President Obama would extend the federal government’s meddling in local school decision-making. And the rollout of his education agenda Tuesday only deepened the impression that the president is trying to do way too much too fast. But the nation would benefit if at least some of Obama’s bipartisan ideas were implemented, such as pursuing more charter schools, investing in early childhood education and “rewarding excellence in teaching with extra pay” — something usually opposed teachers’ unions. And it’s time the nation had a serious debate about whether kids need more hours or days in school than they get in our agrarian school calendar. As Obama said: “Our children spend over a month less in school than children in South Korea. That is no way to prepare them for a 21st century economy.”
Those who are still financially solvent are getting pretty sick of paying taxes to bail out banks, homeowners in default and car companies. But what happens to my home value if several of my neighbors’ homes go into foreclosure? They vacate their houses, and there goes the neighborhood and my home’s value. As much as it irks us for tax dollars to bail people out who have made bad decisions, it’s often difficult to differentiate the irresponsible from the unlucky victims of an economic downturn. And if we refuse out of principle to bail out anyone or any business, do we set in motion an economic collapse that leads all of us to financial ruin? I lean toward encouraging government to help critical businesses and homeowners in danger of default not because I think government should rescue them but because I fear the consequences if it doesn’t. — George Harris, voices.kansascity.com
President Obama’s$75 billion bailout intended to slow the nation’s foreclosure rate represents a stark contrast to Obama’s inaugural speech, in which he vowed to preside over “a new era of responsibility.” This plan is a sop to the irresponsible and a kick in the teeth for the responsible, who will be forced to cover the subsidies and handouts advocated by the president. No matter how Obama prefers to gussy it up, the price for all this will be borne by Americans who played by the rules. And they’re supposed to grin and bear it, according to supporters of housing handouts, because if foreclosures decimate their neighborhoods, it will ruin property values. Which is a lot like saying they should be happy paying protection money to the local thugs lest they find their tires slashed. — NewsRantsandReviews.blogspot.com
Rep. Todd Tiahrt, R-Goddard, seems to send out a press release every week aimed at making him appear more conservative and more engaged than Rep. Jerry Moran, R-Hays, the other Republican seeking a U.S. Senate seat in 2010. But Tiahrt should be careful not to overdo his appeals to GOP primary voters — as he did last week in announcing that he opposes Gov. Kathleen Sebelius’ nomination as secretary of Health and Human Services because of her “liberal views.” Tiahrt, as a House member, has no role in Sebelius’ confirmation, and his announcement smacked of partisan pandering and lacked senatorial statesmanship.
Last fall, Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., was a McCain man all the way, declaring in a speech to the Republican National Convention that Barack Obama’s “eloquence is no substitute for a record.” Now, the 2000 Democratic vice presidential nominee has changed his tune, telling Associated Press that Obama has “shown real leadership. Bottom line: I think Barack Obama, president of the United States, is off to a very good start.”