Kline was the bigger story

“The Phill Kline I know was always more the story than whatever movement he represented.” – Mike Hendricks wrote in a column about Kline leaving Kansas to teach law at Liberty University and reflecting on Kline’s evolution as a politician

29 Comments

  1. BobChi
    Posted January 17, 2009 at 6:17 am | Permalink

    For the media Kline was always the story. It was a simple equation:
    Kline=bad; anti-Kline=good
    Never a pretense of objective reporting from the Eagle.

  2. JWink
    Posted January 17, 2009 at 6:24 am | Permalink

    One thing about Phill Kline is he was an exciting speaker. That was probably his greatest attribute.

  3. Pedant
    Posted January 17, 2009 at 7:54 am | Permalink

    If anybody ever doubted that Phill Kline is a radical politician then this move, to the law faculty at Liberty University, should provide crystal clear clarity.

  4. Pedant
    Posted January 17, 2009 at 7:58 am | Permalink

    “It didn’t go anywhere, though. And the fact that he pushed it without first getting buy-in from his own House leadership was one reason he was stripped of his chairmanship of the House Appropriations Committee.”

    That is how a radically ideological politician behaves, through and through.

  5. Posted January 17, 2009 at 8:07 am | Permalink

    I think the problem Kline had was that he spent so much time ’tilting at windmills’ without having the law on his side. Just how many convictions did he achieve in his jihad against ‘moral decay’? Add to that his comment that it was OK for a girl to give a guy a BJ but a crime for him to reciprocate. Just plain silly.

    AG Stephen was another one who often seemed to ‘become’ the issue. However, in his case he also had some good major victories – the water wars come to mind.

  6. Pedant
    Posted January 17, 2009 at 9:28 am | Permalink

    The more you read about Phill Kline, the more disturbing his story gets.

    I really think he’s a man undergoing an intensely personal kind of hollowing out of the soul in an attempt to create a vessel that can be filled with his idea of a purer passion, a religious fervor that surely is borne of something from his past, something very painful.

    I think the odds are excellent that Liberty sees this in him, too. I would not be surprised to learn that Liberty U finds it “prophetic” that he’s from Kansas, the crucible for John Brown’s own “new vessel” (Lincoln called Brown a “misguided fanatic”) which of course led to the attack on Harper’s Ferry and the Civil War.

    I think Liberty U sees an opportunity here to nurture both a new John Brown and a revival of the American culture war.

    The metamorphosis of Phill Kline continues, and bears watching I think.

  7. Agnatha
    Posted January 17, 2009 at 9:50 am | Permalink

    I quick comment before going back into complete lurk mode.

    Stephan had his flaws, and a creepy scandal, but in my opinion he did his job and did it well. He gave the legislature (which was then a much wiser body than the coalition conservative dominated band of dimwits it is now) excellent legal advice and represented the reality of the law even when it contradicted his own political beliefs.

    Kline, on the other hand, was a fanatic. The reason why Kline’s coverage was so negative? Because he was a negative guy who time and again let his personal crusades override his duty. He did it as a legislator, and as an AG, and as a Johnson County Prosecutor. Like Pendant said, his position at Liberty University simply reinforces Kline’s extremism. The reasons for his downfall go no farther than his reflection in the mirror.

    And that’s a fact.

  8. Agnatha
    Posted January 17, 2009 at 9:50 am | Permalink

    “I quick comment”

    should be

    “A quick comment”

    bye.

  9. Posted January 17, 2009 at 10:03 am | Permalink

    Agnatha – well said.

    Did Kline ever draft any proposed legislation to give him a legal framework to go after Tiller etc?

  10. fleettwood
    Posted January 17, 2009 at 11:20 am | Permalink

    ““The Phill Kline I know was always more the story than whatever movement he represented.””

    And who made that choice? The folks who write the stories? Then they write stories about he was “always more the story than whatever movement he represented”?

    Libs

  11. Posted January 17, 2009 at 11:24 am | Permalink

    The difference, fleettwood, is that Kline doesn’t seem to ahve really left any sort of legal legacy. Contrast that with Stephen who won major cases against Colorado and Nebraska about water rights. To me at least that overshadows whatever ‘wierdness’ he might have had.

  12. fleettwood
    Posted January 17, 2009 at 11:27 am | Permalink

    “Contrast that with Stephen who won major cases against Colorado and Nebraska about water rights.”

    How’s that working out?

  13. Posted January 17, 2009 at 11:30 am | Permalink

    Actually, reasonably well thank you. We are getting more water across the boder than we had been getting; also we collected damages.

  14. Posted January 17, 2009 at 12:02 pm | Permalink

    And how has Kline’s jihad worked out? Has abortion been eliminated yet?

  15. Monkeyhawk
    Posted January 17, 2009 at 12:09 pm | Permalink

    “Pedant” calls him –

    “…a new John Brown and a revival of the American culture war.”

    In fact, he’s Phred Felps in a better suit.

  16. The_Eagle
    Posted January 17, 2009 at 1:44 pm | Permalink

    Kline is a moron. No one can say he was fair or seeked justice while in office. He just wanted Tiller. Kline has no ethics and Kansas is lucky he is leaving.

  17. Phantom
    Posted January 17, 2009 at 1:50 pm | Permalink

    Kline was just a spotlight seeker. But when the light shined on him, it just showed his ignorance.

  18. Jed
    Posted January 17, 2009 at 3:26 pm | Permalink

    Eagle,
    “Kline has no ethics and Kansas is lucky he is leaving.”

    Kansas may be lucky, but god help the rest of the world. At least in Kansas he was as isolated from the world as you can get this side of Uzbekistan or Idaho.

  19. writerdog
    Posted January 17, 2009 at 5:45 pm | Permalink

    For one to teach the law first they must understand, respect and love the law. Kline has shown he does none of that. Never have I seen someone in the system whom has shown such utter contempt for the law.
    The criminals have more respect for the legal system than Phil Kline.

  20. Regular
    Posted January 17, 2009 at 6:18 pm | Permalink

    Thank you Professor Dog,

    When can we expect your first class on Constitutional Law? :)

  21. outlander
    Posted January 17, 2009 at 7:13 pm | Permalink

    “You want this…take your Jedi weapon! Use it. Strike me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!”

  22. Regular
    Posted January 17, 2009 at 7:49 pm | Permalink

    Sweet blade, guided not by my hand, but by providence. Behold the glory, the punctilious point contours a soft furrow.

    Regular – 2009

  23. Mary_Caruso
    Posted January 17, 2009 at 8:00 pm | Permalink

    Just a reminder…for all those wanting to celebrate Obama’s inauguration…we’re getting together in the back room of The Anchor on Friday night..starting around 6:30. Hope to see you there!

  24. Posted January 17, 2009 at 8:03 pm | Permalink

    cool, thanx for the invite Mary, I think I’ll show up, haven’t been to the Anchor for a good three weeks

  25. Mary_Caruso
    Posted January 17, 2009 at 8:09 pm | Permalink

    The chicken wings are to die for!

  26. Jed
    Posted January 18, 2009 at 1:41 am | Permalink

    Mary,
    I’m going to try to come to that!

  27. writerdog
    Posted January 18, 2009 at 8:31 am | Permalink

    It depends Regular, which Constitution are you thinking of? The one written back in the seventeen hundreds or the one written by those whom think it was written on toilet paper in the twenty second hundreds?

  28. writerdog
    Posted January 18, 2009 at 8:49 am | Permalink

    Kline did not follow the law and for that matter he did not even use the law. He throw out the law and only used the office he held to be a figure head on the paper he used. He disrespected the law and the office, violated the faith in the system put there by the people of Kansas to enforce and obey the law.

    Did somehow God tell him to do this? No, he did it solely on his own and can not be excused or overlooked by shifting the blame. He abuse the power and trust placed in the office and himself.

  29. The_Truth
    Posted January 18, 2009 at 9:44 am | Permalink

    Kline is Slime.