<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open thread 6/8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:30:46 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Apophis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-365353</link>
		<dc:creator>Apophis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 23:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-365353</guid>
		<description>.......you&#039;d better copy/paste this into your WORD file to complete that dossier!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;&#8230;.you&#8217;d better copy/paste this into your WORD file to complete that dossier!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boxlock</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-365350</link>
		<dc:creator>Boxlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 23:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-365350</guid>
		<description>Ever notice, CF2K NEVER SMILES.
He&#039;s always on a rag about something.
Wonder why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever notice, CF2K NEVER SMILES.<br />
He&#8217;s always on a rag about something.<br />
Wonder why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monkeyhawk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364994</link>
		<dc:creator>Monkeyhawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364994</guid>
		<description>First &quot;WSClark&quot; says --

&lt;i&gt;&quot;...it’s not THAT bad considering that it didn’t even exist until tomorrow.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Then &quot;cosmos_originally&quot; comes up with --

&lt;i&gt;&quot;You should have been here yesterday, when tomorrow was today.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

And I&#039;m stuck here in the middle asking --

&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;WHERE AM I NOW THAT I NEEDED ME?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First &#8220;WSClark&#8221; says &#8211;</p>
<p><i>&#8220;&#8230;it’s not THAT bad considering that it didn’t even exist until tomorrow.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Then &#8220;cosmos_originally&#8221; comes up with &#8211;</p>
<p><i>&#8220;You should have been here yesterday, when tomorrow was today.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>And I&#8217;m stuck here in the middle asking &#8211;</p>
<p><b><i>WHERE AM I NOW THAT I NEEDED ME?!</i></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmos_originally</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364988</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmos_originally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364988</guid>
		<description>You should have been here yesterday, when tomorrow was today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should have been here yesterday, when tomorrow was today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364984</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 00:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364984</guid>
		<description>Well, Chas, it&#039;s not THAT bad considering that it didn&#039;t even exist until tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Chas, it&#8217;s not THAT bad considering that it didn&#8217;t even exist until tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364974</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 23:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364974</guid>
		<description>Almost  aa  totally  wasted  Thread  today!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost  aa  totally  wasted  Thread  today!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364969</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 23:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364969</guid>
		<description>&quot;So it is true that the muppet poster CF2K supports Palestinian terrorists.&quot;

Grow up, McCluer, or at least PRETEND to grow up.

That was a stupid comment, but what else would we expect from the likes of you.

Sad. Stupid and sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So it is true that the muppet poster CF2K supports Palestinian terrorists.&#8221;</p>
<p>Grow up, McCluer, or at least PRETEND to grow up.</p>
<p>That was a stupid comment, but what else would we expect from the likes of you.</p>
<p>Sad. Stupid and sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF2K</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364968</link>
		<dc:creator>CF2K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 23:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364968</guid>
		<description>Monkeyhawk,

&quot;Additionally, a national newspaper in Germany yesterday published on its front page a picture of the White House with the headline: “Uncle Barack’s Cabin?”

OY.  Those Germans work SO hard at rehabilitating their image, and then something like THAT shows up.  The mind reels...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monkeyhawk,</p>
<p>&#8220;Additionally, a national newspaper in Germany yesterday published on its front page a picture of the White House with the headline: “Uncle Barack’s Cabin?”</p>
<p>OY.  Those Germans work SO hard at rehabilitating their image, and then something like THAT shows up.  The mind reels&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regular</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364967</link>
		<dc:creator>Regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 23:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364967</guid>
		<description>So it is true that the muppet poster CF2K supports Palestinian terrorists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it is true that the muppet poster CF2K supports Palestinian terrorists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF2K</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364965</link>
		<dc:creator>CF2K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 23:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364965</guid>
		<description>Nathaniel,

I don&#039;t watch South Park because I don&#039;t find it amusing.  As in, &quot;not funny&quot;--lame, obvious, and smug.  SO smug, in fact.  I though the first movie was pretty funny, but &quot;Team America&quot; gave up on the humor in favor of making a heavy handed ideological point.  I grant that the puppet sex WAS pretty funny.

I think WS Clark nailed the point when he said this:

&quot;Ah, when subjected to anti-semitism, the burden is on the individual that made the offensive remarks - the victim is not obliged to be polite, nor would anyone subject to racial or ethnic bigotry.&quot;

It&#039;s real simple, Nathan: if you don&#039;t want to be called an anti-Semite, don&#039;t play anti-Semitic stereotypes for laughs.  Period.  Because when you do, you&#039;re laughing at the same racist shit that White Power assholes like Ian Santiago laugh at.  When you laugh at those stereotypes, Nathan, you join THEIR linguistic community.  I suspect that really isn&#039;t where you, or your father, want to be.  But that&#039;s where you put yourselves when you snicker about how &quot;Jews are cheap.&quot;

As for your imputation that I&#039;m just some sort of concern troll who wasn&#039;t REALLY offended, but just wanted to make a point, well, Nathan, really, what the f*ck do you know? 

One of the things about being in MY skin, which is to say, that of being a practicing Christian with a Jewish heritage and a WASP last name, is that people feel comfortable using anti-Semitic stereotypes and slurs because they think you&#039;re not Jewish.  And they get REAL quiet when you tell them you are.  I&#039;m an adult with a big mouth who isn&#039;t afraid of a fight; obviously.  But in every case, I ALWAYS would prefer that the person had not said what he or she said.  It&#039;s just no fun, and is generally a losing proposition, to have to call someone out--as the current exchange makes abundantly clear.

Finally, you want to know what REALLY offends me, Nathan? Well, I&#039;ll tell you: it&#039;s the way the Wingnuts on this blog throw the &quot;anti-Semitic&quot; accusation at anyone who challenges the right of the Israeli state to do whatever it wants, whenever it wants, to whomever it wants.  I&#039;m sick of Wingnuts using such an extremely loaded term as a cheap argument-stopper, without any knowledge WHATEVER of its historical backstory.

I didn&#039;t embark on calling your father out lightly.  I hope he changes how he uses language.  But if he isn&#039;t afraid of being seen as anti-Semitic for continuing to employ anti-Semitic stereotypes, then I&#039;m not afraid to call him out for doing so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathaniel,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t watch South Park because I don&#8217;t find it amusing.  As in, &#8220;not funny&#8221;&#8211;lame, obvious, and smug.  SO smug, in fact.  I though the first movie was pretty funny, but &#8220;Team America&#8221; gave up on the humor in favor of making a heavy handed ideological point.  I grant that the puppet sex WAS pretty funny.</p>
<p>I think WS Clark nailed the point when he said this:</p>
<p>&#8220;Ah, when subjected to anti-semitism, the burden is on the individual that made the offensive remarks &#8211; the victim is not obliged to be polite, nor would anyone subject to racial or ethnic bigotry.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s real simple, Nathan: if you don&#8217;t want to be called an anti-Semite, don&#8217;t play anti-Semitic stereotypes for laughs.  Period.  Because when you do, you&#8217;re laughing at the same racist shit that White Power assholes like Ian Santiago laugh at.  When you laugh at those stereotypes, Nathan, you join THEIR linguistic community.  I suspect that really isn&#8217;t where you, or your father, want to be.  But that&#8217;s where you put yourselves when you snicker about how &#8220;Jews are cheap.&#8221;</p>
<p>As for your imputation that I&#8217;m just some sort of concern troll who wasn&#8217;t REALLY offended, but just wanted to make a point, well, Nathan, really, what the f*ck do you know? </p>
<p>One of the things about being in MY skin, which is to say, that of being a practicing Christian with a Jewish heritage and a WASP last name, is that people feel comfortable using anti-Semitic stereotypes and slurs because they think you&#8217;re not Jewish.  And they get REAL quiet when you tell them you are.  I&#8217;m an adult with a big mouth who isn&#8217;t afraid of a fight; obviously.  But in every case, I ALWAYS would prefer that the person had not said what he or she said.  It&#8217;s just no fun, and is generally a losing proposition, to have to call someone out&#8211;as the current exchange makes abundantly clear.</p>
<p>Finally, you want to know what REALLY offends me, Nathan? Well, I&#8217;ll tell you: it&#8217;s the way the Wingnuts on this blog throw the &#8220;anti-Semitic&#8221; accusation at anyone who challenges the right of the Israeli state to do whatever it wants, whenever it wants, to whomever it wants.  I&#8217;m sick of Wingnuts using such an extremely loaded term as a cheap argument-stopper, without any knowledge WHATEVER of its historical backstory.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t embark on calling your father out lightly.  I hope he changes how he uses language.  But if he isn&#8217;t afraid of being seen as anti-Semitic for continuing to employ anti-Semitic stereotypes, then I&#8217;m not afraid to call him out for doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monkeyhawk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364935</link>
		<dc:creator>Monkeyhawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364935</guid>
		<description>&quot;Nathaniel&quot; asks --

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Are you trying to say that if I was to make racist jokes and bigoted comments towards every group on the blog that would make it ok?

As long as I don’t leave anyone out?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Hell.  Maybe.

It works for me, mostly.

Poor ol&#039; &quot;Fleettwood&quot; about stroked out when I posted in favor of capital punishment (with minor reforms) yesterday.  He couldn&#039;t cope.

I guess the only reason &quot;Boxlock&quot; isn&#039;t posting to this forum today is his promise to bone-dig my previous posts that he thinks will prove I am &quot;the most vulgar and perverted&quot; participant in this forum.  I guess that task is taking more work than he anticipated.

I&#039;ve pissed off liberals and Cons on this forum but stand by my opinions with the courage of my convictions.

I was a more-or-less regular listener of Rush Limbaugh for the better part of a decade, just to hear if he&#039;d actually &lt;i&gt;surprise&lt;/i&gt; me with some genuine conservative opinion that didn&#039;t parrot Republic Party cant.

Never happened.

I can spin the radio dial and channel surf Faux Noise Channel in a half-hour and pretty much pick up all the GOP talking points that show up from Cons on this forum.

Surprise me, &quot;Nathaniel.&quot;  Take a step out from under the Cons&#039; agenda for once and tell us what &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; really feel, for once.  On another thread, I&#039;ve expressed that George WMD Bush&#039;s approach to National Guard duty should be an affront to the dedication you obviously have for your Marine Reservist service.  Can you admit that?  Or is Republic Party dogma so much more important to your deep and personal commitment to your country and the Corps?

Come clean, &quot;Nathaniel.&quot;  Consider this a patriotic altar call.

(Oh, and you haven&#039;t invited me to your church yet, either.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Nathaniel&#8221; asks &#8211;</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Are you trying to say that if I was to make racist jokes and bigoted comments towards every group on the blog that would make it ok?</p>
<p>As long as I don’t leave anyone out?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Hell.  Maybe.</p>
<p>It works for me, mostly.</p>
<p>Poor ol&#8217; &#8220;Fleettwood&#8221; about stroked out when I posted in favor of capital punishment (with minor reforms) yesterday.  He couldn&#8217;t cope.</p>
<p>I guess the only reason &#8220;Boxlock&#8221; isn&#8217;t posting to this forum today is his promise to bone-dig my previous posts that he thinks will prove I am &#8220;the most vulgar and perverted&#8221; participant in this forum.  I guess that task is taking more work than he anticipated.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve pissed off liberals and Cons on this forum but stand by my opinions with the courage of my convictions.</p>
<p>I was a more-or-less regular listener of Rush Limbaugh for the better part of a decade, just to hear if he&#8217;d actually <i>surprise</i> me with some genuine conservative opinion that didn&#8217;t parrot Republic Party cant.</p>
<p>Never happened.</p>
<p>I can spin the radio dial and channel surf Faux Noise Channel in a half-hour and pretty much pick up all the GOP talking points that show up from Cons on this forum.</p>
<p>Surprise me, &#8220;Nathaniel.&#8221;  Take a step out from under the Cons&#8217; agenda for once and tell us what <i>you</i> really feel, for once.  On another thread, I&#8217;ve expressed that George WMD Bush&#8217;s approach to National Guard duty should be an affront to the dedication you obviously have for your Marine Reservist service.  Can you admit that?  Or is Republic Party dogma so much more important to your deep and personal commitment to your country and the Corps?</p>
<p>Come clean, &#8220;Nathaniel.&#8221;  Consider this a patriotic altar call.</p>
<p>(Oh, and you haven&#8217;t invited me to your church yet, either.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMWalker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364934</link>
		<dc:creator>JMWalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364934</guid>
		<description>&quot;Are you trying to say that if I was to make racist jokes and bigoted comments towards every group on the blog that would make it ok?

As long as I don’t leave anyone out?&quot;
==============================================
Nope. Bigots do that. Maybe I should have said with instead of at.  I don&#039;t consider you a bigot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Are you trying to say that if I was to make racist jokes and bigoted comments towards every group on the blog that would make it ok?</p>
<p>As long as I don’t leave anyone out?&#8221;<br />
==============================================<br />
Nope. Bigots do that. Maybe I should have said with instead of at.  I don&#8217;t consider you a bigot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmos_originally</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364932</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmos_originally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364932</guid>
		<description>Nathaniel,

Aren&#039;t you going to answer my earlier post?

http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364579</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathaniel,</p>
<p>Aren&#8217;t you going to answer my earlier post?</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364579" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364579</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364931</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364931</guid>
		<description>&quot;CF2K didn’t politley (sic) ask,&quot;

Ah, when subjected to anti-semitism, the burden is on the individual that made the offensive remarks - the victim is not obliged to be polite, nor would anyone subject to racial or ethnic bigotry.

But who cares what you think, Price?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;CF2K didn’t politley (sic) ask,&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah, when subjected to anti-semitism, the burden is on the individual that made the offensive remarks &#8211; the victim is not obliged to be polite, nor would anyone subject to racial or ethnic bigotry.</p>
<p>But who cares what you think, Price?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364925</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364925</guid>
		<description>JMWalker,

I love South Park.  My point was that if CF2K is going to be so easily offended by what my father said he should be out boycotting Comedy Central for having South Park on the air.

Are you trying to say that if I was to make racist jokes and bigoted comments towards every group on the blog that would make it ok?

As long as I don&#039;t leave anyone out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JMWalker,</p>
<p>I love South Park.  My point was that if CF2K is going to be so easily offended by what my father said he should be out boycotting Comedy Central for having South Park on the air.</p>
<p>Are you trying to say that if I was to make racist jokes and bigoted comments towards every group on the blog that would make it ok?</p>
<p>As long as I don&#8217;t leave anyone out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364924</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364924</guid>
		<description>WS Clark,

Where are my father and I continuing to make jokes?

CF2K didn&#039;t politley ask, he is still droning on calling us bigots and saying my father is an anti-semite.

As I said, when you act like a reasonable person I will treat you like one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WS Clark,</p>
<p>Where are my father and I continuing to make jokes?</p>
<p>CF2K didn&#8217;t politley ask, he is still droning on calling us bigots and saying my father is an anti-semite.</p>
<p>As I said, when you act like a reasonable person I will treat you like one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMWalker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364922</link>
		<dc:creator>JMWalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364922</guid>
		<description>PSSSSSTTTT, Nathan, you think Ann would go for the celebrity hooker show?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSSSSSTTTT, Nathan, you think Ann would go for the celebrity hooker show?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMWalker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364919</link>
		<dc:creator>JMWalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364919</guid>
		<description>Nathan,
South Park attacks everybody and anything. They hold no favorites, and intend to punch every bigot in the mouth with their own (bigots) sordid brand of logic. In other words, make fun of everybody. Like I always say, if you can&#039;t laugh at yourself, you got no right, or business, laughing at anybody else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan,<br />
South Park attacks everybody and anything. They hold no favorites, and intend to punch every bigot in the mouth with their own (bigots) sordid brand of logic. In other words, make fun of everybody. Like I always say, if you can&#8217;t laugh at yourself, you got no right, or business, laughing at anybody else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364917</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364917</guid>
		<description>&quot;Neither you nor CF2K are reasonable people so why would you expect us to treat you reasonably?&quot;

Well, Mr. Social Skills, I mentioned that most people are considerate enough to stop with anti-Semite or harassing jokes when asked.

Of course, being considerate is part of having social skills, something that we all know you are lacking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Neither you nor CF2K are reasonable people so why would you expect us to treat you reasonably?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, Mr. Social Skills, I mentioned that most people are considerate enough to stop with anti-Semite or harassing jokes when asked.</p>
<p>Of course, being considerate is part of having social skills, something that we all know you are lacking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMWalker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364916</link>
		<dc:creator>JMWalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364916</guid>
		<description>OOOTay . . . let&#039;s get serious here. We have dancing with the stars, celebrity golf and celebrity circus.  What America really wants is:

Celebrity Hooker. The winner is the one who can do the most tricks in a twenty four hour period, and make the most money (pickpocketing is encouraged). The winner gets a free lifetime supply of aids medication. 

Celebrity doper. The winner is the one who can go two hours, thirty seven minutes, completely clean of all drugs ( or figure out a way to beat all tests). The winner gets a free lifetime supply of the drug of his or her choice. 

Celebrity homeless. The winner is the one who can collect the most shopping carts, with no two shopping carts coming from the same store, and survive the gauntlet of die-hard Republicans wielding straw brooms and obsolete remote controls. Carts confiscated by the law do not count in the final total. The winner gets two free mosquito nets, a large, refrigerator sized, cardboard box, and a dog of undetermined origin 

My expertise on producing, writing and directing for the above money making endeavors can be had for a very large sum of money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OOOTay . . . let&#8217;s get serious here. We have dancing with the stars, celebrity golf and celebrity circus.  What America really wants is:</p>
<p>Celebrity Hooker. The winner is the one who can do the most tricks in a twenty four hour period, and make the most money (pickpocketing is encouraged). The winner gets a free lifetime supply of aids medication. </p>
<p>Celebrity doper. The winner is the one who can go two hours, thirty seven minutes, completely clean of all drugs ( or figure out a way to beat all tests). The winner gets a free lifetime supply of the drug of his or her choice. </p>
<p>Celebrity homeless. The winner is the one who can collect the most shopping carts, with no two shopping carts coming from the same store, and survive the gauntlet of die-hard Republicans wielding straw brooms and obsolete remote controls. Carts confiscated by the law do not count in the final total. The winner gets two free mosquito nets, a large, refrigerator sized, cardboard box, and a dog of undetermined origin </p>
<p>My expertise on producing, writing and directing for the above money making endeavors can be had for a very large sum of money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364914</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364914</guid>
		<description>WS Clark,

Neither you nor CF2K are reasonable people so why would you expect us to treat you reasonably?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WS Clark,</p>
<p>Neither you nor CF2K are reasonable people so why would you expect us to treat you reasonably?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364913</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364913</guid>
		<description>CF2K,

You didn&#039;t answer my question either.

Do you watch South Park or do you boycott Comedy Central for putting it on the air?


Cartman:

&quot;Ah ah ah, ah, I know what you&#039;re thinking, Stan. You&#039;re thinking, you&#039;er gonna go tell Kyle. Look, I know you think he&#039;s your best friend, but Kyle is a Jew rat! He has his Jew ethics while he hoards his greedy Jew gold, and he will Jew you out if you tell him about this!&quot;

Innocent cartoon joke or is Comedy Central full of anti-semites that CF2K should be boycotting?

You tell us CF2K?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CF2K,</p>
<p>You didn&#8217;t answer my question either.</p>
<p>Do you watch South Park or do you boycott Comedy Central for putting it on the air?</p>
<p>Cartman:</p>
<p>&#8220;Ah ah ah, ah, I know what you&#8217;re thinking, Stan. You&#8217;re thinking, you&#8217;er gonna go tell Kyle. Look, I know you think he&#8217;s your best friend, but Kyle is a Jew rat! He has his Jew ethics while he hoards his greedy Jew gold, and he will Jew you out if you tell him about this!&#8221;</p>
<p>Innocent cartoon joke or is Comedy Central full of anti-semites that CF2K should be boycotting?</p>
<p>You tell us CF2K?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364911</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364911</guid>
		<description>&quot;You are pretending to be offended where no offense was meant.&quot;

As is the case with sexual harassment, it is the &quot;victim&quot; that determines what is harassment or offensive.

Most reasonable people, when told that a remark or comment is anti-Semitic or otherwise offensive, have the decency to apologize and cease and desist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You are pretending to be offended where no offense was meant.&#8221;</p>
<p>As is the case with sexual harassment, it is the &#8220;victim&#8221; that determines what is harassment or offensive.</p>
<p>Most reasonable people, when told that a remark or comment is anti-Semitic or otherwise offensive, have the decency to apologize and cease and desist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364908</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 19:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364908</guid>
		<description>CF2K,

I think you are being rather disingenuous.

You are pretending to be offended where no offense was meant.

Playing the typical liberal &quot;I&#039;m a victim card&quot;

Sorry, CF2K, it is not going to work.

Neither my father nor I are racists, bigots, or anti-semites.

You are taking something my father said and going way overboard with it.  

Just like the liberals always do, they find some little nugget of something that was said and act as if they uncovered the entire mine full of something that was never there.

As I said, you better hide in your basement because you need some thicker skin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CF2K,</p>
<p>I think you are being rather disingenuous.</p>
<p>You are pretending to be offended where no offense was meant.</p>
<p>Playing the typical liberal &#8220;I&#8217;m a victim card&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry, CF2K, it is not going to work.</p>
<p>Neither my father nor I are racists, bigots, or anti-semites.</p>
<p>You are taking something my father said and going way overboard with it.  </p>
<p>Just like the liberals always do, they find some little nugget of something that was said and act as if they uncovered the entire mine full of something that was never there.</p>
<p>As I said, you better hide in your basement because you need some thicker skin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monkeyhawk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364904</link>
		<dc:creator>Monkeyhawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 19:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-68/#comment-364904</guid>
		<description>&quot;CF2K&quot; --

Thanks (although I&#039;m sure it was painful) for posting the Martin Luther stuff.  (Those wacky Germans!  Will they never quit?*)

&lt;i&gt;* Seriously.  Will they ever quit?&lt;/i&gt;

Granted, some &quot;Christian&quot; sects have renounced their theological antisemitism, but its at the core of their movement and, especially among fundamentalists, is never far beneath the surface.

Additionally, a national newspaper in Germany yesterday published on its front page a picture of the White  House with the headline: &quot;Uncle Barack&#039;s Cabin?&quot;**

&lt;i&gt;** Seriously.  The Germans are (like most American CONservatives) are so racist, they don&#039;t even realize it as they&#039;re being it.  Will they ever quit?&lt;/i&gt;

Probably not.  Not all of &#039;em, anyway.  There&#039;s still 25% or so of them who &lt;i&gt;still&lt;/i&gt; think Shrub&#039;s doing a good a good job!  Hell, even Barney*** doesn&#039;t think Shrub&#039;s doing a good job.  

&lt;i&gt;***Then again, Barney is black.&lt;/i&gt;

The Republic Party is going to join its rightful place on the dust heap of history, along with the Whigs and their intellectual ancestors, the Know-Nothing Party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;CF2K&#8221; &#8211;</p>
<p>Thanks (although I&#8217;m sure it was painful) for posting the Martin Luther stuff.  (Those wacky Germans!  Will they never quit?*)</p>
<p><i>* Seriously.  Will they ever quit?</i></p>
<p>Granted, some &#8220;Christian&#8221; sects have renounced their theological antisemitism, but its at the core of their movement and, especially among fundamentalists, is never far beneath the surface.</p>
<p>Additionally, a national newspaper in Germany yesterday published on its front page a picture of the White  House with the headline: &#8220;Uncle Barack&#8217;s Cabin?&#8221;**</p>
<p><i>** Seriously.  The Germans are (like most American CONservatives) are so racist, they don&#8217;t even realize it as they&#8217;re being it.  Will they ever quit?</i></p>
<p>Probably not.  Not all of &#8216;em, anyway.  There&#8217;s still 25% or so of them who <i>still</i> think Shrub&#8217;s doing a good a good job!  Hell, even Barney*** doesn&#8217;t think Shrub&#8217;s doing a good job.  </p>
<p><i>***Then again, Barney is black.</i></p>
<p>The Republic Party is going to join its rightful place on the dust heap of history, along with the Whigs and their intellectual ancestors, the Know-Nothing Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
