Pringles are officially potato chips, at least in England. Britain’s Supreme Court of Judicature made that ruling, which was bad news for Pringles maker Procter & Gamble, because it means it owes $160 million in taxes. In Britain, most food is exempt from value-added taxes, but potato chips and “similar products” are taxable. Procter & Gamble argued that Pringles weren’t potato chips but were “savory snacks.”
Registered?
Commenting on WE Blog now requires you to be a Kansas.com member. Use the links above to register, if you haven't already, or to log in.Contact us
Follow us
Daily Archives
-
Recent Comments
- Regular on Open thread 11/22
- DavidB on Health care reform would save state money
- DavidB on Minority status in Senate; majority approval at home
- JimJohnson on Open thread 11/22
- American_Way on Open thread 11/22
- American_Way on Open thread 11/22
- cosmos_originally on Open thread 11/22
- JimJohnson on Open thread 11/22
- DavidB on Open thread 11/22
- DavidB on Open thread 11/22

8 Comments
Is KAKE 10 TV weather forcaster, Ben Pringle, affected by this decision?
TOO funny JWink!
“savory snacks.” – more like salted, compressed card board…
Darn activist judges. Now I gotta eat potato chips instead of my compressed pieces of fried potato mash. What’s next? Are they going to declare that candy corn isn’t really a vegetable?
Sorry Brits,
I like my chips, crisps, fries and mashed potatoes made out of (would you believe?) Potatoes!
What the hell is a “savory snack”??
“Procter & Gamble argued that Pringles weren’t potato chips but were “savory snacks.””
It’s a legal defense AND a commercial.
It’s two two two lies in one!
I tend to shy away from anything that’s required by law to be identified as “food.” As in “Imitation Pasteurized Process Cheese Food Product.”