Are states open to federal loans?

Most cash-strapped states have expected that any federal help they get through the stimulus package would take the form of a grant. But on ABC’s “This Week” Sunday, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., touted loaning the money instead. “I think nobody thinks we ought to be spending this money on things like Mob museums and waterslides,” McConnell said. “And if the money were lent rather than just granted, states would, I think, spend it wisely, and the states that didn’t need it at all wouldn’t take any.” But some states that need the money but can’t afford more debt wouldn’t take any either, defeating the purpose.

12 Comments

  1. JWink
    Posted January 6, 2009 at 6:04 am | Permalink

    Kansas and other states might as well apply directly to China or set up their own printing presses to manufacture money. Of course, the most prudent way would be to reduce spending.

    Sometimes its wise to look at how individuals and/or families would handle it if faced with reduced income.

  2. Political_mama
    Posted January 6, 2009 at 6:26 am | Permalink

    What do you do when you’re broke, can’t work, and can’t get food?

  3. JWink
    Posted January 6, 2009 at 6:34 am | Permalink

    P.M.: Run for political office.

  4. lindainks55
    Posted January 6, 2009 at 8:47 am | Permalink

    What purpose does Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., think he and his would fill if the states each go it alone? Doesn’t that take “united” out of the equation? Isn’t his job supposed to be be working as a United States Senator?

    Another Senator trying to prove he is a bigger idiot than most people thought.

  5. Phantom
    Posted January 6, 2009 at 9:39 am | Permalink

    Well, if they’re going to make loans, they’ll need to make sure the states are viable, and they’re not just prolonging the inevitable!

  6. mom
    Posted January 6, 2009 at 9:42 am | Permalink

    Didn’t McConnell hold onto his seat by a slim margin? Who is he to be telling the rest of the country what to do.

    Isn’t it ironic McConnell is now questioning how Congress spends the money but didn’t question Bush and Cheney how they were spending billions of dollars on all their spending sprees?

    Typical Republican – do as I say and not as I do.

  7. lindainks55
    Posted January 6, 2009 at 9:49 am | Permalink

    If the federal government decides its purpose is to be a bank, citizens should be able to decide whether that bank has merit or they prefer to put their money in another institution.

    We knew federal government produces nothing, generates no revenue but instead takes our money, spends every penny plus, but it was expected that some of that money would take care of infrastructure, public works, safety, roads, etc.

    When states must borrow the money to take care of our infrastructure they might as well decide which bank they want to use along with all us citizens.

    If government at the federal level is as useless as Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, yet he (and all the others no better than he) continues to be elected who is it that is the most foolish? Would that be us?

  8. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted January 6, 2009 at 9:54 am | Permalink

    “What purpose does Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., think he and his would fill if the states each go it alone? Doesn’t that take “united” out of the equation? Isn’t his job supposed to be be working as a United States Senator?”

    Well, he is from the south. Maybe he’s still fighting the civil war.

    We shoulda let them go…

  9. Phantom
    Posted January 6, 2009 at 10:26 am | Permalink

    You can bet Kentucky will be the first in line whether it’s for a loan or grant!

  10. brian_nuevo
    Posted January 6, 2009 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

    Where did the money come from in the first place (ultimately)? The taxpaying people.
    Where do those people reside? In states.
    Where does McConnell get off thinking he is going to loan the people’s money back to them?

  11. Pleefer
    Posted January 7, 2009 at 5:30 am | Permalink

    “Where does McConnell get off thinking he is going to loan the people’s money back to them?”

    Hahaha.

    9 out of 10 people did NOT want the bankster “bailout”, yet it still passed. Do you honestly believe “The People” matter anymore? Really?

    The criminality of this government is rampant, full of hubris and bolstered by the fact that those 10 people that called about the bailout were no more than 20% of the entire population.

    Americans just don’t give a siht.

  12. BraydenY
    Posted January 17, 2009 at 12:50 am | Permalink

    Landing employment with the Federal Bureau of Investigation will not only get you a bigger payday, but will ensure you won’ need payday loans to get by. Federal Government jobs involve good pay, and the benefits are among the best a person can get. Although the economy is currently in crisis, fighting crime is still a lucrative trade evidently, because the FBI is going on the biggest hiring binge since October 2001. The FBI is hiring almost 3,000 new employees, including 850 positions available for special agents, all of those won’t be needing payday loans for a very long time. However, regardless of how many positions are open, the FBI is one of the most exclusive employers. They are absolutely selective when it comes to hiring employees. Even the most basic of positions require a credit check, four year degree, extensive experience, top secret clearance and an unimpeachable background. They are looking for the best, and only the best need apply.

    Investigate yourself by clicking payday loans to read about it in a bit more detail.