Comments on: Glickman thinks Tiahrt is doing fine

By: glickmand

glickmand — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:52:18 +0000

The headline “Glickman Thinks Tiahrt is Doing Fine” is unfortunate in that it implies that I support him for re-election. While I try not to say anything publicly negative about current political figures, I certainly did not mean to imply that I support Todd for re-election. I strongly support Donald Betts in his effort to become the Fourth District Congressman, and have in fact campaigned with him in the past and expect to do so in the future again.

By: mom

mom — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:15:28 +0000

Tiarht a good man, okay I’ll buy that.

A great leader? No, I’ll have to pass on that one. A great leader does not run over everyone that disagrees with him like Tiarht has. A great leader knows how to compromise to govern.

A wonderful congressman? Again, I’ll have to vote no on that one as well. A wonderful congressman knows there are all kinds of constituents, not just those that will kiss your feet.

By: Bill_McKean

Bill_McKean — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:29:19 +0000

Glickman is a damn lobbyist. He has to say nice things about incumbent Congressmen. I’m sure that Todd & Dan are best buds now.

By: kansasdem

kansasdem — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 19:03:55 +0000

Todd kinda sold out Boeing when he voted with McCain to allow foreign biddersfor the tanker deal. Burned out, sold out. Same Old. Same Old. Time for a change. (Even his hair is Old School.)

By: Nathaniel

Nathaniel — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:39:30 +0000

Tiahrt is a good man, a great leader, and a wonderful Congressman.

By: Maggotpunk

Maggotpunk — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:35:31 +0000

The Republican who came up with the “freedom fries” nonsense apologized. He is now opposed to the illegal occupation of Iraq and sides with the majority of Americans.

By: CapnAmerica

CapnAmerica — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:31:23 +0000

Thanks, MP.

Whatever happened to “freedom” fries anyway?

85 percent of English language words are derived from French roots. Doesn’t stop the ignorant xenophobes (i.e., CONs) from wanting to ban all-things-French from our culture.

By: CapnAmerica

CapnAmerica — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:28:02 +0000

Dittos to LindainKS.

Where does Glickman live these days, Hollywood?

After the campaign that Tiahrt ran against Glickman, one would think that alone would be enough to make him detest Tiahrt.

Some democrats are just “too nice.” Kerry, for one . . .

By: Maggotpunk

Maggotpunk — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:36:30 +0000

“Betts is a Traiter”

Traiter, from the French, to treat. So Betts is a treater. Yes, Betts will treat us to a better future if he is elected and retires Tiahrt. I couldn’t agree more.

By: thomaswitt

thomaswitt — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:06:04 +0000

That’s rather interesting that Glickman would say that. After all, he’s contributed a substantial sum to Betts’ campaign. From the FEC’s website:

GLICKMAN, DANIEL R. WASHINGTON
DC 20016 03/21/2008 1000.00 MOTION PICTURE ASSOC OF AM/CEO 28990827107

Glickman should be ashamed for supporting Betts out one side of his mouth while supporting Tiahrt out the other.

By: lindainks55

lindainks55 — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:30:04 +0000

I don’t think Glickman votes in Kansas any longer, does he?

I do vote in Kansas. My opinion has more clout than Glickmans.

I don’t think Tiahrt is doing fine.

By: Regular

Regular — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:03:27 +0000

Betts, a nice man, but a straight line Democratic Party ideologist. No ‘change’ in that man or his voting record.

By: writerdog

writerdog — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:26:41 +0000

In my limited interactions with the Kansas members of the house and senate. Of all of them Tiahrt has been the most willing to interact with the population of his district. He is also the most given to giving platitudes.

By: Taterchip

Taterchip — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:04:52 +0000

Betts is a Traiter, he voted for Illegals when the bill was being worked on!