Open thread 1/29

221 Comments

  1. Political_mama
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:12 am | Permalink

    Today is a historic day for equality with Obama set to sign the Lily Ledbedder act that gives employees the right to sue for discrimination beyond the 180 day period. You might call Obama the Messiah in jest, but today, He, Lily,and Congress are my heros.

  2. mxyzptlk
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:24 am | Permalink

    With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
    – Steven Weinberg

  3. Heckler
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:52 am | Permalink

    Cosmos look. Climate, not weather.

    The Name is a Clue

    January 28, 2009 Posted by John at 6:30 PM

    This is one of those news stories that just make you laugh. The Associated Press reports that the snowy owl, native to the far north, has been moving south:

    snip

    But this simple explanation–snowy owls are following cold weather and snow southward–escapes the Associated Press. To the AP, the owl’s behavior is a mystery. Maybe a shortage of lemmings is driving the owls south? But no! The lemming population is thriving. That being the case, it’s an insoluble puzzle. The obvious explanation, cold weather, is unmentionable.

    What’s doubly absurd about this is that when species have moved North, the AP and other news outlets have robotically attributed the migration to global warming. Like moths, opossums, and various flora and fauna.

    http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/01/022675.php

  4. Mary_Caruso
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:07 am | Permalink

    And meanwhile the ice caps are melting, the seas are warming, CO2 is steadily rising since the beginning of the industrial revolution, and the weather is weirder than ever before…things that make you go ummmmm……

  5. American_Way
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:23 am | Permalink

    This stimulus is more of the thinking we had in the last eight years, the only difference is it is a Democratic plan instead of a Republican plan. And the Republican plan was just as fruitless FYI.

    Great post by a long time poster from yesterdays threads.

    Obama and congress = more of the same.

    The only thing that “changed” is the blue team has possession of the ball.

  6. American_Way
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:24 am | Permalink

    “And meanwhile the ice caps are melting, the seas are warming, CO2 is steadily rising since the beginning of the industrial revolution”

    Chicken Little telling us the sky is falling.

  7. Heckler
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:34 am | Permalink

    Mary

    “And meanwhile the ice caps are melting, the seas are warming”

    Uh you might want to check current data on that stuff.

  8. Boxlock20
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:47 am | Permalink

    “…things that make you go ummmmm……”—Mary

    Mary, no offense but everything, ‘makes you go ummmmm……’. And usually you seem only to come up with emotion not reason. Facts don’t seem to matter, just your intuition formed from emotion.
    Not trying to fight, just my observation.

  9. ronaldreagan
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 8:35 am | Permalink

    HamASS is the terrorist. The USA needs to support Israel and give them bunker busting bombs to deal with the the terrorists tunnels and the arab terrorists once and for all.

  10. mxyzptlk
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 8:38 am | Permalink

    WASHINGTON (CNN) — The U.S. Army will report Thursday the highest level of suicides among its soldiers since it began tracking the rate 28 years ago, CNN has learned.

    Military officials have long said it is difficult to compare the military suicide rate with that of the private sector because of demographic differences and overall human stress factors. Another factor is that military suicides tend to be young men WITH ACCESS TO WEAPONS.
    ___________________________________

    Say it isn’t so! The fact that guns are readily available has NOTHING to do with it.

  11. BlueJay
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 8:46 am | Permalink

    Bill Gates and Microsoft?

    I hardly knew ya. And I don’t much miss you.

    I have loosed myself of the shackles and busted out the “Windows”. It’s the Linux user generated operating systems for me from now on.

    BlueJay sings…

    The best things in life are free…

  12. JMWalker
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 8:47 am | Permalink

    #
    American_Way
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:23 am | Permalink

    This stimulus is more of the thinking we had in the last eight years, the only difference is it is a Democratic plan instead of a Republican plan. And the Republican plan was just as fruitless FYI.

    Great post by a long time poster from yesterdays threads.

    Obama and congress = more of the same.

    The only thing that “changed” is the blue team has possession of the ball.
    =======================================================
    . . . and your constructive suggestions on how to create the jobs lost and get the financial market on track would be . . .

  13. Regular
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 8:55 am | Permalink

    Hmmm,

    I was thinking about burning some tires in a wetlands bird sanctuary.

    Perhaps cosmos will join me?

  14. ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 8:59 am | Permalink

    Regular
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 8:55 am | Permalink
    Hmmm,

    I was thinking about burning some tires in a wetlands bird sanctuary.
    ———————————-

    Oh, I am waaaaay ahead of you Regular!

    Burn baby burn!

    I brought my shotgun too….

  15. BlueJay
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:08 am | Permalink

    Soldier on there Jimmuh!

    I’m sure they can find an orange jumpsuit for you. Maybe even with sleeves that tie nicely in the back.

  16. ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:11 am | Permalink

    Hmmm, speaking of birds….

    (chik, chik)

  17. donndublin
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:26 am | Permalink

    The new stimulus package has $400 million to put more scientists to work on climate change. I’m all for that but why do we need it if, according to Algore, it is “settled science”?

  18. lindainks55
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:27 am | Permalink

    I guess everyone here received this update from kansas.com –

    Cessna Aircraft has dramatically increased the number of jobs it will cut. It now expects to reduce its workforce by 4,600 people, up from the previously announced 2,500 job cuts as customers cancel and defer orders.”

    Things aren’t lookin’ up!

  19. JMWalker
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:32 am | Permalink

    #
    Regular
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 8:55 am | Permalink

    Hmmm,

    I was thinking about burning some tires in a wetlands bird sanctuary.

    Perhaps cosmos will join me?
    #
    ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 8:59 am | Permalink

    Regular
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 8:55 am | Permalink
    Hmmm,

    I was thinking about burning some tires in a wetlands bird sanctuary.
    ———————————-

    Oh, I am waaaaay ahead of you Regular!

    Burn baby burn!

    I brought my shotgun too….
    =====================================================
    Still waiting on those constructive suggestions . . . . . . .

  20. ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:35 am | Permalink

    Still waiting on those constructive suggestions . . . . . . .
    ———————-

    Use steel shot so you don’t pollute the water.

  21. donndublin
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:36 am | Permalink

    #
    BlueJay
    Posted January 28, 2009 at 11:06 pm | Permalink

    Wall to wall and tree top tall Chas.

    How DID I miss this?

    “Then, I will close this company down, move to another
    country, and retire.”

    SEE YA! Plenty of good folks just itching to take your place.
    _____________________

    Are you starting a new company BJ? If so, good luck to you. If you are successful, let’s see how liberal you remain when the government starts taking half you income in taxes.

    I was as liberal as you when I was young and naive. I was also politically active in the Democrats and hated Republicans, but then my eyes were open to their hypocrisy and became independent. I started my business about that time too. Real life situations teach you a lot.

  22. ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:37 am | Permalink

    Still waiting on those constructive suggestions . . . . . . .
    ————————–

    Oh and NEVER ‘pepper’ your dog…it can have nasty results.

  23. JMWalker
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:40 am | Permalink

    #
    ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:35 am | Permalink

    Still waiting on those constructive suggestions . . . . . . .
    ———————-

    Use steel shot so you don’t pollute the water.
    #
    ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:37 am | Permalink

    Still waiting on those constructive suggestions . . . . . . .
    ————————–

    Oh and NEVER ‘pepper’ your dog…it can have nasty results.
    =======================================================
    Okay, anti, let me clarify it so even you can understand:

    Still waiting on constructive suggestions on how to get jobs back and restart the failed economy. That better?

  24. ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:47 am | Permalink

    Still waiting on constructive suggestions on how to get jobs back and restart the failed economy. That better?
    —————

    Oh OK!

    One solution would be to kill the Chinese but that isn’t very practical.

    The solution in my opinion is this:

    1. Quit spending money on stupid siht (see stimulus bill)

    2. Start manufacturing quality products. (remember when we did that?)

    I don’t have time right now to go into great detail, but that is the gist of it.

  25. BlueJay
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:48 am | Permalink

    I am unsurprised to learn that your soul was for sale there okie.

  26. ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:51 am | Permalink

    Gotta go, maybe this evening I can give you a more detailed answer JMWalker.

  27. cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:51 am | Permalink

    Heckler posted January 29, 2009 at 6:52 am

    Cosmos look. Climate, not weather.

    The Name is a Clue
    ———————

    Yes “Heckler”, your nic is a clue. . .

    cosmos_originally posted January 28, 2009 at 8:54 pm

    Overcrowded Snowy Owl Swoops South
    http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2009/01/28/snowy-owl-migration.html

  28. Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:59 am | Permalink

    Still waiting on constructive suggestions on how to get jobs back and restart the failed economy. That better?

    I’ll bite.

    A) It is not the government’s duty to ‘get lost jobs back’
    B) It is not the government’s duty to do anything with the financial market.
    C) Banks made dumb mistakes. Let them fail and pay for their mistakes.
    D) Let this cycle complete on its own. Allow the market to be a capitalist market.
    E) Jobs will return on their own.
    F) Quit borrowing money.
    G) Quit trying to make –busy work- jobs that only last a couple of months.
    H) Quit handing out money.
    I) Give business (you know the people who employ people?) tax incentives to expand.

  29. cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:00 am | Permalink

    Heckler posted January 29, 2009 at 7:34 am

    Mary

    “And meanwhile the ice caps are melting, the seas are warming”

    Uh you might want to check current data on that stuff.
    —————-

    Follow your own advice, “Heckler”.

    http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/
    “As the sun set in the Arctic with the advent of autumn, seasonal ice growth was initially quite rapid, but slowed during early November.
    Average ice extent in December was well below average and very close to that measured in 2007.

    Heading into 2009, the Arctic sea ice cover is again young and thin; given this set-up, a continuation of well-below-average sea ice extent in 2009 is a near certainty.”

  30. Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:01 am | Permalink

    Cosmos,

    Why did the alarmists send a Politian to give a science brief?

    Doesn’t al-Gore own a carbon credit trading firm? Isn’t that a conflict of interest?

  31. cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:06 am | Permalink

    SolDevVB,

    Have fun futilely flailing your arms against AGW science for the rest of your life.

    ‘ADDRESSING GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE: THE ROAD TO COPENHAGEN’
    http://foreign.senate.gov/hearings/2009/hrg090128p.html

  32. Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:12 am | Permalink

    So you don’t know why a carbon credit selling politician went to Washington to give a brief on “science”[sic].

    You don’t know why al-Gore refuses to debate his “settled science”[sic] .

    You won’t explain why you won’t debate your faith with an open invitation from Hank.

    It all seems to boil down to

    Weak

    Weak

    Weak

    Praise be.

  33. lindainks55
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:24 am | Permalink

    Great news in Iraq! Seems Iraqis know what is best of them and their country and that is definitely the way it should have been all along!

    ——-

    Iraq won’t allow Blackwater to work in country

    U.S. embassy told to find new security after contractors’ ‘improper conduct’

    BAGHDAD – Iraq will not allow Blackwater Worldwide to continue providing security protection for U.S. diplomats in the country, Iraqi and U.S. officials said Thursday, a move that would deprive U.S. officials of their primary protection force.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28908486/

  34. cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:25 am | Permalink

    WHY can’t SolDevVB understand that science is “debated” via scientific methodology? Hypotheses, observations, papers, retesting, etc.

    http://www.aip.org/history/climate/timeline.htm

  35. Regular
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:28 am | Permalink

    cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:25 am | Permalink

    WHY can’t SolDevVB understand that science is “debated” via scientific methodology? Hypotheses, observations, papers, retesting, etc.
    =============================
    cosmos is not a scientist.

  36. fleettwood
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    Why are we still having this discussion?
    Why would we spend another penny on this?
    It’s over!
    Praise be.

    “WASHINGTON (AFP) – Climate change is “largely irreversible” for the next 1,000 years even if carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions could be abruptly halted, according to a new study led by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).”

  37. cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    Why can’t Hank defend his AGW denial on this blog to all readers, instead of to only one person during “lunch”?

  38. American_Way
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:37 am | Permalink

    Well our new prez has been in office less than two weeks and already has the House approving spending of nearly 1 trillion dollars we don’t have.

    Remarkable progress. Democrats rush through legislation which includes billions which obviously do not stimulate or provide near term results – without discussion.

    Normal appropriation bills are still to come for FY09 (because they didn’t pass them last year on time) as well as FY10. This will add the normal almost trillion dollars for the federal government to spend.

    So history has been made. Change has included voting without discussion, debate, or public debate and approval of spending to pay off the Obama base supporters.

    It’s been a great two weeks for socialist.
    It’s been a horrible two weeks for our nation living in debt.

  39. Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:38 am | Permalink

    Scientific methodology? Oh you mean Hansen fudging the numbers and not allowing anyone access to the algorithms. Thusly, Hansen’s work can not be duplicated by other scientists. Is that the methodology you are referring to?

    Or the scientific methodology of having a politician deliver “science”[sic] briefs? A politician that stands to make great gains in his carbon credit selling firm. A politician that stands to make great gains in government hand outs.

    All the while, the “science[sic] is settled” but the alarmists fear debate. They fear taking their religion in public with those that face reality.

    Cosmos is a prime example.

    Why do you fear Hank cosmos?

  40. American_Way
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:39 am | Permalink

    “a new study led by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).”

    Probably politically motivated. You notice NOAA is in the Stimulus Package. You know, the one that is supposed to help our economic recovery.

  41. cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:44 am | Permalink

    SolDevVB,

    What’s up with your only attacking GISS? Why don’t you attack the other temperature data sets?

    ‘What’s Up With That?’
    http://tamino.wordpress.com/2008/03/02/whats-up-with-that/

    WHY can’t SolDevVB understand that science is “debated” via scientific methodology? Hypotheses, observations, papers, retesting, etc.

    http://www.aip.org/history/climate/timeline.htm

    Why does Hank “fear” posting his support for his AGW denial on the WE Blog.

  42. fleettwood
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:45 am | Permalink

    “…unemployment insurance for the week ending Jan. 17 was a seasonally adjusted 4.78 million, the highest on records dating back to 1967. That’s an increase of 159,000 from the previous week and worse than economists’ expectations of 4.65 million.”

    That’s weird. Usually they are spot on.

  43. Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:46 am | Permalink

    No answers cosmos?

    Weak

    Weak

    Weak

    Praise be to your politician and numbers fudging paid hack at NASA.

  44. fleettwood
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:47 am | Permalink

    “The Commerce Department said Thursday that new home sales fell in December to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 331,000, from a downwardly revised November figure of 388,000.

    December’s sales pace was the lowest on records dating back to 1963. Economists surveyed by Thomson Reuters had expected sales would fall to a rate of 400,000 homes.”

    That’s weird. Usually they are spot on.

  45. Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:49 am | Permalink

    Scientific methodology? Oh you mean Hansen fudging the numbers and not allowing anyone access to the algorithms. Thusly, Hansen’s work can not be duplicated by other scientists. Is that the methodology you are referring to?

    Or the scientific methodology of having a politician deliver “science”[sic] briefs? A politician that stands to make great gains in his carbon credit selling firm. A politician that stands to make great gains in government hand outs.

    So which methodology were you referring to cosmos?

  46. cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:53 am | Permalink

    American_Way posted January 29, 2009 at 10:39 am

    “a new study led by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).”

    Probably politically motivated. You notice NOAA is in the Stimulus Package. You know, the one that is supposed to help our economic recovery.
    —————

    American_Way, don’t forget to attack the other three scientists. . .

    Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions
    http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2009/01/28/0812721106.abstract
    “. . . # # Gian-Kasper Plattnerb, # Reto Knuttic and # Pierre Friedlingsteind
    #
    bInstitute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics and
    #
    cInstitute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH CH-8092, Zurich, Switzerland; and
    #
    dInstitut Pierre Simon Laplace/Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1572 Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique–Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique–Université Versailles Saint-Quentin, Commissariat a l’Energie Atomique-Saclay, l’Orme des Merisiers, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France

  47. American_Way
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    “. . . and your constructive suggestions on how to create the jobs lost and get the financial market on track would be . . .”

    Do no harm. First rule of medicine.

    Congress should adjorn and do nothing would be ideal. At most, approve programs which directly affect (help) those unemployed workers and their families and provide for their welfare – temporarily. This would be increased funding to those specific social programs (not the Arts).
    Move up and fund projects already on the five year highway/road construction plan – no added pork for democrats districts. Review all 26 major appropriation acts (basically for each government department) to glean from them the work projects which are aleady under consideration and move them up (instead of inventing new based upon congressional districts). Increase funding for new business development/small businesses. Realize you will not help Starbucks, Microsoft, or those big businesses suffering layoffs – by handing out money like it’s candy to NON stimulus functions. Pull back money from every bank, financial institution, which cannot provide a breakdown on where they have spent/deposited the bailout money. Do not issue one penny more until audit procedures/accounting procedures are in place to ensure funding is spent as “congress intended”(which they did not do the first time). Do NOT accept the lie: They don’t know where the money went. Any accountant worth his/her salts can tell you governmental accounting has clear principles for accounting for US Funds. Use recovered funds to assist subprime mortgage holders or those truly in default (against my own principles but..). End ARMS except for those clearly with a 700+ credit rating, clear income statements (showing expenses with documentated proof).

    That’s a start.

  48. Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    When in England , at a fairly large conference, Colin Powell was asked by the Archbishop of Canterbury if our plans for Iraq were just an example of empire building by George Bush.

    He answered by saying, ‘Over the years, the United States has sent many of its fine young men and women into great peril to fight for freedom beyond our borders. The only amount of land we have ever asked for in return is enough to bury those that did not return.’

    You could have heard a pin drop.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    There was a conference in France where a number of international engineers were taking part, including French and American. During a break, one of the French engineers came back into the room saying ‘Have you heard the latest dumb stunt Bush has done? He has sent an aircraft carrier to Indonesia to help the tsunami victims. What does he intended to do, bomb them?’

    A Boeing engineer stood up and replied quietly: ‘Our carriers have three hospitals on board that can treat several hundred people; they are nuclear powered and can supply emergency electrical power to shore facilities; they have three cafeterias with the capacity to feed 3,000 people three meals a day, they can produce several thousand gallons of fresh water from sea water each day, and they carry half a dozen helicopters for use in transporting victims and injured to and from! their flight deck. We have eleven such ships; how many does France have?’

    You could have heard a pin drop.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    A U.S. Navy Admiral was attending a naval conference that included Admirals from the U.S. , English, Canadian, Australian and French Navies. At a cocktail reception, he found himself standing with a large group of Officers that included personnel from most of those countries. Everyone was chatting away in English as they sipped their drinks but a French admiral suddenly complained that, whereas Europeans learn many languages, Americans learn only English. He then asked, ‘Why is it that we always have to speak English in these conferences rather than speaking French?’

    Without hesitating, the American Admiral replied, ‘Maybe it’s because the Brits, Canadians, Aussies and Americans arranged it so you wouldn’t have to speak German.’

    You could have heard a pin drop.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    AND THIS STORY FITS RIGHT IN WITH THE ABOVE…

    Robert Whiting, an elderly gentleman of 83, arrived in Paris by plane. At French Customs, he took a few minutes to locate his passport in his carry on.

    “You have been to France before, monsieur?” the customs officer asked sarcastically.
    Mr. Whiting admitted that he had been to France previously.

    “Then you should know enough to have your passport ready.”

    The American said, ”The last time I was here, I didn’t have to show it.”

    “Impossible. Americans always have to show your passports on arrival in France !”
    The American senior gave the Frenchman a long hard look. Then he quietly explained, ”Well, when I came ashore at Omaha Beach on D-Day in 1944 to help liberate this country, I couldn’t find a single Frenchmen to show a passport to.”

    You could have heard a pin drop.

  49. CapnAmerica
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:56 am | Permalink

    Ignored Fundy-CON Bible verse d’ jour:

    Matthew 19:

    23 Then Jesus said to his disciples, “I tell you the truth, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. 24 Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.”

  50. cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 11:01 am | Permalink

    SolDevVB,

    What’s up with your only attacking Dr. Hansen? Why don’t you attack the other temperature data sets?

    ‘What’s Up With That?’
    http://tamino.wordpress.com/2008/03/02/whats-up-with-that/

  51. American_Way
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 11:03 am | Permalink

    Cosmos I’m not attacking anyone. I don’t give a darn about GW or AGW. I do care how my government wastes money and will post accordingly.

    Your posts are like fingernails on a chalkboard to me.
    Your words are a resounding gong or a clashing cymbal.
    Your repetitive drivel has become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.

    No offense.

  52. CapnAmerica
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 11:03 am | Permalink

    From a speech by two-time winner of the Medal of Honor, US Marine General Smedley Butler, 1933:

    I wouldn’t go to war again as I have done to protect some lousy investment of the bankers. There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket.

    There isn’t a trick in the racketeering bag that the military gang is blind to. It has its “finger men” to point out enemies, its “muscle men” to destroy enemies, its “brain men” to plan war preparations, and a “Big Boss” Super-Nationalistic-Capitalism.

    It may seem odd for me, a military man to adopt such a comparison. Truthfulness compels me to. I spent thirty- three years and four months in active military service as a member of this country’s most agile military force, the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from Second Lieutenant to Major-General. And during that period, I spent most of my time being a high class muscle- man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the Bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.

    ******

    You could have heard a pin drop.

  53. American_Way
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 11:05 am | Permalink

    Ignored Fundy-CON Bible verse d’ jour:

    Obama Verse:

    “Then Obama said to his disciples, “I tell you the truth, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. 24 Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.”

    Capn you have only substituted one God’s word, for another. Neither is an excuse to enact law on people.

  54. HLP
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 11:05 am | Permalink

    Why does Hank “fear” posting his support for his AGW denial on the WE Blog.
    ______________________________________

    Why does cosmos refer to my “fear”, call me a coward and yet refuse to meet for lunch and discuss things like gentlemen?

    Why does cosmos berate others on their credibility and qualifications and yet share none of his own?

    Answer:

    Cosmos is an insignificant little chicken$hit that as the earth continues to cool will eventually spin in tighter and tighter circles until he disappears up his own a$$hole.

    ________________________________

    What is your source for ENSO causing changes in climate?

    Let’s finish that discussion.

    dweeb

  55. American_Way
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 11:06 am | Permalink

    Capn, how many times over the last two years or so have you posted Smedley? Do you have your posts on Outlook Calendar with reminders to post things repetitively until someone reacts and gives you attention?

  56. Posted January 29, 2009 at 11:07 am | Permalink

    What’s up with your only attacking Dr. Hansen? Why don’t you attack the other temperature data sets?

    Why can’t you defend his actions? I raised the question, you try to defer.

    weak

    weak

    weak

    Praise be.

  57. CapnAmerica
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 11:16 am | Permalink

    AmWay–

    This is exactly the third time I’ve posted Gen. Butler.

    But thanks for keeping track . . .

  58. CapnAmerica
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 11:18 am | Permalink

    And isn’t it telling that when we want to send medical help to people that are suffering a catastrophe, the best help we’ve got is on an aircraft carrier.

    Priorities.

  59. cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 11:18 am | Permalink

    Hank posted January 29, 2009 at 11:05 am

    Why does Hank “fear” posting his support for his AGW denial on the WE Blog.
    ______________________________________

    Why does cosmos refer to my “fear”, call me a coward and yet refuse to meet for lunch and discuss things like gentlemen?
    ————————

    Because you are a coward, Hank. And because having lunch with you would be a waste of my time.

    Just post some valid arguments Hank, instead of your empty, irrelevant attacks.

    Here’s why Hank believes that climate scientists worldwide are wrong about ENSO affecting global temperatures:

    * Hank thinks that I “ain’t smart enough. . .”

    * Hank lied about what I’ve posted.

    * Hank tried to use an irrelevant, bogus “authority” line — his long-ago Navy “liason”(sic) duty.

    * Just because Hank says so. (uh-huh. . .)

    * Hank thinks that I’ve demonstrated my “incredible ignorance”.

    * Hank thinks that all the climate science and data worldwide is done by Al Gore’s “butt-boy”.

  60. CapnAmerica
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 11:21 am | Permalink

    “Then Obama said to his disciples, ‘I tell you . . .

    Yeah what’s that word when someone ridicules God’s Word?

    I remember now, blasphemy.

    Which makes AmWay a blasphemer.

  61. Posted January 29, 2009 at 11:23 am | Permalink

    Because you are a coward, Hank for inviting me to lunch to debate my faith. And because having lunch with you would be a waste of my time because I don’t enjoy having my ass handed to me.

  62. Nathaniel
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 11:25 am | Permalink

    CapnAmerica,

    I am not sure that is so much a ridicule of God’s word as it is Obama.

    What does it matter to you anyhow?

    Are you “judging” someone and saying that what they are doing is “wrong?”

    How dare you!

  63. CapnAmerica
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 11:27 am | Permalink

    Some arrogant American ambassador’s wife once asked Chou En-Lai in a loud voice which “nese” he was, Japanese, Chinese, or Balinese.

    To which he replied quietly, “Chinese.”

    Which “key” are you, Ma’am? Yankee, monkey or donkey?

    You could have heard a pin drop.

  64. CapnAmerica
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 11:29 am | Permalink

    I tell you that your narrow fundamentalist literalistic “non-interpretative” interpretation of the Bible is wrong all the time, Nathan.

    Get with the program . . .

  65. Nathaniel
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 11:32 am | Permalink

    CapnAmerica,

    How dare you judge me and tell me I am wrong.

    What does it matter anyhow, we are all going to heav, right?

  66. Posted January 29, 2009 at 11:32 am | Permalink

    Chou En-Lai

    GAWD but don’t you love the socialists…

  67. Posted January 29, 2009 at 11:34 am | Permalink

    “Realize you will not help Starbucks, Microsoft, or those big businesses suffering layoffs -” [Amway]

    Ummmm… I dont recall hearing or seeing anywhere that either Starbucks or Microsoft were asking for any financial help from government money… Care to show such a thing, or is that just another mis-direction, or red herring???

  68. Posted January 29, 2009 at 11:36 am | Permalink

    I also dont recall seeing any requests for government bail out funds from Boeing, Beech, or Cessna, or Circuit City either…

  69. Posted January 29, 2009 at 12:08 pm | Permalink

    Moody’s investment analysts seem to give the Recovery Plan a good critique ..
    “Moody’s economist Mark Zandi, who advised GOP presidential nominee John McCain, that said the stimulus bill would create or save 4 million jobs and keep the unemployment rate 2 percentage points than it would be without federal action.’

  70. Posted January 29, 2009 at 12:12 pm | Permalink

    save 4 million jobs and keep the unemployment rate

    For how long? Aren’t most of the “jobs” created mostly busy work? Like re-sodding the mall?

  71. Monkeyhawk
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 12:25 pm | Permalink

    “DavidB” –

    Through all of this I’m reminded of the old political axiom: “Good economics is bad politics; good politics is bad economics.”

    Ronald Reagan was a good politician. He doubled the National Debt in eight years and never once presented a balanced budget to Congress.

    When (the Big) Dick Cheney was sitting in Shrub’s Oval Office in 2004 he went on the record: “Deficits don’t mean anything. We learned that from Reagan.”

    Hank Paulson jumped at the chance to get $335 Billion dollars in an “emergency” and doled it out to his pals on Wall Street, demanding there be no congressional or presidential oversight over the disbursal.

    Ultimately it was bad politics for the Republic Party; George WMD Bush’s last treasonous act as president. But it may have been (and I’m fully aware of the irony) good economics or, at least, the first step to avoiding “Herbert Hoover — The Sequel.”

    The stock market crashed in October, 1929. For the rest of that year, through 1930, through 1931, through 1932, until March 1933… the Republic Party had their way.

    How did that work out for you guys?

    These neo-Hoover CONs are so blinded by their twice-born free-market rhetoric it looks positively suicidal.

    Move over, Whigs and Know-Nothings. You’re soon to be joined by the Republic Party in the dustbin of history.

  72. MODERATE
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 12:31 pm | Permalink

    When is the City going to pull the plug on the fancy new airport? Stop now. We are running out of dough.

  73. okobserver
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 12:33 pm | Permalink

    BlueJay
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:48 am | Permalink
    I am unsurprised to learn that your soul was for sale there okie.

    —————
    BlueJay I know I will regret asking but what the heck are you talking about now. I think Linyx might have corrupted YOUR operating system.

  74. Posted January 29, 2009 at 12:36 pm | Permalink

    The next economic bubble to burst – the dollar. The dollar has been building the bubble for ~20 years. Bush’s socialistic blunder – $750 billion bail out – will only be surmounted by Obama’s $1.2 trillion give away. As countries unhinge from the dollar, the dollar will fail. The landslide into oblivion will be when oil is not traded in dollars.

    Mexico is failing. They will collapse. Unless Obama decides Mexico is too big to fail and we give them billions to disburse amongst their corruption. If Mexico fails, we will be closely behind. If we bail out Mexico, our demise will closely follow.

    Precious metals. They are expensive now, but give it a year or two…

  75. Posted January 29, 2009 at 12:42 pm | Permalink

    “Unless Obama decides Mexico is too big to fail and we give them billions to disburse amongst their corruption”

    Where does this kind of insane ideation come from??? Earth to Sol, Earth to Sol, come in, Sol

  76. Posted January 29, 2009 at 12:47 pm | Permalink

    The House Republican boycott of the stimulus plan was meaningless since 1) it was going to pass anyway, and 2) the real vote will come on the joint Senate/House bill.

    So they got to play “maverick for a day.” Now maybe they can act like statesmen. Todd??? Todd?? Representative Tiahrt.. Wake up …. Please… Time to fix the things your buddies friends broke…..

  77. Posted January 29, 2009 at 12:54 pm | Permalink

    Do you know the state Mexico is in? What will Obama do if Mexico fails? If you think he wouldn’t send a loan for whatever reason, maybe you should check the spending bill that is about to cross his desk.

  78. Nathaniel
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 1:02 pm | Permalink

    SolDevVB,

    Mexico is indeed listed as a possible security risk for government collapse.

    But that prediction is not for any threat soon. It is merely a precaution that in the next 20 years or so if things don’t get better the state could collapse.

  79. Posted January 29, 2009 at 1:17 pm | Permalink

    Mexico’s financial system relies mostly on oil. Mostly on oil at or above $70 per bbl. We are now at, what, $44 per bbl?

    Drug czars and corrupt politicians. Not a healthy mix.

    Indiscriminate kidnappings. Nearly daily beheadings. Gangs that mock and kill government agents.

    This isn’t Iraq or Pakistan. It’s Mexico, which the U.S. government and a growing number of experts say is becoming one of the world’s biggest security risks.

    The prospect that America’s southern neighbor could melt into lawlessness provides an unexpected challenge to Barack Obama’s new government. In its latest report anticipating possible global security risks, the U.S. Joint Forces Command lumps Mexico and Pakistan together as being at risk of a “rapid and sudden collapse.”

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090118/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/lt_mexico_besieged

  80. JMWalker
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 1:17 pm | Permalink

    American_Way
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:54 am | Permalink
    =====================================================
    We are in 100% agreement on your post.

  81. Nathaniel
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 1:19 pm | Permalink

    SolDevVB,

    Yes, I know. And if you read the military report in it’s entirity instead of the media sound bites which sound scary, you would see that my statement is correct.

  82. RP_McMurphy
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 1:39 pm | Permalink

    I’m being moderated.
    I wonder if it hurts much?

  83. Monkeyhawk
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 1:43 pm | Permalink

    “Nathaniel” tells us –

    “…if you read the military report in it’s entirity instead of the media sound bites which sound scary, you would see that my statement is…”

    What?

    TREASONOUS?!

    You, boy, have just shared information you apparently were exposed to during your Marine Corps Reserve service.

    Lie down on this waterboard and let me ask you a few more questions about this alleged “military report in its entirety.”

    It won’t be torture or anything.

  84. Posted January 29, 2009 at 2:19 pm | Permalink

    Nathan claims that I believe, “What does it matter anyhow, we are all going to heav, right?”

    Wrong.

    What part of “I personally do not know who God will chose to go to heaven” do you not understand, Nathan?

    I do believe as Paul wrote that those who show mercy will have mercy shown to them. I wonder what those who show only judgment will have shown to them?

  85. Posted January 29, 2009 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

    “The economic crisis is an opportunity to unify people, if we set aside the politics. Let’s stop the acrimony. Let’s start solving our problems, together. Why wait one more day?” Rush Limbaugh

    (DavidB spews out a mouthful of coffee, trying not to choke)

    Well… good idea Rush… Good idea!

  86. RP_McMurphy
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 2:27 pm | Permalink

    Now there you go….judging the judge-mental again.
    Wood eye, wood eye….

    Hairlip, hairlip.

  87. lindainks55
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    DavidB,

    Could it be that Rush Limbaugh has heard of the cuts Clear Channel is making / has made? That $400 million contract he signed last summer might be a large expense to justify for a company experiencing some economic woes? Could be.

    Here’s one story about the Clear Channel cuts –

    http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/22/clear-channel-advertising-markets-equity-cx_ad_0122markets29.html

  88. sursum
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 2:35 pm | Permalink

    Sol: I don’t accept the Archbishop of Canterbury would be that impolite, nor Powell so undiplopmatic. I and others on my tour( Canadians/Americans), didn’t have any problems with French customs or people when I went over in ‘94 for the 50th anniversary of D-Day, in fact I was surprised by the kindness shown. The Aussies didn’t help in Europe in WW2 and no doubt a Canadian Admiral would have at least conversational French. The French are no slouches at international aide themselves, and your comments above shows the extend of Francophobia still alive in America. Shame.

  89. lindainks55
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 2:35 pm | Permalink

    RP, how’s that moderation going? Does it hurt like electric shock?

  90. FilmFan
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    Okay, I’m getting p-d off to the max.

    I tried leaving a post regarding yesterday’s “Oprah” show featuring Ted Haggard, and I got that same insipid “moderation” bullcrap.

    Here’s an entreaty to the Eagle blog staff: If you have some problem with me, have the huevos to say so. You’ve got my e-mail address on file.

    I can’t imagine what was in my post that was offensive. Unless there’s some fans of ex-Cardinal Law on the Blog Staff.

    Could be – nothing would shock me at this juncture.

  91. RP_McMurphy
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    Ms. Inks, it hurts!

    Me an’ the Cheif are bustin’ outta here about 3 though.

  92. RP_McMurphy
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 2:44 pm | Permalink

    film fan
    me 2

  93. RP_McMurphy
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    ting a ling, all…….

  94. Posted January 29, 2009 at 2:52 pm | Permalink

    This stuff runs through an automated filtering program… the Eagle did say it was overly aggressive , at times.

    It would be inhumane to force an Eagle employee to read these before posting, so they leave it up to a ‘bot.

  95. Monkeyhawk
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    “FilmFan” –

    Don’t try to figure out the Moderation Bot.

    Try posting a paragraph at a time.

    I found out I couldn’t mention the passing of the author of the “Rabbit” books because his second syllable is spelled the same as a slur against gay women.

    As soon as I typed “Upd Ike” I got through, probably because General Eisenhower was a Kansan.

  96. RP_McMurphy
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    where’s the unabomber when you need him?

  97. RP_McMurphy
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 2:55 pm | Permalink

    paragraph 1
    “He was insane,” said Trout.
    “How insane? He came into my bedroom at midnight. He woke me up. He said he had something important to tell me. It was nothing but a dirty joke, but this poor, sick man had come to believe it a parable about the awful blows that life had dealt him. It was about a fugitive who sought shelter from the police in the home of a woman he knew.

  98. RP_McMurphy
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    para 2
    “Her living room had a cathedral ceiling, which is to say it went all the way up to the roof peak, with rustic rafters spanning the air space below.” Trout paused. It was as though he were as caught up in the tale as his father must have been.

  99. RP_McMurphy
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

    para 3
    He went on, there in the suite named in honor of the suicide Ernest Hemingway: “She was a widow, and he stripped himself naked while she went to fetch some of her husband’s clothes. But before he could put them on, the police were hammering on the front door with their billy clubs. So the fugitive hid on top of a rafter. When the woman let in the police, though, his oversize balls hung down in full view.”

  100. RP_McMurphy
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    Trout paused again.

  101. RP_McMurphy
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 3:02 pm | Permalink

    para4
    “The police asked the woman where the guy was. The woman said she didn’t know what guy they were talking about,” said Trout. “One of the cops saw the balls hanging down from a rafter and asked what they were. She said they were Chinese temple bells. He believed her. He said he ‘d always wanted to hear Chinese temple bells.

  102. Monkeyhawk
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 3:02 pm | Permalink

    Let me help ya here, “RP_McMurphy” –

    http://tinyurl.com/bhefml

  103. RP_McMurphy
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 3:03 pm | Permalink

    p5
    “He gave them a whack with his billy club, but there was no sound. So he hit them again, a lot harder, a whole lot harder. Do you know what the guy on the rafter shrieked?” Trout asked me.

  104. RP_McMurphy
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    end
    I said I didn’t.

    “He shrieked, ‘TING-A-LING, YOU SON OF A Bee-ITCH!’ “

  105. RP_McMurphy
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    ok i beat the moderator
    not worth it

  106. Monkeyhawk
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 3:12 pm | Permalink

    “RP_McMurphy imparts –

    “ok i beat the moderator
    not worth it”

    Y’think?

  107. cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 3:22 pm | Permalink

    RP_McMurphy posted January 29, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    Now there you go….judging the judge-mental again.
    Wood eye, wood eye….

    Hairlip, hairlip.
    —————

    LOL! That’s an old joke.

    Would you like to dance. . .

  108. lindainks55
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 3:38 pm | Permalink

    RP spends his day trying to make us think he is insane. It might work! But in this nuthouse you won’t find comfort, RP. ;-)

  109. Monique_J
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 3:39 pm | Permalink

    Capn, What makes you think some people ignore Matt. 19:23 & 24? Keep reading through verse 26 and you will see that all things are possible with God. Also, please provide a verse that says God will choose who will go to heaven. He left us the Bible to answer that question.

  110. JimJohnson
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    Heh, heh, heh…

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/01/29/weather-channel-founder-blasts-gore-global-warming-campaign/

    Weather Channel Founder Blasts Gore Over Global Warming Campaign

    John Coleman, now a weatherman at San Diego’s KUSI, writes on his station’s Web site that Al Gore is ignoring the faulty research behind global warming.

  111. JimJohnson
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 3:43 pm | Permalink

    This should help keep the Planet cooler:

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,485048,00.html

    Rumbling Alaska Volcano Threatens Anchorage
    Thursday, January 29, 2009

  112. lindainks55
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 3:44 pm | Permalink

    Very trivial ‘change,’ but interesting.

    ———-

    White House Unbuttons Formal Dress Code

    WASHINGTON — The capital flew into a bit of a tizzy when, on his first full day in the White House, President Obama was photographed in the Oval Office without his suit jacket. There was, however, a logical explanation: Mr. Obama, who hates the cold, had cranked up the thermostat.

    “He’s from Hawaii, O.K.?” said Mr. Obama’s senior adviser, David Axelrod, who occupies the small but strategically located office next door to his boss. “He likes it warm. You could grow orchids in there.”

    Thus did an ironclad rule of the George W. Bush administration — coat and tie in the Oval Office at all times — fall by the wayside, only the first of many signs that a more informal culture is growing up in the White House under new management. Mr. Obama promised to bring change to Washington and he has — not just in substance, but in presidential style.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/29/us/politics/29whitehouse.html

  113. Monkeyhawk
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 3:47 pm | Permalink

    Here’s President Obama –

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/29/obama-18b-in-wall-street_n_162305.html

    I want the CONs to argue against this.

    Give us your best.

    Bring it on! And all that.

    Funny. It doesn’t seem like he’s reading off a teleprompter. It doesn’t seem like messianic oratory. It seems like a grown-up is finally occupying the Oval Office.

  114. Posted January 29, 2009 at 4:01 pm | Permalink

    Monkey, that was some straight-forward talking… even managed to work in the Super Bowl at the end… No teleprompter… as if any recent occupants of the White House, havent used teleprompters…. except for Clinton…

    But, I suppose somebody could argue that he wasnt standing behind a podium…. oh well…

  115. JimJohnson
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 4:06 pm | Permalink

    Boxlock20
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:42 am | Permalink
    “The WE Blog will be closing down soon.”–JimJohnson

    Jim, where is this info. coming from? Honest question.
    I canceled my print subscription I had maintained for probably 20+ or 30+ years over the Eagle’s biased reporting and Opinion section.
    None the less I don’t wish them to go away, in print or online including this sick meeting place called WeBlog.
    ‘mxyzptlk’, the deranged misfit, is saying it (the Eagle or the WeBlog or both are going away as well), where’s it coming from?

    ————————————-

    McClatchy Newspapers, Inc MNI is trading at 76 Cents today.

    That’s down just a bit from around $12 a year ago, and $70 four years ago.

    Bottom line is that MNI sucks. It was a BIG EVIL Corporation with GREEDY managers who were also incompetent. They bit off more then they could chew in acquisitions while at the same time, subscribers and advertisers were leaving them in droves.

    And to read this POS Blog, same crap every day from the same stupid Libs, same whiners with ZERO substance and an even lower IQ, why would McClatchy keep paying for server space for a blog with 90% idiots?

    The 24/7 Lib Posters here may need therapy to avoid suicide when this thing fiinally closes. BJ may need to find a job for something to do. Mary will use a gun to kill herself. Farmie will just spend more time with the doorknob, and Capn may have to actually spend time talking with his buddy Chas, who will have nobody to talk to now,except for the 3 people left in his congregation.

    ——————————–

    http://www.mcclatchy.com/pressreleases/story/2217.html

    Released: 01/27/2009

    SACRAMENTO, Calif., Jan. 27 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ — The McClatchy Company (NYSE: MNI) today declared a quarterly cash dividend of $.09 (nine cents) per share payable April 1, 2009 to stockholders of record at the close of business on March 11, 2009. McClatchy said it will suspend its quarterly dividend after paying the first quarter 2009 dividend for the foreseeable future in order to preserve cash for debt repayment. The first quarter 2009 dividend of nine cents per share is half the per share dividend paid in the 2008 first quarter.

  116. JimJohnson
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 4:09 pm | Permalink

    lindainks55
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 3:44 pm | Permalink
    Very trivial ‘change,’ but interesting.

    ———-

    White House Unbuttons Formal Dress Code

    WASHINGTON — The capital flew into a bit of a tizzy when, on his first full day in the White House, President Obama was photographed in the Oval Office without his suit jacket. There was, however, a logical explanation: Mr. Obama, who hates the cold, had cranked up the thermostat.
    ———————————

    Ok for Obama to stay warm burning fossil fuels, but the rest of us are causing Global Warming.

  117. dadman
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 4:18 pm | Permalink

    Members of a Gaza family whose farm was turned into a “fortress” by Hamas fighters have reported that they were helpless to stop Hamas from using them as human shields . . . .

    =================================

    try telling that to the comms’ .. the fact/s seem to evade them .. so what else is new

    http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1233050211857&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

  118. cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 4:19 pm | Permalink

    JimJohnson posted January 29, 2009 at 3:41 pm

    Heh, heh, heh…
    ————-

    No JJ. . . that’s a big ROFLMAO!

    JJ foolishly trusts a TV weather guy to educate him (JJ) about the history of climate and AGW science.

    The Amazing Story Behind Tho[sic] Global Warming Scam
    By John Coleman
    January 28, 2009
    “. . .
    The story begins with an Oceanographer named Roger Revelle.”
    ———————-

    The science actually began in the 1800’s, long before Dr. Revelle’s research.

    http://www.aip.org/history/climate/timeline.htm

  119. Posted January 29, 2009 at 4:21 pm | Permalink

    “Ok for Obama to stay warm burning fossil fuels, but the rest of us are causing Global Warming.”

    SO, now you want us to believe you know what kind of heat is used in the Oval Office??

  120. JimJohnson
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 4:24 pm | Permalink

    Oh forgot about Cosmos…

    My forecast for the End of the WE Blog actually coincides with Cosmos’ forecast for the end of the World.

    I’m providing the information to you 24/7 bloggers as a public service announcement, so that you can mentally prepare yourselves for the day when this forum is gone.

    Cosmos will have to find another GW forum to broadcast his propaganda, but then I’m confident he’ll find another site quickly, as his Google Skills to find and post links demonstrates the full extent and scope of his ability.

  121. JimJohnson
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 4:26 pm | Permalink

    Additional public service announcements regarding THE END will be posted at randomly selected intervals (so as not to alert the enemy) and also broadcast on your local Emergency Alert System.

  122. cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 4:27 pm | Permalink

    Poor JJ will have to find another blog to spread his ignorant falsehoods, like his John Coleman post.

  123. lindainks55
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 4:28 pm | Permalink

    Shoe monument for man who threw footwear at Bush

    TIKRIT, Iraq (Reuters) – An Iraqi town has unveiled a giant monument of a shoe in honour of the journalist who threw his footwear at former U.S. President George W. Bush.

    The two-metre (six-foot) high statue, unveiled on Thursday in former dictator Saddam Hussein’s home town of Tikrit, depicts a bronze-coloured shoe, filled with a plastic shrub.

    “Muntazer: fasting until the sword breaks its fast with blood; silent until our mouths speak the truth,” reads an inscription, in honour of journalist Muntazer al-Zaidi, who hurled his shoes at Bush and called him a “dog” at a news conference during the former president’s final visit to Iraq.

    Zaidi has been held in jail in Baghdad since the incident, facing charges of assaulting a visiting head of state.

    Fatin Abdul Qader, head of an orphanage and children’s organisation in the town, said the one-and-a-half-tonne monument by artist Laith al-Amiri was titled “statue of glory and generosity”.

    “This statue is the least expression of our appreciation for Muntazer al-Zaidi, because Iraqi hearts were comforted by his throw,” she said.

    http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-37735120090129

    (Monument is pictured at link.)

  124. Monkeyhawk
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 4:31 pm | Permalink

    “Chas” notes –

    “…even managed to work in the Super Bowl at the end… “

    That was a nice touch, wasn’t it?

    Politic, of course.

    He appreciates the Cardinals’ underdog status but Pennsylvania has more electoral votes! (Oh, yeah. And the better team.)

    It sorta like… I have no idea who the Jonas Brothers are other than they’re important to 10-year-old Malia Obama. But he knows they’re important to Malia and so they’re important (sort of) to him.

    I doubt — in the grand scheme of things — President Obama doesn’t really care who wins the Super Bowl. But he knows about it and probably won’t choke on a pretzel if he watches it.

    The link I posted was immediately at the end of a two-hour meeting. According to Bob Woodward, “you had George Bush for thirty minutes, tops. Or his mind would wander.” (It was an incredible scoop. Who would have thought Shrub had a mind?!)

    Still no CONs in this forum have refuted what President Obama said.

    Maybe it was a late Meals-on-Wheels delivery day.

  125. JimJohnson
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

    Chas
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 4:21 pm | Permalink
    “Ok for Obama to stay warm burning fossil fuels, but the rest of us are causing Global Warming.”

    SO, now you want us to believe you know what kind of heat is used in the Oval Office??
    ———————-

    Oh not your Highness. He uses Divine Power beemed to the White House straight from H*ll.

    He also farts Aqua Velva scent, and exhales sweet menthol cig smoke, while belching up Schlitz Malt Liquor air freshener and CO2 eliminator.

  126. Posted January 29, 2009 at 4:39 pm | Permalink

    Uh huh — You were right on target Monkey…

  127. JimJohnson
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 4:41 pm | Permalink

    2/5/09.

    Mark your calendar for the Official McClatchy annoucement of sad 2008 results.

    Funeral music memorializing the WE Blog will be played during the webcast.

    The End is Coming. Prepare for The End!

  128. Monkeyhawk
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 4:45 pm | Permalink

    “JimJohnson” on President Obama –

    “He uses Divine Power beemed to the White House straight from H*ll.

    He also farts Aqua Velva scent, and exhales sweet menthol cig smoke, while belching up Schlitz Malt Liquor air freshener and CO2 eliminator.”

    Yeah. You’re the rational voice of conservatism we should all pay attention to.

    Are you trying to be goofy or does it just come natural?

  129. Posted January 29, 2009 at 4:47 pm | Permalink

    Monkey, I am beginning to believe that Johnson and Pleefer share the same padded room at the asylum… LOL

  130. parkay
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 4:52 pm | Permalink

    Tina Williams, 19, of Syracuse, NY is now charged with felony abandonment of a child and endangering the welfare of a child. Her abandoned baby was discovered in some bushes by the suspect’s young cousin, while playing hide and seek last August. Since then, the baby has been adopted.

  131. Posted January 29, 2009 at 5:16 pm | Permalink

    Just think, Parkay… If that 19 yr. old young mother would have visited Planned Parenthood, that baby wouldnt have been abandoned, and there would be one less NY State felony…

  132. Posted January 29, 2009 at 5:18 pm | Permalink

    BTW, to watch the story of a young teen, and her unwanted pregnancy, watch the movie, JUNO…. But keep a box of kleenex handy…

  133. Posted January 29, 2009 at 5:18 pm | Permalink

    JUNO has a very happy ending!!

  134. cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 5:34 pm | Permalink

    Monkeyhawk,

    Re Obama and sports — Reggie Love, Obama’s personal aide, has an interesting athletic background.

  135. cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 5:37 pm | Permalink

    Hank posted January 28, 2009 at 6:23 am

    James Hansen’s Former NASA Supervisor Declares Himself a Skeptic
    —————

    So who is John S Theon?
    http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2009/01/so_who_is_john_s_theon.php

  136. Predestined
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 5:38 pm | Permalink

    JUNO is an excellent movie and deserved the Oscars it was nominated for and the one’s won.

  137. Predestined
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 5:41 pm | Permalink

    The word “kleenex” is a registered trademark word and should always be capitalized. (Hint: try “tissues” instead.)

    LOLOLOLOLOLOL

  138. donndublin
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 5:48 pm | Permalink

    Just heard on Foxnews:

    The capital flew into a bit of a tizzy when, on his first full day in the White House, President Obama was photographed in the Oval Office without his suit jacket. There was, however, a logical explanation: Mr. Obama, who hates the cold, had cranked up the thermostat.

    “He’s from Hawaii, O.K.?” said Mr. Obama’s senior adviser, David Axelrod, who occupies the small but strategically located office next door to his boss. “He likes it warm. You could grow orchids in there.”

    _____________________

    Didn’t he live in Chicago for the last 20 years or so? What lame excuse. Just like Algore who has a carbon footprint larger than dozens the average citizen, Obama takes hypocrisy to a higher level of conscientiousness.

  139. Posted January 29, 2009 at 5:50 pm | Permalink

    Uh Oh — Sorry PreD… I shall be certain to do that if and when I use that brand name for tissues again…. LOL

  140. Posted January 29, 2009 at 5:53 pm | Permalink

    I swear, these midget minded people will find ANYthing to b*tch about when it comes to Obama… I am sure Obama didnt like the cold much in Chicago either… especially when Chicago is normally colder than Washington, D.C. in the winter….

    What a bunch of sore losers!!

    You go Obama!!! Hang in there…

  141. donndublin
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 5:56 pm | Permalink

    #
    okobserver
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 12:33 pm | Permalink

    BlueJay
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:48 am | Permalink
    I am unsurprised to learn that your soul was for sale there okie.

    —————
    BlueJay I know I will regret asking but what the heck are you talking about now. I think Linyx might have corrupted YOUR operating system.
    ________

    I think he may have been talking about me Ok. He’s still under the delusion that you and I are the same. If you’re still around at 6:10 make a post and I’ll make one at the same time. I’ll wait till I get your confirmation.

  142. donndublin
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 5:59 pm | Permalink

    #
    Chas
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 5:53 pm | Permalink

    I swear, these midget minded people will find ANYthing to b*tch about when it comes to Obama… I am sure Obama didnt like the cold much in Chicago either… especially when Chicago is normally colder than Washington, D.C. in the winter….

    What a bunch of sore losers!!

    You go Obama!!! Hang in there…
    _____

    Do you worship liberalism as much as you claim to worship Jesus or are you just as hypocritical as Obama? Heil Obama….SEIG HEIL….SEIG HEIL!!!

  143. Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:06 pm | Permalink

    WHY would you even give a rip whether Obama is wearing his suit jacket in HIS office?? WHY do you even want to turn something so friggin trivial into a major talking point?? Besides, I heard it all on Talk Radio yesterday… It was no more intelligent there either….

  144. donndublin
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:07 pm | Permalink

    BlueJay
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:48 am | Permalink
    I am unsurprised to learn that your soul was for sale there okie.

    _______________

    No BJ, I didn’t worship liberalism when I was young the way you do now. Just like Communism you must think the State is the church to think I sold my soul when I found out how phony it is. If you think you can still keep your liberal ideals and succeed in business, you’re just another hypocrite.

  145. donndublin
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:13 pm | Permalink

    Chas, It’s not about not wearing a suit jacket, though you tried to make it the issue. It’s about keeping his thermostat so high you can grow orchids.

    Don’t you remember how he told us during the campaign how we can’t expect to keep our thermostat at 72 degrees and expect the rest of the world to like us (paraphrased)? You must have a selective memory, ignorant or worship him to defend him you way you do.

  146. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:14 pm | Permalink

    “WHY do you even want to turn something so friggin trivial into a major talking point??”

    It’s all they have, Chas.

    Well, that and the boogie man of gay marriage….

  147. donndublin
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:21 pm | Permalink

    You think you dislike him now? We’ll see what you say when they deny the permit to drill on you land.

    Dance poodle beotch dance.

  148. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:26 pm | Permalink

    I’m shocked, SHOCKED I say that you would contradict bigotbawks who says that will NEVER happen!

  149. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:27 pm | Permalink

    heheheh

    They LOVE “drill baby drill”.

    Until they dont…

  150. Monkeyhawk
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:29 pm | Permalink

    #
    Monkeyhawk
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:27 pm | Permalink
    Your comment is awaiting moderation.

    #
    Monkeyhawk
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:26 pm | Permalink
    Your comment is awaiting moderation.

    The old “Jacket in the Oval Office” is a Reagan Era trope.

    “He respected the office so much….”

  151. ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:30 pm | Permalink

    Criminals For Gun Control

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3L3kMuN8sjk

    Fantastic!

  152. Monkeyhawk
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:32 pm | Permalink

    Oh, hell. I don’t believe what made the moderation bot kick in.

  153. ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:32 pm | Permalink

    Criminals For Gun Control Part 2 – Carjacking

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCezcAHXxRY&feature=related

  154. donndublin
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:35 pm | Permalink

    #
    ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:27 pm | Permalink

    heheheh

    They LOVE “drill baby drill”.

    Until they dont…
    ___________________

    Wrong again, I hope they do drill here in our own back yard so we don’t have to buy it from those that hate us. I just don’t think the AGW alarmist are going allow it.

  155. cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:38 pm | Permalink

    donndublin posted January 29, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    He’s still under the delusion that you and I are the same. If you’re still around at 6:10 make a post and I’ll make one at the same time.
    ——————–

    donndublin,

    Based on your “Professional Engineer” expertise, and huge intelligence, what would that prove?

    This blog has one minute time stamps.

    It takes only a few seconds to post, when doing a copy/paste — and even less time, using multiple windows.

    One person could easily make multiple posts within a one-minute “window”, using 2 or more nics.

    Or two people, on 2 computers could have time stamps 1 minute apart even if they clicked “post comment” simultaneously, due to server and posting delays.

  156. ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:41 pm | Permalink

    Gun Control pt3

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYlW0N-wyVE&feature=related

    listen libs.

  157. donndublin
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:42 pm | Permalink

    #
    Monkeyhawk
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:26 pm | Permalink
    Your comment is awaiting moderation.

    The old “Jacket in the Oval Office” is a Reagan Era trope.

    “He respected the office so much….”

    _______________

    There you libs go again trying to avoid the real issue because you can’t defend it. I could care less if he keeps his office warm enough to go nude as long as he don’t try to tell everybody else to keep their thermostats down. That excuse about being from Hawaii is a bunch of crock and you know it. It’s all about, “do as I say and not what I do”.

    Now watch someone say “He is too from Hawaii!!!!”
    Chas is right, Chicago is colder than Washington.

  158. george
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:47 pm | Permalink

    I like this article; by a shut the door in the face of a journalist by the Messiah press people. Helps makes my day.

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2174523/posts

  159. donndublin
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:52 pm | Permalink

    cosMo, If you believe that Ok and I are the same person, then you’re just a delusional or as stupid as BJ. Anyone looking at our writing styles can tell we’re not. I guess we’ll have to leave it up to the moderator or whatever.

    I see you know all about copy/paste and multiple nics. What other nics do you go by?

  160. okobserver
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 6:59 pm | Permalink

    Don that was going to be my question. I know from some things he posts that he has to be here under other nics sometimes. He sure seems to know how to do it.

  161. okobserver
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:03 pm | Permalink

    Don it looks as if the two biggest brains on the blog have agreed on something. The fact that it is false doesn’t matter. If they say it three times it becomes fact.

  162. cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:04 pm | Permalink

    donndublin posted January 29, 2009 at 6:52 pm

    cosMo, If you believe that Ok and I are the same person, then you’re just a delusional or as stupid as BJ. Anyone looking at our writing styles can tell we’re not.
    —————-

    donndublin,

    Why didn’t you answer my 6:38 pm question?

    “Based on your “Professional Engineer” expertise, and huge intelligence, what would that prove?”

    Did you already forget what you thought it would prove, only about an hour ago, when you asked okie to post at the same time as you?

  163. ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:09 pm | Permalink

    Don, OK, I have been Hank, AW, Nate, (add a poster here) according to BJ/JR/ryann….

    Fact is that he is dead wrong.

    Cosmos is too.

  164. ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:10 pm | Permalink

    Oh, and Regular…

    Sorry Regular not to include you!

  165. cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:10 pm | Permalink

    Test # 1

  166. cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:10 pm | Permalink

    Test # 2

  167. Wahine_Tara
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:12 pm | Permalink

    The thing about being acclimated to Hawaii weather (where air-conditioning is rare), is that you might use a bit more energy in the winter because 70 is FREEZING, but you’ll save it in the summer when you open windows and turn on a fan instead of cranking up the A/C. It evens out.

    Mainlanders ;)

  168. Regular
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:16 pm | Permalink

    #
    Wahine_Tara
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:12 pm | Permalink

    The thing about being acclimated to Hawaii weather (where air-conditioning is rare), is that you might use a bit more energy in the winter because 70 is FREEZING, but you’ll save it in the summer when you open windows and turn on a fan instead of cranking up the A/C. It evens out.

    Mainlanders ;)
    ===================================
    Wimp!

  169. ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:18 pm | Permalink

    because 70 is FREEZING
    =====================

    Candyass! ;-)

  170. ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:19 pm | Permalink

    It is 62 degrees in my damn house right now!

  171. cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:19 pm | Permalink

    ANTI posted January 29, 2009 at 7:09 pm

    Don, OK, I have been Hank, AW, Nate, (add a poster here) according to BJ/JR/ryann….

    Fact is that he is dead wrong.

    Cosmos is too.
    ——————-

    anti,

    Please learn how to read.

    I did not accuse donndublin and okie of being the same person.

    I asked donndublin to explain WHAT his and okie posting at the same time would prove.

    donndublin refused to answer.

    It would prove nothing. Note my 2 posts at 7:10 above — from one computer. If I did have two nics, I could easily do the same thing with two nics.

  172. ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:19 pm | Permalink

    (I’m a tightass)

  173. Hud
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:19 pm | Permalink

    “…you might use a bit more energy in the winter because 70 is FREEZING, but you’ll save it in the summer when you open windows and turn on a fan instead of cranking up the A/C. It evens out.”

    You have heat? I did not have A/C or heat.

  174. ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:20 pm | Permalink

    If I did have two nics, I could easily do the same thing with two nics.
    ———————–

    Yeah.

  175. ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:24 pm | Permalink

    Cosmos, you sound like Chas.

    Please note I did NOT accuse you of being Chas.

  176. cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:26 pm | Permalink

    Maybe I’m ANTI, or maybe ANTI is me?

    We both have posts at 7:10 pm.

    Different time-stamps was how donndublin wanted to prove he was not okie.

  177. cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:28 pm | Permalink

    ANTI posted January 29, 2009 at 7:09 pm

    Don, OK, I have been Hank, AW, Nate, (add a poster here) according to BJ/JR/ryann….

    Fact is that he is dead wrong.

    Cosmos is too.

  178. Regular
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:29 pm | Permalink

    Your comment is awaiting moderation.

    #
    cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:26 pm | Permalink

    Maybe I’m ANTI, or maybe ANTI is me?

    We both have posts at 7:10 pm.

    Different time-stamps was how donndublin wanted to prove he was not okie.
    ============================
    There’s only one t.ur.d in the punch bowl cosmos.

    That would be you.

  179. Regular
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:30 pm | Permalink

    #
    Regular
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:29 pm | Permalink

    Your comment is awaiting moderation.

    #
    cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:26 pm | Permalink

    Maybe I’m ANTI, or maybe ANTI is me?

    We both have posts at 7:10 pm.

    Different time-stamps was how donndublin wanted to prove he was not okie.
    ============================
    There’s only one t@rd in the punch bowl cosmos.

    That would be you.

  180. janeeyre
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:33 pm | Permalink

    Jed,

    I didn’t check the blog from last night till just now & saw your question about Turkey Vultures. They are all over Kansas in spring & summer; that is the breeding season for them. A Turkey Vulture weighs about 4 lbs; is 26″ long; and has a wing spread of around 67″.

    In warm weather, I usually am most likely to see them somewhat east & northeast of Wichita but they can be most anywhere in the US. In the winter, they tend to hide out in southern states (Texas to Florida & some southeastern states like Georgia. We don’t see much of them in the really cold weather.

  181. Regular
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:34 pm | Permalink

    They call ‘em buzzards in Texas.

  182. ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:36 pm | Permalink

    #
    cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:26 pm | Permalink

    Maybe I’m ANTI, or maybe ANTI is me?

    We both have posts at 7:10 pm.

    Different time-stamps was how donndublin wanted to prove he was not okie.
    ==================

    Yeah yeah, I know. I tried to prove my single nic that way many moons ago. Libs pointed out the same thing.

    I just don’t care to prove who I am or anyone else is anymore.

  183. BlueJay
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:36 pm | Permalink

    “If you believe that Ok and I are the same person, then you’re just a delusional or as stupid as BJ.”

    And then you say the writing styles are different? You both are not terribly bright and given to poor spelling and reactionary posting. If you AINT the same person, humanity is gifted with two cranky old bats.

    Why so reactionary?

  184. cosmos_originally
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:37 pm | Permalink

    donndublin,

    If you don’t know how to do copy/pastes, and open multiple browser windows, you should ask someone to help you.

  185. Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:37 pm | Permalink

    Rove refuses to answer the subpoena from Congress…

  186. Regular
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:38 pm | Permalink

    #
    ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:36 pm | Permalink

    I just don’t care to prove who I am or anyone else is anymore.
    ============================================
    Slacker!

  187. ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:39 pm | Permalink

    Slacker!
    ———–

    I am slipping, sorry..:D

  188. lindainks55
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:43 pm | Permalink

    Rove refuses to answer the subpoena from Congress…

    —–

    What are the consequences?

  189. ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:45 pm | Permalink

    What are the consequences?
    —————-

    Nothing.

  190. Regular
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:47 pm | Permalink

    #
    lindainks55
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:43 pm | Permalink

    “Rove refuses to answer the subpoena from Congress…”

    —–

    What are the consequences?
    =============================
    Time out at Starbucks?

  191. lindainks55
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:49 pm | Permalink

    I guess I would probably ignore the subpoena too.

  192. HLP
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:53 pm | Permalink

    Hey Tara,

    One of the coldest experiences in my life was on the Pali Highway in ‘69. I got caught in a January rain storm coming back from the North Shore on my motor cycle.

    I about froze to death!

  193. Regular
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:54 pm | Permalink

    #
    lindainks55
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:49 pm | Permalink

    I guess I would probably ignore the subpoena too.
    ———————————
    Well, the Crats are playing with fire here.

    If they want a firestorm of revenge from Republicans in the House and Senate, they’ll get one and it will be quite painful.

    The Crats just need to move and do important business of the people, instead of this ‘fishing expedition.’

  194. lindainks55
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:58 pm | Permalink

    We sure have enough challenges!

    If there is adequate evidence of crimes those should be handled by whoever has the authority to issue a subpoena that has consequences for being ignored.

  195. Regular
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 8:04 pm | Permalink

    #
    lindainks55
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 7:58 pm | Permalink

    We sure have enough challenges!

    If there is adequate evidence of crimes those should be handled by whoever has the authority to issue a subpoena that has consequences for being ignored.
    ===========================
    Well, that’s the problem, there were no crimes committed.

    The reason for the subpoena is about the “attorneys being fired.”

    To me, it’s irrelevant – if Obama wants fire every Republican attorney out there serving the justice department, that’s fine by me. They all serve at the pleasure of the President.

    But for Pete’s sake, let’s move on, this is b..s.

  196. lindainks55
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 8:08 pm | Permalink

    I thought it was irrelevant to bring impeachment charges against Clinton for lying about something that every person who has ever been caught has lied about, especially when they knew in advance there weren’t enough votes to convict, but hey, they spent much of our money and time doing it anyway. Of course, under Clinton our country was in a bunch better shape and we didn’t have the serious challenges we do today.

  197. ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 8:11 pm | Permalink

    Do Lib women love to be cheated on and lied to?

  198. lindainks55
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 8:12 pm | Permalink

    I don’t think that is a partisan activity, neither the participation nor the hurt inflicted.

  199. ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 8:15 pm | Permalink

    I don’t think that is a partisan activity
    ===============

    I don’t either but it seems the Lib women always look the other way when a man in power cheats and lies to them…..and then they stay with the cheating/lying bastid.

  200. ANTI
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 8:17 pm | Permalink

    Well, I gotta go…got a misbehaving cat situation.

  201. lindainks55
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 8:20 pm | Permalink

    I haven’t walked a mile in their moccasins, mine have worn enough blisters and provided ample bumps in the road.

    I’ve never done any studying on who has committed the most and what party they represented and whether their spouse stayed or left or…

  202. lindainks55
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 8:22 pm | Permalink

    I can tell you much more about whether they’ve been competent in their jobs. I have paid attention to that!

  203. blogmonitor
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 8:53 pm | Permalink

    Notice to all Weblog Posters.

    With the arrival of the One, it is only fitting that to be consistent in posting we need to agree on some standard names for the Bush replacement.
    (The Weblog officially ran out of Bush Bashing Threads so have started on the Republican Party.)

    When referring to our new president with adoration, the correct political reference would be:

    “Our darling Barack…”

    Example. Our darling Barack came from a poor background and grew up in the hood of Chicago smoking cocaine and mainlining Heroin.

    When referring to our new president in his role as “The One” administering to his followers in control of both houses of Congress:

    “De fuhrer Obama…”

    Example: De Fuhrer Obama has paid back his ACORN cronies with 4.5 billion dollars of federal funding which will enable them to hire record numbers to canvass and register more democrats for the next election.

    This has been a public service message brought to you by the Weblog BlogMonitor. We will attempt to continue this service, until they pull the last plug and the newspaper finally folds when only liberals who cannot afford to subscribe are left to read it.

  204. george
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:01 pm | Permalink

    Obama praise to Allah. We give up, you the terrorists can take over the world. Hope this is not so.

    http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2009/ss_terror0079_01_28.asp

  205. JimJohnson
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:13 pm | Permalink

    2/5/09

    Watch for an Urgent Update from McClatchy.

  206. JimJohnson
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:17 pm | Permalink

    McClatchy to Webcast Fourth Quarter 2008 Earnings Conference Call

    Released: 01/13/2009

    SACRAMENTO, Calif., Jan. 13 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ — The McClatchy Company (NYSE: MNI) announced today that its fourth quarter 2008 earnings conference call will be accessible live to the media and general public via internet webcast and through listen-only, dial-in conference lines.

    The conference call will be held on Thursday, Feb. 5, 2009, at noon Eastern, 9 a.m. Pacific time. McClatchy’s earnings announcement will be released to newswire services before the market opens on Feb. 5. The full text of the announcement and the financial tables also will be available on McClatchy’s website.

    The live webcast and press release will be accessible through http://www.mcclatchy.com and an archive of the webcast will be available for future reference.

    In addition, McClatchy will provide access to the noon conference call through listen-only, dial-in conference lines. To gain access to the call, dial 1-877-278-1205 at least ten minutes prior to the scheduled start of the call. The call conference ID is 81018736.

  207. JimJohnson
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:21 pm | Permalink

    9 am Eastern on 2/5/09 is 8 am Kansas time.

    For those who don’t know.

    Hate to see you miss the show.

  208. BlueJay
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:33 pm | Permalink

    Why don’t you just go away yourself there “Jim”?

  209. JimJohnson
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:43 pm | Permalink

    Oh BJ is afraid of me. Hoping I leave.

    Soon BJ, your playground will be gone.

    What will you do then? Watch Oprah?

  210. JimJohnson
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:45 pm | Permalink

    BJ,

    About time for your sniveling lil friend Chas to show up. Then Capn.

    SSDD.

  211. Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:51 pm | Permalink

    Johnson, your caretakers are looking for you… Go back to your padded room… before you hurt yourself… ROFL!!

  212. BlueJay
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:53 pm | Permalink

    I am SO enjoying your pain there “JimJohnson”.

    How do ya like that stimulus plan sparky?

  213. Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:56 pm | Permalink

    BlogMonitor = B-M How very fitting!!

  214. JimJohnson
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 9:59 pm | Permalink

    BJ, how do you like holding your hand out?

    Getting a new bigger tin cup this year?

    How’s it feel to be dependent on someone else to take care of you and your boy?

    Must make you mighty proud.

    Teaching your boy to beg too?

  215. BlueJay
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:03 pm | Permalink

    GOOOD “JimJohnson” good!

    I can feel your pain.

  216. BlueJay
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:08 pm | Permalink

    See “Jim”? The amusement here is that you are only interesting in the speculation of who you used to be.

    Sort of the conflicted position the ideologically like…minded? such as you find themselves in.

  217. Phantom
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:25 pm | Permalink

    I believe they can charge rove with contempt of congress, and lock him up. He no longer has the administration covering his back (butt), and the new justice dept. could/would not provide him any cover either.

  218. Posted January 29, 2009 at 10:55 pm | Permalink

    good night; good luck; god bless —
    whatever you conceive god to be!!

    blessings ALL!!

    blessings on our economy!!

    so mote it be!!

  219. WSClark
    Posted January 29, 2009 at 11:11 pm | Permalink

    Children behave…………………

  220. janeeyre
    Posted January 30, 2009 at 2:19 am | Permalink

    lindainks55 at 7:43pm said: “What are the consequences?” referring to Karl Rove & his suboena from John Conyers’ House Committee.

    It turns out that there can be consequences; if the House Committee wants to, they can have him arrested & held for a Grand Jury hearing, according to the news on some of the channels Thursday evening. Remember when the woman reporter from the New York Times refused to name her source in the Scooter Libby grand jury trial & Patrick Fitzgerald sent her to jail where she stayed until Libby (or somebody else) gave her permission to answer the questions she had been asked. I think she was held for more than a few months. Do you think Rove would hold out like that for George?

  221. janeeyre
    Posted January 30, 2009 at 2:24 am | Permalink

    linda,

    The reporter was Judith Miller; it wasn’t Fitzgerald who directly jailed her; it was a judge.
    She spent 12 weeks in jail until Scooter called her & gave her permission to answer the questions.

    My memory wasn’t totally reliable so I googled her for the correct info.