Sound and fury in college debate

In my Friday column, I leap into the debate about a screaming, obscenity-laced confrontation between two debate coaches that ended up with one of them, assistant professor William Shanahan of Fort Hays State, dropping his pants, bending over and mooning his opponent with exposed underwear.

The shout-down happened at a tournament at Wichita State University earlier this year, and a video clip ended up on YouTube this month, where it quickly became a hit.

It seemed to me a pretty pathetic spectacle, and in keeping with the creeping lack of civility and restraint in our public discourse.

On Friday, Fort Hays State fired Shanahan over the incident. University president Edward Hammond said in a written statement, “Everyone has the right to freedom of speech, but these actions are not acceptable for someone who is representing our university.”

Shanahan told an interviewer: “Obviously it got out of control, but to be honest I thought I was in a safe house. I thought I was part of a community that handled its problems internally and that recognized the dangers of exposing ourselves — no pun intended — to the rest of the country. It is so difficult as a nonparticipant to understand what is going on in the debate round.”

Maybe that’s part of the problem?

35 Comments

  1. Jed
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 6:37 am | Permalink

    I suppose that this could affect the level of the presidential debates too. Just think how much press you could get by mooning your opponent and having it posted on YouTube! And after all, we all got to look up President Reagan’s ass on national television coverage of his colonoscopy. What a precedent!

  2. Regular
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 6:56 am | Permalink

    Once you get past the skin part Jed, everyone looks basically the same on the inside. :D

    Sounded like a lively debate, maybe they’ll sell the audio and video for a University fund raiser. :D

  3. beber
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 7:19 am | Permalink

    Fort Hays State advertised itself for years as a winner of a national debate championship. Shanahan was the coach. When he’s gone, they’ll still advertise themselves as a former winner of a national debate chamionship. I always liked Shanahan.

  4. Monkeyhawk
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 7:34 am | Permalink

    There’s something screwy about the whole incident.

    At college debate tournaments the coaches don’t debate.

    Debate coaches confront other coaches over matters of judging, tactics, et cetera, in coaches’ lounges, tabulating rooms, or hallways.

    Seems like a half-moon on YouTube isn’t really germane to the process at had, either to lose or keep your job.

    If Mark Mangino were to drop trou on national TV and moon a referee (sorry for that mental image so early in the morning) you might have an issue.

    But a debate coach from Hays America on YouTube.

    I guess that’s what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps.

  5. Posted August 23, 2008 at 8:38 am | Permalink

    Shanahan is a local character out here, and he’s been a thorn in the side of the local power structure and GOBN, headed by Ed Hammond, for years. They’ve been LOOKING for an excuse to get rid of him for a very long time.

    Too bad he finally gave them a reason to do it. He was an outspoken liberal in a sea of Volga German conservative catholics.

    And you know, one simply may not speak to the Queen that way, as Brett Butler used to say.

    Bub-bye Bill. I’ll wave at your head on the pike when I pass by. The Hays Growth Mongers not only got rid of you, but you are one in a long line of folks used as an example of what happens when you challenge the Hays power structure.

  6. Posted August 23, 2008 at 8:39 am | Permalink

    Beber is exactly right. I see it happen all the time. The GOBN take the fruits of your labor, and then kick you to the curb when it’s time to settle the accounts. But they’ll still take the fruits. Your share and theirs.

  7. Posted August 23, 2008 at 9:14 am | Permalink

    Debate has been getting worse and worse over the years as it has become quantitative instead of qualitative.

    The debaters just talk as fast as they can to squeeze in as many points as they can. The opposition then has to respond to all those points and make their own.

    It’s an exercise in who can talk the fastest.

    They should go back to the old days when elegance of expression was valued.

  8. Posted August 23, 2008 at 9:17 am | Permalink

    Too bad Shanahan wasn’t represented by a union.

    They could have tried to fire him but the union would hire an top-notch attorney to fight it in court.

    Most colleges don’t want the hassle.

    BUT on your own, you got nothing. You’re fair game for any administrator who doesn’t like your lip.

  9. Posted August 23, 2008 at 9:18 am | Permalink

    Okay, folks, what the heck is GOBN?

  10. KSGolfnut
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 9:29 am | Permalink

    Speaking of a union…

    I’m still looking for a boat. C’mon HBCers – stay strong my brothers in arms. Solidarity!

    UNION YES!
    UNION NOW!

  11. Raptor
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 9:37 am | Permalink

    public indecency, and kfg accuses some mysterious and anonymous GOBN of getting rid of this guy? That is a reach. Debate is about organized, researched and civil discourse..not screaming and disrobing.

  12. beber
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 10:11 am | Permalink

    You’ll never get your boat for 20 cents on the dollar golpher. The repossession business owned by your buddy at the country club will get it first, and I doubt that he’ll cut you a deal.

  13. Franklin
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 10:16 am | Permalink

    Any chance that this guy is one of our liberal Bloggers?
    He has about as much class —

  14. Franklin
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 10:24 am | Permalink

    Accomplishments do not grant license to ignore the rules.
    Those of you who act like this guy did nothing wrong are truly amazing.
    Supported by taxpayer dollars, he creates a hostile work environment, presents a bad image of his school and the state, and you defend him?

    It does not matter what happened before. Whatever life or reputation he had built for himself was always at risk.

    That is the way it should be for all of us.

    Otherwise — some people think they are above the law or above the rules.

  15. YellowdogLiberal
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 10:35 am | Permalink

    Franklin sniffed, disapprovingly

  16. XXX
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 10:47 am | Permalink

    #
    CapnAmerica
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 9:18 am | Permalink

    Okay, folks, what the heck is GOBN?

    I second. What is GOBN?

  17. HLP
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 10:50 am | Permalink

    Good
    Old
    Boy
    Network

  18. Phantom
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 12:05 pm | Permalink

    I can understand why Franklin might think he’s up against a debate coach on the blog.

  19. Posted August 23, 2008 at 12:06 pm | Permalink

    Please post where I condoned what Shanahan did.

    I didnt. I didnt defend what he did. I SAID he finally gave them a reason to do what they wanted to do.

    Do you all just have a problem with reading and comprehension? Both things are true. They HAVE been trying to get rid of him because of his outspoken liberalism and his opposition to the wind farm.

    He WAS also wrong in what he did on the video and gave them the reason they’d been looking for to silence him. And make an example of ANYONE who opposes the power structure in Hays.

    Someone said the mark of an intelligent person is that they can hold two opposing thoughts in their head at the same time.

    Some of you should try it…

  20. Posted August 23, 2008 at 12:08 pm | Permalink

    And captain, like you, I’m appalled at what debate has apparently become. I’m an old debater and an alum of Ft. Hays. This sounds like theater, not debate.

    I still say my participation in debate was the biggest advantage I had in my career. I was always thankful for the critical thinking skills, research skills, and speaking skills I gained in that venue.

    This? Bears no resemblance to what we used to do in debates. And we won.

  21. Franklin
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 12:17 pm | Permalink

    FYI
    Debated in High School and, briefly, in College.
    Was also a Judge, more than once.

  22. nunyer
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 1:31 pm | Permalink

    kfg, you said, “They HAVE been trying to get rid of him because of his outspoken liberalism and his opposition to the wind farm.”

    His multiple arrests for assault probably had more to do with his dismissal. (Assaults against police officers, his son’s T-ball game referee and another spectator, his eye doctor . . . and those were just the ones that were reported.) If you’re from the area you know he has a reputation for uncivil discourse. He’s well-known for yelling and screaming at the drop of a hat, a strange reaction from someone who’s supposed to be both a role model and a professor of communications.

    The dean of the FHSU college who helped investigate this issue, Faber, was a much more outspoken and effective opponent of the wind farm. That issue doesn’t seem to have been a factor in the decision.

  23. Franklin
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 1:51 pm | Permalink

    Gosh
    So many liberals that don’t like windfarms.
    Not in MY backyard, huh?

  24. beber
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 2:14 pm | Permalink

    “Debated in High School and, briefly, in College.
    Was also a Judge, more than once.” — Franklin

    Once again, the WingNut has the pertinent personal experience. Uncanny. If the subject were all the tea in China, at least a half dozen of them would claim to be tea tasters.

  25. Raptor
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    hey beber…did you miss kfg saying…

    “I still say my participation in debate….”?

    OF COURSE YOU DID…you don’t bother with reality at all, do you? Everything you see/hear is somehow a means to slam people who don’t agree with you, isn’t it?

    must be sad to be so petty and so obsessed.

  26. Posted August 23, 2008 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    I like Faber, and yes, I’m from the area.

    I do know all about Bill’s legal problems, and, for the last time, I am not defending him. But dont tell me his OUTSPOKEN oppositon to the Hays power structure didnt have something to do with it. After this incident, Faber had no choice.

    And it isnt just libs who oppose this windfarm.

  27. Posted August 23, 2008 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    Hehehehe. Evil grin.

    Any takers that there may be new dirt on the windfarm and Ellis county politics?

    http://www.hdnews.net/Story/batteryarson082208

    Politics is a contact sport in Ellis county.

  28. beber
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    Hit’s the nail on the head, doesn’t Raptor. You’re the person claiming to take neither side, yet always on the side of the Right. You are a standard character on every blog.

  29. Raptor
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    Ahhhh….very mature. Ignore my questions and go on the attack instead. You really do have a problem with reality, don’t you?

    Truly pathetic.

  30. Phantom
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 3:09 pm | Permalink

    Never on a debate team, however, never lost an argument!

  31. beber
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 3:29 pm | Permalink

    “Ahhhh….very mature. Ignore my questions and go on the attack instead. You really do have a problem with reality, don’t you?” — Raptor

    This is like the 100,000th time you’ve used those exact words on this blog, Raptor. Would it tax you too much just once to write something original?

  32. lindainks55
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 5:03 pm | Permalink

    “Debated in High School and, briefly, in College.
    Was also a Judge, more than once.” — Franklin

    The more interesting (and telling) part of that statement was his admission of being a “judge” more than once. I see it daily, but didn’t realize he had “credentials.” ;-)

    I used to judge debates. It was eons ago when debate still included “eloquence of expressison,” as Capn called it. It was always instructive and nerve racking to me. I wanted everyone to win! Know what, I think they all did. We used to tease our son about being a Master Debater. He has used those skills often — teaching, the ever-present need to get funding, and even testifying before Congress as an expert.

  33. Raptor
    Posted August 23, 2008 at 5:42 pm | Permalink

    that is because that is the 100,000th time you or one of your buddies have done the exact same pitiful thing. You cannot carry on an intelligent, adult conversation, instead you rely solely on insults, attacks and childish vulgarity.

  34. GMC70
    Posted August 24, 2008 at 1:09 am | Permalink

    Shanahan. Idiot. ‘Nuff said.

  35. Posted August 25, 2008 at 3:19 pm | Permalink

    absolutely loved coming upon this post!!