Daily Archives: May 18, 2009

Notre Dame students modeled civility

Obama Notre DamePresident Obama told University of Notre Dame graduates Sunday that he was inspired by their maturity and responsibility in dealing with the controversy surrounding his giving the school’s commencement address. Too bad more national groups and commentators — both pro-choice and pro-life — don’t always model the same behaviors.
Obama, who was welcomed by the students with loud cheers and respectful applause, spoke about the need to find common ground and to extend the presumption of good faith to others. He called for open hearts, open minds and fair-minded words. And though  he acknowledged that some viewpoints about abortion are irreconcilable, differing sides should be able to make their cases with passion and conviction but without “reducing those with differing views to caricature.” As Obama told the students — and everyone should  heed — “religion and conviction can co-exist with friendship, civility, hospitality, and especially love.”

Pro-con on hate-crimes law

hatecrimeAfter years of unconscionable delay, the House has approved legislation that would, for the first time, extend federal hate-crimes law to give substantive coverage to gay people. The act would be an important step forward in protecting all minorities from violence and a tribute to a young man whose life was cut short by bigotry. The Matthew Shepard Act, as the bill is known in the Senate, would provide increased funding to state and local authorities to prosecute a wide range of hate crimes — ones motivated by race, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability. It would also authorize the federal government to prosecute these crimes when states fail to do so. The biggest beneficiaries would probably be African-Americans, who make up the largest group of hate-crime victims. It would also help Hispanics, who have been increasing targets of anti-immigrant hatred. The bill’s opponents have focused on the protection of gay people, who were the victims in more than 16 percent of the hate crimes reported by the FBI in 2007. In addition to providing more resources, the act would serve an important public education role, underscoring the seriousness and horror of these crimes. After the House’s strong vote — 249 to 175 — in favor of the bill, the Senate needs to follow. — New York Times editorial

The bill targets actions we would all like to eliminate — physically injuring or trying to injure someone with “fire, a firearm, a dangerous weapon, or an explosive or incendiary device.” But it’s hard to imagine that it would reduce the prevalence of such conduct, which is already 1) really, really illegal and 2) subject to harsh penalties. This legislation would add extra punishment for attacks designated as hate crimes. But if a criminal is not deterred by the fear of five years behind bars, he’s probably not going to be pushed onto the straight and narrow by the prospect of six. The proposed federal law is mostly a curiosity, since it applies only to hate crimes in which the attacker singles out a victim on the basis of race, religion or national origin and is trying to interfere with the victim’s participation in one of six federally protected activities — going to a public school, applying for a job, serving as a grand juror and so on. Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., wants to eliminate these restrictions because they make it hard for the feds to go after hate crimes. But the change might not go down well at the Supreme Court. So a federal hate crimes law may go from being a ban on extremely rare offenses to being unconstitutional. Some achievement. If federal licensing laws required disclosure of the ingredients in congressional legislation, here’s what the label on this one would say: 90 grams of empty symbolism and 10 grams of needless duplication. — Steve Chapman, Chicago Tribune columnist

Open thread 5/18

thescream6

No welfare for terrorists, Tiahrt says

tiahrtnewmug19Saying he was motivated by a suggestion by National Intelligence Director Dennis C. Blair that released Chinese detainees receive public assistance, Rep. Todd Tiahrt, R-Goddard, explained his No Welfare for Terrorists Act of 2009 in a Friday commentary for the Washington Times. A sample: “Instead of keeping remorseless terrorists at the Guantanamo Bay terrorist detention facility away from our children and our families, the Obama administration is suggesting a welcome mat for terrorists paid for by you and me. Based on what we know from previously released detainees, such men do not want a new life here in America. They want death and destruction for our country and are eager to help make that happen.”

Democrats tout successes

donkeykick6Though their numbers aren’t large, Democrats in the Kansas Legislature had a productive session this year, their leaders contend. Among the achievements cited were raising the state minimum wage, limiting cuts to public education, expanding unemployment benefits, and preventing pay cuts and furloughs for state employees. “By forming bipartisan coalitions within the House and Senate on multiple occasions throughout the session,” said House Minority Leader Paul Davis of Lawrence, “we were able to pass legislation that was important to both sides of the aisle — and to Kansans in need.”