<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The money behind the campaigns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:43:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398795</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 13:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398795</guid>
		<description>Here it is.  The smoking gun.  Picture of Obama with a convicted terrorist.  

www.apfn.org/APFN/schlussel011001.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here it is.  The smoking gun.  Picture of Obama with a convicted terrorist.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.apfn.org/APFN/schlussel011001.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.apfn.org/APFN/schlussel011001.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American_Way</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398705</link>
		<dc:creator>American_Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 02:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398705</guid>
		<description>&quot;In the case of his relationship with Rezko, Obama has also been slow to acknowledge the full extent of his relationship. 

It was only last week that he revealed Rezko had raised some $250,000 in campaign contributions for him. 

The campaign had initially claimed Rezko-connected contributions were no more than $60,000, an amount the campaign donated to charity. Then the figure grew to around $86,000, and there were additional revelations that put the amount at about $150,000. Obama&#039;s $250,000 accounting was a substantial jump and clearly contradicted earlier campaign statements that Rezko was just one of &quot;thousands of donors.&quot; 

Is either candidate lilly white?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In the case of his relationship with Rezko, Obama has also been slow to acknowledge the full extent of his relationship. </p>
<p>It was only last week that he revealed Rezko had raised some $250,000 in campaign contributions for him. </p>
<p>The campaign had initially claimed Rezko-connected contributions were no more than $60,000, an amount the campaign donated to charity. Then the figure grew to around $86,000, and there were additional revelations that put the amount at about $150,000. Obama&#8217;s $250,000 accounting was a substantial jump and clearly contradicted earlier campaign statements that Rezko was just one of &#8220;thousands of donors.&#8221; </p>
<p>Is either candidate lilly white?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American_Way</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398703</link>
		<dc:creator>American_Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 02:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398703</guid>
		<description>Now why would Obama do this? Why protect donations to political campaigns from BROKE people?

Obama Bill to Protect Charitable and Religious Donations from Bankruptcy Passes Senate

WASHINGTON - U.S. Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) today said that legislation he introduced with Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) that would allow individuals in bankruptcy to continue giving to churches and charities has passed the Senate. The legislation is expected to pass the House when Congress returns in November.

&quot;For millions of Americans, charitable giving and tithing is an essential part of their lives,&quot; Obama said. &quot;And in a country where 37 million citizens live in poverty, we should be encouraging charitable giving, not limiting it. This bill will clarify that the Bankruptcy bill passed by Congress last year - a bill I voted against - did not change the law to prioritize creditors over religious institutions and charities.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now why would Obama do this? Why protect donations to political campaigns from BROKE people?</p>
<p>Obama Bill to Protect Charitable and Religious Donations from Bankruptcy Passes Senate</p>
<p>WASHINGTON &#8211; U.S. Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) today said that legislation he introduced with Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) that would allow individuals in bankruptcy to continue giving to churches and charities has passed the Senate. The legislation is expected to pass the House when Congress returns in November.</p>
<p>&#8220;For millions of Americans, charitable giving and tithing is an essential part of their lives,&#8221; Obama said. &#8220;And in a country where 37 million citizens live in poverty, we should be encouraging charitable giving, not limiting it. This bill will clarify that the Bankruptcy bill passed by Congress last year &#8211; a bill I voted against &#8211; did not change the law to prioritize creditors over religious institutions and charities.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American_Way</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398702</link>
		<dc:creator>American_Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 02:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398702</guid>
		<description>&quot;Barack Obama, of course. But trudging through OpenSecrets.org, a searchable website of the Center for Responsive Politics, I managed to find a total of $1,761,696 in donations by corporations and lobbyists among its 100 top donor list.

In fact, the big 4 categories are below:

Obama&#039;s Donors, Top 100, CFRP 
Donor Class Largest Donor Total 
Financial $375,978 $1,252,826 
Business $131,485 $336,090 
Communications $43,483 $66,236 
Insurance $40,150 $43,150 

In the financial sector, one and a quarter million dollars have found their way into the Obama campagin. The largest donor was Goldman Sacs at $375,978. JP Morgan Chase was second with $216,459 while Citigroup coughed up $181,787 and Morgan Stanley only produced $109,025 to finance Obama&#039;s campaign.

Time Warner led the big business contributors to the Obama campaign with $131,485, followed by GE at $47,450 and Microsoft at $44,250. Last time I looked, each of those were &#039;corporations&#039;.

AT&amp;T, you know, the communications corporation, kicked in $43,483 and among insurance corporations, Blue Cross/Blue Shield managed to send along $40,150 to the Obama campaign.

Other corporate contributors include Boeing, Walt Disney, Vivendi, UPS, Lockheed Martin, General Motors and American Airlines.

I even managed to find contributions from Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly &amp; Co. and GlaxoSmithKline to the tune of $23,350. And apparently Big Oil didn&#039;t want to be left out in the cold with Chevron, BP and Exxon Mobil contributing $27,059 to the non-corporation funded Obama campaign.&quot;

If Obama took a penny, he is just as &quot;guilty&quot; or &quot;sinful&quot; as McClame (for whatever reason libs think this is sinful or nasty).

Now I don&#039;t get it, but if MCclame is guilty, so is Obama.  Or do libs have degress of sin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Barack Obama, of course. But trudging through OpenSecrets.org, a searchable website of the Center for Responsive Politics, I managed to find a total of $1,761,696 in donations by corporations and lobbyists among its 100 top donor list.</p>
<p>In fact, the big 4 categories are below:</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s Donors, Top 100, CFRP<br />
Donor Class Largest Donor Total<br />
Financial $375,978 $1,252,826<br />
Business $131,485 $336,090<br />
Communications $43,483 $66,236<br />
Insurance $40,150 $43,150 </p>
<p>In the financial sector, one and a quarter million dollars have found their way into the Obama campagin. The largest donor was Goldman Sacs at $375,978. JP Morgan Chase was second with $216,459 while Citigroup coughed up $181,787 and Morgan Stanley only produced $109,025 to finance Obama&#8217;s campaign.</p>
<p>Time Warner led the big business contributors to the Obama campaign with $131,485, followed by GE at $47,450 and Microsoft at $44,250. Last time I looked, each of those were &#8216;corporations&#8217;.</p>
<p>AT&amp;T, you know, the communications corporation, kicked in $43,483 and among insurance corporations, Blue Cross/Blue Shield managed to send along $40,150 to the Obama campaign.</p>
<p>Other corporate contributors include Boeing, Walt Disney, Vivendi, UPS, Lockheed Martin, General Motors and American Airlines.</p>
<p>I even managed to find contributions from Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly &amp; Co. and GlaxoSmithKline to the tune of $23,350. And apparently Big Oil didn&#8217;t want to be left out in the cold with Chevron, BP and Exxon Mobil contributing $27,059 to the non-corporation funded Obama campaign.&#8221;</p>
<p>If Obama took a penny, he is just as &#8220;guilty&#8221; or &#8220;sinful&#8221; as McClame (for whatever reason libs think this is sinful or nasty).</p>
<p>Now I don&#8217;t get it, but if MCclame is guilty, so is Obama.  Or do libs have degress of sin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American_Way</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398699</link>
		<dc:creator>American_Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 02:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398699</guid>
		<description>So Phantom your bank account is less than 2,000 dollars, like most Americans, you have not saved for retirement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Phantom your bank account is less than 2,000 dollars, like most Americans, you have not saved for retirement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedant</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398697</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 02:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398697</guid>
		<description>American_Way
Posted August 9, 2008 at 8:52 pm &#124; Permalink
Like very few others, I will be like the couple who died in Kansas who had lived a very frugal life - but donated millions to their chosen cause.
---

:D

Sure.  You know the one thing couples like that have -- that you now no longer have -- and that I suspect is at the very heart of &quot;live frugally leave millions?&quot;

Modesty. :wink:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American_Way<br />
Posted August 9, 2008 at 8:52 pm | Permalink<br />
Like very few others, I will be like the couple who died in Kansas who had lived a very frugal life &#8211; but donated millions to their chosen cause.<br />
&#8212;</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Sure.  You know the one thing couples like that have &#8212; that you now no longer have &#8212; and that I suspect is at the very heart of &#8220;live frugally leave millions?&#8221;</p>
<p>Modesty. :wink:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American_Way</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398694</link>
		<dc:creator>American_Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 01:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398694</guid>
		<description>BTW, I drive cars until the engine falls out. I don&#039;t value BIG trucks, SUV&#039;s or other phallic symbols pleasing modes of transportation.

Like very few others, I will be like the couple who died in Kansas who had lived a very frugal life - but donated millions to their chosen cause.

At present time, I am putting even MORE in the markets. I am buying low.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, I drive cars until the engine falls out. I don&#8217;t value BIG trucks, SUV&#8217;s or other phallic symbols pleasing modes of transportation.</p>
<p>Like very few others, I will be like the couple who died in Kansas who had lived a very frugal life &#8211; but donated millions to their chosen cause.</p>
<p>At present time, I am putting even MORE in the markets. I am buying low&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American_Way</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398692</link>
		<dc:creator>American_Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 01:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398692</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s fishy about it? How much have YOU saved for retirement?

Or are you waiting for the gubermint handouts too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s fishy about it? How much have YOU saved for retirement?</p>
<p>Or are you waiting for the gubermint handouts too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phantom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398679</link>
		<dc:creator>Phantom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 01:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398679</guid>
		<description>That sounds awfully fishy, an office mgr. that drives a 93 cavalier sending mcbush over 60,000! She must live frugally just so she can send all her savings to John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds awfully fishy, an office mgr. that drives a 93 cavalier sending mcbush over 60,000! She must live frugally just so she can send all her savings to John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMWalker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398667</link>
		<dc:creator>JMWalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 23:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398667</guid>
		<description>Franklin
Posted August 9, 2008 at 11:20 am &#124; Permalink

pmom
I have not lied about a thing.
Obama DOES get fundraising support from Rap and Hip Hop stars, who promote gangs.
Obama DOES get support from radical Moslems.
(Obama’s “Moslem Outreach” guy, on his own campaign, just had to resign because of radical connections
====================================================
Back it, bozo. The gang thing and the Muslim thing. And while you&#039;re at it, list all of McCain&#039;s people who resigned over their radical interests, including the RR&#039;s.
 
 How about your dog McCain, putting out pure bulls**t ads on Obama? I suppose lying is okay in your book, as long as your dog does it? Very sleezy, moron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Franklin<br />
Posted August 9, 2008 at 11:20 am | Permalink</p>
<p>pmom<br />
I have not lied about a thing.<br />
Obama DOES get fundraising support from Rap and Hip Hop stars, who promote gangs.<br />
Obama DOES get support from radical Moslems.<br />
(Obama’s “Moslem Outreach” guy, on his own campaign, just had to resign because of radical connections<br />
====================================================<br />
Back it, bozo. The gang thing and the Muslim thing. And while you&#8217;re at it, list all of McCain&#8217;s people who resigned over their radical interests, including the RR&#8217;s.</p>
<p> How about your dog McCain, putting out pure bulls**t ads on Obama? I suppose lying is okay in your book, as long as your dog does it? Very sleezy, moron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American_Way</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398648</link>
		<dc:creator>American_Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 22:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398648</guid>
		<description>Pedant I don&#039;t think the average American makes the connection to the military DoD budget as supporting big oil (actually I think the connection is it supports BIG defense contractors).

Did you include the federal government in your B Billions? They sure love to tax that big oil too.

I will agree shallow people will continue to be mad at &quot;big oil&quot; for all that&#039;s wrong in life.

No different than a heroin addict being mad at his pusher, as the druggy sticks the needle in his vein.

Thinking people will realize everytime you point a finger on your hand at someone else - there are three fingers pointing right back at you.

But elections aren&#039;t for thinking people. They are not rational or based upon facts. It&#039;s the emotional irrational and sound bytes that get the votes. Like the current Obama ad attacking McClame on &quot;big oil&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pedant I don&#8217;t think the average American makes the connection to the military DoD budget as supporting big oil (actually I think the connection is it supports BIG defense contractors).</p>
<p>Did you include the federal government in your B Billions? They sure love to tax that big oil too.</p>
<p>I will agree shallow people will continue to be mad at &#8220;big oil&#8221; for all that&#8217;s wrong in life.</p>
<p>No different than a heroin addict being mad at his pusher, as the druggy sticks the needle in his vein.</p>
<p>Thinking people will realize everytime you point a finger on your hand at someone else &#8211; there are three fingers pointing right back at you.</p>
<p>But elections aren&#8217;t for thinking people. They are not rational or based upon facts. It&#8217;s the emotional irrational and sound bytes that get the votes. Like the current Obama ad attacking McClame on &#8220;big oil&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agnatha</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398643</link>
		<dc:creator>Agnatha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 22:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398643</guid>
		<description>More spin free bullsh*t puncturing from factcheck. 

www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/did_obama_replace_the_us_flag_on.html

www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/more_tax_deceptions.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More spin free bullsh*t puncturing from factcheck. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/did_obama_replace_the_us_flag_on.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/did_obama_replace_the_us_flag_on.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/more_tax_deceptions.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/more_tax_deceptions.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedant</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398642</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 22:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398642</guid>
		<description>It still presents a couple very large problems for McCain, AmWay. 

First, all US taxpayers send Big Oil a yearly check for something between $75 billion to $150 billion.  That&#039;s on top of buying gasoline at $4/gal, and it&#039;s also on top of military spending dedicated solely to protecting Big Oil interests, aka US national energy interests.  So we pay $4/gal, we pay to maintain an obscenely bloated military in large part for Big Oil&#039;s benefit, and to top if off we STILL send about a $100 billion (with a B) in checks to &#039;em each year just because they own sufficient Congress persons and the White House. 

Second, if you count up &quot;every American earning more than 200K&quot; how many Americans do you count? ANS: &lt; 5% of all households earn 200K.   It&#039;s a helluva price McCain pays for these votes, too.  Ruinously costly, as I&#039;m sure McCain will soon discover.

If you&#039;re a thinking American who&#039;s also not employed by Big Oil, then not only to you have every right to be disgusted with McCain&#039;s link to it, you&#039;re an idiot if you don&#039;t.   By any objective measure, Big Oil is -- always HAS been, in fact -- a pretty disgusting US corporate citizen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It still presents a couple very large problems for McCain, AmWay. </p>
<p>First, all US taxpayers send Big Oil a yearly check for something between $75 billion to $150 billion.  That&#8217;s on top of buying gasoline at $4/gal, and it&#8217;s also on top of military spending dedicated solely to protecting Big Oil interests, aka US national energy interests.  So we pay $4/gal, we pay to maintain an obscenely bloated military in large part for Big Oil&#8217;s benefit, and to top if off we STILL send about a $100 billion (with a B) in checks to &#8216;em each year just because they own sufficient Congress persons and the White House. </p>
<p>Second, if you count up &#8220;every American earning more than 200K&#8221; how many Americans do you count? ANS: &lt; 5% of all households earn 200K.   It&#8217;s a helluva price McCain pays for these votes, too.  Ruinously costly, as I&#8217;m sure McCain will soon discover.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a thinking American who&#8217;s also not employed by Big Oil, then not only to you have every right to be disgusted with McCain&#8217;s link to it, you&#8217;re an idiot if you don&#8217;t.   By any objective measure, Big Oil is &#8212; always HAS been, in fact &#8212; a pretty disgusting US corporate citizen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American_Way</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398641</link>
		<dc:creator>American_Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 22:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398641</guid>
		<description>BJ, our anger at &quot;big oil&quot; is misdirected. We should be mad at OURselves - the biggest abusers and wasteful users of oil.

Every time I see a big pick-em-up truck or an SUV I get mad. If only because they block my view from my little civic hybrid.

Everytime I review the Energy Act which gives car companies until 2022 to meet only 35 MPG (fleet average) I get mad.

And they should require ROAD tests for all those sweet looking ladies who drive SUV&#039;s to feel safe (or big).

You can&#039;t park them straight in a standard mall parking lot - and back them out without hitting something, NO LICENSE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BJ, our anger at &#8220;big oil&#8221; is misdirected. We should be mad at OURselves &#8211; the biggest abusers and wasteful users of oil.</p>
<p>Every time I see a big pick-em-up truck or an SUV I get mad. If only because they block my view from my little civic hybrid.</p>
<p>Everytime I review the Energy Act which gives car companies until 2022 to meet only 35 MPG (fleet average) I get mad.</p>
<p>And they should require ROAD tests for all those sweet looking ladies who drive SUV&#8217;s to feel safe (or big).</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t park them straight in a standard mall parking lot &#8211; and back them out without hitting something, NO LICENSE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueJay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398636</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 21:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398636</guid>
		<description>You made a point you had no intention of making there &quot;American way&quot;.

    The way we waste the very valuable resource petroleum is shameful and stupid.

    One use packaging that we then bury in the ground forever? Burning it up in antiquated engine technology?

     And there&#039;s only so much of the stuff to go around. Drilling it out faster only hurries us up running out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You made a point you had no intention of making there &#8220;American way&#8221;.</p>
<p>    The way we waste the very valuable resource petroleum is shameful and stupid.</p>
<p>    One use packaging that we then bury in the ground forever? Burning it up in antiquated engine technology?</p>
<p>     And there&#8217;s only so much of the stuff to go around. Drilling it out faster only hurries us up running out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phantom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398632</link>
		<dc:creator>Phantom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 21:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398632</guid>
		<description>Big Oil and Big Arabs, don&#039;t ya mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big Oil and Big Arabs, don&#8217;t ya mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American_Way</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398622</link>
		<dc:creator>American_Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 21:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398622</guid>
		<description>&quot;McCain and Big Oil&quot;

Let&#039;s get something straight. There is nothing evil about &quot;big oil&quot;. American stock holders, 401K plans, and mutual funds all contain &quot;big oil&quot; as part of a well balanced portfolio. This includes democrats investments too.

Petroleum products are used in every American household, and they have made our lives easier and provide many of the luxuries we enjoy in life.
A partial list:

Solvents 
 Diesel 
 Motor Oil 
 Bearing Grease 
 
Ink 
 Floor Wax 
 Ballpoint Pens 
 Football Cleats 
 
Upholstery 
 Sweaters 
 Boats 
 Insecticides 
 
Bicycle Tires 
 Sports Car Bodies 
 Nail Polish 
 Fishing lures 
 
Dresses 
 Tires 
 Golf Bags 
 Perfumes 
 
Cassettes 
 Dishwasher 
 Tool Boxes 
 Shoe Polish 
 
Motorcycle Helmet 
 Caulking 
 Petroleum Jelly 
 Transparent Tape 
 
CD Player 
 Faucet Washers 
 Antiseptics 
 Clothesline 
 
Curtains 
 Food Preservatives 
 Basketballs 
 Soap 
 
Vitamin Capsules 
 Antihistamines 
 Purses 
 Shoes 
 
Dashboards 
 Cortisone 
 Deodorant 
 Footballs 
 
Putty 
 Dyes 
 Panty Hose 
 Refrigerant 
 
Percolators 
 Life Jackets 
 Rubbing Alcohol 
 Linings 
 
Skis 
 TV Cabinets 
 Shag Rugs 
 Electrician&#039;s Tape 
 
Tool Racks 
 Car Battery Cases 
 Epoxy 
 Paint 
 
Mops 
 Slacks 
 Insect Repellent 
 Oil Filters 
 
Umbrellas 
 Yarn 
 Fertilizers 
 Hair Coloring 
 
Roofing 
 Toilet Seats 
 Fishing Rods 
 Lipstick 
 
Denture Adhesive 
 Linoleum 
 Ice Cube Trays 
 Synthetic Rubber 
 
Speakers 
 Plastic Wood 
 Electric Blankets 
 Glycerin 
 
Tennis Rackets 
 Rubber Cement 
 Fishing Boots 
 Dice 
 
Nylon Rope 
 Candles 
 Trash Bags 
 House Paint 
 
Water Pipes 
 Hand Lotion 
 Roller Skates 
 Surf Boards 
 
Shampoo 
 Wheels 
 Paint Rollers 
 Shower Curtains 
 
Guitar Strings 
 Luggage 
 Aspirin 
 Safety Glasses 
 
Antifreeze 
 Football Helmets 
 Awnings 
 Eyeglasses 
 
Clothes 
 Toothbrushes 
 Ice Chests 
 Footballs 
 
Combs 
 CD&#039;s 
 Paint Brushes 
 Detergents 
 
Vaporizers 
 Balloons 
 Sun Glasses 
 Tents 
 
Heart Valves 
 Crayons 
 Parachutes 
 Telephones 
 
Enamel 
 Pillows 
 Dishes 
 Cameras 
 
Anesthetics 
 Artificial Turf 
 Artificial limbs 
 Bandages 
 
Dentures 
 Model Cars 
 Folding Doors 
 Hair Curlers 
 
Cold cream 
 Movie film 
 Soft Contact lenses 
 Drinking Cups 
 
Fan Belts 
 Car Enamel 
 Shaving Cream 
 Ammonia 
 
Refrigerators 
 Golf Balls 
 Toothpaste 
 Gasoline 
 
That said, just who do YOU send your campaign funding too? Do you send your money to liberal candidates who will support YOUR views?

Well it stands to reason that the oil companies and investors will give THEIR contributions to candidates who support their cause.

Don&#039;t be surprised if every American earning more than 200K sends a check to McCain. And every major corporation in America.  Afterall, which candidate has promised to hurt them?

Nothing unethical here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;McCain and Big Oil&#8221;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get something straight. There is nothing evil about &#8220;big oil&#8221;. American stock holders, 401K plans, and mutual funds all contain &#8220;big oil&#8221; as part of a well balanced portfolio. This includes democrats investments too.</p>
<p>Petroleum products are used in every American household, and they have made our lives easier and provide many of the luxuries we enjoy in life.<br />
A partial list:</p>
<p>Solvents<br />
 Diesel<br />
 Motor Oil<br />
 Bearing Grease </p>
<p>Ink<br />
 Floor Wax<br />
 Ballpoint Pens<br />
 Football Cleats </p>
<p>Upholstery<br />
 Sweaters<br />
 Boats<br />
 Insecticides </p>
<p>Bicycle Tires<br />
 Sports Car Bodies<br />
 Nail Polish<br />
 Fishing lures </p>
<p>Dresses<br />
 Tires<br />
 Golf Bags<br />
 Perfumes </p>
<p>Cassettes<br />
 Dishwasher<br />
 Tool Boxes<br />
 Shoe Polish </p>
<p>Motorcycle Helmet<br />
 Caulking<br />
 Petroleum Jelly<br />
 Transparent Tape </p>
<p>CD Player<br />
 Faucet Washers<br />
 Antiseptics<br />
 Clothesline </p>
<p>Curtains<br />
 Food Preservatives<br />
 Basketballs<br />
 Soap </p>
<p>Vitamin Capsules<br />
 Antihistamines<br />
 Purses<br />
 Shoes </p>
<p>Dashboards<br />
 Cortisone<br />
 Deodorant<br />
 Footballs </p>
<p>Putty<br />
 Dyes<br />
 Panty Hose<br />
 Refrigerant </p>
<p>Percolators<br />
 Life Jackets<br />
 Rubbing Alcohol<br />
 Linings </p>
<p>Skis<br />
 TV Cabinets<br />
 Shag Rugs<br />
 Electrician&#8217;s Tape </p>
<p>Tool Racks<br />
 Car Battery Cases<br />
 Epoxy<br />
 Paint </p>
<p>Mops<br />
 Slacks<br />
 Insect Repellent<br />
 Oil Filters </p>
<p>Umbrellas<br />
 Yarn<br />
 Fertilizers<br />
 Hair Coloring </p>
<p>Roofing<br />
 Toilet Seats<br />
 Fishing Rods<br />
 Lipstick </p>
<p>Denture Adhesive<br />
 Linoleum<br />
 Ice Cube Trays<br />
 Synthetic Rubber </p>
<p>Speakers<br />
 Plastic Wood<br />
 Electric Blankets<br />
 Glycerin </p>
<p>Tennis Rackets<br />
 Rubber Cement<br />
 Fishing Boots<br />
 Dice </p>
<p>Nylon Rope<br />
 Candles<br />
 Trash Bags<br />
 House Paint </p>
<p>Water Pipes<br />
 Hand Lotion<br />
 Roller Skates<br />
 Surf Boards </p>
<p>Shampoo<br />
 Wheels<br />
 Paint Rollers<br />
 Shower Curtains </p>
<p>Guitar Strings<br />
 Luggage<br />
 Aspirin<br />
 Safety Glasses </p>
<p>Antifreeze<br />
 Football Helmets<br />
 Awnings<br />
 Eyeglasses </p>
<p>Clothes<br />
 Toothbrushes<br />
 Ice Chests<br />
 Footballs </p>
<p>Combs<br />
 CD&#8217;s<br />
 Paint Brushes<br />
 Detergents </p>
<p>Vaporizers<br />
 Balloons<br />
 Sun Glasses<br />
 Tents </p>
<p>Heart Valves<br />
 Crayons<br />
 Parachutes<br />
 Telephones </p>
<p>Enamel<br />
 Pillows<br />
 Dishes<br />
 Cameras </p>
<p>Anesthetics<br />
 Artificial Turf<br />
 Artificial limbs<br />
 Bandages </p>
<p>Dentures<br />
 Model Cars<br />
 Folding Doors<br />
 Hair Curlers </p>
<p>Cold cream<br />
 Movie film<br />
 Soft Contact lenses<br />
 Drinking Cups </p>
<p>Fan Belts<br />
 Car Enamel<br />
 Shaving Cream<br />
 Ammonia </p>
<p>Refrigerators<br />
 Golf Balls<br />
 Toothpaste<br />
 Gasoline </p>
<p>That said, just who do YOU send your campaign funding too? Do you send your money to liberal candidates who will support YOUR views?</p>
<p>Well it stands to reason that the oil companies and investors will give THEIR contributions to candidates who support their cause.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be surprised if every American earning more than 200K sends a check to McCain. And every major corporation in America.  Afterall, which candidate has promised to hurt them?</p>
<p>Nothing unethical here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggotpunk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398621</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggotpunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 21:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398621</guid>
		<description>Paul, I&#039;m glad you brought up support from radical Muslims because McCain had to return $50,000 he received from a Muslim in Jordan.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/07/AR2008080702133.html?hpid=topnews

I guess we&#039;ll hear non-stop criticism from you about McCain like you constantly criticized Clinton for receiving money from Hsu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, I&#8217;m glad you brought up support from radical Muslims because McCain had to return $50,000 he received from a Muslim in Jordan.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/07/AR2008080702133.html?hpid=topnews" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/07/AR2008080702133.html?hpid=topnews</a></p>
<p>I guess we&#8217;ll hear non-stop criticism from you about McCain like you constantly criticized Clinton for receiving money from Hsu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398566</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 16:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398566</guid>
		<description>Here you go, another resignation, another radical in Obama&#039;s camp:

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/022101.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here you go, another resignation, another radical in Obama&#8217;s camp:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/022101.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/022101.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398564</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 16:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398564</guid>
		<description>pmom
I have not lied about a thing.
Obama DOES get fundraising support from Rap and Hip Hop stars, who promote gangs.
Obama DOES get support from radical Moslems.
(Obama&#039;s &quot;Moslem Outreach&quot; guy, on his own campaign, just had to resign because of radical connections)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pmom<br />
I have not lied about a thing.<br />
Obama DOES get fundraising support from Rap and Hip Hop stars, who promote gangs.<br />
Obama DOES get support from radical Moslems.<br />
(Obama&#8217;s &#8220;Moslem Outreach&#8221; guy, on his own campaign, just had to resign because of radical connections)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aldenrw</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398563</link>
		<dc:creator>aldenrw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 16:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398563</guid>
		<description>Y&#039;know, if we would only run our Presidential Elections the way the Constitution specifies, we wouldn&#039;t have to suffer with these agonizing campaigns or the out-of-control fund raising. 

I&#039;m referring, of course, to the &quot;indirect&quot; or &quot;representative&quot; method, where states choose Electors, and Electors use their own best judgement [sic: your spelling checker needs help] to select the person _they_ feel is best qualified. 

We just have to convince several million egotistical twits that &quot;you really _aren&#039;t_ qualified to pick the POTUS, you know.&quot; Maybe you&#039;re one of them. If so, I apologize for revealing the fact that you&#039;re a fool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y&#8217;know, if we would only run our Presidential Elections the way the Constitution specifies, we wouldn&#8217;t have to suffer with these agonizing campaigns or the out-of-control fund raising. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m referring, of course, to the &#8220;indirect&#8221; or &#8220;representative&#8221; method, where states choose Electors, and Electors use their own best judgement [sic: your spelling checker needs help] to select the person _they_ feel is best qualified. </p>
<p>We just have to convince several million egotistical twits that &#8220;you really _aren&#8217;t_ qualified to pick the POTUS, you know.&#8221; Maybe you&#8217;re one of them. If so, I apologize for revealing the fact that you&#8217;re a fool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sursum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398552</link>
		<dc:creator>sursum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 15:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398552</guid>
		<description>JMW: I also understand that the Prime Minsiter and all Members of the Cabinet (all of whom are elected Members of Parliament...no appointees) must also answer questions in Parlaimentary sessions by members on any topic or policy of the Government, while standing on their feet! The British call it Question Perod, a tradition also in the other 3 countries noted above. Supposedly, it&#039;s like a verbal wresting match, with no holds barred. I wonder what the debating skills are like under that scenario, it must be delicious to see squirming on live TV!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JMW: I also understand that the Prime Minsiter and all Members of the Cabinet (all of whom are elected Members of Parliament&#8230;no appointees) must also answer questions in Parlaimentary sessions by members on any topic or policy of the Government, while standing on their feet! The British call it Question Perod, a tradition also in the other 3 countries noted above. Supposedly, it&#8217;s like a verbal wresting match, with no holds barred. I wonder what the debating skills are like under that scenario, it must be delicious to see squirming on live TV!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedant</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398551</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 15:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398551</guid>
		<description>:lol:

Obama and &quot;moslems:&quot; I&#039;m thinking it might play with the tinfoil crowd, which is what, maybe 4% of voting Americans.  NOTE: upon close inspection, the link between Obama and &quot;moslems&quot; dissipates quickly, leading to the 4% number above.

McCain and Big Oil: now THAT&#039;s a link that flat out &lt;i&gt;resonates&lt;/i&gt; with every voting American (some choose to downplay it or even ignore it, obviously).  NOTE: upon close inspection, the link between McCain and Big OIL &lt;b&gt;grows stronger&lt;/b&gt;, leading to the 100% number above.

Let&#039;s see, which of the above has the most staying power?  Decisions, decisions, decisions....

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:lol:</p>
<p>Obama and &#8220;moslems:&#8221; I&#8217;m thinking it might play with the tinfoil crowd, which is what, maybe 4% of voting Americans.  NOTE: upon close inspection, the link between Obama and &#8220;moslems&#8221; dissipates quickly, leading to the 4% number above.</p>
<p>McCain and Big Oil: now THAT&#8217;s a link that flat out <i>resonates</i> with every voting American (some choose to downplay it or even ignore it, obviously).  NOTE: upon close inspection, the link between McCain and Big OIL <b>grows stronger</b>, leading to the 100% number above.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see, which of the above has the most staying power?  Decisions, decisions, decisions&#8230;.</p>
<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phantom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398550</link>
		<dc:creator>Phantom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 15:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398550</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d read obama has a fraction of the budlers that mccain has. Not sure if that was total bundlers, or based on the amounts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d read obama has a fraction of the budlers that mccain has. Not sure if that was total bundlers, or based on the amounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political_mama</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/08/the-money-behind-the-campaigns/#comment-398547</link>
		<dc:creator>Political_mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 15:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/?p=9325#comment-398547</guid>
		<description>Darn it MP, I was going to link that story here.  You beat me to it.  Oh well, it&#039;s worth repeating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darn it MP, I was going to link that story here.  You beat me to it.  Oh well, it&#8217;s worth repeating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
