If you haven’t seen it yet — or even if you have — be sure to watch Tina Fey imitating Sarah Palin on “Saturday Night Live.”
Registered?
Commenting on WE Blog now requires you to be a Kansas.com member. Use the links above to register, if you haven't already, or to log in.Contact us
Follow us
Daily Archives
-
Recent Comments
- Pleefer on Open thread 11/22
- cosmos_originally on Open thread 11/22
- Phantom on Open thread 11/22
- Phantom on Open thread 11/22
- Rage on Open thread 11/22
- Pleefer on Open thread 11/22
- Pleefer on Open thread 11/22
- cosmos_originally on Open thread 11/22
- Rage on Open thread 11/22
- Rage on Open thread 11/22
60 Comments
I saw this on Saturday night live, she sure looked and acted like Sarah Palin.
heh heh,
Talented actors, that was funny.
She nailed the Palin caricature.
It’s still funny no matter how many times I’ve watched! We all could use more laughs!
WOOF! WOOF! WOOF! WHO LET THE DOGS OUT? WOOF! WOOF! WOOF!
2 Palin Posts A Day Every Day!
Welcome to the WE Blog Attack Dog!
The continuous, redundant, slanderous attacks will continue. Repeat the same lies over and over, and idiots will think they are true!
WOOF!
WOOF!
WOOF!
WHO LET THE DOGS OUT?
WOOF!
WOOF!
WOOF!
2 Palin Posts A Day Every Day!
Welcome to the WE Blog Attack Dog!
The continuous, redundant, slanderous attacks will continue. Repeat the same lies over and over, and idiots will think they are true!!
I quit watching Saturday Night Live quite some time ago but I think that this was hilarious. They both portrayed them well and they put a lot of humor into it. What’s amazing was it was funny without being hateful and that is what made it so good. It would be nice if a lot of people could laugh at themselves just as they laugh at others. I was able to laugh at the jokes about Palin just as much as the ones about Clinton. It was done in good taste.
Except for Bush, never has the press attacked a candidate more then Palin.
This is an unprecedented attack in scope and repetitiveness.
Never before, as the press gave a rats ass about the VP!
Who let the dogs out???
The dog wears lipstick, Mccain let her out.
Could it be you, Max?
Every comment on this thread with the exception of yours are positive, happy comments. No matter what the political persuasion we all laughed and had a bit of fun — EXCEPT YOU. Why do you think you have such a problem, such a dour mood? Did you not sleep well? Do you need a jug?
That last word was a typo. I meant hug, not jug.
Sometimes typos are funny.
I’ve NEVER seen the WEBlog post 2 Topics per Day Every Day on ANYONE ELSE, until now.
The WE Blog Truly Fears Palin!!!!!
PALIN!
PALIN!!
PALIN!!!
Don’t you get tired of redundant posts every day with the same attacks on the same person?
I hate redundant posts, don’t you?
Redundant posts are well, redundant…..
Yup, I could use a jug!
Aw come on….(to borrow Obama’s favorite argument) Linda, I have a sense of humor, don’t you?
Why do you think I posted the same thing, same thing, same thing over, and over?
And over?
To make a point…
a point.
Redundant attacks on Palin are pathetic.
And you know what? These attacks will backfire. No one likes to see a gang pile on someone who doesn’t deserve it.
So, I guess I’ll quit complaining about the redundancy, redundancy, redundancy.
Keep it up Eagle!
Keep it up Eagle!
Dang it!
Now I’m I’m st st starting to stutter when I t t talk t t too!
And I keep asking about the Tiahrt Amendment for the same reason.
6 or 7 times this year, the Eagle has slammed the Tiarht Amendment, with no basis in fact.
But carry on with the redundant lies.
And when I feel like it, I’ll carry on with the redundant replies.
Phantom
Posted September 15, 2008 at 2:36 pm | Permalink
The dog wears lipstick, Mccain let her out.
===================================================================
The Dailykos and Michael Moore have called out the dogs to attack Palin.
Phantom’s post is in line with party orders.
#
MaxGrobnik
Posted September 15, 2008 at 2:28 pm | Permalink
WOOF! WOOF! WOOF! WHO LET THE DOGS OUT? WOOF! WOOF! WOOF!
2 Palin Posts A Day Every Day!
Welcome to the WE Blog Attack Dog!
The continuous, redundant, slanderous attacks will continue. Repeat the same lies over and over, and idiots will think they are true!
#
MaxGrobnik
Posted September 15, 2008 at 2:29 pm | Permalink
WOOF!
WOOF!
WOOF!
WHO LET THE DOGS OUT?
WOOF!
WOOF!
WOOF!
2 Palin Posts A Day Every Day!
Welcome to the WE Blog Attack Dog!
The continuous, redundant…
Yeah.
Like you’re the one to carp about redundancy.
Wait…….SNL is still on TV?
Palin is the joke.
How do you feel about redundant campaign speeches?
Didn’t they do a pretty good skewer of Hillary too?
Carp?
No thanks Monkey. I’ll save that for you.
I don’t like stuff that smells like crap.
Phantom
Posted September 15, 2008 at 3:11 pm | Permalink
How do you feel about redundant campaign speeches?
========================================================
Like:
Hope
Change
Hope
Change
Hope
Change
Hope
Change
Hope
Change
Hope
Change
Hope
Change
Hope
Change
Hope
Change
Redundant Beer,
now that is a good thing.
You know Max was drafted, don’t you? She didn’t come here voluntarily. That’s why she gets to complain so redundantly. If she really had a choice, she would just stay away from such a boring, redundant blog.
Collin Powell said today he still doesn’t know who he’s going to vote for, but we need to move beyond this lipstick on a pig nonsense and elevate the issues facing the country and who can best lead it.
Mccain change, change, Real Change. Changed from experience to change, now that’s a Real Change.
Chevy chase said the Hillary part detracted from the skit, but I wouldn’t agree, except much more material could’ve been added.
Palin Bridge, oil, Gobn, nothing.
MaxGrobnik
Posted September 15, 2008 at 2:29 pm | Permalink
WOOF!
WOOF!
WOOF!
WHO LET THE DOGS OUT?
WOOF!
WOOF!
WOOF!
====================================================
Having a problem, as alpha beeyatch, keeping them doggies in, Max? Maybe you should “service” them a bit more often.
Tina makes more sense than Palin.
Let me ask, please, have we ever elected a “nothing” man?
I’m serious here.
I’m looking at a financial crisis I haven’t seen in my 60+ years. Two wars. Testosterone gone amuck and maybe ready to start several more wars. Corruption that is so rampant we have forgotten more than we remember. The newest bright and shiny objects have attracted us away from the ones before.
I am seriously pi**ed. And it just happens that I am ONE from the largest voting block — females. Think about it, guys. There is no larger voting block than females. Do you really want ALL of us seriously pi**ed?
Is it even possible for you gentlemen to realize that behind the scenes women are always there. Think hard about the women your life — Mom, wife, daughters, sisters… Are there some strong ones? Are there soem who have made a difference?
Maybe it’s time for all women have done behind the scenes to come out of hiding. Maybe Sarah Palin is the place to start. Does anyone here think if she spends the next four years as vice president that she won’t run for president in 2012? Does anyone think the Democratic Party won’t field a female candidate also?
I think you boys better be ready for some really big changes. Bigger changes than you’ve even seriously thought about.
I know everyone is really excited over Sarah Palin — some negatively, others positively. But I think the males haven’t really realized what the future holds.
I’m not concerned over the sex, or race of the candidate, just the competence, and religious beliefs insofar as they impact policy. Worries me that someone would consult their preacher on guidane to every day matters.
My son & I watched the video and he said that they poked more fun at Hillary than they did Palin. That I noticed too. I told him for one thing, everyone has known Hillary for a long time and Palin for only a few weeks so there is a lot more to joke about on Hillary. I thought she did Hillary really well. Of course, if we all want to be honest this is just a skit, not reality. They over exaggerated the personalities, that is what made it so funny.
Yes, STOP, STOP, STOP picking on poor Sara. Pick on somebody who is up to it. Shame on you, you big meannies.
I’m pretty sure Max has crossed the line from being an avid commenter to being an annoying spammer. I don’t care who you support, you’re a jerk and an annoyance.
Linda -
I too have a vagina. Said body part does not automatically mean I’m voting for McCain-Palin. I’m not a dude, my reproductive organs don’t do the thinking for me (kidding, gents). The glass ceiling shouldn’t be shattered just to be shattered. It should be broken because the candidate is capable and intelligent – the best possible candidate winning because of her merits. Palin is not that candidate. Not as VP not as president.
“Think hard about the women your life — Mom, wife, daughters, sisters… Are there some strong ones?”
In PaulTheShrillShill’s world they are all shrews.
DeepAsAPlate, I respect your words (more than you’ll know!). But do you think the people supporting Palin should look at what breaking that glass ceiling may mean? I know you understand, I think some don’t.
DumbAsAPlate,
Palin seems to have done just fine so far and is still doing fine. She’s got those DimLibs shaking, and scrambling to try and bring her down, the jackals that they are.
If Palin breaks the glass ceiling, watch out below, she’ll bleed the country.
Who let the Grobnik out?
Lots of women have vaginas, but few have the hallowed b.s. (or more likely) b.a. in communications, fewer still have been mayor of a podunk town in Alaska, and propelled into the Governorship, then catapulted into the v.p. candidate slot. Sounds like a Cinderella story. Even if Cinderella’s true nature is more like the mean stepmother.
Mccain dream woman for the ticket, a c#nt,that can hunt!
I wonder if John McCain, in his ever-so-sincere quest to shatter the glass ceiling for women, gave any thought to Olympia Snowe for the VP slot. For one thing, she’s experienced. She was first elected to Congress in ‘73. She has been a Senator from Maine since ‘94. She has been on several committees, including, I believe, the Select Committee on Intelligence. She is a level-headed politician who knows the game and knows her business. Her approval rating in Maine has generally been quite good.
So why would McCain pass her by? Without question, had he selected her, the qualifications questions would not have been raised. It’s generally understood that Snowe is a person who can be relied upon in Washington.
In addition, if McCain truly wanted to entice Hillary Clinton’s supporters, then Snowe is a better fit. She is much more moderate on social issues than Sarah Palin…oh, gee, have I hit on something, here?
Maybe the evangelical base would not have been quite so excited about Snowe, hey? The moderate viewpoint, as it were, is on the outs in the Republican party, and has been for some time now.
Or maybe Olympia Snowe would have brought a genuine, persuasive, political point-of-view to the negotiating table. Maybe she can be too…forceful or uncompromising (wow, almost like a real maverick instead of a fraudulent one).
Maybe Olympia Snowe is too morally centered of a person to agree to run the kind of race-baiting, mendacious campaign that McCain has opened up.
Are the neocons looking for such a thing in a woman candidate? Well, I have my doubts.
The other thing about Sarah Palin is that she’s younger and, well…never mind.
Maybe she’s too much for boeing getting the tanker contract, and would’ve clashed with mccain on it.
Phantom,
I hadn’t thought of that one. Excellent point! By all means, publicize it!
“Lots of women have vaginas…”
———
Really? You gotta look out for those who don’t! Truth is, you gotta look out for those who do, those who don’t, those who maybe do but you can’t tell for sure.
giggle
Brand Palin had appeal to many market segments. The RW whackos, right to bear arms fanatics, hunters/sportsmen, women, drill here nuts, and of couse some women.
It’s all marketing.
She’s got those DimLibs shaking,
Actually, no. I’m not scared of Sarah Palin, but I am disgusted with McCain choosing her. Why? He chose her for all the wrong reasons. Royall is correct. Olympia Snowe would have been a better choice, by far, and she isn’t the only one. There are several females in the senate and other political areas who are knowledgeable, with much better credentials and education.
and scrambling to try and bring her down, the jackals that they are.
She’s doing a good job of bringing herself down.
Women aren’t as stupid as some of you men would like to think. Many of you are defending her for the same wrong reasons McCain chose her. Oh, yes, and that you think she’s a hottie. Nothing but a bunch of male chauvanist pigs…without lipstick. Or maybe with?
Tina Fey NAILED Palin, just as I knew she would.
Heh
Hillary “I won’t continue the bush doctrine.”
lil Sarah “I don’t know what that is.”
“I can see Russia from my house!”
That one isn’t even made up. Palin actually said it.
Tear her up Tina!
I thought it was a great parody.
They’ve always nailed Hillary to a tee, if not in look in what’s really going on in her mind. LOL
Typical parody of a Republican candidate however.
Don’t have anything? Make them stupid.
Other than being too skinny, she makes a perfect Mrs. Palin. The northern accent was perfect.
WOW, Max gets really mad when the liberals use con tactics!
I guess you should’nt had started it Max!
GOOD point of how Sarah Palin is attempting to use the progress that Senator Clinton made.
Fey(Palin) “We don’t agree on everything.”
Poehler(Clinton) “Anything.”
Words from up north on Palin:
http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/09/14/alaska-women-reject-palin-rally-is-huge/
Say EAGLE, can we get ANOTHER Topic on Sarah tomorrow?
Please!
“WOOF! WOOF! WOOF! WHO LET THE DOGS OUT? WOOF! WOOF! WOOF!
“2 Palin Posts A Day Every Day!
“Welcome to the WE Blog Attack Dog!
“The continuous, redundant, slanderous attacks will continue. Repeat the same lies over and over, and idiots will think they are true!”
So says the WEBlog’s version of Sir Spamalot.
Troll.
Talk about jumping the shark. The McCain had a decent, politically speaking, strategy going with trying to poison the well with the media.
But you know, there is such a thing as trying to go to the poison well too often.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26743182
[FE]Yeah, that’s a good idea. You accuse two women, Tina Fey and Amy Poehler, of being sexist because you think those women, one of whom was the former head writer of SNL, were making fun of your candidate while elevating another woman in politics. Brilliant! That will definitely be taken seriously.[/FE]
In fact, that’s like jumping the shark and nuking the fridge all in one.