McCain needs to make nice to farmers

brownmccainA Bloomberg article by former Eagle reporter Alan Bjerga examined the low regard for John McCain among many farmers and agricultural interests, and how that might help Barack Obama (who represents Illinois, No. 3 among ag states). McCain voted against the farm bill in 2002 and also opposed the latest one, calling it “corporate welfare” (neither he nor Obama were present for the original vote). McCain champion Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., said McCain can attract rural voters by other means. “It’s problematic, but it’s something he can well overcome,” Brownback said. “You overcome it on values.”

102 Comments

  1. CelticKin
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 6:16 am | Permalink

    “McCain needs to make nice to farmers” and he probably will until he doesn’t anymore, and then does again.

    McCain will work anyone and any angle to get what he wants. In the end he’ll settle with Big Oil and the religious right, just like George W. Bush – to the continued ruin of ordinary Americans.

  2. Kelly
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 7:02 am | Permalink

    Make Sammy your VP candidate, That will solve your problems with farmers, evangelists . . . and will ensure your defeat. Damn, I didn’t want to say that, did I? Do you think McCain is watching?

  3. writerdog
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 7:17 am | Permalink

    The only credit I give Brownback is of all the Kansas reps he does seem to give better speeches on the floor and in committees. OK the Snowflake one was a bit weird and sounded more like one given by an Expert on space alien insemination. McCain does seem to make some strange bedfellows, Brownback, Lieberman and the like. Since Hagel said he would consider being Obama’s running mate, maybe McCain should ask Clinton to be his. Strange bedfellows in deed…

  4. lindainks55
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 8:32 am | Permalink

    “It’s problematic, but it’s something he can well overcome,” Brownback said. “You overcome it on values.”

    ————

    What values?

    bomb, bomb, bomb Iran IS A VALUE?

    Calling your wife a c**t in public IS A VALUE?

    Being the ?man? who didn’t stick by the woman who stuck by her man IS A VALUE?

    Being against bush tax cuts as a Senator and for them as a candidate IS A VALUE?

    Which evangelical ?leader? is he running after for an endorsement now? Is his judgment this poor in all decisions? Will he always seek out advice from the worst and only afterward use the excuse of not knowing. So being a poor judge of character and a dupe makes him presidential material?

    This man has no values. He runs from each stated and deeply held conviction the second someone needs him to embrace a different deeply held conviction. He is morally bankrupt, intellectually weak and tries to make being a prisoner of war a qualification for the presidency — all the while advocating torture of prisoners.

    Focus the cameras on him, never turn off the microphones. America needs to hear from him and see him often! He will be his own undoing.

  5. outlander
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 8:39 am | Permalink

    Linda: Would you please tell us the source of the McCain “c*nt” quote? As a fair-minded person, I’m sure that you would have a reliable one nailed down before you would repeat it. Thank you.

  6. lindainks55
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 8:44 am | Permalink

    The source I’ve seen has been posted and reposted. You choose to hold it unreliable. I’ll go with where there’s smoke there is fire on this one.

    Can you prove it isn’t accurate? Until you can, there are two sides to the story and we’re on different sides with no “definitive / absolute” proof for either.

  7. Posted June 22, 2008 at 8:46 am | Permalink

    Geez outie, HOW many times has that been posted? A bunch I think is the technical term. But you insist on debating it every time. I guess “hard headed” is a mild description of your state of denial.

    But back to the subject…

    I HATE the on-line version of the Salina Journal, but they do have some great articles and editorials. They are much more in tune with preserving the Kansas natural resourses than the WE.

    I know this is “just” an editorial, but the guy makes some great points. He’s catching on.

    And the “farm” bill, (more like the corporate welfare bill) he voted against had subsidies in it for fruit and veggie growers. IF only they were for SMALL fruit and veggie growers. And for encouraging more and better farmers markets.

    Ya know, the old ASC offices, now calls FSA offices, actually DISCOURAGE and forbid in some cases the changing of crops. More “freedom to farm”. THAT is why you see the same crops year after year after year. You think government doesnt CURRENTLY control all aspects of agriculture? Talk about a nationalized industry…

    Anyway, here’s a link to a GREAT editorial today about a new way of farming. Enjoy.

    http://www.saljournal.com/rdnews/story/Columngdf-for-SUNDAY2008-06-22T03-09-35

  8. outlander
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 8:51 am | Permalink

    I know kfg. If it is posted enough times, it is the truth. nk you.

    Did you know that Obama’s pet name for his wife is “M-bitch”. Yup. I got it from three unnamed guys who heard it, but won’t go on the record. but believe me, it’s true.

  9. outlander
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 8:53 am | Permalink

    Why would a guy like Obama call his wife that name? It’s disgusting. Hd has no respect for women.

  10. Posted June 22, 2008 at 8:58 am | Permalink

    “McCain champion Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., said McCain can attract rural voters by other means. “It’s problematic, but it’s something he can well overcome,” Brownback said. “You overcome it on values.”

    Sounds to me like sammy reads Thomas Frank. That quote just proves how correct Frank is in “What’s the Matter With Kansas?”.

    Sammy thinks farmers will vote against their own economic interests based on antiabortion, antigay marriage, antianything that doesnt come out of their preacher’s um, mouth.

    And sadly, he’s correct. But then, some of us have said Thomas Frank was correct all along.

    I just didnt know sammy agreed too!

  11. Posted June 22, 2008 at 9:01 am | Permalink

    De-Nile, it’s not just a river in Egypt anymore!

    So if Linda posts it one more time, will THAT make it true? Seems to me YOU need the multiple postings, not us.

    We believed it the first time the sources were posted.

  12. lindainks55
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 9:02 am | Permalink

    outlander, I think other proofs of McCain’s lack of character are evident. I easily see a pattern of abusive behavior in him. I’ve never seen an indication he truly cares about anyone or anything as much as his own ambitions for power.

    Plus, I see no experience or skills that would qualify him for president. I know many make comparisons of him being the one with experience and Obama the one without. I see neither of them high on the experience end but have more trust that Obama is intelligent enough to seek out advice and make careful decisions. McCain seems too much like bush in his arrogancy and too much the warmonger to make any careful or measured decisions. Obama has shown much greater diplomatic skills. I find that very valuable and a presidential trait I admire!

  13. Posted June 22, 2008 at 9:02 am | Permalink

    …and besides, no matter what the truth, outie wouldnt vote for obama under any circumstances.

    So…as Pmom would say… WTFE!

  14. lindainks55
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 9:07 am | Permalink

    Maybe when McCain or any of his supporters show something positive about him and his proposed policies there will be something to consider.

    He plans to continue the war in Iraq until its won but can’t tell us what will be won, when we’ll know its won… Same ole, same ole. I vote against that!

    He plans to continue the bush economic plan. I vote against that!

    What else? What are voters considering? What are his plans and policies?

  15. JMWalker
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 9:09 am | Permalink

    Let’s see: major agro-business sends major bucks to politicians in the hopes of getting favorable laws and welfare. Minor farmers send, what, chicken feed in comparison? Which one is Washington going to listen to? So, who has bought whom? (Rhetorical question for those who don’t know)

  16. BlueJay
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 9:11 am | Permalink

    STELLAR post linda!

    I’m gonna shake your hand in person.

    (Don’t worry that it is lost on outlander. He’s not of this world. He told me so in person.)

  17. Monkeyhawk
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 9:11 am | Permalink

    “lindainks55″ –

    John Sidney McCain the Third (for Shrub’s 3rd term) promises to chase away kids who play on the White House lawn!

  18. lindainks55
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 9:27 am | Permalink

    “I’m gonna shake your hand in person.”

    Well, I’m a hugger! So after you shake my hand get ready for a hug! ;-)

  19. outlander
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 9:48 am | Permalink

    I have to now apologize for my previous post about Obama’s pet name for his wife. I realize now that posting something awful about someone based on anonymous sources is wrong. I was just as bad as those folks who repeated an awful story about John McCain, based on anonymous sources.

    If I’m going to rely on someone and repeat what they say, I have to know who they are so that I can determine if they are trustworthy or have an agenda.

  20. Mary_Caruso
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 9:53 am | Permalink

    Well, don’t forget he is in favor of an $.18 price break in gas to help us all out for a few months…I know that will make a HUGE difference in my life..never mind that the government will lose a bunch in gas tax revenue…these are the sort of bandaid solutions we need to totally turn around the downhill economic slide we’re all on.
    Just goes to show how out of touch he really is with the working class.

  21. outlander
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 9:54 am | Permalink

    …or if they even exist

  22. KansasNative
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 10:01 am | Permalink

    You can save as much as 15 cents a gallon with a plus card at Dillons.

  23. Mary_Caruso
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 10:12 am | Permalink

    There you go…problem solved!

  24. Posted June 22, 2008 at 10:15 am | Permalink

    Linda — Re: Outlander…

    DNFTT — The way he phrased his question… As if he has been hibernating all this time… is a dead give-away of Trollish behavior… and shoot, it isnt even Noon yet!!

  25. Posted June 22, 2008 at 10:31 am | Permalink

    Here’s a Link >>>>

    drudge.com/news/106692/author-mccain-called-wife-c**t-trollop

  26. Posted June 22, 2008 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    You gotta fill in the blanks for the ** since WEBlog wont let the word be posted…

    Use a different browser window… also add http://www. in front of the URL…

  27. littlejohn
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    I have no love of mcCain, but still.

    A single bookwriter makes the allegation, and it was supposedly heard by “others” and it’s a fact?

    Just because you want it to be true doesn’t make it so.

    How many women claimed CLinton raped them? Did you believe any of them? Thought not.

  28. Posted June 22, 2008 at 11:05 am | Permalink

    I dont believe Obama is a Muslim either… Doesnt stop the Right Wing-nuts from posting that nearly every day…

    McCain’s abusive language toward his wife has been highly posted, and reported… It’s not like somebody said the sky is chartrues or something…

  29. Posted June 22, 2008 at 11:10 am | Permalink

    L J — Here’s another report >>>>

    http://rawstory.com/news/2008/McCain_temper_boiled_over_in_92_0407.html

  30. DavidB
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 11:11 am | Permalink

    How on Earth (Swiftboat) can anyone think (Obama is a secret Muslim) that repeating a lie (Won’t hold hand over heart) works in this (Attended a Madrassa) and (Hussein Hussein Hussein) modern internet era?

  31. Posted June 22, 2008 at 11:12 am | Permalink

    BTW, L J — I would rather that it not be true… I mean, I didnt make it up!!

  32. Posted June 22, 2008 at 11:13 am | Permalink

    Dont know DavidB… But its all over talk radio every day, ad nauseum!! Hannity loves that Crap!! LOL

  33. Phantom
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 12:00 pm | Permalink

    Here’s a couple of comments I posted on opinion line comments:
    In response to Sen. Roberts comment today regarding whether the tanker reversal “…change we can believe in”, only if you show leadership for your state and country and write a bill negating the McCain Ammendment you voted for which ties the hands of the Air Force!

    Posted by: Phantom

    6/22/2008 11:56 AM
    27890.33 Report as Violation

    Avg 5.00, 1 vote

    It was refreshing seeing Sen. Brownbacks statement today that opposition by farmers to McCain can be overcome by playing the Values Card! Only in Kansas is it effective to use the values of your constituents to screw them in their pocketbook

  34. Phantom
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 12:07 pm | Permalink

    How difficult would it have been for McCain to have stated “Let me put that cruel unfounded rumor to rest, I did not call my wife that name at a public forum”, instead of going around the horns and saying ‘This is a family forum and we don’t talk like that’ or some such b.s.

  35. littlejohn
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 12:10 pm | Permalink

    Chas
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 11:12 am | Permalink
    BTW, L J — I would rather that it not be true… I mean, I didnt make it up!!:”

    Never claimed you did.

  36. Regular
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 12:11 pm | Permalink

    I think duh Libs are trying to hold McCain to a much higher standard than they do for themselves. The tirade of words here and I imagine even more in real life by duh Libs probably makes McCain’s supposed comment pale in comparison.

    Hypocrites

  37. WSClark
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 12:18 pm | Permalink

    “How many women claimed CLinton raped them?”

    One. Juanita Broaddrick, and she couldn’t even remember what MONTH it supposedly was. Her (then) husband could not remember her having facial cuts or bruises as she claim Clinton inflicted. She was also having an affair with another man at the time of the supposed “incident.”

    Zip credibility.

  38. WSClark
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 12:22 pm | Permalink

    “to a much higher standard than they do for themselves.”

    We’re not running for president.

  39. Regular
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 12:25 pm | Permalink

    #
    WSClark
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 12:22 pm | Permalink

    “to a much higher standard than they do for themselves.”

    We’re not running for president.
    ——————
    You’re not nominating someone for sainthood.

  40. okobserver
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 12:26 pm | Permalink

    Chas
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 11:05 am | Permalink
    I dont believe Obama is a Muslim either… Doesnt stop the Right Wing-nuts from posting that nearly every day…

    McCain’s abusive language toward his wife has been highly posted, and reported… It’s not like somebody said the sky is chartrues or something…
    ———-
    I have heard you and Political Mama say this several times. I have never heard it on tv or radio and I haven’t seen it in print except here. Can you post a link that show this is true. I really want to see the proof. I would be disappointed if it is true. That link you gave upthread is bogus as you probably knew.
    ———————
    WSClark
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 12:18 pm | Permalink
    “How many women claimed CLinton raped them?”

    One. Juanita Broaddrick, and she couldn’t even remember what MONTH it supposedly was. Her (then) husband could not remember her having facial cuts or bruises as she claim Clinton inflicted. She was also having an affair with another man at the time of the supposed “incident.”

    Zip credibility
    ———————–
    What hat did you pull this one out of. I remember reading a little about this when it was first reported. Don’t ever remember seeing what you are saying. Can you post your source for this statement?

    ——————–

  41. Phantom
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 12:46 pm | Permalink

    Me thinks Regular has made a feeble attempt to re-direct the topic, well maybe not so feeble!

  42. Phantom
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 12:49 pm | Permalink

    You can sure tell which Senator isn’t up for re-election, he can speak frankly (Thomas Frank ly), careful Brownback, your contempt for your hay seed constituents is showing! Must think they are too dumb to understand what he said, and sadly, he may well be right!

  43. lindainks55
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 1:02 pm | Permalink

    A link some choose not to believe has been provided. None discounting the statement has been provided. i do understand the unwritten rules of bringing evidence (make the claim and support it). Seems that has been done and until there is anything that shows otherwise nothing more is required. We’re back to two sides to a story that some believe and some don’t. I would look at whatever might be brought showing it not true.

  44. Posted June 22, 2008 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Linda — OKOB is just doing her/his usual TROLLING routine, by asking for links when links have been provided… TWO of them even… from TWO different web sites… one web site from a very conservative web site… Sorry OKOB… try phishing somewhere else… Otherwise, provide a link of your own… I have heard this story MANY times, and it is NOT new to the Blog either… Sorry, you dont read so good!! LOL

  45. Regular
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 1:11 pm | Permalink

    #
    lindainks55
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 1:02 pm | Permalink

    A link some choose not to believe has been provided. None discounting the statement has been provided. i do understand the unwritten rules of bringing evidence (make the claim and support it). Seems that has been done and until there is anything that shows otherwise nothing more is required. We’re back to two sides to a story that some believe and some don’t. I would look at whatever might be brought showing it not true.
    ————————————-

    Proving something not true.

    How can you prove that someone said something at one moment in their life without having a voice recording?

    Even a video where lips could be read. Or is it the British pronunciation of the word “can’t” that is being seen. (kawnt)

    I would say the Libs that provided some mysterious link from a suspect source are as full of beans as the supposed claim.

    Either way, it’s low ball tactics and of course not too far from the path of the same Libs who mock our soldiers and bash Christians, then talk about tolerance in the same tainted breath.

    Hypocrites

  46. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

    multi-nic’d ‘Regular’,

    And where are your Justice Dept. and Congressional links supporting your (invalid) claim that the Sierra Club “screwed” the New Orleans levees?

  47. Regular
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 1:29 pm | Permalink

    I see that cosmos is off and running (his mouth) once again.

    Odds are, ksagnostic won’t say one thing to cosmos about snipe trolling. He might though, being as I brought it up.

    cosmos, whose 90 percent of his posts involve ad hominem and name calling.

    No wonder no one thinks none of cosmos’s post are credible. cosmos is his own worst enemy.

  48. okobserver
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 1:29 pm | Permalink

    Linda I have spent considerable time trying to find anything concrete on this accusation and found nothing. Pardon me for not believing a non supported at attempting to blemish the reputation of a presidential candidate. I would require the same from someone trying to tarnish Obama.

    Chas you are a simpleton and a buffoon. Please do not respond to or about my post and then you and I won’t have to visit about accuracy of posts.

    In other words instead of talking about a poster show the proof of what you post. It’s that simple.

  49. Regular
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 1:33 pm | Permalink

    #
    cosmos_originally
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

    multi-nic’d ‘Regular’,

    And where are your Justice Dept. and Congressional links supporting your (invalid) claim that the Sierra Club “screwed” the New Orleans levees?
    ——————-
    Since cosmos saw fit to ruin this thread, I’ll oblige him.

    I’ve posted several sources several times cosmos.

    cosmos is indeed Theodore Kaczynski the stalking unabomber reincarnated.

    This topic on the Sierra Club and New Orleans is almost two years old now and cosmos keeps bringing it up.

    Can someone say cosmos is legally insane and self-possessed maniac? I can and cosmos is all of that.

  50. okobserver
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 1:42 pm | Permalink

    Thanks regular. I thought I had dropped int a time warp with this cosmos. Your explanation makes lots more sense.

    This man/woman needs help.

  51. Posted June 22, 2008 at 1:45 pm | Permalink

    OKOB — posts have been listed… links shown… Nobody said you have to believe it, but please refrain from trying to threaten me… it wont work, dumbkopf!! TROLL!!

  52. Regular
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 1:49 pm | Permalink

    okobserver,

    Call cosmos Sammy, (Sammy Wilson.) That’s what he had on his blog sign in awhile back.

    Whether it is his name or not, it appears to annoy him when used.

    So Sammy the “cosmos freak show” puts on his daily display of Goregasms and ejaculates his broken record spew in all topics regardless whether it’s on topic or not.

    Some one take Sammy the cosmos out and tie him to a tree far away, he’s worse than a yapping and howling dog late at night.

  53. Phantom
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 1:50 pm | Permalink

    I really don’t understand why you all indulge these trolls, trying to provide links that they will not accept (and, it doesn’t really matter how credible the source).
    I think you’all are being played.

  54. lindainks55
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 1:55 pm | Permalink

    Why does McCain not respond to the accusation? Why does he not put it down once and for all, go on record against it? I’ve heard Obama address untrue rumors about himself. Even tho there are those who still believe he is a Muslim he addressed the rumor, he said he isn’t. Why won’t McCain address this?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOl4iT46Eec&feature=related

  55. Regular
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 2:00 pm | Permalink

    #
    lindainks55
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 1:55 pm | Permalink

    Why does McCain not respond to the accusation? Why does he not put it down once and for all, go on record against it? I’ve heard Obama address untrue rumors about himself. Even tho there are those who still believe he is a Muslim he addressed the rumor, he said he isn’t. Why won’t McCain address this?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOl4iT46Eec&feature=related
    ———————–
    Because it is irrelevant and part McCain’s private life if it indeed occur?

    How many in this forum have called their spouse a name that they latter regretted? I’m sure all have.

    One thing about Libs, is that don’t like to forgive and forget.

    This will be their undoing in the end.

  56. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 2:03 pm | Permalink

    Phantom,

    It’s kinda fun watching the multi-nic’d ‘Regular’ go into rabid, wild arm flailing, when I ask him to produce his Justice Dept. and Congressional links, that do NOT exist.

  57. Regular
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 2:06 pm | Permalink

    #
    cosmos_originally
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 2:03 pm | Permalink

    Phantom,

    It’s kinda fun watching the multi-nic’d ‘Regular’ go into rabid, wild arm flailing, when I ask him to produce his Justice Dept. and Congressional links, that do NOT exist.
    ——————-
    Which I have posted several times and you just ignored them.

    Besides Sammy aka “Theodore Kaczynski” unabomber, cosmos, this is from a topic we discussed two years ago.

    You are depraved and don’t have all your oars in the water Sammy.

  58. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 2:13 pm | Permalink

    Lie, and flail your arms wildly, multi-nic’d ‘Regular’. LOL!

  59. okobserver
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 2:14 pm | Permalink

    Linda even you have to recognize how out of place that question was. The audience agreed with the classy way he handled it.

    Next will he be asked when he quit beating his wife?

    That is evidence he said it? That is evidence there are jerks in every audience such as the one who asked Hillary to go iron his shirts.

    Evidence is something that is proven beyond a shadow of doubt to be true. What do the libs eat for breakfast? Do you all eat the same cereal? There has to be a causation here somewhere?

  60. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 2:14 pm | Permalink

    http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/mccain-needs-to-make-nice-to-farmers/#comment-372522

  61. lindainks55
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 2:18 pm | Permalink

    It is relevant to me. And it’s purported to have happened in public, not private. In fact, I wonder what he does privately if he can do this publicly!? He is by choice a public person and that makes his words and deeds public.

    I always wanted Kerry to come out and address the accusations the Swiftboaters made. It left a question when one didn’t decisively deal with it.

    Sure glad Obama isn’t leaving things unaddressed.

    I will continue to believe McCain did call his wife a c**t and a trollop in public. My opinion is that he should address it in an attempt to squelch the questions and the rumors if that’s what they are.

    Some share my opinion.

  62. Regular
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 2:31 pm | Permalink

    Okay lindainks,

    The other day someone said your husband called you a “two bit whore and a c##t” in public.

    Prove it’s not true.

  63. outlander
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 2:39 pm | Permalink

    “Why does McCain not respond to the accusation? Why does he not put it down once and for all, go on record against it? I’ve heard Obama address untrue rumors about himself.”

    ————-

    Linda, you ever heard of not dignifying an accusation with a response? Anonymous sources? C’mon. I really thought you held yourself to a higher standard. Live and learn, I guess. You have apparently been hanging around here too long because a few of the lying “ends justify the means” libs have rubbed off on you.

  64. littlejohn
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 2:50 pm | Permalink

    “I will continue to believe McCain did call his wife a c**t and a trollop in public. My opinion is that he should address it in an attempt to squelch the questions and the rumors if that’s what they are.”

    I don;t know whether or not to believe it. One source willing to go public doesn;t make it so. However, I agree, he should address it. Period. If it continues to not address, whether or not it is really true will not matter, what will matter is that people believe it to be true.

  65. lindainks55
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 2:52 pm | Permalink

    He didn’t. If he knew he had been accused of such he would say he didn’t too. And you could still believe he did, but he would have addressed the accusation.

  66. Regular
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    #
    lindainks55
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 2:52 pm | Permalink

    He didn’t. If he knew he had been accused of such he would say he didn’t too. And you could still believe he did, but he would have addressed the accusation.
    ———————–
    So you are saying your husband lies then.

    It was from supposed extremely reliable sources that heard your husband say these things.

  67. lindainks55
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 2:55 pm | Permalink

    I have heard of not dignifying with a response. Do it myself right here. There are posters I don’t want to interact with. Of course, I’m not running for public office so it’s not quite an apples to apples comparison.

  68. outlander
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 2:56 pm | Permalink

    LJ: I disagree. Should every made up rumor from anonymous sources be addressed? I’m sure the libs, who have no reluctance to make stuff up (the end justifies the means) would have no problem making that a full time job for him.

    But what bothers me more is the posters here who will state it as if it’s a fact when they have NO ONE who will even admit to hearing it.

  69. lindainks55
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    Guess I’m not smart enough to follow your logic of my husband addressing an accusation making him a liar. Sorry. I thought all I said was if accused he would address it and deny it. Then you would have heard from both his accuser and himself and still have the right to your opinion. He however wouldn’t have left the accusation unaddressed.

  70. Regular
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    #
    lindainks55
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    Guess I’m not smart enough to follow your logic of my husband addressing an accusation making him a liar. Sorry. I thought all I said was if accused he would address it and deny it. Then you would have heard from both his accuser and himself and still have the right to your opinion. He however wouldn’t have left the accusation unaddressed.
    —————————–
    Of course your husband would lie about making those comments.

    It still doesn’t mean he didn’t make them just because he addressed it by stating a lie.

    So as long as your husband lies addressing the issue, then everything is okay, right?

  71. lindainks55
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 3:07 pm | Permalink

    outlander, I don’t think every rumor needs to be addressed. This one has grown legs since it first appeared in a book. I would think once it becomes widely known the public person might consider addressing it publicly. I think Obama tried to ignore the words that were cherry picked from his pastor’s sermons. He first explained he didn’t ever hear such from Pator Wright. Choose to address it further when it grew legs. There are still accusations made. He did however address them. Didn’t stop them, but he is on record.

    Obama also addressed publicly the emails about him being Muslim, about his patriotism both in not wearing a flag pin on his lapel and not putting his hand over his heart for the flag salute. Still didn’t stop the rumors but again he is on record.

    I’m glad he addresses those rumors. Anytime the accusation is made here we can go find his words and bring them here too. Leaves everyone at an impasse.

    If McCain chooses not to address the accusation (a pretty serious one in my book!) I will continue to think there is a reason why he doesn’t and among those reasons is that he might be caught in a lie of he denounces this. That would make two strikes against him.

    If it isn’t true he ought to be able to say it isn’t.

  72. WSClark
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 3:07 pm | Permalink

    Jeez, the Republicans are crying about attacks!?!?!

    The Party of Karl Rove is whining about false accusations, innuendos and outright lies?

  73. lindainks55
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 3:12 pm | Permalink

    going back and forth and posts crossing. Makes me dizzy. ;-)

    Someone is lying and I’m sure there will always be two sides to most every story. Shoot, I’ve heard two sides when we red the same words and coming from different perspectives come to different conclusions.

    I would want to be on record of denouncing the accusation. If some choose to continue believing my accuser thee wouldn’t be anything I could do about that. There might however be some who would reconsider and maybe change their opinions. Maybe not, maybe none would but I would have tried. Always worth trying if you’re on the side of truth is my opinion.

  74. lindainks55
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 3:12 pm | Permalink

    *when we READ the same words

  75. KansasNative
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 3:18 pm | Permalink

    Sen. Sherrod Brown (Ohio) told the crowd a McCain presidency would be a “third term for George Bush.”

    He criticized the Republican nominee for visiting Ottawa, Canada, on Saturday rather than Ottawa, Ohio – where the state has seen economic hardship and lost jobs. Brown said McCain is out of touch with Ohio voters.
    _______________________________

    Perhaps McShame can figure out what country is in by election day.

  76. lindainks55
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 3:23 pm | Permalink

    These accusations are not ALL coming from anonymous sources. Many are willing to be identified. If someone wrote such in a book I would be considering libel charges if I had the truth on my side!
    ——————

    “The Real McCain by Cliff Schecter, which will arrive in bookstores next month, reports an angry exchange between McCain and his wife that happened in full view of aides and reporters during a 1992 campaign stop. An advance copy of the book was obtained by RAW STORY.”

    Three reporters from Arizona, on the condition of anonymity, also let me in on another incident involving McCain’s intemperateness. In his 1992 Senate bid, McCain was joined on the campaign trail by his wife, Cindy, as well as campaign aide Doug Cole and consultant Wes Gullett. At one point, Cindy playfully twirled McCain’s hair and said, ‘You’re getting a little thin up there.’ McCain’s face reddened, and he responded, ‘At least I don’t plaster on the makeup like a trollop, you c unt.’ McCain’s excuse was that it had been a long day. If elected president of the United States, McCain would have many long days.

    “The man who was known as ‘McNasty’ in high school has erupted in foul-languaged tirades at political foes and congressional colleagues more-or-less throughout his career, and his quickness to anger has been an issue on the presidential campaign trail as evidence of his fury has surfaced.

    “In the book [Schecter] outlines several other examples of McCain loosing his cool and raises the question of how that would affect a McCain presidency.”

  77. KansasNative
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 3:27 pm | Permalink

    I don’t know what all the fuss is about. Cindy McShame IS a c***.

    Sydney was just speaking the truth.

  78. Posted June 22, 2008 at 4:20 pm | Permalink

    Clark — It has to do with FOUR letters in the middle of Lee’s last name that the censor spotted… :-)

  79. Posted June 22, 2008 at 4:23 pm | Permalink

    Now, now, Native — Maybe she is, but McSame shouldnt say those things in public… even if OKOB doesnt believe it was said… LOL OKOB barely believes in the full moon!!

  80. Posted June 22, 2008 at 4:24 pm | Permalink

    “OKOB barely believes in the full moon!!”

    However, I reserve the right to be wrong on that statement… perhaps he/she does NOT believe in the full moon!! Who knows with some of these posters now days…

  81. Regular
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 4:33 pm | Permalink

    “In the book [Schecter] outlines several other examples of McCain loosing his cool and raises the question of how that would affect a McCain presidency.”
    ===========================
    FDR was know for his profane outbursts. So what’s your point?

  82. WSClark
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

    “FDR was know for his profane outbursts.”

    Dang, I didn’t know that he called Eleanor a c@nt!

  83. lindainks55
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    Different times, Regular. Nowadays we hear much about family values and other such moralistic attributes (abortion, same-sex marriage…). These words are usually used to hint that evil liberals have no values (family or otherwise) and conservatives are the party of God. Ever since the Contract With America and trying to use Clinton’s lack of morals politically the Republican Party has attempted to hold themselves to a higher standard. Tried to inject government where it never was and in my opinion doesn’t belong.

    We know that we’re all people regardless of our political persuasions — warts and all, faults a plenty, and there is no party more moral than another. We probably do know that in reality. But leaders of the Republican Party have tried to make the party stand for something more wholesome than human. There are despots in every party, every occupation, every walk of life. There are also honorable, moral, wise people from every party, occupation, walk of life.

    Today we snarl the titles that used to both be honorable and use them as attacks against each other. Somebody must be a loser. partisanship holds us all hostage.

    The words liberal and conservative have even taken on new meanings since the days of FDR. Not long ago conservative stood for things I firmly believe in — fiscal responsibility and as little government intervention as possible. Social issues weren’t even part of the definition. Today the neocons and the social conservatives are a more vocal part of the party. Are they a stronger part? I think we’re getting closer to finding out. Seems to me the old time conservatives are waiting for the new ones to hang themselves with all that rope they’ve been given before they move back in and restore sanity. Anyway that’s another of my hopes for our country’s tomorrow.

  84. Regular
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    #
    lindainks55
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    Different times, Regular. Nowadays we hear much about family values and other such moralistic attributes (abortion, same-sex marriage…). These words are usually used to hint that evil liberals have no values (family or otherwise) and conservatives are the party of God. Ever since the Contract With America and trying to use Clinton’s lack of morals politically the Republican Party has attempted to hold themselves to a higher standard. Tried to inject government where it never was and in my opinion doesn’t belong.

    We know that we’re all people regardless of our political persuasions — warts and all, faults a plenty, and there is no party more moral than another. We probably do know that in reality. But leaders of the Republican Party have tried to make the party stand for something more wholesome than human. There are despots in every party, every occupation, every walk of life. There are also honorable, moral, wise people from every party, occupation, walk of life.

    Today we snarl the titles that used to both be honorable and use them as attacks against each other. Somebody must be a loser. partisanship holds us all hostage.

    The words liberal and conservative have even taken on new meanings since the days of FDR. Not long ago conservative stood for things I firmly believe in — fiscal responsibility and as little government intervention as possible. Social issues weren’t even part of the definition. Today the neocons and the social conservatives are a more vocal part of the party. Are they a stronger part? I think we’re getting closer to finding out. Seems to me the old time conservatives are waiting for the new ones to hang themselves with all that rope they’ve been given before they move back in and restore sanity. Anyway that’s another of my hopes for our country’s tomorrow.
    —————————————–
    Actually, both of my grandparents were Democrats and Conservative. On my father’s side, it was the first break from Republican since the Civil War. I think because they were both farmers, but unsure for the reason, didn’t really care at the time.

    It’s the Liberal mantra that is the downfall of the Democratic Party, they need to distance themselves from it entirely.

    If Liberals want to be Liberals, join the Independent party. The modern day Progressive Liberals has left permanent stains on a once moderate party of Democrats.

  85. Posted June 22, 2008 at 5:09 pm | Permalink

    Hold on, the Farm Bill would have ended the Enron Loophole which allows energy traders to manipulate the market and gouge consumers. McCain, Tiahrt and the other corrupt Republicans who voted against the bill were just protecting their corporate overlords.

  86. Monkeyhawk
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 5:39 pm | Permalink

    From “The Guardian” –

    http://tinyurl.com/3l4gkc

    “[McCain's] public outbursts, and many other private ones, have concerned people even in his own party. Former New Hampshire Republican Senator Robert Smith publicly voiced his concerns, once saying McCain’s temper ‘ … would place this country at risk in international affairs, and the world perhaps in danger’. That sentiment was echoed by Mississippi Republican Senator Thad Cochran, who told a Boston newspaper: ‘The thought of his being president sends a cold chill down my spine. He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and he worries me.’

    Like the time he threatened to beat up 90-something-year old Strom Thurmond! The guy whose classmates called him “McNasty.”

    Calling his trollop wife a c*nt seems to have been one of his more endearing moments.

  87. ksagnostic
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 6:09 pm | Permalink

    Without feeding the troll directly…

    “multi-nic’d ‘Regular’,

    “And where are your Justice Dept. and Congressional links supporting your (invalid) claim that the Sierra Club ’screwed’ the New Orleans levees?”

    To observers:

    Where is the ad hominum here? The multi-nic’d is, to those unfamiliar with history here, literally true, Regular did post under multiple nics and at times denied in a subsequent nic that a previous nic was him. The rest is a request to substantiate a previous allegation in light of new ones. I would be the first to agree that cosmos can be a bulldog and not let something go, but that is neither trolling or ad hominem.

  88. ksagnostic
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 6:13 pm | Permalink

    Back on the subject, I can’t get too worked up about McCain’s stand on farm bills. In fact, I tend to agree with his “corporate welfare” description.

  89. Regular
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 6:15 pm | Permalink

    #
    ksagnostic
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 6:09 pm | Permalink

    Without feeding the troll directly…

    “multi-nic’d ‘Regular’,

    “And where are your Justice Dept. and Congressional links supporting your (invalid) claim that the Sierra Club ’screwed’ the New Orleans levees?”

    To observers:

    Where is the ad hominum here? The multi-nic’d is, to those unfamiliar with history here, literally true, Regular did post under multiple nics and at times denied in a subsequent nic that a previous nic was him. The rest is a request to substantiate a previous allegation in light of new ones. I would be the first to agree that cosmos can be a bulldog and not let something go, but that is neither trolling or ad hominem.
    ———————
    The jaw less fish declares that posting the same message for two solid years and doing so in a topic totally unrelated to the Sierra Club or its issues is not trolling.

    The jaw less fish definitely has its panties bunched up in its crack and is forcing out mucous bubbles through its gills.

  90. ksagnostic
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 6:18 pm | Permalink

    There is, however, much more to the farm bill. FYI:

    http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/in_the_farm_bill_how_much_money.html

  91. ksagnostic
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 6:21 pm | Permalink

    Translation of the post from Regular.

    “Notice meeeeeeeee! I am coming back with personal iiiiiiinsuuuuuulllllllts!”

    Nah. I’m done.

    Following my own advice.

    Re:Regular
    DNFTT

  92. outlander
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 6:42 pm | Permalink

    Sort of puts the level of discourse between political opponents around here to shame:

    ——————–

    “Dr. Lukacs told me during a recent interview that in his opinion Winston Churchill’s best oration from those days was the eulogy he shared about Neville Chamberlain, who succumbed to complications due to stomach cancer on November 10, 1940, just six months after leaving office:

    “It fell to Neville Chamberlain in one of the supreme crises of the world to be contradicted by events, to be disappointed in his hopes, and to be deceived and cheated by a wicked man. But what were these hopes in which he was disappointed? What were these wishes in which he was frustrated? What was that faith that was abused? They were surely among the most noble and benevolent instincts of the human heart–the love of peace, the toil for peace, the strife for peace, the pursuit of peace, even at great peril, and certainly to the utter disdain of popularity or clamour. Whatever else history may or may not say about these terrible, tremendous years, we can be sure that Neville Chamberlain acted with perfect sincerity according to his lights and strove to the utmost of his capacity and authority, which were powerful, to save the world from the awful, devastating struggle in which we are now engaged. This alone will stand him in good stead as far as what is called the verdict of history is concerned.”

    Frankly, Winston Churchill was not the one-dimensional warmonger some in his day thought him to be, and that some even today persist in insisting he was. He was an inspiring leader at the right time and in the right place.

    It’s vital that he not be forgotten, nor demonized through the writing of specious history. A new generation, one easily influenced by fleeting images and drawn to the simplistic rhetoric of political gurus, needs to get a sense of this great man and glean from his courage and character.

    John Lukacs concludes his narrative with an excerpt from a speech made by Mr. Churchill in 1955, when his active political life was drawing to a close at the age of eighty:

    “Which way shall we turn to save our lives and the future of the world? It does not matter so much for old people; they are going soon anyway; but I find it poignant to look at youth and wonder what would lie before them if God wearied of mankind.”

    Something to think about before a torch is passed to yet another new generation of Americans.

  93. cosmos_originally
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 7:03 pm | Permalink

    Actually, my asking the multi-nic’d ‘Regular’ to provide his (nonexistent) Justice Dept. and Congressional links was related to his post attacking links and sources from “Libs”.

    http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/06/mccain-needs-to-make-nice-to-farmers/#comment-372522

    “I would say the Libs that provided some mysterious link from a suspect source are as full of beans as the supposed claim.”
    ———-

    My post follows that one.

  94. KansasNative
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 7:08 pm | Permalink

    For those interested in joining the Sierra Club or reading about this great environmental organization’s activities (or just to PO Reguliar and his buddy Bushlicker) go to

    sierraclub.org

  95. KansasNative
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 7:13 pm | Permalink

    make that:

    http://www.sierraclub.org

  96. KansasNative
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 7:13 pm | Permalink

    Cleveland, OH — Today the Sierra Club and the United Steelworkers jointly endorsed Barack Obama for President. We believe he is the leader who can put America on the path to a clean energy economy that creates and keeps millions of jobs, spurs innovation and opportunity, and makes this a more secure nation.

  97. Predestined
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 9:07 pm | Permalink

    FDR was know for his profane outbursts. So what’s your point?

    So is Dubya. Free Speech Zones, anyone?

  98. Mary_Caruso
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 9:59 pm | Permalink

    I hope McCain gets the chance to do the town hall thing with Obama…that should cinch it up for Obama for sure.
    McCain always comes across as smug and arrogant, the man can’t help it.

  99. Posted June 22, 2008 at 10:51 pm | Permalink

    I dont know how any man (or woman) could be President of the United States, and NOT be subject to profane outbursts on a somewhat regular basis. I mean, look at all of the brain trusts they have to work with? LOL

  100. Posted June 23, 2008 at 5:10 am | Permalink

    HEALTH CARE ROUND-TABLE DISCUSSION TO BE HELD IN WICHITA
    WICHITA, KS: Affordable health care tops the list as America’s biggest domestic worry these days. To address this concern, Democracy for America (Wichita) has assembled a panel of three speakers to offer concrete suggestions for reducing medical costs while at the same time improving health care.

    • Walt Chappell, Ph.D. and candidate for State School Board, “How to Reduce the Cost of Health Care”
    • Ron Hunninghake, M.D. from The Bright Spot for Health, “Nutritional Supplements and Health Maintenance”
    • Jane Byrnes, R.D., Distinguished Kansas Dietician and Personal Trainer, “Wellness, Much Cheaper than Sickness”

    This program is free and open to the public at The Wichita Central Library, 223 South Main from 7 to 8:30 pm on Tuesday, June 24 and Rockwell Library, 5939 East 9th from 7 to 8:30 pm on Thursday, June 26.

  101. Monkeyhawk
    Posted June 23, 2008 at 7:09 am | Permalink

    Bush Appointee Breaks the Law While Helping McCain Fundraise

    Looks like McCain’s maverick ways are rubbing off on others and causing them to do some crazy things… like, say, break the law.

    From the WaPo:

    A Canadian newspaper reported Thursday that Friday’s scheduled $100-a-plate luncheon speech by Sen. John McCain in Ottawa was organized in part by U.S. Ambassador David Wilkins, a former South Carolina lawmaker whom President Bush appointed in 2005.

    Democrats pointed out the article late Thursday night, and alleged that Wilkins’s actions could be construed as a violation of the Hatch Act, which prohibits many kinds of political activities by government employees.

    This ties in nicely with Scott McClellan’s testimony today. The main theme of his book is that this White House operates in a “permanent campaign mode,” where every action they take is politically calculated to help GOP electoral prospects. We saw it with the clueless Lurita Doan and we see it now with David Wilkins: It doesn’t matter if there are laws on the books prohibiting certain conduct; if it helps get Republicans elected, do it. And it appears that if it helps fill McCain’s empty coffers, he doesn’t have much of a problem with it either.

  102. Phantom
    Posted June 23, 2008 at 11:00 am | Permalink

    When McCain brings up his ‘war hero’ status, Obama needs to ask him if he truly did receive preferential treatment as a pow, as alleged by his captor. McCain would probably attack him physically.
    As a viet vet, I recall our warrant officers telling us that if we crashed, and the officers didn’t survive to exchange uniforms with them as it would be to our benefit to be perceived as higher value pow’s.
    So I’m relatively sure McCain did receive better treatment that the majority.

4 Trackbacks

  1. By Cash Advance Loans on July 13, 2008 at 5:41 pm

    Cash Advance Loans…

    Easy cash loan program offering cash loan advances before payday….

  2. By money magazine | Start a new day on July 14, 2008 at 9:31 am

    [...] pdf19 hours ago Seeds: 4 Peers: 0 Filesize: 44 mb.Monova.org RSS Feed – http://www.monova.org/|||Comment on McCain needs to make nice to farmers by Money Magazine …Money Magazine New Construction Associated Press… I didn’t agree with you first, but last [...]

  3. By How To Reduce Stomach Gas on July 17, 2008 at 11:05 pm

    How To Reduce Stomach Gas…

    Thanks for this post!…

  4. By Louis on July 18, 2008 at 1:14 am

    Louis…

    I just wanted to say that the quality of your Free Mp3 Download is exceptional. On top of all that it really complements the content that is provided by your site….