Open thread 5/13

thread

339 Comments

  1. HLP
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 7:13 am | Permalink

    MUST WE SUFFER GLOBAL FAMINE AGAIN?

    Do today’s soaring food prices and Third World food riots mean we’re headed for global famine? Not any time soon-if we suspend the biofuels mandates quickly. Unfortunately, if we keep burning corn, wheat, and palm oil in our vehicles, there’s no limit to the hunger, malnutrition, wildlife extinction and political disruption we can cause.

    The problem is simple: Food demand is inelastic. People need about the same number of calories whether they’re expensive or cheap. But the demand for biofuels is almost without limit. An acre of corn produces only 50 gallons worth of gasoline per acre, while humans worldwide burn more than a trillion gallons of gasoline per year. Biofuels could absorb the whole world’s crop production without bringing down gasoline prices-because we’re banning coal and refusing to drill for oil. If we want to keep on eating, we’ll have to scrap the false “fuel security” of the biofuels.

    Even giving up biofuels won’t stave off the world’s hunger for long, because we’ll need more than twice as much food and feed per year by 2050. The number of humans is likely to peak at about 8 billion, up from today’s 6.4 billion, and at least 7 billion of them are likely to be affluent enough to eat meat and ice cream. They’ll have fewer children-but more pets, few of them vegetarian.

    If the world plans to have forests, wildlands, and wildlife species in the 22nd century, then we’ll need to triple the crop yields on the land we already farm-just for food and feed. Except for a chunk of western Brazil, there isn’t much high-quality cropland left in the world for cropland expansion, and none of it “extra” for biofuels.

    But the same people who don’t want us to burn coal are telling us not to raise high-yield crops either. Greenpeace and the World Wildlife Fund tell us not to use nitrogen fertilizer taken from the air. They demand organic-only nitrogen from cattle manure or green manure crops-but such low-yield systems produce only half as much food per acre.

    We’re locked into the same “don’t use it” debate on food as on energy. Is the Greens’ information on high yield crops any better than their “advice” on global warming-which tells us to stop burning fossil fuels though the world has cooled over the last ten years?

    The funding for farm science has declined sharply since Dr. Norman Borlaug led the Green Revolution and saved a billion people from starving. America’s land-grant universities are now researching how to farm organically, though such “research” has never produced a yield breakthrough. The high-yield studies are being done mainly by agribusiness-and by Bill Gates who has vowed to rekindle a Green Revolution for Africa whether the Greens like it or not.

    Now, a big new report from the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) has been cited as evidence that industrialized food production is screwing up the planet. This report was supposed to be the “big tent” laying out the consensus path for future agricultural research. The land-grant agriculture schools, Greenpeace, agribusiness, FAO, all were included. But, by the time the report was issued, only Greenpeace seemed to be at the drafting table.

    And guess who’s in charge of this new “pattern for farming’s future”? Robert Watson, a British-born chemist who served as chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change from 1997-2002. What are the chances that the Greens’ farm science is any more honest than the IPCC’s global warming “science”?

  2. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 7:28 am | Permalink

    “And guess who’s in charge of this new “pattern for farming’s future”? Robert Watson, a British-born chemist who served as chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change from 1997-2002. What are the chances that the Greens’ farm science is any more honest than the IPCC’s global warming “science”?

    Well Hank, the IPCC appears to be on a fast track to bankrupting and starving the world. Good job!
    :roll:

  3. SolDevVB
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 7:48 am | Permalink

    After 1,000 Killed, a Ceasefire Is Reached in Sadr City

    In Iraq, a ceasefire has been reached in Sadr City, ending two months of US-led attacks on the Shiite neighborhood in Baghdad. During that time, nearly 1,000 people are believed to have been killed. Thousands more fled their homes to escape the daily air strikes. The ceasefire between the Iraqi government and Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr was reached on Saturday.

    You have to wonder what Sadr was promised…

    US-Backed Iraqi Troops Launch Attack in Mosul

    Meanwhile, US-backed Iraqi troops have launched a major attack on Mosul, the largest Sunni city in Iraq. Patrick Cockburn of the London Independent reports Mosul has been turned into a ghost town. He reports that soldiers are shooting at any civilian vehicle on the street that defies the city’s strict curfew. On Sunday, US troops shot dead two men, a woman and child after they failed to follow orders to stop. The Iraqi government claims the offensive in Mosul is needed to crush al-Qaeda in Iraq.

    Report: Blackwater Won’t Face Criminal Charges for Civilian Deaths

    In other Iraq news, the Associated Press reports the private military contractor Blackwater is not expected to face criminal charges for the shooting deaths of seventeen civilians in Baghdad. The final decision on any charges will not be made until late summer at the earliest. The seven-month-old Justice Department investigation is reportedly focused on as few as three or four Blackwater guards who could be indicted in the September 16 shootings.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2008/5/12/headlines

  4. LR2
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 7:50 am | Permalink

    as if either of you know — you act / sound like you know all these scientists personally and have a personal relationship with the weather men … —-

    the closest thing you have to a weather station is a wet finger and an old coca cola sign thermometer – you’re in Kansas buggers —–

  5. American_Way
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 7:52 am | Permalink

    Not sure the validity of information below on the Global Poverty Act, but it surely involved $$$.
    Our money. Actually, IOU’s to be paid back to a broke US Treasury by our children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren:

    “The United States Senate may vote any day on the stealth imposition of what could amount to an $845 BILLION United Nations style global tax on American citizens?

    It’s called the Global Poverty Act (S.2433), and it is being sponsored by none other than Senator Barack Obama.

    According to some conservative sources, this disastrous legislation could eventually force U.S. taxpayers to fork over as much as 0.7 percent of the nation’s Gross Domestic Product — or $845,000,000,000.00 — on welfare to third-world countries.

    Here’s what Phyllis Schlafly, conservative activist and founder of Eagle Forum, recently wrote:

    “Obama’s costly, dangerous and altogether bad bill (S. 2433), which could come up in the Senate any day, is called the Global Poverty Act. It would commit U.S. taxpayers to spend 0.7 percent of our Gross Domestic Product on foreign handouts…” [Emphasis Mine]

    Time is of the essence because Senator Joe Biden, the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee just issued a report on the Global Poverty Act and it was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar on Thursday the 24th.

    That means that time is of the essence as this potentially massive surrender of your hard-earned tax dollars to the third world may be close to a vote.”

    As for specific figures… WorldNetDaily.com reports:

    “Those U.N. protocols would make U.S. law on issues ranging from the 2nd Amendment to energy usage and parental rights all subservient to United Nations whims.”

    “[T]he legislation, if approved, dedicates 0.7 percent of the U.S. gross national product to foreign aid, which over 13 years… would amount to $845 billion ‘over and above what the U.S. already spends.’”

    “The plan passed the House in 2007 ‘because most members didn’t realize what was in it.’ Congressional sponsors have been careful not to calculate the amount of foreign aid spending that it would require.”

    And, how would the United States pay for this $845 BILLION commitment? According to Kincaid, who published a report on the legislation; “A global tax will clearly be necessary to force American taxpayers to provide the money.”

    And that $845 BILLION global tax is in addition to our nation’s current Foreign Aid programs, which, in 2006, cost American taxpayers about $300 BILLION!

    Senator Obama’s Global Poverty Act has already passed the House (many Members unfortunately voted in favor of it without carefully noting exactly what was in it) and President Bush may very well sign it!”

    http://www.borgenproject.org/globalpovertyact.html

  6. Posted May 13, 2008 at 8:31 am | Permalink

    A lot of what is called “foreign aid” is actually money we give countries like Israel so that they can turn around and buy our attack jets and military weaponary.

    It’s another form of subsidy for the huge war-machine and the crony contractors who make up the “military-industrial complex.”

  7. Posted May 13, 2008 at 8:49 am | Permalink

    More bad news for the CONs–

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24582429/

    WASHINGTON – Former Republican Rep. Bob Barr launched a Libertarian Party presidential bid Monday, saying voters are hungry for an alternative to the status quo who would dramatically cut the federal government.

    His candidacy throws a wild card into the White House race that many believe could peel away votes from Republican Sen. John McCain given the candidates’ similar positions on fiscal policy.

    Barr, who has hired Ross Perot’s former campaign manager, acknowledged that some Republicans have tried to discourage him from running. But he said he’s getting in the race to win, not to play spoiler or to make a point.

    . . .

    Barr, 59, quit the Republican Party two years ago, saying he had grown disillusioned with its failure to shrink government and its willingness to scale back civil liberties in fighting terrorism. He has been particularly critical of President Bush over the war in Iraq and says the administration is ignoring constitutional protections on due process and privacy.

    While in Congress, he was a persistent critic of President Clinton and was among the first to press for impeaching the former president. He helped manage House Republicans’ impeachment case before the Senate.

    ******

    Perot put Clinton in the White House. Nader put George W. in the White House.

    Now Bob Barr will help put Barack Obama in the White House.

  8. Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:03 am | Permalink

    These are the CON media pundits who get paid mega-big-bucks to shill for their right-wing sponsors.

    How’d they do ont the war in Iraq?

    ———-

    “Tommy Franks and the coalition forces have demonstrated the old axiom that boldness on the battlefield produces swift and relatively bloodless victory. The three-week swing through Iraq has utterly shattered skeptics’ complaints.”
    (Fox News Channel’s Tony Snow, 4/13/03)

    “The only people who think this wasn’t a victory are Upper Westside liberals, and a few people here in Washington.”
    (Charles Krauthammer, Inside Washington, WUSA-TV, 4/19/03)

    “The war was the hard part. The hard part was putting together a coalition, getting 300,000 troops over there and all their equipment and winning. And it gets easier. I mean, setting up a democracy is hard, but it is not as hard as winning a war.”
    (Fox News Channel’s Fred Barnes, 4/10/03)

    “I doubt that the journalists at the New York Times and NPR or at ABC or at CNN are going to ever admit just how wrong their negative pronouncements were over the past four weeks.”
    (MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough, 4/9/03)

    “Over the next couple of weeks when we find the chemical weapons this guy was amassing, the fact that this war was attacked by the left and so the right was so vindicated, I think, really means that the left is going to have to hang its head for three or four more years.”
    (Fox News Channel’s Dick Morris, 4/9/03)

    “Well, the hot story of the week is victory…. The Tommy Franks-Don Rumsfeld battle plan, war plan, worked brilliantly, a three-week war with mercifully few American deaths or Iraqi civilian deaths…. There is a lot of work yet to do, but all the naysayers have been humiliated so far…. The final word on this is, hooray.”
    (Fox News Channel’s Morton Kondracke, 4/12/03)

    “Sean Penn is at it again. The Hollywood star takes out a full-page ad out in the New York Times bashing George Bush. Apparently he still hasn’t figured out we won the war.”
    (MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough, 5/30/03)

    “This will be no war — there will be a fairly brief and ruthless military intervention…. The president will give an order. (The attack) will be rapid, accurate and dazzling…. It will be greeted by the majority of the Iraqi people as an emancipation. And I say, bring it on.”
    (Christopher Hitchens, in a 1/28/03 debate– cited in the Observer, 3/30/03)

    “I will bet you the best dinner in the gaslight district of San Diego that military action will not last more than a week. Are you willing to take that wager?”
    (Fox News Channel’s Bill O’Reilly, 1/29/03)

    “Even in the flush of triumph, doubts will be raised. Where are the supplies of germs and poison gas and plans for nukes to justify pre-emption? [Freed scientists will lead us to caches no inspectors could find.] What about remaining danger from Baathist torturers and war criminals forming pockets of resistance and plotting vengeance? [Their death wish is our command.]”
    (New York Times’ William Safire, 4/10/03)

    —–

    Wow. Now that’s what I call easy money. Become a stenographer for the Bush Administration and make millions and never lose your job even when you’re completely and totally wrong on the most important issue of the day . . .

  9. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:12 am | Permalink

    Marine Corp excees monthly recruiting goal with 142 percent

    WASHINGTON(AP) — The Marine Corps far surpassed its recruiting goal last month and could eventually be more than a year ahead of schedule in its plan to grow the force to 202,000 members.

    All military services met or exceeded their monthly recruiting goals in April, with the Marine Corps signing 142 percent of the number it was looking for, the Pentagon said.

    The Army signed 101 percent of its goal, recruiting 5,681 against a goal of 5,650. The Navy and Air Force met their goals — 2,905 sailors and 2,435 airmen.

    The Marine Corps enlisted 2,233 recruits against a goal of 1,577.

    “The Marine Corps, if they continue to achieve the kind of success they have had, could meet their growth figures more than a year early,” Defense Department spokesman Bryan Whitman told Pentagon reporters. That would mean by around the end of 2009.

    Stretched thin by the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Pentagon last year recommended

  10. DavidB
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:25 am | Permalink

    When the economy goes south and the country loses good jobs… and you lower your recruiting standards to accept sub-standard soldiers… what do you expect???

    Works every time!!!!!

  11. Phantom
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:26 am | Permalink

    Life not so good for the average wal-mart bush voter.

    Wal-Mart shares, which through Monday were up 22 percent year to date, fell 3 percent in early trading.

    Net income rose to $3.02 billion, or 76 cents per share, in the first quarter ended on April 30, from $2.83 billion, or 68 cents per share, a year earlier.

    The results matched the analysts’ average forecast, according to Reuters Estimates.

    Consumers are seeking out Wal-Mart’s low prices, especially for basic items like groceries, shampoo and cleaning supplies, as the U.S. economy falters and prices of food and fuel soar.

    The economic downturn comes as Wal-Mart has gotten back to the basics, trumpeting its low prices and slowing its aggressive expansion plans, to improve results at its existing U.S. stores.

    At the end of January, Wal-Mart slashed prices on thousands of items by up to 30 percent to win sales from cash-strapped U.S. shoppers.

  12. Phantom
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:28 am | Permalink

    Looks like the troops are in the middle of the shiite civil war:
    Shi’ite gunmen in Baghdad ignore truce By Tim Cocks and Waleed Ibrahim
    Tue May 13, 7:05 AM ET

    BAGHDAD (Reuters) – An agreement aimed at ending fighting in the Baghdad bastion of Iraqi Shi’ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr was on the verge of collapse on Tuesday after gunmen launched a spate of attacks on U.S. troops.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    The deal between the ruling Shi’ite alliance and Sadr’s opposition movement in parliament to end fighting in the Sadr City slum district was formally signed on Monday.

    But with the ink barely dry on the 16-point pact, clashes flared overnight, raising questions over how much control the anti-American cleric has over some of the Mehdi Army militiamen who profess allegiance to him.

    “It is clear that Sadr does not control all of the armed groups that make up the Mehdi Army,” Kadhum al-Muqdadi, a professor at Baghdad University, told Reuters. “This fighting could last a long time.”

    A statement from the Mehdi Army leadership that was read out in mosques in Sadr City late on Monday said the agreement needed to be respected, residents said.

    Nevertheless, the U.S. military said violence broke out between its troops and militants in Sadr City overnight, where seven weeks of clashes have already killed hundreds of people.

    A Reuters witness said there had also been intense gun battles between Iraqi security forces and militiamen on Tuesday in Shula, a Sadr stronghold in northwestern Baghdad.

    Iraqi police said 11 people were killed and 20 wounded in clashes in Sadr City since Monday night.

    They did not give precise details but the U.S. military said it had killed at least three militiamen planting roadside bombs. U.S. troops were attacked numerous times with small arms fire.

    A spokesman for the U.S. military in Baghdad, Lieutenant-Colonel Steven Stover, said U.S. forces only targeted militants launching attacks in Monday night’s clashes.

    “We’re not looking for a fight — we are establishing a safe neighborhood for Sadr City residents,” Stover said. “They (the militants) are obviously not listening to any agreement.”

    The deal to end the fighting was announced on Saturday and welcomed by Shi’ite Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki. His crackdown in late March on militias sparked fierce resistance from Shi’ite gunmen, especially the Mehdi Army.

    U.S. BLAMES IRAN

    The U.S. blames much of the violence on rogue elements of Sadr’s militia it says get weapons, money and training from Shi’ite neighbor Iran, especially modern rockets that have been fired at the Green Zone government compound in Baghdad.

    Tehran denies the accusations.

    Sadr’s political movement sought to distance itself on Tuesday from the more unruly militia elements in Sadr City.

    Bahaa al-Araji, a legislator from Sadr’s movement, said he believed the Mehdi Army was committed to the agreement.

    A U.S. military official said a surface-to-air missile was fired from eastern Baghdad at a U.S. aircraft on Saturday evening. The missile exploded harmlessly, the official said.

    He did say what type of aircraft was attacked, but the New York Times reported the missile was fired at a U.S. Apache attack helicopter. It was launched after the agreement to end fighting in Sadr City had been announced.

    Maliki says operations against militias are intended to impose law and order. Sadrist officials have accused him of trying to sideline the cleric’s popular mass movement before provincial elections in October.

    The movement, which boycotted the last local elections in 2005, is expected to do well at the expense of other Shi’ite parties supporting Maliki, especially in the Shi’ite south.

    Sadr, who is believed to be living in Iran, originally imposed a ceasefire on his Mehdi Army last August as part of attempts to reassert control over his organization.

    While the order held for many months, it has appeared increasingly irrelevant in recent weeks.

    (Additional reporting by Wisam Mohammed, Aseel Kami, Khalid al-Ansary and Oleg Popov, Editing by Dean Yates and Samia Nakhoul)

  13. Phantom
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:30 am | Permalink

    Republicans are getting us back to basics, food, shelter, having used security to accomplish the above.
    Must be fans of Maslow’s hierarchy.

  14. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:31 am | Permalink

    Say Clark, it’s not Max’s plan for cutting the Debt you need to worry about.

    Your man Obama, what’s HIS plan?

    1)How much more is Obama going to spend to keep all the gifts promised during his campaign?

    2)How much more is Obama going to raise taxes and who will that impact?

    Crap, Obama has no specific economic plan even on his own web site!

    If your so concerned about the Debt Clark, how can you support a man without a plan?

  15. DavidB
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:33 am | Permalink

    Correction.. the ARMY has lowered standards.. My bad. I have not seen that the Marines have officially lowered standards – but I am checking…..

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15197832/

  16. Phantom
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:39 am | Permalink

    Kind of disappointed in the eagle, why didn’t they pick up on the story about the corrupt Iraq govt.? Just because we’re a Red state is no excuse. They could have written about this is the kind of govt. mccain wants to be partners with for the next 100 yrs.

  17. Phantom
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:44 am | Permalink

    Latest Wash. Post/ABC poll shows 82% of Americans think we’re on the wrong track.
    Guess we’ll have to now refer to them as 18%ers!
    The embarassment is that it isn’t yet affecting bush ultra-light mccain. Fool me twice, you can fool me three times!

  18. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:51 am | Permalink

    Global Poverty Act?

    $845 BILLION American dollars Obama is planning to send to the 3rd World?

    Is Obama running for President of the US, or UN Global Leader?
    —————————————————————————————————–
    American_Way
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 7:52 am | Permalink

    And that $845 BILLION global tax is in addition to our nation’s current Foreign Aid programs, which, in 2006, cost American taxpayers about $300 BILLION!

    Senator Obama’s Global Poverty Act has already passed the House (many Members unfortunately voted in favor of it without carefully noting exactly what was in it) and President Bush may very well sign it!”

    http://www.borgenproject.org/globalpovertyact.html

  19. HLP
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:52 am | Permalink

    Good morning Capn.!

    Conservatives this year are left with no real choice. It looks like we’ll have a liberal with no clue running against a more liberal with no chance of a clue.

    If Bob Barr is on the ticket in Kansas, he has my vote.

    The absolutely only thing that McCain has going for him is he promised to appoint originalist judges. But I don’t believe him.

  20. American_Way
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:53 am | Permalink

    “Your man Obama, what’s HIS plan?”

    OBAMA IS WAFFLING ON HIS CAPITAL GAINS TAX HIKE

    Today, Obama Claimed He Would Only Raise Capital Gains Taxes As High As 20 Percent:

    Obama: “In terms of capital gains I’ve suggested we might go back up to 20 [percent].” (Fox News’ “Fox New Sunday,” 4/27/08)

    But Only A Few Weeks Ago, Obama Said He Would Raise Them As High As 28 Percent:

    On March 30, Obama Advocated Raising The Capital Gains Tax Potentially To 28 Percent. CNBC’s Maria Bartiromo: “How do you plan to change the tax code when it comes to capital gains? How high will that 15 percent rate go?” Obama: “I haven’t given a firm number. Here’s my belief, that we can’t go back to some of the, you know, confiscatory rates that existed in the past that distorted sound economics. And I certainly would not go above what existed under Bill Clinton, which was the 28 percent. I would–and my guess would be it would be significantly lower than that. I think that we can have a capital gains rate that is higher than 15 percent.” Bartiromo: “Well, let’s hypothetically say the cap gains tax goes from 15 percent to 25 percent. You’re impacting a lot of people. A hundred million Americans own stocks today.” Obama: “Absolutely.” Bartiromo: “So it’s not just the rich.” Obama: “No, no, no, absolutely. And that’s why I think that it may be, for example, that you could structure something in which people of certain incomes were exempted from this increase and it would stay at 15. The broader principle that I’m interested in is just making sure that we’ve got a tax code that is fair for all Americans.” (CNBC’s “Closing Bell,” 3/27/08)

    Americans Of Every Background Benefit From Lower Capital Gains Tax Rates:

    The Joint Committee On Taxation Reported Figures Demonstrating That Americans Earning Less Than $50,000 Benefitted From Lower Capital Gains And Dividends Tax Rates. “Figures from the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) help support the idea that more middle class Americans benefit from this tax break. In 2005, about 20 percent of the taxpayers who were expected to report capital gains income — and 24 percent of those expected to report dividend income — earned less than $50,000 annually, the JCT data showed.” (Joseph J. Schatz, “Tax Break Tries On ‘Middle Class’ Label,” Congressional Quarterly Weekly, 2/17/06)

    The Wall Street Journal Noted That 52 Percent Of American Adults Own Stock In Some Form. “But it’s not only the wealthy who will take a hit from higher capital gains taxes. Recent surveys indicate that roughly 52% of American adults own stock in some form, and last year 8.5 million of these investors paid a capital gains tax.” (Editorial, “A Capital Gains Primer,” The Wall Street Journal, 10/15/07)

    In 2005, The Average Capital Gains And Dividend Income Reported Per Tax Return In The U.S. Was $5,840. On Average, It Accounted For 10.73 Percent Of Adjusted Gross Income. (”Dividends And Capital Gains Income Compared To Other Income, 2005,” The Tax Foundation, taxfoundation.org, 7/16/07)” Finance ABC.com

  21. American_Way
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:54 am | Permalink

    “Your man Obama, what’s HIS plan?”

    OBAMA BREAKS HIS TAX PLEDGE; WOULD TAX MIDDLE-INCOME FAMILIES AND SMALL BUSINESSES

    Today, Obama Said He Would Raise Payroll Taxes On Americans And Small Businesses Earning Over $102,000:

    Obama Is Comfortable Raising Payroll Taxes On Americans Earning $102,000 A Year. Obama: “And in terms of raising the payroll tax, raising the cap on the payroll tax, right now everybody who is making $102,000 or less pays 100 percent, payroll tax on 100 percent of their income. There are about 3 – 4 percent of Americans who are above $102,000 in income every year. So if you want to talk about who’s middle class, me giving cuts to folks making $60,000, $70,000 and potentially asking more from friends of mine like Warren Buffet who I have no idea what he made last year, you know, that’s a debate I’m happy to have with John McCain.” (Fox News’ “Fox New Sunday,” 4/27/08)

    But Only Two Weeks Ago, Obama Pledged He Wouldn’t Raise Taxes On Americans Earning Less Than $200,000:

    When Asked By ABC’s George Stephanopoulos If He Would Pledge Not To Raise Taxes On The Middle Class, Obama Agreed. ABC’s George Stephanopoulos: “Would you take the same pledge [that there will be no tax increases of any kind, for anyone earning under $200,000 a year]?” Obama: “Well, I not only have pledged not to raise their taxes, I’ve been the first candidate in this race to specifically say I would cut their taxes.” (ABC Democrat Candidates Presidential Debate, Philadelphia, PA, 4/16/08)

    ABC’s Charles Gibson: “Senator Obama, you both have now just taken this pledge on people under $250,000 — and 200-and-what? $250,000?” Obama: “Well, it depends on how you calculate it, but it would be between $200,000 and $250,000.” (ABC Democrat Candidates Presidential Debate, Philadelphia, PA, 4/16/08)

  22. American_Way
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:56 am | Permalink

    “Your man Obama, what’s HIS plan?”

    Obama also said he would eliminate the Bush tax cuts and install what he called a “middle class tax cut.”
    Blitzer asked Obama to define “middle class.”
    Obama replied, “You know, I think the definitions are always a little bit rough” and said “if you’re making $100,000 a year or less, then you’re pretty solidly middle class…On the other hand, if you’re making more than $100,000 and certainly if you’re making more than $200,000 or $250,000, you’re doing pretty well.”

    — Three Million Small Business Owners Would Have Their Taxes Raised.
    “Lost in Obama’s calculations is that many of the people who would be
    affected by eliminating the earnings cap are small-business owners …
    Taxes would also be raised on 3 million small-business owners.” (Editorial,
    “Caps Off For Obama,” Investor’s Business Daily, 9/24/07)

    The Wall Street Journal: “But It’s Not Only The Wealthy Who Will Take A
    Hit From Higher Capital Gains Taxes. Recent Surveys Indicate That Roughly
    52% Of American Adults Own Stock In Some Form, And Last Year 8.5 Million Of
    These Investors Paid A Capital Gains Tax.” (Editorial, “A Capital Gains
    Primer,” The Wall Street Journal, 10/15/07)

    – Eliminating The Earnings Cap Would Reduce The Take-Home Pay Of 10.3
    Million Workers By An Average Of $5,650 And Raise Taxes On Four Million
    Workers Over Age 50. (Editorial, “Caps Off For Obama,” Investor’s Business
    Daily, 9/24/07)

    Obama Has Called For A Tax On Coal And Natural Gas, Which Will Hurt
    Pennsylvania:

  23. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:56 am | Permalink

    To show how far left the Libs are here, they can’t stand a MODIFIED Flat Tax that exempts the first $25,000 of income on individuals with a 20% rate above $25,000.

    Even posting examples showing how Progessive this plan is, isn’t enough for the Libs. Why?

    Because the Libs not only want ZERO tax for themselves, oh no, they want ZERO tax PLUS their EIC and Baby Credits too!

    Pure teet suckers they be.

    (Put your ear to the monitor and you can hear the Libs Oinking, Slurping, and Sucking!)

  24. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:57 am | Permalink

    Take a gander at all the No Votes Obama has cast while in the Senate. Senator “Save my own Hide” Osama Obama is more concerned about preserving his political neck that actually doing the will of the people.

    Date Description Bill Number IL-Obama NY-Clinton
    10/3/2007 Border Fence and Customs Appropriations S Amdt 3117 Obama NV Clinton Y
    9/27/2007 SCHIP Reauthorization HR 976 Obama NV Clinton Y
    9/26/2007 Regarding Iran and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps S Amdt 3017 Obama NV Clinton Y
    9/26/2007 Regarding Federalism in Iraq S Amdt 2997 Obama NV Clinton Y
    9/20/2007 Support for General Petraeus and Armed Forces S Amdt 2934 Obama NV Clinton N
    7/26/2007 REAL ID Funding S Amdt 2405 Obama NV Clinton Y
    7/26/2007 Border Fence and Customs Appropriations S Amdt 2480 Obama NV Clinton Y
    7/26/2007 Implementing the 9/11 Commission Recommendations Act HR 1 Obama NV Clinton Y
    7/26/2007 Department of Homeland Security Appropriations HR 2638 Obama NV Clinton Y
    7/20/2007 Student Loan Lender Subsidy Cuts and Student Grants HR 2669 Obama NV Clinton Y
    7/19/2007 Sense of the Senate on Guantanamo Bay Detainees S Amdt 2351 Obama NV Clinton Y
    6/11/2007 Attorney General No Confidence Vote S J Res 14 Obama NV Clinton Y
    5/7/2007 FDA Drug Import Certification Amendment S Amdt 1010 Obama NV Clinton N
    Date Description Bill Number IL-Obama NY-Clinton
    9/6/2006 Cluster Munitions Amendment HR 5631 Obama Y Clinton N
    8/1/2006 Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 S 3711 Obama N Clinton Y
    7/13/2006 Firearm Confiscation Prohibition Amendment HR 5441 Obama Y Clinton N
    7/11/2006 USEMA Amendment HR 5441 Obama Y Clinton N
    2/2/2006 Tax Reconciliation bill HR 4297 Obama N Clinton Y
    Date Description Bill Number IL-Obama NY-Clinton
    11/18/2005 Tax Reconciliation Bill S 2020 Obama N Clinton Y
    7/29/2005 Energy Policy Act of 2005 HR 6 Obama Y Clinton N
    6/14/2005 Thomas B. Griffith – US Circuit Judge PN 202 Obama Y Clinton N
    6/9/2005 Richard A Griffin – US Circuit Judge PN 195 Obama NV Clinton Y
    4/18/2005 Future Military Funding for Iraq Amendment HR 1268 Obama NV Clinton Y
    3/10/2005 Bankruptcy Reform Bill S 256 Obama N Clinton NV

  25. American_Way
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:57 am | Permalink

    And now spend:

    OBAMA WILL NEED MORE TAX HIKES TO COVER HIS BILLIONS IN NEW SPENDING

    Obama Has Been Criticized For Providing Insufficient Funding Sources To Pay For His Billions In New Spending:

    If Obama Could Enact All Of His Campaign Proposals, Taxpayers Would Be Faced With Financing $662.549 Billion In New Spending Over One White House Term. (RNC Research)

    “Many Critics Said Mr. Obama Was Playing Math Games When He Proposed Policies Without Identifying A Funding Source.” (Brian DeBose, “Obama Revises Plan On Tax Cuts,” The Washington Times, 10/1/07)

    Obama’s Funding Suggestions Are “Illustrative Rather Than Complete.” “‘Obama recognizes this is an arithmetic problem,’ [liberal economist Bob McIntyre] said Tuesday, ‘and offers suggestions that I assume are illustrative rather than complete.’ That’s hardly accounting for ‘every single dollar’ as Obama claims.” (Calvin Woodward, “Dems’ Accounting Falls Short,” The Associated Press, 1/22/08)

    Robert Bixby, Executive Director Of The Concord Coalition: “I couldn’t help but think, ‘Where is he [Obama] going to get the money to pay for these things?’” (Kevin G. Hall and Margaret Talev, “Clinton, Obama Ignore Budget Crisis, Promise Billions,” McClatchy Newspapers, 2/22/08)

    Media Sources Have Pointed Out That Obama Won’t Be Able To Afford His Domestic Programs Without Breaking His Pledge Not To Tax The Middle Class:

    The New York Times’ David Brooks Said For Obama And Clinton To Fund Their Domestic Programs “They Will Have To Break Their Pledge” Not To Tax The Middle Class. “Both promised to not raise taxes on those making less than $200,000 or $250,000 a year. They both just emasculated their domestic programs. Returning the rich to their Clinton-era tax rates will yield, at best, $40 billion a year in revenue. It’s impossible to fund a health care plan, let alone anything else, with that kind of money. The consequences are clear: if elected they will have to break their pledge, and thus destroy their credibility, or run a minimalist administration.” (David Brooks, Op-Ed, “No Whining About The Media,” The New York Times, 4/16/08)

    The New York Times: “In Effect, Mrs. Clinton And Mr. Obama Are Saying That They Can Pay For Their Promises Mainly By Raising Taxes On The Top 3 Percent Of Taxpayers. That’s Neither Politically Nor Economically Plausible.” (Editorial, “Empty Talk On Taxes,” The New York Times, 4/24/08)

  26. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:00 am | Permalink

    Ok AmWay, I also found similar articles showing Obama has No Economic Plan!

    Not even on his own web site!

    Where’s the beef? Obama be all FLUFF!!!!

    (Course the lil piggies believe whoever promises them the most free teet!)

  27. American_Way
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:02 am | Permalink

    So Max, in answer to your question, and in conclusion, I would have to say that Senator Obama’s plan basically consists of two items:

    1) Tax

    2) Spend

    You know, much like the libs have been crying about the republicans doing. The only difference I can see, is even though the middle class WILL be taxed more, they have the satisfaction of knowing the filthy rich will be paying a lot more.
    Of course, the last laugh will be on them. When they pay more for energy (gas/oil/coal), because of higher taxes, when they will be paying more shopping at small businesses, and when they will be paying more for professional services because the social security cap is eating into professional service providers income: The rich will be reaping higher returns on their investments.

  28. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:04 am | Permalink

    Clark btiches about the cost of the Iraq War and spending money overseas, yet Obama promises $845 Billion to give to the rest of the world – FROM American taxpayers!

    Clark doesn’t give a rip about the Debt, or he wouldn’t support Obama.

  29. DavidB
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:04 am | Permalink

    Yes, yes, Max. Only the Republicans can manage the economy.. see what a fine job they are doing now…….

  30. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:06 am | Permalink

    Yep. Obama sure is bringing folks together, isnt he?

    I see all those crossover republicans and independents just taking up the obama banner and marching with it.

    You must be so please captain at how obama is bringing the cons over to our side.

    HOPE AND CHANGE! HOPE AND CHANGE!

  31. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:07 am | Permalink

    Agree AmWay, Obama is MR. Tax & Spend.

    The POOOOR though, will get Energy Credits, likely in the form of an ATM card where they will get $100 of free gasoline every month.

    The Debt will soar of course, and the Dollar will get even weaker, but Obama will just Spend and Tax more to compensate.

    And American jobs will disapear as over taxed businesses close down.

    But who cares? Anything to get ELECTED.

    Besides, Obama doesn’t care about AMERICA! He’s running for President of the UN – The World! (Why else would he propose spending $845 Billion overseas?)

  32. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:10 am | Permalink

    DavidB
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:04 am | Permalink
    Yes, yes, Max. Only the Republicans can manage the economy.. see what a fine job they are doing now…….
    ———————————————–

    Neither party can control spending David. Government can’t MANAGE it’s way out of a paper bag.

    You want that same Government to have more control, and more power, and more taxes, to spend even more!

    Great solution.

    (cough, cough)

  33. DavidB
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:10 am | Permalink

    LOL! Bush economic plan: Borrow and Spend.

  34. ghotiphaze
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:11 am | Permalink

    “Marine Corp excees monthly recruiting goal with 142 percent”

    I’m sure that has nothing to do with them opening their doors to morons, felons, and miscreants again–just like the old days. Y’know, even the scum of the world have to eat.

  35. DavidB
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:12 am | Permalink

    Did I say that? Nope. putting words in my mouth again…..

  36. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:16 am | Permalink

    Obama has NO PLAN for anything. That is what some of us have been pointing out for a long time. Remember how much trouble Mr. Controversy had getting real info from the obama campaign.

    The obama folks want to say well, we’ve got kids working on the campaign. GO higher up and you’ll get the real answer.

    And yet…

    This “no plans” thing continues to haunt him. On many issues.

    I guess he just thinks if he repeats “hope and change” often enough, the white house will fall in his lap.

    He really is from Kansas. “there’s no place like home, there’s no place like home”.

    Wash rinse repeat.

  37. Hud
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:18 am | Permalink

    “Bush economic plan: Borrow and Spend.”

    Obama economic plan: Tax more, Borrow more, and Spend More.

  38. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:20 am | Permalink

    In fact, not only does obama not have specific plans to fix the mess this country is in, he seems to be running on two things.

    “I’m not Hillary”

    and

    “I’m not bush”.

    How did that work for Al Gore and John Kerry?

  39. Boxlock
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:20 am | Permalink

    All I can say is ‘GRRRRRRREAT !!!’

    Liberal, Dodge and Garden City….YOU’RE NEXT!

    Subject: HUGE RAID IN IOWA.Waterloo Cattle Congress fairgrounds to process them…

    IS IT CHRISTMAS IN IOWA?…. Update: Up to 700 arrests estimated in Postville raid

    By NIGEL DUARA and WILLIAM PETROSKI REGISTER STAFF WRITERS May 12, 2008

    Postville, Ia. Four Homeland Security buses with U.S. Immigration and Customs tags on them have entered the Agriprocessors Inc. complex.

    The buses, along with a trail of SUVs and vans with Minnesota license plates, arrived at about 11:45 a.m. Federal agents descended upon this northeast Iowa community at about 10 a.m. today to conduct an immigration raid at the nations largest kosher meatpacking plant. The ICE agents entered the Postville plant to execute a criminal search warrant for evidence relating to aggravated identity theft, fraudulent use of Social Security numbers and other crimes, said Tim Counts, a Midwest ICE spokesman. Agents are also executing a civil search warrant for people illegally in the United States, he said.
    OAS_AD(’ArticleFlex_1′); on error resume next MM_FlashCanPlay = ( IsObject(CreateObject(”ShockwaveFlash.ShockwaveFlash.” & MM_contentVersion)))

    Immigration officials told aides to U.S. Rep. Bruce Braley that they expect 600 to 700 arrests. About 1,000 to 1,050 people work at the plant, according to Iowa Workforce Development.

    Chuck Larson, a truck driver for Agriprocessing, was in the plant when the agents arrived. There has to be 100 of them, he said of the agents.

    Larson said the agents told workers to stay in place then separated them by asking those with identification to stand to the right and those with other papers, to stand to the left.

    There was plenty of hollering, Larson said. You couldnt go anywhere.
    When asked who was separated, Larson said those standing in the group with other papers were all Hispanic.

    ICE spokesman Harold Ort in Postville did not confirm or deny that anyone had been detained, but went on to say that the children of those detained would be cared for and that their caregiver situation will be addressed.

    They were asked multiple times if they have any sole-caregiver issues or any childcare issues, Ort said.

    He said the two helicopters circling the complex were there to provide EMT support and to watch out for the agents on the ground.

    Jeff Schnerbach, a sub-contractor electrician with Viking Electric, said he was on break at 10 a.m. when 200 agents stringed into the complex.

    They took our statements, asked us where we were from, asked for an ID and let us go, Schnerbach.

    Early scene in Postville

    Earlier this morning, a helicopter hovered over the scene, and a number of agents formed a perimeter around the Agriprocessors facility. Vehicles from ICE and at least eight cars and vans from the Iowa State Patrol were at the plant. There were also reports of two moving vans at the scene, along with an ambulance and two black Chevrolet Suburbans.

    Counts declined to confirm where people who are arrested will be detained. Federal officials have leased the National Cattle Congress fairgrounds in Waterloo, but they declined to explain last week whether the property was being prepared for use as a detention center.

    Aides to Braley, a Waterloo Democrat, said they have been told that hundreds of arrests are expected because the action is more of an investigation than an immigration raid, and specific individuals are being targeted for arrest as part of the investigation.

    Jeff Giertz, a spokesman for Braley, said immigration officials left the impression that the Cattle Congress site will be used mainly for processing of suspects rather than any long-term detention.

    Counts said that each person being arrested would be questioned by ICE and by Public Health Service medical professionals to determine if they have humanitarian issues, including child care giver or medical issues.

    Those interviews will aid ICE in determining whether people will be detained or conditionally released on humanitarian grounds, pending their immigration court appearance, Counts said.

    Counts described the events in Postville as a single site operation. He said he was not aware of any other immigration raids being conducted elsewhere today.

    Postville Police Chief Michael Halse said he did not know anything about the raid until 10 a.m. today.

    Iowa Department of Public Safety officials referred all questions to federal authorities. A news conference is scheduled at 2 p.m. today at the U.S. Attorneys Office in Cedar Rapids.

    Postville, on the border of Allamakee and Clayton counties, is a community of more than 2,500 people that includes natives of German and Norwegian heritage and newcomers who include Hasidic Jews from New York, plus immigrants from Mexico, Russian, Ukraine and many other countries.

    The Agriprocessors plant, known as the nations largest kosher slaughterhouse, is northeast Iowas largest employer.

    About 200 Hasidic Jews arrived in Postville in 1987, when butcher Aaron Rubashkin of Brooklyns Crown Heights neighborhood reopened a defunct meat-packing plant with his two sons, Sholom and Heshy, just outside the city limits. Business boomed at the plant, reviving the depressed economy while pitting the newcomers against the predominately Lutheran community.

    A University of Iowa professor, Stephen Bloom, wrote a book, Postville: A Clash of Cultures in Heartland America, detailing what happened.

    Workers and immigration advocates in Iowa began girding for an immigration raid last week after learning that federal authorities had leased Waterloos Cattle Congress fairgrounds. Federal officials declined to explain their plans last week, but advocates worried the fairgrounds would be used as a detention center. Thats what happened in December 2006, when federal agents took people apprehended in a raid at the Swift & Co. meatpacking plant in Marshalltown to the Camp Dodge military base in Johnston.

    The scene in Waterloo

    In Waterloo, a helicopter cruised over the Cattle Congress fairgrounds about 12:45 p.m. as a group of about five reporters watched from a parking lot across the street from the main gate.

    U.S. Department of Homeland Security officials in black uniforms were posted at the gate and referred all reporter questions to Tim Counts, the spokesman.

    A few touring coach buses were parked inside the gates, along with several ICE vehicles.

  40. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:20 am | Permalink

    Regular, is “NV” a vote “No” or “No Vote” as in “Present but not voting”?

    You know, when he left the the Illinois statehouse 4 years ago, he had voted “Present” 130 TIMES!

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/us/politics/20obama.html

    How’s that for taking a stand?

    Will President Obama vote “Present” whenever a Bill crosses his desk? Or when that phone rings at 3 am, will he just say “Present!”?

  41. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:23 am | Permalink

    Obama has been in the US Senate since just 2005.

    That’s experience in 2005, and 2006 or 2 years.

    Since January of 2007, he’s been campaigning full-time.

    So, we have a Presidential candidate who effectively has a Whopping 2 Years of Experience in the US Senate!

  42. American_Way
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:26 am | Permalink

    “LOL! Bush economic plan: Borrow and Spend.”

    Hey DavidB, I won’t argue that point.

    But why ask for more of the same from a blue guy?
    Obama’s taxing will not be sufficient to cover all the spending (already forced spending and new programs).

  43. Monkeyhawk
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:30 am | Permalink

    “ksfarmgrrl” –

    Please provide me the cites, URLs, whatever you’ve got that explain the details of Senator Clinton’s *plans* for adopting the GLBT legislative wish list. I seem to have missed them.

    In the meantime, Obama is on record for a myriad of policy proposals.

    I can proviide those cites.

  44. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:30 am | Permalink

    Yeah Box, if they would enforce Immigration laws like they enforce Tax laws, we wouldn’t have this problem today with 20 million illegal immigrants.

    It’s not too late to start though.

    When the law is enforced, hundreds are rounded up, but the best part is that thousands flee On Their Own!

    Google this Postville story and you’ll read about mass paranoia and near panic in the streets as illegal immigrants disappeared for miles around BEFORE the raid!

    The IRS enforces the law very severely on just a small number of people. Yet that small level of enforcement is a huge deterrent to the rest of us who fear the IRS more so then any Government agency.

    Homeland Security and BCIS need to do the same as the IRS – Enforce the Law!

  45. DavidB
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:31 am | Permalink

    Maxie.. Maxie… Maxie… why are you sooooo fascinated about the Democratic candidates? Are you trying to decide between Senators Obama or Clinton.. or are you just tearing down the opposition? Should we be depending on you for some fair representation of their positions?

    You could be touting your choice for the next president…. Senator CO2 limitation mandates, extend the tax cuts for the rich he opposed McCann?

    Or really split the conservative vote and promote Barr?

    By the way… how much experience in Washingotn did Abraham Lincoln have? He turned out okay….

  46. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    AmWay, don’t you know the Democrats are far better then the Republicans at Taxing and Spending!

  47. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:34 am | Permalink

    Davy, can’t handle the topic – Obama?

    Just try to change the subject then.

    Monkey is hoping the subject will change too.

  48. American_Way
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:34 am | Permalink

    O.K.,

    It is time to end Operation Chaos. There is nothing more to be gained from it.

    Obama will be the candidate, unless the superdelegates start a liberal war by annointing Clinton.

    Mission accomplished.

    At this point, the spotlight needs to fade from the blue vs blue arena, and force attention to the two remaining candidates.

    We need to see and hear more from McCain and Obama, instead of the Clinton Camelot diverting attention from the issues and proposed solutions.

    Even democrats are now saying Hillary staying in the race is helping their cause. Time to take the focus off the blue.

  49. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:35 am | Permalink

    For once I agree with Farmgirl. She hit it on the head with this post. But go ahead and talk about Abe Lincoln now.

    ————————————————————————————————–

    ksfarmgrrl
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:20 am | Permalink
    In fact, not only does obama not have specific plans to fix the mess this country is in, he seems to be running on two things.

    “I’m not Hillary”

    and

    “I’m not bush”.

    How did that work for Al Gore and John Kerry?

  50. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:38 am | Permalink

    AmWay, there’s still time for Obama to FU again, and give Hillary the ammo she needs to sway the Superdelegates!

    You know, I talked to a stupid Democrat named Dick the other day. He had no idea his party even had Superdelegates!

    Typical stupid Democrat. He thought his vote counted.

  51. American_Way
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:44 am | Permalink

    “still time for Obama to FU again, and give Hillary the ammo”

    Not sure what you mean about Obama, but to the point of your subject regarding the superdelegates.

    There is nothing more to be gained by republicans voting for either Clinton or Obama. Might as well re-register and leave democrats standing like deer caught in the headlights – wondering where their “vast” swell of registered voters went.
    Besides, for conservatives it will just like taking a shower and getting cleaned up.

    Regarding the democratic convention: The best thing that could happen is the superdelegates cause a scene. There will be fallout – either way they go.

    To me, just let the democratic cookie crumble.

    Time to promote McClame, so maybe – just maybe I see a reason to support him for the white house.

    Staying home is a real option for me.

  52. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:44 am | Permalink

    MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:20 am | Permalink
    Regular, is “NV” a vote “No” or “No Vote” as in “Present but not voting”?

    You know, when he left the the Illinois statehouse 4 years ago, he had voted “Present” 130 TIMES!
    —————————————–
    Max, a NV in the Senate means –

    Not Voting, Excused, Absent, or Present

    Take your pick, but considering Osama Obama’s not present voting record in the Illinois State Senate, Obama was most likely present and wanted to preserve his political reputation by not committing to anything.

    Just like Osama Obama’s claim for change and he presents no plans for stating those changes.

    As it has been mentioned, Osama Obama has been in the U.S. Senate 3 years, 2 of those years have been campaigning for President.

    Osama Obama has no reliable record to check against, a questionable background, even more suspicious ties to radicals and Islamic fundamentalists and attends a church for 20 years without knowing what his Minister stood for.

    Osama Obama, a rebel without a clue.

  53. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:48 am | Permalink

    Oh Regular, Obama has been in the Senate since Jan 2005.

    He worked then in 2005 and 2006. That’s 2 years of Senate experience.

    He started campaigning full-time in January 2007.

  54. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:51 am | Permalink

    Obama’s favorite books. Look what tops the list!

    Favorite Book
    The Autobiography of Malcolm X, Song of Solomon by Toni Morrison; Moby Dick, Shakespeare’s Tragedies, Parting the Waters, Gilead, by Robinson; Self-Reliance by Emerson; The Bible, Lincoln’s Collected Writings.

    http://votesmart.org/extended_bio.php?can_id=9490

  55. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:55 am | Permalink

    MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:48 am | Permalink
    Oh Regular, Obama has been in the Senate since Jan 2005.

    He worked then in 2005 and 2006. That’s 2 years of Senate experience.

    He started campaigning full-time in January 2007.
    —————————

    Sorry, been taking math lessons from Chas.

  56. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:04 am | Permalink

    Monkey, why should I discuss Hillary and her plans? You arent going to vote for her anyway. You have already said obama has the nomination sewn up.

    Besides, you can use the google, no?

    She supports the repeal of DADT, and DOMA. You can look that up yourself.

    Besides, why waste time on Hillary? Let’s talk about YOUR guy and his specific plans.

    Or is this more of the obama strategy of just saying “I’m not Hillary”.

    you sound just like the republicans crying “Bill Clinton! Bill Clinton every time they get caught being stupid.

    Who gives a damn what Hillary thinks or does? Tell us more specifics about your “presumptive” nominee.

  57. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:04 am | Permalink

    2 Whopping Years in the US Senate.

    Before that, 8 years in the IL Senate.

    Before that, Community organizer (whatever the h*ll that is!) in Chicago for 5 years.

    Before that, College.

    Previous Occupation: Community organizer, Chicago, 1983-88
    Lecturer of constitutional law at University of Chicago Law School, 1993-2004

    Previous Office: Illinois State Senate, 1996-2004; U.S. Senate, 2004-date

    Education: BA, Columbia University, 1983; JD, Harvard Law School, 1991

    Birth: Aug 4, 1961, Honolulu, Hawaii

    http://www.issues2000.org/Profile_Barack_Obama.htm

  58. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:06 am | Permalink

    “MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:34 am | Permalink
    Davy, can’t handle the topic – Obama?

    Just try to change the subject then.

    Monkey is hoping the subject will change too.”

    hee hee hee heeeeeee….

    It must REALLY piss off monkey when MAX has his damn number and can predict his behavior.

    Dance puppet dance. Geez, we havent heard THAT for a while. Thankfully.

  59. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:06 am | Permalink

    Oh yeah, he lectured at college for 11 years.

    Real wealth of experience!

    Just look at that Leadership ability too! (He led a puppet show at church)

  60. bth
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:06 am | Permalink

    Hank – both I and Sierra Club have long been skepticle about corn-ethanol. I would, however, like to see cellulosic ethanol – especially if it can use garbage as feedstock.

  61. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:09 am | Permalink

    Oh Farmgirl, I’m SURE Monkey is going to, in the near future, provide a comprehensive list of those “myriad” policy proposals from Obama.

    —————————————————————————————————-

    Monkeyhawk
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:30 am | Permalink
    “ksfarmgrrl” –

    In the meantime, Obama is on record for a myriad of policy proposals.

    I can proviide those cites.

  62. bth
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:11 am | Permalink

    Meanwhile – in Bush’s war:

    “WASHINGTON – The Bush administration repeatedly ignored corruption at the highest levels within the Iraqi government and kept secret potentially embarrassing information so as not to undermine its relationship with Baghdad, according to two former State Department employees”

    http://www.kansas.com/wireupdates/story/401540.html

  63. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:14 am | Permalink

    Ok max. I’ll just wait right here for monkey to give us those famous obama solutions.

  64. gster
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:14 am | Permalink

    Ben- Isn’t corruption the cost of doing business in the world of Bushco? Just another “overhead” item?

  65. annie_moose
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:19 am | Permalink

    your tax dollars at work…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cV1VsgMyf88&feature=related

  66. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:20 am | Permalink

    Divert from Obama to Bush.

    Great tactic!

    Keep it up!

  67. annie_moose
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:35 am | Permalink

    Ever wonder what Max looks like?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctaaMoL3yIA

  68. American_Way
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:39 am | Permalink

    “Ever wonder what Max looks like?”

    Max, you must be having quite an effect here.
    They are curious as to what you look like.

    (me thinks annie wants to date you)

    But it just confirms you post Max – they divert attention from the subject when they have nothing.

    Getting personal is stage two!

  69. Monkeyhawk
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:44 am | Permalink

    “ksfarmgrrl” posts –

    “Ok max. I’ll just wait right here for monkey to give us those famous obama solutions.”

    Which solutions, “ksfarmgrrl?”

    There are plenty of position papers on the Obama web site. Maybe he didn’t get down to your specific personal issues, but you’re not telling me what those might be.

    In the meantime, you’re joining up with “MaxGrubnik?” in your contempt for Senator Obama?

    Where’s that come from?! Talk about strange bed-fellows.

    In the meantime, I simply asked for your evidence that Senator Clinton is an advocate for your issues. You responded, “…it doesn’t matter. You’ve already declared Obama the candidate.” Talk about a cop-out.

    And frankly (contrary to your previous accusations against me) I’m committed to advocate the presidency of whomever emerges from the Democratic National Convention with the nomination. Can you say as much?

    I mean, Mike Gravel could work the smoke-filled rooms and come out as the nominee and he’d still be better than Shrub’s Third Term, which is all McSame has to offer.

    As a dedicated Hillary-ite, you are pretty good with attacks, “ksfarmgrrl.” And, in your words, “how’s that worked out so far?”

  70. littlejohn
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:50 am | Permalink

    Your tax dollars at work:

    There’s something fishy in the Farm Bill, and taxpayers should beware. It’s a $170 million earmark for the salmon industry, quietly tucked into the mammoth bill at the last minute by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Rep. Mike Thompson (D-CA). I don’t know much about the salmon industry. Perhaps Pelosi and Thompson can explain why it was necessary to earmark $170 million of the taxpayers’ money with no public scrutiny or debate. The earmark wasn’t in the House-passed Farm Bill or the Senate version; it was simply “air-dropped” into the final bill in secret.

  71. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:51 am | Permalink

    Nice dodge. Go to the website. I’m so sure that is what the MAJORITY of voters are going to do.

    No. I will not support obama under any circumstance. I’m not supporting mcsame either. I’m just staying home.

    I got the memo. Obama doesnt need gays to vote for him.

    And it is not a cop out to refuse to discuss Hillary. She will NOT be the nominee. So why beat a dead horse?

    But thanks for proving my point, that without Hillary to run against, obama is reduced to “go to my website”.

    If that’s all he’s got, it’s gonna be a long march to November for you.

  72. annie_moose
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:53 am | Permalink

    Here’s A blast from the past on why the flat taxers have gotten nowhere

    Flat-Tax Follies
    New York Times
    Published: October 30, 1999

    The Republican presidential candidates who debated in New Hampshire Thursday night did not quarrel much. But it was especially discouraging that they embraced a flat tax to replace the progressive income tax. In the 1996 G.O.P. primaries, Steve Forbes made the flat tax a centerpiece of his campaign, only to have Bob Dole demolish the idea by pointing out the absurdity of lowering tax rates on rich people like Mr. Forbes and raising them on the middle class. This week Mr. Forbes said he was delighted at the revival of his issue. But Republicans would do well to drop it or risk being seen as a servant of the privileged.

    The current economic boom has benefited the wealthiest Americans while the working class has struggled to stay even. That is one reason the Republicans’ $792 billion tax cut scheme, weighted heavily toward the rich and vetoed by President Clinton, stirred so little support over the summer. Contrary to Alan Keyes’s overheated description of the income tax as slavery and a Marxist-Leninist plot, progressivity in tax rates has been accepted by Americans at least since the Civil War.

  73. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:54 am | Permalink

    Yeah, check out Obama’s Fiscal plan!

    See how GENERAL this is!

    For example:

    Reverse Bush Tax Cuts for the Wealthy: Obama will protect tax cuts for poor and middle class families, but he will reverse most of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest taxpayers.

    What dollar amount is “Wealthy”? WTF!?!

    http://www.barackobama.com/issues/fiscal/

    http://www.barackobama.com/issues/fiscal/ObamaPolicy_Fiscal.pdf

    (From the mouth’s own web site!)

  74. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:57 am | Permalink

    Sounds like what I said. Obama is only running on two things.

    I’m not bush.

    I’m not Hillary.

    And his supporters here today have confirmed it. Even his own damn website confirms it.

    Hope and change indeed.

  75. DavidB
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:59 am | Permalink

    According to Maxie’s count.. Obama has 15 years of public service.. That sounds like enough to know his way around . . .

    The Democrats have two highly qualified candidates – I’ll vote of either of them in the general election.

    Policy is changed in legislation. Electoral campaigns do not write legislation.
    If you have any ears and give a fair listen, you can judge what direction the candidates hope to steer the country.

    FROM: http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2007/12/18/ken_burns_compares_obama_to_li.html

    “Burns noted that Lincoln had come into the White House with much less Washington experience than other leading politicians of the 1850s. With the country in such a perilous state at the time, he said, one might have thought it needed an “old pro” like William Seward, when in fact, Burns said, “what the country really needed was a wiry, relatively inexperienced” person, Abe Lincoln.”

  76. American_Way
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 12:00 pm | Permalink

    “it was simply “air-dropped” into the final bill in secret.”

    Perfect example of why congress should stop the practise of earmark (pork) legislation.

    Porker of the Month Club & Pig Book:

    http://www.cagw.org/site/PageServer?pagename=reports_pigbook2008

    http://fedspending.org/

  77. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 12:03 pm | Permalink

    Yup AmWay, Annie has a crush on me. And she’s full of BS diversions too.

    Note how Monkey will follow the Party Line – blindly, no matter who the nominee is.

    I gained much respect for Farmgirl today, in that she sticks to her principals and will not support Obama and blindly follow her party and vote for any candidate with a “D” behind their name.

    And heck Monkey, just because Farmgirl agrees with Max on ONE topic, doesn’t me she’s wrong!

  78. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 12:04 pm | Permalink

    mean she’s wrong!

  79. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 12:10 pm | Permalink

    Follow my party?

    I’m NOT a democrat. Damn, I’ve said that like a thousand times here.

  80. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 12:14 pm | Permalink

    DavidB
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:59 am | Permalink
    According to Maxie’s count.. Obama has 15 years of public service.. That sounds like enough to know his way around . . .
    —————————————————-

    Oh, let’s not over state the case!

    BA 1983 (Four Years of College when he was age 22)

    Community organizer, Chicago, 1983-88 (5 years of doing what exactly? Organizing trash pick-up or what?)

    More College Harvard Law School, 1991 (1989 to 1991?)

    Lecturer of constitutional law at University of Chicago Law School, 1993-2004 (A Teacher for 11 Years)

    8 Years in IL State Senate (Voted “Present” 130 times)

    2 Years working in the US Senate (2 years campaigning as a Senator)

    That’s 10 years in elected office, and 5 years in Community Organizing (of trash collectors?)

  81. American_Way
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 12:14 pm | Permalink

    annie_moose
    “Here’s A blast from the past on why the flat taxers have gotten nowhere”

    Give it time Annie, give it time.
    The Flat Tax has been and is being recognized worldwide in all types of political governments:

    The Flat Tax Revolution in Europe
    David Storobin, Esq. – 8/5/2006
    In 1994, Estonia became the first country to institute the flat tax, charging 26% on all personal and corporate income with no deductions allowed. “The economy flourished” as a result, declared The Economist. The Estonian example was followed by the other two Baltic states, Latvia and Lithuania, but remained largely irrelevant and unknown to the world at large, as few people were aware of what was taking place in the region. But on January 1, 2001, Russia joined the Baltic states with an even lower tax rate of only 13% (the country’s corporate tax is still very high). This led the world to notice. In what was arguably President Vladimir Putin’s most successful act, tax reform jumpstarted Russia’s economy and tax revenue skyrocketed, doubling within three years.

    In 2003, Serbia passed flat tax reform with a new rate of 14%. The next year, Ukraine and Slovakia imposed a flat tax of 13% and 19%, respectively, and Romania’s flat tax – instituted in January 2005 – is 16%. The lowest tax of all, at only 12%, is in Georgia, which was passed by an overwhelming vote of 107 to 11 parliamentarians on December 22, 2004.

    Several other countries may join the above 9 nations if the next elections lead the opposition to take power. Poland, the most powerful East European country in the EU, is likely to be one. The main opposition, Polish Civic Platform Party, wants a 15% flat tax on personal and corporate income, as well as VAT.

    Likewise, the Civic Democratic Party, the primary opposition in the Czech Republic, is proposing a 15% flat tax, and even the governing Social Democrats are likely to simplify the tax system (without making it flat).

    Former Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, the leader of the main opposition party FIDESZ-MPP, said Budapest will have “no choice” but to jump on the “flat tax bandwagon” to retain the country’s share of foreign investments that will otherwise flow to flat tax nations. The statement was echoed by Hungary’s finance minister, Tibor Draskovics, a member of the Socialist Party, who is now prepared to examine the possibility of a flat-rate income tax. The governing coalition’s junior partner, the Free Democrats, had already issued which proposed a 30% optional flat tax on income in place of the current system, which has a top marginal rate of 38%.

    China is known to be examining a tax reform featuring a uniform, single tax rate for all. In Barbados, the President of the Barbados International Business Association, George Gleadall, called for a 12.5% flat rate on both personal and corporate income, indicating that it may even be as low as 7.5%.

    In past years, the Canadian Alliance, then the largest opposition party in Canada, called for a flat tax (CA merged with the Progressive Conservative Party, and is now known as the Conservative Party). China is known to be examining a tax reform featuring a uniform, single tax rate for all. In Barbados, the President of the Barbados International Business Association, George Gleadall, called for a 12.5% flat rate on both personal and corporate income, indicating that it may even be as low as 7.5%.

    In past years, the Canadian Alliance, then the largest opposition party in Canada, called for a flat tax (CA merged with the Progressive Conservative Party, and is now known as the Conservative Party).
    March 08, 2005
    Last January, Slovakia became the sixth Eastern European country to adopt a flat tax, which means all income-earners pay the same rate. Since then, Romania and Georgia have followed suit, creating a global proving ground for the concept. In the process, flat-taxers have moved Eastern Europe from a Communist backwater to an investment spring – pressuring its higher-taxed Western neighbors to adapt to the new environment.

    This flat tax revolution is changing the world. Jurisdictions with the most aggressive and far-reaching single-rate tax systems, such as Estonia, Hong Kong, and Slovakia, are enjoying rapid economic growth. Flat tax systems also are leading to more revenue in many cases, reaffirming the Laffer Curve notion that reasonable tax rates and strong economic growth are the best way to generate monies for government. Perhaps most important, the flat tax revolution signifies a victory over the notion that the tax code should be used to penalize those who contribute most to economic growth. The ultimate irony is that this revolution in both economic and moral attitudes is being led by nations in Central and Eastern Europe-countries that were part of the Communist Bloc less than two decades ago.

    Thanks to tax competition, it is likely that the list of flat tax nations will continue to expand.
    Center for
    Freedom and Prosperity
    April 20, 2008
    Trinidad and Tobago Joins the Flat Tax Bandwagon
    Effective January 1, 2006, Trinidad and Tobago joins the ranks of the flat-tax countries. It implemented a flat tax of 25%, replacing the previous two-bracket system of 25% and 30%. Other features included raising the personal allowance from TTD (Trinidad and Tobago dollars) 25,000 to TTD 60,000 ($1 = TTD 6.265).
    February 25, 2008
    Kazakhstan Joins the Flat Tax Bandwagon
    On February 1, 2006, the president of Kyrgyzstan signed into law a change in the country’s tax code that substituted a 10% flat tax on individual income in place of a graduated structure of rates between 10-20%. At that time the president of neighboring Kazakhstan said that his country would consider implementing a flat tax in 2007.
    January 14, 2008
    The Flat Tax is on the Agenda in Hungary
    Hungary is surrounded on several sides by flat tax countries: Slovakia in the north, Ukraine in the northeast, Romania in the east, and Serbia in the south. Near flat-tax neighbors include Bulgaria, Montenegro, Macedonia, and the Czech Republic. Hungary’s business daily Világgazdaság reported on January 11, 2008, that the current coalition government, which consists of the Socialist Party, the senior member of the ruling coalition, and the market oriented Free Democrats, is considering four tax measures to boost economic competitiveness. The chosen measure is expected to take effect in January 2009.
    January 14, 2008
    The Flat Tax Begins to Percolate in New Zealand
    New Zealand is scheduled to hold general elections for the 49th session of its parliament in late 2008, but no later than November 15, 2008, to comply with the convention that sessions shall not exceed three years. Current polls suggest that the opposition National Party will supplant the Labour Party as the leading vote-getter, but whichever wins a plurality of votes may have to form a coalition with the Green Party. Other minor parties include the Maori and the First-ACT parties.
    January 03, 2008
    The Flat Tax in Jamaica
    The flat-tax revolution has mainly encompassed Central and Eastern Europe. It has also touched Central Asia and Africa. For completeness, it is desirable to include the case of Jamaica, which has thus far been overlooked in these comments on countries that have adopted flat taxes.
    January 02, 2008
    The Flat Tax Spreads to the Canton of Obwalden in Switzerland
    Switzerland has a three-tiered income tax system in which income taxes are levied at the federal, cantonal, and municipal level. On average, about a third of all personal income taxes is collected at each level, although there is wide variation among the twenty-six cantons and some 2,900 municipalities. The federal income tax consists of nine brackets that range from 0% on the first Sfr 25,000 ($1 = Sfr1.13) to a top rate of 13.2%, after which it falls to 11.5% on income exceeding Sfr 716,500.
    January 02, 2008
    The Flat Tax is Implemented in Bulgaria
    Effective January 1, 2008, Bulgaria joins the raft of Central and Eastern European countries which have adopted the flat tax.
    December 13, 2007
    The Flat Tax at Work in Russia: Year Six, 2006
    The Federal Treasury of the Russian Federation has compiled the data for total taxes and revenues for the consolidated federal and regional budgets for 2006. The data show that the 13% flat tax on personal income continues to achieve very positive results.
    November 26, 2007
    The Flat Tax at Work in Montenegro
    In December 2006, Montenegro’s parliament approved a 15% flat tax on personal income. The new law sets the flat rate at 15% in 2007 and 2008, reduces it to 12% in 2009 and 9% in 2010.
    October 31, 2007
    The Flat Tax Expands its Ambit in Georgia
    Effective January 1, 2005, Georgia (the country, not the U.S. state) adopted a flat tax of 12%, replacing its previous four-bracket system.
    Hoover Institute

  82. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 12:16 pm | Permalink

    Whoops. Sorry Farmgirl. Forgot you claim neither party.

    Still, you follow your principles.

  83. annie_moose
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 12:20 pm | Permalink

    Maxi and A way hehehehehehe hehehehehe heheheheheh

    Chortle snort giggle laugh not much conviction in your arguments if all it takes are 2 clips off of utube to trip you up. Laugh hahahaha heheheheh .

  84. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 12:29 pm | Permalink

    ksfarmgrrl
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 12:10 pm | Permalink
    Follow my party?

    I’m NOT a democrat. Damn, I’ve said that like a thousand times here
    ———————————-

    I think kfg is one of those Breatharians or a Rastafarian or something. :D

  85. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 12:35 pm | Permalink

    Who tripped me up? Annie, you must cut-back on your drug use during the day.

    As for your Blast from the Past, AmWay posted much more recent information (in this Century even) about the trend toward flat taxation.

    You libs scream bloody murder if you have to pay a penny of tax yourselves.

    Heaven forbid!

  86. American_Way
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 12:39 pm | Permalink

    Pssst Annie!

    I don’t do youtube. At least not as links on blogs. Haven’t for over a year when the first time I clicked a link a poster provided, and I got a face full of porn. Haven’t clicked a youtube link since.

    Hope your link was funny.

  87. annie_moose
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 12:41 pm | Permalink

    Come on Maxi show me some documents on liberals not paying taxes. For that matter show me the welfare queens driving around in their beamers. Anybody confiscate your guns today Maxi? Well at least this will cheer you up

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zRmRJ6vA5c

  88. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 12:43 pm | Permalink

    AmWay – drug addiction annie, confirmed by her last several posts.

  89. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 12:44 pm | Permalink

    I sense arm flailing, the movement of ‘hot air’ has increased slightly from the doldums of the ‘Lib’ world.

  90. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 12:46 pm | Permalink

    Regular, it’s PASTAfarian, thank you very much!

    Ramen!

  91. Monkeyhawk
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 12:48 pm | Permalink

    “MaxGrobnik” contributes –

    “… just because Farmgirl agrees with Max on ONE topic, doesn’t me she’s wrong!”

    Nah.

    Bit that’s the way to bet.

  92. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 12:51 pm | Permalink

    Want a little cheese to go with that whine, monkey?

  93. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 12:55 pm | Permalink

    “Myriad Plans”

    Ha Ha Ha

  94. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 12:57 pm | Permalink

    Kerry had a Plan for everything.

    Obama has a Plan for nothing.

    Maybe less is more.

  95. Posted May 13, 2008 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    Isn’t it amazing that George Carlin – comedian of the 70’s and 80’s – could write something so very eloquent…and so very appropriate.

    A Message by George Carlin:

    The paradox of our time in history is that we have taller buildings but shorter tempers, wider Freeways, but narrower viewpoints. We spend more, but have less, we buy more, but enjoy less. We have bigger houses and smaller families, more conveniences, but less time. We have more degrees but less sense, more knowledge, but less judgment, more experts, yet more problems , more medicine, but less wellness.

    We drink too much, smoke too much, spend too recklessly, laugh too little, drive too fast, get too angry, stay up too late, get up too tired, read too little, watch TV too much, and pray too seldom.

    We have multiplied our possessions, but reduced our values. We talk too much, love too seldom, and hate too often.

    We’ve learned how to make a living, but not a life. We’ve added years to life not life to years. We’ve been all the way to the moon and back, but have trouble crossing the street to meet a new neighbor. We conquered outer space but not inner space. We’ve done larger things, but not better things.

    We’ve cleaned up the air, but polluted the soul. We’ve conquered the atom, but not our prejudice. We write more, but learn less. We plan more, but accomplish less. We’ve learned to rush, but not to wait. We build more computers to hold more information, to produce more copies than ever, but we communicate less and less.

    These are the times of fast foods and slow digestion, big men and small character, steep profits and shallow relationships. These are the days of two incomes but more divorce, fancier houses, but broken homes. These are days of quick trips, disposable diapers, throwaway morality, one night stands, overweight bodies, and pills that do everything from cheer, to quiet, to kill. It is a time when there is much in the showroom window and nothing in the stock room.

    Remember; spend some time with your loved ones, because they are not going to be around forever.

    Remember, say a kind word to someone who looks up to you in awe, because that little person soon will grow up and leave your side.

    Remember, to give a warm hug to the one next to you, because that is the only treasure you can give wit h your heart and it doesn’t cost a cent.

    Remember, to say, ‘I love you’ to your partner and your loved ones, but most of all mean it. A kiss and an embrace will mend hurt when it comes from deep inside of you.

    Remember to hold hands and cherish the moment for someday that person will not be there again.

    Give time to love, give time to speak! And give time to share the precious thoughts in your mind.

    AND ALWAYS REMEMBER:

    Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away.

    George Carlin

  96. Monkeyhawk
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 1:12 pm | Permalink

    “ksfarmgrrl” posted May 13, 2008 at 12:51 pm

    “Want a little cheese to go with that whine, monkey?”

    Besides being unoriginal, your post makes no sense,
    “ksfarmgrrl.”

  97. HLP
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 1:19 pm | Permalink

    As usuall Chas., my most reverend friend, you are again and continually full of $hit.

    http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/paradox.asp

  98. Posted May 13, 2008 at 1:29 pm | Permalink

    Hey, I got it with George Carlin on it… I just posted it, so dont call me stupid, you damned fundamentalist waccko!!

  99. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 1:33 pm | Permalink

    Oh MAN. I HATE it when I laugh so hard at one of Hank’s posts. I dont care who ya are, THAT’s funny!

    I’m STILL chuckling. Can I borrow that line sometime?

    “As usuall Chas., my most reverend friend, you are again and continually full of $hit.”

    ’cause it just has SO many applications. I’m not making fun of Chas, and in fact, I frequently feel sorry for him here.

    But he and grmie get their asses handed to them more often than any other posters. I can just feel how Hank feels because I feel that way about some of the wild assed stuff germie posts too.

    So.. the next time we wanna hand someone their factual ass, can we please borrow the “you are again and continually full of $hit” part?

    It would be so much fun.

  100. Posted May 13, 2008 at 1:39 pm | Permalink

    Hey, I got it that way in email… And I dont give a good goddam WHO wrote it, it has a lot of food for thought…

    Nice of Hank to respond to the content of the Post… (NOT) NOOOOOO Hank has to put out some negative bull shit about the poster…. Not that Hank gives a s*it… BUT >>>>

    Please refrain from personal attacks and using other posters’ nicknames. Report possible comment violations to weblog@wichitaeagle.com.

  101. Posted May 13, 2008 at 1:41 pm | Permalink

    At least I dont post a bunch of BS about the ancient, 8,000 year old universe… like SOME folks here do!! ROFL!!

  102. HLP
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 1:42 pm | Permalink

    Good afternoon Farmgirl!

    I seriously doubt that my post to the most reverend Chas. is original. Go ahead and use it.

    The crying shame is that after 21 years in the submarine force my greatest lines can no longer be used in public since I’m now a “damned fundamentalist waccko!!”

    Twenty years ago I wouldn’t bother to respond to the likes of the good, most reverend Chas., I would have just stepped on him.

    He’s lucky I’m born again!

  103. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 1:44 pm | Permalink

    May 13th, 2008.

    Chas,

    I still have not been contacted by anyone. It is not fair having you hold this over my head. Just let me know the truth that you didn’t contact anyone so I can stop worrying about the charges I might be facing.

  104. Posted May 13, 2008 at 1:46 pm | Permalink

    KFG — Exactly what is it you find so friggin funny about Hank’s self-righteous, holier than thou post?? And remember, Hank is one of those folks who supported the “hate amendment”

  105. HLP
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 1:47 pm | Permalink

    Hey boy!

    I thought you were working, otherwise I wouldn’t have taken a shot at your favorite target!

    Come over to the clinic after while, I have something for you.

    Love ya,

    Pa

  106. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 1:49 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    Exactly what makes you a Christian?

    -You don’t believe much of anything the Bible says.

    -You don’t believe that Christ is the way to Salvation.

    So why do you think you are a Christian?

  107. Posted May 13, 2008 at 1:49 pm | Permalink

    Nathan –

    What is done, is done… It is not in my hands… The timeline is not mine… Stop making a total ass of yourself every day. This is the last response you will get from me to your stupid question.

  108. American_Way
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 1:59 pm | Permalink

    “good goddam WHO wrote it,”

    Chas, was that a deliberate CAP LOCK and use of God’s name in vain, or was that the stroke?

  109. HLP
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:03 pm | Permalink

    Ah, Chas., my veracity challenged friend, you have absolutly no idea of my personal thoughts concerning what you so elequantly term the “hate ammendment”. I’ve never expressed my feelings toward it here or anywhere else publically.

    Furthermore, my fundephobic friend, you have no idea of the position of my church on said amendment since I’ve never talked about my church here either.

    So, to be fair, why don’t you tell us what you did to actually support gay rights lately. Have you testified in legislative committees like the good Farm Girl? Have you sacrificed time and money? Have you risked your job?

    Or, are you again and continually full of excrement?

  110. American_Way
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:03 pm | Permalink

    “What is done, is done… It is not in my hands… The timeline is not mine…”

    Does that mean New Orleans for the Courts-martial is still a go? Mardi Gras for the Weblog blogging teams?

    Sorry for your continual anguish Nathan at the hands of this preacher, but I was looking forward to the trial as I have not been to 4thMarDiv HQ or NO.

  111. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    Why is it ok for you to mock the belief of my father and those who believe in a Young Earth yet you cry and whine anytime we question yours?

  112. Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:09 pm | Permalink

    Hank so wrongfully pontificates >>>>

    “So, to be fair, why don’t you tell us what you did to actually support gay rights lately. Have you testified in legislative committees like the good Farm Girl? Have you sacrificed time and money? Have you risked your job?”

    Short answer to your three questions: HELL YES!!

  113. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:10 pm | Permalink

    American Way,

    Perhaps we need to go there and acout out the territory and “prepare” for my defense with some crawfish and drinks?

  114. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:11 pm | Permalink

    acout = scout

  115. Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:12 pm | Permalink

    Dear Members and Friends of The Clergy Letter Project,

    I am thrilled to report that The United Methodist Church, at its General Convention just concluded, endorsed The Clergy Letter Project. The resolution that was overwhelmingly passed at the General Convention, which meets once every four years, adds a statement to the Book of Resolution that reads as follows: “The United Methodist Church endorses The Clergy Letter Project and its reconciliatory programs between religion and science, and urges United Methodist clergy participation.”

    The General Convention also adopted two other resolutions that are very supportive of evolution. The first explicitly adds the acceptance of evolution to the Methodist’s Book of Discipline. In part, the resolution states that “We find that science’s descriptions of cosmological, geological, and biological evolution are not in conflict with theology.”

    You can read the full resolution here: http://calms.umc.org/2008/Text.aspx?mode=Petition&Number=50.

    The final resolution adds a new statement to the Methodist’s Book of Resolution dealing with creationism and intelligent design. The wording reads as follows, “Therefore be it resolved that the General Conference of the United Methodist Church go on record as opposing the introduction of any faith-based theories such as Creationism or Intelligent Design into the science curriculum of our public schools.”

    This is fabulous news and we owe a debt of gratitude to Daniel Oertel, Al Kuelling and the Kansas East Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church, respectively, for making these three resolutions possible. Please help spread the word about this good news.

    Now let me provide an update on Evolution Weekend 2009 (13-15 February). I’m delighted to say that we’ve never had so many congregations sign up to participate so early! As of this morning, we already have 95 congregations representing 38 states and five countries scheduled to participate. I plan on posting the web site in a few weeks, hopefully when all states have representatives. If you have not yet signed up to participate with your congregation, please think about doing so. Simply drop me a note (mz@butler.edu) and I’ll get you listed.

    Let me close this note, and my plea for participation in Evolution Weekend this coming year, with words spoken by the Archbishop of Canterbury (Rowan Williams) at his Holy Week Lecture on Faith and Science (17 March 2008): “One of the many great men buried in this Abbey is Charles Darwin. If you read the biographies you’ll discover that at Darwin’s death a number of his friends and associates were getting ready for a battle-royal over where he should be buried. And it was a dog that didn’t bark. The ecclesiastical establishment at the Abbey and elsewhere, welcomed Darwin’s burial in their midst. Distinguished clergy preached obituary sermons about Darwin, underlining the ethos of the work, the spirit of attention, the spirit of selflessness. The Bishop of Gloucester preached a sermon in which he – somewhat complacently – observed that in no other country in Europe would a distinguished agnostic scientist be buried in a Christian place of worship; and whether or not he was right about that, it’s a very significant witness to the fact that the stand-off between faith and science, even between faith and Darwin, was not always what we might imagine it to be. And that attitude to Darwin represented by his burial in this place, is perhaps a good model for seeing the centrality, in our thinking about faith and science, of practice.”

    You can read the full lecture at http://www.archbishopofcanterbury.org/1710.

    Please remember that 12 February 2009 is the 200th anniversary of the birth of Darwin and the year is the 150th anniversary of the publication of On the Origin of Species. Participation in Evolution Weekend is not meant to deify Darwin but to demonstrate the strong, positive interactions that religion and science can have. It is an opportunity to elevate the quality of the dialogue about this important relationship. Doing so is no less critical now than it has been since the legislatures of various states are currently attempting to move forward with legislation that would permit narrow religious instruction to become a part of the public school science classroom. Similarly, a group in England is moving forward with plans to build a multi-million dollar creationist theme park, similar to the one recently opened in Kentucky. Religious leaders and scientists need to band together to demonstrate to the public that religion and science need not be at war with one another.

    Please participate and please spread the word about The Clergy Letter Project. Together we are helping to shape perceptions around the globe.

    As always, thank you for you continued support.

    Michael

    Michael Zimmerman
    Office of the Dean
    College of Liberal Arts and Sciences
    Butler University
    Indianapolis, IN 46208

    Tel: 317.940.9224
    Fax: 317.940.8815

    mz@butler.edu

  116. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:15 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    I see alot of political statements, but not much religious there.

    Shouldn’t the church be more worried about preaching God’s word rather than being so political and trying to make themselves look good to the world by fitting in?

  117. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    Nevermind. What was I thinking?

    You are not even a Christian, so why should I expect you to know what I am talking about.

  118. Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:24 pm | Permalink

    I SUPPORT THOSE VIEWS OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH. I GUESS NATHAN THINKS THAT THE SECOND LARGEST PROTESTANT DENOMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES ISNT CHRISTIAN EITHER!! WHAT AN UTTER A** NATHAN PROVES TO BE DAILY!!

  119. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

    I think this quote sums it up rather well:

    “These pastors have signed a statement that inappropriately forces the integration of evolution into the text of the Bible, or worse, reduces the Bible to allegorical ‘moral stories’… Beginning with the Bible, it is simply impossible to arrive at evolution. These 10,200 pastors arrogantly or ignorantly deviate from Christian tradition and orthodoxy by claiming their opinions trump the thousands of years of tradition and the plain reading of the Bible. The relativistic language, “forms of truth,” confirms that this is an appeal to pastors duped by the cultural influence of tolerance.”

    Jefferson Reed

  120. cosmos_originally
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:26 pm | Permalink

    “What are the chances that the Greens’ farm science is any more honest than the IPCC’s global warming “science”?”

    Written by Dennis Avery, who does not know the difference between science and nonsense.

    And who lies about climate scientists.

    ‘Outrage in the Climate Science Community Continues Over the “500 Scientist” List’
    http://www.desmogblog.com/outrage-in-the-climate-science-community-continues-over-the-500-scientist-list
    “Earlier today we broke the story about dozens of scientists outraged at the use of their good names in an article by Heartland Institute’s “Senior Fellow” Dennis Avery (pictured above) posted on their website entitled 500 Scientists with Documented Doubts of Man-Made Global Warming Scares.”

    See link for quotes from some of the scientists.

  121. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:26 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    I don’t think you are a Christian.

    I think those Churches are wrong and have abadoned the scripture for society wanting to feel good and fit in.

  122. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:28 pm | Permalink

    So Chas, was it the stroke which caused you to type in caps or did you mean to do it that time?

  123. Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:28 pm | Permalink

    NATHAN — Why dont you take it up with the two United Methodist Pastors in Kansas East Conference. They are listed above. And you can find their email addresses and phone numbers on the Kansas East Web Site…

    http://www.kswestumc.org

  124. Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:31 pm | Permalink

    Who is Jefferson Reed, and what is he talking about?

  125. HLP
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:32 pm | Permalink

    Well boy,

    Chas., may have a point. If the “VIEWS OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH” are such that we must now accept Darwin as a modern day prophet, who are we to protest?

  126. Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:32 pm | Permalink

    And where do you find politics in the United Methodist Resolution??

  127. bth
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:33 pm | Permalink

    Maybe the Catholic Church isn’t the Whore of Babylon after all?

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24599419

    “WASHINGTON – John Hagee, an influential televangelist who endorsed John McCain, is apologizing to Catholics for referring to the Roman Catholic Church as “the great whore” and calling it “the apostate church.”"

    Does that mean Hagee hated Catholics before he liked them?

  128. Boxlock
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    Ever wonder how to say thank you when you see a military person in uniform?
    See a simple way to do it from across a room or as you are passing by.

    Click here to download the movie:
    http://www.gratitudecampaign.org/fullmovie.php

  129. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:36 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    The mere fact that a bunch of Pastors and Chruches feel it neccisary to write a letter saying how they all denounce creationism and agree with Evolutionary Theory is what makes them political.

    Duh.

  130. Predestined
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:37 pm | Permalink

    Anyone want to make a stab at why the U.S. Senate website is down? I’m trying to find a possibly upcoming bill (S1353). The House bill, HR2060, isn’t available.

  131. StevenEDavis
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:37 pm | Permalink

    “Just let me know the truth that you didn’t contact anyone so I can stop worrying about the charges I might be facing.”

    I assume this is sarcasm. Chas has sent me an email telling me what he did about his concerns regarding you and your posts. I know nothing about this organization he contacted.

    Honestly, it is hard for me to believe that any official government body would be the least bit concerned with purveyors of dogma. There is just way too much religious intolerance around, for anybody to grandiose enough to think that they could stamp it out. These are the reasons why I think any action happening is very unlikely.

  132. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:39 pm | Permalink

    Believe me Chas, I have.

    I can’t stop people like you from turning their backs on Christianity for society.

    I can continue to point out that you are not a Christian and that what you do is to lead people away from Salvation.

    You can call yourself a Christian all you want to Chas, just as I can continue to point out that you are not one.

  133. Predestined
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:40 pm | Permalink

    “I doubt that the journalists at the New York Times and NPR or at ABC or at CNN are going to ever admit just how wrong their negative pronouncements were over the past four weeks.”
    (MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough, 4/9/03)

    Scarborough has done an about face on the administration and half of an about face on Iraq. Apparently Katrina opened his eyes.

    Thank you, Joe.

  134. Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:40 pm | Permalink

    Wwell, I shouldnt have expected to get an intelligent answer from a Young Earth Theory, Ultra Divine poster… But I thought, well, MAYbe I might!!

    Sorry Nathan, Those clergy are expressing theological matters pertaining to their faith… And YOU define that as political??

  135. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:41 pm | Permalink

    Steven,

    Yes, I was being sarcastic.

    Even if whoever Chas wrote to did care, they can’t do anything about it.

    If it was an anonymous complaint as Chas claims, why would they take it very seriously anyhow?

  136. Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:41 pm | Permalink

    Oh, excuse me… Young Earth is a superstition, not a theory… my bad!!

  137. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    Please tell me where accepting Evolutionary Theory is a matter of faith?

  138. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:43 pm | Permalink

    Could you imagine the stupidy of the proponents of Intelligent Design using a letter campaign from a group of Cleregy to support themselves?

    So why on Earth would it be any less absurd for you or anyone else to be out trying to get Pastors and Churches to sign onto Evolutionary Theory?

    It is nothing but some political statement.

  139. Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:44 pm | Permalink

    Naathan — where did I say it was anonymnous?

    Steven – Yes, there is something that can be done.

  140. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    If Young Earth is a superstition then so is your faith as well.

    I always love the irony of someone who believes in god trying to say that something which someone else believes is a superstition or myth…

  141. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:46 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    Remember when I told you how excited I was to finally be able to back track this complaint to you so that I could tell your superiors about your language and attitude on this blog?

    You said I couldn’t do that because it was an anonymous complaint.

    Well, if it is not, then I hope they do contact me.

  142. Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:47 pm | Permalink

    You would be correct, Nathan. Matters of faith, are by and large, superstition.

    Evolution, etc. are matters of science. not matters of faith. Superstitious beliefs cannot be used to over turn scientific theory..

  143. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:47 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    Please tell me what can be done?

    Because I think you are full of crap. There is nothing they can do to me.

  144. HLP
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Boxlock!

    You have a convert! I stopped and talked to a young soldier in SeaTac airport on Sunday. Told him how much I aprreciated his service.

    I now have a way to show may appreciation when there’s not enough time to stop or if I’m accross the room.

    The recent stats on recruitment and reenlistments give me hope for the future of our country. Don’t miss a chance to say, “Thanks”

  145. StevenEDavis
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:52 pm | Permalink

    Nathan,

    I thought it was your group who tried to conflate regilious faith and an acceptance of evolutionary theory.

    I hope that your above posts suggests you see these as fundamentally different things – because they are. Faith you believe in the absence of proof or empiricism. Science requires evidence. Very different standards.

  146. Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:56 pm | Permalink

    Nathan, for the LAST time — As you have been told before, even though you continue to LIE about it, I did not file a complaint, nor did I claim to file a complaint.

    So, stop lying about that. I very explicitly sstated that you would not have your Marine career threatened, nor any courts martial, or any of the Bull Shit you and your little Goons keep whining about…

    That is the LAST time I am going to say that… I feel it is a serious matter…. I have colleagues who agree…. Thus, what I have done, I have done…

    You are not required to believe it, if you dont want to believe it… But you will see… And you will also know that it doesnt really matter WHAT you believe about MY FAITH!! You can make all of the accusations you want… It changes nothing…

    Ultimately, Nathan, YOU are nothing!! So, carry on, Marine Boy!! What I have done, I have done… plain and simple…

    Steven, if you are still here, drop me a note…

  147. Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    Here’s how you win elections–

    http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/vfc_landing_page/

    And it’s why the RepubliCONs drive down the public’s interest in all things political by making the process as nasty as possible.

  148. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:58 pm | Permalink

    Steven,

    Here is the difference.

    You have one group who starts with faith and what teh Bible says and sees Evolutionary Theory in conflict with this.

    You have another group who starts with Evolutionary Theory and sees the Bible and faith in conflict with this.

    If you are a group based on faith and the Bible your goals shouldn’t be to conform with Evolutionary Theory or teach such.

    Of course I understand the difference between faith and science.

  149. gster
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:59 pm | Permalink

    Chas- When are you going to learn to hit the ignore button in these daily situations?

  150. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

    I like those crawfish too Nathan/AmWay, but I never came so close to starving to death, then the time I spent 2 hours in New Orleans eating those lil things. If it wasn’t for the beer, I wouldn’t have survived.

  151. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    You told Steven that something could be done.

    What is it?

    Otherwise you are just full of crap as usual.

  152. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:02 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    And you can claim to be a Christian all you want to. It changes nothing about you actually being one.

  153. Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:03 pm | Permalink

    Nathan writes >>>>

    “If you are a group based on faith and the Bible your goals shouldn’t be to conform with Evolutionary Theory or teach such.”
    =============================================

    THAT Nathan, is your basic fallacy. See, there are millions who see Evolution; and are faith based; and see absolutely no contradiction between the two… The FACT that you are unable to do that, makes you an extremely rigid individual… And yet at the same time, you CLAIM to have no problem with science… Except for that you basically wipe out ALL of science with your Young Earth superstition!!

  154. DavidB
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    Another of his tricks is the Straw Man Tactic of Debate. He makes a false claim about his opponent, and then attacks the opponent for the ’sin’ Max falsely attributes to his target.

    Liberals only want to tax non-liberals?? Gawd knows how he made that up – what tortured logic he uses to invent such a false statement.

    I think is a shame that all that energy is used to cloud issues, rather than to actually argue the issues at hand.

    Obama has no plans? http://www.barackobama.com/issues/

  155. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:05 pm | Permalink

    dem ain’t crawfish, dems mudbugs…

  156. HLP
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    Good afternoon Steven!

    Actually do to the lack of any real evidence that evolution is true I’m afraid it takes a lot more faith to believe in evolution than creation!

    Many of the things that evolution should be able to predict are answered instead by creation!

    So. . . I must admit, your faith is greater than mine!

  157. StevenEDavis
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:09 pm | Permalink

    Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:02 pm | Permalink
    Chas,

    And you can claim to be a Christian all you want to. It changes nothing about you actually being one.
    **********
    Since Chas responded to your other post, I will respond to this. It would the full extent of arrogance to assume that you know very much about Chas at all, based on his posts here. It is possible for you to be wrong about him. Do think the foregoring is possible? Simple question, please answer it.

  158. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:12 pm | Permalink

    The height of arrogance Steven Davis, is butting in on other people’s discussion.

    Or you feel Chas is just too weak to defend himself?

  159. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:13 pm | Permalink

    Steven,

    Based on Chas’s answers to my questions about Christ, I am left to believe that he is not a Christian.

    Do I believe he could be a minister? Sure.

    Do I believe he could be a minister in an alleged “Christian” denomination? Maybe.

    But, is Chas, a Christian? He has yet to show me how he is one.

    He evades questions and gives half answers where any Christian shouldn’t need to.

    That is why I can very easily conclude that he is not one.

  160. StevenEDavis
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:13 pm | Permalink

    A simpler question yet. If Chas believes differently than you, is that enough to conclude that he is not a Christian? Last I checked there were more than one demonination of Christians, hence suggesting that people can see things differently and still call themselves Christians.

  161. StevenEDavis
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:16 pm | Permalink

    “The height of arrogance Steven Davis, is butting in on other people’s discussion.

    “Or you feel Chas is just too weak to defend himself?”

    Thanks for your valuable feedback, James. I have R.L. calling right now. Will be back later.

    James, do you fail to see the irony that you are “butting in”, too, my irony impaired friend?

  162. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    So Steven Davis, you are admitting Chas is too weak to argue for himself.

  163. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    Steven,

    I have been to many different denominations. I completely understand that there are a multitude of little things which differetn denominations believe. I don’t think those types of things make a difference.

    The ultimate thing which makes someone a Christian is not their belief in Creation vs. Evolution. It is your belief in Christ.

    Based on the way Chas answers question about Christ, I have concluded he is not a Christian.

    A Christian shouldn’t need to elude questions about Christ or only give half answers. And based on the answers Chas has given, he is no Christian.

  164. Mary_Caruso
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    If Chas believes that Christ is God, then he is a Christian by all definitions, Nathan.

  165. StevenEDavis
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:38 pm | Permalink

    Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:17 pm | Permalink
    So Steven Davis, you are admitting Chas is too weak to argue for himself.
    *****
    Kindly prove that.

  166. StevenEDavis
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:39 pm | Permalink

    Now, Mary, you are butting into this private conversation on this public blog…

  167. StevenEDavis
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:42 pm | Permalink

    Still Nathan,

    Can you prove that Chas is not a Christian? You could conclude that Regular is a figment of all of our imaginations, that in itself would not make it true. I am just asking for a little humility from you – the Christians I know value humility. How about you, Nathan?

  168. StevenEDavis
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:44 pm | Permalink

    R.L. calling again. Back later.

  169. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:46 pm | Permalink

    DavidB
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    Obama has no plans? http://www.barackobama.com/issues/
    ————————————————–

    WOW David. I posted links to Obama’s site hours ago.

    If you would actually bother to READ the “Plans” on Obama’s web site, you would see there are no Plans.

    Just sweeping generalizations, and sound bytes. Sounds Pretty though.

  170. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:49 pm | Permalink

    MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:54 am | Permalink
    Yeah, check out Obama’s Fiscal plan!

    See how GENERAL this is!

    For example:

    Reverse Bush Tax Cuts for the Wealthy: Obama will protect tax cuts for poor and middle class families, but he will reverse most of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest taxpayers.

    What dollar amount is “Wealthy”? WTF!?!

    http://www.barackobama.com/issues/fiscal/

    http://www.barackobama.com/issues/fiscal/ObamaPolicy_Fiscal.pdf

    (From the mouth’s own web site!)

  171. LLTVET
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 4:33 pm | Permalink

    So Nathaniel you are the authority of who is a Christian and who is not. All because someone doesn’t agree that Christ is the way to salvation. Because they don’t believe the Bible in the same way that you do. Here is reality Nathaniel. You have no more authority, nor any more epistemology in ascertaining what parts of the Bible are Literall (or as fundies like to say “VERILY VERILY”) and what parts are to be taken in context. Given this tidbit of reality, why should anyone here give a rat’s ass about whether you consider chas a Christian or not?

  172. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

    Steven,

    If Chas’s own words about Christ doesn’t prove that he is not Christian, then what would?

    That is exactly what a base my saying he is not Christian on.

    This has nothing to do with humility.

  173. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 4:35 pm | Permalink

    Mary,

    If that is what Chas believed, perhaps.

  174. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    LLTVET,

    “All because someone doesn’t agree that Christ is the way to salvation.”

    That is exactly one of the reasons why Chas is not a Christian.

  175. LLTVET
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 4:39 pm | Permalink

    Wrong nathaniel. It merely proves that he is not YOUR TYPE of Christian. Nothing more. Another Reality, You don’t get to decide who is a Christian and who is not. It is not your job to make that decision, it is God’s Job. So why not get over yourself and let God do his job chief?

  176. Mary_Caruso
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 4:44 pm | Permalink

    Anyone who believes that Christ is God is a Christian….saying that, I would imagine that if hell exists, there are many Christians there.

  177. Mary_Caruso
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 4:45 pm | Permalink

    On the other hand…I would imagine if Heaven exists, there are many non-Christians there, too.

  178. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 4:54 pm | Permalink

    LLTVET,

    Ok then. So is everyone a Christian or is there a standard? What is that standard?

  179. parkay
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    Attorney General Stephen SixSixSix actively undermined Johnson County District Attorney Phill Kline’s prosecution of 107 criminal charges against Planned Parenthood’s second-trimester Overland Park abortion mill, particularly obstructing the presentation of the evidence known to incriminate Planned Parenthood for falsifying records. Immediately after DA Kline subpoenaed Judge Anderson to produce documents which included a series of letters and other papers regarding KDH&E records that had, according to Judge Anderson, been improperly altered or manufactured, but containing no private medical information, AG SixSixSix filed a motion asking for a protective order on all information related to Kline’s inquisition, and asking that the High Court quash Kline’s subpoena to Anderson. The following day the “court” ordered Judge Anderson not to appear, and not to present any of the incriminating evidence. (Judge Anderson testified in Tatum’s “court” in January that he had records that were falsified by Planned Parenthood.) On April 28, “judge” Tatum ruled that the KDH&E did not have to honor another subpoena from Kline, although KDH&E does not possess private medical information such as the names or addresses of the mothers, either.
    Pro-lifers are calling for “judge” Tatum to recuse himself and face charges of obstruction of justice, under a federal conspiracy investigation.
    This is clearly a widespread criminal conspiracy in the Kansas executive and judicial branches to obstruct justice and prevent enforcement of state laws and medical regulations regulating and restricting abortion mills – a conspiracy orchestrated by the paid puppets of Planned Parenthood, carefully placed in Kansas government by the pro-abortion, unelected, unaccountable judicial nominating commissions, and the Democrat party that collects its sizable share of the blood-soaked abortion mill profits every year.
    O, for lawmakers and a House Speaker with spines to stand for the rule by law, rather than rule by abortionist quacks, and to impeach the conspirators.
    - – -

    Rev. John Hagee, an influential televangelist who endorsed John McCain, is apologizing to Catholics [except, of course, for Bilious Sebelius] for referring to them as “the great whore” of scripture.
    (Revelation 17:1-18)
    - – -

    Ellie-Suzanne Fish was born four months premature at 23 weeks. She weighed a little more than 1 pound and was given a 10 to 15% survival chance. But today, at 9 months old, Ellie-Suzanne weighs 14 pounds and finally has been released from the hospital. She was born in England with cerebral palsy, has had 3 operations, requires a feeding tube and extra oxygen, and needs her airways suctioned. Her fight for life has defied medical expectations.
    Likely there are British judges somewhere itching to order this baby’s execution by a brutal 13-day starvation, just like the USofA does for its disabled people.

  180. Mary_Caruso
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

    The standard is that anyone who belives that Jesus Christ is God is a Christian…from there it goes into numerous interpetations of the Bible. There are many sects of Christianity.
    You believe what you believe, Nathan. Your beliefs don’t invalidate what other Christians believe.
    There are probably other Christians on this blog that believe your soul is doomed, also.

  181. Mary_Caruso
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:09 pm | Permalink

    Parkay…I’m prolife and you even get on MY nerves!

  182. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:12 pm | Permalink

    Mary,

    Part of believing that Christ is God is believing he is THE God.

    Chas has clearly indicated on many occasions that Christ is only God for Christians. He has refused to acknowledge that Christ is GOD, not just a God.

    He eludes questions and has refused to be clear on what he believes about Christ.

    A Christian doesn’t do those things.

    Chas is about as Christian as I am Muslim, simply because I claim it to be so.

  183. Hud
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:15 pm | Permalink

    “The standard is that anyone who belives that Jesus Christ is God is a Christian…”

    By this definition, Satan is a Christian.

  184. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:17 pm | Permalink

    Hud,

    Exactly.

  185. LLTVET
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:20 pm | Permalink

    Nathanial: Why don’t you stop worrying about being the sheriff of Christian Standards? I don’t presume to know what the “standard” of a Christian is. Do I need to say it again? It ain’t my job to define that. It ain’t your job to define that.

  186. Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:22 pm | Permalink

    Hmmmm Nathan now professes belief that Satan is a Christian… Good grief!!

  187. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:24 pm | Permalink

    LLTVET,

    I am not defining it. Christ himself did that. As does the rest of the Bible.

    I use those standards.

    It is common sense. If someone claims to be a Marine, but they have never been to boot camp or even served in the Marine Corps, are they a Marine?

    Simply because Chas claims to be a Christian doesn’t make him one. His views or lack thereof on Christ is what makes him NOT a Christian.

  188. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:24 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    I said no such thing. Learn how to read.

  189. Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:27 pm | Permalink

    Hud
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:15 pm | Permalink
    “The standard is that anyone who belives that Jesus Christ is God is a Christian…”

    By this definition, Satan is a Christian.

    Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:17 pm | Permalink
    Hud,

    Exactly.
    ============================================

    Sorry Nathan, you agreed with Hud’s statement… You want to try to spin out of that one??

  190. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:28 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    Hud clearly said: “By this definition”

    Learn how to read.

  191. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:29 pm | Permalink

    While you are here Chas, why don’t you go ahead and tell us what it is that you believe about Christ?

  192. Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:30 pm | Permalink

    Nathan, YOU gave the damn definition upthread!! YOU agreed with your own definition!! Unless you dont believe that definition now…

  193. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:32 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    Is it the stroke making you type in caps or was that by choice?

  194. Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:34 pm | Permalink

    Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:12 pm | Permalink
    Mary,

    Part of believing that Christ is God is believing he is THE God.
    =========================================

    That is YOUR definition, you fruit cake!!

    THEN, you agreed with Hud that Satan believes Christ is God….

    Therefore you agreed that Satan is a Christian!! Now you done went and done it!! You just showed us all what you are!!

  195. Hud
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:34 pm | Permalink

    Chas is this the definition Nathan posted?

    Mary_Caruso
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 4:44 pm | Permalink
    Anyone who believes that Christ is God is a Christian….saying that, I would imagine that if hell exists, there are many Christians there.

  196. lindainks55
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:35 pm | Permalink

    Chas, you’re giving permission to be questioned by allowing yourself to participate. Don’t give them any power over you. They already think they have the power to judge humanity. But if you enjoy going back and forth GO FOR IT and enjoy!

  197. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:37 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    That was not a definition, it was a statement. You are trying to link several things together to form your conclusion.

    So why don’t you just clear the air up here and tell us what you believe about Christ?

  198. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:38 pm | Permalink

    Linda,

    Who is this “they” that thinks they have permission to judge humanity?

    If you are simply going to come into the discussion telling lies, then why bother?

  199. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:40 pm | Permalink

    Rings Dinner Bell…

    Red Beans with ham hocks, fresh collard greens and fresh from the oven corn bread, butter and clover honey. Ice tea or coffee.

  200. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:42 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    Why do you run from the questions?

    A real Christian wouldn’t hide from professing his faith in Christ and what that faith is.

    Lets hear it.

  201. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:42 pm | Permalink

    Oh BTW Nathan,

    You do know I was kidding about “calling me sir” right?

    Sorry, hard to put that “twinkle in the eye on a blog.” :)

  202. Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:46 pm | Permalink

    You’re right Linda — I am done with this lying bunch of bigots… They will get theirs some day!!

  203. BlueJay
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:47 pm | Permalink

    Gotta agree with linda Chas.

    You accomplish nothing arguing with the Price’s.

    They know everything.

    Well, except that bit about humility and bearing false witness.

    You are a FAR better person than either of them or both put together. Regard them as you would a bit of poo you encounter on a walk. Consider them as part of the landscape, not your fault, and pass ‘em by.

  204. lindainks55
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:48 pm | Permalink

    That’s good Chas! You know who you are accountable to and it isn’t anyone on this blog. ;-)

  205. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:48 pm | Permalink

    Regular,

    I’m fine. No Problem.

  206. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:51 pm | Permalink

    Linda,

    LOL, do you honesly think that Chas has gotten it?

    Are your really that naive?

    Care to wager any money on it?

  207. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:53 pm | Permalink

    Linda,

    If you noticed, I didn’t start this till Chas decided he was going to mock my father for believing in a Young Earth.

    As usual, you liberals can dish it out, but as soon as any of it is directed your way, you run and cry.

  208. sursum
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 6:00 pm | Permalink

    Nathaniel: Sometimes I think you get your posts from The Inqusition Handbook when deciding who is a Christian and who will go to hell….. after we burn him at the stake of course. Did you get the original Latin version, or was it translated to the vulgate of Spanish?

  209. BlueJay
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 6:07 pm | Permalink

    A quick look shows…

    Chas posted a very thoughtful bit of prose.

    And Hank shot off his mouth.

    Just for the record.

  210. Posted May 13, 2008 at 6:09 pm | Permalink

    Dear Members and Friends of The Clergy Letter Project,

    I am thrilled to report that The United Methodist Church, at its General Convention just concluded, endorsed The Clergy Letter Project. The resolution that was overwhelmingly passed at the General Convention, which meets once every four years, adds a statement to the Book of Resolution that reads as follows: “The United Methodist Church endorses The Clergy Letter Project and its reconciliatory programs between religion and science, and urges United Methodist clergy participation.”

    The General Convention also adopted two other resolutions that are very supportive of evolution. The first explicitly adds the acceptance of evolution to the Methodist’s Book of Discipline. In part, the resolution states that “We find that science’s descriptions of cosmological, geological, and biological evolution are not in conflict with theology.”

    You can read the full resolution here: http://calms.umc.org/2008/Text.aspx?mode=Petition&Number=50.

    The final resolution adds a new statement to the Methodist’s Book of Resolution dealing with creationism and intelligent design. The wording reads as follows, “Therefore be it resolved that the General Conference of the United Methodist Church go on record as opposing the introduction of any faith-based theories such as Creationism or Intelligent Design into the science curriculum of our public schools.”

    This is fabulous news and we owe a debt of gratitude to Daniel Oertel, Al Kuelling and the Kansas East Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church, respectively, for making these three resolutions possible. Please help spread the word about this good news.

    Now let me provide an update on Evolution Weekend 2009 (13-15 February). I’m delighted to say that we’ve never had so many congregations sign up to participate so early! As of this morning, we already have 95 congregations representing 38 states and five countries scheduled to participate. I plan on posting the web site in a few weeks, hopefully when all states have representatives. If you have not yet signed up to participate with your congregation, please think about doing so. Simply drop me a note (mz@butler.edu) and I’ll get you listed.

    Let me close this note, and my plea for participation in Evolution Weekend this coming year, with words spoken by the Archbishop of Canterbury (Rowan Williams) at his Holy Week Lecture on Faith and Science (17 March 2008): “One of the many great men buried in this Abbey is Charles Darwin. If you read the biographies you’ll discover that at Darwin’s death a number of his friends and associates were getting ready for a battle-royal over where he should be buried. And it was a dog that didn’t bark. The ecclesiastical establishment at the Abbey and elsewhere, welcomed Darwin’s burial in their midst. Distinguished clergy preached obituary sermons about Darwin, underlining the ethos of the work, the spirit of attention, the spirit of selflessness. The Bishop of Gloucester preached a sermon in which he – somewhat complacently – observed that in no other country in Europe would a distinguished agnostic scientist be buried in a Christian place of worship; and whether or not he was right about that, it’s a very significant witness to the fact that the stand-off between faith and science, even between faith and Darwin, was not always what we might imagine it to be. And that attitude to Darwin represented by his burial in this place, is perhaps a good model for seeing the centrality, in our thinking about faith and science, of practice.”

    You can read the full lecture at http://www.archbishopofcanterbury.org/1710.

    Please remember that 12 February 2009 is the 200th anniversary of the birth of Darwin and the year is the 150th anniversary of the publication of On the Origin of Species. Participation in Evolution Weekend is not meant to deify Darwin but to demonstrate the strong, positive interactions that religion and science can have. It is an opportunity to elevate the quality of the dialogue about this important relationship. Doing so is no less critical now than it has been since the legislatures of various states are currently attempting to move forward with legislation that would permit narrow religious instruction to become a part of the public school science classroom. Similarly, a group in England is moving forward with plans to build a multi-million dollar creationist theme park, similar to the one recently opened in Kentucky. Religious leaders and scientists need to band together to demonstrate to the public that religion and science need not be at war with one another.

    Please participate and please spread the word about The Clergy Letter Project. Together we are helping to shape perceptions around the globe.

    As always, thank you for you continued support.

    Michael Zimmerman
    Office of the Dean
    College of Liberal Arts and Sciences
    Butler University
    Indianapolis, IN 46208

    Tel: 317.940.9224
    Fax: 317.940.8815
    mz@butler.edu

  211. Posted May 13, 2008 at 6:13 pm | Permalink

    Lord Lead us not into temptation; but Deliver us from those who think they’re You!

  212. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 6:14 pm | Permalink

    “These pastors have signed a statement that inappropriately forces the integration of evolution into the text of the Bible, or worse, reduces the Bible to allegorical ‘moral stories’… Beginning with the Bible, it is simply impossible to arrive at evolution. These 10,200 pastors arrogantly or ignorantly deviate from Christian tradition and orthodoxy by claiming their opinions trump the thousands of years of tradition and the plain reading of the Bible. The relativistic language, “forms of truth,” confirms that this is an appeal to pastors duped by the cultural influence of tolerance.”

    Jefferson Reed

  213. LLTVET
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 6:19 pm | Permalink

    Nathaniel: Strange that you mention being a Marine in the same way that you mention being a Christian. Ok, I will use the “regulation” to show that you indeed are not a Christian. Let’s start out with the notion a christian is to, and I quote “greet one another with a holy kiss.” Now I may presume that you dont (safe bet) but you will no doubt tell me that I don’t interpret Romans 16:16. correctly. That it isn’t literal. But, of course the salvation part is literal. Once again with no epistemology to back it up. It is your belief Nathan. Not a fact. The standards apply to your life, but they don’t have to apply to mine.

  214. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 6:27 pm | Permalink

    Self-Service Express Airport Parking Opens

    Date: May 13, 2008
    Contact: Valerie Wise, Air Service & Business Development Manager
    : VWise@wichita.gov
    : (316) 946-4700

    Exiting the long-term and short-term parking lots at Mid-Continent Airport just got easier. Customers can now pay parking charges by using a self-service express lane.

    Rather than waiting in line to pay a cashier, the lane provides a machine that will accept debit or credit cards; an easy-to-use instruction screen guides customers through the process. Insert the ticket that you received when entering the lot, then insert your credit card. The transaction takes a few seconds.

    The following credit cards are accepted: Visa, MasterCard, American Express, and Discover. The service is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The credit card lane is in close proximity to the cashier if a customer needs assistance.

  215. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 6:34 pm | Permalink

    Evolution forced into the Bible eh?

    Sort of remakes the Bible into an UnHoly book then.

  216. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 6:36 pm | Permalink

    BlueJay
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 6:07 pm | Permalink
    A quick look shows…

    Chas posted a very thoughtful bit of prose.

    And Hank shot off his mouth.

    Just for the record
    ————-
    Chas posted a lie.

    George Carlin didn’t write it.

  217. LLTVET
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 6:38 pm | Permalink

    ah yes Regular. We can’t have evolution in the Bible, then it can’t be used to scare people into submission. The Catholic Church did their job very well creating a fear based reality. Protestants today have the illusion that they are free from that subjegation.

  218. LLTVET
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 6:42 pm | Permalink

    The “plain reading” of the Bible. That snakes talk to women and cause them to eat poisonaous fruit.

  219. LLTVET
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 6:43 pm | Permalink

    oops, “poisonous”

  220. Rage
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 6:50 pm | Permalink

    I think this is an instructive old thread:

    http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/04/one_constituent/

  221. Posted May 13, 2008 at 6:53 pm | Permalink

    I posted a cut/paste — Really good content… It had George Carlin’s name attached to it… I DID NOT PUT GEORGE CARLIN’S NAME ON IT… THEREFORE I POSTED NO LIE, AND REGULAR LIES LIKE ALWAYS!!

  222. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 7:02 pm | Permalink

    Well LLVET,

    I have a liberal interpretation of the Creation story and it is different from Nathan’s, but each is entitled to his own opinion.

    I believe that no man knows the mind of God and I have no clue how long the time was when God created the earth.

    Now, as far as the evolution story entering the Bible, the problem is, who writes it and what version of evolution. Scientists disagree on evolution you know, some minor points and some major points.

    What Holy Man er Scientist or group of Scientist will be chosen to make the entry?

    What if the information changes five years from now and they find out that lizardocious didn’t really come from amphiototoaster but rather a xenophobnaria lizard?

    What if they were wrong about the years and it was 6 billion years instead of 4 billion years?

    Doesn’t all of that uncertainity cheapen the Bible and make it entirely worthless as the Book of God.

    Does it stop being God’s word and become the International Science Council deity derived Drivel Handbook on Making up Crap as We Go?

    Will Churches who adhere to the original translation be considered cults and driven from the mainstream?

    Can Reverend Wright wannabe’s damn America and the defocating dinosaurs as reasons for the confusion of the new term for a soul, energy aura.

    Will archaelogical digs now become holy sites requiring scientists wearing a stole, robe and using heavy water to bless the site?

    Will scientists be required to go to confession once a week to confess their analytical sins?

    Will buzzards be worshipped as sacred recyclers because they have the ass bones of ancient dinosaures?

    Will new Hymns be sung about T-Rex and Cro-Magnon?

    Will offering plates have envelopes for mission studies and evolution museums?

    Will Jurassic Park become the new ‘Passion Play’ and phoenetic foo-pahs along with incorrect spellings of flora and fauna speciation be declared sacrilege and blasphemous?

    Will baptism have to be done in certified, purified and technologically pure – de-ionized, de-mineralized water?

    Will the Neanderthal caves become the new Lords, France and the Nobel Prize winner of Evolution become the new Saint Bernadette?

    and so on and so forth…

  223. Rage
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 7:07 pm | Permalink

    I posted a P.S. that you may not have seen, because it says nice things about a friend of mine, whose motorcycle-influenced nic also is associated with pornography. And is, thus, “awaiting moderation.”

    How dumb it that?

    So, does anyone of even normal intelligence work at Wordpress? It would appear not.

  224. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 7:15 pm | Permalink

    Chas
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 6:53 pm | Permalink
    I posted a cut/paste — Really good content… It had George Carlin’s name attached to it… I DID NOT PUT GEORGE CARLIN’S NAME ON IT… THEREFORE I POSTED NO LIE, AND REGULAR LIES LIKE ALWAYS!!
    ———————–
    Oh you mean when I post a cut and paste and cosmos calls me a liar for a year and a half.

    Right? :)

  225. LLTVET
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 7:18 pm | Permalink

    Well Regular: Do you really think that such ridiculous changes will be made? For some reason, Christians see a slippery slope regarding evolution. I have always maintained that Darwin became irresponsible when he asserted that our existence was by random chance. Such an assertion is only an opinion. It is irresponsible. And is a type of religious dogma.
    But it is almost certain that people “evolve” Darwin’s 7 axioms are inarguably true. (I suppose an argument can be made against #2) However, if all mankind came from Adam, then our several races exist because of “evolution”

    I was merely trying to show Nathanial that the ideas of the Bible are still valid without them having to be “verily verily” This is where the slippery slope shows. According to many Christians that I speak with. If the Bible is not “verily verily” then it is not authoritative and oh no, People like me are going to rape their wife or steal their car.

    With regard to chas being a Christian. I would only wonder if he lives a decent life, shows compassion, tries not to hurt anyone, even himself. Then I certainly can’t exclude him. But, not my call chief.

  226. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 7:20 pm | Permalink

    No slippery slope, more like common sense and literary decorum slipped on the soap.

  227. Rage
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 7:29 pm | Permalink

    LLVET, can’t say I’ve really followed the thread, but thanks for raising the level of debate.

    Period. That’s not a slam on Regular or whoever else. Just an observation.

  228. BlueJay
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 7:30 pm | Permalink

    Carlin HAS used that bit of prose. Both in spoken and written form.

    And James is just another bit of the poo I talked about.

  229. outlander
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 7:30 pm | Permalink

    From Chas’ post:

    “Now let me provide an update on Evolution Weekend 2009 (13-15 February). I’m delighted to say that we’ve never had so many congregations sign up to participate so early! As of this morning, we already have 95 congregations representing 38 states and five countries scheduled to participate.”

    —————-

    Be sure to support your church’s Evolution Weekend” (or is it “Darwin Days”). Rousing games include “pin the tail on the creationist”, “which monkey is my mama?” and the ever popular “survival of the fittest” dodge ball (baseballs) tournament. Refreshments will include “puddle of goo” pudding, and fossilized fruit cake.

    And they say that belief in evolution isn’t faith based. Chuckle….

  230. BlueJay
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 7:38 pm | Permalink

    “Chas decided he was going to mock my father for believing in a Young Earth.”

    People who believe in a young Earth and Noah and all that fairy tale nonsense mock themselves.

  231. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 7:38 pm | Permalink

    BlueJay
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 7:30 pm | Permalink
    Carlin HAS used that bit of prose. Both in spoken and written form.

    And James is just another bit of the poo I talked about.
    ===========================================

    From the Snopes Link:

    George Carlin very emphatically denied he had anything to do with “Paradox,” a piece he referred to as a “sappy load of shit,” and posted his comments about being associated with this essay on his own website.
    http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/paradox.asp

  232. LLTVET
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 7:46 pm | Permalink

    Well Regular, where I come from it sounds like a slippery slope to me. I am going to assume that you understand the fallacy known as the “slippery slope” It certainly seems to creationists that if an inch is given, a mile will be taken. Do I paraphrase the slippery slope incorrectly? Notwithstanding Outlander’s Irony regarding the “puddle of goo” Most Creationists show real fear on the subject thinking that they will lose autonomy.

  233. BlueJay
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 7:49 pm | Permalink

    And I have heard him read it.

  234. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 7:52 pm | Permalink

    I was poking fun at it LLVET – lighten up.

    The whole concept of mixing evolution and biblical text together in one form as a new published volume of the Bible is beyond ridiculous.

    It’s not only an empirical embarrassment, it’s blasmephous to true believers that God’s word is God’s word and the warning that is written in Revelations.

    Revelation 22:18-9:

    “For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and [from] the things which are written in this book.”

  235. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 7:55 pm | Permalink

    BlueJay
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 7:49 pm | Permalink
    And I have heard him read it.
    ——————
    B.S.

    Carlin also stated on his Website, if it did not come from an HBO show, movie, a book or any of his non-Internet publications, it was not him.

    But a nice try Junior on trying to further the lie.

  236. LLTVET
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 8:13 pm | Permalink

    Well Regular. You seem to change tangents quickly. Lighten up and then heed the warnings of Revelation. Maybe I read your post wrong. You seemed to assert that it wasn’t a slippery slope, just common sense. You do understand how a rational mind can see the jumble of your post?

    However, you know as well as I do that you can keep your Bible as “verily verily” as you want. But as long as you understand that if you poke fun of fallacies, I poke fun of GODHATESSHRIMP.COM. I’m supremely confident that is fair enough.

  237. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 8:26 pm | Permalink

    Your assessment is hardly rational LLVET. Like those words “verily, verily” do you? Do you feel the spirit when you say them or is a fleck of spittle running down your face?

    Perhaps if you took more than a tainted breath evaluation of something, you might see the errors in your assessment.

    When your ready to step up let me know, I’ll be around.

  238. Apophis
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 8:29 pm | Permalink

    ………….the troll, little jimmie mac, is well on his way to polishing off yet again hid nightly bottle of rot-gut whiskey!

    Read his posts and watch as he aimlessly reambles on………………..

  239. Apophis
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 8:30 pm | Permalink

    ………….the troll, little jimmie mac, is well on his way to polishing off yet again his nightly bottle of rot-gut whiskey!

    Read his posts and watch as he aimlessly rambles on………………..

  240. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 8:32 pm | Permalink

    Sorry there middle school teacher and public servant, I don’t drink or do illegal drugs and I don’t impatiently click twice on the “post comment” button to double post either.

  241. LLTVET
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 8:40 pm | Permalink

    Regular, why don’t you figure out what a fallacy is. Study them all, then tell me when your ready.
    Oh, and don’t get too upset about my irony surrounding “verily verily” Lighten Up chief. It’s just a joke. Just like outlander’s “puddle of goo”

  242. LLTVET
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 8:52 pm | Permalink

    Oh, and Regular. One more thing. On the McCain/Obama thread. The West Virginia Caucus took place on Feb 5 2008. Mike Huckabee won 52 % of the vote, (and the delegates) Romney won 47% and McCain won 1%. But you can look it up for yourself if you don’t believe me.

  243. Regular
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 8:53 pm | Permalink

    LLTVET
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 8:40 pm | Permalink
    Regular, why don’t you figure out what a fallacy is. Study them all, then tell me when your ready.
    —————————-
    You do assume a lot don’t you? Do you think everyone that doesn’t agree with you is some sort of knuckle-dragger?

    I’ve take several philosophy courses which include critical thinking and logic, participated in bulletin board discussions on a philosophy board and understand fallacy as it applies to engineering principles and literary values.

    Whenever you decide to step down from your artificial high-horse that you’ve saddled, let me know.

  244. Posted May 13, 2008 at 8:55 pm | Permalink

    Paradox of Our Time
    Author – Who Cares??

    The paradox of our time in history is that we have taller buildings but shorter tempers, wider Freeways, but narrower viewpoints. We spend more, but have less, we buy more, but enjoy less. We have bigger houses and smaller families, more conveniences, but less time. We have more degrees but less sense, more knowledge, but less judgment, more experts, yet more problems , more medicine, but less wellness.

    We drink too much, smoke too much, spend too recklessly, laugh too little, drive too fast, get too angry, stay up too late, get up too tired, read too little, watch TV too much, and pray too seldom.

    We have multiplied our possessions, but reduced our values. We talk too much, love too seldom, and hate too often.

    We’ve learned how to make a living, but not a life. We’ve added years to life not life to years. We’ve been all the way to the moon and back, but have trouble crossing the street to meet a new neighbor. We conquered outer space but not inner space. We’ve done larger things, but not better things.

    We’ve cleaned up the air, but polluted the soul. We’ve conquered the atom, but not our prejudice. We write more, but learn less. We plan more, but accomplish less. We’ve learned to rush, but not to wait. We build more computers to hold more information, to produce more copies than ever, but we communicate less and less.

    These are the times of fast foods and slow digestion, big men and small character, steep profits and shallow relationships. These are the days of two incomes but more divorce, fancier houses, but broken homes. These are days of quick trips, disposable diapers, throwaway morality, one night stands, overweight bodies, and pills that do everything from cheer, to quiet, to kill. It is a time when there is much in the showroom window and nothing in the stock room.

    Remember; spend some time with your loved ones, because they are not going to be around forever.

    Remember, say a kind word to someone who looks up to you in awe, because that little person soon will grow up and leave your side.

    Remember, to give a warm hug to the one next to you, because that is the only treasure you can give wit h your heart and it doesn’t cost a cent.

    Remember, to say, ‘I love you’ to your partner and your loved ones, but most of all mean it. A kiss and an embrace will mend hurt when it comes from deep inside of you.

    Remember to hold hands and cherish the moment for someday that person will not be there again.

    Give time to love, give time to speak! And give time to share the precious thoughts in your mind.

    AND ALWAYS REMEMBER:

    Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away.

  245. LLTVET
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:09 pm | Permalink

    Well Regular, when I present an argument against a known fallacy (the slippery slope) and you seem to just say that it isn’t a fallacy. Just because you think it is common sense. Well it makes you look like a knuckle-dragger chief.

    So do you want to discuss our slippery slope from above? Or do you just want to get mad and accuse me of being on the proverbial high horse?

  246. Apophis
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:11 pm | Permalink

    ………..troll-boy jimme mac, you’ll never convince anyone that you don’t drink with your incoherent ramblings.

    As for the implied insult about being a “middle school teacher”, at least I have a job. I don’t wait for my welfare check every month like you do.

  247. Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:13 pm | Permalink

    Just think Apophis, if he did drink, he would be even WORSE!! LOL

  248. Hud
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:20 pm | Permalink

    Someone posted this earlier today.

    “Please refrain from personal attacks and using other posters’ nicknames.”

  249. cosmos_originally
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:25 pm | Permalink

    jimmymac posted May 13, 2008 at 7:15 pm

    “Oh you mean when I post a cut and paste and cosmos calls me a liar for a year and a half.”

    The fictional last paragraph jimmymac added to his copy/paste post here is a lie.

    http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/05/open_thread_25-4/#comment-239232

    jimmymac, aka “Regular”, aka many other nics is a liar.

  250. LLTVET
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:25 pm | Permalink

    I waited 10 minutes for Regular. I do have a life. Have a good night folks.

  251. Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:27 pm | Permalink

    Nite VET

  252. Apophis
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:28 pm | Permalink

    …….I remeber that one cosmos

    That was a “little jimmiemac special”!

  253. Rage
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:35 pm | Permalink

    Thank you, folks.

    I won’t explain that. Sorry. Figure it out.

    I know you can. :)

  254. WSClark
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:01 pm | Permalink

    A day or so ago, Nathaniel wanted to have me banned from the blog because I called McCluer a cuckold husband.

    (McCluer has variously state that his wife left him with another man or that he has never been married and is still a virgin.)

    But tonight, Nathaniel goes on and on and on about how Chas is not a true Christian, despite the fact that Chas is an ordained minister.

    The conversation goes like this………

    “You’re not a REAL Christian.”

    “Yes I am!”

    “No you’re not – I said so!”

    “Yes, I am!”

    “I say you’re not and my word is law.”

    Now, who should be banned from WE Blog?

  255. TomPaine
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:07 pm | Permalink

    http://www.georgecarlin.com/home/home.html

    anybody who knows Carlins act should know he doesnt do sappy sentimental shit, In fact you could call him the anthesis of sappy

  256. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:23 pm | Permalink

    LLTVET,

    How is Romans 16: 16 an edict for “all” Christians to greet one another with a kiss?

    Like the typical amateur reading the Bible you take some obscure verse and try to use it in an argument completely out of context.

    Try again.

  257. StevenEDavis
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:27 pm | Permalink

    I left this discussion long ago to attend an event at my son’s high school where he was given honors for his grades, attitude, participation, and attendance.

    You guys who don’t have an R.L. are just sad. You should get one, if it is not too late for you.

    Night all…

  258. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:30 pm | Permalink

    LLTVET,

    I also noticed that your standard for being a Christian didn’t even involve Christ. Where do you people get this stuff from?

    I guess I am a black Muslim who believes that cows are sacred and I love to eat pork.

    Don’t argue with me though, because who are you to say I am not any of those things!

  259. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:31 pm | Permalink

    Steven,

    I just returned from my Bowling League. Where I meet with several friends I have made from school and work to have some fun.

    I have a real life too.

  260. StevenEDavis
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:33 pm | Permalink

    Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 4:34 pm | Permalink
    Steven,

    If Chas’s own words about Christ doesn’t prove that he is not Christian, then what would?

    That is exactly what a base my saying he is not Christian on.

    This has nothing to do with humility.
    **********

    So, you disgustingly arrogant jerk, this is an admission you have no humility.

    I am terribly surpised by that admission.

    /sarcasm

  261. StevenEDavis
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:36 pm | Permalink

    “I have a real life too.”

    Of course you do. When I was your age, I was not on a blog (admittedly they did not exist then), hasseling people. I was out looking for girls. Found a few. How are you doing, virgin boy?

  262. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:39 pm | Permalink

    Steven,

    Chas’s own words are what makes him not a Christian.

    How does that make me a disgustingly arrogant jerk?

    How does that make me have no humility?

    As you yourself said earlier: Do you even see the irony here in your saying those things about me?

  263. StevenEDavis
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:42 pm | Permalink

    I’ve seen Nathan, he is not a bad looking kid. You have to kind of wonder what is up with him hanging out here, when there may be females who could overlook his problems.

    Mark J. Penn in his book “Micro-trends” suggests that there is a problem for females finding suitable men. There are fewer males being born, fewer are going to college, whereas more women are going to college and making reasonable incomes.

    Hmmm… RE: Nathan is all I’m saying…

  264. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:42 pm | Permalink

    Steven,

    You must be off your medication again. You are back to Jekyll and Hyde mode again.

    What next? Are you going to make fun of my father not loving me?

  265. StevenEDavis
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:45 pm | Permalink

    “How does that make me have no humility?

    “As you yourself said earlier: Do you even see the irony here in your saying those things about me?”

    If you don’t know, there is no point in discussing it further. I do believe that you might be too limited to understand the point.

    Some other time we will discuss this. I am going to bed now.

    Night, night, chump…

  266. BlueJay
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:47 pm | Permalink

    Dissecting Nathan’s psyche…

    Tempting. Daunting even.

    But I have better things to do.

    I missed Senator Clinton’s victory speech. And I find it replayed nowhere. Why?

    Sheesh if Obama sneezes, it gets replayed 947 times.

  267. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:47 pm | Permalink

    Will you be nice reasonalbe Steven or 2nd grade name calling Steven the next time we meet?

  268. StevenEDavis
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:49 pm | Permalink

    “What next? Are you going to make fun of my father not loving me?”

    Funny you should bring that up. Sorry, sad sack, I won’t bite.

    I am not on medications. So thanks for making up crap like your hero, Regular does. I thought, apparently incorrectly, that you might not be such a loser, as James McLoser. Guess I was wrong.

  269. StevenEDavis
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:51 pm | Permalink

    No more troll food for Nathan. Night.

  270. WSClark
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:53 pm | Permalink

    “Where I meet with several friends I have made from school and work to have some fun”

    Would that include actual females and the actual possibility of an actual relationship that might lead to actual sex?

  271. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:54 pm | Permalink

    Steven,

    So is it some other problem then? What makes you turn into the name calling machine every so often?

  272. BlueJay
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:00 pm | Permalink

    I’ll opine that maybe it is because you are an insufferable creep Nathan.

    I can’t imagine anyone thinks someone like you can be worked with.

    And it seems the voters in West Virginia agree with me.

    The contest goes on. I’m still ticked I didn’t get to hear Senator Clinton’s speech. I hear it was great.

    Jay grabs a bugle and plays “El Deguello”.

  273. Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:07 pm | Permalink

    Should be on CNN Jay.. Anderson Cooper maybe..

  274. Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:08 pm | Permalink

    Good night; Good luck;
    God Bless – Whatever you conceive God to be!

    Blessings ALL!!

    Blessing on Clinton, and all of those in the primary race.

  275. BlueJay
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:21 pm | Permalink

    Dammit. I found it on you tube.

    Likely it is very busy and so slow to load.

    Cspan is also absent. THEY are rerunning Obama stuff. I’ll keep looking.

    Obama supporters?

    I don’t support your candidate. But I do respect you.

    Well, most of you.

    Obama NEEDS this fight. He needs to learn HOW to fight.

    “Hope” and “change” and “vote for me or else” aint gonna get it.

  276. BlueJay
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:28 pm | Permalink

    But in fairness Obama supporters?

    I have to note your wholesale absence this ENTIRE evening.

    Defending your candidate anyway.

    If your candidate is to be the nominee and win? That has to change.

    Hope and change is just words. You and Obama also need to learn about fight and grit. Ya can’t celebrate when you win and when you lose pretend it didn’t happen.

  277. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:32 pm | Permalink

    Chas
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 6:09 pm | Permalink
    Dear Members and Friends of The Clergy Letter Project,
    —————————————————-

    Don’t you just hate seeing the same stuff posted several times a day?

  278. StevenEDavis
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:33 pm | Permalink

    Sorry, I am done with this blog. I will no longer post here. It is just not worth it. Have said my piece to Phillip Brownlee, too. Night, night, A-holes’.

  279. BlueJay
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:33 pm | Permalink

    Still looking for Senator Clinton’s speech….

    Stuck listening to Obama. I’ll give him a hearing.

    WHY can’t I hear the speech I WANT to hear?

  280. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:35 pm | Permalink

    Standing guard
    By Wayne LaPierre, Executive Vice PresidentBarack Obama’s Slippery Oratory

    To understand Barack Obama on the Second Amendment, you have to know about the clash of character between the then-Chicago state senator and an ordinary citizen who exercised his right to armed self-defense in violation of a local gun ban.

    That citizen was a 52-year-old resident of Wilmette, Illinois who, on December 28, 2003 woke to find that during the night his home had been invaded by a career criminal; a thief who stole household items, keys and the homeowner’s car.

    The victim, Hale DeMar, described his fear in a letter to the Chicago Sun Times:

    “For me, the seconds until I found my children still safely tucked in their beds were horrifying … The police were called and in routine fashion they came, took the report and with little concern left, promising to increase surveillance. Little comfort, since the invader now had keys to our home and our automobiles. The police informed me that this was not an uncommon event in east Wilmette and offered their condolences …”

    Not 24 hours after the first burglary, the thief returned. Using DeMar’s house keys, the man entered the home, this time setting off the alarm system, automatically notifying the security company. Given the previous night’s lackluster response by police, DeMar was prepared, armed with a handgun—legally purchased years before and kept in a safe. But under Wilmette’s gun ban, that firearm in the home was illegal.

    DeMar confronted the criminal, and believing his children were in danger, shot the burglar who then fled the home.

    “Until you are shocked by a piercing alarm in the middle of the night and met in your kitchen by a masked invader as your children shudder in their beds, until you confront that very real nightmare, please don’t suggest that some village trustee knows better …”

    “If my actions have spared only one family from the distress and trauma that this habitual criminal has caused hundreds of others, then I have served my civic duty and taken one evil creature off of our streets, something that our impotent criminal justice system had failed to do, despite some thirty odd arrests, plea bargains and suspended sentences.”

    The burglar, who was arrested after driving DeMar’s stolen SUV to a hospital, had an extensive criminal record.

    Cook County prosecutors ultimately declared DeMar’s use of a firearm to be justified. But Wilmette village officials pressed nonetheless to prosecute him for illegal possession of his handgun—a charge punishable by a huge fine and jail time. A town official was quoted in Reason magazine saying, “We need to set the example that we’re trying to protect our citizens.” And he said, DeMar—by possessing a legally purchased handgun—“is endangering innocent civilians.”

    Obama’s alleged support of the Second Amendment is utterly cynical and false. The outcry of the Illinois public was heard all the way to the state capitol. As a result, the Illinois House and Senate passed legislation in May 2004 to protect citizens who use handguns in self-defense in their homes or businesses despite local handgun bans. The House accepted the DeMar self-defense bill by a vote of 86-25 and the Senate moved the legislation on a 38-20 vote.

    And here lies the seminal moment for State Senator Barack Obama. When Obama turned thumbs down on the bill, he voted against the most basic element of the Second Amendment—the right of defense of self and family—the reason that millions of Americans own firearms.

    When the governor vetoed the bill, Obama once again voted against a citizen’s right to self-defense. Despite his vote, the veto override passed the Senate and the House by overwhelming majorities, thereby enacting this bill into law.

    Now, fast forward to today’s slippery oratory of U.S. Sen. Barack Obama just three years from being an unknown state senator—now morphed by the media into a spellbinding U.S. Senator seeking to be President of the United States.

    Using words like “protecting sportsmen,” Obama is now saying that he believes in the Second Amendment … but with almost universal exceptions, all of which he lists under the heading of “common sense gun safety laws.”

    “Common sense gun safety” and the Second Amendment? Like endorsing the D.C. gun ban, which outlaws armed self-defense in the home—now being challenged before the U.S. Supreme Court. Obama, who as President would be in the position to nominate justices to that high court, has declared that the D.C. ban doesn’t violate the Second Amendment.

    “Common sense gun safety” and the Second Amendment? In a “1998 National Political Awareness Test,” he pledged to support a “Ban [on] the sale or transfer of all forms of semi-automatic weapons”—meaning most handguns and many rifles and shotguns that you and I own.

    “Common sense gun safety” and the Second Amendment? Like demanding that the federal government preempt the 40 hard-won state laws creating Right-to-Carry. Here’s how the Chicago Tribune put it: “Obama said he opposed allowing ordinary citizens to carry concealed weapons and that a federal law banning concealed carried weapons except for law enforcement is needed.”

    “Common sense gun safety” and the Second Amendment? Like the draconian proposals funded to the tune of $18,000,000 by the rabidly anti-gun Joyce Foundation while Obama was an activist member of its board of directors.

    Obama’s alleged support of the Second Amendment is utterly cynical and false. Barack Obama is not for the right to keep and bear arms; he’s out to destroy it.

    http://www.nrapublications.org/SG/index.asp

  281. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:41 pm | Permalink

    Steven,

    Had to leave calling us names… wow. How immature.

  282. WSClark
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:41 pm | Permalink

    “Ya can’t celebrate when you win and when you lose pretend it didn’t happen.”

    Like when Hillary only won Indiana by 1.2% after expecting to win by double digits, while losing to Obama by a mile in North Carolina.

    According to Hillary supporters, she “split” the primaries………………

    Yeah, right.

    Oh, by the way, didn’t the Hillary supporters say that primary victories didn’t really count unless it was a (blue) state where Democrats usually win?

    Yeah, I remember hearing that.

    Do ya’ think that ANY Democrat will take West Virginia in November?

  283. BlueJay
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:46 pm | Permalink

    Hug Nathan WS.

  284. StevenEDavis
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:47 pm | Permalink

    Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:41 pm | Permalink
    Steven,

    Had to leave calling us names… wow. How immature.
    **********

    I am leaving calling you and your father lovely human beings. These folks, the Prices, want to kill others – muslims, etc. They are SOOOO… good. I am leaving calling what you are – no, I won’t. Sorry. That is all.

  285. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:48 pm | Permalink

    Sure Dems will take WV and all 49 other states.

    You see, the Dems are signing up new members every day, and the Dem turnout in the primaries is about double what the Repub turnout is in the primaries.

    Some say that since the Repub candidate was decided 3 months ago, that Repubs haven’t bothered to turn out. Some say that Operation Chaos has given the Repubs something to vote for/against in the primaries, instead of voting for McCain who has already won.

    But don’t believe some people, just keep foolin yourselves about how great the Dem turnout will be in November.

    In fact, the turnout will be so great, you Dems don’t even need to bother to vote.

  286. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:49 pm | Permalink

    Max,

    Nice article. I always love how the liberals say they support the 2nd Amendment for the “sportsman” and “hunting” LOL

    I don’t even think they know how dumb they sound to us real 2nd Amendment supporters.

  287. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:51 pm | Permalink

    Oh Boy! Hillary won WV by better then a 2:1 margin and she gained a whopping 12 more delegates then Obama!

    It’s getting close folks. Need to find a way to count MI and FL and buy the Superdelegates!

    Candidate_________Delegates
    Hillary Clinton————1,713
    Barack Obama——1,882

  288. BlueJay
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:53 pm | Permalink

    Aww don’t do that Steven.

    I don’t even want to pay attention to the Price’s. They aint worth it.

    But if it’s them drives YOU off?

    Well….I kinda gotta devote myself to the same as to them.

  289. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:54 pm | Permalink

    Nathan,

    I’m not a big fan of LaPierre, as his language is usually to inflamatory and turns many people off. His heart is in the right place though.

    But this article, was a classic. Best single article I’ve ever seen with LaPierre’s name on it.

  290. cosmos_originally
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:55 pm | Permalink

    Yes Apophis, that was one of jimmymac’s “specials”!

    After I posted,

    ‘BLAMING ENVIRONMENTALISTS FOR KATRINA: WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW!’
    http://www.sierraclub.org/pressroom/releases/pr2005-09-13a.asp

    jimmymac posted,

    blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2007/05/dont_count_on_f/#comment-239958
    “Look in the Congressional Record cosmos, not the Sierra Club. And look at Justice Department reports.

    You will find that the Army Corp of Engineers had to delay projects and subsequently lost the funding for those projects for those Fiscal years.

    The truth hurts when told, the Sierra Club screwed the Levees in New Orleans.”
    ——

    Later, jimmymac basically copy/pasted some snips similar to my
    ‘BLAMING ENVIRONMENTALISTS FOR KATRINA: WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW!’ link.

    And… added a bogus, fictional ending paragraph.

    jimmymac had nothing from the “Congressional Record”.

    jimmymac had no “Justice Department reports”.

    The people who filed a lawsuit against the Corps disagree with little jimmymac — there’s no mention of the Sierra Club.

    ‘Judge tosses Katrina lawsuit against Engineer Corps’
    http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN30257740

    The judge seemed to agree with the plaintiffs, but the Corps is protected by a 1928 law.

  291. Nathaniel
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:55 pm | Permalink

    Steven,

    Now you claim we want to kill people???

    Leave with some dignity man if you are going to leave.

  292. BlueJay
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:55 pm | Permalink

    And “Max” is STILL “Regular”

  293. BlueJay
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:59 pm | Permalink

    Nathan DID threaten posters here.

    He threatened to bring a gun to a meetup.

  294. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:59 pm | Permalink

    Thanks JR.

    Glad to see you are so concerned about my bowel habits.

    Course, you are used to having your head up there.

  295. WSClark
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:01 am | Permalink

    “Hug Nathan WS.”

    Naw, he’s still a virgin and might get the wrong idea.

  296. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:05 am | Permalink

    For Obama to oppose a law that allows a person to defend themselves in their own homes with a firearm – that tells you he does NOT support the 2nd Amendment.

    Since Obama doesn’t think you have the right to defend your own life in your own home, I wonder what if any other individual rights Obama would deny.

  297. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:11 am | Permalink

    The resounding sound of silence, then mass cries and sobs of disbelief fill the blog in the void of the departure of Steven Davis.

    How will we all go on without him?

    The agony, I can barely bare it!

    Maybe if we begged him to come back, wrote the editors, and sign a petition, or use some of Nathan’s legal defense fund (which he will no longer need) to bribe Steven, he will come back?

  298. WSClark
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:14 am | Permalink

    “For Obama to oppose a law that allows a person to defend themselves in their own homes with a firearm”

    Do you mean like George WMD Bush and his support for the D C ban on weapons?

    Like that?

    George W Bush wants to deny you your Second Amendment rights, SO Max – what are you going to do about it?

  299. BlueJay
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:16 am | Permalink

    Steven met you James. He was nice to you.

    Let’s me and you meet. I won’t be so nice.

  300. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:16 am | Permalink

    This can’t possibly happen to YOU!

    http://www.gazette.net/stories/051408/bethnew194143_32356.shtml

    Home invasions prompt tighter security for seniors

    In response to another home invasion in Montgomery County, police are again warning seniors to be aware of suspicious people in their neighborhoods and to take measures to protect their homes.

    A Bethesda couple was tied up and robbed on May 7 during a home invasion that police say could be connected to a series of break-ins in the county that have taken place since last fall.

    The invasion occurred at about 2:30 a.m. in the 5800 block of Brookside Drive, police said. The husband and wife, both in their 70s, were awakened by a man with a handgun. The couple was then restrained while the man robbed the home. At some point, the suspect struck the female victim, but she did not require hospitalization. The husband was not injured.

    Officers are currently looking for a single suspect who they believe is connected to at least four other home invasion robberies.

  301. Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:20 am | Permalink

    Hank wrote: “But the same people who don’t want us to burn coal . . . ”

    Hank, tell it to your boy McCain.

  302. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:21 am | Permalink

    Nice attempt at a diversion from Obama’s gun ban agenda Clark.

    Fortunately, Bush can’t run again.

    Care to defend Obama?

  303. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:25 am | Permalink

    The Baseball Bat Defense!

    http://www.fox12news.com/Global/story.asp?S=8320112

    Two suspects wanted in Aumsville home robbery

    Last Update: 5/13 5:54 pm

    BOISE, Idaho — Two accused burglars are behind bars after authorities say they got into a fight during a home invasion.

    Michael Torrey, 25, is charged with felony burglary and aggravated battery. Darren Schwartz, 18, is facing felony burglary and robbery charges.

    Police say the two were caught inside a house on Maze Street Monday night. They were discovered by two men who live in the home.

    A fight broke out between the victims and suspects, and a baseball bat was used during the altercation, according to investigators.

    Police believe the men did know each other, and say the incident does not appear to be random.

  304. Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:28 am | Permalink

    Max–

    You are truly an @$$hole. StevenDavis is the only sane poster here, and I include myself in that assessment.

    The Eagle did a very good thing when it required registration. It has practically eliminated the hit-and-run trolls that used to plague the Blog from 9 pm to 1 am.

    Now it needs to take the next step of monitoring and pulling posts, and tombstoning people like Max who come on just to harass others.

    Otherwise, the best and most thoughtful posters like Steven just get run off and the place becomes a wasteland . . .

  305. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:30 am | Permalink

    http://www.localnews8.com/Global/story.asp?S=8319572&nav=menu554_2_2

    Gang Takeover

    Posted: May 13, 2008 08:00 PM CDT

    Crime is taking over Fort Hall Township. Homes have been burnt down, ransacked and shot out. The streets are covered in graffiti. Most people say it’s a matter of time before someone gets killed. Fort Hall Police are blaming the violence on gangs, and there’s evidence of that everywhere.

    Last week, Captain Lance Osborne with the Fort Hall Police Department took Local News 8’s Sally Showman on a drive to show her the damage gangs have done to the community.

    Home base for most of the gang activity in Fort hall is the Township. It has an eight block radius and it’s a hotbed, boiling with gang tensions. “Several stabbings have happened here and stuff like that. We’ve had some of driveby shootings but so far no one’s been hurt,” says Captain Osborne. He says it’s likely just a matter of time before someone is seriously hurt or killed. “The more violent acts are coming. They are getting really involved gang members.”

    Gangs have set fire to at least four homes in the Township and you can’t look down a street without seeing graffiti marking gang territory.

    During the ride along, Captain Osborne drove past several homes with bullet holes in them.

    For security reasons, a townsite home owner didn’t want her face on camera but she spoke about the gang violence she’s fallen victim to over the past few years. “In the last few years I have been more terrorized than anyone else in Fort Hall,” she says. “I’ve had to deal with a burnt home, gun shot, broken windows, broken car windows, kids being hit, it’s a situation that’s gotten out of hand,” continues the Fort Hall resident.

    It’s hard to keep up on repairs. She still has shattered windows from the most recent home invasion that happened a month ago. More than five bullet holes riddle the outside of her house and inside you can see where a bullet went through her tv and out the bottom.

  306. WSClark
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:30 am | Permalink

    “Nice attempt at a diversion”

    How’s that, Scroll Over, is it okay for Republicans but not okay for Democrats?

  307. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:31 am | Permalink

    Police Searching For Suspect In Daylight Home Invasion

    Updated: May 13, 2008 06:49 PM CDT

    CORPUS CHRISTI-Police are out in full force looking for the man they say is responsible for a bizarre home invasion in the 3600-block of Braniff, near the Corpus Christi state school. Apparently, a masked man broke into the side door of the home.

    A woman and her three young kids were inside at the time. KRIS 6 News learned the robber pushed the toddler into some furniture giving the child a big bump and a bloody nose, but thankfully no major injuries.

    The suspect then rummaged through the home and took jewelry and compact discs before running off. What is odd is that it happened in broad daylight. Investigators are at the scene currently and hoping the suspect left behind fingerprints as he rummaged through the home.

    http://www.kristv.com/Global/story.asp?S=8319247&nav=Bsmh

  308. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:35 am | Permalink

    Autopsy results show kidnapping victim died from stab wounds to neck, upper torso

    Posted: May 6, 2008 04:15 PM CDT

    RICH SQUARE, NC (WAVY.com) — Ricky Harris, a North Carolina man who became the victim of a violent, deadly home invasion was released from Norfolk General Monday.

    As for the other victim Nekia Hunter, autopsy results became available Friday afternoon.

    The autopsy results revealed Nekia Hunter, 27, of Rich Square died of stab wounds to her upper torso and neck. There was also evidence of head trauma

    http://www.wavy.com/Global/story.asp?S=8279784&nav=23iiJ6TU

  309. Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:36 am | Permalink

    I’m also trying to figure out how a gun in my closet protects me when somebody wakes me up in the middle of the night with a pistol in my face . . .

    I guess I should sleep with a loaded handgun under my pillow like Max does.

  310. BlueJay
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:38 am | Permalink

    “Max” is James McCluer.

    I dare anyone to prove me wrong.

  311. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:39 am | Permalink

    38 Rapes in Memphis Reported in 30 Days

    Last Update: 5/13 6:43 pm

    MEMPHIS, TN – Eyewitness News Everywhere uncovers 38 rapes were reported in Memphis in the last 30 days. Experts say Memphis has a history of being the city with the highest number of rapes per capita and the reports have come in from all across the city.

    Experts say in a lifetime, one in 12 women will be forcibly raped and many of the victims will be 18 or younger. However, experts say only one in 10 sexual assaults are reported.

    One victim told police she was raped Saturday, May 10, 2008 at 4:30 in the afternoon, near the intersection of Macon and Graham. Suzanne Melton, who lives in the area, says knowing that is a scary thought.

    “It makes me angry that you can’t feel safe, leaving your home and you can’t go to a grocery store, the mall. wherever… and feel safe. You’re always looking over your shoulder to make sure no one’s following you.”

    Experts say, to stay safe, people should look for certain signs.

    “Excessive jealousy, someone who’s checking on your whereabouts, who you’ve been with, where you’ve gone… all of those are signs of someone who’s abusive and who could be sexually abusive as well,” said Anna Whalley of the Shelby County Crime Victims’ Center. Whalley says people should also be aware of their surroundings at all times, especially when going out at night.

    Memphis resident Lisa Murphy says she was raped eleven years ago during a home invasion.

    http://www.myeyewitnessnews.com/news/local/story.aspx?content_id=f0fd7e23-191f-4b03-b29f-09e5d93a62ae

  312. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:40 am | Permalink

    Two arrested for home invasion robbery
    The Times-Standard
    Article Launched: 05/13/2008 02:36:27 PM PDT

    EUREKA — Humboldt County Sheriff’s Detectives arrested two men today in connection with a home-invasion style robbery that occurred on Little Fairfield on April 30.

    At about 7:10 a.m. Monday, the Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office, with cooperation from other agencies, served a search warrant at an apartment on the 100 block of W. Del Norte Street in Eureka.

    The Sheriff’s Office’s Special Enforcement Team made entry into the apartment. Melvin Matthews, 25 of Eureka, was taken into custody and booked for a parole violation.

    Further investigation led to the arrest Ray “Rafey” M. James, 35 of Willow Creek. James was already in custody, having been arrested by the Eureka Police Department on Saturday for auto theft.

    The two men were booked on suspicion of robbery, assault with a deadly weapon, false imprisonment, kidnapping, making threats with the intent to terrorize, burglary, and conspiracy. Neither man is eligible to post bail as they are both on parole and have also been booked for violation of parole.

    On April 30., three armed men broke into a residence on the 4300 block of Little Fairfield. It was reported that three suspects struck the occupants of the home multiple times. The suspects took electronic equipment, a shotgun, and marijuana from the residence. The investigation into a possible third suspect is continuing.

    http://www.times-standard.com/ci_9246483

  313. Predestined
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:43 am | Permalink

    The suspects took electronic equipment, a shotgun, and marijuana from the residence.

    Looks like that shotgun didn’t do those people in the home being invaded much good.

  314. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:44 am | Permalink

    Home Invasion Suspect Arrested In LA

    POSTED: 12:36 pm CDT May 9, 2008
    UPDATED: 1:29 pm CDT May 9, 2008

    KANSAS CITY, Mo. — A man wanted in connection with a Kansas City home invasion was arrested in Los Angeles on Thursday.

    Police arrested Tyrone Brown in connection with the January robbery.

    Officers said Brown, along with several others, broke into a home in the 7400 block of East 52nd Street. They said the group attacked the homeowner and stole several items, including the victim’s SUV.

    Police arrested another suspect, Shawn Burkhalter, 19, in the home invasion in April. According to court documents, Burkhalter forced his way in and held a gun to the victim’s head while five others entered and robbed the house.

    http://www.kctv5.com/news/16214599/detail.html

  315. Predestined
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:44 am | Permalink

    The suspects took electronic equipment, a shotgun, and marijuana from the residence.

    Hey, Mr. Policeman! They stole my weed!

  316. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:45 am | Permalink

    Just Release the Murderers Back to the Streets:

    http://www.columbiatribune.com/2008/May/20080507News010.asp

    Crime report unveils murder suspect
    Home invasion victim jailed in Florida case.

    By JOE MEYER of the Tribune’s staff
    Published Wednesday, May 7, 2008
    A home invasion and robbery last month and three-week investigation into a false name given by the alleged victim led to the arrest yesterday of a Boone County man on a warrant for murder in Miami, the Boone County Sheriff’s Department said.

    Madison
    Quentin T. Madison, 31, of 7183 N. Wagon Trail Road, Lot 16, was arrested at about 6 p.m. yesterday on the Florida warrant for first-degree murder. He was being held today at the Boone County Jail without bond as Florida investigators were traveling here to interview Madison.

    The investigation began April 16 when sheriff’s deputies went to a mobile home at Wagon Wheel Trailer Park after a neighbor reported a home-invasion robbery had occurred nearby, sheriff’s Maj. Tom Reddin said.

    Madison identified himself as the victim but told investigators his name was Jones and gave another person’s date of birth and Social Security number.

    As the investigation unfolded, Reddin said, investigators became suspicious and focused on the possibility that the robbery was a drug rip-off.

    Investigators checked the name Madison provided in a computer database, and it indicated ‘Jones’ was an alias for Quentin Madison.

    “So Madison at some point in time had access to Jones’ information … and used it at his discretion to avoid revealing his own identity,” Reddin said.

    Investigators also learned of a murder warrant from Florida for a 2001 homicide in Miami, Reddin said.

    They also learned that “Jones,” or Madison, had been arrested in April in Kansas City. Sheriff’s deputies compared a photo of Madison with the picture from the Kansas City arrest and a photo of the real Jones, whom Reddin declined to further identify. The comparison showed Madison was the man wanted for murder in Florida.

  317. cosmos_originally
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:46 am | Permalink

    Capn,

    Hank Price’s “coal” post was a copy/paste written by his hero, Dennis Avery.

    Avery lies about climate scientists.

    ‘Outrage in the Climate Science Community Continues Over the “500 Scientist” List’
    http://www.desmogblog.com/outrage-in-the-climate-science-community-continues-over-the-500-scientist-list
    “Earlier today we broke the story about dozens of scientists outraged at the use of their good names in an article by Heartland Institute’s “Senior Fellow” Dennis Avery (pictured above) posted on their website entitled 500 Scientists with Documented Doubts of Man-Made Global Warming Scares.”

    See link for quotes from some of the scientists.

  318. Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:48 am | Permalink

    Thanks, Cosmos.

    And not a single CON has explained why John McCain isn’t a crackpot fearmonger peddling the myth of global warming for his own gain when he warns of the same thing Al Gore does.

    Yup, nothing to see there.

  319. WSClark
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:50 am | Permalink

    “I guess I should sleep with a loaded handgun under my pillow like Max does.”

    Actually Max recommends having a body part replaced with a firearm, as he has done.

    Max had his cheney removed and replaced with a small caliber derringer. He has had some problems with it however, since it seems to misfire or fire prematurely, fails to chamber a bullet when needed and jams frequently and often misses the target, but he is ready if someone breaks into his house.

  320. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:52 am | Permalink

    Overland Park, Kansas

    From the Kansas City Star of April 30, 2008
    Burglar greeted by gunfire

    Overland Park police are investigating a business burglary where an employee fired shots at a suspect. But the suspect, who may have been hit, was able to get away.

    The incident occurred at 10:50 p.m. Tuesday at Ratliff Guttering Company in the 5000 block of Mackey Street.

    Police said a company employee had been sleeping in an apartment inside the business when he heard a loud crash coming from the garage area. The employee grabbed a 12-gauge shotgun and went to the garage area to investigate.

    The employee saw the garage door partially open and then saw a man inside near one of the company’s trucks. He then fired a shot and heard the man yell. The intruder then ran towards the garage door and the employee fired again.

    Police found blood on the garage floor but could not find the intruder anywhere. They alerted hospitals and other area law enforcement agencies.

  321. Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:55 am | Permalink

    J R–

    Max is an arrogant, irritating idiot and so is Reguliar, but they’re not the same arrogant, irritating idiot.

    Google “Max Grobnik.” You’ll get some guy in Iowa. He posts on WEBlog up there too. At this link, he gives his address as “Des Moines, Iowa” http://www.topix.com/forum/state/ia/TO1RB4M8UTECPNV2G

    As we well know, Reguliar lies in his sister’s basement on a busy street north of Central in East Wichita.

    However, if you like to needle Max by claiming that he is Regular, go ahead. He deserves it.

  322. Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:56 am | Permalink

    Also, Max seems to only care about guns and taxes. Reguliar doesn’t care about guns at all.

  323. Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:59 am | Permalink

    LOL, Clark!

    You are a sick bastid. I love it.

  324. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 1:04 am | Permalink

    Wow Capn, you found my pre-Iowa caucus posts. BFD.

    If you look around, you’ll find enough of my posts across the country, on national, state, and local blogs.

    Try DC, FL, or PA for example. Oh, and not all use the name of Max Grobnik.

    You ain’t got a clue, but keep trying.

    Oh, and btw, if you know how, you can change your IP to anywhere you want.

    Just an fyi.

  325. Posted May 14, 2008 at 1:08 am | Permalink

    Max would appear to want some to believe he is from Des Moines >>>>

    Max Grobnik
    Des Moines, IA (taken fro Topix.com)

  326. Posted May 14, 2008 at 1:09 am | Permalink

    Wow. That sounds exactly like the kind of psuedo-computer lingo that Regular throws around.

    Hey, maybe you’re right, J R!

  327. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 1:11 am | Permalink

    Square Peg is the pastor of which church?

    Hmmmmm……….

  328. Posted May 14, 2008 at 1:13 am | Permalink

    Next time some hulking dude threatens to kill me for flirting with his girlfriend . . .

    “What’s your name, a$$hole?”

    “Max Grobnik, a$$hole.”

  329. Posted May 14, 2008 at 1:16 am | Permalink

    CapNAmerica — I have noticed several posters that have suggested that there are a few troublemakers who might have been able to hack the WEBlog for purposes of getting past registration, or for stealing email addresses.

    Maybe Max is one of those culprits. Hey, its his language – not mine!!

    Gee, it’s after 1 a.m. there in Kansas. Guess I should go do something else, and let you good folks go to bed. Hawaii is so nice this time of year. :-D

  330. Posted May 14, 2008 at 1:30 am | Permalink

    Most interesting how Max seems to run out of gas about the same time every night. Or maybe they wont let h im have his laptop after certain hours.

  331. Posted May 14, 2008 at 1:33 am | Permalink

    Or maybe Max doesnt find Regular’s sister intresting until after 1 a.m. LOL

  332. MaxGrobnik
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 1:34 am | Permalink

    ping

  333. Posted May 14, 2008 at 1:35 am | Permalink

    pong

  334. Posted May 14, 2008 at 1:36 am | Permalink

    I don’t think anybody with the requisite skills to hack the WEBlog would bother hacking it.

    Quite a few posters on our side of the aisle are pretty proficient coders etc. and none of them think that ISP’s or e-mail addresses are hackable.

    Of course, anything’s theoretically possible, but I’m referring to the practical.

    Enjoy your stay in Hawaii. I’m going to the Bahamas in July. Counting down the days . . .

  335. Posted May 14, 2008 at 1:39 am | Permalink

    Thanks CapN – Just here on some business for a few days. Should be home for the weekend! But it is very nice here right now. Golf here is incredible!

  336. Regular
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 6:54 am | Permalink

    How sweet!

    Duh Libs are so obsessed with me even when I’m not online that they talk about me.

    I see that Steven Davis has left the blog once again, this will make about the third time I believe.

    He appears to be a pleasant person in real life, but evidently has an ear for gossip (true or untrue) and believes it either way 100 percent.

    I see that Squarepeg,Chas,Das,Sugar has created another story about golfing in Hawaii and better yet he pretends he posted from Hawaii on this blog. Anyone who is stupid enough to believe that…

  337. Posted May 17, 2008 at 7:55 pm | Permalink

    I needed some cold hard cash. The electricity was shut off. I couldn’t pay the bill. I asked a bro if I could borrow a couple bucks. “Money is tight right now” I was told. So, I went looking into a payday loan. I had to use the internet as there are no stores near my house. After filling out 3 applications
    I settled on Funding Now. Quickly I arranged all of the paperwork and sent the fax to them. The next day I checked my bank account and they tried withdrawing the full amount of the advance rather than depositing it! Afterward I gave them a buzz to find out whom I needed to murder No one was helpful. Well, anyway I call the attorney general. I was on my own with less money then when I started with. So out of curiosity I called another payday advance company. The company was quick advance. Not only did they offer me a payday loan at a cheaper rate, but they fixed the problem with the previous payday loan! Quick Advance rocks! If you’re ever looking for a payday loan shop around!

  338. Posted May 18, 2008 at 5:47 am | Permalink

    Hallo,

    Sehr wichtig und nicht unnuetz http://fliegen.is-a-geek.net

  339. Posted May 24, 2008 at 5:02 am | Permalink

    Hallo,

    Sehr wichtig und nicht unnuetz testbericht.dyn-o-saur.com

25 Trackbacks

  1. [...] obamagear wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptTake your pick, but considering Osama Obama’s not present voting record in the Illinois State Senate, Obama was most likely present and wanted to preserve his political reputation by not committing to anything. Just like Osama Obama’s … [...]

  2. [...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptI’ll just wait right here for monkey to give us those famous obama solutions.” Which solutions, “ksfarmgrrl?” There are plenty of position papers on the Obama web site. Maybe he didn’t get down to your specific personal issues, … [...]

  3. [...] obamagear wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptTake your pick, but considering Osama Obama’s not present voting record in the Illinois State Senate, Obama was most likely present and wanted to preserve his political reputation by not committing to anything. Just like Osama Obama’s … Read the rest of this great post here [...]

  4. By Faxless Payday Loan on May 20, 2008 at 9:01 pm

    Faxless Payday Loan…

  5. By flat box handle on May 28, 2008 at 11:20 pm

    flat box handle…

  6. By Pee Female Pee Pee Hole on May 28, 2008 at 11:52 pm

    Pee Female Pee Pee Hole…

    I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view…

  7. By Small Monkey Pets on May 29, 2008 at 12:30 am

    Small Monkey Pets…

    had an answer they could provide for me….

  8. By Joe on May 29, 2008 at 1:17 am

    Joe…

    I could not believe the amount of quality material on this Free Mp3 Download. The site is extremely eyecatching and pulls the reader straight it, the articles are great quality and are very professionally written. I have seen too many of these sites w…

  9. Accounting Financial Calculators Bad Credit Credit Cards…

    I didn’t agree with you first, but last paragraph makes sense for me…

  10. By London Universities on May 29, 2008 at 6:56 am

    London Universities…

    This enables authors to keep track of who is linking to, or referring…

  11. By pa criminal background check on May 30, 2008 at 3:15 am

    pa criminal background check…

    I’m with the earlier poster, this seems like a good idea….

  12. Reporting My Attorney For Falsifying My Bankruptcy Petition…

    Found your blog on yahoo – thanks for the article but i still don’t get it….

  13. By Office Equipment Financing on June 1, 2008 at 11:15 am

    Office Equipment Financing…

    Wow, this is interesting. How could i missed this info before? It seems like i was lagging for years to have this kind of facts. Hehe. Thanks for the sharing, but i feel that i can’t really understand some of the issues here. I really need to check so…

  14. By Panic Attack Introduction on June 1, 2008 at 11:25 am

    Panic Attack Introduction…

    Can it be that your server is infected with a virus – I get an Virus warning when I open your site with Firefox – Just for your Info….

  15. By Ass Thick Ass Babes Kick Ass on June 3, 2008 at 5:54 am

    Ass Thick Ass Babes Kick Ass…

    I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view…

  16. By Space Star Wars Episode 3 Planet Mars on June 3, 2008 at 11:54 pm

    Space Star Wars Episode 3 Planet Mars…

    I didn’t agree with you first, but last paragraph makes sense for me…

  17. By \"2004-04-18\" on June 4, 2008 at 2:37 am

    \”2004-04-18\”…

    soma…

  18. Day Trading Market Liams Software Trading As Liamssoft…

    I didn’t agree with you first, but last paragraph makes sense for me…

  19. By Weather Forecast Air Supply Cloud on June 4, 2008 at 8:06 pm

    Weather Forecast Air Supply Cloud…

    I didn’t agree with you first, but last paragraph makes sense for me…

  20. By xanax on June 6, 2008 at 1:41 am

    xanax…

  21. By Party Planning Schools on June 6, 2008 at 2:52 am

    Party Planning Schools…

    (Blogger now has backlinks – very similar to the trackback feature in Movable Type.It has since been implemented in most other blogging…

  22. By Cash Lender Money Quick on June 6, 2008 at 3:15 pm

    Cash Lender Money Quick…

    Hi – just wanted to say good design and blog -…

  23. By family incest on June 8, 2008 at 4:26 pm

    family incest…

    Top family incest information may take a small bit of effort to pin down….

  24. By forced sex on June 9, 2008 at 2:51 am

    forced sex…

    Sometimes, you’ll get stunned by the massive supply of incest porn intelligence at hand….

  25. By Rape Video on June 9, 2008 at 8:32 am

    Rape Video…

    You may also stumble on what you are searching for in the university library….