Why am I asking? Well, I’m just wondering is all.

Originally, the term applied to the celtic/Scottish who refused to join the Church of England. They wore red to show their protest against the Anglicans, and their support of Presbyterianism.

Then, perhaps due to the heavy immigration of Scots Irish into the area, the symbol was transferred to coal mining country. There was a rebellion among pro-union coal miners against the private security hired by some of the coal mine operators.

The War of Blair Mountain was the largest insurrection since the Civil War. Nearly 10,000 “Red Neck” Union members were involved.

Those “Red Necks” were multi-racial and multi-ethnic.

Beber, YOU are a bigot.

You assume that everyone who disagrees with you is morally inferior to you.

You assume that those of us who disagree with Obama are “racist” —

And you ignore your own racism and bigotry, which is certainly there for all of us to see.

Earth to Franklin. Romney’s faith was exclusively an issue within his own party since nobody thought the twice-born branch was open minded enough to overlook the more colorful aspects.

And sure enough, yall strangled his candidacy in his crib, and over his faith.

:lol:

He is now and forever categorized as PNG.

The End.

Also, Obama’s step Father, I believe, was also Moslem.

And, as I stated, to begin with, if Mitt Romney is chosen, Romney’s faith, and Romney’s stand on polygamy, will be an issue.

The Eagle likes all the “warm and fuzzy” Kansas “connections” — those connections are far, far weaker than the Moslem connection.

How much time has Obama really spent, in Kansas?

Perhaps because he was raised by his mother?

So I guess Franklin’s “working” “theory” is that Obama’s father, absent from his life since he was a small boy, still managed somehow ipso facto to turn him into a Manchurian candidate slash “Moslem” assassin slash walking talking kicking ticking time bomb of a Democrat who will throw out the Constitution in favor of Sharia. In other words, somehow the drat Democrats once again have nominated a traitor as their candidate for POTUS.

Right. Got it then. :roll:

….ok, not sure about yall, but I do believe I see the beginning of ODS, Obama Derangement Syndrome here. Or, as I suspect, worse (a knee-jerk attempt to bypass all discussion and replace it with implacable hatred of all things Democrat). As yall love to preach to the Democrats, all that wild-eyed hate’s gonna back up on ya. :D

You want the POSITIVE family connections, while you want to leave out the NEGATIVE family connections.

Either they BOTH matter, or they BOTH don’t matter.

Which is it?

Why is Obama’s Mother important, while Obama’s Moslem Father is NOT important?

I haven’t lied about anything.

And you have no explanation why you’re lollygagging away in Kansas while real Marines are fighting and dying.

Fine, don’t believe me. You still don’t have one shred of proof for the crap you are saying about me though.

Liar.

I have no reason to believe you.

All I have to disagree with you is the fact that Marines are recruiting felons and drop-outs rather than tap you for more service in the War on Terror.

They don’t want you, “Nathaniel.” They have a reason for that and you certainly won’t share why the Marines think their efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan are best served with you half a world away from where their mission matters.

You are an ex-Marine.

They’re through with you because they’ve seen you at work and they don’t like the quality of your work.

They’d much rather take their chances with high school drop-outs and felons. More reliable.

Deal with it.

I have responded to you stupidity several times. That is all it is, stupidity. Either you were too stupid to grasp the concept the first 3 times I explained it to you or you are just being stupid on purpose.

Which is it?

Enlighten us.

Tell us why the Marines have lowered their recruitment standards to accept felons and high school drop-outs rather than calling up a hale and healthy combat-experienced warrior to fight and win the war on terror?

They don’t want you back, “Nathaniel.”

They don’t need you.

They figure they’re better off with felons and drop-outs than with another 12 or 15 months of “Nathaniel” in their ranks on the front lines.

Face it, boy. You are an ex-Marine.

The real Marines would rather go to war without you. They know why even if you don’t.

As usual, you have no idea what you are talking about.

I support troops who don’t want you back in combat beside them.
.
They obviously have figured you out