<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would Secretary Sebelius have a conflict of interest?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:57:13 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-562151</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 04:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-562151</guid>
		<description>Phant,
Yeah, I&#039;m glad for her, but I can&#039;t get over the feeling of somehow being abandoned to the state&#039;s resident pack of jackals when she resigns as governor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phant,<br />
Yeah, I&#8217;m glad for her, but I can&#8217;t get over the feeling of somehow being abandoned to the state&#8217;s resident pack of jackals when she resigns as governor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phantom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-562120</link>
		<dc:creator>Phantom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-562120</guid>
		<description>Conflict or no, tomorrow she gets her confirmation votes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conflict or no, tomorrow she gets her confirmation votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: parkay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561930</link>
		<dc:creator>parkay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561930</guid>
		<description>The abortions being committed in Kansas are not safe or legal or rare, especially the high-risk post-viable ones banned in state law, increasing at a disturbing rate in the last couple of years.
Bilious Sebelius has not only encouraged this horrible trend by vetoing cleanliness and safety legislation and post-viable loophole closures,  and by discouraging enforcement of state abortion mill laws, but she is also attempting to cover up the &quot;contributions&quot; her campaigns have collected directly from abortionist quacks and abortion mills, and from their political PACs.
Sebelius is unfit for any federal office, as well as for governor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The abortions being committed in Kansas are not safe or legal or rare, especially the high-risk post-viable ones banned in state law, increasing at a disturbing rate in the last couple of years.<br />
Bilious Sebelius has not only encouraged this horrible trend by vetoing cleanliness and safety legislation and post-viable loophole closures,  and by discouraging enforcement of state abortion mill laws, but she is also attempting to cover up the &#8220;contributions&#8221; her campaigns have collected directly from abortionist quacks and abortion mills, and from their political PACs.<br />
Sebelius is unfit for any federal office, as well as for governor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monkeyhawk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561583</link>
		<dc:creator>Monkeyhawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561583</guid>
		<description>&quot;DFB&quot; --

For starters, &quot;irregardless&quot; is not a legitimate word.  

Using it just makes you look dumb(er).  

Seems to me, if a 12-year-old isn&#039;t competent to make a decision about her own body, she might not be good mother material.

I knew a young woman who got pregnant and considered her choices to be abortion or suicide.  I suspect she was wrong, but her relationship with her father was such she was sure he would disown her, stop paying for her education, and force her into single parenthood.

I suspect she might have been wrong.  Parents tend to come through in a crisis.  But nothing could change the young woman&#039;s mindset.  

As a third party observer, I have no objection to her decision to end the pregnancy.  We keep in touch from time to time and the issue still weighs on her mind.  

Thing is: I think there&#039;s a difference between a fertilized egg and a walking, talking, thinking human being.  You don&#039;t.  

I tend to be more interested in the post-born.  You don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;DFB&#8221; &#8211;</p>
<p>For starters, &#8220;irregardless&#8221; is not a legitimate word.  </p>
<p>Using it just makes you look dumb(er).  </p>
<p>Seems to me, if a 12-year-old isn&#8217;t competent to make a decision about her own body, she might not be good mother material.</p>
<p>I knew a young woman who got pregnant and considered her choices to be abortion or suicide.  I suspect she was wrong, but her relationship with her father was such she was sure he would disown her, stop paying for her education, and force her into single parenthood.</p>
<p>I suspect she might have been wrong.  Parents tend to come through in a crisis.  But nothing could change the young woman&#8217;s mindset.  </p>
<p>As a third party observer, I have no objection to her decision to end the pregnancy.  We keep in touch from time to time and the issue still weighs on her mind.  </p>
<p>Thing is: I think there&#8217;s a difference between a fertilized egg and a walking, talking, thinking human being.  You don&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>I tend to be more interested in the post-born.  You don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DFB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561569</link>
		<dc:creator>DFB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561569</guid>
		<description>Yep, PM, you&#039;re right, you&#039;re always right, will always be right.  All parent&#039;s are scumbag pervs or drunks who need to have their children taken by some self-righteous person such as yourself so they can be properly trained..er..I mean raised.  Geez..yeah, I get it, there are bad parents and bad kids...got it.  Of course you try to paint the picture with your taint colored glasses, that every parent&#039;s horrible and all kids should have abortions ASAP, while trying to make silly claims that I&#039;m suggesting there no such thing as bad parents...you can stop that lame angle you call an &quot;argument&quot;.  Let me type as slowly as I can for you, Jed, Chas, MH, and the rest of the &quot;pros&quot;.....if a parent is required to give consent for a CHILD to go on a fieldtrip at school, they DAMN sure should be involved in a decision to have an abortion....IRREGARDLESS OF THE DECISION (for like the 5th time!).  Babies making babies doesn&#039;t justify babies killing babies on their own, just because Mom &amp; Dad weren&#039;t around for the opening act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, PM, you&#8217;re right, you&#8217;re always right, will always be right.  All parent&#8217;s are scumbag pervs or drunks who need to have their children taken by some self-righteous person such as yourself so they can be properly trained..er..I mean raised.  Geez..yeah, I get it, there are bad parents and bad kids&#8230;got it.  Of course you try to paint the picture with your taint colored glasses, that every parent&#8217;s horrible and all kids should have abortions ASAP, while trying to make silly claims that I&#8217;m suggesting there no such thing as bad parents&#8230;you can stop that lame angle you call an &#8220;argument&#8221;.  Let me type as slowly as I can for you, Jed, Chas, MH, and the rest of the &#8220;pros&#8221;&#8230;..if a parent is required to give consent for a CHILD to go on a fieldtrip at school, they DAMN sure should be involved in a decision to have an abortion&#8230;.IRREGARDLESS OF THE DECISION (for like the 5th time!).  Babies making babies doesn&#8217;t justify babies killing babies on their own, just because Mom &amp; Dad weren&#8217;t around for the opening act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561455</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561455</guid>
		<description>Linda,
&quot;Kathleen Sebelius will work hard as Secretary of Health and Human Services. She has experience in what does and doesn’t work in the insurance field and she’s a smart lady.&quot;

Our only real chance for a workable healthcare system is to hope that she knows enough about what doesn&#039;t work in the insurance field to avoid the industry altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linda,<br />
&#8220;Kathleen Sebelius will work hard as Secretary of Health and Human Services. She has experience in what does and doesn’t work in the insurance field and she’s a smart lady.&#8221;</p>
<p>Our only real chance for a workable healthcare system is to hope that she knows enough about what doesn&#8217;t work in the insurance field to avoid the industry altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political_mama</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561418</link>
		<dc:creator>Political_mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561418</guid>
		<description>The issue of foster care- look at how many babies and small children have been murdered in Wichita alone?  Do you think one day out of the blue these people abused their children?  Possibly, but chances are that the abuse was ongoing.

I had a friend who worked for SRS who said that she was discouraged from taking kids whose parents were so hopeless that they&#039;d be in the system forever.  They prefer to take kids they think they can really help.

I&#039;m sick of the state always being a big bad entity that just wants to take kids away from fantastic parents.  I know a little about it, because I was taken by my parents, who were good parents but I was a runaway and my parents went to them asking for help.  At the time, their only option was to sign me over to the state- and then the state really dropped the ball, but at least I was safe.

They closed Prairie View to juveniles...why?  Parents who want inpatient treatment for their kids cannot get it.  WTH?  What is going on that parents screaming for help with their kids can&#039;t get any especially around Wichita?

Why?  They&#039;re overwhelmed with parents who could care less and those kids are the ones who will end up housed in prison.  But instead of it just being them in prison, its going to also be the ones whose parents had no place to turn for help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue of foster care- look at how many babies and small children have been murdered in Wichita alone?  Do you think one day out of the blue these people abused their children?  Possibly, but chances are that the abuse was ongoing.</p>
<p>I had a friend who worked for SRS who said that she was discouraged from taking kids whose parents were so hopeless that they&#8217;d be in the system forever.  They prefer to take kids they think they can really help.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sick of the state always being a big bad entity that just wants to take kids away from fantastic parents.  I know a little about it, because I was taken by my parents, who were good parents but I was a runaway and my parents went to them asking for help.  At the time, their only option was to sign me over to the state- and then the state really dropped the ball, but at least I was safe.</p>
<p>They closed Prairie View to juveniles&#8230;why?  Parents who want inpatient treatment for their kids cannot get it.  WTH?  What is going on that parents screaming for help with their kids can&#8217;t get any especially around Wichita?</p>
<p>Why?  They&#8217;re overwhelmed with parents who could care less and those kids are the ones who will end up housed in prison.  But instead of it just being them in prison, its going to also be the ones whose parents had no place to turn for help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lindainks55</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561402</link>
		<dc:creator>lindainks55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561402</guid>
		<description>All day long everyone made their points, no one budged in their opinions.  

Kathleen Sebelius will work hard as Secretary of Health and Human Services.  She has experience in what does and doesn&#039;t work in the insurance field and she&#039;s a smart lady.

If agreement on health care reform isn&#039;t reached by October 15th, the Democrats have already decided to attach it to the budget reconciliation bill.  According to Senate rules, budget resolutions and reconciliation bills are subject to straight up-or-down votes. Filibusters are not allowed.

We&#039;ll have health care reform and enough years to tweak it, work out the kinks,  make it better and improved.  Everyone will benefit, including all those who will scream about &#039;socialized&#039; medicine.

Oh, btw, abortion will remain legal and safe.  With a lot of hard work, due diligence and dignity for all women, we can also make abortion rare, the last option, always a private matter between a woman her doctor and her God.  We can educate and protect future generations of females and work toward eliminating unwanted pregnancies.  It will happen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All day long everyone made their points, no one budged in their opinions.  </p>
<p>Kathleen Sebelius will work hard as Secretary of Health and Human Services.  She has experience in what does and doesn&#8217;t work in the insurance field and she&#8217;s a smart lady.</p>
<p>If agreement on health care reform isn&#8217;t reached by October 15th, the Democrats have already decided to attach it to the budget reconciliation bill.  According to Senate rules, budget resolutions and reconciliation bills are subject to straight up-or-down votes. Filibusters are not allowed.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll have health care reform and enough years to tweak it, work out the kinks,  make it better and improved.  Everyone will benefit, including all those who will scream about &#8217;socialized&#8217; medicine.</p>
<p>Oh, btw, abortion will remain legal and safe.  With a lot of hard work, due diligence and dignity for all women, we can also make abortion rare, the last option, always a private matter between a woman her doctor and her God.  We can educate and protect future generations of females and work toward eliminating unwanted pregnancies.  It will happen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sadie12</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561395</link>
		<dc:creator>sadie12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561395</guid>
		<description>Politcal Mom, As a sucessful parent with grandchildren who has come up agains the corruption here and won.  I do know of which I speak.  There are no rose colored glasses.  I have been to Topeka I have talked to numerous Senators and Representatives.  I do know that there are problems.  So does the Governor.  She has been told.  Many children are abused in the foster care system and it is handled internally.  &quot;You are right
the problems are bigger here that you ever imagined.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politcal Mom, As a sucessful parent with grandchildren who has come up agains the corruption here and won.  I do know of which I speak.  There are no rose colored glasses.  I have been to Topeka I have talked to numerous Senators and Representatives.  I do know that there are problems.  So does the Governor.  She has been told.  Many children are abused in the foster care system and it is handled internally.  &#8220;You are right<br />
the problems are bigger here that you ever imagined.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561392</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561392</guid>
		<description>P-Mom,
Actually it depends somewhat on whether this week&#039;s abuse was committed by a natural or foster parent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P-Mom,<br />
Actually it depends somewhat on whether this week&#8217;s abuse was committed by a natural or foster parent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political_mama</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561384</link>
		<dc:creator>Political_mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561384</guid>
		<description>Sadie, its always a small problem until it happens to you.  Believe it or not, I think the problems are bigger than you and rose colored glasses DFB think they are.

The state should be taking MORE kids away.  If you ask me, if they take your kids they have a darn good reason to do so because it takes a LOT to take someone&#039;s kids anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadie, its always a small problem until it happens to you.  Believe it or not, I think the problems are bigger than you and rose colored glasses DFB think they are.</p>
<p>The state should be taking MORE kids away.  If you ask me, if they take your kids they have a darn good reason to do so because it takes a LOT to take someone&#8217;s kids anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561372</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561372</guid>
		<description>sadie,
I hate to tell you, but most of what you complained about are things that were done to fix even worse problems. I&#039;m sorry the world isn&#039;t a perfect place, but we seem to be stuck with it. We&#039;ve managed somehow to get by with it so far, and probably will for a while longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sadie,<br />
I hate to tell you, but most of what you complained about are things that were done to fix even worse problems. I&#8217;m sorry the world isn&#8217;t a perfect place, but we seem to be stuck with it. We&#8217;ve managed somehow to get by with it so far, and probably will for a while longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sadie12</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561359</link>
		<dc:creator>sadie12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561359</guid>
		<description>Everyone here seems to be hung up on pervert fathers. Granted there are sad circumstances out there but... How often?  Where are the numbers for 
aborted babies being from incest?  How about babies
aborted for convience sake? Of course you will never know the real stories as they are confidential. As far as children in the system.  If Sedgwick County and Kansas were not so corrupt in their illegal taking of children direct violations of the law and the statutes with Juvenile Court rubber stamping things perhaps there would not be so many children in the system.  Parents have a right to parent their children and know about their 13 or 14 year old daughter being pregnant.  Get real how many 16 year old boys are in jail for getting their 14 year old girlfreind pregnant?  The state does not make good decisions for children....You can debate abortion all you want but the bottom line is if you break the law you should not be HHS.  And the 16 year olds are labeled Sex Offenders for the rest of their life.  I There are alot of sick things in our society. How many girls in the foster care system are abused after being taken into the system  and then taken for an abortion. Or yet again having their babies also taken into the foster care system?  Again Confidential....The powers that be know about these issues.  THEY HAVE BEEN TOLD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone here seems to be hung up on pervert fathers. Granted there are sad circumstances out there but&#8230; How often?  Where are the numbers for<br />
aborted babies being from incest?  How about babies<br />
aborted for convience sake? Of course you will never know the real stories as they are confidential. As far as children in the system.  If Sedgwick County and Kansas were not so corrupt in their illegal taking of children direct violations of the law and the statutes with Juvenile Court rubber stamping things perhaps there would not be so many children in the system.  Parents have a right to parent their children and know about their 13 or 14 year old daughter being pregnant.  Get real how many 16 year old boys are in jail for getting their 14 year old girlfreind pregnant?  The state does not make good decisions for children&#8230;.You can debate abortion all you want but the bottom line is if you break the law you should not be HHS.  And the 16 year olds are labeled Sex Offenders for the rest of their life.  I There are alot of sick things in our society. How many girls in the foster care system are abused after being taken into the system  and then taken for an abortion. Or yet again having their babies also taken into the foster care system?  Again Confidential&#8230;.The powers that be know about these issues.  THEY HAVE BEEN TOLD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedant</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561356</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561356</guid>
		<description>One more comment, re: the Washington Times a.k.a. the newspaper for those who are conservative not by choice, but by knee-jerk reaction (a males-only club).  From wiki:

&lt;i&gt;Conservative-turned-liberal writer David Brock, who worked for the Times&#039; sister publication Insight on the News, said in his book Blinded by the Right that the news writers at the Times were encouraged and rewarded for giving news stories a conservative slant. In Right-Wing Media and How It Corrupts Democracy, Brock wrote&lt;b&gt; &quot;the Washington Times was governed by a calculatedly unfair political bias and that its journalistic ethics were close to nil.&quot;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

No doubt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more comment, re: the Washington Times a.k.a. the newspaper for those who are conservative not by choice, but by knee-jerk reaction (a males-only club).  From wiki:</p>
<p><i>Conservative-turned-liberal writer David Brock, who worked for the Times&#8217; sister publication Insight on the News, said in his book Blinded by the Right that the news writers at the Times were encouraged and rewarded for giving news stories a conservative slant. In Right-Wing Media and How It Corrupts Democracy, Brock wrote<b> &#8220;the Washington Times was governed by a calculatedly unfair political bias and that its journalistic ethics were close to nil.&#8221;</b></i></p>
<p>No doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monkeyhawk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561354</link>
		<dc:creator>Monkeyhawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561354</guid>
		<description>&quot;Chas&quot; --

I&#039;ve presented many questions to the advocates of illegal abortion they&#039;ve twisted and squirmed away from answering.  

Yeah, every 12-year-old girl should be a virgin and every baby should be planned and wanted.  

But CONs love to compartmentalize their prejudices and resent having to face the natural consequences of their ideologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Chas&#8221; &#8211;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve presented many questions to the advocates of illegal abortion they&#8217;ve twisted and squirmed away from answering.  </p>
<p>Yeah, every 12-year-old girl should be a virgin and every baby should be planned and wanted.  </p>
<p>But CONs love to compartmentalize their prejudices and resent having to face the natural consequences of their ideologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedant</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561353</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561353</guid>
		<description>“If she were the cat’s-paw of any other industry, Mrs. Sebelius would be in trouble. Yet she appears to be sailing toward a sure confirmation, thanks in part to the support of Republican Sen. Sam Brownback, a fellow Kansan and one-time pro-life leader. The industry is good to its friends, the way Standard Oil and Big Sugar once were. And it intimidates those it doesn’t buy.”
---

Cat&#039;s paw and Big Sugar: reasons #5,684,259,884,236 and 5,684,259,884,237 that the GOP has been relegated to Alabama and Salt Lake. 

And although it&#039;s a ridiculous question and answering it raises it to a level  of respectability it does not desesrve, no.  HHS Secretary Sebelius will not have a conflict of interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“If she were the cat’s-paw of any other industry, Mrs. Sebelius would be in trouble. Yet she appears to be sailing toward a sure confirmation, thanks in part to the support of Republican Sen. Sam Brownback, a fellow Kansan and one-time pro-life leader. The industry is good to its friends, the way Standard Oil and Big Sugar once were. And it intimidates those it doesn’t buy.”<br />
&#8212;</p>
<p>Cat&#8217;s paw and Big Sugar: reasons #5,684,259,884,236 and 5,684,259,884,237 that the GOP has been relegated to Alabama and Salt Lake. </p>
<p>And although it&#8217;s a ridiculous question and answering it raises it to a level  of respectability it does not desesrve, no.  HHS Secretary Sebelius will not have a conflict of interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561339</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561339</guid>
		<description>Jed...  unfortunately,  how  right you  are!!  Laws  do  need  some  re-arranging  on  procedures in  such  cases...  I  have  worked on  a  few  task  forces  in  that  area  over  the  years...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jed&#8230;  unfortunately,  how  right you  are!!  Laws  do  need  some  re-arranging  on  procedures in  such  cases&#8230;  I  have  worked on  a  few  task  forces  in  that  area  over  the  years&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561329</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561329</guid>
		<description>Chas,
That&#039;s what should happen. It isn&#039;t often what does happen. It&#039;s very difficult to turn in a parent who holds all the cards. Sometimes when a girl tries, she&#039;s sent back home by authorities who just don&#039;t give a damn. Sometimes the authority the girl picks is her minister who tells her to go home and &quot;Honor Thy Father.&quot; Many times, she&#039;s just too terrorized to report anything at all. The most important thing to remember is that nothing, ever, is a simple as it looks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chas,<br />
That&#8217;s what should happen. It isn&#8217;t often what does happen. It&#8217;s very difficult to turn in a parent who holds all the cards. Sometimes when a girl tries, she&#8217;s sent back home by authorities who just don&#8217;t give a damn. Sometimes the authority the girl picks is her minister who tells her to go home and &#8220;Honor Thy Father.&#8221; Many times, she&#8217;s just too terrorized to report anything at all. The most important thing to remember is that nothing, ever, is a simple as it looks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political_mama</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561327</link>
		<dc:creator>Political_mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561327</guid>
		<description>I did&#039;nt say keep the child in the situation.  But handing her a baby and saying good luck, actually makes it worse for her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did&#8217;nt say keep the child in the situation.  But handing her a baby and saying good luck, actually makes it worse for her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561321</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561321</guid>
		<description>HUD....

&quot;That girl should get herself to PP, or SRS, and REPORT being pregnant by perv Daddy…. Get perv Daddy off the streets and out of her bed… where he belongs…&quot;  [upthread]

THIS  is  what  should  happen....   Normally,  perv Daddy  will  end up  behind  bars,  and  the  child(and siblings if any)  in  foster  care...  Try  checking  with  SRS  with  a hypothetical  situation,  and  ask  what  they  would  do....  

As  ws  mentioned  WAY  upthread,  the  liklihood  of  the  child  having  an  abortion that  costs  a  lot of  $$$  is  minimal...  More  likely,  the  girl  will  have  the  child  legally  adopted  to  parents  that  want  it... 

I  worked one  case  a  number of  years  ago,  where  the  pregnant  teen  girl AND  her  not  yet  born  baby  were  adopted  by  the  same  couple...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HUD&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8220;That girl should get herself to PP, or SRS, and REPORT being pregnant by perv Daddy…. Get perv Daddy off the streets and out of her bed… where he belongs…&#8221;  [upthread]</p>
<p>THIS  is  what  should  happen&#8230;.   Normally,  perv Daddy  will  end up  behind  bars,  and  the  child(and siblings if any)  in  foster  care&#8230;  Try  checking  with  SRS  with  a hypothetical  situation,  and  ask  what  they  would  do&#8230;.  </p>
<p>As  ws  mentioned  WAY  upthread,  the  liklihood  of  the  child  having  an  abortion that  costs  a  lot of  $$$  is  minimal&#8230;  More  likely,  the  girl  will  have  the  child  legally  adopted  to  parents  that  want  it&#8230; </p>
<p>I  worked one  case  a  number of  years  ago,  where  the  pregnant  teen  girl AND  her  not  yet  born  baby  were  adopted  by  the  same  couple&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hud</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561316</link>
		<dc:creator>Hud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561316</guid>
		<description>&quot;But of course, the best way to perpetuate that abuse to the next generation, is by allowing a 14 year old to parent.&quot;

PM,maybe I am missing something here.  So how do you remove the 14-year old for the abusive parent(s)?  

Do the abortion in secret? Seems to me keeping everything a secret just keeps the abused child in an abusive situation.  Not something I would want to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But of course, the best way to perpetuate that abuse to the next generation, is by allowing a 14 year old to parent.&#8221;</p>
<p>PM,maybe I am missing something here.  So how do you remove the 14-year old for the abusive parent(s)?  </p>
<p>Do the abortion in secret? Seems to me keeping everything a secret just keeps the abused child in an abusive situation.  Not something I would want to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561315</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561315</guid>
		<description>See,  I  get involved in  these  sordid  matters  MUCH  more  than  I  like....   And,  I  havent  found  political  persuasion  to  have  much  to  do  with  it...   Some  realities  arent  based on  political  or  religious  persuasions...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See,  I  get involved in  these  sordid  matters  MUCH  more  than  I  like&#8230;.   And,  I  havent  found  political  persuasion  to  have  much  to  do  with  it&#8230;   Some  realities  arent  based on  political  or  religious  persuasions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561314</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561314</guid>
		<description>DBF  ---  Many  times,  if not  most  times,  in  the  case  of  perv  Daddy  knocking  up  daughter,  Mommy  knows,  and either  doesnt  care,  or  is  herself  scared  to  death  to  oppose  the  SOB....   That  girl  should  get  herself  to  PP,  or  SRS,   and   REPORT  being  pregnant  by  perv  Daddy....   Get  perv  Daddy  off  the  streets  and out of  her  bed...   where  he  belongs....  

Now,  maybe  you  could  answer  the  question  that  I asked,  instead of  making  up  one  that  you  have  pre-determined  an  answer  to....   

Do you  want  to  extend  parental  authority  SO  FAR  as  to  NOT  allow  the  young  girl  to  keep  her  baby??   THAT  was  my  question,  if  you  would  go  back  and  read  it...   You  refused  to  answer  earlier....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DBF  &#8212;  Many  times,  if not  most  times,  in  the  case  of  perv  Daddy  knocking  up  daughter,  Mommy  knows,  and either  doesnt  care,  or  is  herself  scared  to  death  to  oppose  the  SOB&#8230;.   That  girl  should  get  herself  to  PP,  or  SRS,   and   REPORT  being  pregnant  by  perv  Daddy&#8230;.   Get  perv  Daddy  off  the  streets  and out of  her  bed&#8230;   where  he  belongs&#8230;.  </p>
<p>Now,  maybe  you  could  answer  the  question  that  I asked,  instead of  making  up  one  that  you  have  pre-determined  an  answer  to&#8230;.   </p>
<p>Do you  want  to  extend  parental  authority  SO  FAR  as  to  NOT  allow  the  young  girl  to  keep  her  baby??   THAT  was  my  question,  if  you  would  go  back  and  read  it&#8230;   You  refused  to  answer  earlier&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political_mama</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561309</link>
		<dc:creator>Political_mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561309</guid>
		<description>I think the key is quality of life for the child and mother rather than just life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the key is quality of life for the child and mother rather than just life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monkeyhawk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2009/04/would-secretary-sebelius-have-a-conflict-of-interest/#comment-561303</link>
		<dc:creator>Monkeyhawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 21:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=13640#comment-561303</guid>
		<description>&quot;Regular&quot; --

You&#039;ve got a stable income and obviously a lot of love.

I bet you could adopt one or two of the 871 Kansas kids looking for a family.  

Right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Regular&#8221; &#8211;</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve got a stable income and obviously a lot of love.</p>
<p>I bet you could adopt one or two of the 871 Kansas kids looking for a family.  </p>
<p>Right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
