<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two chambers of two minds on tourism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/two-chambers-of-two-minds-on-tourism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/two-chambers-of-two-minds-on-tourism/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nano</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/two-chambers-of-two-minds-on-tourism/#comment-323420</link>
		<dc:creator>Nano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/two-chambers-of-two-minds-on-tourism/#comment-323420</guid>
		<description>Now that they took the giant rat down that used to stand beside I-70 out in Western Kansas, there's no reason to even slow down. (sarcasm)
Kansas has some beautiful country along I-70 and US 400 out east. We need to develop it and promote it.
 Promoting Kansas shouldn't start with the Phelps name or mention of the state BOE. It would be great if we could project a positive image. I hear Kansans say they don't care what everybody else thinks of us. That runs counter to self-promotion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that they took the giant rat down that used to stand beside I-70 out in Western Kansas, there&#8217;s no reason to even slow down. (sarcasm)<br />
Kansas has some beautiful country along I-70 and US 400 out east. We need to develop it and promote it.<br />
 Promoting Kansas shouldn&#8217;t start with the Phelps name or mention of the state BOE. It would be great if we could project a positive image. I hear Kansans say they don&#8217;t care what everybody else thinks of us. That runs counter to self-promotion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksagnostic</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/two-chambers-of-two-minds-on-tourism/#comment-323402</link>
		<dc:creator>ksagnostic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/two-chambers-of-two-minds-on-tourism/#comment-323402</guid>
		<description>Many states have tried to shift their tax burden to visitors, with some success. The source of that success was tourism. Now, Kansas is never, ever going to have the kind of tourism that even states like Missouri and Colorado (or for that matter Oklahoma) have. But, Kansas does have natural resources and some real spots of beauty (and natural beauty is the hook that gets visitors to visit, or more likely in the the case of Kansas, linger in, a state). But, everyone from the Kansas State Farm Bureau to the legislature to the Governor's office to the (truly extreme) state chamber of commerce don't have a clue. Ksfarmgrrl has touched on how the water resources, including lakes, have been mismanaged. This is definitely true of state parks. However, it hasn't necessarily been the management (we've had some very good people in natural resources and Wildlife and Parks, but they can only do so much when their departments are neglected) but the state government has rarely made conserving or utilizing natural resources a priority. In fact, they don't even seem to know how. So, you get absolutely clueless crap like "Kansas, as Big as you Think" (there was actually a good slogan that was rejected in favor of this pathetic piece of pablum), state parks that have little to now funding for maintenance, much less upgrading, etc..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many states have tried to shift their tax burden to visitors, with some success. The source of that success was tourism. Now, Kansas is never, ever going to have the kind of tourism that even states like Missouri and Colorado (or for that matter Oklahoma) have. But, Kansas does have natural resources and some real spots of beauty (and natural beauty is the hook that gets visitors to visit, or more likely in the the case of Kansas, linger in, a state). But, everyone from the Kansas State Farm Bureau to the legislature to the Governor&#8217;s office to the (truly extreme) state chamber of commerce don&#8217;t have a clue. Ksfarmgrrl has touched on how the water resources, including lakes, have been mismanaged. This is definitely true of state parks. However, it hasn&#8217;t necessarily been the management (we&#8217;ve had some very good people in natural resources and Wildlife and Parks, but they can only do so much when their departments are neglected) but the state government has rarely made conserving or utilizing natural resources a priority. In fact, they don&#8217;t even seem to know how. So, you get absolutely clueless crap like &#8220;Kansas, as Big as you Think&#8221; (there was actually a good slogan that was rejected in favor of this pathetic piece of pablum), state parks that have little to now funding for maintenance, much less upgrading, etc..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/two-chambers-of-two-minds-on-tourism/#comment-323308</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/two-chambers-of-two-minds-on-tourism/#comment-323308</guid>
		<description>Kansas... as wingnutty as you think...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kansas&#8230; as wingnutty as you think&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/two-chambers-of-two-minds-on-tourism/#comment-323299</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 12:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/two-chambers-of-two-minds-on-tourism/#comment-323299</guid>
		<description>Add another state agency?  Thought the republicans running the state were against growing the bureaucracy ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add another state agency?  Thought the republicans running the state were against growing the bureaucracy &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
