Comments on: Clinton will be nominated; is she taking over?

By: Osvaldo Livingston

Osvaldo Livingston — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:46:30 +0000

great point of view

By: corporalspider44th

corporalspider44th — Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:52:06 +0000

I’d vote for Hillary Clinton, Obama doesn’t seem to want to address alot of issues or at the most side step them during campaign speeches, and McCain, well can the U.S. for once be led by a person who DOESN’T qualify for the senior citizens discount?. Americas racist ideology will definitely play a factor in the November elections.

By: bjb

bjb — Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:03:07 +0000

Brownlee plays it far too safe. Not guts, no glory.
My post on this turn of events is anything but safe.
Thank God I am right.
And if right, should probably have Brownlee’s j.o.b.

By: bjb

bjb — Fri, 15 Aug 2008 03:17:59 +0000

My Gore Hypothesis explains it all.
Hillary has been green lighted to reopen this wound. Why?
Because Barry is not THE ONE.
Neither is Hillary.
Al Gore comes to save the day.
Google “green gornet”
I have it all on my webpage.
Look up and smile Democrats, your redemption draweth nigh.

By: outlander

outlander — Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:51:43 +0000

“We’ve all seen the consequences of Republic Party “experience.” (The Big) Dick Cheney had loads of experience. Donald Rumsfeld was experienced.”

——————

Monkey Logic: A has experience. A does mediocre job. Therefore experience is bad.

BTW Monkey, you sure do like to use the “N” word don’t you? You use it way more than anyone else here. Anyone else notice that?

Pretty racist of you.

By: BlueJay

BlueJay — Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:42:33 +0000

Good assessment Vaughn.

I tend to agree.

Hillary is no quitter. And it’s hard for a person like that to lose.

But thing is?

I really don’t know why ANYONE wants the job given the mess at hand. The next President has so much to overcome from the start that they are almost fated to fail. Any honeymoon at all will be quite short.

Senator Clinton may have come to realize this on reflection.

By: BlueJay

BlueJay — Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:35:48 +0000

“The Republican convention holds no drama”

Oh I don’t know that I’d be ready to say that.

To be sure there will be plenty of party police.

Those Ron Paul folks are….determined. There are probably a few moles in place. I’m sure the con convention won’t go without incident.

By: Phantom

Phantom — Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:19:55 +0000

Wan’t the biggest portion of his military experience gained in a cell?

By: Phantom

Phantom — Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:14:10 +0000

Will bush and cheney even get an invite?

By: Monkeyhawk

Monkeyhawk — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:06:11 +0000

“outlander” admits –

“…I can’t think of a lot of good reasons to vote for McCain.

But there are a lot of good ones not vote for the young and woefully inexperience, but clean and articulate, Obama.”

We’ve all seen the consequences of Republic Party “experience.” (The Big) Dick Cheney had loads of experience. Donald Rumsfeld was experienced. John Sidney McCain the Third (for Shrub’s 3rd term) has experience being wrong on the economy, wrong on Iraq, wrong on energy.

Yeah. That’s useful experience.

All you seem to have, “outlander” is negativity toward an uppity n*gger.

At least you’re honest about it.

By: Jack

Jack — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:40:06 +0000

To bad she wasnt at the campaign headquarters yesterday

By: CapnAmerica

CapnAmerica — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:29:06 +0000

McCadaver.

By: CapnAmerica

CapnAmerica — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:28:00 +0000

“Hillary won’t take the job if offered; she has higher aspirations.”

Good, then all the more reason to offer.

Obama can say, “hey, I tried . . . ” and then pick the person he really wants.

*****

As for McCain’s “experience,” outlander is right. McCain has never held a non-government job in his life. He’s been in Washington longer than dirt.

If that’s what you call “experience,” then by all means, go for it.

By: outlander

outlander — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:20:33 +0000

I would tend to agree with Monkey. I can’t think of a lot of good reasons to vote for McCain.

But there are a lot of good ones not vote for the young and woefully inexperience, but clean and articulate, Obama.

By: Monkeyhawk

Monkeyhawk — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:58:59 +0000

Has John Sidney McCain the Third (for Shrub’s 3rd term) come up with a commercial or a message that presents a reason to vote for him?

Nope.

It’s all negative. It’s all “don’t vote for the young, popular, inspiring, leader.”

“My face has been chewed up by melanoma and I approved this message.”

None of the CONs on this forum have come up with any basis for supporting McC*nt; only thinly-veiled racism and boilerplate rants about how Democrats are all Marxists and/or Muslims.

By: Phantom

Phantom — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:46:48 +0000

Obama shines at conventions. Look for a larg leap in the polls. Also, look for mccain to come out with some cheap(er) shots ads., to try and detract.

By: Regular

Regular — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:52:45 +0000

#
gster
Posted August 14, 2008 at 3:49 pm | Permalink

I read Moby Dick, Burma Shave signs and Mad magazine; am I dooomed?
—————–
No, Mad Magazine had that fold-in that if done correctly raised your IQ points significantly. :)

By: gster

gster — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:49:25 +0000

I read Moby Dick, Burma Shave signs and Mad magazine; am I dooomed?

By: avtolle

avtolle — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:47:34 +0000

Without regard to her spouse, Hillary won’t take the job if offered; she has higher aspirations. If my hypothesis that regardless of who wins the 2008 Presidential election, he (now) will be a one-term president proves correct, she won’t want to be on the losing side in 2012 if Obama wins in 2008; and wants to be positioned to run in 2012, if McCain wins.

By: GMC70

GMC70 — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:44:27 +0000

I think he should choose Hillary as Vice President.

She won’t take the job, even if offered.

And he won’t offer. Would you want Bill sculking around the White House, looking for a good intern?

By: avtolle

avtolle — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:42:24 +0000

But Capn, according to Franklin, just reading Alinsky makes one a Marxist. I’m aware that she criticized Alinsky’s tactics in her thesis, a link to which I’m sure will be appearing any time now.

By: CapnAmerica

CapnAmerica — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:40:54 +0000

I also read Ayn Rand and Milton Friedman, Franklin.

Does that mean I’m a right-wing ideologue?

By: CapnAmerica

CapnAmerica — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:39:07 +0000

Actually, what everybody forgets is that Clinton criticised Alinsky’s tactics.

I just wish she would have been more like the guy.

By: avtolle

avtolle — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:34:50 +0000

Goodness, Franklin, there are many who read Saul Alinsky in college in a course or two; reading Alinsky does not make one a Marxist. I guess I’m a Marxist because I read Das Kapital in Western Civilization while a Freshman in college, then. Oh, wait, that cannot be; I read Milton Friedman also in the same class, so I’m a monetarist. Or maybe I’m a Marxist monetarist. Confused, that’s what I am.

By: Franklin

Franklin — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:27:32 +0000

Obama read Saul Alinsky.

Clinton read Saul Alinsky.

Who will do the best job, following their Marxist hero?