Obama’s gonna break his promises?

Wow, that is news!

(Read it and weep Cosmos, your boy isn’t gonna save the world afterall.)

http://www.wunderground.com/blog/RickyRood/comment.html?entrynum=41&tstamp=200709

Carbon isotopes and,

‘How do we know that recent CO2 increases are due to human activities?’
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=87
“However, it is the fact that we produce CO2 faster than the ocean and biosphere can absorb it that explains the observed increase.”

Accurate? There’s no way of knowing, since it’s from E & E.

Have other scientists reviewed, and duplicated their work? You know, that little thing called scientific methodology.

Silly rabit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_and_environment

donndublin posted December 19, 2008 at 9:30 am

The earth is the biggest producer of CO2.
——————–

That’s irrelevant.

What’s important is that Earth’s natural CO2 sinks cannot absorb all of the CO2 humans have produced.

That has caused CO2 levels to rise higher than they’ve been in 800,000 years.

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7193/full/453291a.html
____________________________________________________

What is that a smoke screen?

“Carbon dioxide variability is almost universally viewed as an oceanic phenomenon, a consequence of the large pools of carbon sequestered there. Changes in ocean circulation, biological productivity, carbon dioxide solubility and other aspects of ocean chemistry have been implicated, but the exact mix of mechanisms IS NOT CLEAR.”

How do you come to that conclusion? I doubt you really understand what your are saying.

To better put the current temperatures in perspective, let’s see the graph contained in this article. Which shows a 2,000 year temperature trend. Here ya go. Interesting.

http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2008/02/11/a-2000-year-global-temperature-record/

The earth is the biggest producer of CO2.
——————–

That’s irrelevant.

What’s important is that Earth’s natural CO2 sinks cannot absorb all of the CO2 humans have produced.

That has caused CO2 levels to rise higher than they’ve been in 800,000 years.

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7193/full/453291a.html

If this global cooling trend continues, will we see government regulations requiring businesses to INCREASE the amount of GHGs they release?
—————-

The second graph here is outlander’s proof(sic) that there is a “global cooling trend”.

http://tamino.wordpress.com/2008/12/17/2008-temperature-summaries-and-spin/

Along with lies from Sen. Inhofe (R-Oil), agricultural economist Dennis Avery, and similar scientifically ignorant AGW deniers.

The AGW crowd tries to accuse the skeptics of wanting a dirty world when nothing can be further from the truth. The skeptics are more concerned about the short term affects of the draconian measures the AGW crowd wants to rush to impose on the already fragile economies of the world.

will be easy once the last American factory shuts down and takes their business overseas.

We won’t need cars because we will have no money to spend anywhere anyway.

Horses might prove to be important again when we shop closer to home (neighborhood).

Outhouses? I’m sure the greens will come up with a reason to restore them.

Perhaps once America stops progressing, and we have birds, lizards, trees, everywhere, we might have to take things a step FURTHER back than 1905.

If GW continues, we may need to revert to the stone age.

Just read what the GW nuts are writing – it could happen.

He had better or we will fire him and get someone who can.

The days of carefree tearing up the environment are over folks.

All you AGW doubters out there looking for factual evidence, you need to have faith and show some compassion for poor people.

By capitulating to the demands of the AGW believing scientists, you will be helping to prevent poor people from dying off at an old age due to global warming.

If we can get the poor to die off at age 47 due to out-of-reach energy and food prices, we solve that serious problem and do a good deed for all humanity.

Ya’ll See?

I’ve had XM since it came out.

Oh well, I still have channel 6.