“Please don’t tease me if I can’t watch”

And that from the no-life limp-wrist that spends all night making an arguement that he can’t win. Got a wife or girlfriend, whistle-dick? I didn’t think so.

“Please don’t tease me if I can’t watch”

It’s not the nasty gross disease-ridden lifestyle, it’s that you have to rub everybody’s nose in it. Do what you want in your bedroom, I just don’t want to hear about it.

Nano, could you BE more offensive? Are you 12 and dont know any better, or are you just an ordinary, garden variety bigot?

My guess is the latter.

Anything Cosmos says or posts is not credible until he can demonstrate his credentials.

Must be that cosmos considers himself to be a non credible source. :)

Did you see anything worth reading?

Unless Cosmos shows us his peer reviewed material on AGW nothing he says matters.

Imagine that, a socialist scientist who can think with his own mind and not be led around by the nose by the GORACLE.

However, P_Mom, good link re: Obama on Religion. I think it said a lot.

So why does your Almighty AGW septic God, Claude Allegre, publish(sic) his prestigious(sic) AGW scientific(sic) papers at the Canadian National Post?

And at Rush Limbaugh’s ex-employee’s website?

All bow… to the Almighty AGW septic God, Claude Allegre.

Do not question the Almighty AGW septic God Allegre’s very obvious errors, confusion, ignorance, and/or lies about AGW.

Do not question the Almighty AGW septic God Allegre’s complete lack of doing ANY credible, peer-reviewed climate science.

Any questioning of the Almighty AGW septic God Allegre will cause your eternal d@mnation.

“How many awards have you won in atmospheric science cosmos?”

The relevant question is HOW many peer-reviewed climate papers has your Almighty AGW septic God Allegre published?

ZERO.

http://www.logicalscience.com/skeptics/Claude_Allegre.html
“However, Claude Allegre has never published a single peer review paper directly related to climate change or global warming. Basically, the only material he has printed with regard to climate change is a four paragraph opinion piece on climate change in the French newspaper.”
————-

‘Regular’, go troll your moldy, old Industrial Hygiene engineering degree, and your lies somewhere else. You are very boring.

Later on, he modify it to clarify, although there might be some warming, it was insignificant compared to natural variations in climate.

Also, Dr. Allegre has done precision work on atmospheric gases and is considered ‘the’ expert on them as he did the foundation study that is still today’s standard.

So cosmos, are you saying you are more qualified that Dr. Allegre in talking about climate? I would say that Dr. Allegre has forgotten more than you ever knew cosmos.

Of course, we all know that cosmos likes to discredit internationally known and recognized scientists like Dr. Allegre.

Where is cosmos PhD and his international recognition? How many awards have you won in atmospheric science cosmos? Care to match your awards with Dr. Allegre’s?

How about science cosmos? You want to sit in the same room and discuss science with Dr. Allegre? Think you could teach him something? :)

“NASA loves Dr. Allegre btw as he has done several projects for them.”

But NOT ANY projects in CLIMATE science.

http://www.logicalscience.com/skeptics/Claude_Allegre.html
“However, if you analyze Allegre’s very brief editorial and subsequent comments a little more closely you will realize that he managed to:

1. Screw up the name of a scientific journal*
2. Claimed the glacier melt over the last few decades was due to the movement of multi-million year old mountains. An argument that Georg Hoffman calls an “obvious error” due to dramatically different time scales.
3. Misrepresent the state of the science to such an extent that the French scientific community wrote an open letter in protest
4. Misrepresent scientific literature to the point that even the authors of the very papers Allegre cited were crying foul.
5. Claim climate models predict warming on the South Pole when in fact they do not.
6. Leave clues about a possible political motive “

All you have to do is meet me. You can tell me you wish I was dead in person.

By our email exchange, I know you are leery of groups. Would you care to have lunch with Steven, linda and I? I can set that up.

Of course, if you decline, that WOULD form a basis of opinion here.

You have one of my emails. You may feel free to contact me.

* The National Post, a right-wing Canadian newspaper.

* Oklahoma’s Senator Inhofe’s website, written by an ex-employee of Rush Limbaugh.

* The book and right-wing websites of the agricultural economist Dennis Avery, who believes that organic food is more dangerous than food grown with chemical pesticides.

* And various think(sic) tanks that get funding from right-wing, and fossil-fuel groups.

And remember… do NOT question the Almighty AGW septic Gods, because it will result in your eternal d@mnation.

Blessings ALL!! Especially on this Blog!!

So mote it be!!

http://www.justsaynodeal.com

Do not question the Almighty God Allegre’s very obvious errors, confusion, ignorance, and/or lies about AGW.

Do not question the Almighty God Allegre’s complete lack of doing ANY credible, peer-reviewed climate science.

Any questioning of the Almighty God Allegre is guaranteed to cause your eternal d@ mnation.

So, what understanding do you want to REACH here?

And are you speaking for McCluer or just yourself?

Oh, please note McCluer’s post just prior to yours.

That’s your buddy?

Damn.

“I’d be happy to see an end to “Regular” and “WS Clark”.

I don’t have any convincing evidence they are not the same sick person.”
———–

I guess that Bluejay would also “be happy to see an end to” me.

BlueJay posted,

“Are you another nic of WS there “cosmos”? “