I have a feeling you believe in GW the same way that Nathan and Hank believe in the young Earth.
It is only and forever a matter of Faith.
I must say, they are not insulting about our differences in the origin argument. You seem to use the insult as your first weapon. “You don’t believe in Global Warming”? “Well, you must be really stupid”. “And I’ll badger the elementary children until they are on board!
——————–

Nope! It’s a matter of scientific methodology, and observations.

You want to refute the AGW theory? Then you have to do the following:

Show that CO2, methane, etc are not “greenhouse” gases, and that higher levels of those GHG’s would not cause GW.

And explain what causes the following (which are explained by AGW)

* The warming since the mid-1970’s (solar and cosmic rays do not explain it)

* Fastest warming at upper Northern latitudes

* Higher ocean heat content.

* Cooling of Earths upper atmosphere.

Well, let’s do this.

I volunteer to meet “fleetwood” and “Regular” at a time and place of their choosing as is convenient and agreeable to me and my schedule.

This gives “Regular” the chance to shoot me and “fleetwood” the chance to prove he isn’t “Regular”.

Since “fleetwood” seemed to sound an awful lot LIKE “Regular” in that last?

The invite is out.

It’s midnight America. Another hour and day closer to better times.
—————–
How about this numb nuts,

Just stop accusing posters of switching nics and being some one else.

Moron

As chas would say (in CAPS):

I win. Which means ya’ll don’t. Oh well.

I have a feeling you believe in GW the same way that Nathan and Hank believe in the young Earth.
It is only and forever a matter of Faith.
I must say, they are not insulting about our differences in the origin argument. You seem to use the insult as your first weapon. “You don’t believe in Global Warming”? “Well, you must be really stupid”. “And I’ll badger the elementary children until they are on board!

Does it prove that GW is IFFY?
———–

Nope! It just proves that the BDP is very ignorant and/or stupid re AGW science.

Does it prove that GW is IFFY?

You better hurry up and get in line for your “free” government handouts.

Things will be so much better… LOL

Just keep telling yourself that. In 4 years and maybe even after 8 years of Obama you will still be right where you are at with your hand out wondering why your life isn’t any better.

Thank you for yet AGAIN proving my 12:01 am post, with your 12:35 am post.

Thank you for yet AGAIN proving my 12:01 am post, with your 12:30 am post.

“We draw your attention to three observational refutations of the IPCC position (and note there are more). Ice-core data from the ACIA (Arctic Climate Impact Assessment) shows that temperatures have fallen since around 4,000 years ago (the Bronze Age Climate Optimum) while CO2 levels have risen, yet this graphical data was not included in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers (Fig. SPM1 Feb07) which graphed the CO2 rise.”

You mean this bit of sensible thought?
Like usual, you people go over the board.

I thought changing our lawn mower engines was going to save all of us. Not enough?

Thank you for proving my 12:01 am post, with your 11:55 pm post.

Well-mixed atmospheric CO2 levels have risen by about 100 ppm since the Industrial Age, and are higher than they’ve been for about 800,000 years.

Would you please “discuss” why you insisted that Ben said that those levels were “static”?

http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/open-thread-1119/#comment-471808

That is silly. You’ve been on this blog long enough to know better.

My denial of Global warming? That’s easy. You people use it for your own purposes. Totally bogus.

I asked you a question (without the insults), are you paid?
—————-

No. Who would pay someone to post on a blog that features the BDP, multi-nic’d Regular, et al?

And your denial of AGW science is stupid and ignorant. That’s a fact, not an “insult”.

I volunteer to meet “fleetwood” and “Regular” at a time and place of their choosing as is convenient and agreeable to me and my schedule.

This gives “Regular” the chance to shoot me and “fleetwood” the chance to prove he isn’t “Regular”.

Since “fleetwood” seemed to sound an awful lot LIKE “Regular” in that last?

The invite is out.

It’s midnight America. Another hour and day closer to better times.

“Before we radically rearrange the political economy of the world…, it might be worthwhile for anyone taking a position on the topic to consider whether or not this is indeed “well settled science.””

“I used this data to show that the trend at 300 hPa was not about 2.5 x the surface trend which is what greenhouse warming [models] requires.” Apparently climate models that predict global warming ala increasing levels of atmospheric CO2 assume increasing temperature trends in the troposphere, where CO2 concentrates, and the reality is the troposphere is not getting hotter, it is getting cooler.

Before we radically rearrange the political economy of the world because some scientists claim anthropogenic CO2 is the cause of climate change, it might be worthwhile for anyone taking a position on the topic to consider whether or not this is indeed “well settled science.”

As seen in cosmos November 21, 2008 at 11:49 pm post

and Junior’s November 21, 2008 at 10:59 pm post.

Regular posted November 19, 2008 at 8:00 pm
#
cosmos_originally posted November 19, 2008 at 7:56 pm

Regular,

This is a public blog. If you want to have a private conversation with Blaidd, then get his/her email, and have it away from this blog.
======================
Correct, this is a public blog.

It also means it doesn’t give you license to harass other posters day after day over a three year period.
—————————————-

Regular, if you don’t want to see examples of your lies, then don’t ask to see them.

Regular posted November 19, 2008 at 11:09 am
Oh yeah?

Name some of those proven lies
======================
Again dunder head, I did not address this to you now did I?

What part of ‘unwelcome butting in’ do you not understand?

No, I am not. I have answered your question. I asked you a question (without the insults), are you paid? I will say again (being a capitalist/entrapanure (or however you spell it, I hope you are.

I’m not sure if that will satisfy BJ. He’s known all along that you were collecting benefits you earned, and he calls it “welfare” on the taxpayer.

Then, he’s the first in line to call foul on Walter Reed. Go figure.

Well THAT’s interesting.

I asked “fleetwood” a question and “Regular” answered it.
—————
No, what’s interesting is why you are so obsessed with me even when I’m not online. I just happen to stop by.

Since you took the coward’s way out on the meet up, you did not get the privilege of meeting me or seeing my military ID card – (of which I said I would show to you before the meeting)

dumb ass

Are you paid to post your stupid, ignorant falsehoods opposing the AGW theory?

I asked “fleetwood” a question and “Regular” answered it.