The money behind the campaigns

The New York Times wrote about how Barack Obama, in addition to receiving millions in small-dollar donations, relies heavily on big donors and donation bundlers.

Meanwhile, the Washington Post reported that one of John McCain’s bundlers is the owner of an oil-trading company that recently inked defense contracts potentially worth more than $1 billion.

McClatchy newspapers also reported on how a middle-class couple from New York have written $61,600 in checks to McCain’s presidential campaign and the Republican National Committee, most of it within days of McCain’s decision to endorse offshore oil drilling. The woman, who drives a 1993 Chevy Cavalier, works as an office manager for Hess Corp., which does deepwater drilling. The donations, first traced by Campaign Money Watch last week, were part of $1.2 million in oil industry contributions to McCain’s Victory ’08 Committee, 73 percent coming after McCain reversed his long-held opposition to offshore oil drilling.

35 Comments

  1. Posted August 9, 2008 at 6:14 am | Permalink

    Connection to Big Oil isn’t helping the Republicans.

    http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Linked_to_big_oil_incumbent_Tenn._0808.html

    Incumbent Rep. David Davis lost his primary bid to Johnson City Mayor Phil Roe. Davis should have easily won the heavily Republican district but Republicans were fed up with Davis’ ass kissing of the oil companies.

    Let’s hope McCain, Tiahrt and Roberts follow suit in the general election. With oil companies making record profits they know who to thank for their economic success, and the money isn’t going to Democrats.

  2. writerdog
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 7:31 am | Permalink

    Sometimes I do wish I could be a bigger whore. Have no morals and willing to eat my own babies. But then I am a human being, its not easy all the time but then neither is being a hollow shell I guess.

  3. sursum
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 7:48 am | Permalink

    Canada allows recognized political parties free radio/TV time to discuss their policies and rebut the opposition and contains the amount a party can spend to about 70 cents per voter and no more than $60,000.00 per candadate. The ruling party in that country spent $18 million to get elected last time and the Prime Minister himself only spent $60,000. Unions and corporations cannot contribute to any camapaign and individuals are limited to $500.00. Federal funding is also avaiable, though I don’t know how that works. This kind of political funding is and Australian, New Zealand and I think, British practice as well, so being Parliamentary Democrcacies may not be any better, but costs seem a helluva lot more in tune with common sense. Did I read somewherethe next POTUS will have spent close to $1 billion to get elected?

  4. Regular
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 8:03 am | Permalink

    Maggotpunk
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 6:14 am | Permalink

    Connection to Big Oil isn’t helping the Republicans
    ———————–
    A connection doesn’t hurt either. Especially not with high gas prices. To deny the existence of the most predominant transportation fuel on the planet is just plain dumb.
    …………………..
    Since Brownlib saw fit not to put what the NY Times had to say about Obama’s contributor’s, I’ll do it.

    Behind those larger donations is a phalanx of more than 500 Obama “bundlers,” fund-raisers who have each collected contributions totaling $50,000 or more. Many of the bundlers come from industries with critical interests in Washington. Nearly three dozen of the bundlers have raised more than $500,000 each, including more than a half-dozen who have passed the $1 million mark and one or two who have exceeded $2 million, according to interviews with fund-raisers. Hedge-fund executives, for example, have bundled large sums for Mr. Obama at a time when their industry has been looking to increase its clout in Washington.

  5. JMWalker
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 8:53 am | Permalink

    sursum,
    Canadian politicians are also greeted by a phalanx of reporters after sessions, and they are bombarded with questions they must answer. It’s a regular shooting gallery, and something no politician from this country would have the huevos to face. Can you imagine either mcsame or obama having to go through that? I would love to see it.

  6. george
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 9:36 am | Permalink

    Politicians will take money from anybody. I bet Obama & the dems have collected big bucks from trial lawyers. News media reporting is one sided, they do not tell the whole story. Another reason the public is down on them, at least I am.

  7. GMC70
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 9:56 am | Permalink

    Ya mean, the “new politics” looks an awful lot like the “old” politics?”

    I’m shocked, I tell ya. Shocked.

  8. Franklin
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 10:22 am | Permalink

    Obama gets fundraising help from gang-promoting rap music and hip-hop music artists.
    Obama is supported by many radical Moslem groups.

    Obama ALSO gets massive support from the Wichita Eagle — just about the worst shame of all!

  9. Political_mama
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 10:35 am | Permalink

    AHaha, looks like Nathan got PART of his wish- a thread about the flip flop on the drilling positions. He just wanted it to be about Obama. HAHAHA.

  10. Political_mama
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 10:36 am | Permalink

    aPAULing, if you feel the need to lie to get ahead, what does that tell you?

  11. Political_mama
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 10:38 am | Permalink

    Darn it MP, I was going to link that story here. You beat me to it. Oh well, it’s worth repeating.

  12. Phantom
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 10:53 am | Permalink

    I’d read obama has a fraction of the budlers that mccain has. Not sure if that was total bundlers, or based on the amounts.

  13. Pedant
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 10:53 am | Permalink

    :lol:

    Obama and “moslems:” I’m thinking it might play with the tinfoil crowd, which is what, maybe 4% of voting Americans. NOTE: upon close inspection, the link between Obama and “moslems” dissipates quickly, leading to the 4% number above.

    McCain and Big Oil: now THAT’s a link that flat out resonates with every voting American (some choose to downplay it or even ignore it, obviously). NOTE: upon close inspection, the link between McCain and Big OIL grows stronger, leading to the 100% number above.

    Let’s see, which of the above has the most staying power? Decisions, decisions, decisions….

    :D

  14. sursum
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    JMW: I also understand that the Prime Minsiter and all Members of the Cabinet (all of whom are elected Members of Parliament…no appointees) must also answer questions in Parlaimentary sessions by members on any topic or policy of the Government, while standing on their feet! The British call it Question Perod, a tradition also in the other 3 countries noted above. Supposedly, it’s like a verbal wresting match, with no holds barred. I wonder what the debating skills are like under that scenario, it must be delicious to see squirming on live TV!

  15. aldenrw
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 11:19 am | Permalink

    Y’know, if we would only run our Presidential Elections the way the Constitution specifies, we wouldn’t have to suffer with these agonizing campaigns or the out-of-control fund raising.

    I’m referring, of course, to the “indirect” or “representative” method, where states choose Electors, and Electors use their own best judgement [sic: your spelling checker needs help] to select the person _they_ feel is best qualified.

    We just have to convince several million egotistical twits that “you really _aren’t_ qualified to pick the POTUS, you know.” Maybe you’re one of them. If so, I apologize for revealing the fact that you’re a fool.

  16. Franklin
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 11:20 am | Permalink

    pmom
    I have not lied about a thing.
    Obama DOES get fundraising support from Rap and Hip Hop stars, who promote gangs.
    Obama DOES get support from radical Moslems.
    (Obama’s “Moslem Outreach” guy, on his own campaign, just had to resign because of radical connections)

  17. Franklin
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 11:22 am | Permalink

    Here you go, another resignation, another radical in Obama’s camp:

    http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/022101.php

  18. Posted August 9, 2008 at 4:17 pm | Permalink

    Paul, I’m glad you brought up support from radical Muslims because McCain had to return $50,000 he received from a Muslim in Jordan.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/07/AR2008080702133.html?hpid=topnews

    I guess we’ll hear non-stop criticism from you about McCain like you constantly criticized Clinton for receiving money from Hsu.

  19. American_Way
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 4:17 pm | Permalink

    “McCain and Big Oil”

    Let’s get something straight. There is nothing evil about “big oil”. American stock holders, 401K plans, and mutual funds all contain “big oil” as part of a well balanced portfolio. This includes democrats investments too.

    Petroleum products are used in every American household, and they have made our lives easier and provide many of the luxuries we enjoy in life.
    A partial list:

    Solvents
    Diesel
    Motor Oil
    Bearing Grease

    Ink
    Floor Wax
    Ballpoint Pens
    Football Cleats

    Upholstery
    Sweaters
    Boats
    Insecticides

    Bicycle Tires
    Sports Car Bodies
    Nail Polish
    Fishing lures

    Dresses
    Tires
    Golf Bags
    Perfumes

    Cassettes
    Dishwasher
    Tool Boxes
    Shoe Polish

    Motorcycle Helmet
    Caulking
    Petroleum Jelly
    Transparent Tape

    CD Player
    Faucet Washers
    Antiseptics
    Clothesline

    Curtains
    Food Preservatives
    Basketballs
    Soap

    Vitamin Capsules
    Antihistamines
    Purses
    Shoes

    Dashboards
    Cortisone
    Deodorant
    Footballs

    Putty
    Dyes
    Panty Hose
    Refrigerant

    Percolators
    Life Jackets
    Rubbing Alcohol
    Linings

    Skis
    TV Cabinets
    Shag Rugs
    Electrician’s Tape

    Tool Racks
    Car Battery Cases
    Epoxy
    Paint

    Mops
    Slacks
    Insect Repellent
    Oil Filters

    Umbrellas
    Yarn
    Fertilizers
    Hair Coloring

    Roofing
    Toilet Seats
    Fishing Rods
    Lipstick

    Denture Adhesive
    Linoleum
    Ice Cube Trays
    Synthetic Rubber

    Speakers
    Plastic Wood
    Electric Blankets
    Glycerin

    Tennis Rackets
    Rubber Cement
    Fishing Boots
    Dice

    Nylon Rope
    Candles
    Trash Bags
    House Paint

    Water Pipes
    Hand Lotion
    Roller Skates
    Surf Boards

    Shampoo
    Wheels
    Paint Rollers
    Shower Curtains

    Guitar Strings
    Luggage
    Aspirin
    Safety Glasses

    Antifreeze
    Football Helmets
    Awnings
    Eyeglasses

    Clothes
    Toothbrushes
    Ice Chests
    Footballs

    Combs
    CD’s
    Paint Brushes
    Detergents

    Vaporizers
    Balloons
    Sun Glasses
    Tents

    Heart Valves
    Crayons
    Parachutes
    Telephones

    Enamel
    Pillows
    Dishes
    Cameras

    Anesthetics
    Artificial Turf
    Artificial limbs
    Bandages

    Dentures
    Model Cars
    Folding Doors
    Hair Curlers

    Cold cream
    Movie film
    Soft Contact lenses
    Drinking Cups

    Fan Belts
    Car Enamel
    Shaving Cream
    Ammonia

    Refrigerators
    Golf Balls
    Toothpaste
    Gasoline

    That said, just who do YOU send your campaign funding too? Do you send your money to liberal candidates who will support YOUR views?

    Well it stands to reason that the oil companies and investors will give THEIR contributions to candidates who support their cause.

    Don’t be surprised if every American earning more than 200K sends a check to McCain. And every major corporation in America. Afterall, which candidate has promised to hurt them?

    Nothing unethical here.

  20. Phantom
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 4:50 pm | Permalink

    Big Oil and Big Arabs, don’t ya mean.

  21. Posted August 9, 2008 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    You made a point you had no intention of making there “American way”.

    The way we waste the very valuable resource petroleum is shameful and stupid.

    One use packaging that we then bury in the ground forever? Burning it up in antiquated engine technology?

    And there’s only so much of the stuff to go around. Drilling it out faster only hurries us up running out of it.

  22. American_Way
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 5:08 pm | Permalink

    BJ, our anger at “big oil” is misdirected. We should be mad at OURselves – the biggest abusers and wasteful users of oil.

    Every time I see a big pick-em-up truck or an SUV I get mad. If only because they block my view from my little civic hybrid.

    Everytime I review the Energy Act which gives car companies until 2022 to meet only 35 MPG (fleet average) I get mad.

    And they should require ROAD tests for all those sweet looking ladies who drive SUV’s to feel safe (or big).

    You can’t park them straight in a standard mall parking lot – and back them out without hitting something, NO LICENSE!

  23. Pedant
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 5:09 pm | Permalink

    It still presents a couple very large problems for McCain, AmWay.

    First, all US taxpayers send Big Oil a yearly check for something between $75 billion to $150 billion. That’s on top of buying gasoline at $4/gal, and it’s also on top of military spending dedicated solely to protecting Big Oil interests, aka US national energy interests. So we pay $4/gal, we pay to maintain an obscenely bloated military in large part for Big Oil’s benefit, and to top if off we STILL send about a $100 billion (with a B) in checks to ‘em each year just because they own sufficient Congress persons and the White House.

    Second, if you count up “every American earning more than 200K” how many Americans do you count? ANS: < 5% of all households earn 200K. It’s a helluva price McCain pays for these votes, too. Ruinously costly, as I’m sure McCain will soon discover.

    If you’re a thinking American who’s also not employed by Big Oil, then not only to you have every right to be disgusted with McCain’s link to it, you’re an idiot if you don’t. By any objective measure, Big Oil is — always HAS been, in fact — a pretty disgusting US corporate citizen.

  24. Agnatha
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 5:12 pm | Permalink

    More spin free bullsh*t puncturing from factcheck.

    http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/did_obama_replace_the_us_flag_on.html

    http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/more_tax_deceptions.html

  25. American_Way
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 5:20 pm | Permalink

    Pedant I don’t think the average American makes the connection to the military DoD budget as supporting big oil (actually I think the connection is it supports BIG defense contractors).

    Did you include the federal government in your B Billions? They sure love to tax that big oil too.

    I will agree shallow people will continue to be mad at “big oil” for all that’s wrong in life.

    No different than a heroin addict being mad at his pusher, as the druggy sticks the needle in his vein.

    Thinking people will realize everytime you point a finger on your hand at someone else – there are three fingers pointing right back at you.

    But elections aren’t for thinking people. They are not rational or based upon facts. It’s the emotional irrational and sound bytes that get the votes. Like the current Obama ad attacking McClame on “big oil”.

  26. JMWalker
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 6:53 pm | Permalink

    Franklin
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 11:20 am | Permalink

    pmom
    I have not lied about a thing.
    Obama DOES get fundraising support from Rap and Hip Hop stars, who promote gangs.
    Obama DOES get support from radical Moslems.
    (Obama’s “Moslem Outreach” guy, on his own campaign, just had to resign because of radical connections
    ====================================================
    Back it, bozo. The gang thing and the Muslim thing. And while you’re at it, list all of McCain’s people who resigned over their radical interests, including the RR’s.

    How about your dog McCain, putting out pure bulls**t ads on Obama? I suppose lying is okay in your book, as long as your dog does it? Very sleezy, moron.

  27. Phantom
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 8:12 pm | Permalink

    That sounds awfully fishy, an office mgr. that drives a 93 cavalier sending mcbush over 60,000! She must live frugally just so she can send all her savings to John.

  28. American_Way
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 8:49 pm | Permalink

    What’s fishy about it? How much have YOU saved for retirement?

    Or are you waiting for the gubermint handouts too?

  29. American_Way
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 8:52 pm | Permalink

    BTW, I drive cars until the engine falls out. I don’t value BIG trucks, SUV’s or other phallic symbols pleasing modes of transportation.

    Like very few others, I will be like the couple who died in Kansas who had lived a very frugal life – but donated millions to their chosen cause.

    At present time, I am putting even MORE in the markets. I am buying low…..

  30. Pedant
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 9:15 pm | Permalink

    American_Way
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 8:52 pm | Permalink
    Like very few others, I will be like the couple who died in Kansas who had lived a very frugal life – but donated millions to their chosen cause.

    :D

    Sure. You know the one thing couples like that have — that you now no longer have — and that I suspect is at the very heart of “live frugally leave millions?”

    Modesty. :wink:

  31. American_Way
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 9:21 pm | Permalink

    So Phantom your bank account is less than 2,000 dollars, like most Americans, you have not saved for retirement?

  32. American_Way
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 9:34 pm | Permalink

    “Barack Obama, of course. But trudging through OpenSecrets.org, a searchable website of the Center for Responsive Politics, I managed to find a total of $1,761,696 in donations by corporations and lobbyists among its 100 top donor list.

    In fact, the big 4 categories are below:

    Obama’s Donors, Top 100, CFRP
    Donor Class Largest Donor Total
    Financial $375,978 $1,252,826
    Business $131,485 $336,090
    Communications $43,483 $66,236
    Insurance $40,150 $43,150

    In the financial sector, one and a quarter million dollars have found their way into the Obama campagin. The largest donor was Goldman Sacs at $375,978. JP Morgan Chase was second with $216,459 while Citigroup coughed up $181,787 and Morgan Stanley only produced $109,025 to finance Obama’s campaign.

    Time Warner led the big business contributors to the Obama campaign with $131,485, followed by GE at $47,450 and Microsoft at $44,250. Last time I looked, each of those were ‘corporations’.

    AT&T, you know, the communications corporation, kicked in $43,483 and among insurance corporations, Blue Cross/Blue Shield managed to send along $40,150 to the Obama campaign.

    Other corporate contributors include Boeing, Walt Disney, Vivendi, UPS, Lockheed Martin, General Motors and American Airlines.

    I even managed to find contributions from Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Co. and GlaxoSmithKline to the tune of $23,350. And apparently Big Oil didn’t want to be left out in the cold with Chevron, BP and Exxon Mobil contributing $27,059 to the non-corporation funded Obama campaign.”

    If Obama took a penny, he is just as “guilty” or “sinful” as McClame (for whatever reason libs think this is sinful or nasty).

    Now I don’t get it, but if MCclame is guilty, so is Obama. Or do libs have degress of sin?

  33. American_Way
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 9:36 pm | Permalink

    Now why would Obama do this? Why protect donations to political campaigns from BROKE people?

    Obama Bill to Protect Charitable and Religious Donations from Bankruptcy Passes Senate

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) today said that legislation he introduced with Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) that would allow individuals in bankruptcy to continue giving to churches and charities has passed the Senate. The legislation is expected to pass the House when Congress returns in November.

    “For millions of Americans, charitable giving and tithing is an essential part of their lives,” Obama said. “And in a country where 37 million citizens live in poverty, we should be encouraging charitable giving, not limiting it. This bill will clarify that the Bankruptcy bill passed by Congress last year – a bill I voted against – did not change the law to prioritize creditors over religious institutions and charities.”

  34. American_Way
    Posted August 9, 2008 at 9:39 pm | Permalink

    “In the case of his relationship with Rezko, Obama has also been slow to acknowledge the full extent of his relationship.

    It was only last week that he revealed Rezko had raised some $250,000 in campaign contributions for him.

    The campaign had initially claimed Rezko-connected contributions were no more than $60,000, an amount the campaign donated to charity. Then the figure grew to around $86,000, and there were additional revelations that put the amount at about $150,000. Obama’s $250,000 accounting was a substantial jump and clearly contradicted earlier campaign statements that Rezko was just one of “thousands of donors.”

    Is either candidate lilly white?

  35. Skeptic
    Posted August 10, 2008 at 8:11 am | Permalink

    Here it is. The smoking gun. Picture of Obama with a convicted terrorist.

    http://www.apfn.org/APFN/schlussel011001.jpg