Hello, I have a few websites of my own and I must say that your site is really top notch. Keep up the great work on a really high class resource Free Mp3 Download….

“Sure Clinton could quit as all the pundits want her to, but the awkward thing is she keeps winning primaries. What is she going to do, stand up and say, “Thank you West Virginia (Ohio, Texas, Indiana, Kentucky, Puerto Rico) for this big victory tonight and since the pundits demand it, I am now dropping out of the race”? ”

RobertL,

Clinton got 94 delegates in Texas.

Obama got 5 more delegates, 99.

If that’s your definition of a “big victory”, you might want to post it on the “Clinton’s fuzzy math…” thread.

Your 11:01 am post seems to suggest that we should throw away all Democratic primary voters, except those Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.

The nomination is based on the number of delegates.

Obama is only 56 delegates short of securing the nomination.

No kidding, as selfish as it may sound at time I wish I could go back to 2003 and just once again be fat, ignorant and blissfully unaware of the world.

Did you see where YOU were accused of reading only what is already your opinion (on another thread) or words that had that meaning? That person knows NOTHING aobut you and that post proved it! If only a few more were as well informed. Course as you and I know being informed is depressing (waaaaay depressing!).

Randy has decided who the Democratic candidate for President is. And all on his own!

I bet he tied his own shoes today too.

Sorry Randy. Senator Hillary Clinton is still in the race. And electorally, she is the best candidate for the Democratic party.

There are key states. Randy hasn’t named any of them. That’s because he would rather talk about Obama’s MAYBE strengths than his definite weaknesses.

Florida: (there is a movie tonight about how Florida decided the 2000 election. The cons used their power there to steal it. “Recount” tonight on HBO)

A recent poll shows Senator Clinton beating McCain in Florida by a comfortable margin.She also beat Obama in Florida’s not counted (yet) primary. Obama loses to McCain.

Ohio: (The cons played games there in 2004. The election was decided there.)

Senator Clinton ALSO beats McCain in Ohio by a comfortable margin. She also drubbed Obama there in the primary. Obama loses to McCain in this poll.

Pennsylvania: Here, the polls have Obama ahead of McCain. But not by a comfortable, fraud safe, margin. Senator Clinton beats McCain by a fraud free margin in Pennsylvania.

It’s fun to play “what if” with states we don’t normally think about. But this election is IMPORTANT. The Democrats need their BEST candidate to win the election. Senator Clinton continues to show that she should be that candidate.

Yeah, ’cause Repukes have done such a great job running the country–into the ground, that is.

Strange article. While Virginia and North Carolina clearly ARE in play for Democrats, it is frankly preposterous to imagine that Michigan will go for McCain. And then it says that Minnesota MAYBE is in play, but then, no, really, it probably isn’t.

This will be an election that redraws the map. How and to what extent will depend on a lot on who the candidates select as their VP’s.

bushco has been the best ambassador the Democratic Party could have.

I don’t think the other states Randy mentions – Virginia, North Carolina, Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada – are going to switch sides in a close election. If any of those switch, the election is one-sided anyway. A better shot for Obama is Ohio, though he did not look very strong there against Hillary.

Watch Iowa, New Mexico, Colorado and New Hampshire to get A LOT of attention this campaign.

The challenge for Obama is that the electoral college math is stacked slightly against him. A very narrow popular vote win will likely not get him the presidency. The reason for that is that Democrats “waste” millions of extra popular votes in building margins in states like New York, California and Illinois, that aren’t close at all, while Republicans tend to win more total states, though by narrower margins. In a winner-take-all allocation of electoral votes, this favors the Republican in a close election.