<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is it all about Palin in 2012?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:40:26 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cosmos_originally</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-440281</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmos_originally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 03:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-440281</guid>
		<description>The point is not how many VPs became president in the past.

The point is whether someone campaigning for VP is qualified to be the president, if it&#039;s required.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point is not how many VPs became president in the past.</p>
<p>The point is whether someone campaigning for VP is qualified to be the president, if it&#8217;s required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-440279</link>
		<dc:creator>American</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 03:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-440279</guid>
		<description>Question!

How many vice presidents have become president?

14

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/campaigns/junkie/archive/table080798.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question!</p>
<p>How many vice presidents have become president?</p>
<p>14</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/campaigns/junkie/archive/table080798.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/campaigns/junkie/archive/table080798.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-440148</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 18:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-440148</guid>
		<description>Kandipoo,
&quot;Sounds good but if obama of the muslim faith gets in the US will never have another President. Between him and the anti American liberal media America will be dead. It will be mad max to the max. Chaos and destruction. So long America RIP.&quot;

Translation: He isn&#039;t pure white and he isn&#039;t KKK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kandipoo,<br />
&#8220;Sounds good but if obama of the muslim faith gets in the US will never have another President. Between him and the anti American liberal media America will be dead. It will be mad max to the max. Chaos and destruction. So long America RIP.&#8221;</p>
<p>Translation: He isn&#8217;t pure white and he isn&#8217;t KKK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regular</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-439883</link>
		<dc:creator>Regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 10:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-439883</guid>
		<description>#
Monkeyhawk
Posted October 5, 2008 at 4:23 am &#124; Permalink

“Regular” tries –

“Palin isn’t qualified to do what?

Preside over the Senate like all Vice Presidents do in case of a tie?”

Talk about lowering the bar.

You know, and everyone knows, John S (for Senile) McCain the Third (for Shrub’s 3rd term) is likely gonna die in the next couple of years.

That puts the Moose-Dresser in the Oval Office.

Think about that.
--------------------
You know this how?

He has longevity in his family.  His mother was at the Republican National Convention, lucid and alert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#<br />
Monkeyhawk<br />
Posted October 5, 2008 at 4:23 am | Permalink</p>
<p>“Regular” tries –</p>
<p>“Palin isn’t qualified to do what?</p>
<p>Preside over the Senate like all Vice Presidents do in case of a tie?”</p>
<p>Talk about lowering the bar.</p>
<p>You know, and everyone knows, John S (for Senile) McCain the Third (for Shrub’s 3rd term) is likely gonna die in the next couple of years.</p>
<p>That puts the Moose-Dresser in the Oval Office.</p>
<p>Think about that.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
You know this how?</p>
<p>He has longevity in his family.  His mother was at the Republican National Convention, lucid and alert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monkeyhawk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-439882</link>
		<dc:creator>Monkeyhawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 09:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-439882</guid>
		<description>&quot;Regular&quot; tries --

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Palin isn’t qualified to do what?

Preside over the Senate like all Vice Presidents do in case of a tie?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Talk about lowering the bar.

You know, and everyone knows, John S (for Senile) McCain the Third (for Shrub&#039;s 3rd term) is likely gonna die in the next couple of years.

That puts the Moose-Dresser in the Oval Office.

Think about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Regular&#8221; tries &#8211;</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Palin isn’t qualified to do what?</p>
<p>Preside over the Senate like all Vice Presidents do in case of a tie?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Talk about lowering the bar.</p>
<p>You know, and everyone knows, John S (for Senile) McCain the Third (for Shrub&#8217;s 3rd term) is likely gonna die in the next couple of years.</p>
<p>That puts the Moose-Dresser in the Oval Office.</p>
<p>Think about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Predestined</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-439879</link>
		<dc:creator>Predestined</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 08:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-439879</guid>
		<description>“Obama spokesman Bill Burton said the campaign purchased the books from Random House under a special arrangement in which the senator did not receive royalties for the sales.”

This type of thing is done, too, and would be the same as when an author is usually offered a discounted price on books bought directly from the publisher.  There are no royalty payments made for the purchase of those books.  As the author, I am offered my book for 1/2 of the cover price.  I am not allowed to re-sell those books.  They are &quot;promotional material&quot; and therefore are considered a business deduction.  It would work the same way if an agreement was reached between the publisher and the campaign.  It&#039;s promotional material, no matter who does the promoting and is a legitimate deduction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Obama spokesman Bill Burton said the campaign purchased the books from Random House under a special arrangement in which the senator did not receive royalties for the sales.”</p>
<p>This type of thing is done, too, and would be the same as when an author is usually offered a discounted price on books bought directly from the publisher.  There are no royalty payments made for the purchase of those books.  As the author, I am offered my book for 1/2 of the cover price.  I am not allowed to re-sell those books.  They are &#8220;promotional material&#8221; and therefore are considered a business deduction.  It would work the same way if an agreement was reached between the publisher and the campaign.  It&#8217;s promotional material, no matter who does the promoting and is a legitimate deduction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regular</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-439878</link>
		<dc:creator>Regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 07:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-439878</guid>
		<description>#
cosmos_originally
Posted October 5, 2008 at 12:33 am &#124; Permalink

From header:

“The over-the-moon reaction by conservative commentators and activists to Sarah Palin’s debate performance puzzled me - until I came up with a hypothesis to explain the phenomenon,” Eugene Robinson wrote in a Washington Post blog.”
—————

Occam’s razor is “often paraphrased as, “All other things being equal, the simplest solution is the best.” “(Wikipedia)

McCain is dropping in the polls, quitting Michigan, etc.

Palin helped the ticket for a short time, until voters realized that she wasn’t qualified, and her polls #’s started to drop.

The “over-the-moon reaction[s]” were most likely just a futile attempt to help the flailing McCain/Palin ticket.
------------------------
Palin isn&#039;t qualified to do what?

Preside over the Senate like all Vice Presidents do in case of a tie?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#<br />
cosmos_originally<br />
Posted October 5, 2008 at 12:33 am | Permalink</p>
<p>From header:</p>
<p>“The over-the-moon reaction by conservative commentators and activists to Sarah Palin’s debate performance puzzled me &#8211; until I came up with a hypothesis to explain the phenomenon,” Eugene Robinson wrote in a Washington Post blog.”<br />
—————</p>
<p>Occam’s razor is “often paraphrased as, “All other things being equal, the simplest solution is the best.” “(Wikipedia)</p>
<p>McCain is dropping in the polls, quitting Michigan, etc.</p>
<p>Palin helped the ticket for a short time, until voters realized that she wasn’t qualified, and her polls #’s started to drop.</p>
<p>The “over-the-moon reaction[s]” were most likely just a futile attempt to help the flailing McCain/Palin ticket.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Palin isn&#8217;t qualified to do what?</p>
<p>Preside over the Senate like all Vice Presidents do in case of a tie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmos_originally</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-439871</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmos_originally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 05:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-439871</guid>
		<description>From header:

“The over-the-moon reaction by conservative commentators and activists to Sarah Palin’s debate performance puzzled me - until I came up with a hypothesis to explain the phenomenon,” Eugene Robinson wrote in a Washington Post blog.&quot;
---------------

Occam&#039;s razor is &quot;often paraphrased as, &quot;All other things being equal, the simplest solution is the best.&quot; &quot;(Wikipedia)

McCain is dropping in the polls, quitting Michigan, etc.

Palin helped the ticket for a short time, until voters realized that she wasn&#039;t qualified, and her polls #&#039;s started to drop.

The &quot;over-the-moon reaction[s]&quot; were most likely just a futile attempt to help the flailing McCain/Palin ticket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From header:</p>
<p>“The over-the-moon reaction by conservative commentators and activists to Sarah Palin’s debate performance puzzled me &#8211; until I came up with a hypothesis to explain the phenomenon,” Eugene Robinson wrote in a Washington Post blog.&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Occam&#8217;s razor is &#8220;often paraphrased as, &#8220;All other things being equal, the simplest solution is the best.&#8221; &#8220;(Wikipedia)</p>
<p>McCain is dropping in the polls, quitting Michigan, etc.</p>
<p>Palin helped the ticket for a short time, until voters realized that she wasn&#8217;t qualified, and her polls #&#8217;s started to drop.</p>
<p>The &#8220;over-the-moon reaction[s]&#8221; were most likely just a futile attempt to help the flailing McCain/Palin ticket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Royall</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-439866</link>
		<dc:creator>Royall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 05:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-439866</guid>
		<description>From Saturday&#039;s NY Times article about Ayers:

&quot;I saw no evidence of a radical streak, either overt or covert, when we were together at Harvard Law School,&quot; said Bradford A. Berenson, who worked on the Harvard Law Review with Mr. Obama and who served as associate White House counsel under President Bush.  Mr. Berenson, who is backing Mr. McCain, described his fellow student as &quot;a pragmatic liberal&quot; whose moderation frustrated others at the law review whose views were much farther to the left.  

(From page A14, under the subtitle, &quot;Little Influence Seen.&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Saturday&#8217;s NY Times article about Ayers:</p>
<p>&#8220;I saw no evidence of a radical streak, either overt or covert, when we were together at Harvard Law School,&#8221; said Bradford A. Berenson, who worked on the Harvard Law Review with Mr. Obama and who served as associate White House counsel under President Bush.  Mr. Berenson, who is backing Mr. McCain, described his fellow student as &#8220;a pragmatic liberal&#8221; whose moderation frustrated others at the law review whose views were much farther to the left.  </p>
<p>(From page A14, under the subtitle, &#8220;Little Influence Seen.&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmos_originally</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-439864</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmos_originally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-439864</guid>
		<description>JMWalker posted October 4, 2008 at 10:12 pm

It has happened: Palin brought up the Ayres/Obama connection during a stop. 
--------------

What&#039;s pathetic is that the U.S. has a VP candidate (and possible president) who &lt;b&gt;uses&lt;/b&gt; a headline, and does NOT even read the article.

Or else Sarah Palin read the article, and then LIED about it?

‘Palin: Obama Is ‘Palling Around With Terrorists’
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/04/palin-obama-is-palling-around-with-terrorists
“Hari Sevugan, a spokesman for the Obama campaign, fired back almost immediately in a statement: “Governor Palin’s comments, while offensive, are not surprising, given the McCain campaign’s statement this morning that they would be launching Swiftboat-like attacks in hopes of deflecting attention from the nation’s economic ills.

In fact, the very newspaper story Governor Palin &lt;b&gt;cited&lt;/b&gt; in hurling her shameless attack made clear that Senator Obama is &lt;b&gt;not&lt;/b&gt; close to Bill Ayers, &lt;b&gt;much less ‘pals,’ and that he has strongly condemned the despicable acts Ayers committed 40 years ago, when Obama was eight&lt;/b&gt;. What’s clear is that John McCain and Sarah Palin would rather spend their time tearing down Barack Obama than laying out a plan to build up our economy.” ”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JMWalker posted October 4, 2008 at 10:12 pm</p>
<p>It has happened: Palin brought up the Ayres/Obama connection during a stop.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>What&#8217;s pathetic is that the U.S. has a VP candidate (and possible president) who <b>uses</b> a headline, and does NOT even read the article.</p>
<p>Or else Sarah Palin read the article, and then LIED about it?</p>
<p>‘Palin: Obama Is ‘Palling Around With Terrorists’<br />
<a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/04/palin-obama-is-palling-around-with-terrorists" rel="nofollow">http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/04/palin-obama-is-palling-around-with-terrorists</a><br />
“Hari Sevugan, a spokesman for the Obama campaign, fired back almost immediately in a statement: “Governor Palin’s comments, while offensive, are not surprising, given the McCain campaign’s statement this morning that they would be launching Swiftboat-like attacks in hopes of deflecting attention from the nation’s economic ills.</p>
<p>In fact, the very newspaper story Governor Palin <b>cited</b> in hurling her shameless attack made clear that Senator Obama is <b>not</b> close to Bill Ayers, <b>much less ‘pals,’ and that he has strongly condemned the despicable acts Ayers committed 40 years ago, when Obama was eight</b>. What’s clear is that John McCain and Sarah Palin would rather spend their time tearing down Barack Obama than laying out a plan to build up our economy.” ”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Royall</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-439863</link>
		<dc:creator>Royall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-439863</guid>
		<description>If Palin and her unstable sidekick of a running mate truly want to get smart and push the issue with Obama&#039;s associations, then the Alaska Governor can plan on getting more than a few opportunities to string a series of incomplete sentences together about her husband&#039;s membership in the Alaska Independence Party.  That little stint in political activisim reportedly lasted, with an interval or two, from 1995 to 2002.  Patriotism? Well, not exactly.  This crew of frontier folk apparently want to chuck membership in the good old U. S. of A. altogether.  Another way of stating it is that they&#039;d actually like to secede from the union.  Yeah, just your basic get together over beer and moose chili.  So the second Palin and McCain start flinging the Chicago talk around, rest assured that a whole posse of us are going to be out here filling in the gaps on the vice presidential nominee&#039;s rendezvous with the anti-America crowd from the upper northwest.  Black is white, up is down, and we will see who&#039;s smart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Palin and her unstable sidekick of a running mate truly want to get smart and push the issue with Obama&#8217;s associations, then the Alaska Governor can plan on getting more than a few opportunities to string a series of incomplete sentences together about her husband&#8217;s membership in the Alaska Independence Party.  That little stint in political activisim reportedly lasted, with an interval or two, from 1995 to 2002.  Patriotism? Well, not exactly.  This crew of frontier folk apparently want to chuck membership in the good old U. S. of A. altogether.  Another way of stating it is that they&#8217;d actually like to secede from the union.  Yeah, just your basic get together over beer and moose chili.  So the second Palin and McCain start flinging the Chicago talk around, rest assured that a whole posse of us are going to be out here filling in the gaps on the vice presidential nominee&#8217;s rendezvous with the anti-America crowd from the upper northwest.  Black is white, up is down, and we will see who&#8217;s smart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueJay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-439861</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-439861</guid>
		<description>Heh

   SNL&#039;s take on lowered expectations.

    &quot;Unless Governor Palin faints, cries, runs from the stage, or vomits, she will be seen as having achieved a tie in this debate.&quot;

    Too true!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh</p>
<p>   SNL&#8217;s take on lowered expectations.</p>
<p>    &#8220;Unless Governor Palin faints, cries, runs from the stage, or vomits, she will be seen as having achieved a tie in this debate.&#8221;</p>
<p>    Too true!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-439859</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-439859</guid>
		<description>From  the  deep  South   &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;

http://www.newsherald.com/news/marianna_68566___article.html/racial_slur.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From  the  deep  South   &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newsherald.com/news/marianna_68566___article.html/racial_slur.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsherald.com/news/marianna_68566___article.html/racial_slur.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueJay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-439858</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-439858</guid>
		<description>Give Tina Fey an Emmy AND a Pulitzer.

    She outPalin&#039;s Palin.

     Yes, I do think Palin is destined to become a verb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give Tina Fey an Emmy AND a Pulitzer.</p>
<p>    She outPalin&#8217;s Palin.</p>
<p>     Yes, I do think Palin is destined to become a verb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-439857</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-439857</guid>
		<description>Cheer up  fellow  Libs....   It  could be  worse...  We  could  be in  the  Deep  South</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheer up  fellow  Libs&#8230;.   It  could be  worse&#8230;  We  could  be in  the  Deep  South</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phantom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-439856</link>
		<dc:creator>Phantom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-439856</guid>
		<description>Next mccain ad will be claiming Obama&#039;s paying SNL, and Tina Fey is an Operative!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next mccain ad will be claiming Obama&#8217;s paying SNL, and Tina Fey is an Operative!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-439855</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-439855</guid>
		<description>Phantom,  its  about  time,  dont ya  think???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phantom,  its  about  time,  dont ya  think???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-439854</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-439854</guid>
		<description>Hey  Monkey,   when  they  put it on  You Tube,  please  post  a  link??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey  Monkey,   when  they  put it on  You Tube,  please  post  a  link??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phantom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-439853</link>
		<dc:creator>Phantom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-439853</guid>
		<description>SNL skit was great, may be the best one! Had me laughing. Bet Sarah&#039;s ratings are going down some more tonight, and SNL&#039;s is going up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SNL skit was great, may be the best one! Had me laughing. Bet Sarah&#8217;s ratings are going down some more tonight, and SNL&#8217;s is going up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-439852</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-439852</guid>
		<description>Nathaniel
Posted October 4, 2008 at 8:52 pm &#124; Permalink
Chas,

My link is not fake! Rick Astley did indeed make a music video on the song “Never Gonna Give You Up”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rick_Astley
==========================================

Your  link  was  titled  with  reference  to comments  &quot;supposedly&quot;  made  by  Michele  Obama...   It  wasnt  even  close...  

THEREFORE,  oh  ye  of  small  mental  capacity,  the  LINK  is  FAKE!!

And,  ummmm,   I  already  posted  earlier  about  the  song,  and  where it  was  recorded,  and  when....   Or  did you  miss  that???  

Damn  mental  midgets....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathaniel<br />
Posted October 4, 2008 at 8:52 pm | Permalink<br />
Chas,</p>
<p>My link is not fake! Rick Astley did indeed make a music video on the song “Never Gonna Give You Up”</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rick_Astley" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rick_Astley</a><br />
==========================================</p>
<p>Your  link  was  titled  with  reference  to comments  &#8220;supposedly&#8221;  made  by  Michele  Obama&#8230;   It  wasnt  even  close&#8230;  </p>
<p>THEREFORE,  oh  ye  of  small  mental  capacity,  the  LINK  is  FAKE!!</p>
<p>And,  ummmm,   I  already  posted  earlier  about  the  song,  and  where it  was  recorded,  and  when&#8230;.   Or  did you  miss  that???  </p>
<p>Damn  mental  midgets&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monkeyhawk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-439851</link>
		<dc:creator>Monkeyhawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-439851</guid>
		<description>Tina Fey just nailed the Moose-Dresser.

There were shots at Biden, tool

But Bible Spice just got pwned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tina Fey just nailed the Moose-Dresser.</p>
<p>There were shots at Biden, tool</p>
<p>But Bible Spice just got pwned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueJay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-439849</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-439849</guid>
		<description>Palin COULD have a political future. She does reach a certain fringe constituency.

   Now I owe her and that constituency no favors for sure. But I don&#039;t like seeing anyone badly used.

    McCain has no political future. This is his last throw. Palin might think carefully (if she can) before she reduces herself to the role of tool for a fading candidate&#039;s last stand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palin COULD have a political future. She does reach a certain fringe constituency.</p>
<p>   Now I owe her and that constituency no favors for sure. But I don&#8217;t like seeing anyone badly used.</p>
<p>    McCain has no political future. This is his last throw. Palin might think carefully (if she can) before she reduces herself to the role of tool for a fading candidate&#8217;s last stand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-439845</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-439845</guid>
		<description>And wearing what seems to be tattooed-on &quot;lipstick&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And wearing what seems to be tattooed-on &#8220;lipstick&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phantom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-439844</link>
		<dc:creator>Phantom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-439844</guid>
		<description>Mccain did get a little bumb when he went neg., then he went to far and got humiliated by the press, figuring he has nothing to lose, he&#039;s ready to bring it on again.
Obama just needs to keep on keeping on, and denounce every new smear.
Palin will soon be seen as the vengeful bitch she is, wearing lipstick, and mascara.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mccain did get a little bumb when he went neg., then he went to far and got humiliated by the press, figuring he has nothing to lose, he&#8217;s ready to bring it on again.<br />
Obama just needs to keep on keeping on, and denounce every new smear.<br />
Palin will soon be seen as the vengeful bitch she is, wearing lipstick, and mascara.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMWalker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/10/is-it-all-about-palin-in-2012/#comment-439843</link>
		<dc:creator>JMWalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=10343#comment-439843</guid>
		<description>It has happened: Palin brought up the Ayres/Obama connection during a stop. I expect the Muslim connection next. McCain&#039;s running scared, and he&#039;ll stop at nothing to lie about Obama. Can&#039;t beat em with facts, attack em with BS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has happened: Palin brought up the Ayres/Obama connection during a stop. I expect the Muslim connection next. McCain&#8217;s running scared, and he&#8217;ll stop at nothing to lie about Obama. Can&#8217;t beat em with facts, attack em with BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
