Swift-boat battle rages on

kerryFour years later, the battle over the specious Swift-boat campaign ads rages on. Last week, a group of veterans who served with Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., sent a 12-page letter with a 42-page attachment of military records to T. Boone Pickens, the Texas oilman who helped finance the 2004 ads attacking Kerry’s Vietnam War record. Pickens pledged last November that he would give $1 million to anyone who could disprove a single charge the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth made against Kerry. The Kerry group rebuts several of the accusations and demands apologies.

332 Comments

  1. Regular
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 6:11 am | Permalink

    Kerry was ‘agin’ his Vietnam service before he was ‘fer’ it again in 2004.

    (chortles)

  2. Mary_Caruso
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 6:14 am | Permalink

    Don’t hold your breath waiting for him to pay up….some people just prefer to make their own reality. It’s called “rewriting history” in the psych biz.

  3. Posted June 25, 2008 at 6:16 am | Permalink

    Let’s hope Pickens has that much in the bank, so he can pay up! I have been waiting 4 years to see somebody tell those swift boaters where to stick it with their lies.

    Pickens really built himself a big strawman with those ads. Now, it looks like some folks are going to tear it down for him.

  4. Monkeyhawk
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 6:29 am | Permalink

    Just a million bucks?!

    Heck, Pickens pays more than that for a wide-receiver to play at Oklahoma State.

  5. Mary_Caruso
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 6:38 am | Permalink

    I think Kerry should sue his ass for defamation of character.

  6. HLP
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 6:47 am | Permalink

    LOL!!

    Kerry lost. He ain’t running again. Get over it!

  7. darkanonm
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 6:48 am | Permalink

    Kerry would have to prove he defamed him, and that would be hard to prove, especially with Kerry.

  8. Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:09 am | Permalink

    Of course, we could get them back by using this story…maybe then they’d figure out how harmful the swiftboat veterans were and how low they were for buying into that crap.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7459946.stm

    Thing is, I still beleive McCain. I can admit that, can the freaks that supported the lies of the Swiftboats admit that they were wrong too? naw prolly not. POS’s.

  9. Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:12 am | Permalink

    That figures you’d laugh about it Hank. Any means to an end? And where we’d be today had we elected Kerry would be far better off than we are now. Congratulations.

    I hope your son gets beaten up for his service as much as Kerry did. And yes, I hope the others and Kerry sue for defamation, and take every last dime that man has.

  10. HLP
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:28 am | Permalink

    LOL!!

    Well P_Mom, your wish has come true! Some of the chickenshit liberals on this BLOG have already ‘beaten up my son’ for his service!

    Kerry lied about his service. He still hasn’t released his medical records. Think about it dear, three ‘band-aid purple hearts and you can’t name one of his wounds! Not one scar!

    On second thought, P_Mom, hoping my son gets “. . . beaten up for his service . . .” is pretty chickenshit of you too!

  11. KansasNative
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:48 am | Permalink

    Waaaah!

    I thought Marines were tough.

    No wonder the Marines prefer excons and high school dropouts.

  12. HLP
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:53 am | Permalink

    See P-Mom,

    KN makes my point! He’s one of yours!

    LOL!

  13. outlander
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 8:16 am | Permalink

    Unbelievable Hank. I guess some folks have so much hate in their soul it just comes flowing out for the rest of us shake our heads at. Common decency apparently means nothing.

  14. lindainks55
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 8:19 am | Permalink

    So Hank gets to decide which person’s service should be honored? And then outlander gets to decide which folks are hateful and possess common decency?

    That’s some weird thinking there!

  15. outlander
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 8:24 am | Permalink

    Some folks Linda, also have a problem with being able to discuss issues and politics without making it personal. It is a sign of lack of self control and intelligence. See above.

  16. StevenEDavis
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 8:28 am | Permalink

    Calling people “chickenshits” so early in the a.m. is interesting, too. Must be a Price speaking…

  17. lindainks55
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 8:28 am | Permalink

    Its OK for you to make things personal, but not others. Oh, I see. giggle

    What is it the blind see?

  18. lindainks55
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 8:32 am | Permalink

    “Pickens pledged last November that he would give $1 million to anyone who could disprove a single charge the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth made against Kerry.”
    ———–

    This money will never be paid. The goal has already been bought.

    Besides, it’s OK for some to slander. Not OK for others. Hank and outlander and Pickens and… get to decide who is leading by example.

  19. HLP
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 8:58 am | Permalink

    So, Linda,

    Do you support P_Mom, KN an others that bring my boy’s service into the discussion and defame him based on absolutly no facts at all?

  20. BlueJay
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:17 am | Permalink

    When you engage in the trashing of veterans…

    you invite and even encourage the trashing of veterans.

    This is a case of judging cons by their own standards.

    Of course, they don’t have any.

    Listen to them wail when the sword cuts both ways.

  21. lindainks55
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:34 am | Permalink

    Hank, I thought we were signing up for blog duties and I planned to be the secretary, keep today’s minutes. I was recording those who were volunteering for duties. I had you at deciding whose service should be honored. Did you not volunteer for that duty today? The minutes can be amended.

  22. HLP
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:37 am | Permalink

    Good morning BlueJay!

    Let’s use the same standards, OK?

    Kerry.

    Politician, used his service in Viet Nam as the center piece of his campaign for president.

    Nathan.

    College student, has never used his service record for personal gain.

    Kerry.

    Lied before congress about events in VIet Nam.

    Nathan.

    Has never lied about his service in Iraq.

    Kerry.

    Through his medals and ribbons away.

    Nathan.

    Still wears his proudly while serving in the Marine Corp Reserves.

    Kerry.

    Lied about his shipmates under oath as to unproven alledged atrocities.

    Nathan.

    Has never lied about his service.

    Kerry.

    Staged and filmed phoney events for future political use while in Viet Nam.

    Nathan.

    Made a DVD for his Battallion documenting their tour in Iraq.

    Need I go on? If you want to use the same standards, the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth served with Kerry. By the same standard, maybe you should serve with Nathan when he goes back before you defame him and his service.

  23. ksagnostic
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:39 am | Permalink

    Hank, the bullsh*t from the so-called Swift Boat Veterans for Truth were laid to rest during the campaign. Unfortunately, it was not the mainstream so called liberal media that did their jobs and actually investigated the truth of the allegations.

    http://www.factcheck.org/republican-funded_group_attacks_kerrys_war_record.html

    The men who actually, physically served with Kerry did not make the allegations. The men who actually, physically served with Kerry in fact disputed the allegations, and so do Navy records.

    The so-called Swift Boat Veterans for Truth played on the great distaste that quite a few VN veterans felt for Kerry, but that doesn’t make the allegations true. Your buying into them, as well as your already admitted reliance on media that exists primarily to reinforce the viewpoints of coalition conservatives rather than to simply report news, demonstrates that you simply believe those claims that match your prior beliefs.

    With regards to your son, I myself have no reason whatsoever to believe he served anything less than honorably. I think some of the others here are over the top. Others are trying to point out that the sort of innuendo used against Kerry can be used against anyone who served. I don’t think the “lesson” is necessary nor appropriate myself.

  24. Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:39 am | Permalink

    “a group of veterans who served with Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., sent a 12-page letter with a 42-page attachment of military records to T. Boone Pickens,”

    As I recall, none of the so-called swift-boaters had actually served with Kerry. So here we have true veteran eye-witnesses rebutting their bogus claims.

  25. BlueJay
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:42 am | Permalink

    “I had you at deciding whose service should be honored. Did you not volunteer for that duty today?”

    I don’t know about today linda.

    But Mr Price is on record here and PROUDLY so of having contributed his voice AND money to the attacks on John Kerry’s service.

    He has moved and seconded the trashing of veterans for political reasons. Now he must live with the standards he helped build.

  26. ksagnostic
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:43 am | Permalink

    “Kerry.

    “Lied before congress about events in VIet Nam.”

    “Kerry.

    “Lied about his shipmates under oath as to unproven alledged atrocities.”

    Of course, you assume the premise of everything you say has been documented.

    http://www.factcheck.org/swift_boat_veterans_anti-kerry_ad_he_betrayed.html

    There is no question that many veterans were personally hurt by Kerry’s testimony, and feel that their own service was tarnished by what he said. However, none of that demonstrates that Kerry willfully lied before Congress.

  27. BlueJay
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:48 am | Permalink

    “By the same standard, maybe you should serve with Nathan when he goes back before you defame him and his service.”

    I have not defamed ANYONE’S service. That is the difference between you and me and just the beginning of them.

    What, I’m supposed to be impressed that he is going back? Sorry. He’s walking his talk is all I’ll give him. I have no more interest in his and your war than that.

  28. Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:51 am | Permalink

    Kerry’s statements about Nam were totally consistent with what was told to me personally by other veterans about Nam.

  29. gster
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:51 am | Permalink

    I am certainly not an expert regarding this matter, nor do I presume to be. I have found it curious that the Swift Boaters supposedly “know” more about this situation than the Dept. of the Navy.

    That’s a lot of knowing!

  30. Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:54 am | Permalink

    “the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth served with Kerry.”

    Did they? Not according to all those others who were physically there with Kerry.

  31. lindainks55
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:56 am | Permalink

    gster, the minutes reflect “voice of reason” filled by several and seems to be well covered. Could you take jester? ;-)

  32. gster
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:58 am | Permalink

    Linda- OK, but I have to warn you I see far more than I understand.

  33. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:11 am | Permalink

    John Kerry altered his own records, under the Jimmy Carter Amnesty Program.
    Navy Secretary William Claytor was involved in John Kerry’s “final” discharge.
    Kerry served under LBJ, then Nixon.
    (Remember that Kerry lied and said that Nixon sent him to Cambodia over Christmas? Kerry later retracted that lie, since LBJ was still President and Nixon had not been sworn in yet, on the date that Kerry lied about. Truth is, Kerry was NEVER in Cambodia, but more on that later.)
    Anyway, we have Kerry serving under LBJ and then Nixon.
    Then Gerald Ford is President.
    Then Jimmy Carter is elected President.
    And, we are to think that Navy Secretary Claytor, who only held that position under Carter, “discharged” anti war activist Kerry?

    No, Kerry first received a Less than Honorable Discharge.

    Kerry had his discharge upgraded by the Carter Amnesty program.

    Kerry should have run as an anti-war activist.

    Instead, Kerry ran as a “war hero” — and that is why Kerry lost.

    By the way, Kerry, himself, posted the William Claytor letter on his web page, for a brief period, obviously this was done by a staff member that did not understand what that letter meant.

    Also, the DD-214 that Kerry listed on his web page lists a “Silver Star with a Combat V” as one of Kerry’s medals.

    No such medal exists.

    The “combat V” is never awarded with the Silver Star.

    Chances are great that this error, in Kerry’s records, was caused by the fact that the military clerks had to retype all of Kerry’s old records, long after the war was over, and long after combat had ended in Vietnam.

    The Military clerks who did the discharge paperwork would not have the experience, during the Carter Administration, to know that they had indicated an award that did not exist.

    In other words, we can find many questions, and many errors, in Kerry’s own accounts of Vietnam and his radical anti-Vietnam past.

  34. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:20 am | Permalink

    Well, I knew that the Kerry-obsessed Rossell would show up here, so let me take this opportunity to give you a sincere phuck you for your comments about me on the Dobson thread…………….

    Please take the sick horse that you rode in on and ride on our of here.

    You may not like my opinions, Rossell, and I know you wouldn’t like me if we were to meet, but a liar I am not……………………..

  35. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:24 am | Permalink

    Prove me wrong, WS, —

    Does Kerry’s DD-214 list a “Silver Star with a Combat V” — a medal that does not exist?

    http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/jodhn.htm

  36. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:26 am | Permalink

    WS
    Prove me wrong, if you can, ok?

    Did Kerry claim to spend Christmas in Cambodia, under orders of President Nixon, at a time when LBJ was still President? (Scroll down on this one, it lists several of Kerry’s lies, so you have to hunt for Kerry’s lie about Cambodia):

    http://www.militarycorruption.com/kerry3.htm

  37. Regular
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:29 am | Permalink

    One can only hope that one of these libs or several get caught overseas in a situation by terrorist and held captive.

    Their only hope to escape are the United States Marines.

    In a news conference, one reporter will ask the four star Marine general how they are going to get the hostages released.

    The General reply, “We’re not going to rescue them, the libs didn’t support us, called us baby killers, so fack em, let them die.” The General smiles and walks away sharply.

  38. HLP
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:31 am | Permalink

    gster,

    If you’re really curious I recommend you read Kerry biogaphy (the latest one that has been revised to reflect corrections pointed out by the SVFT) and then read the book by the SVFT.

  39. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:31 am | Permalink

    “CHRISTMAS IN CAMBODIA” – YET ANOTHER “LIE”

    Has John Kerry been caught in yet another blatant lie about his military service? From the frantic gyrations of his spin-doctors and their specious explanations of “what really happened,” it would seem the senator’s “Christmas in Cambodia” story is in reality a fable, dreamed up to embellish the already fraudulent candidate’s resumé.

    We read in the Congressional Record of March 27, 1986 (S3594) the following from the Massachusetts senator:

    “Mr. President, I remember Christmas of 1968, sitting on a gunboat in [our italics] Cambodia. I remember what it was like to be shot at by the Vietnamese, Khmer Rouge and Cambodians, and I heard the President of the United States [Richard Nixon] telling the American people I was not there, that our troops were not in Cambodia.

    I have that memory which is seared into my brain, that says to me, before we send another generation into harm’s way, we have a responsibility in the United States Senate to go the last step, to make the best effort possible in order to avoid that kind of conflict.”

    First of all, on December 25, 1968, Lyndon Johnson was still President of the United States and would continue to be chief executive until Nixon was sworn into office on January 20, 1969.

    Next, Kerry could not have been “in” Cambodia at that stage of the war. Even his two adoring crewmates – Michael Medeiros and James Wassel have disputed that claim. And being on Kerry’s boat, they should know.

    In December 1968, no U.S. Navy patrol craft would be ordered or authorized to penetrate Cambodian waters. It just did not happen.

    And the line about being fired at by the “Khmer Rouge,” that was the Cambodian Communists, led by Khieu Samphan. Unfortunately for Kerry, that fighting force wasn’t even formed yet when “war hero” Kerry had his pipe dream. The Khmer Rouge came about after the American CIA engineered the overthrow of Prince Sihanouk in 1970.”

  40. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    “Prove me wrong, if you can, ok?”

    The comment was in reference to your statement that I was lying regarding Dobson.

    So, I’ll say it again – sincerely phuck you, Rossell.

  41. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:33 am | Permalink

    So, WS admits that I am telling the truth, about Kerry and Kerry’s lies? Ok, I can accept that.

  42. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:34 am | Permalink

    Why was Carter Navy Secretary Claytor involved in John Kerry’s military discharge, in any way shape or form?

    http://www.nationalreview.com/kerry/kerry200410130912.asp

  43. lindainks55
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:35 am | Permalink

    Regular, in a tit for tat to your caring post:

    When the federally-funded ESC research discovers treatments and cures for what ails us, EVERYONE will benefit no matter their political persuasions.

    We are ONE country of diverse peoples.

    Back on this thread’s topic: We’ve proven among us that whatever you want to find can be found, whichever “side” of an issue you want to support there will be something in support. Then we each weigh ALL the evidence and we form our opinions and our truths.

  44. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:36 am | Permalink

    “According to the secretary of the Navy’s document, the “authority of reference” this board was using in considering Mr. Kerry’s record was “Title 10, U.S. Code Section 1162 and 1163. “This section refers to the grounds for involuntary separation from the service. What was being reviewed, then, was Mr. Kerry’s involuntary separation from the service. And it couldn’t have been an honorable discharge, or there would have been no point in any review at all. The review was likely held to improve Mr. Kerry’s status of discharge from a less than honorable discharge to an honorable discharge.

    A Kerry campaign spokesman, David Wade, was asked whether Mr. Kerry had ever been a victim of an attempt to deny him an honorable discharge. There has been no response to that inquiry.”

  45. Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:37 am | Permalink

    Khmer Rouge pre-dates 1968:

    “The history of the communist movement in Cambodia can be divided into six phases: the emergence of the Indochinese Communist Party (ICP), whose members were almost exclusively Vietnamese, before World War II; the ten-year struggle for independence from the French, when a separate Cambodian communist party, the Kampuchean (or Khmer) People’s Revolutionary Party (KPRP), was established under Vietnamese auspices; the period following the Second Party Congress of the KPRP in 1960, when Saloth Sar (Pol Pot after 1976) and other future Khmer Rouge leaders gained control of its apparatus; the revolutionary struggle from the initiation of the Khmer Rouge insurgency in 1967-68 to the fall of the Lon Nol government in April 1975; the Democratic Kampuchea regime, from April 1975 to January 1979; and the period following the Third Party Congress of the KPRP in January 1979, when Hanoi effectively assumed control over Cambodia’s government and communist party.”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khmer_Rouge

    Paul – I had friends who told me they were shot at when they were in Cambodia. However, I will acknowledge that they were not sure who was shooting at them.

  46. HLP
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:42 am | Permalink

    Did I donate to the SBVT? Yep.

    I would like to think that in some small way I contributed to Lurch’s defeat! (and BlueJay is correct! I’m proud of it!)

  47. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:43 am | Permalink

    “So, WS admits that I am telling the truth”

    You are truly an idiot, Rossell. I have not commented on the subject matter of this thread.

    My only statement was in reference to your comment that I was lying re: Dobson.

    Nathan would be very unhappy with your reading comprehension, Rossell.

  48. Regular
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:43 am | Permalink

    #
    lindainks55
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:35 am | Permalink

    Regular, in a tit for tat to your caring post:

    When the federally-funded ESC research discovers treatments and cures for what ails us, EVERYONE will benefit no matter their political persuasions.

    We are ONE country of diverse peoples.

    Back on this thread’s topic: We’ve proven among us that whatever you want to find can be found, whichever “side” of an issue you want to support there will be something in support. Then we each weigh ALL the evidence and we form our opinions and our truths.
    ———————————
    So in short, you just made a weasel statement that Libs should never apologize for what they say about the military who put their lives on the line to defend the country.

    What do I say? “Fack the Libs, let them die.”

  49. HLP
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:43 am | Permalink

    And, if the ‘South Chicago Homeys for Truth’ start a 527 organiztion I’ll donate to them too!

  50. HLP
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:49 am | Permalink

    Speaking about South Chicago, what exactly does a ‘neighborhood organizer’ do? Who pays for that? How do you support your family organizing neighborhoods?

    Just wondering.

    Where’s the SCHT when you need them?

  51. Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    Where’s the SCHT when you need them?

    They are hoping the White Sox can win the AL. We ‘north-siders’ are going with our Cubbies.

  52. Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:57 am | Permalink

    Hypocrite Hank asks, “Do you support P_Mom, KN an others that bring my boy’s service into the discussion and defame him based on absolutly no facts at all?”

    That’s what the Swiftboat Liars did to Kerry, and Hank supported them with money.

    If you don’t like it done to you, you can start by not doing it yourself.

    Seems to me that someone said something similar . . . where was that?

    Now I remember, “do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”

    Unfortunately for you, Hank, you’re learning that other message of the Bible, “for in as much as a man sows, so shall he reap . . . “

  53. Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:59 am | Permalink

    As for T. Boone Pickens, he’ll never pay up.

    He’s a lying pr*ck b@st@rd.

    And he’s from TEXAS, the most arrogant state in the Union with absolutely no justification for it.

    What can one expect.

  54. HLP
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:00 am | Permalink

    Oh really Capn.?

    So you support KN and P_Mom? Must really suck to be a liberal!

  55. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:02 am | Permalink

    Capn
    John Kerry is a proven liar.
    However,
    The Swift Boat Veterans have yet to be proven wrong.

  56. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:03 am | Permalink

    “We ‘north-siders’ are going with our Cubbies.”

    Once every one hundred years – better hope they win this year, Ben, you may not be around in a hundred years for the next go around!

  57. Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:05 am | Permalink

    Regular–

    You might look at the record of the military rescuing hostages.

    It’s none too good.

    Ask that Burnham woman.

  58. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:08 am | Permalink

    Shouldn’t you see a doctor, Rossell, about your perpetual hard on for John Kerry?

    They say you should see a doctor if priaprism lasts more than four yours.

    Your case has lasted four YEARS.

  59. Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:08 am | Permalink

    We spend more money on our military than all the militaries in the world put together, and we can’t get two missionaries of an island in The Philippines.

    Hey, if Halliburton and Blackwater don’t make money, it’s not “important.”

  60. ksagnostic
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:09 am | Permalink

    “The Swift Boat Veterans have yet to be proven wrong.”

    One line paragraph man strikes again.

    The Swift Boat Veterans have yet to be proven right.

    http://www.snopes.com/politics/kerry/service.asp

    http://www.snopes.com/politics/kerry/swift.asp

    As for why the V is with his Silver Star, I don’t claim to know the reason for that, but that doesn’t invalidate Kerry’s Silver Star.

  61. Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:09 am | Permalink

    Proving negatives in an interesting quandry. What happens when a shadowy 527 group HHVT comes out with all sorts of vclaims against McCain? Could they be disproven? Remember; the burden of proof is not on the accuser to prove the allegations. It is upon the accused to prove his innocence.

  62. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:09 am | Permalink

    Kerry’s entire “Winter Soldier” campaign was a lie!

    Kerry had people “testify” about “war crimes” — people who had never been in combat, and at least one person who had NEVER been to Vietnam:

    http://www.wintersoldier.com/index.php?topic=Historians

  63. HLP
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:11 am | Permalink

    “We ‘north-siders’ are going with our Cubbies.”

    Good luck with that, Ben!

  64. kansasdem
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:13 am | Permalink

    Grandpa McCain has 700 pages in his BuPers file. Bet we can find lots of disciplinary reports, reprimands and incidents of incompentence and dereliction of duty in there. The Old Fart got into the Naval Academy because his daddy and his grandpa were admirals, then he finished last in his class. Oh yeah. Lots of good things in his file that would speak to his character and temperment. Can’t wait to see it. Either he’ll release it, or it’ll get leaked.

  65. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:14 am | Permalink

    “THAT is the crux of my problem with John Kerry’s dissent. For the most part it was based on fraud. His dissent was NOT based in truth. His dissent was not conducted responsibly. It was, in my opinion, based on mischaracterization, outright lies, and fraud.

    [Much of what I’m going to quote here comes from an excellent book that I urge all to read concerning this specifically and Viet Nam and its veterans in general. The book is “Stolen Valor” by B.G. Burkett. I’ll append “[BG]” after those quotes so excerpted.]

    Neil Sheehan, certainly not a proponent of the war in Viet Nam by any stretch, characterized what was going on at that time quite well. Sheehan destroyed the credibility of Mark Lane’s book “Conversations with Americans” by revealing most of the “veterans” who’s “atrocities” Lane quoted hadn’t been in combat or even in Vietnam in many cases :

    ”This kind of reasoning,” Sheehan wrote, “amounts to a new McCarthyism, this time from the left. Any accusation, any innuendo, any rumor, is repeated and published as truth.”[BG}
    It was, however, Lane’s book which inspired the “Winter Solder investigation”. The major organizers of the so-called “investigation” staged in Detroit in 1971 included Jane Fonda, Dick Gregory, Phil Ochs, Graham Nash, David Crosby, Tom Hayden, Daniel Berrigan actor Donald Sutherland and activist lawyer and writer Mark Lane – the same guy who’d already been revealed as a fake. Also deeply involved in the organization of the event was the Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW) which included John Kerry who was on the VVAW Executive committee.

    Kerry hooked up with an organization called Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW). Two events cooked up by this group went a long way toward cementing in the public mind the image of Vietnam as one big atrocity. The first of these was the January 31, 1971, “Winter Soldier Investigation,” organized by “the usual suspects” among antiwar celebrities such as Jane Fonda, Dick Gregory, and Kennedy-assassination conspiracy theorist, Mark Lane. Here, individuals purporting to be Vietnam veterans told horrible stories of atrocities in Vietnam: using prisoners for target practice, throwing them out of helicopters, cutting off the ears of dead Viet Cong soldiers, burning villages, and gang-raping women as a matter of course.

    To reveal the depth of dishonesty present, Al Hubbard, one of the founders of the VVAW and its Executive Secretary, claimed to be an Air Force pilot, wounded in Viet Nam. In fact, Hubbard was never an officer, never wounded and never in Viet Nam. VVAW members Elton Mazione, John Laboon, Eddie Swetz and Kenneth Van Lesser all claimed to have been a part of the Phoenix program in Viet Nam where they routinely killed children and removed body parts as a part of their duty. They were shown to have never been in the Phoenix program nor had they ever been in Viet Nam. And the list of more frauds later found within the organization is mind-boggling.”

    http://qando.net/archives/002160.htm

  66. Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:14 am | Permalink

    Franklin ignores the simple fact that even if what he alleges is true, it in no way negates the testimony of the many soldiers who did serve and did see atrocities.

    Listening to the CONs, one would think that the My Lai Massacre never happened. Or that a marine in Iraq didn’t throw a puppy off a cliff just for sh!ts and giggles.

  67. Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:15 am | Permalink

    What a pos. Just can’t admit that you screwed up can you Franklin.

    Agnos, you bet your sweet ass I’m showing them that if they defame soldiers then that leaves their service records open to defamation as well. And it should. Of course, Hank believes in a double standard.

    I would not be at all one bit surprised to find out that Nathan was behind some of the discrimination and torment we’re hearing from the Evangelicals in service. I don’t have any proof other than what he says here, but by gollyI can make that claim. He says he’s discussed it, and we know what he means by discussion.

    If he gives other service members the same kind of treatment that he does here for a difference of religion…heck he even attacks CHRISTIANS, imagine what he’d say to non Christians.

    By the way, I feel those kind of offenses deserve a dishonorable discharge.

  68. Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:19 am | Permalink

    Remember that famous photo of the little girl running down the road, her clothes burned off, her arms outstretched so that the charred agonizing skin wouldn’t rub against her body?

    DAMN THOSE VIET CONG FOR DROPPING NAPALM ON KIDS!

    :roll:

  69. Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:24 am | Permalink

    http://judicial-inc.biz/82jjohn_mccain_and_the_uss_forresta.htm

    John McCain and the USS Forrestal Fire

  70. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:24 am | Permalink

    Capn
    That is YOUR take on justice and truth?

    OK, Since we know that some “Crips” have committed murder, why don’t we put ALL Crips in jail for murder?

    OK, Since we know that some “Bloods” have committed murder, why don’t we put ALL Bloods in jail for murder?

    “Group” guilt is what CAUSES atrocity, Capn.

    If you were a cop, would you “plant” evidence, like a gun or drugs, on a suspect, if you “knew” he was guilty, anyway?

    Capn, you are a hypocrite.

    Capn,, you pretend to support civil rights, and the idea that we are all innocent until proven guilty, but you allow yourself to condemn an entire class of people, United States Vietnam Veterans, based on the actions a very, very few!

    Besides, John Kerry is a complete and total fraud.

    Kerry, of all people, has little standing to complain about attacks on his “honor” or “honesty” since Kerry has never been worried, in the past, about making stuff up to win a political point.

    Even so, I still believe that the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth presented an accurate picture of John Kerry.

    At the very least, the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth put FAR more effort into backing up their claims, than Kerry ever did.

    Kerry deliberately lied.

    Kerry deliberately encouraged false charges against our military, by people who had NEVER been to Vietnam, but claimed otherwise, with Kerry’s encouragement and Kerry’s support.

  71. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:26 am | Permalink

    pmom
    Service Records?
    John Kerry has NEVER released his service record, to the public.
    Why?

  72. Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:27 am | Permalink

    Ron Paul on John McCain:

    http://www.dailypaul.com/node/45251

    John McCain – The Manchurian Candidate
    Posted April 6th, 2008 by IamVoting4RonPaul
    The Manchurian Candidate
    America’s Songbird
    By Ernest Stewart

    I am a war criminal; I bombed innocent women and children.
    ~~~ John McCain ~ 60 Minutes CBS 1997 ~~~

    John McCain is the man that the North Vietnamese called “Songbird.” A misnomer, actually. The correct term is stool pigeon. They called him “Songbird” because he told them everything they wanted to know. He was NEVER tortured and was, in fact, given an apartment in Hanoi loaded with two hookers because of his daddy and his singing ability. This guy is not only a traitor but makes Ensign Parker in McHale’s Navy look like an Olympian by comparison. Sound familiar, America?

    McCain is the spoiled rotten “Navy brat” son of a four star admiral whose father was an admiral as well. “Spoiled brat” is how he is described by those who knew young Johnny. Johnny’s dad came to fame, you may recall, as the man who called the F-4 Phantoms back when they were launched to protect the USS Liberty which was under attack from Israeli jets and torpedo boats. He then helped LBJ and Robert S. McNamara cover up that war crime for Tel Aviv.

  73. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:29 am | Permalink

    Capn
    War is an awful thing.

    However, the Vietcong Communists butchered their enemies, as a normal, routine practice.

    The picture you speak of was not a deliberate act, and you know it. The United States did not, deliberately, as a matter of policy, attack women and children.

    The Communists did.

  74. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:30 am | Permalink

    And, by the way, the United States Military completely defeated the Viet Cong, as a fighting force.
    The North Vietnamese Army did almost all of the fighting, towards the end of the war.

  75. Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:30 am | Permalink

    http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/

    Vietnamese tell international press that POW McCain was “singled out for softer treatment”

    A former Vietnamese Communist Party official is claiming Sen. John McCain was “quickly singled out for softer treatment” as a POW because “he was the son of an American admiral. Phung Van Chung, 70, who was a Communist Party official at the time McCain was captured said “top” Vietnamese leaders wanted to use McCain “for negotiations.” Chung also said McCain is refusing “to acknowledge” the heroism of Mai Van On, a Vietnamese peasant who the Vietnamese say swam out during the bombing raid and rescued McCain from drowning. McCain’s refusal to publicly recognize Mai Van On for saving “his life” has some in the media speculating that McCain is afraid that to do so would “fuel other, more damaging allegations that McCain exaggerated elements of his PoW ordeal in Hoa Lo prison. Click here for the full story . . .

  76. Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:31 am | Permalink

    The wife U.S. Republican John McCain callously left behind
    By Sharon Churcher
    McCain likes to illustrate his moral fibre by referring to his five years as a prisoner-of-war in Vietnam. And to demonstrate his commitment to family values, the 71-year-old former US Navy pilot pays warm tribute to his beautiful blonde wife, Cindy, with whom he has four children.
    But there is another Mrs McCain who casts a ghostly shadow over the Senator’s presidential campaign. She is seldom seen and rarely written about, despite being mother to McCain’s three eldest children. Read more . .

    http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/

  77. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:33 am | Permalink

    ben
    I once mentioned, early in the primary, that I was worried about John Kerry’s temper.
    You, Ben, came down on me like a ton of bricks.
    I told you then, Ben, that you would be trashing John McCain worse than anyone, if McCain won the primary.

    My prediction came true today.

  78. outlander
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:36 am | Permalink

    Thanks for posting that Ben. Despicable isn’t it, how some folks, just for political gain, would try to minimize what McCain went through as a POW after he refused early release?

    Soon, they will have McCain participating in torturing Americans.

  79. Monkeyhawk
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:37 am | Permalink

    “Franklin” asserts –

    “The United States did not, deliberately, as a matter of policy, attack women and children.”

    Take a look for yourself:

    http://tinyurl.com/3wzqgt

  80. Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:38 am | Permalink

    Paul – I am simply returning the favor.

    As for Nam – nobody ever denied that the US military could defeat VietNam militarily. After all, we had ships, planes, missles, heavy artillary, etc etc etc. The Vietnamese had rather little in those areas. However, we could not rule VietNam forever without maintaining a huge occupation force. The Vietnamese would continue to resist our occupation.

    Sound familiar?

  81. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:39 am | Permalink

    Despicable isn’t it, how some folks, just for political gain, would try to minimize what Kerry went through as a Viet Nam Vet.

  82. Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:40 am | Permalink

    Valid point outlander. Just like what was done to Kerry.

    I suspect that this time around the Democrats will not just sit back and take it. They will fire back – IN SPADES!

    Interesting to note that the nastiest of the ones I found against McCain came from REPUBLICANS!

  83. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:43 am | Permalink

    Sorry
    Meant to say that I once commented, in the primary, about John McCain’s temper. (Not John Kerry’s temper)
    And, of course, Ben came down very hard on me, defending McCain, at that time.
    I then told Ben that he, Ben, would be trashing McCain, if McCain won the Primary.
    What Ben has said, today, is far, far worse than anything I ever said, during the primary.

  84. Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:45 am | Permalink

    Franklin–

    If you’re going to use the “straw man” fallacy, at least do it so it isn’t patently obvious.

    Of course, not all service men committed atrocities in Vietnam.

    But you say that every atrocity cited by Kerry’s Winter Soldier group was a lie.

    I say it fits a well established pattern of behavior among many troops in Vietnam, no doubt condoned from the top down.

    From Wikipedia–The My Lai Massacre was the mass murder of 347 to 504 unarmed citizens of the Republic of Vietnam (South Vietnam), almost entirely civilians and the majority of them women and children, conducted by U.S. Army forces on March 16, 1968. Some of the victims were sexually abused, beaten, tortured, or maimed, and some of the dead bodies were mutilated. The massacre took place in the hamlets of M? Lai and My Khe of S?n M? village during the Vietnam War.

    “Sometimes you have to destroy a village to save it . . . ”

    *****

    The atrocities that Kerry’s people recounted may not have been entirely accurate in every instance, but they were accurate in the main and consistent with many other sources.

  85. outlander
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:46 am | Permalink

    What did Kerry go through WS, that is comparable to what John McCain went through? Did he go through anything that any other Vietnam vets didn’t go through? Was he a POW for 5 years. Did he get tortured?

    What were his injuries that got him those 3 purple hearts?

    —————–

    “In spades”. I guess that means “complete with lies and exaggerations”?

  86. Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:48 am | Permalink

    As for what the Viet Cong did or didn’t do, that’s entirely irrelevant to the standard of war we demand from our side, under our elected Commander in Chief and paid for with our taxes.

  87. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:48 am | Permalink

    Ben
    If the Vietnamese hated us and did not want us to be in Vietnam —

    Why in the Hell did hundreds of thousands, if not millions of Vietnamese flee to the United States and to other countries?

    Actually, if the liberal Democrat Congress had not tied President Gerald Ford’s hands, we could have very easily prevented the North from taking over the South.

    At the time, of the Communist take over of Saigon, it was a purely conventional war.

    The “gorilla” Viet Cong had been defeated.

    John Kerry and Jane Fonda helped to defeat the United States, politically.

    The United States Military never lost a single battle.

    A small amount of combat air support would have stopped the Communist take over.

    Democrats in Congress would not allow us to help our allies.

  88. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:50 am | Permalink

    Capn
    The people involved in My Lai were appropriately punished.
    Now, Vietnam was a very long conflict.

    Do you have another example?

    No, I did not think so.

  89. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:53 am | Permalink

    “What did Kerry go through WS, that is comparable to what John McCain went through? Did he go through anything that any other Vietnam vets didn’t go through? Was he a POW for 5 years. Did he get tortured?”

    The point was not that Kerry went through as much as McCain. The point was simply that it is hypocritical to declare McCain’s service time to be off limits yet support the trashing of Kerry’s service.

  90. Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:53 am | Permalink

    Damn, you’re right, Franklin.

    We almost won in Vietnam. Ten years and 58,000 deaths. And all we needed was a couple of more air strikes.

    Damn, who knew?

    I got it.

    Why don’t you go over there now–you and Rambo–and take it back?

  91. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:54 am | Permalink

    “A small amount of combat air support would have stopped the Communist take over.”

    Bullshit.

  92. Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:01 pm | Permalink

    Clark–

    Thank you. That was the word I was looking for too:

    bullshit.

    Complete and utter.

  93. okobserver
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:05 pm | Permalink

    Anyone who contributes to this thread and denies the treatment of returning Viet vets was directly tied to the actions of the John Kerrys and Jane Fondas of the day is living in a fantasy land.

    We treated the returning vets with absolutely no respect. They still bear this stigma in many ways.

    Pmom for you to write something like you wrote about Nathan is not worthy of someone who claims to be a thinking person with values even if they are leftwing is despicable. If someone personally attacked your son like you just did what would you do?

    We have to be better than we show on this blog. If not is this country worth saving? Lets all just roll over and let the most vile among us take over.

    Franklin has given some very good evidence of what Kerry was about. How many people go to war with a camcorder in his duffle? How many soldiers staged battle situations so they could tape them? How many soldiers came back and testified to the atrocities committed when he was in Viet? If he did these things why wasn’t he put in the brig and punished? By his own words we know he lied about Cambodia.

    The battle today is between Obama and McCain. Two very different ends of the same spectrum.

  94. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:08 pm | Permalink

    John Kerry helped cut off support to our allies in
    South Vietnam.
    That has already been documented.

    As for the fall of Saigon:
    “Supported by artillery and armor, the North Vietnamese continued to march towards Saigon, capturing the major cities of northern South Vietnam at the end of March—Hu? on the 25th and Da Nang on the 28th. Along the way, disorderly South Vietnamese retreats and the flight of refugees—there were more than 300,000 in Da Nang[5]—damaged South Vietnamese prospects for a turnaround. After the loss of Da Nang, those prospects had already been dismissed as nonexistent by American Central Intelligence Agency officers in Vietnam, who believed nothing short of B-52 strikes against Hanoi could possibly stop the North Vietnamese.[6]

    By 8 April, the North Vietnamese Politburo, which in March had recommended caution to Dung, cabled him to demand “unremitting vigor in the attack all the way to the heart of Saigon.”[7] On 14 April, they renamed the campaign the “Ho Chi Minh campaign,” after revolutionary leader Ho Chi Minh, in the hopes of wrapping it up before his birthday on 19 May.[8] Meanwhile, South Vietnam failed to garner any significant increase in military aid from the United States, killing President Nguyen Van Thieu’s hopes for renewed American support.”
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_of_Saigon
    —-
    “Peace” did not come, with the retreat of American forces.
    More died, in Vietnam, after we left.
    Boat people.
    Poll Pot.
    Communist “re-education” camps.
    Gulags.
    Kum bi AHH!

  95. Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:09 pm | Permalink

    Franklin says they were “appropriately punished.”

    Does it hurt to be as ignorant as you?

    Here are the facts–

    “He fired at it [the baby] with a .45. He missed. We all laughed. He got up three or four feet closer and missed again. We laughed. Then he got up right on top and plugged him.”

    “Some of the people were trying to get up and run. They couldn’t and fell down. This one woman, I remember, she stood up and tried to make it — tried to run — with a small child in her arms. But she didn’t make it. ” —Army photographer Ronald Haeberle

    “ It looks like a bloodbath down there! What the hell is going on? ” —Unidentified helicopter pilot over My Lai

    BBC News described the scene:

    “ Soldiers went berserk, gunning down unarmed men, women, children and babies. Families which huddled together for safety in huts or bunkers were shown no mercy. Those who emerged with hands held high were murdered. … Elsewhere in the village, other atrocities were in progress. Women were gang raped; Vietnamese who had bowed to greet the Americans were beaten with fists and tortured, clubbed with rifle butts and stabbed with bayonets. Some victims were mutilated with the signature “C Company” carved into the chest. By late morning word had got back to higher authorities and a cease-fire was ordered. My Lai was in a state of carnage. Bodies were strewn through the village.[1]

    Warrant Officer Hugh Thompson, Jr., a 24-year-old helicopter pilot from an aero-scout team, witnessed a large number of dead and dying civilians as he began flying over the village — all of them infants, children, women and old men, with no signs of draft-age men or weapons anywhere. Thompson and his crew witnessed an unarmed passive woman kicked and shot at point-blank range by Captain Medina (Medina later claimed that he thought she had a grenade).[19] The crew made several attempts to radio for help for the wounded. They landed their helicopter by a ditch, which they noted was full of bodies and in which there was movement. Thompson asked a Sergeant he encountered there (David Mitchell of the 1st Platoon) if he could help get the people out of the ditch, and the Sergeant replied that he would “help them out of their misery”. Thompson, shocked and confused, had then a conversation with Lieutenant Calley, commanding officer of the 1st Platoon, who claimed to be “just following orders”. As the helicopter took off, they saw Mitchell firing into the ditch.

    *****

    Now what was the punishment: one officer Lt. Calley got 4 and 1/2 months in the stockade.

    That’s it. Period. An entire village of women and children brutally raped, tortured and murdered, and one guy got less time than you or I would get for stealing a car.

  96. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:11 pm | Permalink

    “We treated the returning vets with absolutely no respect.”

    Bullshit. I had friends that served in ‘Nam. I had a friend that died in ‘Nam. I was one of those that actively protested the War.

    I never, ever, ever, saw or even heard of a returning Vet that was treated poorly. Every Vet that I knew was welcomed back with open arms.

    Hell, we used to have parties in their honor!

    Christ.

    “It’s the rules, not the soldiers, that are my real enemies.” Bob Seger – “2 + 2.”

  97. Regular
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:14 pm | Permalink

    What a great public service these Libs are doing.

    You know if they would put their post on the six o’clock news, the American public would see what total nut jobs these people are.

    Then, they would kick Obama and his supporters to the curb and anyone would be a better choice, McCain, Barr or the City Dog Catcher.

    What a bunch of retro, clueless hippies. The libs will write or say anything.

    Clue for ya libs – Go to a fist fight, don’t bring your feel good handbooks and moveon.org print outs. It won’t help ya.

  98. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:14 pm | Permalink

    Capn
    My Lai was a tragedy, and very, very rare in the history of the United States Military.
    Again, do you have another example?

  99. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:16 pm | Permalink

    Capn
    No matter what happened at My Lai, do you support the fabrication of false stories, by people who were never in Vietnam?
    Do you support Kerry’s efforts, to have these “fake soldiers” testify against the United States Government?

  100. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:17 pm | Permalink

    Pol Pot………………..

    “In 1979, he fled into the jungles of southwest Cambodia after an invasion by neighboring Vietnam, which led to the collapse of the Khmer Rouge government. In 1997, Pol Pot was overthrown and imprisoned by other Khmer Rouge leaders. He died in 1998 while under house arrest.”

    Obviously, the downfall of Pol Pot (notice the correct spelling) was due to the Vietnamese invasion. He was not an ally of Vietnamese that benefited from the American departure from SE Asia.

  101. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:19 pm | Permalink

    “Clue for ya libs – Go to a fist fight, don’t bring your feel good handbooks and moveon.org print outs. It won’t help ya.”

    Threatening violence again, McCluer?

  102. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:20 pm | Permalink

    Capn
    Did the Communists ever charge or punish any of their soldiers for “war crimes”?

    No, they did not.

    Which means that the United States was far superior to the Communists, in every way.

    You might not agree with the sentence imposed, in the ONE case you can come up with.

    However, Communists never punish their people for “war crimes” — Communists encourage war crimes.

  103. okobserver
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:21 pm | Permalink

    Well WS I was of that era and saw just the opposite of what you saw and I still today see many Viet vets who tell the stories of how they were welcomed back. It wasn’t pretty. No parties in the streets like after WWII. No special ceremonies. We must have been living in parallel worlds.

    By the time they came back en masse the wheels had been greased by Hanoi Jane and John Kerry. Read some of the stories written by the returning vets. Go to the VA and set down and talk to some vets.

  104. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:22 pm | Permalink

    WS
    There are some words that you mis spell all of the time, as well.
    That is ok.
    It is a good way to make sure that it is really you.

    By the way, didn’t Kerry say that the Khmer Rouge took shots at HIM, during Kerry’s ficticious “Christmas in Cambodia”?

  105. littlejohn
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:23 pm | Permalink

    WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:11 pm | Permalink
    “We treated the returning vets with absolutely no respect.”

    Bullshit. I had friends that served in ‘Nam. I had a friend that died in ‘Nam. I was one of those that actively protested the War.

    I never, ever, ever, saw or even heard of a returning Vet that was treated poorly. Every Vet that I knew was welcomed back with open arms.

    Hell, we used to have parties in their honor!

    Christ.

    “It’s the rules, not the soldiers, that are my real enemies.” Bob Seger – “2 + 2.”

    Regardless of what Bob Seger said, regardless of what you say, I saw and experienced the awful treatment by returning GIs and anybody else in military uniform. San Diego, 1974/5 San Francisco 1974/1975. I too had friend in Viet Nam. I too had friends die in Viet Nam. I too had friggin parties when they got back. Big deal. There was a large compenent that offered nothing but calling the military babykillers. Was it the majority? Probably not. But, I do believe that the Viet Nam era vet did not receive the respect afforded returning vets of other conflicts.

  106. Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:24 pm | Permalink

    “In the rear with the gear” Regular . . . Well, somebody has to arrange the flags on the coffins.

    *****

    Here’s what “So Dumb It Hurts” Franklin left out of source:

    “a memo prepared by the CIA and Army Intelligence and published on 5 March indicated that South Vietnam could hold through the current dry season—i.e. at least until 1976.[3] These predictions proved to be grievously in error.”

    Strangely, when the CIA is grievously in error the first time, that’s to be ignored. But when they claim that the only way to stop the NVA’s advance is to bomb them with B52’s, they must be right.

    Anybody but a die hard revisionist CON knew that Vietnam was lost as soon as we set up a puppet gov’t and renounced in practice our stated goal of bringing self-determination to Vietnam.

    Vietnam was never about Vietnam. It was about showing Communism that we were serious about halting its advance and making the world safe for big multinational companies to exploit workers and steal resources from around the world.

    We lost the Vietnam battle, but we won the war.

    Now the entire world knows the joy of “marketplace discipline.”

  107. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:25 pm | Permalink

    “No parties in the streets like after WWII.”

    There were no parties in the streets because there was no victory.

    And I stand by my statement – I never, ever, ever saw a returning Viet Nam Vet disrespected in any manner.

    Maybe you Okie had a different view than we did in Michigan.

    Everyone of our friends that returned home had a party thrown for them. They did complain, however, about the quality of the pot we had. They said that the stuff they got in ‘Nam was much better.

  108. Jed
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:28 pm | Permalink

    Granny,
    As a constant observer of the Vietnam war protests, I never once saw a returning soldier mistreated. I never heard of a soldier mistreated except from the right-wing extremists. I never heard anyone advocating harrassment of returning soldiers. I certainly listened to what the soldiers had to say, and it wasn’t pretty. Harrassing may have happened on rare occasions, but it was certainly not the temper of the times to mistreat returning soldiers! One of those “absolutely true” urban legends we hear so often that they must be propaganda.

  109. Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:28 pm | Permalink

    “do you support the fabrication of false stories, by people who were never in Vietnam?

    Do you support Kerry’s efforts, to have these fake soldiers testify against the United States Government?”

    *****

    Of course not.

    But the fact that some may have been faked in no way negates the many that were true.

    The American people deserved to know what was done “in our name” and with our money.

  110. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:28 pm | Permalink

    My cousin served in Vietnam.
    He was heart broken that his service was not respected.
    He was actually wounded while trying to save a young child.
    Another child climbed into my cousins tank and shot my cousin with his own, mounted gun.

    I joined the Marines in 1977, in large part as tribute to my cousin and to other vets.

    When I got out of boot camp, my dad came to visit.

    We then visited Busch Gardens and Sea World.

    I was in uniform.

    At both places, I was treated like dirt. Vietnam was still a fresh memory. Saigon had fallen only 2 years before that time.

  111. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:31 pm | Permalink

    “But, I do believe that the Viet Nam era vet did not receive the respect afforded returning vets of other conflicts.”

    Most ‘Nam Vets served a thirteen month tour in country. They returned to the US is relatively small groups. They did not have a “victory” to celebrate. Further, the Viet Nam War did not have the support of the general population of the USA, therefore there wasn’t a lot of celebrating going on.

    Perhaps there were idiots that mistreated returning Vet – I never saw anything close to disrespect. It was my experience that Vets were received, literally, with open arms.

  112. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:34 pm | Permalink

    “At both places, I was treated like dirt.”

    Hate to break this to you, Rossell, but it wasn’t your uniform that garnered the treatment – it was just YOU.

  113. Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:34 pm | Permalink

    From the Toledo Blade–

    On October 19, 2003, the Ohio-based newspaper the Toledo Blade launched a four-day series of investigative reports exposing a string of atrocities by an elite, volunteer, 45-man “Tiger Force” unit of the U.S. Army’s 101st Airborne Division over the course of seven months in 1967. The Blade goes on to state that in 1971 the Army began a four and a half year investigation of the alleged torture of prisoners, rapes of civilian women, the mutilation of bodies and killing of anywhere from nine to well over one hundred unarmed civilians, among other acts. The articles further report that the Army’s inquiry concluded that eighteen U.S. soldiers committed war crimes ranging from murder and assault to dereliction of duty. However, not one of the soldiers, even of those still on active duty at the time of the investigation, was ever court martialed in connection with the heinous crimes. Moreover, six suspected war criminals were allowed to resign from military service during the criminal investigations specifically to avoid prosecution.

    http://hnn.us/articles/1802.html

  114. Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:35 pm | Permalink

    I too had many friends who served in Nam. Like WSC, I treated them with respect. However, not everyone did. Not the VA. Not potential employers. This is based on many long conversations we had together both on campus and elsewhere.

    Paul – why couldn’t the million-man ARVN defeat the NVA. ARVN had more aircraft, more armor, and more men. Until, of course, they faded away.

    Face it – we got involved in a civil war. Of the 25 million or so Vietnamese perhaps 10% were on our side. However, the majority never were.

    That fact contributed to the My Lais that happened. Soldiers felt that every ‘gook’ was out to get them so they readily shot first and asked questions after. Even ARVN were suspect.

    After the US revolution many collaborators fled to Canada. Fortunately for them the bitterness was nothing like that in Nam where 10% of the population died in the war. So it is not at all surprising that those who collaborated with the US often chose to flee.

  115. Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:45 pm | Permalink

    Another McCain-bashing site – from the RIGHT:

    http://www.usvetdsp.com/nov07/mccain_deceit.htm

    With THESE tidbits:

    McCain has forgotten his own history of involvement with betrayal, deceit and corruption

    When McCain returned to the United States in 1973 after more than five years as a prisoner of war, he found his wife was a different person. Carol McCain, once a model, had been badly injured in a car wreck in 1969. The accident “left her 4 inches shorter and on crutches, and she gained a good deal of weight.” Despite her injures, she had refused to allow her POW husband to be notified about her condition, fearing that such news would not be good for him while he was being held prisoner.

    But, just a couple years later, McCain, while pondering a future in politics, met Cindy Hensley, an attractive 25-year-old woman from a very wealthy politically-connected Arizona family. While still married to Carol, McCain began an adulterous relationship with Cindy. He married Cindy in May 1980 — just a month after dumping his crippled wife and securing a divorce.

    McCain followed his young, millionairess wife back to Arizona. Not long after settling in, the former POW newlywed was introduced to Darrow “Duke” Tully, publisher of the conservative and powerful Arizona Republic and the Phoenix Gazette.

    Tully, who quickly became a close friend of McCain, wasted no time in using the power of his newspapers to jump start McCain’s political career. His newspapers endorsed McCain’s first run for Congress and touted him as successor for retiring Sen. Barry Goldwater.

    Described as “equal parts cowboy, commando, swashbuckler and elegant tycoon” by the Chicago Tribune, Tully was “a George Patton who drove a Corvette, a Randolph Hearst who flew an F-16, a John Wayne in aviator glasses and Air Force dress blues.”

    In the senate, McCain managed to stay low key until suddenly he found himself on television trying to explain himself as one of the “Keating 5,” five senators who became enmeshed in the scandal involving the collapsed Lincoln Savings and Loan and the financial machinations of Charles Keating.

    The Arizona Republic – October 17, 1989 — “McCain, in a radio talk-show appearance last week condemned disclosures of his family’s ties to Keating as ‘irresponsible journalism.’”

    The Phoenix Gazette, November 13, 1989 — “Reporters also ‘discovered’ that the senator’s wife and father-in-law invested $359,100.00 in one of Mr. Keating’s projects in 1986 . . .”

    The Arizona Republic, April 29, 1990 — “McCain’s involvement with Keating . . . when reporters called him with questions last year about previously unknown ties to Keating, an investment by wife Cindy McCain in a Keating shopping center and trips to Keating’s Bahamas home, McCain went into a rage.”

  116. ksagnostic
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:48 pm | Permalink

    “Franklin has given some very good evidence of what Kerry was about.”

    Bullsh*t (in the Harry Frankfurt sense). And the fact that you consider what he provides as good evidence reveals a lot about you. “Franklin” posts paragraphs of one line assertions like talking points without any sort of regard between one assertion and another. He uses right wing sites as sources of unimpeachable truth, when the agenda of such sites is obvious. And when he is confronted with conflicting evidence, he ignores it and simply repeats his baseless assertion as if nothing had been said.

    And that, folks, is the very defintion of a shill.

  117. kansasdem
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:51 pm | Permalink

    It’s a moot point now but I often wondered which one of John Kerry’s three Purple Hearts Boone Pickens didn’t like?

    Oh, well so much for supporting our vets.

    Kerry wasn’t the only vet who got trashed. The Republicans then trashed legless Max Cleland, and a few years later, the same bozos turnen on their own, John McCain, in South Carolina and accused him of being the father of a black “illegitimate” baby.

    Judging by some of the witless rhetoric on this thread, there are some angry old white men out there clinging to their guns, their religion and their broadband connections..

  118. Regular
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:54 pm | Permalink

    Fack the Libs, self serving butt wipes.

  119. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 12:58 pm | Permalink

    “Fack the Libs, self serving butt wipes.”

    Damn, McCluer you seem to have a tremendous interest in lib butts.

    What up with that?

  120. Regular
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 1:01 pm | Permalink

    You have a tremendous interest in what I write Clark?

    Why is that? Are you gay for me?

  121. okobserver
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 1:08 pm | Permalink

    Kansasdem I have to admit that part of what you write is true. We staunchly hold on to those things that make us feel righeous and vindicated. Both sides do this. But you know we aren’t hard wired with these thoughts and reactions. We do have the ability to breakout and start thinking for ourselves.

    Personal attacks accomplish nothing but rile the adversary. We are all better than that.

    I have heard and still hear Viet vets talk about the treatment they received when they came home. My brother-in-law who still has schrapnel in his leg from an enemy grenade tells of the day he was injured. A small child, little girl not over 6 just walked into their encampment. He was a yoeman and spent his time in a tent typing and receiving orders for the men in combat. When he heard the call to take cover the only thing he saw was that little girl. In her hand was the grenade just waiting for her to release the pin. He made it to a trench but still bears a reminder of that day. He earned a Purple Heart that day but he has never shown it to anyone that I know of. The vets came back ashamed of what they did. The atmosphere of our country did that.

    That war was a lot like the one we are fighting today. They didn’t know who the enemy was. Surely it wasn’t the little girl who walked in with that grenade and blew herself up. I was against that war. My friends fought in it and many didn’t return.

    There are no clear answers where war is concerned. I know that when Kerry went before congress and told what my friends told me were lies I didn’t like him then and I wanted this war to end.

  122. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    The libs on this Blog accept the “Dan Rather test for truth” —
    If it FITS their prejudice, it MUST be true, huh?

    KsAg
    Do you ever consider trying to refute anything that I have posted?
    Yes, there has been some, small amount of controversy around my opinions.
    My opinion is that the United States could have defeeated the North Vietnamese Army, but we were prevented from doing so by the liberal Democrats in Congress.
    However, it is a FACT that we did defeat the Viet Cong.

    Another fact?
    John Kerry lied, repeatedly.
    Do you care to refute that point?

    All I have seen is stuff about My Lai. Did Kerry ever witness My Lai? NO, he did not.

    Did Kerry encourage people who had NEVER been to Vietnam to LIE about “war crimes” they NEVER saw?
    Yes, Kerry did encourage others to lie.

    Did Kerry use the Carter Amnesty Program?

    Yes, he certainly did.

    Did Nixon order Kerry into Cambodia, over Christmas?

    NO, Nixon was not even President, at that time!

    Go find some forged documents on Microsoft Word to back up your side of the story.

    Dan Rather might return your calls!

  123. HLP
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    “It’s a moot point now but I often wondered which one of John Kerry’s three Purple Hearts Boone Pickens didn’t like?”

    LOL!

    What purple hearts? He threw them over the fence!

  124. Posted June 25, 2008 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

    http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,999812,00.html?promoid=googlep

    For former Senator Bob Kerrey, that nightmare never goes away. He knows that one night 32 years ago in Vietnam, he and his squad of Navy SEALs killed nearly a score of unarmed civilians, mainly women and children. The shame and guilt and remorse have haunted him since. He did not want to make his personal anguish public any more than other Americans want to dredge up the nation’s agony again. But because a fellow SEAL who lived through the same nightmare that night has come forward with an even more damning chain of events than Kerrey admits to, his private pain is reopening hard questions about war, memory and guilt.

    . . . .

    “We used lethal procedures when there was doubt,” he [Kerrey] said. “When we received fire, we returned fire. But when the firing stopped, we found that we had killed only women, children and older men. It was not a military victory; it was a tragedy, and I had ordered it.”

    . . .

    These reports take a condemning view of the raid, strongly suggesting that Kerrey is wrong when he says the civilian deaths were the tragic consequence of the fog of war, and that the former squad mate, Gerhard Klann, is right when he says the killings were a deliberate execution.

    Yet one member of Kerrey’s squad says that is what the SEALs did that night. Gerhard Klann, the veteran among Kerrey’s green tyros, told the Times Magazine and 60 Minutes II that the five villagers knifed in the first hooch were, in fact, an old man, his wife, two young girls and a boy. He said Kerrey ordered the killing and personally helped him cut the old man’s throat.

    Klann said he heard no incoming fire as the squad entered Thanh Phong. He said that when they failed to find the Viet Cong official, Kerrey ordered the SEALs to round up the unarmed women and children in the hooches. Then, Klann said, “an order was given” to shoot them. “We lined up, and we opened fire.” A baby was the last one alive, Klann told the Times Magazine. “There were blood and guts splattering everywhere.”

  125. Phantom
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 1:46 pm | Permalink

    Pickens is a Weclch. Good luck collecting. In other news Viet Vets against McCain ran an article that McCain received preferential treatment as a pow, and showed his gratitude to the North Vietnamese villager that pulled him out of the brink, from drowning, a cheap Senate Seal decal!

  126. Phantom
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 1:47 pm | Permalink

    oops Welch Drink

  127. lindainks55
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 1:47 pm | Permalink

    Vietnam was the war of my generation. My husband, many relatives, many friends served during that time; some came home with injuries, some came home in coffins. They did what they were ordered to do. They killed, if necessary, to keep from being killed.

    The ones I know were welcomed home by loving families and friends. It wasn’t what they faced when they got home that keeps them quiet about that part of their life. I know some who became more angry and disillusioned when they couldn’t get their illnesses even recognized by the government they served, let alone get treatment. There were some affects of war that finally were recognized after long years. Others still never have been.

    In the rare times we talk, they still wonder what was accomplished. It wasn’t a just war. They feel like there should have been something accomplished for the kinds of sacrifices made.

  128. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 1:49 pm | Permalink

    John Kerry has blocked human rights legislation that would help the minority populations in Communist Vietnam:

    http://vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.org/kerry_human_rights.htm

    “In spite of pleas from Vietnamese Americans, human rights activists and veteran’s groups, Senator JOHN KERRY (D-MA) successfully sabotaged the Vietnam Human Rights Act (Senate Bill HR-2833). By doing so Kerry literally facilitated the communist Vietnamese efforts to exterminate the Christian hill tribe peoples living in the Central Highlands region of Vietnam.

    The Bill was designed to sanction communist Vietnam for its calculated sterilization, terrorism and genocide of the hill tribe people commonly known to westerners as the MONTAGNARDS.

    MONTAGNARD hill tribesmen are ethnically unrelated to the Vietnamese. The Central Highlands region has been the home of the MONTAGNARDS for at least a 1,000 years.

    As late as 1970 there were an estimated 3,000,000 Montagnards in various tribes living in the Vietnam region. As a direct result of Vietnam’s ongoing campaign of ethnic extermination, the total population of Montagnards is now BELOW 650,000. This unadulterated genocide has taken nearly two thirds of the Montagnards in only 34 years, including more than half the male population.”

  129. Phantom
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 1:49 pm | Permalink

    What do we know about McCain’s serivce? 1) he was instrumental in the worst naval disaster, the Forester, during the Viet war. 2) He managed to get shot down. 3) He was rescued by the other side. 4) He received preferential treatment as a pow.
    My kind of war hero.

  130. Posted June 25, 2008 at 1:52 pm | Permalink

    http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-vietnam6aug06,1,2479259.story?ctrack=1&cset=true

    Civilian Killings Went Unpunished

    Declassified papers show U.S. atrocities went far beyond My Lai.

    By Nick Turse and Deborah Nelson, Special to The Times August 6, 2006

    The files are part of a once-secret archive, assembled by a Pentagon task force in the early 1970s, that shows that confirmed atrocities by U.S. forces in Vietnam were more extensive than was previously known.

    The documents detail 320 alleged incidents that were substantiated by Army investigators — not including the most notorious U.S. atrocity, the 1968 My Lai massacre.

    Though not a complete accounting of Vietnam war crimes, the archive is the largest such collection to surface to date. About 9,000 pages, it includes investigative files, sworn statements by witnesses and status reports for top military brass.

    The records describe recurrent attacks on ordinary Vietnamese — families in their homes, farmers in rice paddies, teenagers out fishing. Hundreds of soldiers, in interviews with investigators and letters to commanders, described a violent minority who murdered, raped and tortured with impunity.

    Abuses were not confined to a few rogue units, a Times review of the files found. They were uncovered in every Army division that operated in Vietnam.

    Retired Brig. Gen. John H. Johns, a Vietnam veteran who served on the task force, says he once supported keeping the records secret but now believes they deserve wide attention in light of alleged attacks on civilians and abuse of prisoners in Iraq.

    “We can’t change current practices unless we acknowledge the past,” says Johns, 78.

    Among the substantiated cases in the archive:

    • Seven massacres from 1967 through 1971 in which at least 137 civilians died.

    • Seventy-eight other attacks on noncombatants in which at least 57 were killed, 56 wounded and 15 sexually assaulted.

    • One hundred forty-one instances in which U.S. soldiers tortured civilian detainees or prisoners of war with fists, sticks, bats, water or electric shock.

    . . . .

    In a letter to Westmoreland in 1970, an anonymous sergeant described widespread, unreported killings of civilians by members of the 9th Infantry Division in the Mekong Delta — and blamed pressure from superiors to generate high body counts.

    “A batalion [sic] would kill maybe 15 to 20 [civilians] a day. With 4 batalions in the brigade that would be maybe 40 to 50 a day or 1200 to 1500 a month, easy,” the unnamed sergeant wrote. “If I am only 10% right, and believe me it’s lots more, then I am trying to tell you about 120-150 murders, or a My Lay [sic] each month for over a year.”

    The newspaper article continues on for 8 more pages . . .

  131. Posted June 25, 2008 at 1:59 pm | Permalink

    http://www.thenation.com/blogs/notion?pid=109065

    The stories are terrible. “Kill anything that moves” – that’s what one company of American soldiers was told when they set out on a sweep of the rice paddies on Vietnam’s central coast in February 1968, according to Jamie Henry, at the time a 20-year old medic. So they shot and killed 19 unarmed civilians, women and children. When Henry got home to California, he held a news conference describing the slaughter, but there was no official response. Now we learn that the army did investigate his report — and concluded it was accurate – but did nothing to punish the guilty.

    The official line that abuses were “confined to a few rogue units” is demolished by the material Turse discovered. Atrocities were committed, according to the Times, by “every army division that operated in Vietnam.” They found a pattern of “recurrent attacks on ordinary Vietnamese–families in their homes, farmers in rice paddies, teenagers out fishing,” who were “murdered, raped and tortured with impunity” by American soldiers.

  132. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 1:59 pm | Permalink

    Capn
    You are still dancing around the questions:

    Do you think it is OK for John Kerry to make stuff up?

    Do you think it OK for John Kerry to encourage others to make stuff up?

    John Kerry is an opportunist.

    John Kerry packed his camera with him, wanting to pad his political resume with “war hero” film footage.

    Then, Kerry comes home and decides to go “anti war” and makes stuff up about the war.

    Then, Kerry runs for President as a “war hero” —

    What a joke of a human being.

  133. okobserver
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 2:03 pm | Permalink

    Linda you and I share the memories of this time in our history. Our memories aren’t that different. I was struck though with what has happened to our goals since then.

    They were denied many benefits. Agent orange wasn’t recognized for the insidious contaminant it was until the last few years. We had vets fighting the effects of it being turned down for treatment. This is why I don’t question the treatment of any veteran. I think they worked hard to gain that benefit. When I read some on here calling their treatment welfare it upsets me greatly.

    Something happens through the years to solidify our beliefs and political persuasions. That is where we are on this blog. Worlds apart on some things but very close on others.

    We will all see dirty tactics used in this election just as we have in every election. It will be our responsibility as voters to wade through the waste and pick out the truths.

  134. Posted June 25, 2008 at 2:03 pm | Permalink

    http://articles.latimes.com/2006/aug/07/world/fg-tribunal7

    Scene of Slain Iraqi Family Described
    By Louise Roug
    August 07, 2006

    An Iraqi army medic testifying in a hearing to determine whether four U.S. soldiers will face a court-martial on rape and murder charges said Sunday that he saw a family of four who had been slain in their home, including a 14-year-old girl whose head and upper body had been burned and clothes torn away.

    Entering the family’s house in the southern Baghdad suburb of Mahmoudiya on March 12, the medic said, he found the girl with a single bullet wound under her left eye and with her legs spread.

    In an adjacent room, the medic said, he found the girl’s 5-year-old sister, who had been shot, the bullet smashing the back of her head.

    Next to the younger girl was the body of her father, Kasim Hamza Rasheed, who also had been shot in the head.

    “The brain was on the floor, and parts of the head were all over the place,” the medic said of Rasheed’s body.

    The mother, Fakhriya Taha Muhsen, had been shot repeatedly in the abdomen and chest, the medic said.

    “I was sick for almost two weeks,” he added.

    ******

    Did it really happen? Was it ever punished?

    Have no fear, truth-seekers, we’ll find out . . . in forty years.

  135. Posted June 25, 2008 at 2:06 pm | Permalink

    Franklin–

    It’s you who refuse to acknoledge the elephant in the room.

    Atrocities were routinely committed in Vietnam.

    What Kerry said was true.

    But you CONs didn’t want to hear the truth in ‘71 and you don’t want to hear it now.

  136. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 2:14 pm | Permalink

    Capn
    Kerry LIED!
    Kerry saw nothing.
    Kerry made stuff up.

    Capn,
    Try this, you were alive when John Lennon was shot, were you not?
    If you testified that you witnessed that event, you would be a liar.
    The fact that Lennon was shot would not absolve you of your falsehood.

    John Kerry is a liar.

  137. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

    John Kerry is ALSO partly responsible for the current human rights abuses, murders and genocide in Vietnam.
    John Kerry kisses so much Communist ass that Kerry refuses to hold Vietnam accountable for current genocide.

  138. Posted June 25, 2008 at 2:26 pm | Permalink

    “John Kerry is ALSO partly responsible for the current human rights abuses, murders and genocide in Vietnam.”

    What’s that word I’m looking for again?

    Ah, now I remember–

    Bullshit.

  139. Posted June 25, 2008 at 2:28 pm | Permalink

    Christians are getting murdered by the thousands in Iraq under our watch and as a direct result of our overthrow of Saddam Hussein.

    Strange silence from the CONs on that . . .

  140. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 2:36 pm | Permalink

    CapnAmerica,

    Were you quoting Bible verses again….

    So which Bible verses do you believe?

    Obviously you don’t believe any of them that point to the whole basic fundamental truth of being a Christian….. having faith in Christ.

    Why do you believe the ones you quote here?

    Now you act like you actually care about Christians being killed in Iraq? Yeah right.

  141. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 2:39 pm | Permalink

    So let me follow the liberal logic today…

    We have a political discussion about Kerry and how he used his service record in the 2004 election and how the Swift Boat Veterens questioned that, so you get to make rude comments about those in the discussion?

    With that kind of logic every time you say one bad thing about Bush, which you do daily, we get to say bad things about your family too.

    Right?

    The stupidity of you liberals on this blog continues to amaze me.

    And Linda the biggest blog Hypocrite continues to show why she is the champion of that title.

  142. Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 2:47 pm | Permalink

    That’s fantastic, Ill never feel bad about attacking Nathan’s service or Hanks from this point out.

    Good to know its all fair game.

    supporting soldiers my rear, you’ve done more harm that spitting ever could.

  143. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    Political Mama,

    When did you feel bad for it before?

    LOL, now you are a liar for pretending you ever felt bad about the crap you spew here.

  144. Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 2:50 pm | Permalink

    The Swift Boaters didn’t merely QUESTION it Nathan, they flat out lied and defamed. I’m sure you’re just as proud as your father is.

    Don’t you have some converting to do? Go ahead and try to convert some of the Shiites will ya?
    Maybe you can talk religion with some of the Iraqi Christians.

  145. Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 2:51 pm | Permalink

    And you show me where I ever attacked you service?

  146. Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 2:52 pm | Permalink

    the ones denying the attrocities probably committed them.

  147. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 2:53 pm | Permalink

    Political Mama,

    Not only are you a liar, but you are a stupid one at that:

    “I hope your son gets beaten up for his service as much as Kerry did.”

  148. Phantom
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 2:55 pm | Permalink

    Three words. Free Fire Zone!

  149. Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 2:56 pm | Permalink

    i’m glad that you agree Grm that Agent Orange people deserve treatment. Now since my father has fought that battle for 30 years with the government denials, won’t you tell Bush to sign the dang settlement so my dad can finally get the money he deserves?

    3 million….and still not a dime. Still waiting, probably till he dies.

  150. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 2:56 pm | Permalink

    I have spoken with an Iraqi Christian. One who was captured by the terrorists in Iraq for being an interpreter and guide for American forces, and talked his way to freedom after being tortured and went right back to helping us.

  151. Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    Before today nathan. Can’t do it can you idiot.

  152. okobserver
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    Pmom your dad needs to go back to the VA because they are now acknowledging that agent orange was a carcinogenic. He needs to keep at it until he is taken care of.

    http://www.vva.org/agent_orange.html

    This website lists many, many, many diseases that are covered under this.

    This makes me think even less of you for your slap at our military men who qualify for care.

  153. ANTI
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 3:20 pm | Permalink

    Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 2:42 pm | Permalink
    When is someone going to grow some balls and ask if he called his wife a McC*unt without letting him skirt it.

    —–
    PM, How about you grow some balls and show us proof that he said that. Don’t skirt it!

  154. Phantom
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    Agent Orange is only recognized for some approved conditions. If he has something else, he’s sol.

  155. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 3:47 pm | Permalink

    Political Mama,

    Obviously attacking my service wasn’t an issue between you and I until today. Hence this entire conversation.

    You act as if you are no longer going to feel bad about attacking me, yet you never showed how you felt bad to begin with. I point this out and you demand that I show you where you attacked me, I do and you say show you where before today, well before today this was not an issue…

    You really can’t be this stupid can you?

    If we really wanted to take this to the real logical extreme, those attacking Kerry actually served. So, if you want to attack my service, you need to have served as well.

  156. Jed
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 3:52 pm | Permalink

    P-Mom
    “When is someone going to grow some balls and ask if he called his wife a McC*unt without letting him skirt it.”

    Actually, it says an awful lot more about his wife than it does about him. Any self-respecting WOMAN would have dumped his chauvinist ass in the middle of the street and hired the meanest divorce lawyer in the state for a public comment like that!

  157. okobserver
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 3:54 pm | Permalink

    Phantom if you went to that site you will see there is a very long list of every possible complication of agent orange exposure. If you have something else maybe it wasn’t from that exposure.

  158. littlejohn
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 3:57 pm | Permalink

    Jed
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 3:52 pm | Permalink
    P-Mom
    “When is someone going to grow some balls and ask if he called his wife a McC*unt without letting him skirt it.”

    Actually, it says an awful lot more about his wife than it does about him. Any self-respecting WOMAN would have dumped his chauvinist ass in the middle of the street and hired the meanest divorce lawyer in the state for a public comment like that!”

    You mean, Like Hillary did? Oh, his comment wasn’t public, his act was private. Public statements are so much worse than private acts.
    Huh.

  159. Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:06 pm | Permalink

    “I have spoken with an Iraqi Christian.”

    Gee, that’s nice, Nathan.

    Did you speak with him recently?

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/04/21/ST2008042103252.html

    Iraqi Christians Struggle With Fear After Slayings
    Recent Priest Killings Follow Years of Violence, Leaders Say

    Violence in Iraq has declined dramatically since last year, but members of the country’s Christian denominations say they are increasingly under threat.

    In March, Paulos Faraj Rahho, archbishop of Mosul’s Chaldean community, was found dead after being abducted. This month, Youssef Adel, an Assyrian Orthodox priest, was fatally shot in a drive-by attack in Karrada, one of Baghdad’s safest neighborhoods and home to Abdal’s Holy Catholic Assyrian Church.

    Dozens of churches, monasteries and other buildings have been firebombed, looted or occupied by Muslims since June 2004, according to Assyrian church leaders. Christian relief organizations describe the plight of Iraqi Christians as “ethnic cleansing.”

    The Iraqi Christian population numbered 1.35 million before the Persian Gulf War in 1991, according to politicians who cite government statistics from the time. That number has dropped by at least half, according to politicians, priests and religious organizations, mainly because Christians have fled the country in the years since the U.S.-led invasion in 2003.

    ******

    Thanks to the Christians Bush and Nathan, Christians in Iraq can now be persecuted with impunity.

    “Mission Accomplished.”

  160. okobserver
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:06 pm | Permalink

    Jed doesn’t it seem a little cowardly of you and Pmom to denounce McCain for something we don’t even know happened and the left still defends Slick Willy for something worse that we know happened.

    Is the irony lost on you?

  161. Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:07 pm | Permalink

    Oh, well . . . at least HALLIBURTON is doing well!

  162. Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:12 pm | Permalink

    I don’t defend Clinton for anything he did.

    He was the best REPUBLICAN president we ever had.

    That said, he didn’t deserve to be accused of drug running and killing Vince Foster, like Jerry Falwell the nutbag said he did . . .

  163. Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    I’ve always believed that Clinton should have resigned after cheating on his wife and lying to the American public about it.

    If he had, Al Gore would have become president. Al Gore would not have had the election stolen from him in 2000.

    And we wouldn’t be bogged down in war without end and a 9 TRILLION DOLLAR DEBT under

    Worst.
    President.
    Ever.

  164. outlander
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:18 pm | Permalink

    “Actually, it says an awful lot more about his wife than it does about him. Any self-respecting WOMAN would have dumped his chauvinist ass in the middle of the street and hired the meanest divorce lawyer in the state for a public comment like that!”- Jedidiah

    —————-

    Or maybe it never happened, eh Jed? I mean, since there were no witnesses. Well, except for the alleged “anonymous” witnesses.

    I personally have found that anonymous witnesses are much more reliable than real live witnesses. Real witnesses can say things that you don’t expect and are subject to forgetting details etc..

    Yep, anonymous witnesses are definitely the way to go if you are going to smear someone.

  165. Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:23 pm | Permalink

    An affair that was supposed to be kept private and calling your wife a c in public, two totally different things.

    Both disrespectful and not very smart, but one shows a seething hatred of women, the other shows…well a guy who loves the ladies too much.

    WS never misses an opportunity to bash a clinton.

    Nathan, I’ve never been more disgusted with someone who would attack soldiers until your FATHER showed how purely acceptable it is.

    If you’re going to dish it out, expect to get it back.

    GRM, my dad already went to court and proved that it was Agent Orange. He used to haul the barrels and sat in it fully concentrated which left him without skin on his behind for weeks. There is no question. he was awarded the money….all that has to be done now is for Bush to sign off on it and pay up.

    Of course this all happened before I was born. And people question why Ihave such diseases in my family….

  166. littlejohn
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:29 pm | Permalink

    “Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:23 pm | Permalink
    An affair that was supposed to be kept private and calling your wife a c in public, two totally different things.

    Both disrespectful and not very smart, but one shows a seething hatred of women, the other shows…well a guy who loves the ladies too much.”

    Yeah, and his letting Hillary go out and defend him, and make a fool out of herself? THe whole “vast right wing conspiracy” comment? Bill made a fool out of her. Any self-respecting woman would have just dumped his ass. So, calling a woman a bad name (if it happened) is worse than an affair? Don;t be a Clinton apologist. It is unbecoming of you. What happened to the Hillary “I’m not the stand by your man” kinda woman? Lost her self respect, I guess. At least, according to Jed.

  167. ANTI
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:30 pm | Permalink

    Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 2:42 pm | Permalink
    When is someone going to grow some balls and ask if he called his wife a McC*unt without letting him skirt it.

    —–
    Once more,
    PM, How about you grow some balls and show us proof that he said that. Don’t skirt it!

  168. Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

    I offer proof that he has not denied the comment.

    That’s pretty much telling enough don’t you think? Come on, you know he said it. Or else he’d had stopped this long before now.

    As far as Hillary and Bill, there are plenty who have survived affairs. Yes it made Hillary look foolish, however, women around the world have been in her shoes. I think she was stronger to had stayed and worked it out rather than leaving.

  169. ANTI
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:35 pm | Permalink

    PM, You are just another Leftist hack who makes insane claims with NOTHING to back them up. You are a snake upon the ground. Now, slither away.

  170. Jed
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    lj,
    I think it’s been fairly evident that Bill has paid and is still paying royally for screwing around on Hillary. He’s very lucky to not have been dumped in the middle of Pennsylvania Ave. the day after, with half a size 7 wedgie sticking out of his backside.

    Cindy just smiles and says the inanities her husband tells her to, and for that gets treated to about the worst public insults a husband can deliver. Of course it helps that she suffers a short-term memory deficit.

  171. ANTI
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:37 pm | Permalink

    Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:34 pm | Permalink
    I offer proof that he has not denied the comment.
    ——

    That is all you have???

  172. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:38 pm | Permalink

    What seems to be totally lost on the liberals on this thread is this:

    You demand 100% accuracy from those who attack John Kerry.

    However,

    You do NOT expect John Kerry to tell the truth about other Veterans.

    Kerry opened these wounds. Kerry obviously lied, repeatedly. Kerry obviously encouraged other people to lie.

    But now, those of us who question Kerry must back up everything we say?

    Hypocrites.

  173. Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:40 pm | Permalink

    Franklin
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 1:49 pm | Permalink
    John Kerry has blocked human rights legislation that would help the minority populations in Communist Vietnam:

    http://vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.org/kerry_human_rights.htm

    “In spite of pleas from Vietnamese Americans, human rights activists and veteran’s groups, Senator JOHN KERRY (D-MA) successfully sabotaged the Vietnam Human Rights Act (Senate Bill HR-2833). By doing so Kerry literally facilitated the communist Vietnamese efforts to exterminate the Christian hill tribe peoples living in the Central Highlands region of Vietnam.

    The Bill was designed to sanction communist Vietnam for its calculated sterilization, terrorism and genocide of the hill tribe people commonly known to westerners as the MONTAGNARDS.

    MONTAGNARD hill tribesmen are ethnically unrelated to the Vietnamese. The Central Highlands region has been the home of the MONTAGNARDS for at least a 1,000 years.

    As late as 1970 there were an estimated 3,000,000 Montagnards in various tribes living in the Vietnam region. As a direct result of Vietnam’s ongoing campaign of ethnic extermination, the total population of Montagnards is now BELOW 650,000. This unadulterated genocide has taken nearly two thirds of the Montagnards in only 34 years, including more than half the male population.”

  174. littlejohn
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:42 pm | Permalink

    “Jed
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:36 pm | Permalink
    lj,
    I think it’s been fairly evident that Bill has paid and is still paying royally for screwing around on Hillary. He’s very lucky to not have been dumped in the middle of Pennsylvania Ave. the day after, with half a size 7 wedgie sticking out of his backside.”

    I agree. And don;t really care. Bill is old news. My comparison had nothing to do with John McCain and BIll Clinton. It had to do with your comment about Cindi McCain not being a self-respecting woman for not kicking his ass out. My comment was then that Hillary must not be a self -respecting woman. In my opinion, bad a McCain’s statement was, if commited, it does not compare with Bill’s activities, and worse than the affair, letting his wife, his family, and his supporters go out in public and denying it for him, knowing full well the truth. He made an ass out of all of them, in my opinion. She should have dropped him. If not before leaving office, certainly thereafter.

  175. Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:42 pm | Permalink

    http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/

    Vietnamese tell international press that POW McCain was “singled out for softer treatment”

    A former Vietnamese Communist Party official is claiming Sen. John McCain was “quickly singled out for softer treatment” as a POW because “he was the son of an American admiral. Phung Van Chung, 70, who was a Communist Party official at the time McCain was captured said “top” Vietnamese leaders wanted to use McCain “for negotiations.” Chung also said McCain is refusing “to acknowledge” the heroism of Mai Van On, a Vietnamese peasant who the Vietnamese say swam out during the bombing raid and rescued McCain from drowning. McCain’s refusal to publicly recognize Mai Van On for saving “his life” has some in the media speculating that McCain is afraid that to do so would “fuel other, more damaging allegations that McCain exaggerated elements of his PoW ordeal in Hoa Lo prison. Click here for the full story . .

  176. outlander
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:50 pm | Permalink

    If this looks like deja vu, posting this again cause Ben posted his cut and paste again.

    #
    outlander
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:36 am | Permalink

    Thanks for posting that Ben. Despicable isn’t it, how some folks, just for political gain, would try to minimize what McCain went through as a POW after he refused early release?

    Soon, they will have McCain participating in torturing Americans.

  177. Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    Just reminding Rossell that when he repeat-posts his stuff the favor can be returned.

  178. KansasNative
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    So is Mr Duyet implying that that Senator McCain lied about his treatment at the Hanoi Hilton?
    “He did not tell the truth,” he says.
    “But I can somehow sympathise with him. He lies to American voters in order to get their support for his presidential election.”

  179. KansasNative
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

    While being treated in the hospital, McCain made a series of propaganda statements for the communist including at least one television interview during which he gave specific “military information” pertaining to his mission. McCain was quoted in the communist press describing the number of aircraft in his flight, information about rescue ships and the order of which his attack was supposed to take place.

  180. KansasNative
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 5:10 pm | Permalink

    from “The Real McCain”

    Three reporters from Arizona, on the condition of anonymity, also let me in on another incident involving McCain’s intemperateness. In his 1992 Senate bid, McCain was joined on the campaign trail by his wife, Cindy, as well as campaign aide Doug Cole and consultant Wes Gullett. At one point, Cindy playfully twirled McCain’s hair and said, “You’re getting a little thin up there.” McCain’s face reddened, and he responded, “At least I don’t plaster on the makeup like a trollop, you c###.” McCain’s excuse was that it had been a long day. If elected president of the United States, McCain would have many long days.

  181. KansasNative
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 5:13 pm | Permalink

    McCain was awarded a Silver Star Medal for resisting “extreme mental and physical cruelties” inflicted upon him by his captors from late October to early December 1967, the exact time frame during which McCain was in the hospital making propaganda statements for the enemy in exchange for medical treatment.

  182. KansasNative
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    US Military Code of Conduct which McShame violated numerous times:

    V. When questioned, should I become a prisoner of war, I am bound to only give name, rank, service number, and date of birth. I will evade answering further questions to the utmost of my ability. I will make no oral or written statements disloyal to my country and its allies or harmful to their cause.

  183. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 5:42 pm | Permalink

    Political Mama,

    I have served 12 years in the Marine Corps.

    My father served 22 years in the Navy.

    The SWIFT BOAT Veterans are just that… Veterans who served in Swift Boats.

    What have you done? How many years have you served?

    You have no place to question my service or to attack my service.

    You are nothing more than some liberal on a blog who has her panties in a wad because we dare to question one of your failed liberal heros.

    When you serve Honorably in the military your word will be worth something.

    Until then? Just another stupid liberal on this blog.

    The only thing you should be saying to me is Thank you, you ungreatful worthless piece of crap.

  184. Phantom
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 5:46 pm | Permalink

    ” have spoken with an Iraqi Christian. One who was captured by the terrorists in Iraq for being an interpreter and guide for American forces, and talked his way to freedom after being tortured and went right back to helping us.”

    I’m getting this mental image of Nathan and Al-Quida plant(s) conducting a bible study class, and during intermission, discussing the characteristics of the U.S. weapon systems!

  185. Phantom
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 5:47 pm | Permalink

    I bet he quickly gave his name, “I’m John Sydney McCain,I’m the Admiral’s son, my grandpa was an Admiral too!”

  186. Posted June 25, 2008 at 5:50 pm | Permalink

    Wife 1.0:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1024927/The-wife-John-McCain-callously-left-behind.html

    The wife U.S. Republican John McCain callously left behind

    I just LOVE those GOP family values!

  187. Phantom
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 5:52 pm | Permalink

    He’ll need those values, and may even have to borrow some from Brownback to overcome his opposition from the hay seeds.

  188. Phantom
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 5:53 pm | Permalink

    Fortunately for Cindy (I guess) she wasn’t left debilitated by her stroke!

  189. Kev
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 5:57 pm | Permalink

    The swift boaters and groups like them are why Obama was SMART and refused to be hemmed in by public fiancing! Good for Obama! Bad for Kerry.

  190. KansasNative
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 6:02 pm | Permalink

    Nathan…you were paid for your service.

    No one owes you a damned thing.

  191. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 6:12 pm | Permalink

    KansasNative,

    That is why you are nothing but a sorry liberal piece of crap too.

  192. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 6:17 pm | Permalink

    “WS never misses an opportunity to bash a clinton.”

    Huh? I have spent the better part of fifteen years defending Bill Clinton – read my posts.

    What the Hell did I say or do to deserve that ad hominim attack?

  193. KansasNative
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 6:18 pm | Permalink

    My my Nathan…little testy tonight even after daddy defended you all day long?

    What do we owe you?

    You were hired to do a job…you did it…you got paid.

    Now your employer would rather hire high school dropouts and ex cons than keep you with all your training.

    Kiss your daddy’s ass ’cause he taught you to have your hand out expecting something for nothing.

    You’ve been brainwashed by your dad Nathan

    Grow up, be a man and live your life instead of letting daddy continue to define who you are.

    If I’m a piece of crap, then you can eat me asswipe!

  194. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 6:24 pm | Permalink

    “The only thing you should be saying to me is Thank you, you ungreatful worthless piece of crap.”

    Okay, thank you you ungrateful (notice the correct spelling) worthless piece of crap.

    Feel better now, Price?

  195. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 6:41 pm | Permalink

    KansasNative,

    What do you know about my employer and me? Apparently nothing.

    As I have said several times on this blog about the conditions surrounding my deployment and you either ignore them or are too stupid to grasp the concept.

    How many days have you served? Yet you question my service?

    If you were not hiding behind some nic, I would come eat you, you retard.

  196. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 6:42 pm | Permalink

    WS Clark,

    I probably don’t feel as good as you do with those little boys.

  197. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 6:43 pm | Permalink

    WS Clark,

    When was your last AIDS test?

    If you stopped sleeping with those South Broadway girls you probably wouldn’t have to get tested so regularly.

  198. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 6:45 pm | Permalink

    KansasNative,

    It is not me on this blog representing the left wing government socialism solution like you and your butt buddy JR.

    As you clearly point out, I worked for my money.

    I don’t have my hand out for anything.

    Perhaps you should spend some more time talking to JR about that concept instead of fondling him?

  199. KansasNative
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 6:48 pm | Permalink

    Fine outstanding example of what it means to be a CHRISTIAN…huh Price?

    Grovel for “thankyou”s all you want Nathan.

    Be a beggar…make daddy Hank proud.

  200. KansasNative
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 6:50 pm | Permalink

    Nathan…what’s with the male to male fantasies?

    Is that why you were let go by the Marines?

    Were you found out and now you have to live a lie because daddy would hate you if you are a “faggot”?

  201. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 6:52 pm | Permalink

    “I probably don’t feel as good as you do with those little boys.”

    Way out of line, Price. That is disgusting even for you.

    “If you stopped sleeping with those South Broadway girls you probably wouldn’t have to get tested so regularly.”

    I wouldn’t know, Price, I have never visited a prostitute. Apparently, you know something about it.

    As for HIV/AIDS testing? Responsible sexually active adults do take precautions, something a cherry boy like you has no need to do.

    “If you were not hiding behind some nic, I would come eat you, you retard.”

    I realize that this wasn’t addressed to me, but you just might want to rephrase that, Price…..

    Damn, I about tossed my dinner after reading that!

  202. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:14 pm | Permalink

    KansasNative,

    I don’t grovel for “thankyous” at all. I simply think that is all you liberal scum should be giving me instead of crap.

    No, no, no… It is not groveling. It is all that I think you liberals are wroth is a thankyou.

    Lord knows you are not worth much else. You are not worthy to lick the Iraqi Sand off my boots let alone question my service, so I don’t grovel for thanks, I simply see it as the only offering scum like you should be capable of giving.

  203. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:16 pm | Permalink

    “I simply think that is all you liberal scum should be giving me instead of crap.”

    “I would come eat you, you retard.”

    Too funny, Price, way too funny.

  204. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:16 pm | Permalink

    WS Clark,

    I bet that was not the only thing you are tossing over at your place is it?

    You sick pervert.

    Remember? There are no lines Clark.

  205. Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:16 pm | Permalink

    My, my, someone certainly is projecting their fantasies tonight. Can you all feel the Christian love just pouring from these fundies?

  206. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:17 pm | Permalink

    Matbe it is some sick threesome you JR, and KansasNative have going?

    Maybe that is why you 3 are like little butt buddies here.

  207. outlander
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:17 pm | Permalink

    Wonderful. Ain’t hate great KansasNative?

    Hope you guess by name.

  208. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:18 pm | Permalink

    Maggotpunk,

    I am just trying to be a good Christian like you claim to be.

    My brother.

  209. Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:18 pm | Permalink

    Some folks here might want to learn how to read >>>>

    “Kerry did not claim to have been sent on a covert mission to Cambodia on Christmas Eve, 1968. Rather, he believed at the time he had crossed the border while on a patrol near the border, during which the boats were ambushed and later came under friendly fire from South Vietnamese soldiers.[John F. Kerry, the Complete Biography by the Boston Globe Reporters Who Know Him Best, p. 84]

    No official documentation of any accidental or other incursion by either of Kerry’s boats has been discovered. In addition, none of Kerry’s crewmates have confirmed ever being sent to Cambodia. One of Kerry’s crewmen, SBVT member Steven Gardner [60], asserted that it was physically impossible to cross the Cambodian border, as it was blocked and patrolled by PBRs (a type of patrol boat) [61]; however, Kerry’s boat was evidently patrolling with PBRs during the mission in question [62]. Some crewmembers have, moreover, stated that they may at some point have entered Cambodia without knowing it. James Wasser, who was on PCF-44 on that December mission, while saying that he believed they were “very, very close” to Cambodia, did not recall actually crossing over; he also stated that it was very hard to tell their exact position in the border area. Kerry’s own journal entry on this, written the night of the mission, does not specifically say they entered Cambodia. However, it does state that PCF-44 was somewhere “toward Cambodia” to provide cover for two smaller patrol boats, and in sarcasm, that he considered messaging Christmas greetings to his commanders “from the most inland Market Time unit” and that a court martial for the incident “would make sense” [63]. In addition, George Elliott noted in Kerry’s fitness report that he had been in an ambush during the 24 hour Christmas truce, which began on Christmas Eve [64].”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kerry_military_service_controversy

  210. Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:19 pm | Permalink

    Nathan, I can’t say I’ve ever fantasized about homosexual three ways the way you do.

  211. outlander
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:19 pm | Permalink

    MY name.

    Lu

  212. Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:27 pm | Permalink

    WSClark, will you pray with me for Nathan’s soul.

    Dear Jesus, our lost brother Nathan has been imbued with demonic influences. The demon of hate, the demon of lust, the demon of homosexual perversion, the demon of pederasty has entered into Brother Nathan’s soul. We beg you Jesus to allow the Holy Ghost to push aside those demons, cast them back into the lake of Hell where they belong. Free Nathan from his homosexual lusts and desires to inflict violent harm upon others. Demons! I bind you in the name of JESUS! Get out of Brother Nathan’s body and go to that place of darkness you belong.

    In Jesus’ name, Amen.

  213. Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:28 pm | Permalink

    Nathan seems to have a Napoleon complex, I should be saying ‘thank you’ for what? For destroying the soldier’s reputation that would have saved us from this nightmare?

    Please, right now I’d spit on you.

    Yeah, that’s right, I’m going there. Conservatives are traitors to the US. And yes, My dad did serve and I’m affected by it, so you can KMA. I will say what I want about it.

    You got nothing on Kerry who is an honorable man who did the right thing. You just can’t stand that can you. You can’t stand that someone broke rank and tattled.

  214. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:29 pm | Permalink

    “Remember? There are no lines Clark.”

    So what were you planning to do to KN, Price? Just looking for a little shot of protein or were you thinking of a long term relationship?

  215. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:34 pm | Permalink

    “will you pray with me for Nathan’s soul.”

    Amen, Brother Maggot, amen!

    May peace be on his soul!

  216. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:35 pm | Permalink

    Political Mama,

    How could a man who has served in the military have produced something like you?

    There is not way. You have to be a liar or adopted.

    Just come to the next WE Blog meet up if there ever is one and try to spit on me.

    All words on the blog, you coward.

  217. outlander
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:43 pm | Permalink

    My my… I know this will add fuel to the fire, but man, what jackal like behavior from the left here. I can just imagine you all in a pack, diverting attention while another sneaks up behind their opponent in another cowardly attack. Pathetic.

  218. Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:50 pm | Permalink

    My daddy was a Marine. And it surely messed him up no doubt.

    This is how you take care of your own, the way you treated Kerry. My dad supported Kerry.

  219. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:50 pm | Permalink

    “I know this will add fuel to the fire, but man, what jackal like behavior from the left here”

    So, you are okay with Nathan stating that I am a pedophile that also visits prostitutes, right Outlander?

    And you claim to be a Christian.

    Yeah, right.

    What was that Commandment about bearing false witness?

  220. Regular
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:57 pm | Permalink

    I wonder if Thomas Witt is watching and can tell who the REAL homophobes on this blog are. It appears to be KansasNative, Clark and JR from their discussion today.

    And along with a spitter, Political “Rolls of fat on her neck” Mama.

  221. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 8:02 pm | Permalink

    Jeez, McCluer, that has to be one of the dumbest posts of all time – you are officially down to Fleet and Max levels.

    Congratulations!

  222. okobserver
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 8:14 pm | Permalink

    SquarePeg
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 7:18 pm | Permalink
    Some folks here might want to learn how to read >>>>

    “Kerry did not claim to have been sent on a covert mission to Cambodia on Christmas Eve,
    ————–
    Yeah chas and while he was confused about where he was and what he was doing there he was also confused about who sent him there (nixon).

    If you weren’t be pitied you would be funny.

    south park — you are like a cartoon character.

  223. Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 8:20 pm | Permalink

    Rolls of fat on my neck? Really?

    Hahaha.

  224. Regular
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 8:23 pm | Permalink

    They are there Political Mom, it’s from your porcine attitude on life.

    Anyone smell bacon cooking?

  225. okobserver
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 8:23 pm | Permalink

    Pmom I have searched for the settlement fund your daddy is waiting on and couldn’t find anything other than a $197 million dollar fund that finished paying out in 1995. Bush had nothingh to do with it. It came from the makers of agent orange.

    What kind of settlement is Bush holding up?

  226. Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 8:27 pm | Permalink

    Benefits and loss due to the years of being denied. he also lost a son. I don’t know what kind of settlement it is, all I know about it is that they went to court, the govt offered a settlement, and they said the order has to come from the Prez himself.

    Still waiting.

  227. okobserver
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 8:29 pm | Permalink

    This happened back in the 90’s from what I have found. There is a schedule of monthly benefits but they wouldn’t be close to 3 million, a number you mentioned. Still can’t see where Bush could have done anything to help your dad.

  228. Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 8:30 pm | Permalink

    Regular you retarded freakshow, whenever have you seen me. Are you stalking me dipsheet?

  229. KansasNative
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 8:31 pm | Permalink

    If nothing else, this “swift boat” blog shows that the left will not take it anymore.

    The tighty righties have been crying and whimpering all day long.

    I no longer even believe that Nathan was a Marine.

    He’s too much a daddy’s boy to have served.

  230. Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 8:32 pm | Permalink

    He went to St. Louis to court, I had to sign statements, my sister had to sign, they had acquired our medical records as well.

  231. okobserver
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 8:34 pm | Permalink

    Gee pmom do you have rolls around your neck? Regular have you been following her.

    Kansasnative I see reading comprehension and understanding is an attribute lacking on the left side of the political spectrum. The left lost big time today.

    Softball time, gotta go.

  232. KansasNative
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 8:39 pm | Permalink

    Let’s see:

    Nathan fantasizing about little boys, Broadway hookers, and gay three ways

    Reguliar fantasizing about P Mom

    Outlander pretending to be satan

    HLP crying like ababy ’cause no one respects his crazy son

    YEP, the left took a blow today….NOT!

  233. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 8:42 pm | Permalink

    “The left lost big time today.”

    Jeez, Grm, I don’t remember any good Christians from the LEFT accusing anyone of pedophilia today.

    Anyone that makes such a statement must be a big time loser – who could that be?

  234. Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:11 pm | Permalink

    Well if anything this blog proves how seriously p’d off we’re at about this topic and the conservatives think its funny.

    I guess respect for soldiers is just lip service to the neocons.

  235. BlueJay
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:24 pm | Permalink

    I see the little gutless worm Nathan swings at me when I’m not even around. I guess it is better than his bullying linda.

    I’ll not be like the cons attacking John Kerry and his service. I won’t attack anyone here there service.

    But I WILL say that among SOME of the veterans that post here? I find some pretty despicable people.

    We have Hank to dishonor the Navy. Nathan and Paulie disgrace the Marines.

    James Regular MAY be a shattered remnant of a sorrier bit of the Air Force.

    All we need is a con to disgrace the Army, Coast Guard and Merchant Marine.

  236. BlueJay
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:31 pm | Permalink

    And since Nathan is free with the surmising on me?

    I’m gonna use a lot more convincing evidence than HE has to make a few guesses on him.

    He’s like late 20’s early 30’s folks. But he LOOKS a lot older. We never hear him discuss women except in a denigrating way. He’s OBVIOUSLY hung up in some way or other about sexuality. This creeps into his posts.

    He’s a qualified homophobe who hugs only his guns, bible, and money.

    I wonder if he isn’t really LOUDLY trying to tell us something he keeps hidden, maybe even from himself.

  237. jackthehat
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:35 pm | Permalink

    “The Kerry group rebuts several of the accusations and demands apologies”

    Where were they when Kerry returned from Nam and was calling them baby killers? Why didn’t they speak out and defend him when he was swapping spit with Jane Fonda?

    It’s John and Jane that need to get on their knees and kiss every Vet’s backside, then they can start a sincere apology to the American people that they betrayed.

  238. KansasNative
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:42 pm | Permalink

    Bingo…Blue Jay….BINGO.

    Some time ago Nathan was trying to find out if there was a test to determine whether or not someone was gay.

    Hmmmmmm…..

  239. BlueJay
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:51 pm | Permalink

    Ya know?

    I think we may have come a bit TOO far.

    Blaming the vets for Viet Nam, that was wrong.

    But JUST as wrong is this new attitude from the right AND from someone like Nathan who is actually IN the reserve Military.

    Let me show you.

    From Nathan “…so I don’t grovel for thanks, I simply see it as the only offering scum like you should be capable of giving.”

    And just recently, from an unknown nic we get,

    “It’s John and Jane that need to get on their knees and kiss every Vet’s backside”

    Know what is funny here?

    It is CONS that fight against funding for the VA and Veteran’s benefits.

    As a liberal, I think we DO owe our veterans.

    But ENOUGH of this “bow and scrape and kiss their ass” crap. Being a veteran doesn’t make someone some sort of elevated being.

    It means you could take orders and do a job. There are MILLIONS of people who have to do that every single day that have never worn a uniform.

  240. Regular
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:53 pm | Permalink

    #
    KansasNative
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 8:31 pm | Permalink

    If nothing else, this “swift boat” blog shows that the left will not take it anymore.

    The tighty righties have been crying and whimpering all day long.

    I no longer even believe that Nathan was a Marine.

    He’s too much a daddy’s boy to have served.
    ———————-
    The multi-nic KansasNative believes what he writes on this blog is actually important.

    Of course, none of the Liberals would actually have the cajones to say the things they say here to a person’s face.

    That’s a guarantee.

  241. Regular
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:54 pm | Permalink

    #
    Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 8:30 pm | Permalink

    Regular you retarded freakshow, whenever have you seen me. Are you stalking me dipsheet?
    —————————
    How else would one notice the fat rolls?

  242. KansasNative
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:59 pm | Permalink

    Mult-nic?

    Reguliar are you chewing your morphine patches again?

  243. bth
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 9:59 pm | Permalink

    K-Native – you are correct. “swift-boating” is going to cut both ways this year. The funny thing is the nasty anti-McCain stuff I found came from the RIGHT!

    After what the Repukes did to Murtha and McClelland (sp?) this sort of thing has become fair game. Like they say, what goes around comes around. Or – Karma is a bitch.

    The other aspect of this is that McCain has traded so much on his so-called “straight talk”. Well – with Charles Keating and wife 2.0 that will be targeted. This also makes him vulnerable in the so-called “family values” crowd.

  244. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:00 pm | Permalink

    WS Clark,

    Since when did you care about the decorum on the blog?

    Since when did you, Political Mama, BJ, MonkeyButt, Steven, Dougie, or anyone else ever care about decorum?

    I start giving you back a little bit of what you give around here and you all cry like little babies.

    Is that what you did in Detroit Clarkie? Cry when someome said something mean about you?

    The day any of you actually care about decorum around here I will as well.

    You treat me with no respect, I treat you with no respect. This is exactly what you pigs deserve.

  245. Political_mama
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:01 pm | Permalink

    That’s what I thought punk freak. You’ve got nothin.

  246. KansasNative
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:02 pm | Permalink

    Nathan, are you gay?

  247. KansasNative
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:03 pm | Permalink

    Yes…or ….No.

    Simple.

  248. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:03 pm | Permalink

    And here is ebn acting like the left never knew anything about attacking someones service until the swift boat vets came along.

    Did you pay any attention at all during the 2000 election?

    The left had no problem attacking Bush’s service record.

    You are all upset now because you couldn’t to do it as well as the swift boat vets did.

    The one thing you are missing…

    THE SWIFT BOAT VETS WERE VETERANS!

  249. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:04 pm | Permalink

    ebn = ben

  250. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:05 pm | Permalink

    No.

    KansasNative,

    Do you enjoy being BJ’s butt buddy?

    Yes… or…. No.

  251. KansasNative
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:06 pm | Permalink

    Yes or no Nathan?

  252. BlueJay
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:06 pm | Permalink

    I’m not crying about anything Nathan.

    I also don’t take shots on you when you are not around.

    I have ALSO asked other posters to avoid suggesting that you suffer from PTSD. (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder).

    But based on your posts of the last several months and in particular, today? I really think you should consider seeking some sort of counseling.

    I have been trading shots with you for 3 years Nathan. But since you returned from Iraq, there is a new cruel crude nastiness to you.

  253. KansasNative
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:09 pm | Permalink

    I’m not convinced Nathan…you continue to have homosexual fantasies.

    I’m nobody’s “butt buddie”.

  254. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:11 pm | Permalink

    BJ,

    Since I have returned from Iraq, you have made accusations towards my father and I which are rude and mean.

    I have no respect for you little man.

    When you continue to say the retarded things about my family and I of course I am going to treat you poorly you simple minded nitwit.

    You liberal goons don’t like things around here? Perhaps you should start practicing what you preach.

  255. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:12 pm | Permalink

    “You treat me with no respect, I treat you with no respect.”

    Fair enough, cherry boy.

    By the way, why do YOU know so much about South Broadway?

    Spend much time and money down there?

    I can say this much – I have never had to pay for it – apparently you have.

  256. Regular
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:13 pm | Permalink

    KansasNative
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:09 pm | Permalink

    I’m not convinced Nathan…you continue to have homosexual fantasies.
    ——————————-
    Apparently libs like KansasNative thinks it’s okay to harass someone about their sexual preference.

    Look who is the bigot here, a Lib.

  257. Regular
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:15 pm | Permalink

    #
    BlueJay
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:06 pm | Permalink

    I have been trading shots with you for 3 years Nathan. But since you returned from Iraq, there is a new cruel crude nastiness to you.
    —————————————–
    You shouldn’t talk about being cruel J. Ryan Remil aka JR aka Bluejay.

  258. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:19 pm | Permalink

    “Apparently libs like KansasNative thinks it’s okay to harass someone about their sexual preference.”

    So apparently you feel that Nathan Price is homosexual, McCluer.

    So why don’t you tell him that it is okay to come out of the closet if you are convinced that he is gay?

  259. BlueJay
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:20 pm | Permalink

    I have no respect for you or your father either there Nathan.

    But I don’t have to stoop to the level that you do here.

    I am being entirely honest here. I always try to be.

    You are fading into irrational Nathan. And as much as I REALLY want to take advantage of that?

    I’m not going to.

    But you have made your bed here with the other posters. Now you will have to sleep in it. I’ll not attempt to defend you further.

  260. Regular
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:21 pm | Permalink

    #
    WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:19 pm | Permalink

    “Apparently libs like KansasNative thinks it’s okay to harass someone about their sexual preference.”

    So apparently you feel that Nathan Price is homosexual, McCluer.

    So why don’t you tell him that it is okay to come out of the closet if you are convinced that he is gay?
    ——————————–
    No, you failed to read.

    I said harassed because of their sexual preference. Didn’t say which way it was, although Nathan has indicated already he was heterosexual.

  261. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:25 pm | Permalink

    “although Nathan has indicated already he was heterosexual.”

    No, he hasn’t.

  262. Regular
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:29 pm | Permalink

    Sure he did. He answered right here.

    #
    Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:05 pm | Permalink

    No.

    KansasNative,

    Do you enjoy being BJ’s butt buddy?

    Yes… or…. No.

  263. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:31 pm | Permalink

    “Sure he did. He answered right here.”

    That could only mean that he is asexual, not heterosexual, or that he is bisexual.

  264. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:35 pm | Permalink

    BJ,

    It is not called “honesty” when you constantly tell my father he is a kept man.

    It is not called “honesty” when you make up things about my father on this blog.

    You choose to be a mean little person.

    If you want some decorum around here, just let me know.

    I have asked several times what the line is here and none of you liberals can tell me. Yet everyday you have no problem talking about my family, making rude and vulgar comments about me and others, and when we do it to you all of a sudden you care?

    Yeah right.

  265. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:36 pm | Permalink

    WS Clark,

    Why are you so worried about getting AIDS?

    You might not be paying for sex, but then again, what does that say about these women who are giving it to you?

    No wonder why you test yourself for AIDS.

  266. Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:39 pm | Permalink

    Must be that old reading comprehension problem again LOL —–

    “In addition, George Elliott noted in Kerry’s fitness report that he had been in an ambush during the 24 hour Christmas truce, which began on Christmas Eve [64].”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kerry_military_service_controversy

  267. StevenEDavis
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:39 pm | Permalink

    Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:00 pm | Permalink

    Decorum and civility is what is owed to the Prices. Their reciprocal obligations – don’t really exist. Read the posts going back to the very beginning of this blog. This essential point is undeniable…

  268. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:40 pm | Permalink

    PoliticalMama,

    I believe you when you say your father is messed up by agent orange.

    Only then would a daughter of a Marine act like a pig and coward as you do here. A Marine with his wits about him would never have raised a daughter like you. I Just don’t believe it.

  269. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:41 pm | Permalink

    “Why are you so worried about getting AIDS?”

    I am not worried in the least about getting HIV/AIDS but I owe it to my female partners to know that I am free and clear before we have sex.

    I am not worried, but I am responsible.

    And, contrary to your self-righteous opinions, not everyone that contracts HIV/AIDS is promiscuous, cherry boy.

  270. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:42 pm | Permalink

    Steven,

    It is always nice to have a regular poster like you to constantly demonstrate what a Hypocrite in action looks like.

  271. Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:43 pm | Permalink

    Damn, I must have missed something. When did they put a Do-it-yourself AIDS test kit on the market? Who makes it?

  272. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:44 pm | Permalink

    Steven,

    Did you and BJ get giddy when you pulled one over on Regular and set him up like you did?

    What bravery from you two! Cheers!

    Setting up a drive by for BJ to get a look at Regular? Brilliant.

  273. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:46 pm | Permalink

    WS Clark,

    If you are not worried about getting AIDS… then why would you test yourself?

    If you are nor worried about getting it, then why would you worry about having it and giving it to someone else?

  274. BlueJay
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:49 pm | Permalink

    This is an opinion blog Nathan.

    It strayed a WAY long time ago into personal opinions of the posters on each other.

    As I recall, your father was the first to “go there” when he accused me of being a casual user of illegal drugs. I could go look for it?

    But congrats (I guess) You have way outdone your old man in “going there”.

    “It is not called “honesty” when you constantly tell my father he is a kept man.

    “It is not called “honesty” when you make up things about my father on this blog.”

    Obviously, this makes your father and you defensive. Well, the sting in any rebuke is the truth?

    Your father BRAGS on wealth that he has from

    1) His pension.
    2) His wife.

    Like I say Nathan, I have very little remaining respect for you or your family. But I sat on what I knew for a very long time before I “went there”. Once I knew what your Dad and you were and where it was you were coming from?

    Well, it was like you became an object of pity for me. I could hate you AND understand you.

    If your dad wants to wave his money for all to see, he may be expected to be called on it.

  275. Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:53 pm | Permalink

    BJ,

    Like I said BJ. You have no problem dishing it out. Just don’t cry when you get it in return.

  276. WSClark
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:53 pm | Permalink

    “If you are not worried about getting AIDS… then why would you test yourself?”

    One, I don’t test myself – I have a blood test yearly as part of a physical, and I specifically ask to be tested for HIV/AIDS.

    “If you are nor worried about getting it, then why would you worry about having it and giving it to someone else?”

    I don’t worry about having head on collisions while I am driving, but I still wear a seatbelt.

    I have been married twice, have two near misses and XX female partners in my life – it is just being responsible to have a regular test.

    Got a problem with that, Mister Personal Responsibility?

  277. Regular
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:53 pm | Permalink

    Get a clue Blue Jay Remil, Hank Price earned his Navy pension and married his wife. Hank also works for a living as well as keeping up a small farm.

    He never bragged about his pension anywhere I read.

    Just making crap up as usual James Ryan Remil aka JR aka Bluejay.

  278. BlueJay
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:58 pm | Permalink

    Dish away Nathan.

    I’ve not a thing in the world to lose.

    Actually, I sort of like the invitation to take off the gloves. You give me permission to descend to your level.

    I’ll take it under advisement.

  279. BlueJay
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:05 pm | Permalink

    Heh HEH!

    If James (”Regular”,”Kansas”,”Republican”,Republikhan”,”Eier” “JM” etc, etc) is the best you got for backup?

    You ARE up a tree.

  280. BlueJay
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:18 pm | Permalink

    “Just come to the next WE Blog meet up if there ever is one and try to spit on me.”

    Well there won’t be any more Eagle organized meetups Nathan. You and the insane James McCluer (Regular) have seen to that.

    But there will still be meet ups. One is being organized now. One happened the other day.

    You Nathan, will not get a chance to disrupt another meetup.

  281. StevenEDavis
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:22 pm | Permalink

    Nathaniel
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 10:44 pm | Permalink
    Steven,

    Did you and BJ get giddy when you pulled one over on Regular and set him up like you did?

    What bravery from you two! Cheers!
    **********

    That is kind of funny Nathan. I have never in my life received more bullshit from Assholes like you for buying another person lunch.

    I have explained my reasons repeatedly as to why I did this. I will not again.

    Please graduate from college and quit living off of your stepmother, asshole…

    But you may aspire to be like your very sad jerk father. Very Sad… is all I have to say.

  282. killerpizza
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:25 pm | Permalink

    Regular
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 6:11 am | Permalink
    Kerry was ‘agin’ his Vietnam service before he was ‘fer’ it again in 2004.

    (chortles)

    ur kinda gay huh

  283. BlueJay
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:31 pm | Permalink

    Yeah Nathan.

    Quit giving Steven grief for me being wary…

    because of you.

    A lunch was arranged between Steven, the many nic’d poster formerly known as “JM”, and myself.

    You invited yourself.

    Given your capacity for threatening to bring firearms to social gatherings for purpose of intimidation, I chose not to attend.

    But I did want to and DID get a look at your pal “Regular”. This was on my own initiative.

    Where were you to get “Regular’s” back there Nathan?

    I saw a one on one meeting and drove away.

    You didn’t even show.

  284. StevenEDavis
    Posted June 25, 2008 at 11:40 pm | Permalink

    “I saw a one on one meeting and drove away.

    “You didn’t even show.”

    This is the troubling part, should we expect the battle hardened Marine, or the delicate flower whose feelings are easily bruised???

    It is just difficult to know…

  285. Nathaniel
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 12:02 am | Permalink

    Steven,

    Perhaps if you didn’t lie to people about that lunch you wouldn’t get so much crap.

    So tell us again…

    If you told BJ to stay away, like BJ claims, why did you tell Regular you didn’t know if BJ would show up?

    Regular clearly indicates that you were less than honest with him.

    Why?

    You never explained yourself. You refused to answer and left the blog in an indignant tantrum wondering why we would dare ask.

    Feeling a bit guilty?

    Seems like Regular was the better man because he accepted your invitation in the first place.

    Now BJ uses his little drive buy and you use your meeting to make fun of him for his appearence.

    What big brave men you and your little pal BJ are!

  286. Nathaniel
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 12:09 am | Permalink

    BJ,

    The only meetup which was disrupted was the one your butt buddy Clarkie disrupted by crying for 3 days straight about how I was “threatening” him.

    Now the big girly man Clarkie hides behind his Granddaughter as an excuse.

    For years he said he would never meet me.

    Now all of a sudden he wants to have me over for Ribs so his cowardly stepson can have his buddies with him to tell me what they think.

  287. okobserver
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 12:09 am | Permalink

    Steven I just can’t imagine that I could have been so wrong about a person as I was about you and Ben. Civilized discourse is impossible on this blog. I feel dirty just signing in lately. I revealed my true identity last night because I am not a deceptive person by nature. Todays discussion reached a new low even for the ususals.

    Not one person should be proud of what happened here today but you don’t get off scott free with the deception you pulled on Regular. BJ, Jr or whoever he is deserves no respect. He and WS threathened me months ago to the point that I didn’t post for weeks and made sure after that to reveal no personal info. And you encouraged him to sneak around like a stalker to spy on regular.

    We all share the blame for the direction the blog has taken but today’s blame goes to the left starting with Pmom’s attack on Nathan. Don’t take the high road with the right anymore. You forfeited that right.

    And for heavens sake tell your poor addled friend Chas to drop the Square peg charade. He is truly an idiot.

  288. Posted June 26, 2008 at 12:20 am | Permalink

    YOU are the one who is the true idiot, you Blog Wench! Go on back to your rat’s nest, before the others miss you.

  289. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 12:26 am | Permalink

    Nathaniel,

    Your father seems to believe that the late George Carlin was a credible climate scientist. Do you think the same about the late Carlin?

    Dennis Avery, an agricultural economist, falsely claimed that climate scientists (who AGREED with AGW) disagreed with AGW.

    Nathaniel, would you say that Avery is a more, or less credible climate science source than the late Carlin?

  290. Posted June 26, 2008 at 12:27 am | Permalink

    By the way, bitch, you chose to disregard what I posted last night, where I gave you my physical description, and told you to ask those who claim to know Chas what he looks like. But you wont do it, because you are afraid of learning the truth.

  291. Nathaniel
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 12:28 am | Permalink

    Cosmos,

    I’m sorry to tell you.

    By your standards, I am going to be unable to have any conversation with you on AGW until you show me your credentials.

  292. Nathaniel
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 12:32 am | Permalink

    As I said before…

    What does it matter if Chas and Squarepeg really are two different people?

    They post alike, swear alike, have the same temper tantrum styles, post alike, back each other up…

    They might as well be the same poster even if they are not.

    Who cares?

    Both are idiots.

  293. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 12:34 am | Permalink

    Poor little Nathaniel…

    He can’t express his opinions, unless he knows the “credentials” of the person asking him simple, obvious questions.

  294. Posted June 26, 2008 at 12:35 am | Permalink

    Like you and your father, and Max, and okobserver?

    Yep, keep it up, little runt. Someday, some where, you will get yours. But I will no doubt not be present to it happen. Damn!

  295. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 12:35 am | Permalink

    SquarePeg,

    IIRC, okobserver (ksgrm) is in the home construction business.

    If so, she must must be a genius(sarcasm), because she believes that an 80-year old mansion can get a gold LEED award, just by changing light bulbs, and adding some PV panels.

  296. Nathaniel
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 12:36 am | Permalink

    Cosmos,

    Those “simple” and “obvious” questions dont mean anything unless they are coming from someone with credentials.

    How many peer reviewed papers have you published on AGW?

  297. Nathaniel
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 12:39 am | Permalink

    If what you AGW chicken littles said 6 months ago, that if we don’t act now it will be too late, was true, then what is the point?

    We didn’t act 6 months ago. It is too late.

    Why bother now?

  298. Posted June 26, 2008 at 12:44 am | Permalink

    TOPEKA, Kan. – A foundation that has sued the military alleging widespread violations of religious freedom is asking the Pentagon to block a Christian cable TV broadcast featuring officers in uniform.

    The Military Religious Freedom Foundation has raised objections to 20 minutes of the two-hour broadcast of “Carman’s Red, White and Blue Spectacular,” saying the program may violate a prohibition against uniformed officers endorsing a particular religion.

    Mikey Weinstein, president of the foundation, said the military’s involvement in the program “maliciously defiles and lays waste” to regulations. He wrote Secretary of Defense Robert Gates on Monday seeking a full investigation.

    The program is scheduled to air July 4 and 5 on the Trinity Broadcasting Network. It previously produced in 2003 and re-aired in 2005.

    A spokeswoman for Gates said Wednesday that the letter hadn’t yet been received.

    “When it is, we will forward it to the appropriate command for review,” spokeswoman Eileen Lainez said.

    Included in the program is a segment where Lt. Gen. Robert L. Van Antwerp appears in uniform and is introduced as the then-president of the Officers Christian Fellowship. The interview was filmed at Fort Leonard Wood, Mo., where he was commander of the U.S. Army Maneuver Support Center.

    In his letter, Weinstein also claims that footage also was shot of soldiers training at Fort Leonard Wood with the knowledge and permission of Van Antwerp.

    Weinstein said the video is a tacit endorsement the U.S. military of Christianity and the Christian singer and evangelist Carman. He also said it’s fodder for those in Iraq and Afghanistan who perceive U.S. military action as part of crusade to spread Christianity and Western ideologies. Several terrorist groups already post video of statements made by U.S. officials and clergy as part of their recruitment efforts, he added.

    “This represents a quintessential national security threat for those in harm’s way,” Weinstein said.

    Trinity Broadcasting Network was founded by Paul and Jan Crouch. It bills itself as the world’s largest religious broadcaster.

    A woman answering the phones at Trinity’s offices in Santa Ana, Calif., said she was unaware of any objections to Carman’s programs since it first aired or of any requests that it be pulled. She declined to comment further.

    Israel Berry, a spokesman for Carman, said he also was unaware of any concerns. He said the ministry’s legal department would be willing to review those raised by the foundation.

    The foundation previously has sued Gates in Kansas City, Kan., federal court. Government attorneys are expected to file a response to the lawsuit by July 8.

    To date, Gates and others have refused to comment about the litigation, only to say that religious discrimination is not tolerated in the military. Lainez said members of the military can file complaints with their chain of command, inspector general or the Defense Department’s Equal Employment Opportunity Office to file formal complaints.

    She said that over a three-year period, the Equal Employment Opportunity Office received fewer than 50 complaints based on religious discrimination among all military service branches.

    After a complaint from the foundation last year, a report from the Defense Department’s Inspector General recommended that Brig. Gen. Robert L. Caslen and Brig. Gen. Vincent K. Brooks be disciplined for wearing their uniforms in a video for the evangelical group Christian Embassy, which holds prayer meetings regularly at the Pentagon. Both men received letters of concern, which were placed in their personnel files.

    Caslen, president of the Officers Christian Fellowship, is commandant of cadets at West Point. He has been nominated for a second-star and to lead the 25th Infantry Division, in Hawaii. The fellowship’s mission statement seeks “Christian officers exercising biblical leadership to raise up a godly military.”

    http://www.kansas.com/news/updates/story/444957.html

  299. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 12:45 am | Permalink

    Nathaniel…

    How many peer reviewed papers did the late George Carlin publish on AGW?
    Your father copy/pasted his column on ‘Open’.

    How many peer reviewed papers has Avery, the agricultural economist, published on AGW?
    Nathaniel copy/pasted Avery’s columns as proof that AGW isn’t happening

  300. Nathaniel
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 12:46 am | Permalink

    Chas,

    Don’t you, as an alleged Christian Minister, want more of our military to be Christians?

  301. Nathaniel
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 12:47 am | Permalink

    I’m sorry cosmos, but until you can show me some credentials, your posts about AGW are meaningless.

  302. Posted June 26, 2008 at 12:54 am | Permalink

    Meltdown in 4, 3, 2, 1………

  303. Posted June 26, 2008 at 12:55 am | Permalink

    Good night; Good luck; and God Bless —
    Whatever you conceive God to be!!

    Blessings ALL!!

    Blessings on the great City of Wichita!!

  304. Posted June 26, 2008 at 12:59 am | Permalink

    ALSO:

    Blessings on the endeavors of Gay Pride Week!

  305. BlueJay
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 1:03 am | Permalink

    “BJ, Jr or whoever he is deserves no respect. He and WS threathened me months ago ”

    That’s a lie there ksgrm.

    I only asked you to post the name of the business where you abuse your employees so that I could boycott it.

    And then there is Nathan.

    Well, he has made his own rep. here.

    I’ve met him.And on several occasions.

    I found him dull and little more than a reflection of his own colorless, bigoted, stuck up father and step mother.

  306. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 1:04 am | Permalink

    I’m sorry Nathaniel, but until you can show me some rational, informed, intelligent, cognitive thoughts… your posts are meaningless.

    Your past posts are meaningless, and your future posts will probably continue to be meaningless.

  307. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 1:12 am | Permalink

    Nathaniel,

    If someone asked you your opinion on a gun issue, would you refuse to answer until they posted their “credentials” proving that they were a gun expert?

  308. Nathaniel
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 1:15 am | Permalink

    Cosmos,

    Why would you in one post dismiss my posts as meaningless and then in the very next ask me a question?

    Ever heard of the word futile?

  309. Nathaniel
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 1:16 am | Permalink

    BJ,

    Perhaps you are the reason Clarkie worries about AIDS so much?

  310. Nathaniel
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 1:23 am | Permalink

    BJ,

    What exactly is it you do in the recycling business?

    Is that code for gathering cans from the dumpsters?

  311. Posted June 26, 2008 at 1:34 am | Permalink

    If I understood this thing correctly, Steven had no idea that BlueJay planned on doing a drive-by while he and James had lunch. Jay, tell me if I am wrong on that.

  312. Posted June 26, 2008 at 1:38 am | Permalink

    That is not the issue of the above posted article, Nathan. Therefore, your question is not relevant to this matter.

  313. Nathaniel
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 1:40 am | Permalink

    Chas,

    The article has nothing to do with the thread either. Yet you still posted it.

    Why? What was your point?

  314. Posted June 26, 2008 at 1:42 am | Permalink

    Nathan, in the four Gospels, can you find even one time when Jesus tried to “convert” anybody?

    Can you find any place where Paul tried to “convert” anybody?

    What is your obsession with “conversion”??

  315. Posted June 26, 2008 at 1:44 am | Permalink

    The article is of interest to military issues. This thread is related to military issues. Try again??

  316. BlueJay
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 1:45 am | Permalink

    And I have to go to sleep.

    Nathan? You are better off than me. Your family has more money than me.

    Still? I pity you.

  317. Nathaniel
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 1:53 am | Permalink

    Chas,

    I’m sorry. Any obsession that I may or may not have with conversion has nothing to do with the topic here.

    I will not answer your question.

  318. Posted June 26, 2008 at 1:55 am | Permalink

    Nathan proves beyond a doubt that he knows Nothing of Blue Jay’s life. NOTHING!! BOGUS… and, LIES too! Shame, shame, Nathan!! Shame!

  319. Posted June 26, 2008 at 1:56 am | Permalink

    Well, hell’s bells, Nathan, YOU brought up the conversion yourself!! Nitwit!!

  320. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 1:57 am | Permalink

    Nathaniel posted June 26, 2008 at 1:15 am

    Why would you in one post dismiss my posts as meaningless and then in the very next ask me a question?
    ————–

    Just giving an example that proved my point, in my first post.

    That seems to be too complicated for Nathaniel to understand…

  321. Posted June 26, 2008 at 1:58 am | Permalink

    May the night be a safe one,
    And may the morning bring new life!

    So mote it be!

  322. Posted June 26, 2008 at 1:59 am | Permalink

    From ghosties, and ghoulies, and long leggedity beasties, and things that go bump in the night, dear Lord, deliver us! So mote it be!

  323. Posted June 26, 2008 at 2:03 am | Permalink

    May the night be a safe one,
    And may the morning bring new life!

    So mote it be!

  324. Nathaniel
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 2:17 am | Permalink

    BJ,

    Where is mommy for your son? I notice that you didn’t mention her.

    Where did she go?

    Why does your son owe her nothing?

    And I am sure that with your parentling skills, as soon as your son is old enough to figure out what a poor little man his father is, of course he will not want to answer to you or show you any respect.

    But, at least you are not expecting it.

    Kudos to you on that one.

  325. Regular
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 2:47 am | Permalink

    Ah, I see that duh Libs are talking about me even though I’m not online until now. They just can’t get enough of me.

    Well, what can I say?

    DANCE PUPPETS DANCE!

    (chortles)

  326. Nathaniel
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 2:53 am | Permalink

    I think I’ll get myself a bowl of ice cream now.

  327. Nathaniel
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 3:02 am | Permalink

    Well, I think I am going to help save the world tonight cosmos.

    I’m headed to bed so that I will not attract you to waste your time debating with us meaningless posters about AGW when the debate is over.

    Now you can go use this time to actually do something to save the world.

    You better get at it too, they said 6 months ago that if we didn’t act now it would be too late.

    You are behind!

    Never say that I didn’t do my part to help stop AGW!

  328. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 3:07 am | Permalink

    Nathaniel Price,

    If the “debate is over”, WHY are you, your father, Max, ‘Regular’, Sol, econ101, ksgrm, Sen. Inhofe, the agricultural economist Dennis Avery, and many, many other zero credibilty people wasting TIME denying AGW?

  329. Regular
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 3:08 am | Permalink

    What you are understanding Nathan is the just a tip of the evil of the world.

    These Lib ‘people’ have embraced it, lived it and indeed love their style of living.

    They all know that the only way to salvation is through Jesus Christ, so they resist it, hoping tomorrow will never come.

    Galatians 5:22-23

    22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith.

  330. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 3:52 am | Permalink

    Multi-nic’d ‘Regular’ posted,

    Oh, that’s okay cosmos. The beard can be shaven and the spirit cleansed.

    Those who saw me were having trouble seeing me, because I was standing on the shoulders of Christ.
    ————

    But you, multi-nic’d ‘Regular’, have posted multiple lies on the We Blog about climate science, the failure of the NO levees, my posts, etc…

    For example, you, multi-nic’d ‘Regular’, have ZERO science to support your false claims about global CO2 being above 400 ppm in the 1940’s.

    ‘Regular’ cannot “shave” his false claims, and lies away.

    And Christ is very unlikely to consider serial liars like ‘Regular’ “righteous”.

  331. Monkeyhawk
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 4:39 am | Permalink

    “cosmos_originally” says –

    “Christ is very unlikely to consider serial liars like ‘Regular’ “righteous”.”

    Maybe.

    But Jesus was an ol’ softie, so don’t rule it out.

    From what I’ve observed from the self-defined “Christians” and the Christ himself, He’d probably end up loving His enemies and would realize His worst enemies are those who claim to be “Christians.”

  332. Jed
    Posted June 26, 2008 at 6:55 pm | Permalink

    Cos,
    “And Christ is very unlikely to consider serial liars like ‘Regular’ “righteous”.”

    According to longstanding christian doctrine, a sin is not sin if it is done for the greater glory of god.

9 Trackbacks

  1. By Allan on July 9, 2008 at 7:10 pm

    Allan…

    I just wanted to say that the quality of your Free Mp3 Download is exceptional. On top of all that it really complements the content that is provided by your site….

  2. By Body Cleansing Treatments Uk on July 11, 2008 at 7:20 am

    Body Cleansing Treatments Uk…

    I have to say, that I could not agree with you in 100%, but it’s just my opinion, which could be wrong….

  3. By home loan st louis on July 11, 2008 at 11:57 pm

    home loan st louis…

    It sounds interesting but I am not sure that I agree with you completely….

  4. By Weather Forecast Air Supply Cloud on July 13, 2008 at 2:54 pm

    Weather Forecast Air Supply Cloud…

    I didn’t agree with you first, but last paragraph makes sense for me…

  5. By Nadia on July 14, 2008 at 12:15 pm

    Nadia…

    I just wanted to tell you that your site is really awesome and is of a fantastic quality. The content is great and I will be returning….

  6. By Diabetes on July 15, 2008 at 7:43 pm

    Diabetes…

    nice post about this…..

  7. By Parkinson's on July 15, 2008 at 7:43 pm

    Parkinson’s…

    nice post about this…..

  8. By forexG on July 16, 2008 at 4:56 am

    forexG…

    this is comprehensive, but this article seems to be too short and i’m sure that you can explain a little more. thanks…

  9. By Kds Bbs Pics Childporn Underage Nudist on July 16, 2008 at 5:25 pm

    Kds Bbs Pics Childporn Underage Nudist…

    I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view…