Daily Archives: Sept. 25, 2008

With deal near, let debate go on

If a deal on the Wall Street bailout truly is at hand, John McCain’s call to delay Friday’s first presidential debate should be moot. It’s time that McCain and Barack Obama faced off, not just for the 18 percent of undecided voters but for the country. But there has been much speculation about McCain’s motives. David Letterman (in photo with McCain from April) exhaustively chided the candidate on Wednesday’s “Late Show” for putting his campaign on hold to focus on the financial crisis, especially because McCain canceled Letterman but did an interview with CBS News’ Katie Couric. “You’re a fourth term senator from Arizona. You handle what you need to handle. Don’t suspend your campaign. You let your campaign go on, shouldered by your vice presidential nominee,” Letterman said.

McCain’s impulsiveness showing

Columnist George Will sees a bit of Lewis Carroll in John McCain’s apparently unfounded call for the head of Chris Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, over the financial debacle. Will wrote: “For McCain, politics is always operatic, pitting people who agree with him against those who are ‘corrupt’ or ‘betray the public’s trust,’ two categories that seem to be exhaustive — there are no other people.” Will frets about McCain as president: “It is arguable that McCain, because of his boiling moralism and bottomless reservoir of certitudes, is not suited to the presidency. (Barack Obama’s) unreadiness can be corrected, although perhaps at great cost, by experience. Can a dismaying temperament be fixed?”

Open thread 9/25

Pro/con on Obama’s education ideas

Barack Obama believes that top-down government regulation is strangling innovation inside schools. For him, Washington’s role should focus on setting good learning standards, tracking student progress and helping states recruit a stronger teaching force. Obama wisely proposes attacking structural constraints that keep highly qualified college graduates from pursuing careers as teachers and spurring a mixed market of diverse schools. Obama emphasizes the phrase “responsible charter schools” to underscore the fact that unregulated, fly-by-night charter schools in states like Arizona have failed and closed, leaving children and parents in the lurch. Obama has amplified his pitch to expand preschools that include working with parents to improve early literacy practices. He said that he would rely heavily on churches and other community groups to run new preschools in order to avoid sluggish school bureaucracies. — Bruce Fuller, University of California at Berkeley professor
Barack Obama’s proposals fall short of John McCain’s call for systemic change in the form of school-choice vouchers and greater competition between the public and private sectors for the delivery of education services. Take Obama’s proposal to better use technology in the classroom. Most people would probably say that technology in the classroom improves student learning and achievement. But the evidence is far from clear. Even Obama’s call for added charter-school funding is problematic. Charter schools are supposed to be local efforts free from bureaucratic red tape. More federal money and the ambiguous “accountability” strings that Obama has mentioned in his speeches could undercut charters’ raison d’etre. — Lance T. Izumi, Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy