I think there’s a good chance that Sen. Joe Biden will be Barack Obama’s vice presidential pick. The choice of Biden makes sense on several levels, as Chris Cillizza notes on his blog.
Among other strengths, Biden is the most experienced Democrat in Obama’s area of perceived weakness — foreign policy. He knows it inside and out, as well as John McCain’s weaknesses on Iraq and other strategic policy matters.
Biden is a great campaigner who can also go on the attack — a crucial skill for the second on the ticket.
Biden has a folksy, blue-collar appeal and sense of humor that would help loosen up Obama’s rather academic, aloof image.
He has roots in Pennsylvania and could help lock down that must-win swing state. Moreover, he’s a Catholic and could assist Obama with that important voting demographic.
Biden’s most talked-about weakness: He’s long-winded. That’s it? The important thing is, he’s fun to listen to and isn’t boring. He was great in the Democratic debates.
Another possible drawback: As a longtime Washington hand, he could be seen as old politics, not an agent of change.
But Obama’s greatest weakness is the sense that he’s inexperienced and an unknown quantity. Biden is one of the few veep candidates who reassures on both points.
If I had to pick right now, I’d say it’s Biden.
86 Comments
Randy: Are you saying Sen. Joe Biden would be even better than Kansas Governor, what’s her name, Kathleen Sebelius?
No, Randy is probably saying there are so many good VP choices among the Democrats no one person stands out. Republicans have had to settle for scraping the bottom of the barrel and pick the guy who was considered worse than Bush. You know Bush, the worst President ever.
I personally like Bill Richardson’s Resume better than Biden’s…. However, as pointed out in the Lead, Biden is a lot more loose on the campaign trail than Richardson…. and would most likely connect with the blue collar crowd much better….
Yeah, “Chas” –
I especially prefer Richardson because he doesn’t take a Democratic vote out of the Senate.
Yep MH also an important factor… most important…
Welcome to the Wichita Eagle Obama Campaign Headquarters.
If it wasnt for the age factor…. Obama might even want to consider Sandra Day O’Connor
Biden would be a good choice for Obama. At least he is an adult with some good experience.
Maggie, you’re slippin’. You weren’t able to work any anti-Christian bigotry into that post. But it’s early.
I shouldnt even be up yet… but sinuses are killing me this morning!! damn!!
#
Chas
Posted August 16, 2008 at 6:38 am | Permalink
I shouldnt even be up yet… but sinuses are killing me this morning!! damn!!
—————————
Dunk your head in some salt water for about 10 minutes, that should fix it.
Regular
Posted August 16, 2008 at 6:35 am | Permalink
Welcome to the Wichita Eagle Obama Campaign Headquarters.
***************************************************************************
Give mccluer a tissue for his tears!
It must be a sad day in your sister’s basement.
(chortles)
……………………..what is “anti-Christian bigotry”?
I see that Apophis has failed to release his real name once again.
Perhaps Apophis enjoys being the anonymous coward.
That must be it.
Why would you care who Obama chooses, Outlander?? It is very clear you wont support the Obama campaign anyway!! LOL
Let’s take a poll.
1.Who posts anonymously on this blog?
2. Does the desire to remain anonymous and protect your family from whackos (like possibly mccluer) make one a “coward”?
#
Apophis
Posted August 16, 2008 at 6:48 am | Permalink
Let’s take a poll.
1.Who posts anonymously on this blog?
2. Does the desire to remain anonymous and protect your family from whackos (like possibly mccluer) make one a “coward”?
—————————–
Coward.
You say you have convictions, but unwilling to put your name up to stand up for your conviction.
Correction: spineless coward
Regular
Posted August 16, 2008 at 6:49 am | Permalink
#
Apophis
Posted August 16, 2008 at 6:48 am | Permalink
Let’s take a poll.
1.Who posts anonymously on this blog?
2. Does the desire to remain anonymous and protect your family from whackos (like possibly mccluer) make one a “coward”?
—————————–
Coward.
You say you have convictions, but unwilling to put your name up to stand up for your conviction.
Correction: spineless coward
***********************************************************************************
Predictable!
(chortles)
The Blog should be anonymous… Those who wish to use their real names, do so at their own risk.
#
Chas
Posted August 16, 2008 at 6:53 am | Permalink
The Blog should be anonymous… Those who wish to use their real names, do so at their own risk.
———————–
Why?
So you can misbehave without consequences?
Where’s your sand boy?
“So you can misbehave without consequences?”
Who gets to define “misbehave”?
On this blog, it appears that is the presumed job of the reichwingers.
(chortles)
You see folks, Libs want to make these glorious, sanctimonious statements with taking the responsibility of putting their name behind it that they actually said it.
A typical Lib attribute – desire for glory with no personal responsibility.
I suppose, by some measures, I’ve “misbehaved” as much as anyone who contributes to this forum.
Nobody has to work too hard to track down my real-life identity.
Eh…
All of the bluster from wing-nuts how they’re gonna ruin people they disagree with it has resulted in bubkis. Nada. Nothing.
#
Monkeyhawk
Posted August 16, 2008 at 7:07 am | Permalink
I suppose, by some measures, I’ve “misbehaved” as much as anyone who contributes to this forum.
Nobody has to work too hard to track down my real-life identity.
Eh…
All of the bluster from wing-nuts how they’re gonna ruin people they disagree with it has resulted in bubkis. Nada. Nothing.
————————-
Sure it means something. By your own fluff, everyone now knows that you are Joe Myers.
However, to you credit, even though I detest most of your remarks, you continue to post even though your name is known, because you stand behind your convictions, right or wrong, you stand behind them.
Vaughn Tolle is a fine example of a poster who uses his real name and stands by his convictions.
The Prices use their real name and stand by their convictions, as does their neighbor Mary Caruso.
The reason many Libs post on this blog anonymously is to cause trouble, shake their fingers at others and be totally irresponsible for what they write here.
Do you think the Crapn would post on this blog and say the things he does if he used his real name? Definitely not.
Same with Apophis: I would have much more respect for him, if he posted with his real name and told me to ‘kiss his ass’ or some other thing. Instead, he hides in anonymity and makes insults behind the mask of a computer screen. He gets no respect nor a status.
JWink is an example of a poster who uses his real name.
Everyone knows my name and often use it here, or should I say they abuse it. The ones that abuse my name and personal information are the very same ones that hide behind an anonymous screen name.
I doubt seriously they would do they same thing if their name was known.
They lie when they say they don’t want me to know their name because of what I might do. They remain anonymous so they can be the cowardly insulter, the one who makes comments without taking responsibility for them.
They are cowards.
sadly what Regular said about dunking the head in salt water for ten minutes did cause me to chuckle.
Nothing against chas it just made me chuckle.
Regular
Posted August 16, 2008 at 7:20 am | Permalink
They are cowards.
***************************************************************************
(chortles)
“Regular” –
If you choose to do a bone-dig you will realize that I never address any contributor to this forum except for the nym they choose to post under.
I don’t really care for any of the “SoAndSo” is really “SomeoneElse” crap that clutters up this forum.
I’d rather talk about issues than personalities. But I get sucked into flame wars sometimes.
I’ve posted plenty of issues-oriented opinions that get “refuted” by wing-nuts with nothing more advanced than, “Your (sic) stupid!” or similarly insightful rebuttal. When faced with facts, they simply have nothing but ad hominem. I understand that. As they say in law school, “When the facts and the law are against you, wave your hands and holler!”
Holler all you want, “Regular.”
I realize it’s all you’ve got.
#
Monkeyhawk
Posted August 16, 2008 at 7:31 am | Permalink
“Regular” –
If you choose to do a bone-dig you will realize that I never address any contributor to this forum except for the nym they choose to post under.
I don’t really care for any of the “SoAndSo” is really “SomeoneElse” crap that clutters up this forum.
I’d rather talk about issues than personalities. But I get sucked into flame wars sometimes.
I’ve posted plenty of issues-oriented opinions that get “refuted” by wing-nuts with nothing more advanced than, “Your (sic) stupid!” or similarly insightful rebuttal. When faced with facts, they simply have nothing but ad hominem. I understand that. As they say in law school, “When the facts and the law are against you, wave your hands and holler!”
Holler all you want, “Regular.”
I realize it’s all you’ve got.
——————————-
I prefer to look at discussion as the old Barbershop setting.
Everyone knew everyone and even though there are sometimes vicious statements and unreasonable assumptions, they all went home at night that each had their say as a recognized individual and they stuck to their guns.
With decisions, accepting responsibility for them becomes greater if we stand up and be recognized.
To quibble anonymously is desperate muting of our individualism and against human nature.
People who place their name on the fore and don’t stand up for their convictions publicly are nothing more than scribbles on the bathroom wall.
I can’t stand it: here’s the proper way to use sic. — [sic]. It’s inside brackets to separate it from any possible parenthetical expression used by the original author, and italicized because it’s Latin.
Regular
Posted August 16, 2008 at 7:42 am | Permalink
People who place their name on the fore and don’t stand up for their convictions publicly are nothing more than scribbles on the bathroom wall.
********************************************************************************
[chortles]
Choice. That’s what it is and should remain. I choose who does and doesn’t know my full name.
MonkeyHawk, your post at 6:32 a.m. is EXACTLY how I feel!
“I especially prefer Richardson because he doesn’t take a Democratic vote out of the Senate.”
I’m still interested in the VP selections and roles. Do the candidates want the more traditional VP or something closer to the second oval office down the hall we’ve seen in cheney years?
If we took out all the posts that are irrelevant to Biden, this would be a pretty short set of comments.
I agree that Biden is a likely and a sensible choice. Obama absolutely needs someone with foreign policy credentials at this point (he chaired a subcommittee on European affairs and never held a single hearing, so his own credentials aren’t exactly stellar – one trip doesn’t change that), and Biden fits the bill. The Delaware Senate seat would go to another Democrat.
Most people have forgotten about Biden’s problems plagiarizing a British politician during his previous campaign for President, and the fact that he has proved completely incapable of winning votes on his own outside of Delaware in two campaigns, though not a strong point, is probably not a concern.
The only irony is that in an Obama/Biden ticket, when people consider readiness to govern as opposed to lofty rhetoric, it will look to many as though the ticket is upside down.
Those who find it unnecessary to change their “nic” at will are those I think are owning what they post. They stand behind each word they’ve posted, unlike those who attempt to remake themselves into something they are less ashamed of. Once “outed” they try to convince us they weren’t running from anything, weren’t trying to be someone different — while their posts tell the truth. Maybe they are “running” for something and use ptatitudes to get elected. Maybe they are “running” to be respectable posters who stand behind their own words?
A Biden VP would redeem Obama a little bit to real Democrats.
Biden knows the cons are the enemy and he is not afraid to fight them.
#
lindainks55
Posted August 16, 2008 at 9:05 am | Permalink
Those who find it unnecessary to change their “nic” at will are those I think are owning what they post. They stand behind each word they’ve posted, unlike those who attempt to remake themselves into something they are less ashamed of. Once “outed” they try to convince us they weren’t running from anything, weren’t trying to be someone different — while their posts tell the truth. Maybe they are “running” for something and use ptatitudes to get elected. Maybe they are “running” to be respectable posters who stand behind their own words?
—————————————-
I don’t mind my name being used here, but I expect reciprocal treatment if they are going to abuse it.
What I don’t like is people advertising my home address and email on this blog like CapnAmerica did and those anonymous Lib posters did for several months.
In fact, kansasnative, whoever that is still makes cowardly attacks by referencing my sister, where I live.
Kansasnative and other Lib cowards who make those kind of attacks are the ones I consider cowards.
Of course, I never hear from you lindainks on condemning these attacks.
My sister and you are probably the same age. Do you think her home address and her email should be drug through these blogs?
That’s what your coward Lib buddies do and they do it often.
Yet, not one peep from you.
Obama certainly doesn’t want the “cheney model,” as his VP. The presidency must be run by the president! Obama will need a strong leadership team showing us they have the experience to run our country. But if he swings too hard in the direction opposite the “cheney model,” then is he offering such a weak vice presidency that some wouldn’t want the office? Would those maybe be the choices that would give the most experience?
“Kansasnative and other Lib cowards who make those kind of attacks are the ones I consider cowards.” — Regular.
You mean the sort of cowards who don’t feel empowered unless they are packing a concealed weapon? That sort of coward?
Regular
Posted August 16, 2008 at 9:12 am | Permalink
#
lindainks55
Posted August 16, 2008 at 9:05 am | Permalink
Those who find it unnecessary to change their “nic” at will are those I think are owning what they post. They stand behind each word they’ve posted, unlike those who attempt to remake themselves into something they are less ashamed of. Once “outed” they try to convince us they weren’t running from anything, weren’t trying to be someone different — while their posts tell the truth. Maybe they are “running” for something and use ptatitudes to get elected. Maybe they are “running” to be respectable posters who stand behind their own words?
—————————————-
I don’t mind my name being used here, but I expect reciprocal treatment if they are going to abuse it.
What I don’t like is people advertising my home address and email on this blog like CapnAmerica did and those anonymous Lib posters did for several months.
In fact, kansasnative, whoever that is still makes cowardly attacks by referencing my sister, where I live.
Kansasnative and other Lib cowards who make those kind of attacks are the ones I consider cowards.
Of course, I never hear from you lindainks on condemning these attacks.
My sister and you are probably the same age. Do you think her home address and her email should be drug through these blogs?
That’s what your coward Lib buddies do and they do it often.
Yet, not one peep from you.
*******************************************************************
[chortles]
“RobertL” dredges up –
“…Biden’s problems plagiarizing a British politician during his previous campaign for President…”
Give me a break.
That was what? 1988? And it turns out Biden had given basically the same speech dozens of times that clearly cited Neil Kinnock; just not when the videotape was rolling.
And it was, once the truth of the situation was revealed, one of the most absurd “scandals” in American political history.
What a non-issue.
Biden is probably a fairly sensible choice for VP. He’s used to losing.
I don’t think you understand the American electorate. Much as I agree Joe Biden is as capable as any of the other VP contenders, he is also emotionally volatile and strident to the point of obnoxiousness on the stump; that undercurrent of anger will scare the folks out in middle America, who will not forget that Obama’s middle name is Hussein and that his old pastor is hardly patriotic. Sure, there’s a certain poetic justice in a black man running with a guy named Joe, and it actually is true that coffee was perhaps largely responsible for the European Enlightenment of the late 18thc, but if you trust the polls, most Americans are religious believers and haven’t yet reached the Enlightenment intellectually.
No, Obama can’t win with Biden. I say choose someone just as capable but emotionally more stable, someone on the order of Nelson Rockefeller for Ford, Mondale for Carter, Bush for Reagan, and Gore for Clinton.
And while I’m weighing in here, I think Tom Ridge (or someone like him), who is thoroughly experienced and as transparently good a politician as exists in the GOP, would make an excellent choice for John McCain. Ridge has the gravitas to step into the presidency if necessary, unlike any of McCain’s other possibilities.
Regular, I don’t even pretend to have influence over another poster. Don’t want it! Some may know me well enough to respect my opinion and want to ponder what I think while coming to their own conclusions. Some may use my opinions as examples of exactly what they won’t choose.
We’re adults! Some of us behave as such but everyone here knows who does and who doesn’t. I am responsible for me, as I think each poster should be for him / herself.
You will seldom see me defend anyone, neither will you see me censor anyone. I sometimes post my agreement, especially when I’ve been ready to type the same words but someone beat me to it. I see no reason to type something overandover. If I didn’t make myself clear and anyone is interested, they will ask what I meant. So, not only do I find it unnecessary to defend or censor other posters, I also find it unnecessary to restate my own opinions.
Name calling is childish. When a poster must think someone with a differing opinion is stupid, wrong, hypocritical, and a long list of other useless slams, I know they aren’t very confident in their own opinions. Usually those are the posts I scroll over. So maybe all your accusations about what I don’t speak out about are posts I’ve never read. But probably I think whatever each person posts speaks for itself and all of us “get it.”
beber — ;-)
Some posts make me think, some posts are scroll overs, some make me laugh right out loud!
#
lindainks55
Posted August 16, 2008 at 9:31 am | Permalink
Regular, I don’t even pretend to have influence over another poster. Don’t want it! Some may know me well enough to respect my opinion and want to ponder what I think while coming to their own conclusions. Some may use my opinions as examples of exactly what they won’t choose.
We’re adults! Some of us behave as such but everyone here knows who does and who doesn’t. I am responsible for me, as I think each poster should be for him / herself.
You will seldom see me defend anyone, neither will you see me censor anyone. I sometimes post my agreement, especially when I’ve been ready to type the same words but someone beat me to it. I see no reason to type something overandover. If I didn’t make myself clear and anyone is interested, they will ask what I meant. So, not only do I find it unnecessary to defend or censor other posters, I also find it unnecessary to restate my own opinions.
Name calling is childish. When a poster must think someone with a differing opinion is stupid, wrong, hypocritical, and a long list of other useless slams, I know they aren’t very confident in their own opinions. Usually those are the posts I scroll over. So maybe all your accusations about what I don’t speak out about are posts I’ve never read. But probably I think whatever each person posts speaks for itself and all of us “get it.”
———————
It’s not name calling.
It’s putting my sister’s personal information on the Web. She doesn’t even know how to work a computer.
Yet, no one steps up and condemns it.
If you feel that endangering my sister’s life to predators who might read this blog is part of the blog system, then I know that you understand nothing.
Well, Regular,
Apophis is a second rate middle school hack. He’s given enough personal information about himself that if some one cared enough they could find him by noon today.
Let’s see, he claims to be union delegate to the NEA convention. How many did we send, 8 to 12? Let’s say 12. How many were men? Half? That leaves six. How many of the six are such losers that they are middle aged middle school science teachers? I’d say one.
Yep, if the little ol’ coward Apophis ever threatened me with physical violence like the wimp junior does on occasion I think I’d send his wife some flowers. Just so he knew I could reach out and touch him!
Oh, and I’d post his name and address on the BLOG!
………………if he changed nics after that would be be able to tell?
“If you feel that endangering my sister’s life to predators who might read this blog is part of the blog system, then I know that you understand nothing.”
——–
Which is it, Regular? Is a person who uses their own identity here endangering their life (or their families lives), or being brave?
Don’t we all have families? So, if Apophis doesn’t use his own true full name for reasons which may include wanting his family left out of this “endangering” business, he is a coward?
Because you used several nics and denied such, it sent people searching for the truth and lots was found. When all the time if you had just been responsible for every post, under every nic, no one would have looked for anything.
You remade yourself so often you became a target. You could have early on said, “Yes, I am JM, Eier…” Instead you let others dig, and look and find more than they would have even bothered to look for. If you had been truthful, others wouldn’t have spent a second trying to find anything. If you desire to become a different poster in the future you’ll need to be more — different.
If what you want here on this blog is to know who everyone is, start your own digging. Start your own “outing.” Post whatever it is you think would allow you to “get even.”
Leave those who have different reasons for blogging out of it! I don’t plan to participate.
Hay Barack? Look around.
Biden is a good choice. HE knows how to fight this con trash.
#
Regular
Posted August 16, 2008 at 9:53 am | Permalink
It’s not name calling.
It’s putting my sister’s personal information on the Web. She doesn’t even know how to work a computer.
Yet, no one steps up and condemns it.
If you feel that endangering my sister’s life to predators who might read this blog is part of the blog system, then I know that you understand nothing.
_________________________________________________
Oh, BOO HOO! Poor little Regular.
I guess that’s what happens when you’re the blog a$$hole.
Unless I’ve missed something, this happened a long time ago. Get over it.
(snickers)
#
lindainks55
Posted August 16, 2008 at 10:16 am | Permalink
“If you feel that endangering my sister’s life to predators who might read this blog is part of the blog system, then I know that you understand nothing.”
——–
Which is it, Regular? Is a person who uses their own identity here endangering their life (or their families lives), or being brave?
Don’t we all have families? So, if Apophis doesn’t use his own true full name for reasons which may include wanting his family left out of this “endangering” business, he is a coward?
Because you used several nics and denied such, it sent people searching for the truth and lots was found. When all the time if you had just been responsible for every post, under every nic, no one would have looked for anything.
You remade yourself so often you became a target. You could have early on said, “Yes, I am JM, Eier…” Instead you let others dig, and look and find more than they would have even bothered to look for. If you had been truthful, others wouldn’t have spent a second trying to find anything. If you desire to become a different poster in the future you’ll need to be more — different.
If what you want here on this blog is to know who everyone is, start your own digging. Start your own “outing.” Post whatever it is you think would allow you to “get even.”
Leave those who have different reasons for blogging out of it! I don’t plan to participate.
——————————
So, it’s justified in your mind. Whatever happens to my family is justified in your mind.
If you don’t think it’s threatening, post your family’s name and address on here and let it be repeated ever so often over the next two years.
Irrelevant you say? Yet, that’s exactly what your Lib buddies are doing to me.
I wonder how these Libs would like it if I posted the names of their wives and home addresses on this blog?
You would hear hollering from here to Alaska.
There is no excuse for what they done, yet you provide them with one lindainks.
Welcome to the new Kansas State Law on stalking. What they are doing is criminal and punishable under the law.
Of course, lindainks thinks it’s justifiable.
#
XXX
Posted August 16, 2008 at 10:22 am | Permalink
#
Regular
Posted August 16, 2008 at 9:53 am | Permalink
It’s not name calling.
It’s putting my sister’s personal information on the Web. She doesn’t even know how to work a computer.
Yet, no one steps up and condemns it.
If you feel that endangering my sister’s life to predators who might read this blog is part of the blog system, then I know that you understand nothing.
_________________________________________________
Oh, BOO HOO! Poor little Regular.
I guess that’s what happens when you’re the blog a$$hole.
Unless I’ve missed something, this happened a long time ago. Get over it.
(snickers)
—————————
Boo hoo.
Post your wife’s full name on here and her address where she lives.
See how you like it XXX.
You will be the one boo-hooing.
Heh heh
BlueJay sings…..I always feel like somebody’s watching you….
#
Regular
Posted August 16, 2008 at 10:26 am | Permalink
—————————
Boo hoo.
Post your wife’s full name on here and her address where she lives.
See how you like it XXX.
You will be the one boo-hooing.
_________________________________________________
Ah Regular, so easy to get a rise out of.
Why would I post information about my wife? I post under XXX because I KNOW the dangers of putting out personal information on the internet. But if you really want to know who I am or who my wife is, ask around. A lot of posters (including conservatives) on these threads know who I am.
I haven’t, nor will I ever “out” anybody on this blog. It’s not in my nature. But in your case you asked for it. You begged for it.
That’s just one of the drawbacks of being the blog a$$hole.
(snickers)
DFNTT
Dumb nuts failed toilet training?
I can’t even do that one right! But, again, I got to laugh! You’re good this morning, beber!
DNFTT
I’ll go back to just IGNORE. Works for me.
Goddamned dyslexia; I’m also autistic. So not only am I fascinated with numbers, I get them backwards.
Biden can remember his lines, too, even if he has to plagiarize:
“Kinnock (original)
Why am I the first Kinnock in a thousand generations to be able to get to university? Why is Glenys the first woman in her family in a thousand generations to be able to get to university?
Was it because our predecessors were thick? Does anybody really think that they didn’t get what we had because they didn’t have the talent or the strength or the endurance or the commitment? Of course not. It was because there was no platform upon which they could stand.
Biden
I started thinking as I was coming over here, why is it that Joe Biden is the first in his family ever to go to a university? Why is it that my wife who is sitting out there in the audience is the first in her family to ever go to college?
Is it because our fathers and mothers were not bright? . . . No, it’s not because they weren’t as smart. It’s not because they didn’t work as hard. It’s because they didn’t have a platform upon which to stand . . .
http://nutsandbolts.washcoll.edu/plagiarism.html
I use to know who a lot of the nics were. Several emailed me a while ago in support of my efforts to clean up the BLOG.
I’ve deleted them, and frankly, I’m an old guy. I’ve forgotten most of their names.
If one chooses to post under a nic they shouldn’t get personal with their comments. I can respect someone wanting to be anonymous, but they shouldn’t insult some one personally by their real name.
They also shouldn’t hide behind a nic to be profane. That’s just cowardly.
#
XXX
Posted August 16, 2008 at 9:29 am | Permalink
Biden is probably a fairly sensible choice for VP. He’s used to losing.
______________________________________________
Now that’s funny, I don’t care who you are!
Did you hear about the dyslexic agnostic insomniac?
He stayed up all night wondering if there was a Dog.
HLP
Posted August 16, 2008 at 9:55 am | Permalink
Well, Regular,
Apophis is a second rate middle school hack. He’s given enough personal information about himself that if some one cared enough they could find him by noon today.
Let’s see, he claims to be union delegate to the NEA convention. How many did we send, 8 to 12? Let’s say 12. How many were men? Half? That leaves six. How many of the six are such losers that they are middle aged middle school science teachers? I’d say one.
Yep, if the little ol’ coward Apophis ever threatened me with physical violence like the wimp junior does on occasion I think I’d send his wife some flowers. Just so he knew I could reach out and touch him!
************************************************************************
For the record old man price, there were 19 delegates from Wichita at the NEA convention. There may have actually been more than that were representing the suburban districts. Nine of those delegates were men.
Now, if you think I am such a poor educator, then prove it. Otherwise STFU old man.
That little tirade about “physical violence” was uncalled for. That is not my way, but I’m able to defend myself from anyone including YOU and your nutcase boy. YOU are one person who carries firearms and brags about using them on people. It is YOU who crows about the superiority of anyone who has served in the military. Old man, I think it is YOU and your addled boy who are prone to violence.
You do not intimidate me in the least old man. If you THINK you can identify me, go for it. That would actually accomplish NOTHING because there is nothing you could do with that information.
I can take care of myself.
NITWIT
[chortles]
#
XXX
Posted August 16, 2008 at 10:57 am | Permalink
#
Regular
Posted August 16, 2008 at 10:26 am | Permalink
—————————
Boo hoo.
Post your wife’s full name on here and her address where she lives.
See how you like it XXX.
You will be the one boo-hooing.
_________________________________________________
Ah Regular, so easy to get a rise out of.
Why would I post information about my wife? I post under XXX because I KNOW the dangers of putting out personal information on the internet. But if you really want to know who I am or who my wife is, ask around. A lot of posters (including conservatives) on these threads know who I am.
I haven’t, nor will I ever “out” anybody on this blog. It’s not in my nature. But in your case you asked for it. You begged for it.
That’s just one of the drawbacks of being the blog a$$hole.
(snickers)
—————————-
Since when did I ask for my sister’s address and email be posted on this blog?
Guess since it hasn’t happened to you, it doesn’t matter does it?
Your sense of justice is perverted.
#
Regular
Posted August 16, 2008 at 12:53 pm | Permalink
Since when did I ask for my sister’s address and email be posted on this blog?
Guess since it hasn’t happened to you, it doesn’t matter does it?
Your sense of justice is perverted.
_______________________________________________
Sometimes our actions have profound effects on others, as in this case. Not saying it’s fair, but you’re such a blog a$$hole, you brought this action on yourself. If you were a reasonable person, this wouldn’t have happened. It hasn’t happened to anyone else. That should tell you something.
You’re the blog a$$hole.
(snickers)
#
XXX
Posted August 16, 2008 at 1:12 pm | Permalink
#
Regular
Posted August 16, 2008 at 12:53 pm | Permalink
Since when did I ask for my sister’s address and email be posted on this blog?
Guess since it hasn’t happened to you, it doesn’t matter does it?
Your sense of justice is perverted.
_______________________________________________
Sometimes our actions have profound effects on others, as in this case. Not saying it’s fair, but you’re such a blog a$$hole, you brought this action on yourself. If you were a reasonable person, this wouldn’t have happened. It hasn’t happened to anyone else. That should tell you something.
You’re the blog a$$hole.
(snickers)
———————
Maybe next time I won’t extend my sympathies and prayers for you and your misses when you had your motorcycle accident.
Perhaps it would have been better if your wife’s skull was cracked open like an egg. You’ve might have learned some humility.
#
Regular
Posted August 16, 2008 at 1:17 pm | Permalink
———————
Maybe next time I won’t extend my sympathies and prayers for you and your misses when you had your motorcycle accident.
Perhaps it would have been better if your wife’s skull was cracked open like an egg. You’ve might have learned some humility.
________________________________________________
Oh! I am truly mortified! Does this mean that my wife and I aren’t on your Christmas list?
Your response reinforces what I’ve said. You’re the blog a$$hole.
(snickers)
#
XXX
Posted August 16, 2008 at 1:28 pm | Permalink
#
Regular
Posted August 16, 2008 at 1:17 pm | Permalink
———————
Maybe next time I won’t extend my sympathies and prayers for you and your misses when you had your motorcycle accident.
Perhaps it would have been better if your wife’s skull was cracked open like an egg. You’ve might have learned some humility.
________________________________________________
Oh! I am truly mortified! Does this mean that my wife and I aren’t on your Christmas list?
Your response reinforces what I’ve said. You’re the blog a$$hole.
(snickers)
———————
No, you’ve just demonstrated through your last several posts that you are the blog a$$hole.
Thanks for proving my point.
#
Regular
Posted August 16, 2008 at 1:32 pm | Permalink
———————
No, you’ve just demonstrated through your last several posts that you are the blog a$$hole.
Thanks for proving my point.
________________________________________________
Poor Regular. Can’t even come up with something original.
Imitation is the Greatest Form of Flattery.
You’re still the blog a$$hole.
(snickers)
I’m predicting personal disaster in your life.
Enjoy.
#
Regular
Posted August 16, 2008 at 1:38 pm | Permalink
I’m predicting personal disaster in your life.
Enjoy.
_______________________________________________
OOOOOOOOh, is that a threat? Or did you look into your Christal Ball to come up with that?
What a fine Christian attitude.
More proof that you’re the blog a$$hole.
And by the way, Regular, just to show you the difference between people like you and me, I wish only the best for you. I hope that something so good happens in your life that you no longer feel the need to be the blog a$$hole.
(snickers)
#
XXX
Posted August 16, 2008 at 1:49 pm | Permalink
And by the way, Regular, just to show you the difference between people like you and me, I wish only the best for you. I hope that something so good happens in your life that you no longer feel the need to be the blog a$$hole.
(snickers)
——————-
No you don’t.
And I meant what I said.
die.
#
Regular
Posted August 16, 2008 at 2:07 pm | Permalink
——————-
No you don’t.
And I meant what I said.
die.
_______________________________________________
Die?
My goodness, what a creepy attitude.
I on the other hand wish you a fine day. May you be the best blog a$$hole you can be.
(snickers)
LOL,
Pretty big talk for a nic.
“Now, if you think I am such a poor educator, then prove it. Otherwise STFU old man.”
Or what?
You’ve made a lot of assertions about my boy and me, care to back them up in the real world? Or just hide behind your nic, brave man?
……old man, I guess the “or what” will be you (and your addled boy) lack of credibilty here.
By the way old man, how old is the Earth?
[chortles]
your*………………dropped an “r”
BlueJay gets on the PA system…
“Clean up on the Biden thread.”
Watch out X. Maybe he’s gonna rain toads on your house or something!
By the way old man, how old is the Earth?
[chortles]
Well, after very careful calculations, I have actually determine that it’s two weeks older than the last time you asked me.
nitwit
………….[chortles]
………………..ah come on old man price, tell us all again how old you (and your addled boy) REALLY think the Earth is.
Please, please, PLEASE show the blog your level of ignorance!
nitwit
This is like “shooting fish in a barrell”.
……..’cept, it isn’t the “shooting” that kills the fish…………………….
………….have to get out and finish cutting the grass, I’ll be back latter for more fun and games with the family of ignorants.
[chortles]
#
BlueJay
Posted August 16, 2008 at 2:41 pm | Permalink
BlueJay gets on the PA system…
“Clean up on the Biden thread.”
Watch out X. Maybe he’s gonna rain toads on your house or something!
________________________________________________
So does that mean he’s going to drop his relatives on my roof?
BJ, I get the impression that Regular isn’t down to his usual level today. Do you suppose something is bothering the guy?
When problems get me down, I find it helpful to discuss with my friends.
Oops! Never mind.
(snickers)
“Regular” gives us rational CONservative rhetoric with –
“…I meant what I said.
die.”
You’ve got no evidence, no logic, no rational argument. All you’ve got is the hope you can make others die.
Of course you’re such a pathetic impotent nut-case you can’t actually achieve anything.
You’ve become as absurd a character as the Wicked Witch of the West. Your skin is probably green and (if reports on your personal hygiene are any evidence) you’re afraid of water.
I especially prefer Richardson because he doesn’t take a Democratic vote out of the Senate.
He’s also Hispanic.
I’ll take either one and be happy. I see no reason for Obama to choose a woman. We need someone who will do the job, not just pull in votes, and there are more men who fit that description than the few women I’ve seen mentioned. (Sandra Day O’Connor, not among them.) While I’ve often said that a woman in the WH would be, not only refreshing, but beneficial, I wouldn’t vote for a woman on those grounds only.
Chas,
If you have a lot of sinus problems, get thee to a pharmacy and buy and use a peti pot.
Answer: “The important thing is, he’s fun to listen to and isn’t boring.” -Scholfield
————–
Question: What do Democratic biased opinion blog editors value most in a vice-presidential candidate?
Easter Bunny, Chas: For sinus problems, I have found this to be lot of help.
http://www.neilmed.com/usa/sinusrinse.php
Today Biden Yesterday JFK’s daughter? Why would he choose another Senator and one who’s a lifelong Washington hack at that. And Regular if you dont want people posting personal information about you dont post it for people to see, that precisely why most people on the blog use a Nic
One Trackback
[...] board meeting, the board members in attendance offered their predictions: Randy Scholfield is sticking with Joe Biden. Richard Crowson said Sebelius. Mark McCormick said Sam Nunn. And I went with Evan [...]