Yep, pathetic.

Re: Regular
DNFTT

‘Investigator Discounted Palins’ Fears as Motivation to Seek Removal of a Trooper ‘
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/12/us/politics/12trooper.html?ref=politics

Your sentence should read”…for Zionist Americans…
But even then it would be inaccurate as most dem politicians are just as onboard on the Israel situation as the Repubs.

By the way is anyone concerned about ACORN? What about the strange campaign contributions? What about the voter fraud questions? Gee it sure seems like Sarah Palin is a menace to society.

Defense of Palin: she may have broke a statute or two, but she didn’t break no laws! I guess it’s suddenly spelling that’s important to Palin’s supporters.

I must say, though, that I am saddened by the dilution by this particular former HAZMAT inspector posing (now) as a lawyer to the hippocratic oath taken by former HAZMAT inspectors everywhere. I had higher hopes than this for ‘em all as they branch out to law in addition to their expertise in science and economics.

It’s been a great day for funny here at WEBlog.

A statute IS a law.

“Statute

1 : a law enacted by the legislative branch of a government”

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/statute

Regular must be home-schooled and doesn’t know the difference statue and a statute.

THAT wasn’t smart.

This evening, I am sure she will have her Sarah Palin darts extra sharp.

Make sure to check out Tina Fey out Palining Palin on Saturday Night live.

“cosmos defends cops that taser 10 year olds and makes death threats to other people.”

Re: Regular
DNFTT

Well, here’s a nibble, can’t resist.

That was pathetic even for you.
=========================================
The jawless fish supports people that support cops tasering 10 year olds and making death threats to other people.

“Kansas values” Regular’s goal is to be as pathetic as possible.

Re: Regular
DNFTT

Well, here’s a nibble, can’t resist.

That was pathetic even for you.

Why isnt the Palin’s attorney worthy of an opinion, in your eyes?
—

Who ever said he’s not entitled to his opinion?

The question is this, why in the world would you expect anybody to take the opinion of the defendant’s lawyer ON THE MERITS OF THE CASE?!?

You guys crack me up. You in particular are profoundly untalented at spinning the news for all but a handful of already died in the wool Republics…but like the black knight in Holy Grail you never let a total absence of talent stop you.

PAULSON IS A DEMOCRAT!

That’s the point.

“…the complaints were taken very SERIOUSLY, and a THOROUGH investigation was under way.” Wooten was cleared.

Sarah Palin later abused the power of her office to try to get Wooten fired.

However, most of us Kansas Republicans care more about our country than we do about the strength of the Kansas Republican Party.

Would it be easier to pick off Tiahrt with McCain as President or with Obama as President? Clearly, Tiahrt would have MORE trouble with a McCain Presidency. The Party in power always loses Congressional seats in off-year elections.

However, again, Republicans care more about the country than we do about politics.
—-
Now, Mom
Doesnt the other side get to express its view?
Why isnt the Palin’s attorney worthy of an opinion, in your eyes?

Cosmos
And the “irony” you speak of is?
Very clearly, the facts were that the law prevented law enforcement agencies from giving much of any feedback, to the Palin family.
Even Branchflower admits that the Palins had just cause to be frustrated by the complaint process.
————-

Again,
“The irony is that the complaints were taken very SERIOUSLY, and a THOROUGH investigation was under way.”

And what could a private citizen do if she was “frustrated by the complaint process”?

Ohh! I know! I know! She could be elected governor, and then she and her husband could abuse the power of her office, to try to get her ex-brother-in-law FIRED!.

To be fair to the “frustrated” private citizens who are not governors, maybe we should give them the same powers as the governors?

Republicans were in control of Congress from 1994 to 2000 and in total control of Congress and the White House from 2000 to 2006.

And what did they do with that power? Well, let’s see:

1) We are still bogged down in Iraq.
2) Bush is threatening to invade Iran.
3) North Korea got their nuclear weapons.
4) We are still dependent on foreign oil.
5) We owe China 500 billion dollars and counting.
6) Our economy is on the brink of collapsing.
7) Our status of superpower is in question.
8) The respect of our allies is still hurting because of Bush and Cheney’s ‘my way or no way’ attitude.

And the only thing we hear from the Republicans is how bad Obama is?

Please, Republicans, give us a break and stop embarrassing yourselves.

– Thomas Van Flein, lawyer for Sarah and Todd Palin

–

Are you seriously trying to use Palins’ lawyer as facts in this case? Get real. Their lawyer is a paid shill – and you know alot about that profile – don’t you?

Todd Palin had way too much access to the governor’s office and no one on her staff had the nerve to tell him to shut up?

Sarah Palin’s emails were not turned over – why not? Maybe the smoking gun is in those emails – huh?