WE Blog

Chas
Posted June 30, 2008 at 3:01 am | Permalink

“You are one of the biggest liars here!! I do not swear at posters — Just another one of your lies”

http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-629-2/#comment-376050

Chas
Posted June 28, 2008 at 9:08 pm | Permalink

“I DONT THINK SO BITCH!!!”

http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-628-2/#comment-375452

Chas
Posted June 30, 2008 at 3:01 am | Permalink
“I do not swear at posters”

Chas
Posted May 8, 2008 at 6:47 pm | Permalink
Yep… as suspected — Nothing of substance from James when cornered — Just stupid goddam ad hominem bullshit!!! Just as always!!
JERK!!!

Chas
Posted June 30, 2008 at 3:01 am | Permalink
“I do not swear at posters”

#
Chas
Posted July 3, 2008 at 7:16 am | Permalink

Of course Tiller has an interest in each case… But the SECOND physician is independent of Tiller…. Ya cant spin that one, McDumbscheis… Tray another one??

Keep spinning, DumbScheis… Maybe you will get dizzy, and fall out of your chair… LOL

Chas
Posted June 30, 2008 at 3:01 am | Permalink
“I do not swear at posters”

Chas
Posted May 8, 2008 at 6:47 pm | Permalink
Yep… as suspected — Nothing of substance from James when cornered — Just stupid goddam ad hominem bullshit!!! Just as always!!
JERK!!!

NEW YORK (Associated Press) — Rush Limbaugh will make about $38 million a year to continue his radio show over the next eight years. In addition, he says will be getting a nine-figure signing bonus from Premiere Radio Networks.

Shame!!!! But shows that if he can get a job regular should be able to get one too …… both mindless idiots who’s only goal in life is to encourage small mindedness and create a division in our society —- how so very unpatriotic —- happy independence day regular -

Please excuse my ignorance, but the question I have is why anyone who is not a believer in the faith would want to be tied down with “Marriage”?
Have you considered all the pros and cons of the marriage contract?
I believe that most of the major pros can be taken care of with contracts. Here are a few of the cons you might want to consider if you are not a believer of the Christian faith.
1. Right off you have the marriage income tax penalty
2. You are liable for you marriage partner debt.
3. This is a big one – .If your marriage partner becomes disabled, you would have to spend down your assets before they can get Medicaid to pay for the nursing home.
Why would anyone, straight or gay that is not of the faith want to have all the disadvantages of marriage?

Interesting question Right Angle. I always thought of marriage as a public declaration with associated legal rights.

Monkeyhawk
Posted July 3, 2008 at 6:09 am | Permalink
I realize the above multi-post is somehow meaningful for you, “Nathaniel.”

But I’ve forgotten your point.

Do you have one?
========================================

He has two points, M-H >>>>

1) Just plain bully-style harassment…

2) To do his best to be obnoxious.

Nuff said…

Just to lighten things up a bit, by request:

I work down at the Pizza Pit
And I drive an old Hyundai
I still live with my mom and dad
I’m 5 foot 3 and overweight
I’m a scifi fanatic
A mild asthmatic
And I’ve never been to second base
But there’s whole ‘nother me
That you need to see
Go checkout MySpace

‘Cause online I’m out in Hollywood
I’m 6 foot 5 and I look damn good
I drive a Maserati
I’m a black-belt in karate
And I love a good glass of wine
It turns girls on that I’m mysterious
I tell them I don’t want nothing serious
‘Cause even on a slow day
I could have a three way
Chat with two women at one time
I’m so much cooler online
So much cooler online

When I get home I kiss my mom
And she fixes me a snack
And I head down to my basement bedroom
And fire under my yak
In real life the only time I’ve ever even been to L.A
Is when I got the chance with the marching band
To play tuba in the Rose Parade

Online I live in Malibu
I pose for Calvin Klein, I’ve been in GQ
I’m single and I’m rich
And I’ve got a set of six pack abs that would blow your mind
It turns girls on that I’m mysterious
I tell them I don’t want nothing serious
‘Cause even on a slow day
I could have a three way
Chat with two women at one time
I’m so much cooler online
Yeah, I’m cooler online

When you got my kind of stats
It’s hard to get a date
Let alone a real girlfriend
But I grow another foot and I lose a bunch of weight
Every time I login

Online
I’m out in Hollywood
I’m 6 foot 5 and I look damn good
Even on a slow day
I could have a three way
Chat with two women at one time
I’m so much cooler online
Yeah, I’m cooler online
I’m so much cooler online
Yeah, I’m cooler online

Yeah, I’m cooler online

Yeah, I’ll see ya online

Hey Mary — Name of Song? Composer?? Please??

So right angle, why do STRAIGHT people want to be married? I mean, if it’s such a bad deal and all?

Jesus WEPT!

The shark called. He wants you to give his back a rest over the fourth….

Whether or not you agree with Dr. Ron Paul and his views. You have to admit that this speech is spot on. His understanding of money and economics is unmatched in Congress. Enjoy.

Something Big is Going On

The following statement is written by Congressman Paul about the pending financial disaster. He will introduce this statement as a special order and insert it into the Congressional Record next week. Fortunately, we have the opportunity to debut it first on the Campaign for Liberty blog. It reads as follows:

I have, for the past 35 years, expressed my grave concern for the future of America. The course we have taken over the past century has threatened our liberties, security and prosperity. In spite of these long-held concerns, I have days—growing more frequent all the time—when I’m convinced the time is now upon us that some Big Events are about to occur. These fast-approaching events will not go unnoticed. They will affect all of us. They will not be limited to just some areas of our country. The world economy and political system will share in the chaos about to be unleashed.

Though the world has long suffered from the senselessness of wars that should have been avoided, my greatest fear is that the course on which we find ourselves will bring even greater conflict and economic suffering to the innocent people of the world—unless we quickly change our ways.

America, with her traditions of free markets and property rights, led the way toward great wealth and progress throughout the world as well as at home. Since we have lost our confidence in the principles of liberty, self reliance, hard work and frugality, and instead took on empire building, financed through inflation and debt, all this has changed. This is indeed frightening and an historic event.

The problem we face is not new in history. Authoritarianism has been around a long time. For centuries, inflation and debt have been used by tyrants to hold power, promote aggression, and provide “bread and circuses” for the people. The notion that a country can afford “guns and butter” with no significant penalty existed even before the 1960s when it became a popular slogan. It was then, though, we were told the Vietnam War and a massive expansion of the welfare state were not problems. The seventies proved that assumption wrong.

Today things are different from even ancient times or the 1970s. There is something to the argument that we are now a global economy. The world has more people and is more integrated due to modern technology, communications, and travel. If modern technology had been used to promote the ideas of liberty, free markets, sound money and trade, it would have ushered in a new golden age—a globalism we could accept.
Instead, the wealth and freedom we now enjoy are shrinking and rest upon a fragile philosophic infrastructure. It is not unlike the levies and bridges in our own country that our system of war and welfare has caused us to ignore.

I’m fearful that my concerns have been legitimate and may even be worse than I first thought. They are now at our doorstep. Time is short for making a course correction before this grand experiment in liberty goes into deep hibernation.

There are reasons to believe this coming crisis is different and bigger than the world has ever experienced. Instead of using globalism in a positive fashion, it’s been used to globalize all of the mistakes of the politicians, bureaucrats and central bankers.

Being an unchallenged sole superpower was never accepted by us with a sense of humility and respect. Our arrogance and aggressiveness have been used to promote a world empire backed by the most powerful army of history. This type of globalist intervention creates problems for all citizens of the world and fails to contribute to the well-being of the world’s populations. Just think how our personal liberties have been trashed here at home in the last decade.

The financial crisis, still in its early stages, is apparent to everyone: gasoline prices over $4 a gallon; skyrocketing education and medical-care costs; the collapse of the housing bubble; the bursting of the NASDAQ bubble; stockmarkets plunging; unemployment rising;, massive underemployment; excessive government debt; and unmanageable personal debt. Little doubt exists as to whether we’ll get stagflation. The question that will soon be asked is: When will the stagflation become an inflationary depression?

There are various reasons that the world economy has been globalized and the problems we face are worldwide. We cannot understand what we’re facing without understanding fiat money and the long-developing dollar bubble.

There were several stages. From the inception of the Federal Reserve System in 1913 to 1933, the Central Bank established itself as the official dollar manager. By 1933, Americans could no longer own gold, thus removing restraint on the Federal Reserve to inflate for war and welfare.

By 1945, further restraints were removed by creating the Bretton-Woods Monetary System making the dollar the reserve currency of the world. This system lasted up until 1971. During the period between 1945 and 1971, some restraints on the Fed remained in place. Foreigners, but not Americans, could convert dollars to gold at $35 an ounce. Due to the excessive dollars being created, that system came to an end in 1971.

It’s the post Bretton-Woods system that was responsible for globalizing inflation and markets and for generating a gigantic worldwide dollar bubble. That bubble is now bursting, and we’re seeing what it’s like to suffer the consequences of the many previous economic errors.

Ironically in these past 35 years, we have benefited from this very flawed system. Because the world accepted dollars as if they were gold, we only had to counterfeit more dollars, spend them overseas (indirectly encouraging our jobs to go overseas as well) and enjoy unearned prosperity. Those who took our dollars and gave us goods and services were only too anxious to loan those dollars back to us. This allowed us to export our inflation and delay the consequences we now are starting to see.

But it was never destined to last, and now we have to pay the piper. Our huge foreign debt must be paid or liquidated. Our entitlements are coming due just as the world has become more reluctant to hold dollars. The consequence of that decision is price inflation in this country—and that’s what we are witnessing today. Already price inflation overseas is even higher than here at home as a consequence of foreign central bank’s willingness to monetize our debt.

Printing dollars over long periods of time may not immediately push prices up–yet in time it always does. Now we’re seeing catch-up for past inflating of the monetary supply. As bad as it is today with $4 a gallon gasoline, this is just the beginning. It’s a gross distraction to hound away at “drill, drill, drill” as a solution to the dollar crisis and high gasoline prices. Its okay to let the market increase supplies and drill, but that issue is a gross distraction from the sins of deficits and Federal Reserve monetary shenanigans.

This bubble is different and bigger for another reason. The central banks of the world secretly collude to centrally plan the world economy. I’m convinced that agreements among central banks to “monetize” U.S. debt these past 15 years have existed, although secretly and out of the reach of any oversight of anyone—especially the U.S. Congress that doesn’t care, or just flat doesn’t understand. As this “gift” to us comes to an end, our problems worsen. The central banks and the various governments are very powerful, but eventually the markets overwhelm when the people who get stuck holding the bag (of bad dollars) catch on and spend the dollars into the economy with emotional zeal, thus igniting inflationary fever.

This time—since there are so many dollars and so many countries involved—the Fed has been able to “paper” over every approaching crisis for the past 15 years, especially with Alan Greenspan as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, which has allowed the bubble to become history’s greatest.

The mistakes made with excessive credit at artificially low rates are huge, and the market is demanding a correction. This involves excessive debt, misdirected investments, over-investments, and all the other problems caused by the government when spending the money they should never have had. Foreign militarism, welfare handouts and $80 trillion entitlement promises are all coming to an end. We don’t have the money or the wealth-creating capacity to catch up and care for all the needs that now exist because we rejected the market economy, sound money, self reliance and the principles of liberty.

Since the correction of all this misallocation of resources is necessary and must come, one can look for some good that may come as this “Big Even” unfolds.

There are two choices that people can make. The one choice that is unavailable to us is to limp along with the status quo and prop up the system with more debt, inflation and lies. That won’t happen.

One of the two choices, and the one chosen so often by government in the past is that of rejecting the principles of liberty and resorting to even bigger and more authoritarian government. Some argue that giving dictatorial powers to the President, just as we have allowed him to run the American empire, is what we should do. That’s the great danger, and in this post-911 atmosphere, too many Americans are seeking safety over freedom. We have already lost too many of our personal liberties already. Real fear of economic collapse could prompt central planners to act to such a degree that the New Deal of the 30’s might look like Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence.

The more the government is allowed to do in taking over and running the economy, the deeper the depression gets and the longer it lasts. That was the story of the 30ss and the early 40s, and the same mistakes are likely to be made again if we do not wake up.

But the good news is that it need not be so bad if we do the right thing. I saw “Something Big” happening in the past 18 months on the campaign trail. I was encouraged that we are capable of waking up and doing the right thing. I have literally met thousands of high school and college kids who are quite willing to accept the challenge and responsibility of a free society and reject the cradle-to-grave welfare that is promised them by so many do-good politicians.

If more hear the message of liberty, more will join in this effort. The failure of our foreign policy, welfare system, and monetary policies and virtually all government solutions are so readily apparent, it doesn’t take that much convincing. But the positive message of how freedom works and why it’s possible is what is urgently needed.

One of the best parts of accepting self reliance in a free society is that true personal satisfaction with one’s own life can be achieved. This doesn’t happen when the government assumes the role of guardian, parent or provider, because it eliminates a sense of pride. But the real problem is the government can’t provide the safety and economic security that it claims. The so-called good that government claims it can deliver is always achieved at the expense of someone else’s freedom. It’s a failed system and the young people know it.

Restoring a free society doesn’t eliminate the need to get our house in order and to pay for the extravagant spending. But the pain would not be long-lasting if we did the right things, and best of all the empire would have to end for financial reasons. Our wars would stop, the attack on civil liberties would cease, and prosperity would return. The choices are clear: it shouldn’t be difficult, but the big event now unfolding gives us a great opportunity to reverse the tide and resume the truly great American Revolution started in 1776. Opportunity knocks in spite of the urgency and the dangers we face.

Let’s make “Something Big is Happening” be the discovery that freedom works and is popular and the big economic and political event we’re witnessing is a blessing in disguise.

Hank, my story is from a number of years back, IF you even bothered to read it…

AND, if you look at the sales, you can still get one of them for under $600…. IF you have $600 for a suit… I know I dont…

I reckon the BS is on Hank this time :-D

ksfarmgrrl
Posted July 3, 2008 at 9:46 am | Permalink
So right angle, why do STRAIGHT people want to be married? I mean, if it’s such a bad deal and all?

===============================================
Sorry but that was my question which I have not received a reply for yet “Why would anyone, STRAIGHT or gay that is not of the faith want to have all the disadvantages of marriage?”

What Thanks ksfarmgrrl,

I will look at them but can not most of them be had with agreements.

What prompted this question is that I can not get long term care insurance. In order to not have to spend down my estate and leave my wife whom I love dearly in poverty because I had to spend it on long term care, and if God in his infinite wisdom does not see fit to take me quickly when the time comes, I would consider a divorce to preserve the money for her.

I hope that will be years away, Just looking ahead.

Yes Chas.,

I got the point of your original post. I merely tried to inject a little humor to make my point. Obviously you didn’t get my point or chose to ignore it.

I find it ironic that the biggest Christian basher on the BLOG is able to be viewed as the victim of Christians bashing him.

Tedious. The profane, phoney and predictability of your posts are becoming tedious.

Furthermore, where do you find any Christian Bashing?? huh???

I would quite agree, Rage…

I think it’s time we acknowledged the obvious: that only marriage between a man in a woman, attended by a qualified High Priestess, is considered a valid marriage in the eyes of Satan.

That’s why it’s legal, and same-sex marriage is not. I’m certain all the good Christians in attendance will agree with me 100%. Not obeying the word of Satan will surely have distastrous consequences for our society!

/sarcasm off

ksfarmgrrl
Posted July 3, 2008 at 11:48 am | Permalink
RA, Kansas has what is known as a “spousal impoverishment” provision. Look it up.
================================
Yes, I am aware of that but even that would not let my wife retain anything even close to 50% of our estate which I feel that she should be entitled to.

MonkeyHawk,

The point?

Hmmmm….

Well, I simply can’t remember if Chas has EVER admitted to either being wrong on this blog or if he has even attempted to apologize for the rude things he says.

The other night he was talking about how someone should be ashamed. I asked him, as a Christian Minister, if he even knew the meaning of the word based on his language and attitude on this blog.

As usual, Chas acted like he had no clue what I was talking about. I told him that he swears at posters all the time here. He then said:

“You are one of the biggest liars here!! I do not swear at posters — Just another one of your lies”

http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-629-2/#comment-376050

Other posters and myself have now shown how Chas has swore at posters many times.

In his usual Chas style, he says that he still has not swore at posters. This coming from the guy who said that his use of STFU was actually “stnad the floor up.”

At some point, even you MonkeyHawk, have to admit what a liar Chas is.

The point is that Chas called me a liar for something which is so plainly clear.

Until Chas takes back his calling me a liar and apologizes for calling that person a “BI#%$” I will continue to remind him of his posts.

Grow up boy!!

oh yea, excuse me…. Please grow up boy…

AND…. while you are at it, knock off the stupid harassment… :roll:

Get the log out of your own eye Nathan.

Chas,

You think you can call people liars when they are not and then act like it never happened.

I am simply going to remind you of this till you own up to it.

Heck Nathan, Chas even lies about lying!

And so his lies continue to pile up, in the countless bin of the WE Blog.

SSDD

The word is also not a term of endearment… And when used, not intended to be…

Nathaniel,

Are you going to do the four points I posted? LOL!

http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/07/open-thread-702/#comment-377191

And does “98.5%” equal “perfectly capable”?

Chas,

How is calling some a Bitch not profane?

Cosmos I’m glad I ran into you today. While reading Drudge I became very alarmed and needed your advise:

“Due to pending disasters predicted because of global warming, government scientists are urging the creation of a new Earth Systems Science Agency — by merging the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the U.S. Geological Survey…

‘The United States faces unprecedented environmental and economic challenges in the decades ahead,’ the group warns. ‘Foremost among them will be climate change, sea-level rise, altered weather patterns, declines in freshwater availability and quality and loss of biodiversity’… Developing…

Flat screen TVs blamed for accelerating global warming… ”

I am calling on all bloggers especially those on the left to get rid of their flat screens now. Do your part for GW. Finally something we can all do.

MonkeyHawk,

I find it annoying that Chas can do or say anything here and is never held accountable for it. Chas is never wrong and never owns up to anything he does here.

In the past you have had no problem letting me know what you think of me as a poster here with all of your insults. Do you think that because you continue to insult me now, that it is somehow different?

I know what kind of Marine I am and my posting here doesn’t demean that in anyones eyes except those that have already determined to see me as demeaned long before this.

If that is how you want to continue to act here, fine.

I choose not to.

Chas won’t be held accountable until a member of his congregations sees this website AND makes the connection.

http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profanity

And on this holiday weekend, a little reminder about the eeeeeevils of bottled water.

Support your local industries! Buy and use a Coleman JUG!!!!!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389×3558824

Forgot the quotes on that first paragraph, that was the post from Chas I was responding to.

Thank you Nathan, for your post above that proves you are a liar… Whether YOU like it or not, I AM a Christian… AND, whether YOU like it or not, I am not a phony minister… (you might have used the term “fake” minister — same differrence)

Now, if you want PROOF, contact Phillip Brownlee… The Eagle has a copy of my credentials… You want to call the Eagle liars too???

NOW, do you still want to say you are not a liar??? When you just now proved you ARE??

Yeah Nathan.

Chas has a piece of paper that SAYS he is a Christian!

And I’m a Secret Agent Man. (Paper Card in my wallet to prove it!)

Nathaniel
Posted July 3, 2008 at 2:00 pm | Permalink
Chas,

How is calling some a Bitch not profane?
=========================================

Intentionally irritating??? Yep…

Profane??? Nawwwww not profane…

Get a LIFE Nathan!!!

MAX — I see your keepers let you out of your padded room today… must be for the holidays… GET A LIFE, MAX!!!

Nathan,

He’s obviously afraid to admit to his congregation that he posts on the WE Blog as “Chas”.

Nothin for him to be proud about on this web site.

The Phony Preachers are harmful though, so to point out his numerous weaknesses and contradictions is the right thing to do.

Chas brought up his alledged credentials after all, since he has no credibility thru his own words.

Since he brought it up on the blog, it’s fair to challenge him on it.

Course Nathan,

You have to assume that anyone reads the WE Blog, and that people are stupid enough to actually believe Chas.

I’m certain the numbers for both are very low.

Nathaniel
Posted July 3, 2008 at 2:48 pm | Permalink
Chas,

That doesn’t prove I am a liar. It proves that I disagree with you calling yourself a Christian.
===============================================

Nathan, it DOES prove you are a liar!! How can you think that you have the mind of GOD to disagree with ANYbody who says they are a Christian??

That is just about real close to being blasphemy against the Holy Spirit!!

See, Nathan, you may be allowed to THINK somebody isnt a Christian… But when that person TELLS you that, and you disagree, then YOU are the liar… That isnt something you can disagree about… Not in THIS part of reality!!

By the way, I have been meaning to ask you…. Does Satan believe in Jesus Christ??

MonkeyHawk,

Show me how the Marine Corps is enlisting highschool dropouts and excons.

Then show me how they would rather do that than my going back to active duty.

I know you can’t, you are just trying to protect your buddy Chas because he has himself in a pickle again.

Perhaps if Chas didn’t call people Bitches and A$$holes and then act like it is not profane and call people liars who say he is swearing at posters he wouldn’t get himself into the hole to begin with.

Of course you would never say anything to Chas about that, at least not publically.

Perhaps you might mention something to him via email.

Then you wouldn’t have to think you need to protect him so much by being so vulgar yourself.

Chas I am sure you are familiar with this passage of scripture. Now Monkey says he doesn’t understand what Nathan is saying but you do because you have those ‘papers’.
—————————–
“Many” are going to appear before the Lord “in that day” who sought to enter in at the strait gate through a false intimate association with the Lord. They will have performed works, supposedly in the Lord’s name; and the Lord, “in that day,” will reveal to them that He had nothing to do with these works.

In Matthew 7:23 the Lord’s negative response pertains to two things: 1) entrance into the kingdom (v. 21), and 2) miraculous works (v. 22). Here the Lord declared that certain individuals will appear in His presence “in that day” who will seek admittance into the kingdom of the heavens on the basis of an intimate association with Him, wrought through having previously performed miraculous works.

The Lord though will say, “I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity ['lawlessness']” (v. 23). The Lord will state that He had nothing to do with these works, and He will refuse to recognize those who had involved themselves in such works relative to the matter at hand—entrance into the kingdom.”
————————-
I don’t pretend to be anyones judge; certainly not yours. But I am aware of what these words mean.

Chas,

When you use the word A$$whole, everyone knows exactly what you are trying to say even though you didn’t spell it out.

Chas,

I don’t say I have the mind of God. I don’t disagree with anyone who says they are a Christian.

I disagree with you saying you are a Christian.

Do you even believe in Satan? If you do, will anyone spend eternity with him in hell and what do you think will be the factor in that?

Oh for god’s sakes will you two stop it.

Political Mama,

Do you like people calling you a Bitch? Do you call people that and think it is not profane?

littlejohn,

I didn’t even bring it up….

Yes I do consider it profane. And of course I would be irked if someone called me that.

But you can’t admit when you’re wrong most of the time either. So just stop it!

Pmom sorry I added to this but I am the person he is calling a bitch. He has no right to call me that. Sorry you don’t see the wrong here when you were incensed that McCain might have called his wife the ‘c’ word. At any rate I will quit with the religious posts.

SO — If God gave all of this power to Satan…. Do we oppose the will of God when we attempt to avoid Satan’s power?? Just wondering here…

I will do my best to ignore it.

Chas,

When did God give all his power to Satan?

“Christ died for our sins.”

If we don’t sin, He died for nothing.

Gonna go out and sin for awhile.

It’s Happy Hour.

okobserver, aka ksgrm,

We’re still waiting for you to post the page # and exact quote from Al Gore’s first book, to support your LIE about his wanting very high gasoline prices.

Happy 4th Ben!!

Steven, I will consider it…. However, IF I do, Nathan will then “win” in his continued efforts at being the Blog Bully, and he will once again “get his way.” If that happens, we shall none of us, ever hear the end of it…. And especially from Max, and Granny Wench, et al…. Your thoughts??

Not too far fetched a story.

Welcome to Toastmasters, June 13, 2033. That’s right: 2033.

Today Rick Campbell, one of our senior members at age 87, is here to
reminisce a bit and give us a history lesson. He says he is so old that
he learned to drive an internal combustion engine car (remember those)
with a manual transmission. He once owned a typewriter. He remembers when
bicycles had one speed, phones had two-party lines, and cameras had
something called film. As incredible as this may seem, he says that when
he was young, it was common for people to smoke in restaurants and public
places. He is from a different time; almost a different world.

I’m sure all of us are far too familiar with the tragic events of
2010, so Rick is not going to p low that fertile field again. Instead, he
is going to give us a personal look back at the conditions which led up
to that fateful year, in a speech titled “2010 Was Not A Good Year To Be
President.”

“2010 Was Not A Good Year To Be President”

Yes, 2010 was long ago and far away.

As we look back on history, it appears that some Presidents had an
easy ride- times of growth and stability. Teddy Roosevelt, Warren G.
Harding, Dwight Eisenhower, Bill Clinton come to mind. Those were good
years to be President.

Others were elected just when the Republic was facing terrible
crises: Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, George W.
Bush. They rose to the occasion, even though they were controversial and
widely hated while in office. Not such good years to be President.

Just a few years prior, in 2008, the country began foundering. We
were in the sixth year of the Iraqi Occupation, and the economy was flat.
The mainstream press clearly wanted a Democrat elected.

Although we didn’t know it until some years later, oil producing
nations had colluded to secretly buy their own oil on the open market,
driving oil prices to shocking levels above the true demand price-
reaching a high of $162 a barrel in October, 2008, just before the
general elections.

Their purpose was simple: to effect regime change in the United States.

And of course, the U.S. economy was already in a real estate slump
and also suffering the curse of stagflation; slow growth and high inflation.

There were a million home foreclosures.

Independent truckers went under by the thousands.

Airlines failed. Airlines with names now long-forgotten: United,
Delta, Northwestern, American. All now merged, of course, into the one
lone U.S. carrier we love so much: Southwest.

Against this backdrop of weariness of the war on terror, and economic
distress, the American people were ripe for a demagogue, and they
certainly got one in Barack Hussein Obama.

He and his running mate Kathleen Sibelius inspired them with vague
notions of hope and change; of a world in which diplomacy settled all
international problems, of free universal health care, of abundant
alternative energy, of peace and love.

It was a vision too good to resist.

The Republican nominee, a name you probably haven’t heard in years
anyone? Yes, it was John McCain, an obscure Senator from Arizona had no
clue how to run a national campaign, and a platform nearly as liberal as
Obama’s.

The selection of Condoleeza Rice as his running mate looked brilliant
at first. Unfortunately, black voters viewed her as white, and women
voters viewed her as one of the guys.

Even so, the McCain/Rice ticket would hav e won the election if it
weren’t for the fact that 16 percent of conservative Republicans voted
for anyone remember? That’s right, Bob Barr, another name that’s a
footnote in history.

After Obama’s narrow win, thanks to recounts in Broward County,
Florida, the country was positively giddy. A Democrat House, Senate, and
President. At last an end to gridlock in Washington. Camelot!

When Congress convened in January, 2009, the 44th President of the
United States did something unique in history: he made good on his
campaign promises.

Certainly most Americans never really thought he was serious during
the campaign. But whether because of inexperience, idealism, or simply
incompetence, he followed through.

In Obama’s first One Hundred Days, the Congress passed his
initiatives, and he signed them into law as he said he would.

He repealed the Bush tax cuts, and increased capital gains taxes.

He enacted a windfall profits tax, and instituted price controls on
gasoline and diesel fuel.

He passed universal health care, which added an additional 10 percent
tax increase on all working Americans.

He signed the Immigrant Amnesty bill which created 12 million new
citizens instantly, each with entitlements.

He closed the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, and summarily
released all the detainees.

He repealed the Patriot Act, and cut funding for espionage, and
eliminated all terrorist listening and wiretaps.

Most important, he began the complete and immediate withdrawal of all
American troops from Iraq.

He ignored the advice of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who wanted to
retain bases in Kuwait and Qatar. Instead, he went with the
recommendation of Secretary of Defense Dennis Kucinich, and ordered all
troops back to U.S. soil.

Viola! In One Hundred Days, by May of 2009, it was all done, and the
vision was complete. He did exactly what he said he would do.

And so it was in the summer of 2009 that things began to unravel for
Obama.

Of course, the economy needed a tax cut, not an increase, and
unemployment quickly rose to 12 percent. Even attorneys and economists
were put in the bread lines. Hard times.

Price controls on gasoline immediately led to shortages and gas lines.

The global cooling trend we have seen for the past 25 years first
became obvious in 2009, exposing the CO2 global warming fraud. People
were justifiably angry.

Federal deficits increased massively because thousands of baby
boomers, facing job loss and much higher taxes, simply gave up and took
social security.

Although the superb U.S. health care system was thrown into disarray,
the bright spot was the creation of the Federal Department of Health
care, and th e immediate hiring of 250,000 administrators, inspectors and
au ditors, the only job growth in any economic sector in 2009.

By February 2010, the U.S. military withdrawal from Iraq was
complete. It was a very expensive undertaking.

And then in March, the gradual Shiite insurgencies from Iran turned
into a true Iraqi civil war. In May, Iranian tanks crossed the border and
quickly took Baghdad. Although the exact number is not know, at least
230,000 Sunni Iraqis died as we stood by.

Iran also quickly moved into undefended Kuwait.

President Obama did exactly what he said he would. He sent Secretary
of State Maria Cantwell to Tehran to meet with Iranian President
Ahmadinejad.

After two weeks of high level talks, the United States agreed to
allow Iran to retain Iraq and Kuwait to create stability in the middle
east, with the understanding that Israel would not be disturbed.

Cantwell returned to Washington, and explained the agreement in her
famous speech, in which sh e proudly noted that the Obama administration
had finally achieved “peace in our time” in the Middl e East.

So there was some surprise at the rocket attacks on Tel Aviv on
August 14th.

President Obama said, “This is not the Mahmoud Ahmadinejad I knew.”

The Obama administration decided it would be de-stabilizing to take
sides in the conflict, and approximately 29,000 Israeli civilians died
during the summer and fall.

American Jews were appalled at the inaction. Yes, in 2010 most
American Jews were Democrats, but because of 2010, they are solid
Republicans today.

As awkward as it was, everything might have turned out all right for
the Obama administration going into the fall mid-term elections of 2010,
if it hadn’t been for the dirty bomb in the Port of Long Beach.

The administration had cut funding for the inspection of containers,
because they felt it showed a “lack of trust” in the international
trading community.

It wasn’t really a very big bomb, and thank goodness, not a real
nuclear device, but nonetheless it contaminated some expensive real
estate- Newport Beach, Palos Verdes Estates- and ultimately caused the
death of 14,000 Americans. People were especially annoyed that
Disneyland had to be closed for decontamination.

And so, in the midterm elections, Republicans regained control of
both the House and Senate, and the rest is history.

The impeachment proceedings against President Obama for “failure to
protect and defend” were swift and nearly unanimous. Vice President
Sibelius resigned. Newly-elected Speaker of the House, J.C. Watts, became
the 45th President of the United States.

But you know the rest of the story well.

Republicans finished the war on Islamic fundamentalists, largely by
aiming ICBM’s at Mecca and Medina.

No Democrat has been elected President since.

Republicans have held both Houses of Congress.

History of Western Civilization and Economics are now taught in all
public schools, and in English only.

Marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

And there are border fences, north and south.

We old codgers remember the ancient Confucian curse: “May you live in
interesting times.”

Well, 2010 was an interesting year, but it was not a good year to be
President.”

hee hee heeeeee…

Hell, George Carlin and Martina Navratalova could have whipped the US forces by themselves…

Lenny Bruce coulda done it single handedly!

Who knew poodle dancers were allergic to links.

boxie, do you think no one scrolls over if you post the whole freakin’ thing instead of a link?

Jesus WEPT!

I guess the poodle dancers need a long time to warm up for their main performances…

Nathan —

Heres the story about the Army and Marines accepting more felons —– must make you feel soooo proud and at home now that the marines / army would wave the felonies of sexual abusers Military Waivers for Ex-Convicts Increase

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/21/AR2008042103295_pf.html

By Ann Scott Tyson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, April 22, 2008; A01

The Army admitted about one-fourth more recruits last year with a record of legal problems ranging from felony convictions and serious misdemeanors to drug crimes and traffic offenses, as pressure to increase the size of U.S. ground forces led the military to grant more waivers for criminal conduct, according to new data released yesterday.

Such “conduct waivers” for Army recruits rose from 8,129 in fiscal 2006 to 10,258 in fiscal 2007. For Marine Corps recruits, they increased from 16,969 to 17,413.

Nathan you and I both know you could ask the Marines to retrain you to a specialty that is needed there —- and aren’t all Marines trained to be warriors first and mechanics / flyers etc are a secondary to their combat role so your claim to have volunteered to go back seems a little questionable as in LIAR !!!!!!!

Nathan

Several weeks ago your little man dad made what he said was a joke calling hillary and pelosi Bitches ‘—– and he taught you it was okay to call some one a bitch in the context of a joke — you are both so little —— and so so insignificant —- you both belong in Kansas

Besides, I’m not linking YOU to my email account, do you have manure for brains.

“Boxlock
Posted July 3, 2008 at 6:18 pm | Permalink
Besides, I’m not linking YOU to my email account, do you have manure for brains.”

Gee, what a thoughtful response. The point was
long cut and paste posts are obnoxious, and usually ignored.

ok, this is weird. Someone made an ID out of my name and posted some bizarre comment from me for whatever reason, I don’t know.

Care to explain?

“The point was long cut and paste posts are obnoxious, and usually ignored.”

As are those from nics like ‘libdave’

Please post a summary and link for gawd’s sake

Political_mama,

For wanting to see an end to the back and forth postings from Chas and I on Christianity, you don’t mind throwing in the mockery about Christianity yourself.

Jesus saves!

And with today’s high prices, that’s a real miracle.

OK Steven — Here is what I will say…. I will say that my comment re: OKOB was a bit over the edge… But, damn, I get sick and tired of having my profession demeaned day after day…. being called a Liar, because of disagreements of opinion… Being called OTHER Nics than my own… All of that CRAP… I guess with the crap I was getting out of OKOB the other day, I justs hit the old brick wall…. It was somewhat out of line…

But, I also hope that it doesnt happen AGAIN…. Now, there… that should solve the matter….

So… Nathan…. DROP IT!!

Chas,

Solve what?

No where did you apologize. You justified saying what you did and said it was “somewhat” over the line.

Either you apologize for saying it or you don’t.

And you didn’t.

I expected nothing less. It will truely surprise me to simply see you say, sorry.

Cosmos,

Will you ever apologize for all the lies and mischaracterizations you make about people posts and beliefs?

Chas,

How was that an apology?

The only thing you did was admit that what you said was somewhat over the line and over the edge. You didn’t apologize for saying it though.

You didn’t say you were wrong for saying it.

Everyday Chas, I will post and remind you of your words until you actually apologize.

Nathaniel,

What lies and mischaracterizations?

You did seem to believe the lies from the agricultural economist Dennis Avery.

And when you posted “all” people, that means “all” people, not a subgroup.

Mr. Chas, still waiting for your letter reporting Nathan the Marine as having posted something which would lead to misconduct charges under the UCMJ.

It has been quite a few months now.

Perhaps this was an untruthful post?

I was just remembering something that is relevant here.

I bet I wouldn’t have to look to far to find Nathan bragging about his Tshirt that says “Life is a bitch, Why vote for one?”

Hypocrite.

And boxy. My goodness I bet you had a wet dream awake while reading that screed.

Dream on.

“Maybe somethings should be off limits to joke about.”

Really? When have you ever respected anyone’s beliefs, HOG? When have you ever chosen the truth over your own lies, HOG? When have you ever dealt fairly with someone of a different political view than yours, HOG?

Let me help you with this, McLiar, you are an asshole.

Does that help?

Can you build it?

Yes we can!

Obama’s served only one term in the senate?

Change you can believe in!

Obama’s had no executive experience?

Change you can believe in!

Obama went to Chicago UCC for 20 years and didn’t hear what Pastor Jeremiah Wright said?

Change you can believe in!

Obama associated with a known domestic terrorist, William Ayres?

Change you can believe in!

Obama is the most liberal senator in congress and is pretending to be a moderate now?

Change you can believe in!

Obama associated with and was mentored by avowed communists.

Change you can believe in!

Obama didn’t pass any of his own legislation when in the Illinois Senate or the US Senate and often voted only present when he didn’t want to reveal what he really stood for.

Change you can believe in!

The best thing Obama has going for him is his speaking ability and his “Rock Star” appeal.

Change you can believe in!

Are tickets available to here him speak or to go to his concert?

Change you can believe in!

Father Phlegler spoke at his church at UCC.

Change you can believe in!

Obama is glad that gas prices are going up?

Change you can believe in!

What concrete plan has Obama presented for what he would do after being elected?

Change you can believe in!

What concrete plan has Obama presented for what he would do after being elected?

Change you can believe in!

What concrete plan has Obama presented for what he would do after being elected?

Change you can believe in!

What concrete plan has Obama presented for what he would do after being elected?

Change you can believe in!

And boxlicker posting wingnut emails, the equivalent of cyber chain mail, is just too funny. No wonder they cant be linked.

WHO TF would want to claim responsibility for them?

And the REALLY funny part? Boxy thinks they have value.

Hey boxlicker, I hear there is money waiting for you in Nigeria. I bet you get emails about that too.

Probably from the same spam artists.

hehehehheheheheeh!

Heheheheh Pmom and MonkeyHawk.

Reminds me of John Prine’s “Sam Stone”. Truely, the saddest song ever sung.

“there’s a hole in Daddy’s arm, where all the money goes. And Jesus Christ died for nothing I suppose”

Goes on after Sam commits suicide.

“but life had lost it’s fun. And there was nothing to be done, but trade his house that he bought on the GI bill. For a flag draped casket on a local hero’s hill”

“There’s a hole in Daddy’s arm, where all the money goes, and Jesus Christ died for nothing I suppose”.

Like I said, the saddest song ever sung.

Can you build?

Yes we can!

Obama’s served only one term in the senate?

Change you can believe in!

Obama’s had no executive experience?

Change you can believe in!

Obama went to Chicago UCC for 20 years and didn’t hear what Pastor Jeremiah Wright said?

Change you can believe in!

Obama associated with a known domestic terrorist, William Ayres?

Change you can believe in!

Obama is the most liberal senator in congress and is pretending to be a moderate now?

Change you can believe in!

Obama associated with and was mentored by avowed communists.

Change you can believe in!

Obama didn’t pass any of his own legislation when in the Illinois Senate or the US Senate and often voted only present when he didn’t want to reveal what he really stood for.

Change you can believe in!

The best thing Obama has going for him is his speaking ability and his “Rock Star” appeal.

Change you can believe in!

Are tickets available to here him speak or to go to his concert?

Change you can believe in!

Father Phlegler spoke at his church at UCC.

Change you can believe in!

Obama is glad that gas prices are going up?

Change you can believe in!

What concrete plan has Obama presented for what he would do after being elected?

Change you can believe in!

What concrete plan has Obama presented for what he would do after being elected?

Change you can believe in!

What concrete plan has Obama presented for what he would do after being elected?

Change you can believe in!

What concrete plan has Obama presented for what he would do after being elected?

Change you can believe in!

Also, notice how quickly Nathan’s new leaf has wilted and showed his true character. No surprise there. I have my theories as to why, but I won’t share them.

Boxlock posted July 3, 2008 at 8:46 pm

“cosmos,
Even more “ignorant people” can’t realize it is a joke and laugh.”
————–

Correct. Many people, like Hank and outlander on this blog, incorrectly believe that AGW is over and the Earth is cooling.

“Panther cooly replies “Iss noot mah dog”.”

Thanks, friend, I really needed that laugh. The moral high ground here is such a slippery slope. Thanks for being you and happy 4th!!!

Back at ya Steven! Wish you and yours were gonna be here for the annual fried chicken and potato salad extravaganza!

KFG,

Loved that Prine youtube. I have always felt real sad about the Sam Stone song – it is a beautiful piece of work and to hear him talk about the details of that creation was wonderful.

Wish I could be up there with you guys, but I am going to stay at home and buy no fireworks this year. Hope you have a good time.

So, Steven, just how much of Nathan’s back side am I supposed to kiss to placate the child??

Chas
Posted July 3, 2008 at 10:13 pm | Permalink
So, Steven, just how much of Nathan’s Arse am I supposed to kiss to placate the child??
*****
Sorry, Chas, your approach to the problem is not terribly helpful. My reply would be how much of his ass to you want to kiss, by being a jerk about not doing what you know is the decent/moral thing to do? Simple question. Why does it have to be so difficult?

Chas, I hope you know, I like you. Being a dumb jerk is not very becoming here – we all know you can do better.

Ummmm I MADE an apology… What more do you all want??

Chas…………… just ignore the sons of bitches…………………. they are not worth the effort and they are just dragging you down to their level.

Just promise them afterlife tequila.

WS I’m going to kick your butt. Go over to the Tiller thread. Bad MOVE for your man Obama.

Gawd, there she goes again, “hehehehheheheheeh”, the ksfarmgrrl. How obnoxious!
http://www.fotosearch.com/bigcomp.asp?path=BDX/BDX322/bxp58623.jpg

I don’t know what emails from Nigeria you are referring to, but apparently you get them to know so much. They must have the donkeys pinpointed.

“WS I’m going to kick your butt.”

I have no doubt that you are capable and even perhaps justified…………..

But I do think that the MSM is doing their best to paint Obama as taking a hard shift to the right. Personally, I do not believe that they are portraying a true picture of his positions…..

….. but I will reserve further comment until I read more.

I will, however, not support any rollback of a woman’s right to choose, nor will I support any erosion of the push for gay rights.

LOL I saw that video Steven… Hilarious!!

“How obnoxious!”

Not nearly as obnoxious as your continued existence on our fair planet, Box Head.

Please take a tequila shower as soon as possible.

“Exactly what level would Chas be sinking to when it is both you and he who continue to use the profanity and call people names?”

Well, (feces head), I am not a god damned minister, so I don’t have to worry about sinking to your phucking level – it makes no difference to me.

I can take the high road (I like it that way) and kick your lousy right wing, holier than thou conservative ass, or I can take the low road (been there, done that) and still kick your so-called Christian “I am better than you” conservative ass.

Take your pick, Price, I don’t give a good god damn.

another entire thread ruined.

WS Clark,

I pick the high road. It would be a first for you. It would be nice to see if you would actually do that.

“It would be nice to see if you would actually do that.”

Anytime Price, but I would bet that it would not take more that five posts before you would attack someone for their religious beliefs, their lifestyles or their (alleged lack of) reading comprehension.

Ah, you have turned over a new leaf – make that six posts.

what goes around comes around. karma. ;-)

WS Clark,

You think you can go longer than I can without being rude or vulgar or name calling?

Yes there are two paths you can go by
but in the long run
There’s still time to change the road you’re on

HI LINDA!!! :-*

I just went over to my iGoogle page to check the headlines. I have “Things to Ponder,” and it had these words:

Why do people who know the least know it the loudest?

Yep indeed, something to ponder, Linda!!

You have big plans for tomorrow??

I have NO plans. I don’t like things that go boom. My daughter and I have been planning a trip to the lake for early August. We found a resort with a four bedroom house available. Two queen sized beds in three of the bedrooms and four twin beds in the fourth. So, we’re gonna have some family togetherness!

Did I ever tell you that my daughters breed well in captivity? I have a bunch of grandkids. ;-)

My son from Boston is coming home and a lady friend of his who now works in San Diego will join us. Keep your fingers crossed on this one! He (my son) is such a nerd! She, the lady scientist now in San Diego, is so wonderful! She is Canadian, earned her PhD at Harvard… I wish for him more than his work! She is much more than his work! lol

lindainks55
Posted July 3, 2008 at 11:37 pm | Permalink
Yes there are two paths you can go by
but in the long run
There’s still time to change the road you’re on
*****
So true. But in truth, there are more than two paths… This time, really, night all.

Sent you an email Linda. Important stuff in terms of tearing down the walls and jumping over those barriers with our Mausers. Max will have a wet dream about that, but it will not be important. Night.

LOL Cosmos… That they will!!

WS Clark,

Your posts will be no different than the very first time we ever posted towards one another.

You were nothing but a rude and vulgar person and then and I never expected much more from you since.

“You were nothing but a rude and vulgar person and then and I never expected much more from you since.”

Thank you, Price, please take a tequila shower soon.

Whoops! You ain’t worth good tequila – better drop down to Jose Cuervo for you, since you are such a lying hypocritical so-called Christian do gooder.

You want rude and vulgar?

Phuck you and the dog your Daddy mated with to produce a son of a bitch like you.

“Would you act like that at the BBQ if I were to have come over?”

Yes.

WS Clark,

So when you have no problem saying the garbage you do about my family and I, why do you act upset when anyone says crap about you and your family?

Ahem: While you people are arguing about personalities, I posted this on another dumb thread:
*************************************

Thanks, Linda.

If I seem very frustrated it’s because the prevailing assumption among the stupid and politicos (I repeat myself) is that, even if this new type of surveillance violates the prohibition against “general warrants” that gave us the Fourth Amendment in the first place, surely the increased security of such measures makes them inevitable.

Yeah, yeah, I know all the arguments of the difficulty of tracing IP addresses to exact locations. It’s mostly crap (in the Western world, it’s a non-issue), but it’s idiotic to presume that dragnet sweeps of international communications from United States will help, in any way.

In fact, many experts agree with what I concluded at the outset: the more data, the more complexity, the false positives—and false negatives. It’s a lazy-and-stupid person’s method for fighting terrorism. And I don’t care if the method is data mining, pattern mining or whatnot. “Garbage in, garbage out” still applies.

http://www.techworld.com/storage/features/index.cfm?featureid=2770
http://www.schneier.com/essay-108.htmles.com/p/articles/mi_m1568/is_6_35/ai_109085440/pg_7
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/18/AR2006061800524.html

Discussion? Maybe? Liberals: McCain is–of course–a bit worse on this one. That doesn;t make Obama’s intellectually vapid concession acceptable. All the more so because he isn’t intellectually vapid (I guess he’s in training or something).

It’s kinda campy. But I LOVE the musical 1776.

I find myself identifying with John Adams. He was obnoxious and disliked too. By those who would hold back. By the provincial and the staid and and the moneyed.

I’d be watching it now if I could find it.

I love this song.

“Adams:
Is anybody there?
Does anybody care?
Does anybody see what I see?

They want to me to quit; they say
John, give up the fight
Still to England I say
Good night, forever, good night!
For I have crossed the Rubicon
Let the bridge be burned behind me
Come what may, come what may

Commitment!

The croakers all say we’ll rue the day
There’ll be hell to pay in fiery purgatory
Through all the gloom, through all the gloom
I see the rays of ravishing light and glory!

Is anybody there? Does anybody care?
Does anybody see what I see?

I see fireworks! I see the pagaent and
Pomp and parade
I hear the bells ringing out
I hear the cannons roar
I see Americans – all Americans
Free forever more

How quiet, how quiet the chamber is
How silent, how silent the chamber is

Is anybody there? Does anybody care?
Does anybody see what I see?

Nathaniel. . .

So you have no answers to my questions?

http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/07/open-thread-73/#comment-377951

Great lyrics, Jay… terific!!

* teriffic * even

WS Clark,

How many blog meetings have you been to?

I have been to about 5.

At everyone of them I was nothing less than nice and polite to everyone.

I loved KFG’s chicken and even was given some to take home. Her salad is to die for.

You know nothing about me. You think that because we argue on an internet blog you know me?

Obviously not.

WS Clark,

I have never insulted your granddaughter to my knwoledge, so if you know something in particular you will have to remind me.

I take back what I said about your son and son-in-law as well.

I should never have said those things.

“How many blog meetings have you been to?”

Zero – ask me ten years from now and the answer will be the same.

“You know nothing about me.”

I know way too much about you. You are a lying, two faced, holier than thou, self righteous, self proclaimed Christian that claims to be able to stand in judgment of everyone else.

“You think that because we argue on an internet blog you know me?”

I thank God every day that I do NOT know you. More importantly, I also thank God that my Grandchildren do not have ANY exposure to you in any way.

And…………….

“Is Clark the liar whining again?”

Eh, the admitted liar McCluer shows up! Well, McCluer, married and divorced or never married, McLiar? Do you have children, JM, or are you still a virgin?

Eh?

Conservatives are such LIARS…………

and Clark the liar, keeps whining and whining and whining and whining and whining and whining…

For Price and McLiar, Jesus would have been looking for a really good bottle of tequila.

Clark the liar thinks he funny screwing up an old Irish joke about urinating over a grave.

Clark the liar has no sense of timing or distribution of mental faculties.

(chortles)

How many people want to see you again Nathan?

How many people who have not met you want to?

WS Clark,

If what you post is at least 10 times worse than anything I post here and is done so 10 times more than I post here, how do they respond to what you post here?

They would have to be sick for weeks after reading what you post if what I post makes them throw up.

“Clark the liar has no sense of timing”

McCluer the ADMITTED liar can’t seem to understand that his past history of lying makes him a HUGE hypocrite when he accusing anyone else of lying.

But then, his IQ is barely above that of a turnip.

Will this be “awaiting moderation”?

Folks–those of you I’ve met in RL, and those I haven’t. . . .

Do you live for this stuff, or what?

Whatever. If it trips your trigger, it’s cool.

Only difference from my previous post: “stuff” was a different word.

Damn I wish I could find “1776″

It is SO illustrative of how liberals had to compromise with conservatives to get this country born.

That compromise only forestalled a civil war between the parties.

We see the same to this day.

WS Clark,

Do your grandkids adore your vulgar language and the way you act on this blog towards others too?

“Do your grandkids adore your vulgar language and the way you act on this blog towards others too?”

Yes, they expect that their grandfather will fight for them and the future of this country and they absolutely adore me.

There is nothing you or that flaming hypocrite McLiar could possibly say that would change that.

Did I mention that my family thinks that you and your buddy McLiar suck?

And really bad, too?

Rage,

And how do we know that what people like Nathaniel post here isn’t RL?
—————

Would Jesus have been able to kill people from a long distance, as well as Nathaniel brags that he can?

Nathaniel posted June 29, 2008 at 2:23 am
http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-628-2/#comment-375611

“I am quite capable of hitting a person at 600 yards with open sights.

Give me a scope and 7.62 rifle and we are talking 1000 yards.

If I can ever afford a Barrett .50 caliber rilfe I could hit someone at much, much, much further distances.”
————–

Hopefully, Nathaniel will not be able to “afford a Barrett .50 caliber rilfe”.

“Yeah, Clark the liar just created another whopper.”

How is your “son” doing, McLiar?

By the way, how can you have a “son” if you are still a virgin?

Eh?

Can’t answer, can you, McLiar?

We’ll leave Clark the liar crying in his beer and having his midnight multiple whopper and extra large fries snack.

Clark the liar sings:

I’m a boo-hooing about you.
You make me so blue,
I wish you go away because
I can’t make it through another liberal day
without boo-hooing about you.
waaaahhh haaaaahhhwaaaaahh

Damn I wish I could find “1776?

I hear you, Jay. Anyone who thinks the Internet makes books unnecessary is a misguided fool.

Maybe it’s out there somewhere, but I remember Madison’s letter to Jefferson, rough paraphrasing: “the Quakers presented several petitions for abolishing slavery and, although they were not thrown under the table, they were treated with as much contempt as if they were.”

The Quakers were right–but the fix was in. Too much money was involvewd. And the stakes were a hell of a lot higher than now–the cohension of a rebellious collection of British colonies, as opposed to maintaining the corporate comfort of our moneyed masters.

WS Clark,

What an example you set here. You post nothing but vulgarity and then use your grandkids to support doing so.

Wow.

I think you have done far more to destroy any credibility you had here all by yourself tonight.

God Bless you and your family.

Good night.

BlueJay,

I must have missed where I was fighting dirty.

Good night.

The “Revolution” was a damned sham Rage.

It was compromise emobodied in cronyism.

I’m glad it happened. Many members of my long gone family even helped it happen.

Maybe it needs to happen again.

Nathaniel
Posted July 4, 2008 at 1:12 am | Permalink
WS Clark,

Do your grandkids adore your vulgar language and the way you act on this blog towards others too?

=======================================

Nathan
Posted December 25, 2007 at 6:19 pm | Permalink
JR,

I am not “speculating” on your motives.

I am commenting on your actions here, which ring of utter insincerity.

The “poster” which you have been talking about and continue to do so has a name. Not using the name doesn’t change the fact that you are indeed talking about him.

You have yet to add one substantive thing to this conversation other than trying to demean me or my father.

Shouldn’t you be looking at all your underage teenage girls websites getting your jollies right about now?
========================================

Uh huh… I remember this post!! Didnt want to ever post it again… BUT —- It might put a few things into perspective >>>

Sorry for any firestorm

I have a gun Nathan.

And I know where to get more.

The Quakers have zero in common with either Democrats or modern day liberals.

The liberals of the Jeffersonian period were all slave holders. Quakers were against slavery.

Uhm, okay. I’ll talk to my slaves and get back to you.

Madison and Jefferson both expressed qualms about the slave trade (see,e.g. Jefferson’s original draft of the Declaration of Independence), but it was to their everlasting shame that they did not come close to practicing what they preached. But the genius of the American Revolution was not that these men were angels, but rather that they crafted principles that in the long run could not be blindly limited to the privileged class for which they were originally created.

As I recall, the radicals-indeed the “Nader” people of the the 19th century–the abolitionists–were opposed to slavery. And by the way, the first Republican president–Abraham Lincoln–paved the way not only for its abolition, but the horrific concept of “equal protection” that liberals keep harping about.

And your vapid attempt to parse to 200 years of history in FoxNews terms doesn’t hold water.

Fast forward to the 50s/1960s–a long time between drinks, but can anyone deny that “modern liberals”–of both parties–heralded in the new era of civll rights? Or we engaged in same silly game of the 80s, where “liberal” is gratuitously redefined in whatever terms the conservative propagandists say it should be?

A minor knowledge of history is pointless when one’s political spin overrides it.

Damn I may have to go buy the video.

This is for WS, Chas, Rage, Farmgrrl and so many of my rebellious friends.

“Congress:
Sit down, John! Sit down, John!
For God’s sake, John, sit down!
Sit down, John! Sit down, John!
For God’s sake, John, sit down!

Someone oughta open up a window!

It’s ninety degrees! Have mercy, John, please
It’s hot as hell in Philadephia!

Someone oughta open up a window!

Adams:
I say vote yes! Vote yes! Vote for independency!

Congress:
Someone oughta open up a window!

Adams:
I say vote yes!

Congress:
Sit down, John!

Adams:
Vote for independency!

Congress:
Someone oughta open up a window!
No, no, no! Too many flies! Too many flies!
But it’s hot as hell in Philadelphia!
Someone oughta open up a window!
Can’t we compromise here?

Adams:
Vote yes!

Congress:
No, too many flies here!

Adams:
Vote yes!

Congress:
Oh for God’s sake, John, sit down!

Adams:
Oh, good God! Consider yourself lucky that you have John Adams to abuse,
for no sane man would tolerate it!

Congress:
John, you’re a bore; we’ve heard this before
Now for God’s sake, John, sit down!

Adams:
I say vote yes!

Congress:
No!

Adams:
Vote yes!

Congress:
No!

Adams:
Vote for independency!

Congress:
Someone oughta open up a window!

Adams:
I say vote yes!

Congress:
Sit down, John!

Congress:
Vote for independency!

Congress:
Will someone shut that man up?

Adams:
Never!

America is all about rebellion and innovation. We seem to have forgotten that lately.

I haven’t.

Tomorow night I will be shooting fireworks deemed illegal where I live.

Nathaniel Price,

Still no answers to my questions?

http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/07/open-thread-73/#comment-377951

And how do we know that what people like Nathaniel post here isn’t RL?

Okay, point taken. I remember some considerable unease before Meetup #2 when Nathan posted, on this very blog, that he would be packing heat.

Didn’t happen (though he claimed afterwards, if I recall correctly, that he had a gun in the car).

People are weird. They aren’t often casually homicidal.

Hee hee hee. And maybe some of my blog buddies could do the chicken dance? hee hee hee heeeeeee…..