Open thread 6/17

thread

189 Comments

  1. HLP
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 6:11 am | Permalink

    BRITISH PARLIAMENTARIANS CLASH OVER CAUSE OF CLIMATE CHANGE

    The “apocalyptic visions” of environmentalists are not justified by the evidence about global warming, according to a Midland MP. John Maples (Con Stratford) told the House of Commons he did not believe scientists really understood what was happening to the earth’s climate. He sounded a note of scepticism in a debate which highlighted the lack of consensus among Britain’s politicians about the environment.

    Black Country MP Rob Marris (Lab Wolverhampton South West) told colleagues to “wake up and smell the coffee” and accept the world was not going to stop creating the pollution believed to cause global warming. Most MPs and staff failed even to turn the lights off in the Commons toilets, he said. Britain should focus on how it was going to cope with global warming, instead of hoping it could avoid the problem by cutting back on carbon emissions, he said.

    They were speaking during a debate on the Climate Change Bill, which will set a legally binding target for reducing UK carbon dioxide emissions by at least 26 per cent by 2020. Mr Maples said: “Until a couple of months ago, I was happily riding this consensus and accepted the received wisdom. I thought it was probably being exaggerated a bit, but then people usually do that. However, I then made the mistake of reading a few books and quite a lot of analysis … that has led me to a couple of conclusions that trouble me a lot.

    “I do not believe that the science is anything like as settled as the proponents of the Bill are making out. In fact, the scientists hedge their predictions with an awful lot of qualifications and maybes that those who invoke them often omit. “The science is a bit like medicine in the 1850s. The scientists are scratching the surface of something that they do not really understand, but no doubt will. “They are probably on to something, but nothing like the whole story. What they say does not justify any of the apocalyptic visions that we have heard set out.”

    He said none of the models scientists had developed to predict how carbon emissions might affect the environment could account for the climate change that had actually taken place. “The record shows that the climate warmed from 1920 to 1940, cooled from 1940 to 1975, rose again from 1975 to 2000, and since 2000 … has not risen at all. In the past seven years, global temperatures have not increased.”

    Mr Marris was also sceptical about plans to reduce carbon emissions, but for different reasons. He said: “I welcome the Bill and I accept that human activity is affecting the climate adversely. I am not a flat-earther.” But he did not accept the “cosy consensus” that everything would be fine if plans were made to cut carbon dioxide emissions, he said. Emissions were currently going up rather than down, he added.

    Some MPs were calling for an 80 per cent cut, he said. “I say to honourable members, `wake up and smell the coffee’. We are not going to achieve 80 per cent – it will be hard to reach 60 per cent, if we consider the number of air trips our constituents make.”

    Global warming would affect Britain’s plans, wildlife and food production, he said. “They will affect issues such as building design and planning regulations; roads and railways, with rails buckling in the heat; water supply, with a need for new reservoirs; what we have to do about coastal defences with rising sea levels; inland flooding, which we saw dramatically last year and which will only get worse; possible civil unrest and its security implications, which other countries and, potentially, we will face; and international development.”

  2. FilmFan
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 6:26 am | Permalink

    I never thought I’d say it – but this morning I must say it……

    I applaud the Eagle’s censorship policies. Because yesterday I deserved it. I don’t often say this; in fact, this is the first time I’ve said it, but…..

    Big Bertha’s losing her cyber-virginity – I’m glad I was censored yesterday afternoon. ‘Cause I said something horrible. Something that shouldn’t be said. I can’t help thinking it – and I still think it this morning. It wasn’t directed at other people, but it was still among the most profane of utterances.

    Were I still a Catholic, I’d have to beat a hasty retreat to the confessional. I’m not sure I would have faced excommunication, but darned close to it.

    Not every belief that one has deserves to be expressed in a public forum. And this was surely one of ‘em.

    Sadistically, I wanted to incite froth-spewing spittle from the biblical brigade; I was gettin’ sick ‘n tired of the dude callin’ himself “American” forcing scriptures down our throats. I wasn’t in the mood for it.

    Candidly, all those delightful, florid Cat Stevens lyrics weren’t moving me. The dude is now a militant Muslim whose prolific quotes on the servility of the female gender don’t deserve mention. Or respect.

    Finally, I had a tummyache all the livelong day, and my mood was beyond foul.

    Some things shouldn’t be said – not in a dignified society. Then again, someone should have shared this admonition with more than a couple biblical writers……………

  3. Boxlock
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 7:12 am | Permalink

    I missed it I guess, but what whatever it was as far as I’m concerned you are forgiven.
    We all need to learn to be civil, it’s not just you.

  4. beber
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 7:37 am | Permalink

    If you were civil, you’d produce no copy.

  5. outlander
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 8:06 am | Permalink

    GLOBAL COOLING UPDATE

    As global temperatures cool, budget busting AGW “cures” are going to be a hard sell. How do you sell ice to an eskimo?

    From the Washington Times:

    “We’re not supposed to call global warming “global warming” any more. That’s so very 20th century. Now it’s “climate change,” just in time for the political high season, and convenient when the climate leaves the natural warming cycle and enters the cooling cycle, as it has done for millions of years. Climate change is the change that Obama, Hillary, John and the rest of us can all believe in, because changing is what the climate does best. Best of all, the hysteria so beloved by Chicken Little and his disciples is preserved, like the pickle we were never in.

    In fact, the earth has been measurably cooling for the last decade, despite everything Al and his followers have done about it. The solar cycle peaked, the sun is quieter, the suns spots have faded and everybody but Al is cooling off. Even the United Nations agrees, and who could disagree with the United Nations? The director of the U.N.’s International Governmental Panel on Climate Change concedes that nature has overwhelmed everything man can do and it might even be another decade before man can rally and the warming resumes. Until then the U.N. and related bureaucracies, which have blown through billions of dollars in “research” to prove that man not nature rules the cosmos, must work hard to keep up the hysteria level.”

    http://www.washtimes.com/news/2008/jun/17/pruden-not-dead-yet-and-cooling/

  6. StevenEDavis
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 8:18 am | Permalink

    Wahington Times = Moonie newspaper

    Not credible on its face.

  7. outlander
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 8:25 am | Permalink

    Good morning Steven. Say, what do you think we should do about this global cooling that is going on and predicted by NASA to continue for the next 20 plus years?

  8. Monkeyhawk
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 8:53 am | Permalink

    I guess a lot of political issues devolve into the old NIMBY (Not in My Back Yard) problem.

    So let’s imagine it’s a warm June evening and you’re sitting in your back yard.

    Which would you rather have?

    A frosty cold bottle of Coca-Cola?

    Or two new mega-huge coal-fired power plants with potential CO-2 emissions of up to 11 million tons a year?

    Same diff, according to Kansas Represntative Bill Otto.

    “If carbon dioxide is an imminent threat to our health, then [Kansas] should have banned carbonated beverages, too,” said at a campaign appearance over the weekends. Otto said soft drinks are more dangerous to people’s health than the pollution caused by the CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants.

    Anyone who votes for this guy is a bigger dolt than he is.

  9. SolDevVB
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:14 am | Permalink

    Friends of BlueJay/J R
    Get your boy some help. He has lost it. Get his kid some help too. God only knows the damage he has already inflicted on his son…
    _____________________________________________
    blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-613/#comment-368255
    Let government take the gold and make the rules.

    _____________________________________________
    blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-613/#comment-368109
    “Freedom’s just another word for nothing left to lose.”

    _____________________________________________
    blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-613/#comment-368123
    The minute a person is forced to sustain their survival and sustenance by punching a clock, pushing a broom, or answering a phone FOR someone else?
    That person is no longer free.

    _____________________________________________
    blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-616/#comment-369884
    What he is saying is that he is on welfare and he wants to keep that pie for his own self.

    _____________________________________________
    blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-616/#comment-369525
    My son was about 8 I guess.
    Then, I told my son, your friends have to do whatever you say. If they please you, give them a penny.
    My son VERY quickly turned into a pint sized dictator
    He had them tying and untying his shoes, kissing his foot, doing dances, standing on their heads, calling each other names and hitting each other!
    Let me show you how a Democrat does things. I collected up ALL the change

    _____________________________________________
    blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-616/#comment-369588
    And don’t talk to me about messing with kids heads.

    _____________________________________________
    blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-616/#comment-369820
    Obama says he wants to work with you.
    I hope he works you over.

    _____________________________________________
    blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-616/#comment-369807
    Know what makes the BlueJay smile?
    You cons are dying out.

  10. Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:16 am | Permalink

    I’ll take “frosty coke and a smile” for $100, Alex.

    And I’d like the coke to be in one of those little six ounce glass bottles like we got at gas station pop machines for a dime when I was a kid!

    Heh MonkeyHawk, and it isnt even an original gaff. Neufeld was the first to suggest we should ban sodas if we dont build the Holcomb plant.

    WTF?

    And people wonder why western Kansas is in the shithole… look who we send to Topeka!

  11. HLP
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:23 am | Permalink

    Well outlander,

    The most obvious thing to do is to revise our computer programs so that they can be shown to have been right all along.

    More importantly, we have a lot of research and scientific data invested in ‘bad CO2′ so now we need to shift the empahsis to the ‘acidification’ of the oceans!

    Then in twenty years when none of the current apocolyptic concerns bear fruition for the environmental nitwits we’ll have moved on to the next American caused looming disaster that can only be prevented by giving someone like Algore dominion over our lives.

  12. Herbert_Spencer
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:25 am | Permalink

    So give us the good news, which of you losers got the sack? If McClatchey knows what they’re doing, the whole editorial board is gone. That alone would vastly increase this rag’s reputation, but they’d still have to change and use the news pages for news instead of leftist propaganda. I can’t think of another time I wanted someone to lose their jobs, but with The Eagle and The Star it’s like hearing that Reinhard Heydrich got shot. Whoopee!!! Shut it down.

  13. Grateful_Dave
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:31 am | Permalink

    I don’t know, based on the weather I’ve seen lately, I would say the climate is changing regardless of what the charts and experts say.

    “You don’t need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows”

  14. HLP
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:32 am | Permalink

    Good Morning Farm Girl!

    I got a lot of money that says those were 7 ounce coke bottles.

    I liked to get the 12 ounce bottles, take that first, long, mind freezing swaller then put a small bag of Planter’s peanuts in the bottle.

    The service station I worked in when I was 15 always had a few Snickers candy bars frozen in the back for those hot summer days!

  15. Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:35 am | Permalink

    Before Regular took over the Open thread with his canard that “the Democratic Party is responsible for all racism in the US,” I had posed a simple “yes or no” question that the Bible-spouting CONs found too difficult to answer:

    “Do you agree with CONservative religious leaders–Jerry Fallwell, Pat Robertson, and John Hagee–that God sent Katrina and 9-11 to punish a disobedient nation?”

    Outlander made a stab at it by saying that God do this if He wanted to . . . uh, yeah, outlander, God could do anything he wanted since He is traditionally viewed as omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent. That doesn’t answer the question, though.

    DID GOD PUNISH THE US BY SENDING A HURRICAINE AND ALLOWING A TERRORIST ATTACK?

    I say no.

    The CONs are too cowardly to express their opinions on this issue because they know they can’t defend them, apparently.

  16. Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:40 am | Permalink

    Well Hank, they certainly could have been seven ounces. I wont argue the point. I just remember them being damn good, and for some reason, they STILL taste better!

    Ummm… frozen Snickers…. ummmmmmmm…….

    Better than listening to and looking at Rachel Maddow!

  17. Monkeyhawk
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:42 am | Permalink

    “HLP says –

    “I got a lot of money that says those were 7 ounce coke bottles.”

    Pay up, “HLP.”

    As it happens, I have a gold-plated Coca-Cola bottle, from the company’s 50-year anniversary (the 1950s sometime) right here on my desk.

    It’s clearly embossed: “CONTENTS 6 1/2 FL. OZS.”

    When Coke came out in “King Size” bottles, you got 10 ounces.

    “I liked to get the 12 ounce bottles, take that first, long, mind freezing swaller then put a small bag of Planter’s peanuts in the bottle.”

    The truth belies the old Pepsi-Cola hits the spot jingle:

    “Twelve full ounces, that’s a lot.”
    Twice as much for a nickel, too!
    Pepsi-Cola is the drink for you!”

    Twelve full ounces wasn’t “twice as much!”

  18. Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:45 am | Permalink

    KGrrl–

    I always thought Cokes tasted better in the past than they do now too.

    Then I went to Mexico about two years ago. Their Cokes taste better–like the Coke we remember.

    Why?

    Turns out Coke used to use cane sugar and then in the 70’s switched over to cheaper corn syrup. Mexican Coke still uses sugar. Makes it more sharply sweet IMHO.

    Also, they still use glass bottles in Mexico. Don’t know if plastic affects taste or not, but glass is more insulative so it stays colder longer.

  19. Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:48 am | Permalink

    Oh, jeez, I just realized–now that I said something was better in another country than here, some CON is bound to pop up out of his mole hole and say, “if you love Mexico so much, why don’t you move there, you America-hater?”

    Sigh . . .

  20. HLP
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:48 am | Permalink

    Good Morning Capn!

    As one of the ‘CONs’ on the BLOG I apologize, I seemed to have missed your question. I occasionally read your posts but most of the time I miss your point when I do.

    I think it is presumptuos to think that God punishes us with these various disasters. We do a pretty good job of getting what we generally deserve without His devine participation.

    I’m pretty sure that the ‘judgement day’ will be suficient to fullfill His ‘punishment’.

    So, with no reluctance at all, I wholeheartedly agree with you!

  21. Phantom
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:51 am | Permalink

    First, the important question – what does the world think of America? For the first time since the commencement of the Iraq War, there was a slight uptick in favorable attitudes towards the U.S., with positive views increasing since 2007 in half of the countries for which comparative data was available. Such statistics are good news for the nation, but perhaps not so much for George W. Bush, whose departure from the White House next January is the likely cause for the increases. Only three nations – Tanzania, Nigeria, and India – had majorities who expressed confidence in Bush’s handling of world affairs. Each of the other 21 countries, by wide margins, held little to no confidence in President Bush.

    Majorities in 39% of nations polled believe that whoever replaces Bush will change U.S. foreign policy for the better, though in 20 out of 23 nations surveyed, more people have confidence in Sen. Barack Obama than in Sen. John McCain. America also scores high ratings for the quality of its democracy. Majorities in two-thirds of countries surveyed say that the U.S. respects the personal freedoms of its citizens.

    That’s the good news. The bad news is that, “with few exceptions, the American economy is now seen as having a negative impact on national economies, both large and small, in all parts of the world,” according to the study’s authors. Additionally, the majority of nations included think that the U.S. is extremely influential in their nations – and that such influence is not a good thing. More than half the nations polled see the United States as the world’s top polluter – and Americans are considered among the least concerned about the effects of global warming. The nation most trusted to “do the right thing in protecting the world’s environment” -

  22. Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:54 am | Permalink

    Thank you, Hank.

    I appreciate you answering the question directly, the first to do so.

    You realize of by saying what you said however you are criticising Hagee, Robertson, and Falwell.

  23. Phantom
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:00 am | Permalink

    Sounds alot like when the Soviets controlled Kabul.
    Taliban militants destroy bridges in Afghanistan By NOOR KHAN, Associated Press Writer
    Tue Jun 17, 7:34 AM ET

    ARGHANDAB, Afghanistan – Taliban militants destroyed bridges and planted mines in several villages they control outside southern Afghanistan’s largest city in apparent preparation for battle, residents and officials said Tuesday.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    More than 700 families — meaning perhaps 4,000 people or more — had fled the Arghandab district 10 miles northwest of Kandahar city, said Sardar Mohammad, a police officer manning a checkpoint on the east side of the Arghandab River. Police on Tuesday stopped and searched every person passing on the road.

    On the west side of the river, hundreds of Taliban controlled around nine or 10 villages, Mohammad said.

    “Last night the people were afraid, and families on tractors, trucks and taxis fled the area,” said Mohammad. “Small bridges inside the villages have been destroyed.”

  24. Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:08 am | Permalink

    Greg Mitchell:

    McKinney had been on the scene after a 500-pound bomb left five of his soldiers and an Iraqi interpreter dead; he was in a vehicle when another bomb blew up just two feet away, almost killing him and his men; he had consoled a soldier who lost a leg to a roadside bomb.

    And he had stopped eating, stopped sleeping and become convinced he was not doing enough to keep his soldiers safe.

    But even after a soldier found him sitting in a wooden supply shack, staring emptily into space, even after his face grew gaunt from weight loss, even after he was unable to form the thoughts necessary to give a morning briefing, McKinney kept going out on patrol.

    And that is the part that everyone — soldiers, commanders and family — must now struggle with, each and every day….

    As of May 3, 139 soldiers, 25 Marines and seven sailors have killed themselves in the Iraq and Afghanistan war zones, according to Pentagon data.

    ******

    Thank God, Bush doesn’t allow us to see their coffins on TV.

  25. Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:11 am | Permalink

    But, but, but, Phantom, the difference between us and them is night and day.

    The Soviets installed an unelected puppet dictator. We on the other hand installed an unelected puppet president.

    See the difference?

  26. Monkeyhawk
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:12 am | Permalink

    “CapnAmerica,” always an advocate of the Real Thing, says –

    “…Coke used to use cane sugar and then in the 70’s switched over to cheaper corn syrup. Mexican Coke still uses sugar.

    Exactly. In areas with a substantial Jewish population (I discovered this is Los Angeles) Coca-Cola markets bottles with green caps during the Passover season. The contents are made with cane sugar instead of high-fructose corn syrup due to some dietary law.

    It’s better.

    I don’t know whether I agree cane sugar Coke is “sweeter,” but the bite is there. And it mixes with bourbon or rum much better.

  27. Phantom
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:13 am | Permalink

    NOte the scientist name, who would you guess he was spying for?
    Former Boeing scientist charged in defense probe
    Tuesday June 17, 10:57 am ET
    Lawyer: Former Boeing scientist to plead guilty to retaining national defense data

    LOS ANGELES (AP) — A former Boeing Co. scientist who specialized in anti-missile systems plans to plead guilty to unlawfully retaining national defense information, his attorney said.
    Abraham Lesnik, 68, was charged Monday, nearly two years after a federal investigation into whether he misused classified information, prosecutors said. He could receive up to 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine if convicted.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Lesnik appeared in court, where U.S. Magistrate judge set his bail at $150,000, Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Zweiback said.

    A trial date was set for Aug. 12, but Lesnik’s attorney, Marc Harris, said his client will plead guilty.

    U.S. Attorney’s Office spokesman Thom Mrozek said most of the case was under seal. A charging document alleges Lesnik had unauthorized possession of 10 classified documents and one “top secret” document “pertaining to national defense satellite threat mitigation.”

    The FBI searched Lesnik’s San Fernando Valley home three times in 2006 and confiscated a laptop computer.

    Lesnik’s Department of Defense security clearance was listed as “Secret, Special Access” until he was terminated by Boeing in 2007, according to a court document he filed to prevent Boeing officials from examining his computer. He argued it contained personal financial, medical and family information.

    Calls to Boeing after business hours were not returned Monday.

  28. Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:17 am | Permalink

    Thanks for the info, MH. I’ll look for the green pop top from now on, if I can find it.

    Phantom–hehehe. Just imagine if his last name was Al Arab or something similar.

    Why, then he’d be a terrorist!

  29. Monkeyhawk
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:25 am | Permalink

    The Republic Party Good News Fairy –

    http://www.salon.com/comics/tomo/2008/06/17/tomo/

  30. HLP
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    “You realize of by saying what you said however you are criticising Hagee, Robertson, and Falwell.”

    I believe that Robertson and Falwell have good hearts, Hagee. . .well, he’s a nut.

    Ministers should be employees of the church. They should be accountable to the elders. The elders need to be a group of men that are good responsible members, qualified to be deacons in the church.

    When you have charaamatic figure in charge of a movement or church it is too hard for them to be corrupted. The only monetary concerns they should have are their salary and are they earning it. I’m not saying that Robertson and Falwell are corupted, just that they seem to be concerned with issues other than my soul.

    I don’t qualify to be a deacon in my church, because I’ve been divorced. (among other reasons we won’t go into) But I respect the elders and deacons in my church and have a means of input. The most important means is the ability to choose my church!

  31. MaxGrobnik
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:48 am | Permalink

    Hey Mayor Nagin:

    Look out! It’s Hurricane Season! Big clue for ya: E-V-A-C-U-A-T-E if a Hurricane approaches.

    Oh, and watch TV for weather forecasts.

    $7 BILLION SPENT ON NEW ORLEANS and $5 BILLION MORE ON THE WAY – It Still Ain’t Enough.

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,367822,00.html

    NOAA: New Orleans at Risk From Cat. 2 Hurricane
    Tuesday, June 17, 2008

    BATON ROUGE, La. — Despite a massive effort to repair and upgrade flood defenses since Hurricane Katrina, storm surge could pour over levees in New Orleans if a strong Category 2 or higher hurricane strikes the city, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said Monday.

  32. Heckler
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 11:18 am | Permalink

    Good read through Boortz . Long so I won’t post it all here. There’s a fair amount of snark but a lot of good info.

    The Greatest Hoax Ever Perpetrated
    http://www.cityviewmag.com/stories-the-greatest-hoax-ever-perpetrated_134.html

    snip
    Joseph D’Alea, the first Director of Meteorology at The Weather Channel and former chief of the American Meteorological Society’s Committee on Weather Analysis and Forecast, says that “carbon dioxide (CO2) is 0.000383 of our atmosphere by volume. . . Only 0.0275 of atmospheric CO2 is [man-made] in origin. . . We are responsible for 0.00001 of this atmosphere. If the atmosphere were a 100-story building, our [man-made] CO2 contribution today would be equivalent to the linoleum on the first floor.” Do we really want to spend a trillion dollars on linoleum?

  33. Regular
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 11:37 am | Permalink

    “DID GOD PUNISH THE US BY SENDING A HURRICAINE AND ALLOWING A TERRORIST ATTACK?”
    ===================================
    Capn always posing NIGYYSOB (Now I got you, you Son of a B____)questions.

    I was always taught that after the great flood, God would never again inflict damage on mankind on a massive scale, that is until the end of times.

    And no, I don’t haven’t anything against Falwell, Hagee or anyone else. Misguided thoughts I might say, but they are entitled to their beliefs.

  34. Regular
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 11:39 am | Permalink

    Herbert_Spencer
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:25 am | Permalink
    So give us the good news, which of you losers got the sack? If McClatchey knows what they’re doing, the whole editorial board is gone. That alone would vastly increase this rag’s reputation, but they’d still have to change and use the news pages for news instead of leftist propaganda. I can’t think of another time I wanted someone to lose their jobs, but with The Eagle and The Star it’s like hearing that Reinhard Heydrich got shot. Whoopee!!! Shut it down.
    ———————————

    You know something we don’t Herbert?

  35. Herbert_Spencer
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 11:53 am | Permalink

    I wish I did, but the one thing I do know is that they need to fire some more because they still suck.

  36. Heckler
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 11:58 am | Permalink

    “Denver police are stocking up on guns that fire a pepper spray-like substance instead of bullets – a less-lethal weapon used to disperse crowds – in advance of the Democratic National Convention.”

    http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/jun/17/denver-stocks-up-on-pepper-weapon/
    teehee

    Water cannons too maybe?

  37. Heckler
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 12:03 pm | Permalink

    Charges dropped against another Haditha Marine.

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,368023,00.html

    Wonder if the self-serving pig Murtha will appologize to him?

  38. Monkeyhawk
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 12:07 pm | Permalink

    Get used to saying, Vice-President Jennifer Granholm. The Governor of Michigan is an articulate communicator who really captures the mood of the country and blue collar workers after living under the Conservative agenda for almost eight years.

    On “The Situation Room Monday Governor Granholm quickly and easily deconstructed McCain’s talking points on every economic issue Wolf brought up.

    GRANHOLM: I’ll tell you what blue collar American wants. They want a change in the White House. They don’t want a third Bush term. Here in Michigan, in small towns across our state, where we have seen jobs go on a slow boat to China, on the Internet to India, or on a fast track to Mexico, we want to make sure that we have an investment, a manufacturing policy in this country that supports our job providers so we can keep jobs here. Bush and McCain will further the unfair trade policies that have hurt states like Michigan.

    People are mad in Michigan. We’re mad that the Bush administration has stood idly by while we have lost almost 400,000 jobs since Bush became president.

    Can you imagine that, Wolf? Four hundred thousand jobs. That’s our own version of Hurricane Katrina, only it’s {trickled out} over the past seven and a half years. So we need a change in the White House. That’s what people are mad at. They’re mad at a White House that has not paid attention to middle America.

  39. Posted June 17, 2008 at 12:12 pm | Permalink

    CYNTHIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/34179

    “McKinney Says People Must ‘Flip the Script” Again, Urges Mass Mobilization Supporting Impeachment

    In a prepared statement released today, six-term former
    Georgia Congresswoman and candidate for the 2008 Green
    Party Presidential Nomination urged the broad and diverse
    Coalition forming around her campaign to “take any and all
    steps necessary” to build support for action on H.Res. 1258,
    the Kucinich resolution to impeach President George Bush.

    Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich, on Monday, June 9th, spent
    five hours on the Floor of the U.S. House of Representatives,
    reading thirty-five Articles of Impeachment laying out
    the case that George Bush ought to be removed from office
    for ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’. In her statement,
    Ms. McKinney extends her appreciation to her former colleague
    “for his courage and tenacity, for the comprehensiveness of
    his research, and for the leadership he exhibited to press
    forward the democratic demands of the People for accountability
    and justice.” On the Ohio Congressman’s motion, his Impeachment
    Resolution was then referred to the House Committee on Judiciary
    in a recorded 251-166 vote.

    Ms. McKinney became the first Member of Congress to introduce
    Articles of Impeachment against the Bush Administration,
    naming Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of State
    Condoleeza Rice in charges which she introduced during the
    109th Congress. McKinney parted ways with the Democrat Party
    partly for their failure to fulfill their Constitutional
    responsibilities, when House Speaker Nancy Pelosi took
    impeachment ‘off the table’.”

  40. SolDevVB
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 12:27 pm | Permalink

    Get used to saying, Vice-President Jennifer Granholm.

    Cause she has done so much good for Michigan.

    Just look how well she does with our tax dollars…

    http://www.wxyz.com/content/news/investigators/story.aspx?content_id=4d2d270b-8b66-4a6f-a9bc-5ef4a97d6813

  41. Regular
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 12:33 pm | Permalink

    Ya, Jennifer Granholm is looking like yet another tax and spend Democrat Sol.

    Maybe Obama will select her, we can only be so lucky.

  42. SolDevVB
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 12:35 pm | Permalink

    Here is a question; Granholm is a Canuck. If Obama won in November and (God forbid) picked Granholm and (God forbid) he died, we would have a foreign born president.

    Can that happen?

  43. WSClark
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 12:41 pm | Permalink

    “Jennifer Granholm is looking like yet another tax and spend Democrat”

    As opposed to “borrow and spend” Republicans. Remember, 75% of the National Debt has been generated under the last three Republican presidents. Also, remember that Bash II never vetoed a bill until AFTER the 2006 elections.

    Whoops!

  44. WSClark
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 12:41 pm | Permalink

    “Can that happen?”

    Nope, the VP has to meet qualifications to be prez.

  45. Monkeyhawk
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 12:43 pm | Permalink

    “Regular” trots out the ol’ “Tax and Spend” Democrat meme –

    Do you wear a mullet, too?

    Here’s more of the Granholm transcript:

    “GRANHOLM — The Obama plan has significant middle class, working class tax cuts. In fact, there was a national study that is a neutral study which said that average Americans, middle class Americans, would see three times as much of a tax break under Obama than they would under McCain.

    I mean, the bottom line is, McCain — I’m not sure what his education policy is. I’m not sure what his energy policy is. But Barack Obama came to Michigan today, to Flint, Michigan, which is the heart of the auto industry. The reason why Michigan’s economy is so challenged because of this massive contraction in our automotive sector.

    So he came right to the heart of the auto industry. And what he said is that he is going to invest $150 billion in an entire energy sector of this country, creating jobs, millions of jobs in energy. That, for a state like Michigan, is hugely important to hear. He had specific plans for us.

    BLITZER: All right. I guess what McCain is suggesting is that if you start raising taxes, even for wealthy Americans, families making more than $200,000 or $250,000 a year, and you start increasing capital gains taxes, and other taxes related to investments, that’s going to hurt the aggregate, the overall U.S. economy. And it will further make it difficult for job creation and everything else you want in Michigan.

    GRANHOLM: Well, the whole point that Barack Obama was making is that you have to make strategic investments in the areas that you know will grow jobs. He said that he would eliminate capital gains taxes on those entrepreneurs, the kind of jobs we want to create. But the very, very, very wealthiest, they can afford to contribute to the investment in our country to allow people to be able to go to college.

    Every economist will tell you that the smartest economic development strategy is making sure you have a skilled work force for those employers. And that’s exactly what Barack Obama’s plan is.

    BLITZER: McCain’s really been hitting Obama hard over the past few days about those so-called “bitter” comments he made during the primary against Hillary Clinton. Listen to this latest — this latest statement that McCain made just today.

    (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

    MCCAIN: I won’t tell them that in small towns across America and in Pennsylvania, that they are bitter or angry about their economic conditions, so therefore they embrace religion and the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. I will never do that.

    (END VIDEO CLIP)

    BLITZER: All right. Do you want to respond to that? Because he’s suggesting that Obama is simply out of touch with blue collar working Americans.

    GRANHOLM: I’ll tell you what blue collar American wants. They want a change in the White House. They don’t want a third Bush term.

    Here in Michigan, in small towns across our state, where we have seen jobs go on a slow boat to China, on the Internet to India, or on a fast track to Mexico, we want to make sure that we have an investment, a manufacturing policy in this country that supports our job providers so we can keep jobs here. Bush and McCain will further the unfair trade policies that have hurt states like Michigan.

    People are mad in Michigan. We’re mad that the Bush administration has stood idly by while we have lost almost 400,000 jobs since Bush became president.

    Can you imagine that, Wolf? Four hundred thousand jobs. That’s our own version of Hurricane Katrina, only it’s trickled out over the past seven and a half years. So we need a change in the White House. That’s what people are mad at. They’re mad at a White House that has not paid attention to middle America.

    BLITZER: How big of a deal is it that Senator Obama’s going to have a special guest in Michigan with him later tonight. The former vice president of the United States, Al Gore, will be in your beautiful state to make this ringing endorsement.

    GRANHOLM: Well, if you’re making that announcement, I can’t confirm. But if it were true that Al Gore was coming here, I could tell you that it is a great statement.

    We in Michigan want to reinvent Michigan. We want to rebuild a clean, green state where technology and green technology and alternative energy and renewable energy is the sector of growth for job creation to replace those lost manufacturing jobs. And I tell you, if you look at what Al Gore has done in elevating the dialogue about climate change and in taking action, he will tell you that this is — yes, it’s good for the planet, but it’s also good for the economy and for jobs. And that’s where Michigan stands right there.”

    Somehow, I doubt “Regular” earns more than $250,000 a year. Ya gotta wonder what dog he has in this particular tax policy discussion.

  46. SolDevVB
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 12:45 pm | Permalink

    Then Granholm is out. Canadian born.

    Governor Granholm quickly and easily deconstructed McCain’s talking points on every economic issue

    Any given 7th grader could do that.

  47. Posted June 17, 2008 at 12:54 pm | Permalink

    If Obama won in November and (God forbid) picked Granholm and (God forbid) he died, we would have a foreign born president.

    Can that happen?
    ========================================

    That’s a good question Sol… My first response would be YES… because the Constitution specifies non-foreign born to be ELECTED President…

    However, I think you need to do a COTUS bone dig to see what the commentaries say about this one…

    IF she could be a VP — Then, the Republicans MIGHT want to consider Schwarzenegger for their VP!! Also, foreign born…

    Kissinger was Secretary of State… a person in line to Presidential succession… and HE was also foreign born… Should he have been able to be Secretary of State??

    See, I ma not sure how it works, when it comes to lines of succession…

    BUT — Good question!!

  48. Posted June 17, 2008 at 12:56 pm | Permalink

    correction * non-foreign born NOT to be ELECTED as President *

  49. Posted June 17, 2008 at 12:57 pm | Permalink

    oh damn, you know what I mean… cant type worth a hoot today!! Only those born here can be elected Preident… DAMN!!

  50. Monkeyhawk
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 1:04 pm | Permalink

    Yeah. Turns out she was born in British Columbia. So she can’t run for Vice-President. My bad.

    Then again, John Sidney McCain the Third (for Shrub’s 3rd term) was born in Panama…

  51. SolDevVB
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 1:06 pm | Permalink

    Panama. Yeah no one really brought that to light. Isn’t there some confusion on Obama too?

  52. Posted June 17, 2008 at 1:35 pm | Permalink

    I am not at all sure about those in the line of succession to the Presidency… But I know that only those born here can run for President… Somebody needs to chase that one down…

  53. Posted June 17, 2008 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

    What confusion would there be about Obama?? He was born in the U.S.

  54. SolDevVB
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 1:48 pm | Permalink

    “Barack Obama was born in Hawaii.

    If you consider the history and believe that Hawaii is not legally a part of the United States, as many do, then one might ask, is Obama a natural born citizen of the United States?

    One could even make the argument that being born in Hawaii, he’s a Hawaiian national! I believe the most compelling legal analysis based on Hawaiian kingdom and international law and precedent, is that the Hawaiian national population today is comprised of descendants of Hawaiian subjects and those foreigners who were born in the Hawaiian Islands prior to 1898. But it is a gray area that obviously hasn’t been tested. In looking at the Baltic states as what I believe is the most apt comparison, Latvia and Estonia adopted this approach, with only descendants of citizens and persons born in the country prior to the occupation being citizens, while Lithuania adopted a more inclusive approach, providing those born in the country subsequent to the occupation with the option of citizenship as well. Could Obama have the option of becoming a Hawaiian national at some point in the future as the transition unfolds?”

    http://www.hawaiiankingdom.info/C1126750129/E20080215214658/index.html

    Won’t amount to anything. I heard a little something about it, wasn’t sure. Figured folks here would know.

  55. Posted June 17, 2008 at 1:55 pm | Permalink

    “Senator Obama was born in the State of Hawaii two years after it became a state on Aug.21, 1959 As such, he acquired United States citizenship automatically at birth. While it is not necessary to go into all of the other legal errors contained in the posting (and there are many), the simple fact is that, with rare exceptions (children of diplomats), everyone born in the United States is a citizen of the United States at birth.”

  56. Phantom
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 1:55 pm | Permalink

    The bush “Ownership Society”, housing starts fall to lows not seen since Poppy was in office!
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080617/bs_nm/usa_economy_prices_dc_3

  57. Posted June 17, 2008 at 1:56 pm | Permalink

    Sol – the same things could be said of a person born anywhere in the US since this once was sovereign non-European nations.

  58. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/fightthesmearshome/

    http://my.barackobama.com/page/invite/birthcert
    “Senator Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961, after it became a state on August 21st, 1959. Obama became a citizen at birth under the first section of the 14th Amendment”

  59. GMC70
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 2:06 pm | Permalink

    It’s a “natural born citizen,” not necessarily one born in the US. The “McCain born in Panama” canard is long since dismissed as the crap it is. He was born a US citizen to US citizen parents – he’s eligible.

    Chas – the succession problem isn’t a problem. Check out the 12th amendment – the very last line.

    “But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.”

    Kinda makes that a non-issue, doesn’t it?

    The Kissinger problem is interesting. He was in the line of succession as Secretary of State(4th or 5th, I think) but he is of course constitutionally ineligible to be president. He could not therefore succeed to the office. He could not be president.

    But could he have been “acting President?” That’s a more interesting question. Art. II specifically speaks of successors to the office “acting as president.” That language changed with the 25nd amendment (1967), when tradition became written in the Constitution and a succeeding VP in fact becomes President, not “acting” president. But does that same rule apply down the line of succession? Not entirely sure.

    What if a Speaker of the House is foreign born – not all that far-fetched. If she succeeds (she’s 2nd in line, after all) to the office, is she president, or acting president?

    Good question . . .

  60. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 2:08 pm | Permalink

    Dear Hank Price,

    Is your Mr. Maples just ignorant and/or misinformed? Or a liar?

    “He said none of the models scientists had developed to predict how carbon emissions might affect the environment could account for the climate change that had actually taken place.”

    Some graphs of hindcasts,
    http://www.wunderground.com/blog/RickyRood/comment.html?entrynum=62&tstamp=200802

    http://environment.newscientist.com/data/images/ns/cms/dn11649/dn11649-1_688.jpg

    Mr. Maples could also get those graphs from,
    http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-wg1.htm

  61. Posted June 17, 2008 at 2:11 pm | Permalink

    Thanks GMC thats what I wanted to know… And as I said, the lines of succession are an intereting question… such as when Kissinger was Scretary of State, etc….

  62. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 2:15 pm | Permalink

    outlander,

    Global warming causes “climate change”.

    It’s global warming AND climate change.

    Do you have a link to your “… global cooling that is going on and predicted by NASA to continue for the next 20 plus years” claim?

  63. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 2:21 pm | Permalink

    Heckler,

    Do you also argue that a tiny amount of Ebola virus cannot harm a human, because it’s insignificant compared to the mass of the human?

    CO2 accounts for a significant amount of Earth’s “greenhouse” effect.

  64. Posted June 17, 2008 at 2:21 pm | Permalink

    GMC – I thought there was some sort of issue with the older Romney having been born overseas but of US parents. I don’t recall how that was ever resolved. (It became moot anyway)

    In McCain’s case I would note that he was born on “US soil” as opposed to out in the country someplace. If we want to split ahirs I think that should be factored in. Should the children of our soldiers or diplomats be discriminated against? I would hope not.

  65. Regular
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 2:28 pm | Permalink

    cosmos does not understand that a virus is encapsulated and restricted to its virulence in a closed system in living organisms.

    The environment we call earth is a cyclical system of ever open, ever modifying climate events. co2 does not ‘take over’ cells like viruses do.

    cosmos is showing his non-scientist mode today in his weak analogies.

  66. GMC70
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 2:32 pm | Permalink

    ben –

    McCain was born on US soil, as at the time, the Canal Zone was a US possession. Further, both McCain’s parents were US citizens. Thus either way he’s a US citizen.

    It’s a non-issue. I’m amazed anyone even brings it up; it’s as silly as the “Obama born in Hawaii, and Hawaii is not legally part of the US but is a kingdom meme.”

  67. GMC70
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 2:32 pm | Permalink

    ben –

    McCain was born on US soil, as at the time, the Canal Zone was a US possession. Further, both McCain’s parents were US citizens. Thus either way he’s a US citizen.

    It’s a non-issue. I’m amazed anyone even brings it up; it’s as silly as the “Obama born in Hawaii, and Hawaii is not legally part of the US but is a kingdom” meme.

  68. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 2:33 pm | Permalink

    And Hank Price…

    I’m still laughing at your buddy MacRae, who put a link on his page that contradicted his false claim. That’s just plain DUMB.
    http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/open-thread-616/#comment-369903

  69. Posted June 17, 2008 at 2:35 pm | Permalink

    GMC – agreed. And I would say the same about military or diplomatic overseas. A bit less sure in the Romney case but would likely still say eligible.

  70. WSClark
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 2:36 pm | Permalink

    Ah, some of us are soooooooooo old that we can remember that there was a significant issue regarding another Barry – Barry Goldwater when he ran for president in 1964.

    Barry Goldwater was born in Arizona – the Arizona territories two years prior to them becoming a state.

    If memory serves, and I was much more concerned with the Beatles next release than I was politics at that time, it would have been an issue had he won.

    As we all know, Goldwater did not win, so the point was moot.

  71. WSClark
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 2:37 pm | Permalink

    You can say that again, GMC.

  72. Posted June 17, 2008 at 2:39 pm | Permalink

    Good point WSC. I supported Goldwater and my understanding was that he would have qualified.

  73. WSClark
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    “I supported Goldwater and my understanding was that he would have qualified.”

    That has been a long time, Ben. Do you recall how it shook out? Was it considered “natural born citizenship” because it was a territory?

  74. Regular
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    My grandmother was born in Oklahoma territory. I believe Oklahoma didn’t become a state until 1907 or something like that?

  75. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 2:51 pm | Permalink

    ‘Big Oil Gets Sued for Climate Change’
    http://www.desmogblog.com/big-oil-gets-sued-for-climate-change
    “The Tiny arctic village of Kivalina , Alaska could be the beginning of the end for Big Oil. Two veteran tobacco litigators have joined forces in a novel court action to sue oil companies for climate-related damage to the remote Inuit village – and for lying to the public about climate change.

    The irony of Big Oil’s propaganda campaign being their undoing is rich indeed. Keep an eye on this small but important lawsuit hailing from a tiny village in Alaska. Things could get interesting.”

    More details, comparison to tobacco, etc at link.

  76. Regular
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 2:58 pm | Permalink

    Yeah cosmos, let’s sue our way to energy efficiency.

    What a knothead.

  77. fleettwood
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 3:12 pm | Permalink

    “…to sue oil companies for climate-related damage to the remote Inuit village – and for lying to the public about climate change.”

    Bring it on! Then these knuckleheads would have to prove it in court. HA!

  78. HLP
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 3:30 pm | Permalink

    Good afternoon Cosmos!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRaeEIN5Sh8&feature=related

  79. Posted June 17, 2008 at 3:35 pm | Permalink

    WSC – as I recall it was said that he would have been OK as a ‘natural’

  80. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 3:43 pm | Permalink

    BDP fleettwood,

    You might want to research the issue, before saying: “Bring it on!”

    And even if they lose the lawsuit, they help make the public more aware of the tobacco-style tactics used by the fossil-fuel industry.

    http://www.desmogblog.com/big-oil-gets-sued-for-climate-change
    “They must also demonstrate that Big Oil conspired to lie about their product to the public. They have a lot to work with.

    For instance, ExxonMobil was specifically implicated by the Union of Concerned Scientists of funding a Big Tobacco-style PR campaign to misinform the public on climate science.”
    http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science/exxonmobil-smoke-mirrors-hot.html
    ———–

    ‘Conspiracy Theory’
    http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200806/conspiracy

  81. HLP
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    LOL!!

    UCS=George Soros grant whores!

    By the way, what ever happened to those islands that were sinking and tried to blame the US for the oceans rising?

    Nitwits!

  82. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    Dear Hank Price,

    Thank you for proving my point about the lawsuit, with a video from Heartland,

    http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Heartland_Institute#Exxon_Funding

    Which includes a false climate claim from someone at CEI,

    ‘FACTSHEET: Competitive Enterprise Institute, CEI’
    http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php
    “Competitive Enterprise Institute has received $2,005,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.”

    And Hank… I’m sorry that you are not smart enough to understand that the relatively weak orbital forcing did not cause all of the warming.

    ‘The lag between temperature and CO2. (Gore’s got it right.)’
    http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/04/the-lag-between-temp-and-co2
    “Second, the idea that there might be a lag of CO2 concentrations behind temperature change (during glacial-interglacial climate changes) is hardly new to the climate science community.
    Indeed, Claude Lorius, Jim Hansen and others essentially predicted this finding fully 17 years ago, in a landmark paper that addressed the cause of temperature change observed in Antarctic ice core records, well before the data showed that CO2 might lag temperature. In that paper (Lorius et al., 1990), they say that:

    changes in the CO2 and CH4 content have played a significant part in the glacial-interglacial climate changes by amplifying, together with the growth and decay of the Northern Hemisphere ice sheets, the relatively weak orbital forcing

  83. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 4:12 pm | Permalink

    Dear Hank Price,

    Ad hominems don’t work against hard facts.

    http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science/exxonmobil-smoke-mirrors-hot.html
    According to the report, ExxonMobil has funneled nearly $16 million between 1998 and 2005 to a network of 43 advocacy organizations that seek to confuse the public on global warming science.

    Smoke, Mirrors & Hot Air: How ExxonMobil Uses Big Tobacco’s Tactics to “Manufacture Uncertainty” on Climate Change details how the oil company, like the tobacco industry in previous decades, has

    * raised doubts about even the most indisputable scientific evidence

    * funded an array of front organizations to create the appearance of a broad platform for a tight-knit group of vocal climate change contrarians who misrepresent peer-reviewed scientific findings

    * attempted to portray its opposition to action as a positive quest for “sound science” rather than business self-interest

    * used its access to the Bush administration to block federal policies and shape government communications on global warming ”
    —————

  84. fleettwood
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 4:14 pm | Permalink

    For someone with “originally” in his name, you don’t have any original thoughts.
    ‘Sup with that?

  85. fleettwood
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 4:16 pm | Permalink

    “Ad hominems don’t work against hard facts.”

    You mean like this?

    BDP fleettwood,

  86. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 4:17 pm | Permalink

    Dear Hank Price,

    Is this dedicated scientist a “George Soros grant whore”?

    ‘CLAUDE LORIUS’ – Biography
    http://www.cnrs.fr/cw/en/pres/compress/medailleOr2002/Page02.html
    “Claude Lorius, 70, is living proof that a career studded with brilliant scientific advances can begin almost by accident, by simply responding to an ad on a bulletin board, for example. Like the ad he read one day in 1955 on the walls of the University of Besançon (which would lead to a keen appreciation for the frozen southern pole) is now etched in his memory: “Needed: young researchers to join scientific excursions organized in conjunction with the International Geophysical Year.

    More at link.

  87. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 4:19 pm | Permalink

    fleettwood, you are the BDP.

  88. fleettwood
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 4:20 pm | Permalink

    “And even if they lose the lawsuit, they help make the public more aware of the tobacco-style tactics used by the fossil-fuel industry.”

    So, you will admit that this suit is for show and you people cannot prove your side in a court of law?

    One plaque for me.

  89. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 4:55 pm | Permalink

    fleettwood,

    Pointing out a positive even if they lose is not admitting that the suit is for “show”. I believe that they can win.

    But thank you for again proving that you are the BDP.

  90. SolDevVB
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 5:08 pm | Permalink

    “Free Porn Free Cartoon Pokemon Porn 100 Free Porn ”

    Tasty.

    Attention, cartoon porn causes CO2 emissions. Peer reviewed documents can be found here:

    http://WWW.BrokenRecord.org.

  91. fleettwood
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 5:09 pm | Permalink

    “I believe that they can win.”

    Of course you do.

    “desmogblog says it.

    I believe it.

    That settles it.”

    You and the fundamentals have much in common.

  92. WSClark
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 5:17 pm | Permalink

    “So, you will admit that this suit is for show and you people cannot prove your side in a court of law?”

    Sort of like “Reverend” Perryman asking for $2 trillion?

  93. Posted June 17, 2008 at 6:00 pm | Permalink

    “However, in confining his attacks to the Democrats, Perryman ignored the party realignment that occurred in the twentieth century. As PBS illustrated in a documentary titled The Rise and Fall of Jim Crow, “[B]y [President Franklin Delano] Roosevelt’s second term (1937-1940) … the Democratic party had become more liberal, less deferential to Southerners, and more interested in urban issues.”

    As historian David Greenberg documented in his Slate.com “History Lesson” column in 2000, “The GOP’s abandonment of African-Americans commenced with the presidential election of 1876″; “[a]nti-lynching laws [passed in the 1930s] marked the last major civil rights issue on which Republicans were out in front.” Greenberg noted that party “realignment crystallized under President Franklin Roosevelt” when the “Depression hit black Americans disproportionately hard, and FDR’s relief programs, such as the Civilian Conservation Corps and the Public Works Administration, gave them much-needed aid and jobs” around the same time that “Northern and Western Democrats [in Congress] took the lead on progressive racial legislation.”

    Finally, Perryman’s analogy of Democrats paying reparations and the Nazis paying reparations to the Jews is a non sequitur: The Nazi Party was disbanded in 1945 (at the end of World War II) and was, therefore, no longer in existence when the German government began paying Holocaust reparations in 1952, according to the Jewish Virtual Library (which references the American Jewish Historical Society).”

    http://mediamatters.org/items/200407010003

  94. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 6:38 pm | Permalink

    BDP fleettwood,

    No, I believe that they can win because:

    * The climate science is solid, and becomer stronger.

    * The fossil-fuel industry has funded a disinformation campaign during the last few decades.
    ———-

    You AGW deniers are the “fundamentals”. You ignore the science, and instead deeply believe falsehoods from fossil-fuel funded groups like CEI and Heartland.

  95. fleettwood
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 6:44 pm | Permalink

    I look forward to the trial.
    Good luck.
    Too bad, you people have overplayed your hand too many times. Too bad, people with asthma have to pay more and have less effective inhalers for the “ozone hole”.
    Too bad people can’t mow their yard with gas mowers.

    EVERYBODY PANIC!!!!

  96. Boxlock
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 6:48 pm | Permalink

    And they say Abe wouldn’t be a Republican today! Better study history a little harder!!

    * During this political season lets be reminded of these wise words.
    * You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
    * You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
    * You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.
    * You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down.
    * You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.
    * You cannot build character and courage by taking away man’s initiative and independence.
    * You cannot help men permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves.
    ……Abraham Lincoln

  97. WSClark
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 6:56 pm | Permalink

    “And they say Abe wouldn’t be a Republican today!”

    Who said that? Who is “they?”

  98. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 7:01 pm | Permalink

    Tim Ball is in Hank Price’s 3:30 pm Heartland video,

    http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Tim_Ball
    Ball is a Canadian climate change skeptic and was previously a “scientific advisor” to the oil industry-backed organization, Friends of Science.

    Ball is also a writer for Tech Central Station.”

  99. lindainks55
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 7:05 pm | Permalink

    And since when do today’s Republicans reflect ANY of those values listed. They certainly haven’t under the current administration or when they had majorities in both the Senate and the House with a Republican Executive. During those years they

    destroyed everyone but the haves and have mores,

    destroyed several countries including our own,

    brought about the largest debt in history while giving NO indication the word “thrift” is in the Republican vocabulary — let alone that they understand the concept,

    sent the jobs overseas so there were far fewer wage earners,

    incited world hatred of Americans,

    lied, stole, murdered, solicited sex in public bathrooms and with pages, destroyed the Constitution of the United States of America

    and did nothing positive for mankind.

    However there are still the 28%s who support and excuse and prove each day they share one malfunctioning brain cell.

  100. Political_mama
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 7:05 pm | Permalink

    Box, you really should never trust an email pass-along…haven’t you cons figured that out yet?

    http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/William.Boetcker.Quote.C3F9

  101. WSClark
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 7:10 pm | Permalink

    Whoops! Boxlock made a boo-boo……………..

  102. Boxlock
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 7:11 pm | Permalink

    P_mama,
    I assumed something might be wrong with it but a check of Snopes revealed nothing.
    Frankly I don’t care if ‘little Johnny down the block’ said it, as far as I’m concerned it is still
    Timeless and True!
    And that was the point anyway.

  103. WSClark
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 7:27 pm | Permalink

    That makes misquoting okay……….

  104. Regular
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 7:29 pm | Permalink

    “becomer stronger”

    Not only has cosmos dove into matters of science above his head, he’s inventing new words!

    becomer…

  105. lindainks55
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 7:32 pm | Permalink

    around the mountain?

  106. Regular
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 7:35 pm | Permalink

    Airline Terminal Project Gets $5M Federal Grant

    Date: June 17, 2008
    Contact: Dale Goter, Government Relations Manager
    : DGoter@wichita.gov
    : (316) 371-0134

    Plans for a new terminal building at Wichita’s Mid Continent Airport got a boost from the U.S. Department of Transportation with the Monday announcement of a $5.37 million grant from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

    The funds will be used on the first phase of the estimated $150 million project slated for completion in three years. Design of the project is currently underway, and construction of the terminal building could start as early as next spring, according to Victor White, City of Wichita Director of Airports.

    The grant application from the City of Wichita survived a competitive process within the U.S. Department of Transportation, White said. The airport also received a second FAA grant for more than $7.5 million last week that will be used for engineering design work on the new terminal project. The process was aided by a joint letter of support signed by Sens. Pat Roberts and Sam Brownback, along with 4th District Congressman Todd Tiahrt, First District Congressman Jerry Moran and 2nd District Congresswoman Nancy Boyda.

    “This grant is great news for the Wichita area, and for the entire state of Kansas,” Brownback said. The Wichita Mid-Continent Airport over the next several years is undergoing an expansion process that will greatly benefit travelers across the state.”

    Congressman Tiahrt echoed the praise for the new project.

    “Mid-Continent Airport’s new passenger terminal will help make people feel more comfortable and welcome when traveling to Wichita,” Tiahrt said. “This will help increase tourism and business opportunities for our community. I strongly support federal funding for this project that will benefit travelers and the general aviation community by providing expanded space.”

    The $150 million cost of the new terminal will be paid with a combination of federal funds from the U.S. Department of Transportation and Transportation Securities Administration, airport users fees, airline rentals and other airport revenues. No local tax dollars will be used on the project, White said.

  107. ksagnostic
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 7:37 pm | Permalink

    “For someone with “originally” in his name, you don’t have any original thoughts.
    ‘Sup with that?”

    This is an ad hominem. This is a statement that directly attacks the poster as lacking in original thoughts.

    “Ad hominems don’t work against hard facts.”

    This is not. This is a statement.

    But then, Fleetwood is the master of the drive by ad hominem, and not much else.

    That, by the way, IS an ad hominem. It is also, from what I have seen out of fleetwood, a true statement.

  108. Regular
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 7:40 pm | Permalink

    Der Jawless Fisch hat gesprochen!

  109. Boxlock
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 7:45 pm | Permalink

    WSClark Posted June 17, 2008 at 7:27 pm
    “That makes misquoting okay…”

    WS,
    If not for P_mamma you would never have known, and would have been rude just the same as that’s your nature.
    I’ve learned that just as a snake can’t get up and walk, you will never be an agreeable or likable human being.

  110. Regular
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 7:49 pm | Permalink

    oxlock
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 7:45 pm | Permalink
    WSClark Posted June 17, 2008 at 7:27 pm
    “That makes misquoting okay…”

    WS,
    If not for P_mamma you would never have known, and would have been rude just the same as that’s your nature.
    I’ve learned that just as a snake can’t get up and walk, you will never be an agreeable or likable human being.

    ————————
    careful Box, Clark will go on his long list of how good looking he his, intelligent, makes the world’s best ribs and tater salad and because of his black ancestry he has a 50 percent longer dong than the rest of us mere mortals.

  111. ksagnostic
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 7:50 pm | Permalink

    “And they say Abe wouldn’t be a Republican today! Better study history a little harder!!”

    Boxlock, this was the opening statement of your post. It looks like a thesis sentence to me (!!).

    You later said:
    “Frankly I don’t care if ‘little Johnny down the block’ said it, as far as I’m concerned it is still
    Timeless and True!
    And that was the point anyway.”

    Uhm, no, you might agree with the statements, but you originally indicated that it spoke to Lincoln’s viewpoint and those who don’t think he would be a Republican now “better study history a little harder”.

    If you lifted that sentence from a political spam e-mail, you failed to edit it to indicate that regardless of who said it, you agreed with it.

    BTW, I don’t pretend to know whether a nineteenth century man like Lincoln would stand on modern politics, or how he would have responded to the Reverend’s words.

  112. ksagnostic
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 7:51 pm | Permalink

    “Der Jawless Fisch hat gesprochen!”

    “careful Box, Clark will go on his long list of how good looking he his, intelligent, makes the world’s best ribs and tater salad and because of his black ancestry he has a 50 percent longer dong than the rest of us mere mortals.”

    Re: Regular
    DNFTT

  113. WSClark
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 7:59 pm | Permalink

    “If not for P_mamma you would never have known.”

    Actually, I am fairly adept at using Google and Snopes. I would have found you out, but she did a great job of busting you for posting a lie.

    “you will never be an agreeable or likable human being.”

    Well, thank you! If there is one thing that I have learned in these 56 years, is that if the wrong people “like you” it is even worse than if the right people dislike you.

    You are one of the “wrong people.”

  114. WSClark
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 8:01 pm | Permalink

    “careful Box, Clark will go on his long list”

    McCluer/Regular/JM/Republican/Kansas/Republikhan/Blog Monitor/Eier is a REAL jealous guy.

    That is why he keeps inventing a new persona for himself.

    He can’t stand the “old him.”

    Ha!

  115. StevenEDavis
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 8:16 pm | Permalink

    Regular
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 2:49 pm | Permalink
    My grandmother was born in Oklahoma territory. I believe Oklahoma didn’t become a state until 1907 or something like that?
    **********

    Correct. November 16th, 1907.

    http://www.state.ok.us/osfdocs/stinfo2.html

  116. DavidB
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 8:22 pm | Permalink

    How to Speak Republican:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXk4P12p1tU

  117. Political_mama
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 8:31 pm | Permalink

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=FiQJ9Xp0xxU

    Why I’m voting Republican.

  118. American_Way
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 8:36 pm | Permalink

    ” believe Oklahoma didn’t become a state until 1907″

    So how many years until they get a good basketball team?

    Rock Chalk Jayhawks!

  119. American
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 8:51 pm | Permalink

    What about the issues with Barack Obama’s candidacy?

    “Yes, we can!”

    William Ayres?

    “Yes, we can!”

    Jeremiah Wright?

    “Yes, we can!”

    Father Michael Pfleger?

    “Yes, we can!”

    Trinity UCC?

    “Yes, we can!”

    Barack Hussein Obama?

    “Yes, we can!”

    From Chicago?

    “Yes, we can!”

    One of the most crooked democratic areas of the country?

    “Yes, we can!”

    Jim Johnson resigned?

    “Yes, we can!”

    Tony Rezko?

    “Yes, we can!”

    He hasn’t passed any legislation in the US Senate?

    “Yes, we can!”

    He is admittedly the most liberal senator in the US Senate?

    “Yes, we can!”

    He is only on his second term in the US Senate?

    “Yes, we can!”

    He has a very high number of no-votes in the Illinois Senate?

    “Yes, we can!”

    He is unapologetically pro-abortion?

    “Yes, we can!”

    He is a major supporter and endorsed by Planned parenthood?

    “Yes, we can!”

    A admitted former marijuana and cocaine user.

    “Yes, we can!”

    Half black, but seen as all black.

    “Yes, we can!”

    Sat 20 years in a pew at church and could not remember radical statements being made by his Pastor.

    “Yes, we can!”

  120. Boxlock
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:12 pm | Permalink

    WS,
    I don’t know how to tell you this with anymore more sincerity. When you say, “You are one of the “wrong people”, well…I couldn’t care less what you think.
    I don’t dismiss people lightly, as I consider it a loss for me personally to do so, but you….I simply don’t care what you think anymore. You are no one I want to be around, even in cyberspace.
    That is said not to get back at you, or to offend, it’s just fact.

  121. LR2
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:15 pm | Permalink

    You are no one I want to be around, even in cyberspace.
    That is said not to get back at you, or to offend, it’s just fact.

    … then old man why do you keep talking to him ? Now go change your depends

  122. Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:29 pm | Permalink

    Ohhhh nooooo ‘Merican is having another meltdown!!! You stuck??? or what??? BOR—ING!!!! YAAWWWN!!!

  123. Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:32 pm | Permalink

    DavidB
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 8:22 pm | Permalink
    How to Speak Republican:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXk4P12p1tU

    Political_mama
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 8:31 pm | Permalink
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=FiQJ9Xp0xxU

    Why I’m voting Republican.
    =====================================

    For some reason, those links arent working for me… They dont display a video box…

  124. American
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:35 pm | Permalink

    What about the issues with Barack Obama’s candidacy?

    “Change we can belive in!”

    William Ayres?

    “Change we can belive in!”

    Jeremiah Wright?

    “Change we can belive in!”

    Father Michael Pfleger?

    “Change we can belive in!”

    Trinity UCC?

    “Change we can belive in!”

    Barack Hussein Obama?

    “Change we can belive in!”

    From Chicago?

    “Change we can belive in!”

    One of the most crooked democratic areas of the country?

    “Change we can belive in!”

    Jim Johnson resigned?

    “Change we can belive in!”

    Tony Rezko?

    “Change we can belive in!”

    He hasn’t passed any legislation in the US Senate?

    “Change we can belive in!”

    He is admittedly the most liberal senator in the US Senate?

    “Change we can belive in!”

    He is only on his second term in the US Senate?

    “Change we can belive in!”

    He has a very high number of no-votes in the Illinois Senate?

    “Change we can belive in!”

    He is unapologetically pro-abortion?

    “Change we can belive in!”

    He is a major supporter and endorsed by Planned parenthood?

    “Change we can belive in!”

    A admitted former marijuana and cocaine user.

    “Change we can belive in!”

    Half black, but seen as all black.

    “Change we can belive in!”

    Sat 20 years in a pew at church and could not remember radical statements being made by his Pastor.

    “Change we can belive in!”

  125. WSClark
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:41 pm | Permalink

    “I simply don’t care what you think anymore. You are no one I want to be around, even in cyberspace.”

    Christ, I am touched, I’ll change my ways immediately and become a God-fearing right wing hater just like you.

    Or, maybe not.

  126. Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:42 pm | Permalink

    Boxlock
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 6:48 pm | Permalink

    * During this political season lets be reminded of these wise words.
    * You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
    * You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
    * You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.
    * You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down.
    * You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.
    * You cannot build character and courage by taking away man’s initiative and independence.
    * You cannot help men permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves.
    ======================================

    Ummmm — Errrrrr — I dont know of ANY group who is doing any of those things!!

    SPAM it is!! and only SPAM!!!

    One helluva straw man…. Build him up, and then tear him down… Only-est thing is… He is totally fictional… Must be a figment of Boxlock’s own narrow minded imagination!! ROFL!!!

  127. American_Way
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:42 pm | Permalink

    ” They dont display a video box…”

    Don’t worry about it Chas. You aren’t missing anything worthwhile. Political spoof. Funny, but not a grain of truth to it.

  128. American_Way
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:45 pm | Permalink

    Boxlock
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 6:48 pm | Permalink

    * You cannot help men permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves.

    Remember what JFK said, “Ask not what your country can do for you – but what you can do for your country.”

    I don’t believe he was talking to just the filthy rich.

    Let me add one:

    You cannot spend yourself to prosperity.

    Both parties should have learned that by now.

  129. Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:48 pm | Permalink

    ‘Merican is nothing more than a mongrel, racist bigot… And has now proven that beyond the shadow of any doubt for two days in a row!!! SHAME on ‘Merican, the Blog’s Anti-American!! You like that Swastika on your back bumper??? :-|

  130. Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:52 pm | Permalink

    Re: ‘Merican >>>>

    DNFTT or the Flaming Troll either!!

  131. American_Way
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:06 pm | Permalink

    “Boxlock
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 9:12 pm | Permalink
    WS,
    I don’t know how to tell you this with anymore more sincerity. When you say, “You are one of the “wrong people”, well…I couldn’t care less what you think.
    I don’t dismiss people lightly, as I consider it a loss for me personally to do so, but you….I simply don’t care what you think anymore. You are no one I want to be around, even in cyberspace.
    That is said not to get back at you, or to offend, it’s just fact.”

    Very well said.

  132. Monkeyhawk
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:06 pm | Permalink

    “Boxlock”

    From http://www.truthorfiction.com

    Summary of the eRumor:
    Alleged quotes from Abraham Lincoln about the poor, the weak, prosperity, workers, class hatred, and character.
    The Truth:
    These words are often attributed to Abraham Lincoln, but according to the book They Never Said it: A Book of Fake Quotes, Misquotes, & Misleading Attributions, they are not from Lincoln.

    The quotes were published in 1942 by William J. H. Boetcker, a Presbyterian minister. He released a pamphlet titled Lincoln On Limitations, which did include a Lincoln quote, but also added 10 statements written by Boetcker himself.”

  133. BlueJay
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:17 pm | Permalink

    Boxlick caught in a lie?

    Say it aint so.

  134. Boxlock
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:27 pm | Permalink

    Monkey,
    I couldn’t care a whole lot less who said it, except maybe if it were WS, I just like what it said. And, believe every line of it.
    If it was written by William J. H. Boetcker, a Presbyterian minister, that’s just fine with me.
    The whole point of posting it was the relevance of what was said, not who said it.
    And quite frankly, considering much of the audience, spending a lot of time checking authenticity of the auther seemed like a waste of time.

  135. WSClark
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:29 pm | Permalink

    “Very well said.”

    Kind of like when AmWay said that he “knew more about me” and would have the police over to arrest me for marijuana law violations.

    “Very well said” AmWay.

    Ha!

  136. DavidB
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:30 pm | Permalink

    YouTube videos:
    Videos on YouTube are streamed through an Adobe Flash player.
    More info at:wwwhelp.youtube.com/support/youtube/bin/answer.py?answer=56115&src=top5&lev=

  137. WSClark
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:30 pm | Permalink

    “And quite frankly, considering much of the audience, spending a lot of time checking authenticity of the auther seemed like a waste of time.”

    In other words, you just posted crap that had been MADE UP.

    Jeez, might you be a REPUBLICAN?

    Who wudda thunk it?

  138. Boxlock
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:30 pm | Permalink

    BlueJay, you are an imbecile.
    That was no lie, that was posting something I got because I liked what it said, and as I said, with an audience like you, why should I care about detail.
    You aren’t worth the effort.

  139. DavidB
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:34 pm | Permalink

    oops:
    http://help.youtube.com/support/youtube/bin/answer.py?answer=56115&src=top5&lev=

  140. WSClark
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:37 pm | Permalink

    In other words, you just posted crap that had been MADE UP.

  141. BlueJay
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:38 pm | Permalink

    YOU attributed words you chose to Abraham Lincoln there Boxy.

    I take personal offense at that. Abraham Lincoln was a cousin of mine. His Great Aunt was my many times great Grandmother.

    You lied. You got busted.

  142. Boxlock
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:38 pm | Permalink

    And WS is worth even less effort, he has proven himself over and over to be sub-human, a slug mentally.
    And making a issue over a forwarded email whose content was significant but attributed to the wrong author is proof of his shallow mentality.
    Everyone knows it was the content I was expressing as the subject not that Abraham Lincoln said it.

  143. DavidB
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:38 pm | Permalink

    Believe is not spelled “belive”, not even two dozen times…. whahahahhaah.

    Try this one http://www.barackobama.com/index.php to see what his campaign has to say…

  144. Monkeyhawk
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:41 pm | Permalink

    “Boxlock” squirms –

    “I couldn’t care a whole lot less who said it…”

    Which sounds a lot different from your original post, at 6:48 pm.

    “And they say Abe wouldn’t be a Republican today! Better study history a little harder!!”

    [snip fake Abraham Lincoln "quotes"]

    All I did was “study history a little harder” than you did, “Boxlock.”

    Which is to mean I did a 2.3 second Google search instead of cut-and-pasting a hoary old right-wing e-screed.

    You’ve been pwned, “Boxlock.”

    Suck it up.

  145. Boxlock
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:43 pm | Permalink

    And you are lying now BlueJay.
    You have trash for a blood line, no one of your character, who steals $1.50 bags of top soil, can be trusted to say anything truthful.
    You have no character JR, you are an embarrassment to the human race, little more than animal in nature.
    And the reason you and WS make such a issue over nothing is because you both know your character also and don’t need me to point it out.

  146. WSClark
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:44 pm | Permalink

    And Boxlock states, emphatically…..

    “And they say Abe wouldn’t be a Republican today! Better study history a little harder!!”

    And it turns out that Boxlock was lying and then he cries about being called out for it.

    Typical Republican.

  147. WSClark
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:47 pm | Permalink

    Naughty, naughty now Boxlock – you are getting really close to being belligerent. God knows what that would make you if you crossed that line.

    Just admit that you posted a lie and we will let it slide.

    Maybe.

  148. Boxlock
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:49 pm | Permalink

    Typical small minded libs that can’t discuss the value of what was said, and want to attack because of what was relatively unimportant except to a study of Abraham Lincoln.

  149. Boxlock
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:50 pm | Permalink

    Petty minds, petty people.

  150. BlueJay
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:56 pm | Permalink

    You lied Boxlock and you got caught.

    All of your posts from this point on will be suspect.

  151. Boxlock
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:59 pm | Permalink

    lie, “to make a statement that one knows is false, esp. with intent to deceive”

    http://www.yourdictionary.com/lie

    There was no attempt to deceive, the comments were attributed to the wrong person by mistake, which was not the focus of the posting.
    The shallowness of the person is proven by the shallow importance of their arguments.
    As I said, and you prove, shallow people with shallow minds.

  152. Monkeyhawk
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 11:00 pm | Permalink

    “Boxlock” –

    What was said (by you, anyway) was:

    “And they say Abe wouldn’t be a Republican today! Better study history a little harder!!”

    I simply studied “history a little harder.” (without the double exclamation marks, even)

  153. Boxlock
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 11:03 pm | Permalink

    Energy Guzzled by Al Gore’s Home in Past Year Could Power 232 U.S. Homes for a Month
    Gore’s personal electricity consumption up 10%, despite “energy-efficient” home renovations.
    http://tennesseepolicy.org/main/article.php?article_id=764
    What a hypocrite.

  154. StevenEDavis
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 11:06 pm | Permalink

    Boxlock,
    Admitting a mistake will not kill you. You got caught, admit it.

  155. BlueJay
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 11:08 pm | Permalink

    “There was no attempt to deceive, the comments were attributed to the wrong person by mistake, which was not the focus of the posting.”

    Sure it was. YOU took words that you agreed with and attributed them to someone who never said them.

    That demands an apology not a squirm.

    Man up and apologize.

  156. BlueJay
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 11:13 pm | Permalink

    Oh not good Boxy.

    You are caught in at least a BAD mistake and at most an outright lie.

    Now you wanna do a Virginia reel and pretend it didn’t happen?

  157. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 11:16 pm | Permalink

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIjGynF4qkE

  158. BlueJay
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 11:20 pm | Permalink

    I’ve been posting a long time “Boxlock”.

    I know a killer word or one that is meant as such when I see one.

    “Abraham Lincoln” was the center of your post.

    You were wrong or you are a liar. Own up.

  159. Posted June 17, 2008 at 11:25 pm | Permalink

    Anybody who has read Lincoln, or read much about Lincoln, would or should know, that Lincoln would not build up such a straw man of words such as what was purported to come from Lincoln…. Lincoln just wouldnt write anything that stupid!! LOL

  160. Posted June 17, 2008 at 11:29 pm | Permalink

    Every word of that cheap diatribe was totally lacking of charity toward anybody, and full of malice toward anybody who would read it!!

    Thats the biggest clue that it didnt come from Lincoln… the man who had charity for all, and malice toward none!!

  161. BlueJay
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 11:41 pm | Permalink

    “And you are lying now BlueJay.
    You have trash for a blood line, no one of your character, who steals $1.50 bags of top soil, can be trusted to say anything truthful.
    You have no character JR, you are an embarrassment to the human race, little more than animal in nature.”

    From a liar like you Boxy? That’s a compliment.

    I have to be careful what I post here. There are people who want to hurt or kill me trying to guess my real name here.

    You forget the history of your own country. I guess your people got here late huh?

    This country has been all about fighting “the man” and helping one another.

    If I wished, I qualify as a son of the American Revolution.

    Catch me in a lie if you can. YOU were caught in one here.

  162. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 11:42 pm | Permalink

    Boxlock posted June 17, 2008 at 6:48 pm

    “And they say Abe wouldn’t be a Republican today! Better study history a little harder!!

    ……Abraham Lincoln”
    ————

    What year of “history” Boxlock…? 1942?

    And please tell us what the last line of your post means.

    “……Abraham Lincoln”

  163. Posted June 17, 2008 at 11:54 pm | Permalink

    OMG, boxlicker got caught telling a lie and now he’s trying to poodle dance his way out of it?

    heheheheheheheheheheheheh. HEHEHEHEHEHEHEHHEH.

    HEE HEE HEE HEE HEEEEEEE….

    Since when did out right lying become a “chrisitan family value”?

    He can sure dish it out but when he gets caught, he cant even admit it.

    What a “man”. And I’m not convinced the poodle is a male.

    But hey, ya know, straight folks like poodle boy have that whole moral superiority thing going.

    And he/she is worried about gay marriage?

    Seems like he needs to work on his ten commandments. It never mentions gay marriage.

    But lying did make the top ten….

  164. Posted June 17, 2008 at 11:55 pm | Permalink

    Dance Poodle dance!

  165. ANTI
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 11:55 pm | Permalink

    KFG, I thought you were fond of a good “boxlicker”?

  166. ANTI
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 11:58 pm | Permalink

    GOOOOOOO GGGAAAAAAAAYYY! (*****Jazz Hands*****)

  167. ANTI
    Posted June 18, 2008 at 12:00 am | Permalink

    HEEE HEEE, Freaking HEEE! Get on your broom and ride!!!!

  168. Posted June 18, 2008 at 12:06 am | Permalink

    ANTI stupidly equates being Lesbian with being a “witch” >>>>>

    ANTI
    Posted June 18, 2008 at 12:00 am | Permalink
    HEEE HEEE, Freaking HEEE! Get on your broom and ride!!!!

    ANTI should be reported to the Editors…

  169. Monkeyhawk
    Posted June 18, 2008 at 12:09 am | Permalink

    As Abraham Lincoln said:

    “Boxlock” is lying scum.

    Read your history, people!!

    And, as Jesus said:

    Blessed are the weak in integrity, for that is “Boxlock’s” only hope — Matthew 29:11

    Read your Bible, people!!

    As JFK said:

    Ask not what “Boxlock” can do for you, ask what you can do for “Boxlock.”

    And here’s what we all can do for “Boxlock”:

    We can understand his idiocy. Accept it and forgive him and give us our compassion.

    And operate on his brain.

  170. BlueJay
    Posted June 18, 2008 at 12:13 am | Permalink

    Oh LOOK auntie ANTI is here.

    Originally “ANTI J R”

    My own personal stalker.

    Let’s rock.

    J R sings “View to a Kill”

  171. BlueJay
    Posted June 18, 2008 at 12:21 am | Permalink

    Well we have to forgive Boxy.

    He is having a bad day.

    In between the rants of his con masters, came news today.

    From Kansas, Utah, all over America, came gay people to California to be married.

    And they were.

    Like I said last night. America is changing. Old prejudices are dying.

    Old ideologies too.

  172. Posted June 18, 2008 at 12:21 am | Permalink

    I quite agree Monkey!!! Well, its been a long day!!! And so,

    Good night; Good luck; God bless –
    Whatever you conceive God to be!!

    Blessings ALL!!!

    So mote it be!!

  173. BlueJay
    Posted June 18, 2008 at 12:33 am | Permalink

    J R sings….

    “Hit me with your best shot. Why don’t you hit me with your best shot?

    Hit me with your best shot. Fire away!”

  174. Regular
    Posted June 18, 2008 at 12:40 am | Permalink

    Lot of energy wasted on pointing out a misquote.

    I wonder if the Whig party stayed around, we’d still be Whigs?

  175. Posted June 18, 2008 at 12:52 am | Permalink

    dance poodle anti, dance!

  176. Posted June 18, 2008 at 1:26 am | Permalink

    And Toties too!!

  177. Posted June 18, 2008 at 1:27 am | Permalink

    correction — Tories

  178. Posted June 18, 2008 at 1:49 am | Permalink

    “In 1848, the Whigs, seeing no hope of success by nominating Clay, nominated General Zachary Taylor, a Mexican-American War hero. They stopped criticizing the war and adopted no platform at all.

    Taylor defeated Democratic candidate Lewis Cass and the anti-slavery Free Soil Party, who had nominated former President Martin Van Buren.”

    Seems that the Democrats of 1848 along with the Free Soil Party, were abolitionists… Seems we have a fairly long history of a multiple Party electoral system… Wonder who it was that decided Two parties were enough?? Hmmmmm????

  179. Boxlock
    Posted June 18, 2008 at 7:42 am | Permalink

    Would you just look at the mountain being made out of a mole hill, of course it was a mistake, I already said that. It was something I received and passed on, not for WHO said it as much as WHAT it said. There was never an attempt to deceive.
    And think about it, if able to preform that function, everyone of you that think a misquote is of this major importance on this blog should simply read the crap coming out of your own mouths.
    Just exactly as I said “you are petty people with petty minds.
    Post content attributed to:
    William Boetcker
    (1873-1962) German-born Presbyterian clergyman
    Date: 1916
    Source:
    often falsely attributed to Abraham Lincoln:
    http://www.cincinnatiskeptics.org/blurbs/lincoln-cannots.html

    Get that brain dead critics, “often falsely attributed to Abraham Lincoln”, and so it was with me, I received it wrong and even did a check on Snopes which provided nothing.
    You all prove yourselves to be petty, very very petty little people of little character. You make it important because you have NOTHING of greater importance about you. But you know that, that’s why you cling to this nothing. The ONLY reason you make such a big deal out of this is because you have nothing else of importance to say, ha, because you are petty.
    Just as Regular points out, “Lot of energy wasted on pointing out a misquote.” You have nothing in your lives but petty efforts, so this is what you do.
    You are to be pitied, but you are so consistently detestable that is hard.

  180. Monkeyhawk
    Posted June 18, 2008 at 7:55 am | Permalink

    Looks like you’ve been tossing and turning all night about this, “Boxlock.”

    Good.

    Your little whining, “It was something I received and passed on, not for WHO said it as much as WHAT it said. There was never an attempt to deceive.”

    Which, of course is a lie.

    Here’s the part you wrote in your original post:

    “And they say Abe wouldn’t be a Republican today! Better study history a little harder!!”

    Had you studied your history a little harder, you would have promoted your purported esteem for “WHAT was said, not WHO said it,” with something like:

    “Hey everybody! Here’s what William Boetcker said in 1942!”

    No, “Boxlock.” You fell victim to the Logical Fallacy “Appeal to Authority.”

    The only-est reason you shared your little cut-and-past e-screed was it was Abraham Lincoln supposedly spewing boilerplate CONservative platitudes.

    Enjoy the view from atop your own petard.

  181. Boxlock
    Posted June 18, 2008 at 8:12 am | Permalink

    No nitwit that is not what happened.
    1. I slept just fine and am in fact late leaving now for appointments.
    2. That was “often falsely attributed to Abraham Lincoln”.
    3. The comment, ““And they say Abe wouldn’t be a Republican today! Better study history a little harder!!”” was a part of what I received, I did not add that as my comment.
    As I said Monkey….you are petty and have nothing of greater importance about you you occupy your time.
    I’m glad I can, with so very little effort, do so.

  182. Monkeyhawk
    Posted June 18, 2008 at 8:24 am | Permalink

    Your is a cut-and-paste intellect, “Boxlock.”

    Garbage in.

    Garbage out.

    Garbage. All the way down.

  183. Monkeyhawk
    Posted June 18, 2008 at 8:26 am | Permalink

    “Your is a cut-and-paste…”

    should be:

    “Yours is a …”

    You know that.

    But I suspect “Boxlock” is desperate this morning.

  184. American
    Posted June 18, 2008 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    Why do liberals always say “liar, liar, liar” when they do not agree with you?

    Why do liberals always call you names (i.e. bigot, racsist, mongrel) when they don’t have a cogent argument?

    For those of you who are vocabulary deficient:

    co·gent

    adjective
    1. convincing or believable by virtue of forcible, clear, or incisive presentation; telling.
    2. to the point; relevant; pertinent

  185. Posted June 18, 2008 at 1:08 pm | Permalink

    Now Boxlock knows what its like to get slammed on for posting a bummer from an email LOL Somehow it was just great for others to do the same thing when I posted one of those recently, Boxlock… All of your buddies jumped my case for a whole day over a gaffe I made with an email… You should remember that… You helped them!!!

    Karma is good!!

  186. Boxlock
    Posted June 18, 2008 at 1:51 pm | Permalink

    “The smallest of minds give the greatest concern to the smallest of subjects.” Boxlock,2008
    As demonstrated repeatedly over a simple misquote simply passed on.
    If this is the best you’ve got trying to show your relevance, you are all losers.

  187. Boxlock
    Posted June 18, 2008 at 2:21 pm | Permalink

    Monkey, you should know garbage, you are the prime example.
    For some strange reason you and the other jackels think you are handing me a whipping over simply passing on a misquote, one NOTED in fact for the frequency with which it is. Got news for you, your wrong again as usual.
    I am astounded, but shouldn’t be, by your utter shallowness and lack of character making such a big deal out of that. I in fact am keeping this up because you continue to show how immature and lacking in substance you are, and want everyone else to see it. MonkeyHawk you are a monkey, that can be made to do tricks for little reward, along with WS, Chas, kfg, and of course BlueJay is simply a $1.50 cent level thief. Don’t know how much lower a human can take themselves, but keep it up and we’ll see.

  188. Regular
    Posted June 18, 2008 at 2:24 pm | Permalink

    Good day Brother Chas!

    Cursed out any Christians today?

  189. nyctraderbb
    Posted June 27, 2008 at 9:16 pm | Permalink

    I’ve heard a lot about them, apparently it’s a real penny stock, one that could go to over 1 dollar. I’m probably going to buy $1000 worth on monday. What I love about stocks like this is there is almost no risk. But a possiblity that it could change your life if it takes off at all.

    Here is the NXHL website – http://www.nexiaholdings.com/ – NXHL – Nexia Holdings Website

    Don’t risk more than you can lose on these stocks, that’s why i’m only investing a grand.

    but if the stock goes to .05 I could make 1/4 million…Since i think i’ll get in at .0002…

    do the math, much better than slots right!!!!

    that’s the REAL American Dream…over 40,000 percent returns…don’t say “could have”, “should have”, “would have”…

    make money, be happy, period.

    Anyways…Good luck trading everyone!!!

17 Trackbacks

  1. By home business ideas on July 3, 2008 at 11:06 am

    home business ideas…

    This article reminds me of a little 8 minute film(?) I watched the other day….

  2. By Anal Sex Anal Sex Pictures Anal Sex Pregnant on July 3, 2008 at 11:06 am

    Anal Sex Anal Sex Pictures Anal Sex Pregnant…

    I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view…

  3. By Corey on July 3, 2008 at 4:59 pm

    defense message system…

    I can’t believe I missed this! I’m going to have to do some more reading me thinks….

  4. By Joseph on July 4, 2008 at 1:13 am

    Joseph…

    I always enjoy coming to this Free Mp3 Download because you offer great tips and advice for people like me who can always use a few good pointers. I will be getting my friends to pop around fairly soon….

  5. By legally eliminate debt on July 6, 2008 at 4:15 am

    legally eliminate debt…

    It sounds interesting but I am not sure that I agree with you completely….

  6. Accounting Financial Calculators Bad Credit Credit Cards…

    I didn’t agree with you first, but last paragraph makes sense for me…

  7. By Weather Forecast Air Supply Cloud on July 6, 2008 at 4:55 am

    Weather Forecast Air Supply Cloud…

    I didn’t agree with you first, but last paragraph makes sense for me…

  8. By water powered cars on July 6, 2008 at 8:04 pm

    water powered cars…

    Just the information that I need. I am so glad I found this post. Thanks :)…

  9. By S0ophia on July 7, 2008 at 2:39 am

    S0ophia…

    It would be great help if I could get some clarity on the real issues…

  10. Day Trading Market Liams Software Trading As Liamssoft…

    I didn’t agree with you first, but last paragraph makes sense for me…

  11. By online purchase valium on July 8, 2008 at 11:30 am

    valium…

    online pharmacy valium…

  12. By Living With Panic Attacks on July 8, 2008 at 11:25 pm

    Living With Panic Attacks…

    I couldn’t understand some parts of this article, but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting….

  13. By Jack on July 12, 2008 at 12:16 am

    Jack…

    I have seen many sites before and most of them do not look this good. I cannot wait to let my riends know about this site. Thanks for the excellent content….

  14. By automotive parts manager on July 13, 2008 at 6:02 pm

    automotive parts manager…

    Its very nice, i love it….

  15. By cries free of charge on July 14, 2008 at 7:56 am

    cries free of charge…

    I could not believe the amount of quality material on this site Free Mp3 Download. The site is extremely eyecatching and pulls the reader straight it, the articles are great quality and are very professionally written. I have seen too many of these si…

  16. By Teen Girls Teen Titans Raven Tiffany Teen on July 14, 2008 at 11:26 pm

    Teen Girls Teen Titans Raven Tiffany Teen…

    I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view…

  17. By Blood Pressure on July 15, 2008 at 7:32 pm

    Blood Pressure…

    nice post about this…..