Prejean in hot water over racy photos

Miss USAFirst there was the gay marriage question at the Miss USA pageant. Now Miss California Carrie Prejean is in hot water for posing for racy modeling pictures several years ago. What’s more, she assured the Miss California USA pageant, after one of the photos was released, that only one photo existed. But then a second was released, and there reportedly are two more. Prejean had signed a contract with Miss California USA stating she has never been photographed nude or partially nude. As a result, she could lose her Miss California crown. Oh, the horror. Also, it was reported earlier that the Miss California USA pageant paid for Prejean to get breast implants.
Who knew there was so much scandal potential in a beauty pageant? Will Prejean continue to be a heroine of the religious right?

115 Comments

  1. American_Way
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 12:38 pm | Permalink

    No she is not. She stands for her convictions.

    Again, libs attack! Draw your swords and shoot each other!

    Attack!

    This gawd damn woman had the audacity to speak her mind. She is guilty of the crime of believing marriage is between one man and one woman.

    And Dirty.com, is making money on helping destroy her.

    Typical liberal knee-jerk reaction.
    First reaction: Attack.

    Ms. California would not be a thread lead, if not for her honest answer to one question. The swimsuit contest revealed more flesh than photo’s revealed thus far. And that was broadcast on tv as PG.

  2. American_Way
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 12:40 pm | Permalink

    Darn women anyway! Who the heck do they think they are speaking their minds, showing off their bodies, daring to disagree!

    Let’s show her who is boss.
    Let’s see some muslim law!!!!

    Keep those woman home and pregnant.

  3. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 12:41 pm | Permalink

    I wonder if this story was broken on perezhilton.com?

  4. Regular
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 12:44 pm | Permalink

    #
    brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 12:41 pm | Permalink

    I wonder if this story was broken on perezhilton.com?
    —————————
    Probably.

    That guy needs a lead enema…

  5. RFL
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 12:50 pm | Permalink

    I hope they do her the favor of firing her.

    She will be looked on as some kind of martyr for how vindictive and hatefull the Left really is.

  6. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 12:51 pm | Permalink

    “Regular
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 12:44 pm | Permalink
    …That guy needs a lead enema…”

    you volunteering? or just wanting to insert something in him?

  7. Barnie
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 12:52 pm | Permalink

    Poor Republicans, receiving blow after humiliating blow. Well, if conservatives weren’t so pretentious, maybe stuff like this wouldn’t be such a big deal. But they set the bar way too high, and apparently have a midget trying to high jump over it.

  8. Regular
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 12:52 pm | Permalink

    #
    brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 12:51 pm | Permalink

    “Regular
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 12:44 pm | Permalink
    …That guy needs a lead enema…”

    you volunteering? or just wanting to insert something in him?
    ——————–
    Was going to use your mouth, since it seems to be a major blowhard on this blog. :)

  9. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 12:55 pm | Permalink

    that’s what she said

  10. American_Way
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 12:56 pm | Permalink

    “receiving blow after humiliating blow”

    How is this a blow? This chicks hot!
    Isn’t it nice to see a darn good looking chick who has biblical principles?

    I go topless to the beach why can’t the dames?
    (Well I used to but now it takes a whole bottle of SPF50 to cover me)

  11. outlander
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 12:57 pm | Permalink

    Ah, the petty politics of personal destruction by the homo lobby.

    So what are they saying here? That anyone who has ever been photographed semi-nude has no right to state her opinion on yag marriage? Hang onto the strength of your convictions, Ms. Calyfornya.

  12. American_Way
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 12:57 pm | Permalink

    Oh I forgot, libs couldn’t stand Sarah for having good looks either.

  13. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 12:58 pm | Permalink

    “RFL
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 12:50 pm | Permalink
    I hope they do her the favor of firing her.”

    Whether she is fired or not, I anticipate her 15 minutes of fame fading soon and the slippery slope to centerfold, ‘gentleman’s magazine’ centerfold, exotic dancing, and low budget pRon starting (culminating with girl on girl as she tears up a marriage certificate).

  14. American_Way
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 12:59 pm | Permalink

    Barack Obama smoked dope and shot up cocaine and became the libs hero and United States President.

    This kid shows a little flesh and the tolerant, party of inclusion – cain’t stand it!

  15. outlander
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:00 pm | Permalink

    Brian is not a liberal though. He is just demeaning to women.

  16. American_Way
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:00 pm | Permalink

    Can someone define “racy”?

    I believe her contract discussed nude and semi nude.

  17. American_Way
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:01 pm | Permalink

    The contact was over bush and boobs.

    I don’t see racy fitting that.

  18. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:01 pm | Permalink

    “outlander
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:00 pm | Permalink
    Brian is not a liberal though. He is just demeaning to women.”

    Hey j*acka55, I am not a Republican!

  19. American_Way
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:02 pm | Permalink

    contract

    (go away Anti – making sign of cross with hands)

  20. outlander
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:02 pm | Permalink

    Hey toad face, what you are is a sexist.

  21. Regular
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:02 pm | Permalink

    I don’t understand these attacks on a woman in a beauty contest.

    What is wrong with the world?

    The Libs have turned into bitter, yapping chihuahuas.

    Of course, from entries by the local leftist libs, it shouldn’t be a surprise just how bitter and attack-mode based they are.

    Brian Nuevo claims to be an independent, but is one of the first to attack others with snide, crude remarks. One can’t even make a comment on a story without Brian attacking another poster.

    Nobody needs that – especially from someone who denies being a leftist liberal.

  22. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:05 pm | Permalink

    “Regular
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:02 pm | Permalink
    …Nobody needs that – especially from someone who denies being a leftist liberal.”

    So who is it needed from – rightist conservatives? You don’t seem to have a problem with that….

  23. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:07 pm | Permalink

    The thing is….

    hypocrisy is funny.

  24. Regular
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:07 pm | Permalink

    Sorry brian, your discourse of late is contemptible, I do not wish to converse with you.

  25. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:08 pm | Permalink

    “Regular
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:02 pm | Permalink
    …Brian Nuevo claims to be an independent, but is one of the first to attack others with snide, crude remarks. One can’t even make a comment on a story without Brian attacking another poster.”

    ouch. you are bitter now aren’t you? I burned you good!

  26. American_Way
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    Which males here have a problem with looking at a good woman?

  27. writerdog
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:15 pm | Permalink

    It was not like she suddenly burst onto the stage, grabbed a mike and shouted her condemnation of gay marriage. She was asked a question and answered it honestly later in a MSNBC interview Hilton stated that the pageant candidates should leave their religious and political beliefs out of the pageant. Well Mr. Hilton so should you! He asked her because of her being from California and prop 8 he interjected his political beliefs into the pageant.

    I have a uncle-in-law that will answer a direct question honestly and no matter what impact it has.
    I like him but know better then to ask him if he likes me? If I ask you a question I than have to respect your opinion. I may try to explain why I think your opinion is wrong. But I am not entitled to call you names and make fun of your body and mind.

    The pictures are Mittel Nichts, to be held against her by a pageant where she is require to walk around in a Bikini that is less covering of her butt then the panties she was wearing in the pictures is ridicules. Did you know that under that Bikini top she had her boobs hanging out! You see exactly what you see either covered by the top or her arms. It not like Rose-ann Bar in a teddy now that WAS obscene!

    I do not oppose Gay marriage because of logical reasons, I do think Hilton is anti-gay for his question and his reactions. Reason is winning out it would seem but reacting like some winy sissy boy sets the reasoning back. He did more damage to his cause then she did with her answer.

  28. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

    “writerdog
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:15 pm | Permalink
    …He did more damage to his cause then she did with her answer.”

    That is a good point. It was silly of him to ask that question. There is a place and a time for everything, and a beauty pagent is not the place for a ‘judge’ to make a moral implication.

  29. ANTI
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:22 pm | Permalink

    (go away Anti – making sign of cross with hands)
    ======================================

    Won’t do any good.

    You need one bear or 2 cougars(the big cats) to repel the ANTI.

  30. RFL
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

    Sure thing Brian. Anticipate all you want. It seems though, that your anticipations are based upon you own base desires not on facts regarding the woman you are speaking of.

  31. fleettwood
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    Will Prejean continue to be a heroine of the religious right?
    ___________________________________________

    As I am not religious, I don’t know the answer, but she’s hot enough it doesn’t matter.
    Signed,
    Pig

  32. Regular
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:31 pm | Permalink

    #
    brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:08 pm | Permalink

    “Regular
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:02 pm | Permalink
    …Brian Nuevo claims to be an independent, but is one of the first to attack others with snide, crude remarks. One can’t even make a comment on a story without Brian attacking another poster.”

    ouch. you are bitter now aren’t you? I burned you good!
    =======================
    No, you burn yourself and your reputation. I make a comment about Perez Hilton, a vile human being who attacks others and you make a comment towards me.

    See the difference? I was making a comment on something in the news, you choose to attack other posters.

    You are a contemptible leftist lib, (attack, attack, attack)

  33. American_Way
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

    If a porn star can be elected to congress, just imagine what this little honey can do:

    Stormy Daniels strode onstage at a downtown Baton Rouge restaurant in a tight black blouse with a plunging neckline and a knee-length skirt in the popular purple of Louisiana State University. She introduced herself with a warning.

    “For those of you who don’t know who I am,” she told the lunch crowd at The Roux House, “I’d suggest that you don’t Google that until you get home from work.”

    She’s a Louisiana-born porn star who says she is considering a 2010 run for the U.S. Senate seat currently held by Republican David Vitter.” Fox news

    We’ve had a peanut farmer prez
    A movie star,
    a dope smoker
    an idiot
    and now a cocaine snorter

    What’s wrong with a beauty pageant queen?

  34. mrcontroversy
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:38 pm | Permalink

    Behavior is learned.
    You CONs taught us well.

  35. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:38 pm | Permalink

    “Regular
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:31 pm | Permalink
    …I was making a comment on something in the news, you choose to attack other posters.

    You are a contemptible leftist lib, (attack, attack, attack)”

    Hypocrite, thy name is Regular

  36. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:39 pm | Permalink

    What’s wrong, you can dish it out but can’t take it?

  37. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:41 pm | Permalink

    “ANTI
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:22 pm | Permalink
    …or 2 cougars(the big cats)”
    LMAO!
    What, the other kind don’t work?

  38. ANTI
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:43 pm | Permalink

    LMAO!
    What, the other kind don’t work?
    ==================================

    They act as more of an attractant.

  39. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:43 pm | Permalink

    “American_Way
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:37 pm | Permalink
    …What’s wrong with a beauty pageant queen?”

    Well, nothing. Palin was one herself.

    It is not the fact that they are (or were) pageant contestants that will be the problem.

    I would have no problem voting for a candidate who had been a ‘beauty pageant queen’ if her views jived with mine.

  40. Boxlock20
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:44 pm | Permalink

    I think she’s great!
    I would think so even without the silicone breasts, if that is even true. They weren’t necessary.

  41. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:44 pm | Permalink

    “ANTI
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:43 pm | Permalink
    LMAO!
    What, the other kind don’t work?
    ==================================

    They act as more of an attractant”

    There may still be ‘big cats’ involved…

  42. ANTI
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:46 pm | Permalink

    ANTI sings…

    Cat scratch fever…

    (Shout out to the Jay man…my singing is better than yours.)

  43. American_Way
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:52 pm | Permalink

    “Won’t do any good. You need one bear or 2 cougars(the big cats) to repel the ANTI.”

    Next typo, I trying a silver bullet.

  44. American_Way
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:53 pm | Permalink

    I’m
    I’m
    I’m
    I’m
    I’m
    I’m

    TOO LATE!!

  45. ANTI
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:54 pm | Permalink

    Next typo, I trying a silver bullet.
    ———————————

    I dno’t thik you can out tpyo me…eever.

  46. Phantom
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:55 pm | Permalink

    Maybe she could join palin’s daughter and get paid to go around promoting abstinence, or would she have to have a baby out of wedlock to know what she’s talking about?

  47. Regular
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:59 pm | Permalink

    #
    brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 1:39 pm | Permalink

    What’s wrong, you can dish it out but can’t take it?
    ———————-
    You just dont’ get it do you?

    I made a comment about a guy in the news, Perez Hilton.

    The low life that you are, you attack me.

    If you want me to attack you without provocation just let me know, I’ll make it my life’s ambition.

  48. American_Way
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 2:09 pm | Permalink

    “Maybe she could join palin’s daughter”

    Phantom who better to promote abstinence than a young mother who has been there done that?

    Someone well known and in the news. Not a saint. But a young teenage girl who’s boyfriend love later left her?

    Abstinence is 100% effective as a birth control. Why not try that? If that fails – tell them about the birth control pill and by golly get them some.

    But don’t make snarky remarks of someone trying to get the message out to other young people.

    If she was the daughter of a democrat she’d be a national hero.

  49. American_Way
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 2:13 pm | Permalink

    “I would have no problem voting for a candidate who had been a ‘beauty pageant queen’ if her views jived with mine.”

    Awwww come on Brian! If this lady was the democratic candidate for Prez – I’D VOTE FOR HER!!!

    Looks count. Just remember the polls of women voters and Bill Clinton.

  50. KSGolfnut
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

    This is (once again) typical of the libs – and Brownlee is a quintessential lib.

    When you have no argument against the message – attack the individual.

  51. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 2:17 pm | Permalink

    “American_Way
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 2:13 pm | Permalink
    …If this lady was the democratic candidate for Prez – I’D VOTE FOR HER!!!”

    I am saving this statement…just in case :)

  52. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 2:22 pm | Permalink

    “KSGolfnut
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 2:16 pm | Permalink
    This is (once again) typical of the libs – and Brownlee is a quintessential lib.

    When you have no argument against the message – attack the individual.”

    I hope you do not think that tactic is solely used by ‘libs’.
    Anyone could easily dredge up scores of examples of ‘cons’ doing the exact same thing….

  53. gster
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 2:37 pm | Permalink

    “Anyone could easily dredge up scores of examples of ‘cons’ doing the exact same thing….”

    BN- That’s the definition of a “con job”.

    ??

  54. Maggotpunk
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 2:41 pm | Permalink

    I don’t know why the conservatives would be upset, they are known for being obsessed with porn. They are probably upset because there isn’t some sex tape they can view.

    As for Christians it shouldn’t bother them. Noah ran around drunk and naked, and he was considered the most holy man on Earth. The next guy to be that holy threw his daughters out to a mob to be raped. Posing topless is mild in comparison.

  55. Monkeyhawk
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 2:44 pm | Permalink

    Go back to the videotape.

    It was just her answer was anti gender-neutral message, it’s how stupid she was.

    “I think it’s great people have the choice….”

    Huh?

    “In MY country, marriage is….”

    C’mon, CONs.

    If Carrie Perjean regularly contributed to WE Blog, the other CONs would whimper away with their tails between their legs even more often than they do already.

    And here we have another bleach blonde trying to play the victim card, a la Ann Coulter.

    It wasn’t the wrong answer, it was a stupid answer.

    Which, of course, CONs rally around.

  56. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 2:51 pm | Permalink

    “Monkeyhawk
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 2:44 pm”

    You should take it in context though…it was a beauty pagent, not Jeopardy.

    It was a setup question, and any answer given would have sounded stupid.

    Really the best answer IMHO would have been for her to tell Hilton that that question was not appropriate for the Miss America Pageant and refuse to answer it. She would have gotten the same score from him, not put down her personal values, and not offend gay marriage supporters. She could have explained her views on Good Morning America and Hannity the next day and been respected by both sides for not falling into Hilton’s trap of politizing the pageant. (hindsight is always 20/20 isn’t it)

  57. Regular
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 2:53 pm | Permalink

    Perez Hiltion will soon be gone anyway, as it’s reported that make up can only cover up so many Kaposis Sarcoma lesions.

  58. ANTI
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 2:55 pm | Permalink

    I am happy that she didn’t tip-toe around the issue.

    If people are offended, so what?

    Get a helmet.

  59. Mr_Kia
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 2:59 pm | Permalink

    Regular
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 2:53 pm | Permalink
    Perez Hiltion will soon be gone anyway, as it’s reported that make up can only cover up so many Kaposis Sarcoma lesions.
    —————————————————-
    Post of the year.
    I’m hoping as well it is truth and not a joke.

  60. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    That is some compassionate conservatism right there folks!

  61. ANTI
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    Brian,

    I think it was a Lib that started the insults and vile nastiness.

    If that prissy Perez can’t take the blow back, he shouldn’t light sticks of dynamite.

  62. Monkeyhawk
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    According to pageant officials, those questions are to judge a contestant’s poise.

    If you’re gonna be Miss America, they can count on you getting some provocative questions along the way.

    “Can you think on your feet?”

    “Can you not look stupid when answering an unexpected question?”

    Poor li’l Carrie Prejean obviously would have preferred a question about the proper application of mascara. That’s pretty much her universe.

    Or, “How long does it hurt after they put plastic bags in your boobs?” She could then speak from experience.

    And then she plays the “victim” because she gave a rambling stupid-sounding answer to a question addressing the issues of the day.

    And then the NOM hired her as a spokes-bimbo. And later discovered Carrie was perfectly willing to go bare-ass for anyone with money.

    Yeah. That’s your “family values” for ya.

  63. Mr_Kia
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:19 pm | Permalink

    I’m not so sure what is so “rambling and stupid sounding” about this?
    It sounds alot like every answer given during these ridiculous competitions (my opinion.).
    Fact remains those who scream the loudest about “inclusion” are the one’s who scream the loudest to silence differing opinions.

    “Well I think it’s great that Americans are able to choose one way or the other. We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage. You know what, in my country, in my family, I do believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman, no offense to anybody out there. But that’s how I was raised and I believe that it should be between a man and a woman.”

  64. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:19 pm | Permalink

    Anti,
    I am not defending Perez, he got what was coming to him on this one.

    However, if conservatives are willing to let go of their ‘compassionate conservative’ morals because ‘a Lib .. started the insults and vile nastiness’ than it seems the idea of compassionate conservatism or standing up for Christian values doesn’t go very deep.

  65. ANTI
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:21 pm | Permalink

    I never claimed to be compassionate, Brian.

  66. Mr_Kia
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:22 pm | Permalink

    I’d like to add to the party line “Compassionate Conservatism with a Sense of Humor”.

  67. Regular
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:22 pm | Permalink

    Prejean gave a mature, honest answer – it’s the nastiness of the Libs who got their bowels in an uproar over it.

  68. Jed
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    I’m not bothered by her “racy” photos. I’m not even particularly worried about her entering a beauty contest. But she was the one who publicly (and unneccesarily) questioned the morality of others while knowing she didn’t measure up to her own standards. That’s hypocrisy. And unfortunately, that’s pretty standard religious wingnut fare.

  69. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:26 pm | Permalink

    “ANTI
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:21 pm | Permalink
    I never claimed to be compassionate, Brian.”

    We all know you are an ass*ole and not compassionate. :)
    I was not necessarily referring to you.

    Many conservatives claim to be compassionate and have Christian values.

  70. Regular
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:27 pm | Permalink

    #
    Jed
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    I’m not bothered by her “racy” photos. I’m not even particularly worried about her entering a beauty contest. But she was the one who publicly (and unneccesarily) questioned the morality of others while knowing she didn’t measure up to her own standards. That’s hypocrisy. And unfortunately, that’s pretty standard religious wingnut fare.
    —————————————-
    This wasn’t a question about her Jed, it was a question about gay marriage. It was asked, she answered.

    There is nothing, nada, zero, zip hypocritical in that exchange.

  71. ANTI
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:27 pm | Permalink

    We all know you are an ass*ole and not compassionate. :)
    ============================================

    Good, I get tired of correcting you people.
    :D

  72. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

    “brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:30 pm | Permalink
    Your comment is awaiting moderation.
    Anti,
    ever hear this song:
    http://www.lyricsdownload.com/dennis-leary-ass*ole-lyrics.html

    It is great”

    replace the * with an h.

    Stupid moderation.

  73. ANTI
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    Why yes I have Brian, I am quite fond of the song!

  74. Mr_Kia
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    Many conservatives claim to be compassionate and have Christian values.

    I’m Conservative. Compassion is a matter of opinion and political idealogy.
    I believe more compassion is shown by giving one the tools to be self-sufficient vs. keeping them as an indentured servant.
    As far as Christian values goes, I am also a Christian. The basic of that is I am a sinner. So are you. I’m in need of a savior. So are you.
    The difference is Christians seem to recognize this. Those that bash it (at least among this crew) seem to feel morally superior and not in need of salvation.

  75. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    “ANTI
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:33 pm | Permalink
    Why yes I have Brian, I am quite fond of the song!”

    I try to listen to it regularly. The video of his whole routine of which that is a part is hilarious too.

    (I’m off to get some coffee flavored coffee now)

  76. Mr_Kia
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    Jed
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    I’m not bothered by her “racy” photos. I’m not even particularly worried about her entering a beauty contest. But she was the one who publicly (and unneccesarily) questioned the morality of others while knowing she didn’t measure up to her own standards. That’s hypocrisy. And unfortunately, that’s pretty standard religious wingnut fare.
    ————————————————–
    You truly are special.
    Where did she ever question the morality of others? She was asked a question about marriage.
    BTW num nuts, the standards are God’s. Christians know they don’t live up to them.
    Kinda the whole idea.

  77. RFL
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:44 pm | Permalink

    If Christians believed they were perfect, they would not need to establish a relationship with their God.

    Only atheists believe that they are perfect.

  78. Jed
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:45 pm | Permalink

    Kia,
    Aah, the old “we know we’re sinners, but we reserve the right to brand you a sinner to divert attention from our own sins” argument. And you even believe that that absolves you from your own hypocrisy. Wow! Wingnut heaven!

  79. JMWalker
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:47 pm | Permalink

    It’s really quite simple: If she violated the terms of the contract she signed, she loses her crown. How much simpler can it be?

  80. Mr_Kia
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:48 pm | Permalink

    Jed
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:45 pm | Permalink
    Kia,
    Aah, the old “we know we’re sinners, but we reserve the right to brand you a sinner to divert attention from our own sins” argument. And you even believe that that absolves you from your own hypocrisy. Wow! Wingnut heaven!
    —————————————————-
    Haven’t branded anyone anything. Just pointing out the obvious. Myself included.

    RFL’s post has it right.

  81. Jed
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:48 pm | Permalink

    Ruffled,
    “Only atheists believe that they are perfect.”

    Gee, I’ve known a fair number of atheists over the years, and I’ve never once heard one make that claim. Christians however…..

  82. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:50 pm | Permalink

    kinda missin that whole John 8:7 thing…

  83. Mr_Kia
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:50 pm | Permalink

    JMWalker
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:47 pm | Permalink
    It’s really quite simple: If she violated the terms of the contract she signed, she loses her crown. How much simpler can it be?
    —————————————————-
    If that’s all we are talking about she should be thrilled. Kind of like how finishing in 2nd on American Idol is the much better financial deal.
    Don’t have to be indebted to “the man.”
    Take it from her and let her get on with what will likely be a lucrative career, or 15 minutes. Either way she stands to make some coin with that tiarra is off her head.

  84. CJM
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:51 pm | Permalink

    You double-standard hetero-phobes amaze me.

  85. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:53 pm | Permalink

    “Jed
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:48 pm | Permalink
    Ruffled,
    “Only atheists believe that they are perfect.”

    Gee, I’ve known a fair number of atheists over the years, and I’ve never once heard one make that claim”

    I was wondering about that one too. I have never heard an atheist (or a Christian) claim they were perfect.

  86. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:55 pm | Permalink

    “Mr_Kia
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:50 pm | Permalink
    …Either way she stands to make some coin with that tiarra is off her head”

    Once the tiarra and the panties are off. I heard playboy has already contacted her.

  87. ANTI
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:55 pm | Permalink

    I was perfect yesterday, but I messed up this morning.

  88. Regular
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:56 pm | Permalink

    buffon

  89. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:58 pm | Permalink

    “Regular
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:56 pm | Permalink
    buffon”

    OMG that is classic!

  90. Posted May 7, 2009 at 4:39 pm | Permalink

    Well, at least she got comped a nice new set of juggs out of the deal.

    14:54…………….14:55…………..14:56…….

  91. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 4:46 pm | Permalink

    OK I didn’t get this:
    “14:54…………….14:55…………..14:56…….”

    was that supposed to mean something to someone?

  92. ANTI
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 4:48 pm | Permalink

    15 minutes of fame, I believe….It’s almost up.

  93. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 4:53 pm | Permalink

    whooosh
    that went right over my head. Thanks for dumbing it down for me Anti.

  94. ANTI
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 4:54 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for dumbing it down for me Anti.
    ====================================

    Hey,

    I’m always here to help others.

  95. RoaCH
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 5:04 pm | Permalink

    ANTI
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 3:21 pm | Permalink
    I never claimed to be compassionate, Brian.

    =====================================

    WFT? Don’t start throwing french or latin words around. Stick to English! There is no such word
    as “compassionate” in the English language.

    I’ll bet the sucker made it up to sound like a big shot.

  96. brian_nuevo
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 5:20 pm | Permalink

    Like most words in English, compassionate comes from a Latin word. I guess by that token, there really aren’t any ‘English’ words; they all came from some other language.

  97. RoaCH
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 6:06 pm | Permalink

    Hey! When they say she is in hot water – would that maybe indicate it’s a wet tshirt contest?

    OH BOY!!!!

  98. Posted May 7, 2009 at 8:21 pm | Permalink

    Hey! When they say she is in hot water – would that maybe indicate it’s a wet tshirt contest?

    OH BOY!!!!
    =================================================

    Wet T-shirt contests are in accordance with Biblical principles so long as holy water is used.

  99. killerpizza
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 9:37 pm | Permalink

    “Keep those woman home and pregnant”

    funny how that is actually the republican way dumbazzz.

  100. RoaCH
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 9:50 pm | Permalink

    funny how ignorant some posters can be.

  101. JimJohnson
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 10:04 pm | Permalink

    Now if Prejean would have admitted she was a Les bian, Ath eist, Vegeteraian, Tree-hugging, Gun-ha ting, Abortion-supporting, Obama voter, there would be no problem with a couple of skin photos.

  102. JimJohnson
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 10:35 pm | Permalink

    The McClatchy Company is in HOT Water!

    77 cent stock price today!

    http://bands.army.mil/music/bugle/calls/taps.mp3

  103. BlueJay
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 11:09 pm | Permalink

    Dayum! For the right, this must be like a pic of the virgin Mary with a tramp stamp.

  104. totoinks
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 11:19 pm | Permalink

    JimJohnson
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 10:35 pm | Permalink
    The McClatchy Company is in HOT Water!

    77 cent stock price today

    Citibank was at 80 cents a few weeks back – so what’s your point?

  105. totoinks
    Posted May 7, 2009 at 11:26 pm | Permalink

    There was nothing wrong with what Miss California said in her answer to the question about gay marriage but that is not why we are discussing this.

    This woman told the pageant officials there were no nude or semi nude pictures that might have been previously taken and now we know that there is not one but four. So, why not let the pageant officials handle this problem.

    The issue I have a problem with is that this woman is now somehow being made into a victime for the Chhristian Right and FAmily Values group.

    For all you sanctimonius, self-righteous hypocrit Christians who are defending this woman, please get off the cross, someone else needs the wood.

  106. Posted May 7, 2009 at 11:39 pm | Permalink

    The issue I have a problem with is that this woman is now somehow being made into a victime for the Chhristian Right and FAmily Values group.
    ==============================================

    Blasphemy!!!!

    Carrie Prejean is a modern day Joan of Arc.

  107. Heru_Ra_Ha
    Posted May 8, 2009 at 5:03 am | Permalink

    Blasphemy!!!!

    Carrie Prejean is a modern day Joan of Arc.

    ===================

    Thus, she will be condemned to burn at the stake by the very person, on whose behalf, she took to the sword in the first place.

  108. Jed
    Posted May 8, 2009 at 5:05 am | Permalink

    Jimbo,
    “Now if Prejean would have admitted she was a Les bian, Ath eist, Vegeteraian, Tree-hugging, Gun-ha ting, Abortion-supporting, Obama voter, there would be no problem with a couple of skin photos.”

    If she openly admitted all that, I doubt she’d even have wanted to enter the Miss USA pageant. Getting up in front of the world in a swimsuit and pretending to be a ditz would be anathema to a woman with that much going for her!

  109. American_Way
    Posted May 8, 2009 at 7:19 am | Permalink

    If she openly admitted all that, I doubt she’d even have wanted to enter the Miss USA pageant.

    Jed are you saying that homos*xuals and lesb*ans cannot or do not participate in beauty pageants or Mr M*scle events?

    Careful, someone might label you a big*t.

  110. Boxlock20
    Posted May 8, 2009 at 8:19 am | Permalink

    “The McClatchy Company is in HOT Water!
    77 cent stock price today”

    “Citibank was at 80 cents a few weeks back – so what’s your point?”

    Humor!!! You can buy the stock certificate paper for less than the actual ‘rag’ on the newsstand.
    Funny….but sad.
    I wonder if it would help if newspapers got back to objectively reporting the news, and took professional pride in that very noble and necessary function, instead of trying to influence and promote their political and other agendas.
    That’s why I dropped them.

  111. outlander
    Posted May 8, 2009 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    Well, here it is. The shocking photo that supposedly proves what an immoral person Carrie Prejean is and why she has no right to speak out on the yag marriage issue.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/07/miss-california-topless-p_n_198798.html

    Jeesh.

  112. Jed
    Posted May 9, 2009 at 5:08 pm | Permalink

    Amway,
    “Jed are you saying that homos*xuals and lesb*ans cannot or do not participate in beauty pageants or Mr M*scle events?”

    Uh, no, that isn’t what I said. Try reading posts first before you try to twist them. It helps. And watch out for that sneaky asterisk key.

  113. Jed
    Posted May 9, 2009 at 5:27 pm | Permalink

    Outie,
    As I said earlier, the photo isn’t a particular problem. It’s hardly even a photo.
    But she did use the pageant as a forum for her political agenda, and pageant officials (letches that they are) have the right to boot her out for that or any other reason they choose, including getting her tits inflated or tramp-stamp airbrushed out or preaching about her morality on company time. Personally, I don’t care what they do since I’m not planning on watching it. Think I’ll watch “Religulous” instead, see if that’s any good.

  114. WSClark
    Posted May 9, 2009 at 5:51 pm | Permalink

    The real question is not that she might lose her Miss California title, it’s whether they will reprocess her boobs?

    Repo Man, anyone?

  115. WSClark
    Posted May 9, 2009 at 5:53 pm | Permalink

    Reprocess = repossess