Best service for cash advance loans nationwide….

I just came upon this website via the blogging baby website. Interesting post. This could have easily been written by me (with just a change or two). Funny to read another\’s story that is so similar to my own….

I didn’t agree with you first, but last paragraph makes sense for me…

I couldn’t understand some parts of this article, but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting….

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view…

“Society has a vested interest in promoting only traditional marriage. Men and women are not interchangeable, and same-sex unions—no matter how devoted and enduring—cannot take the place of a married husband and wife. The essential function of marriage is to unite male and female. That is the only kind of union that can produce new life, and therefore the only kind of union in which society has a survival stake.” —Jeff Jacoby

“Over the centuries in Western civilization, public policy has recognized the vital role of the family that the heterosexual family needed to be protected and defended in the law, because it provided crucial benefits for the well-being of society and family. That is different than a question of civil rights.” —Chuck Colson

I have a few of my own to add. My subcription to kfg’s comment based on bloggers here is ALSO qualified by…

How many times a poster claims to be Christian.

How often they revert to posting bible verse.

And how they judge others who call themselves Christians.

Hooray your advocacy here WS!

I wish Obama had it. When he did the McClurkin thing for votes?

That hurt a friend of mine. And I don’t bail on friends to work with enemies like Obama wants us to.

I’m 63, and I certainly haven’t gotten over it yet, and hope I never do!
The true test though isn’t how many partners, but how many times with the same partner. Most guys (well, maybe not Boxic) can usually find someone they can bullshit once, but the repeat business is what pays off!

And how so? Because I haven’t given up sex at the age of 56? Because I am unmarried and have dated multiple women over the past twenty years?

Sorry, dude, but adults in relationships have sex.

Get over it.

Doesn’t always work that way, Lick. Some of us just have a way with women and we don’t end up with just one. Some of us are way beyond one when we marry for the first time and the numbers keep growing throughout life.

There is no reason to condemn me because I have had more than one woman in my life.

Class has nothing to do with it.

Life happens.

Should have been

“Well, John_S, you have the primary human resources officer for a public university making quite frankly discriminatory remarks.”

I think my sentence lost something on the second or third edit.

As for the rest of your comments:

“ksagnostic,
gay relationships can be erroneously viewed as marriage only in a climate where marriage is in decline.”

Statement of opinion masquerading as a statement of unsupported fact. It’s also highly offensive bullsh*t. Like I said before, I know same sex couples who have lived marriage. They have stayed together, raised children, and supported one another though very difficult circumstances. Do you know what the end of a successful marriage is in almost all cases? A relationship that continues, where two people lovingly support each other through good times and bad, until one is left to grieve for the other. That is “happily ever after”. That…is…what…(successful) marriage…is. I know same sex couples who have done that, in spite of the fact that they don’t get the “benefits”. To claim that that kind of committment between same sex couples only happens in an environment where marriage is in decline is complete and total bullsh*t. As the article you yourself referenced indicated, marriage was already in decline in Scandanavia. There is no evidence, and none was presented, that correlation between decline in “traditional” heterosexual marriage and greater acceptance in same gender marriages indicates any sort of causation. And certainly, I have seen plenty of heterosexual marriages that have done just fine between partners who have no trouble with the idea of same sex marriages. It certainly hasn’t interfered with me and my wife making a lifelong committment to each other, even though we both already experienced the loss of a spouse. We clearly believe in marriage.

“But a decline in marriage has resulted in a population decrease in many european countries. It only goes to show how important marriage is for the future of society. No other type of relationship has as many benefits as marriage.”

No, a decline in the birth rate is responsible for the population decrease (and with immigration, there isn’t really a decline). Certainly, in a number of countries where birthrates are high, “traditional” marriage rates are not.

And in this country, areas with higher acceptance of the idea of gay marriage are not areas where marriage is “weakest”.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/14/weekinreview/14pamb.html

Ya’ wanna compare numbers, Licker? You don’t know me from Adam, yet you think you can make that statement? Loser. Let’s compare numbers, chump.

I got you beat………………..

Nope…you’ve answered it more than satisfactorily.
Now I know you are a geyser of B.S., and I can now believe what others have claimed…that you can’t be believed even for a minute.
But dream on, you are a legend in your own mind, just no one else’s.
WS you’re a hoot.
PS: I still think you should ask the farmer for advice, she’s the expert.

Jeez, do you really want to go there? Really?

Let’s just say that I am quite experienced with women and I am well familiar with the “box lick” technique. With a woman, I sure as Hell know what I am doing and they appreciate it immensely.

Any other questions?