<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fairness Doctrine baloney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:20:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JMWalker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474850</link>
		<dc:creator>JMWalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474850</guid>
		<description>Awwww, poor dd. Well, you got posted here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awwww, poor dd. Well, you got posted here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donndublin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474774</link>
		<dc:creator>donndublin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 01:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474774</guid>
		<description>“Give me a fuc#ing break.”- Monkeyhawk

I can&#039;t believe that neolibs like BJ, Rage, Chas and Monkey can talk trash and still get posted. I was recently banned from Huffpost for expressing my conservative views. This was after I complained to Arianna herself that I was frustrated for not seeing half my comments posted. I never used implied expletives or made personal attacks on other blogers. The neo-lib posters are free to go on all kinds of rants with no substantive thoughts or ideas.  

It seemed Huff didn&#039;t want my views or reference links to be heard or seen by their viewers. Huffpost is a typical liberal media that as far from ‘fair and balanced” as it can be. I’ve heard nothing but direct blatant and vicious attacks on Rush and other Conservatives nothing near what you accuse Rush and the others of doing. 

You libs seem to have become what you hate whether it’s real or imagined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Give me a fuc#ing break.”- Monkeyhawk</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe that neolibs like BJ, Rage, Chas and Monkey can talk trash and still get posted. I was recently banned from Huffpost for expressing my conservative views. This was after I complained to Arianna herself that I was frustrated for not seeing half my comments posted. I never used implied expletives or made personal attacks on other blogers. The neo-lib posters are free to go on all kinds of rants with no substantive thoughts or ideas.  </p>
<p>It seemed Huff didn&#8217;t want my views or reference links to be heard or seen by their viewers. Huffpost is a typical liberal media that as far from ‘fair and balanced” as it can be. I’ve heard nothing but direct blatant and vicious attacks on Rush and other Conservatives nothing near what you accuse Rush and the others of doing. </p>
<p>You libs seem to have become what you hate whether it’s real or imagined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kansasdem</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474601</link>
		<dc:creator>kansasdem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474601</guid>
		<description>O&#039;Reilly, O&#039;Limbaugh, O&#039;Ingram, O&#039;Shaunessey and O&#039;Ailes have nothing to fear from a re-run of the Fairness Doctrine -- they&#039;re already &quot;fair and balanced,&quot; right?

The suggestion that a new version of the Fairness Doctrine won&#039;t work and can&#039;t be successfully enforced, baloney!  It worked fine for the better part of 40 years.  

If Rupert Murdoch doesn&#039;t like it, let him start his own cable or satellite channel.  The terrestial airwaves and frequencies are a public asset and should be used for the public good.  Bloviating idiots and the exclusion of fairness and balance fail to meet that test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O&#8217;Reilly, O&#8217;Limbaugh, O&#8217;Ingram, O&#8217;Shaunessey and O&#8217;Ailes have nothing to fear from a re-run of the Fairness Doctrine &#8212; they&#8217;re already &#8220;fair and balanced,&#8221; right?</p>
<p>The suggestion that a new version of the Fairness Doctrine won&#8217;t work and can&#8217;t be successfully enforced, baloney!  It worked fine for the better part of 40 years.  </p>
<p>If Rupert Murdoch doesn&#8217;t like it, let him start his own cable or satellite channel.  The terrestial airwaves and frequencies are a public asset and should be used for the public good.  Bloviating idiots and the exclusion of fairness and balance fail to meet that test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donndublin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474558</link>
		<dc:creator>donndublin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474558</guid>
		<description>What liberals afraid of? Why can&#039;t they just have their own radio talk shows to express their opinions? Is it because they can&#039;t compete in the free market? Pendant and other liberals should not confuse FACTS with OPINIONS. Just because you have an opinion doesn’t make it a fact. I though it was a liberal concept to believe that there are no absolutes which is an oxymoron. Of course you must think the only absolute being that liberal thinking is always right taking hypocrisy to a New Age psycho-babble higher form of consciousness. 

Here is fact for you all to digest. According to most polls 80-90% of journalists are liberal or registered Democrats. If you think there ideology doesn’t affect their writing then you must think they have evolved into some kind of supreme form of being. Conservatives are not ashamed to admit who they are unlike their adversaries. The so called “Fairness Doctrine” is targeted at talk radio which is the only media they don’t dominate. If it were to be truly fair then it should be enforced on network TV and academia but I doubt that will happen. This is no surprise because history past and recent shows us the Socialists don’t tolerate dissent. One only needs to look at China, Cuba or the former Soviet Union to know what the facts are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What liberals afraid of? Why can&#8217;t they just have their own radio talk shows to express their opinions? Is it because they can&#8217;t compete in the free market? Pendant and other liberals should not confuse FACTS with OPINIONS. Just because you have an opinion doesn’t make it a fact. I though it was a liberal concept to believe that there are no absolutes which is an oxymoron. Of course you must think the only absolute being that liberal thinking is always right taking hypocrisy to a New Age psycho-babble higher form of consciousness. </p>
<p>Here is fact for you all to digest. According to most polls 80-90% of journalists are liberal or registered Democrats. If you think there ideology doesn’t affect their writing then you must think they have evolved into some kind of supreme form of being. Conservatives are not ashamed to admit who they are unlike their adversaries. The so called “Fairness Doctrine” is targeted at talk radio which is the only media they don’t dominate. If it were to be truly fair then it should be enforced on network TV and academia but I doubt that will happen. This is no surprise because history past and recent shows us the Socialists don’t tolerate dissent. One only needs to look at China, Cuba or the former Soviet Union to know what the facts are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: writerdog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474134</link>
		<dc:creator>writerdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474134</guid>
		<description>If there were only one outlet than by all means yes make it fair and balanced but that is not the case.
And yes in many cases I found the likes of O’Reilly and Rush to be no better then the guy who points and make a rude comment about someone that is handicapped. But the market is the market and they are not alone in their mindless views. You can still find on the radio White supremacy stations and every time I come across one. I think where do they find the funds to continue to be on the air? But they do and it goes to show that no matter how offensive an ideology becomes it is the market and not person opinion of the ideology that dictates whether it is aired or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there were only one outlet than by all means yes make it fair and balanced but that is not the case.<br />
And yes in many cases I found the likes of O’Reilly and Rush to be no better then the guy who points and make a rude comment about someone that is handicapped. But the market is the market and they are not alone in their mindless views. You can still find on the radio White supremacy stations and every time I come across one. I think where do they find the funds to continue to be on the air? But they do and it goes to show that no matter how offensive an ideology becomes it is the market and not person opinion of the ideology that dictates whether it is aired or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474108</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474108</guid>
		<description>Bring  back  the  Fairness  Doctrine...  WE NEED  IT!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bring  back  the  Fairness  Doctrine&#8230;  WE NEED  IT!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474107</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474107</guid>
		<description>BJ  --  How  MANY  of  those  posts  on  the &quot;bastard child&quot;  page  were  Hank&#039;s  nic  being  stolen(or jumped)???   That  was  quite  a  long  section,  and  no  comment  from  HLP  on having  his nic  jumped....  Was it  back  to  the  REAL  Hank  by  the  time  he  starts  talking  duck  eggs,  and  noodles  and  macaroni???  Or  was  he  back  before  that???  Or  was it  after  that???   Just  wondering.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BJ  &#8212;  How  MANY  of  those  posts  on  the &#8220;bastard child&#8221;  page  were  Hank&#8217;s  nic  being  stolen(or jumped)???   That  was  quite  a  long  section,  and  no  comment  from  HLP  on having  his nic  jumped&#8230;.  Was it  back  to  the  REAL  Hank  by  the  time  he  starts  talking  duck  eggs,  and  noodles  and  macaroni???  Or  was  he  back  before  that???  Or  was it  after  that???   Just  wondering&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueJay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474100</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 05:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474100</guid>
		<description>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/open-thread-1120/#comments


   When you get there, do a text search on the word   &quot;bastard&quot;. Go from there.

   IS it Hank? Is his nic being &quot;jumped&quot;?

   I met the guy. He has a spongy handshake and can&#039;t look you in the eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/open-thread-1120/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/open-thread-1120/#comments</a></p>
<p>   When you get there, do a text search on the word   &#8220;bastard&#8221;. Go from there.</p>
<p>   IS it Hank? Is his nic being &#8220;jumped&#8221;?</p>
<p>   I met the guy. He has a spongy handshake and can&#8217;t look you in the eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueJay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474098</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 05:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474098</guid>
		<description>Why are you answering for &quot;American way&quot; Hank?

   &quot;That being said observing that your boy is a bastard is dumping on you. He had no choice in the sorry parents he ended up with. Also, have you ever done a DNA test? You always know who the mother is!

Furthermore, see if you can wrap your twisted little mind around this fact; I didn’t call your son a bastard. Someone jumped my nic the other day. I didn’t say nothing then because I was trying to figure out who it might be. I haven’t a clue, but it wasn’t me.&quot;

   So, you called my son a bastard to hit at me and not him....

   but it was not YOU who did it because your nic was jacked?

   Hank? I think you just joined Bawks and Regular as to credibility.

   UNLESS of course, your last post was jacked as well. In which case you have issues with those on your side stealing your nic.

    If not? You just Bugs Bunnied yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are you answering for &#8220;American way&#8221; Hank?</p>
<p>   &#8220;That being said observing that your boy is a bastard is dumping on you. He had no choice in the sorry parents he ended up with. Also, have you ever done a DNA test? You always know who the mother is!</p>
<p>Furthermore, see if you can wrap your twisted little mind around this fact; I didn’t call your son a bastard. Someone jumped my nic the other day. I didn’t say nothing then because I was trying to figure out who it might be. I haven’t a clue, but it wasn’t me.&#8221;</p>
<p>   So, you called my son a bastard to hit at me and not him&#8230;.</p>
<p>   but it was not YOU who did it because your nic was jacked?</p>
<p>   Hank? I think you just joined Bawks and Regular as to credibility.</p>
<p>   UNLESS of course, your last post was jacked as well. In which case you have issues with those on your side stealing your nic.</p>
<p>    If not? You just Bugs Bunnied yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HLP</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474092</link>
		<dc:creator>HLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474092</guid>
		<description>BlueJay
Posted November 22, 2008 at 9:22 pm &#124; Permalink

Wanna bag on my kid some more “American way”?
________________________________________________
LOL

A few points need to be made here, just to illustrate how incredibly screwed up you are, BlueJay.

I know that you are so hung up on me that it is down right creepy at times but I think all in all you&#039;re really too lazy to be much of a danger to anyone.  I am not American_Way.  I only post using HLP.

That being said observing that your boy is a bastard is dumping on you.  He had no choice in the sorry parents he ended up with.  Also, have you ever done a DNA test?  You always know who the mother is!

Furthermore, see if you can wrap your twisted little mind around this fact;  I didn&#039;t call your son a bastard.  Someone jumped my nic the other day.  I didn&#039;t say nothing then because I was trying to figure out who it might be.  I haven&#039;t a clue, but it wasn&#039;t me.

Something more to feed your paranoia!  The nics that aren&#039;t mine that you think are mine aren&#039;t mine and sometimes even my nic isn&#039;t me!

Damn I love this BLOG!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BlueJay<br />
Posted November 22, 2008 at 9:22 pm | Permalink</p>
<p>Wanna bag on my kid some more “American way”?<br />
________________________________________________<br />
LOL</p>
<p>A few points need to be made here, just to illustrate how incredibly screwed up you are, BlueJay.</p>
<p>I know that you are so hung up on me that it is down right creepy at times but I think all in all you&#8217;re really too lazy to be much of a danger to anyone.  I am not American_Way.  I only post using HLP.</p>
<p>That being said observing that your boy is a bastard is dumping on you.  He had no choice in the sorry parents he ended up with.  Also, have you ever done a DNA test?  You always know who the mother is!</p>
<p>Furthermore, see if you can wrap your twisted little mind around this fact;  I didn&#8217;t call your son a bastard.  Someone jumped my nic the other day.  I didn&#8217;t say nothing then because I was trying to figure out who it might be.  I haven&#8217;t a clue, but it wasn&#8217;t me.</p>
<p>Something more to feed your paranoia!  The nics that aren&#8217;t mine that you think are mine aren&#8217;t mine and sometimes even my nic isn&#8217;t me!</p>
<p>Damn I love this BLOG!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjb</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474090</link>
		<dc:creator>bjb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474090</guid>
		<description>We need a fairness doctrine as to the dying print media to overcome the obvious bias of the Kansas newspapers, some of which is documented under the media misdeeds section of my blog.

By way of example, remember that KU prof who alleged he was slapped around but fell silent once he was investigated for potentially filing a false police report?  What, have not heard anymore on that subject?  Not from the &quot;in the tank for the LEft&quot; Kansas media you have not.  But imagine if he had been a conservative.  THe REd Star and Beagle would still have his skinned hide as a lampshade in their editorial offices.
Right next to mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need a fairness doctrine as to the dying print media to overcome the obvious bias of the Kansas newspapers, some of which is documented under the media misdeeds section of my blog.</p>
<p>By way of example, remember that KU prof who alleged he was slapped around but fell silent once he was investigated for potentially filing a false police report?  What, have not heard anymore on that subject?  Not from the &#8220;in the tank for the LEft&#8221; Kansas media you have not.  But imagine if he had been a conservative.  THe REd Star and Beagle would still have his skinned hide as a lampshade in their editorial offices.<br />
Right next to mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueJay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474082</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474082</guid>
		<description>Rant radio is a lot like Bawks. (The poster formerly known as Boxlock)

    All blow, and no show.

    I wonder which one of them would like to be next to &quot;prank&quot; me?

    Oh, and I already know who &quot;JimJohnson&quot; is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rant radio is a lot like Bawks. (The poster formerly known as Boxlock)</p>
<p>    All blow, and no show.</p>
<p>    I wonder which one of them would like to be next to &#8220;prank&#8221; me?</p>
<p>    Oh, and I already know who &#8220;JimJohnson&#8221; is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boxlock20</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474078</link>
		<dc:creator>Boxlock20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474078</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Watch out J.J., BlueJay will challenge you to go meet him in a parking lot somewhere, out in the cold, so he can set you straight....oh shiver and shake!!!&lt;/b&gt;

He did me.  I don&#039;t know what he thought he was going to do, I just let him stand there, ha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Watch out J.J., BlueJay will challenge you to go meet him in a parking lot somewhere, out in the cold, so he can set you straight&#8230;.oh shiver and shake!!!</b></p>
<p>He did me.  I don&#8217;t know what he thought he was going to do, I just let him stand there, ha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueJay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474077</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474077</guid>
		<description>Wanna bag on my kid some more &quot;American way&quot;?

    At least I only need one nic.

   Ya poser you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wanna bag on my kid some more &#8220;American way&#8221;?</p>
<p>    At least I only need one nic.</p>
<p>   Ya poser you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YellowdogLiberal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474076</link>
		<dc:creator>YellowdogLiberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474076</guid>
		<description>And along comes JimJohnson, stinking up the thread, as usual.

  Thanks. Makes it quicker to read by scrolling over anything with your name on it.

Dennis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And along comes JimJohnson, stinking up the thread, as usual.</p>
<p>  Thanks. Makes it quicker to read by scrolling over anything with your name on it.</p>
<p>Dennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American_Way</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474071</link>
		<dc:creator>American_Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474071</guid>
		<description>JJ don&#039;t waste your time posting back to JR. No one else does. Even his own.

He was going to save the world, remember?

Him and his hand-me-down free computer.

Engage discussions with substantial posters. JR is not one of them.


I have to remind myself frequently on same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JJ don&#8217;t waste your time posting back to JR. No one else does. Even his own.</p>
<p>He was going to save the world, remember?</p>
<p>Him and his hand-me-down free computer.</p>
<p>Engage discussions with substantial posters. JR is not one of them.</p>
<p>I have to remind myself frequently on same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimJohnson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474055</link>
		<dc:creator>JimJohnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474055</guid>
		<description>Just can&#039;t stand people who are successful, can you BJ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just can&#8217;t stand people who are successful, can you BJ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueJay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474054</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474054</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Rush could hold his own in a debate. The same is true of the rest of winger radio. THAT is why their callers are carefully choreographed.

    Hannity demonstrates this. O&quot;Reilly too.

    On their TV shows, they are frequently reduced to loud, simple bluster when presented with an opposing voice.

    You can tell Hannity is on the ropes when he pulls out &quot;You&#039;re like a broken record&quot; or &quot;You&#039;re giving us your liberal talking points.&quot;

    With Billo, he  just starts shouting and telling his opponent to &quot;Shut up!&quot;

     The rest of rant radio hosts? They avoid direct confrontation completely except for the handpicked calls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Rush could hold his own in a debate. The same is true of the rest of winger radio. THAT is why their callers are carefully choreographed.</p>
<p>    Hannity demonstrates this. O&#8221;Reilly too.</p>
<p>    On their TV shows, they are frequently reduced to loud, simple bluster when presented with an opposing voice.</p>
<p>    You can tell Hannity is on the ropes when he pulls out &#8220;You&#8217;re like a broken record&#8221; or &#8220;You&#8217;re giving us your liberal talking points.&#8221;</p>
<p>    With Billo, he  just starts shouting and telling his opponent to &#8220;Shut up!&#8221;</p>
<p>     The rest of rant radio hosts? They avoid direct confrontation completely except for the handpicked calls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimJohnson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474053</link>
		<dc:creator>JimJohnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474053</guid>
		<description>BJ, to save the world, by ending Freedom of Speech.

What&#039;s that make BJ?

(besides an a-hole)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BJ, to save the world, by ending Freedom of Speech.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s that make BJ?</p>
<p>(besides an a-hole)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimJohnson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474052</link>
		<dc:creator>JimJohnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474052</guid>
		<description>Only in your twisted lil brain BJ would you see that protecting the right of someone to continue the most popular radio show in America is silencing free speech.

I also support the right of Air America to broadcast on the radio.  Oh, that&#039;s right, they went bankrupt because there weren&#039;t enough listeners who wanted to hear their Lib Bullsiht.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only in your twisted lil brain BJ would you see that protecting the right of someone to continue the most popular radio show in America is silencing free speech.</p>
<p>I also support the right of Air America to broadcast on the radio.  Oh, that&#8217;s right, they went bankrupt because there weren&#8217;t enough listeners who wanted to hear their Lib Bullsiht.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueJay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474046</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474046</guid>
		<description>&quot;we must eliminate Freedom of Speech&quot;

   Rush Limbaugh frequently describes himself as a &quot;benevolent dictator&quot;

    It is those who want to protect the right wing radio monopoly who are silencing free speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;we must eliminate Freedom of Speech&#8221;</p>
<p>   Rush Limbaugh frequently describes himself as a &#8220;benevolent dictator&#8221;</p>
<p>    It is those who want to protect the right wing radio monopoly who are silencing free speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimJohnson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474043</link>
		<dc:creator>JimJohnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474043</guid>
		<description>BlueJay
Posted November 22, 2008 at 6:53 pm &#124; Permalink
Do you see now why we must have a return to the Fairness Doctrine.

Look at poor “ICT.

Obviously this is no man of great means or letters. Yet he is quite clearly a con.

THIS is the damage that unopposed right wing radio does. It convinces people to vote and act, even violently against their own best interest. So sad.

We MUST help people like “ICT”. We must have fair and balance airwaves.
-------------------------------------------------

Yup, the facist BJ/JR says we must eliminate Freedom of Speech, in order to save us from opposing points of view.

ONE MUST ONLY SPEAK OF THE PARTY LINE!

HEIL you FACIST SOB JR!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BlueJay<br />
Posted November 22, 2008 at 6:53 pm | Permalink<br />
Do you see now why we must have a return to the Fairness Doctrine.</p>
<p>Look at poor “ICT.</p>
<p>Obviously this is no man of great means or letters. Yet he is quite clearly a con.</p>
<p>THIS is the damage that unopposed right wing radio does. It convinces people to vote and act, even violently against their own best interest. So sad.</p>
<p>We MUST help people like “ICT”. We must have fair and balance airwaves.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Yup, the facist BJ/JR says we must eliminate Freedom of Speech, in order to save us from opposing points of view.</p>
<p>ONE MUST ONLY SPEAK OF THE PARTY LINE!</p>
<p>HEIL you FACIST SOB JR!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimJohnson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474042</link>
		<dc:creator>JimJohnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474042</guid>
		<description>neocon
Posted November 22, 2008 at 2:36 pm &#124; Permalink
JimJohnson reflects the total ignorance of what seems to be a growing segment of the GOP who are destroying the party and who are easily manipulated by the Drug Addict, Sex Pervert &amp; The Idiot. They try to broad brush everyone as being unpatriotic, dependent on the government, etc. who doesn’t agree with their narrow view of conservatism.
-----------------------------------------------

Neocon obviously is not a conservative.  But at least IT knows what it means to be American. 

Americans love FREEDOM and the right to one&#039;s life, liberty, and property.

Now, when you Leftists Libs advocate taking other peoples income and property and Redistributing to others through your Obama Socialist programs, YOU KNOW DA*N WELL THAT IS UNAMERICAN!

You will not find ONE post where I called someone UnAmerican.

Neocon is bright enough to know that what he and his Lib Leftist Socialist buddies are planning to do - Redistribute Wealth through Socialism IS Anti-American.

Good job Neocon.  You know at least that you are wrong - oh, and Anti-American.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>neocon<br />
Posted November 22, 2008 at 2:36 pm | Permalink<br />
JimJohnson reflects the total ignorance of what seems to be a growing segment of the GOP who are destroying the party and who are easily manipulated by the Drug Addict, Sex Pervert &amp; The Idiot. They try to broad brush everyone as being unpatriotic, dependent on the government, etc. who doesn’t agree with their narrow view of conservatism.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Neocon obviously is not a conservative.  But at least IT knows what it means to be American. </p>
<p>Americans love FREEDOM and the right to one&#8217;s life, liberty, and property.</p>
<p>Now, when you Leftists Libs advocate taking other peoples income and property and Redistributing to others through your Obama Socialist programs, YOU KNOW DA*N WELL THAT IS UNAMERICAN!</p>
<p>You will not find ONE post where I called someone UnAmerican.</p>
<p>Neocon is bright enough to know that what he and his Lib Leftist Socialist buddies are planning to do &#8211; Redistribute Wealth through Socialism IS Anti-American.</p>
<p>Good job Neocon.  You know at least that you are wrong &#8211; oh, and Anti-American.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueJay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474040</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474040</guid>
		<description>&quot;We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.” 

    Why are cons afraid of balanced radio? Is it because they KNOW that many people are convinced by it to vote Republican?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.” </p>
<p>    Why are cons afraid of balanced radio? Is it because they KNOW that many people are convinced by it to vote Republican?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American_Way</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/11/fairness-doctrine-baloney/#comment-474034</link>
		<dc:creator>American_Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=11117#comment-474034</guid>
		<description>&quot;We must have fair and balance airwaves.&quot;

And who will be the judge?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We must have fair and balance airwaves.&#8221;</p>
<p>And who will be the judge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
