that day.
I still thank Hank for approaching the blog problems in a mature and adult manner.
Much more productive than you and CapnAmerica flooding the blogs with multiple nics – and a stupid blockade, which accomplished nothing.
Maybe we ALL meet BJ at the Lonhorn Saloon.
Oops, Longhorn Saloon.
I have never had multiple nics and was not part of the “blockade”.
If memory serves, “American way” was not posting here then though.
Noon Saturday at the Longhorn Saloon BJ, you up for it?
Get your spurs on.
“Say AmWay, BJ wants to meet you now!”
I’m sure I’m not his type. 20+ years in the service my skin is leather and my balls are hard as nails.
I think BJ is more your type, and I still think a careful review of the blogs of all the inquiries, questions on your nic and person – indicate Bluejay wants a close personal relationship with you!!!
#
BlueJay
Posted June 12, 2009 at 10:57 pm | Permalink
“Thank God you finally decided I’m not Hank. ”
Try again.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
You’re on the wrong trail there. Hank, aka HLP is considerably more intelligent than American_Way.
We’ll have a lil heifer waiting for ya.
American_Way
Posted June 12, 2009 at 11:01 pm | Permalink
“Say AmWay, BJ wants to meet you now!”
I’m sure I’m not his type. 20+ years in the service my skin is leather and my balls are hard as nails.
I think BJ is more your type, and I still think a careful review of the blogs of all the inquiries, questions on your nic and person – indicate Bluejay wants a close personal relationship with you!!!
————
We could have Bessie waitin for him.
She give BJ a real good ride!
Your memory is wrong Bluejay. I was here and had started posting during that crazy time when the blogs became full of worthless threads. The best thing that happened was registration.
A full time employee to monitor blog content is high on my list, but the broke newspaper is barely able to stay afloat now. Too many conservatives and republicans have stopped buying the tabloid news.
Capn disapear after his racist post?
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
“You’re on the wrong trail there. Hank, aka HLP is considerably more intelligent than American_Way.”
I’m quite certain you are correct. Just as certain that you Daniel are a reincarnated poster from the weblog past. You started off trying real hard to be different, noncomittal, and well nice and respectful.
How quickly your true colors are shown.
Oko, Sol, Regular, and myself have nailed you on this.
JimJohnson,
You seem to be angry again.
BJ you wet your panties yet?
Bessie be lookin forward to havin you ride her, with your spurs on.
You wanta meet or not?
Daniel
Posted June 12, 2009 at 11:07 pm | Permalink
JimJohnson,
You seem to be angry again.
=———–
And Danny boy, you still are dumb as ever!
Danny boy,
You hear the pipes of BJ callin you?
Like Rev Wright said, call a spade a spade.
Daniel consider yourself outted. I may not have pinned your original nic – but you are a known entity here. Judging from my email, I’m not the only one watching you.
American_Way
Posted June 12, 2009 at 11:07 pm | Permalink
Oko, Sol, Regular, and myself have nailed you on this.
=-=-==-=-===-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
If what you and the League of Geniuses say is true you should be able to identify me.
Put up, or STFU.
Aw heck Amway, Box, et al,
BJ don’t really want to meet us all at once afterall.
No point in going to jail over some scum like him anyway.
It would be fun though, for awhile.
See
The
Funny
Unicorn
Chaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaas.
But that’s not you. Nice try.
I’m thinking Walker, or maybe even Farmgirl.
I’m a pretty respected poster here.
But I’ll meet with “Jim” “American way” and anyone else they care to invite.
Daniel
Posted June 12, 2009 at 11:10 pm | Permalink
American_Way
Posted June 12, 2009 at 11:07 pm | Permalink
Oko, Sol, Regular, and myself have nailed you on this.
=-=-==-=-===-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
If what you and the League of Geniuses say is true you should be able to identify me.
Put up, or STFU.
———–
Golllllleeeeee!
We might have a shoot-up at the OK Corral afterall!
Danny boy has heard the pipes a callin!
You only go to jail if you get caught……
doing something wrong.
At least for now. Obama is working an angle on that one too.
BlueJay
Posted June 12, 2009 at 11:13 pm | Permalink
I’m a pretty respected poster here.
=====================
That’s a lie.
Start over.
BJ, you ain’t pretty and you ain’t respected neither.
Any honest words in your hide?
Gee last I read “Jim” you were calling me out to meet?
Cold feet?
#
American_Way
Posted June 12, 2009 at 11:10 pm | Permalink
Like Rev Wright said, call a spade a spade.
Daniel consider yourself outted. I may not have pinned your original nic – but you are a known entity here. Judging from my email, I’m not the only one watching you.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=
American_Way,
Consider yourself paranoid. You mean that another poster in the past used to call you on your BS?
Imagine that!
American_Way
Posted June 12, 2009 at 11:14 pm | Permalink
You only go to jail if you get caught……
doing something wrong.
At least for now. Obama is working an angle on that one too.
—————–
I wonder then how much Obama will let us get away with?
President Obama is not here Jim.
I am.
Bluejay, I’m really not opposed to meeting you. But my life is pretty full. I have a list of things I need to do, family I need to see, kids around the country I’d like to see, trips with my wife long overdue, and a honeydo list which fills three whole pages of yellow legal paper (and that’s after buying her the dream house which is only two years old!).
Plus the drive. You are too close to fly and too far to drive, just to allow YOU some face time, which does absolutely nothing for me.
Cold Feet BJ?
That’ll be the day.
Easy to be brave on a blog ain’t it BJ?
Much harder to take care of y’self and y’own kinfolk.
Try it once. Den ya see da light, and the error of your ways.
“Maybe we ALL meet BJ at the Lonhorn Saloon.”
Me, you meant?
I’m game. Don’t make me look for the address. It’s your call.
BlueJay
Posted June 12, 2009 at 11:18 pm | Permalink
President Obama is not here Jim.
I am
———
I can tell the difference.
CapnAmerica
Posted June 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
Your guy was so bad, he put a black dude in the White House.
Yeah, that is about what I thought.
BlueJay
Posted June 12, 2009 at 11:20 pm | Permalink
“Maybe we ALL meet BJ at the Lonhorn Saloon.”
Me, you meant?
I’m game. Don’t make me look for the address. It’s your call.
===============
Brave MF ain’t ya, on a blog.
That’s what I thought BJ.
Won’t meet me.
Don’t want to suffer much do ya? That might be like workin even, or worse.
Aww come on “Jim”.
It was you and “American way” prepared to face me down.
Hell you can throw in Boxlock20, “Regular” and HLP too.
That’s five to one.
About my favorite odds against you miscreants.
American_Way
Posted June 12, 2009 at 11:18 pm | Permalink
I have a list of things I need to do, family I need to see, kids around the country I’d like to see, trips with my wife long overdue, and a honeydo list which fills three whole pages of yellow legal paper (and that’s after buying her the dream house which is only two years old!).
==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-
Sounds like heaven, you should consider yourself a fortunate man.
” You mean that another poster in the past used to call you on your BS?”
Has nothing to do with disagreeing with my posts, correcting my posts, or voicing a logical opinion counter to mine, which makes sense.
It has to do with you showing up out of the blue, knowing how the regulars here post, knowing our history (and don’t try your – all ya gotta do is read crap), the confidence to insult other posters like the regular libs, worrying about nics, the manner of postings, the taking sides and using commonly used lines, and about a half dozen other things.
I’m not going to ask who you used to be again. I really do not care. I don’t care to get caught up in this: HE SAID, THAT YOU SAID, THAT HE SAID, crap and I don’t care if you, bluejay, jr, jm, capnamerica or anyone else have a DOZEN nics.
It means nothing, accomplishes nothing, contributes nothing, it feeds the only two other posters here who still play that childs game, and most importantly – wastes space.
Which leads me to the main reason we can tell you are an old regular: You no longer post any original opinions. No risk taking sharing an original thought. Now you just “play” off other posters. You are feeding from the blog – not really contributing.
Puttin on airs are you , maybe your too good for us eh, ‘bout time you….
You want to interfere with a man’s natural rights?
I’m gonna teach you a lesson.
Oh no let’s go “Jim”!
Wait!
Can you hear it?
I hear Obama callin!!!!
Obama Sings:
If tomorrow all the things were gone
I’d worked for all my life,
And I had to start again
with just my children and my wife,
I’d thank my lucky stars
to be living here today,
‘Cause the flag still stands for freedom
and they can’t take that away.
I’m proud to be a Saudi Arabian
where at least I know I’m free,
And I won’t forget the men who died
who gave that right to me,
And I gladly stand up next to you
and defend her still today,
‘Cause there ain’t no doubt I love this land
God Bless Saudi Arabia!
From the Persian Gulf
to the sands of Mekkah,
Across the oil fields of Brydah,
from oil well to oil well.
From Jeddah down to Hofuf Mubarraz
and Khamis Mushayt to Tabuk,
There’s pride in every Saudi Arabian heart
and it’s time we stand and say:
I’m proud to be a Saudi Arabian
where at least I know I’m free,
And I won’t forget the men who died
who gave that right to me,
And I gladly stand up next to you
and defend her still today,
‘Cause there ain’t no doubt I love this land
God Bless Saudi Arabia.
(I ran out of Gunsmoke scripts! Anyone else got more lines to feed BJ?)
I’m not impressed “Jim”
You said you wanted to meet. Apparently I have called your bluff?
BJ,
You are an a*s.
If we were to meet, it would not be a good thing.
One would go to Bubba’s cell, the other would go to he11.
Which do you prefer?
In other words “JimJohnson” though you invited a meeting, you are afraid of me?
“If we were to meet, it would not be a good thing.”
No it wouldn’t.
For you.
No BJ,
You can’t keep up on a blog, so you have to somehow save face.
I can understand your pain.
You are an as*hole. That must be painful.
BUT, you can Change! Your new Lord is now the President of the United States!
Fire up for victory and go out and celebrate your new found wealth!
Why spend so much time bloggin when now you be rich?!?
#
American_Way
Posted June 12, 2009 at 11:26 pm | Permalink
” You mean that another poster in the past used to call you on your BS?”
Has nothing to do with disagreeing with my posts, correcting my posts, or voicing a logical opinion counter to mine, which makes sense.
It has to do with you showing up out of the blue, knowing how the regulars here post, knowing our history (and don’t try your – all ya gotta do is read crap), the confidence to insult other posters like the regular libs, worrying about nics, the manner of postings, the taking sides and using commonly used lines, and about a half dozen other things.
I’m not going to ask who you used to be again. I really do not care. I don’t care to get caught up in this: HE SAID, THAT YOU SAID, THAT HE SAID, crap and I don’t care if you, bluejay, jr, jm, capnamerica or anyone else have a DOZEN nics.
It means nothing, accomplishes nothing, contributes nothing, it feeds the only two other posters here who still play that childs game, and most importantly – wastes space.
Which leads me to the main reason we can tell you are an old regular: You no longer post any original opinions. No risk taking sharing an original thought. Now you just “play” off other posters. You are feeding from the blog – not really contributing.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
I hope that you feel better now that you’ve gotten that off your chest.
How do most posters show up if not out of the blue?
If my posts here contribute nothing, offer nothing, and mean nothing why are you so wound up about them?
For the record, I could give a fu ck what you think. I’m just here for chits and giggles. You seem to have a lot more invested in this blog than that.
Don’t throw flowers at me while you are running away “JimJohnson”
Just go change your nic like ya done before.
BlueJay
Posted June 12, 2009 at 11:36 pm | Permalink
“If we were to meet, it would not be a good thing.”
No it wouldn’t.
For you.
———–
It wouldn’t be good for either of us BJ.
One would be dead. One would be with Bubba.
Which do you prefer?
Good night BJ. You may now chat with XXX and your other Liberal friends who can barely tolerate you on a blog, much less, face to face.
Consdier this: How much time will anyone have to blog, if nuclear war breaks out tonight in the Far East?
Sleep soundly, and know, that Obama is there!
Where’d “American way” and “Boxlock20″ go?
Up their own butts?
Buh bye “Jim”.
You are no longer marginally relevant here.
American_Way,
Do you guys really email each other discussing the secret identities of other posters?
I guess that’s sweet in a pathetic sort of way.
#
JimJohnson
Posted June 12, 2009 at 11:39 pm | Permalink
BlueJay
Posted June 12, 2009 at 11:36 pm | Permalink
“If we were to meet, it would not be a good thing.”
No it wouldn’t.
For you.
———–
It wouldn’t be good for either of us BJ.
One would be dead. One would be with Bubba.
Which do you prefer?
Good night BJ. You may now chat with XXX and your other Liberal friends who can barely tolerate you on a blog, much less, face to face.
Consdier this: How much time will anyone have to blog, if nuclear war breaks out tonight in the Far East?
Sleep soundly, and know, that Obama is there!
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Incontrovertible proof that JimJohnson is all hat and no cattle.
“Marine dress uniforms, often include the wear of a sword. If you find any photos of the 2009 graduation of future Marines, you might find your swords.”
Regular, Marines have two swords. Officers wear or are armed with the Mameluke and enlisted the NCO Sword. When officers and NCO’s wear swords they are considered to be under arms.
I have carried my sword with cammies, charlies, dress A’s, and our more well known dress blues.
Not sure on this later, but I believe the only service which has swords for enlisted is the Marines.
BTW, in recruit training – the recruits are not wearing swords (unless for instructional purposes). Enlisted Corporal (E4) NCO’s, SNCO’s, and officers are authorized the sword. Not the junior Marines (probably because they’d end up getting hurt playing rambo).
Well “Jim” is damned impressive.
He can call me names and try and get me to fight XXX.
What he’s got and who he is outside that he won’t show.
BlueJay headed for nest. Targets destroyed.
“If my posts here contribute nothing, offer nothing, and mean nothing why are you so wound up about them?”
Go read again (sigh). Chasing your tail wasting space trying to identity other posters, their personal lives, their looks, their jobs, and particularly nics – is what I was referring to.
Post something of content. Something about the issues of the day, an original thought or opinion. Be brave. Don’t be afraid someone might not approve.
Try it sometime. It won’t hurt.
So are we all in for lunch tomorrow at the Longhorn Saloon at noon?
Northwest corner of Kellogg and Tyler Road, right?
“BlueJay headed for nest. Targets destroyed.”
In other words, Bluejay isn’t here to post his personal opinions on the issues nor engage in discussions on the issues of the day….
Posting guidelines mean nothing to him.
His fulfillment in life is to play games with other posters on the blog. Sad.
The weblog isn’t about keeping score and one-upping another poster.
It should be about exchanging ideas and opinions on the issues important to each of us. Perhaps learning something from another point of view. Perhaps sharing a point of view others had not considered.
Perhaps that’s why so many regulars have left.
#
American_Way
Posted June 12, 2009 at 11:53 pm | Permalink
“If my posts here contribute nothing, offer nothing, and mean nothing why are you so wound up about them?”
Go read again (sigh). Chasing your tail wasting space trying to identity other posters, their personal lives, their looks, their jobs, and particularly nics – is what I was referring to.
Post something of content. Something about the issues of the day, an original thought or opinion. Be brave. Don’t be afraid someone might not approve.
Try it sometime. It won’t hurt.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
For the record, I never took any interest in posters alternative nics until you accused me of being a former poster or whatever without any proof. I figured I’d throw a little back on you to illustrate how ridiculous you were being but you picked up the ball and ran with it instead. Look back through the posts if it really matters to you.
The funny thing is that I suspect that we agree on much more than we disagree on.
Heck guys, agree to meet him since that’s what he’s fixated on. Let him name the place and time, as in “Dillon’s parking lot, Central and Rock Rd., high noon”, as I recall him challenging. Sounds like a grade B, Spaghetti Western doesn’t it.
Anyway, the dunce will probably stand there until he wets his pants and then goes home never figuring out he’s been punked.
And….he’ll think he’s won. Sad but true, a product of poor government schools and some genetic screw up.
Out of here…..night all.
American_Way,
Let me ask you…does Boxlock20 contribute anything of worth to the WE Blog with his 12:05 am post?
“The weblog isn’t about keeping score and one-upping another poster.”
Of course it is and always has been.
And I am damned good at it.
I’ve met con posters. I find almost nothing redeeming in them. I have a particular gift for destroying them whether I have met them or not.
I have no interest in diplomacy with people I do not like who want to hurt me. I afford them the same.
What a mess!!
hi,
i was wondering where can i watch or download full metal alchemist the 2nd episode 11 been searching for it…
no of the links are working….
Hey
I wanted to share with you a wonderful site I just came across teaching [url=http://www.kravmagabootcamp.com][b]Krav Maga[/b][/url] like they teach it in the Israeli Army (IDF) If you guys have seen the Tv Show called Fight Quest you would have seen their chief instructor Ran Nakash there. Anyways, I think it’s worth a look. I’ve been a member for the last 4 months, and I’ve been loving every momen of it.
Hope I’ve helped someone here,
all the best
Hey
I wanted to share with you a very unique site I just came across teaching [url=http://www.kravmagabootcamp.com][b]Krav Maga[/b][/url] For All Levels If you guys have seen the Discovery Channel TV Show called Fight Quest you would have seen their chief instructor Ran Nakash there. Anyways, I think it’s worth a look. I’ve been a member for the last 4 months, and I’ve been loving every second of it.
Hope I’ve helped someone here,
all the best