To all the uninitiated out there - read this and take heed. This is good stuff. Thanks….

And Nathan and his like have larger problems.

IMAGINE my surprise. There is a new ad out. I’ve seen it several times on Comedy central.

Current speaker Pelosi and former speaker of the House Newt “It is my goal to destroy the middle class” Gingrich join in a commercial to call for energy alternatives to address global climate change!

Seems the deniers and foot draggers are now almost entirely politically irrelevant.

J R sings again….

“Ch ch ch changes!”

“If you have noticed, I am not doing that anymore.

“On top of that, I have adopted your style of posting. Just throw a couple of quick jabs in and don’t come back.”

Nathan, Nathan, I don’t care what you post, whatever it is, it is ALWAYS total crap. You can jab or not, who cares you dumb ass. Go f*ck yourself; The only chance you will have with a female.

Night, night…

We sit in classrooms during college (my second time at college - no undergraduate general education course needed, thank God) and learn about mundane things such as physical, biological, chemical and etc. hazards. All day long, five days a week.

Never did the OSHA thing much as I never worked for OSHA, but did evaluate many workplaces at Tinker AFB (large Air Force Industrial Complex).

We all used the same standards and references though.

“Used to be”?

Hippocratic oath for former HAZMAT instructors?!?

:lol:

Hell, in all the famous WEblog scientific “debates” why didn’t you use the magic words, “former HAZMAT instructor,” a lot earlier and spare us all a lot of egg on our chins?

“The GORACLE is not a scientist, yet you praise his every move” NOT TRUE and you know it.

Science has its own sort of “Hippocratic Oath” and when we see actions that will endanger people we are required to speak up. That is true if we know a dangerous chemical is being improperly marketed and it applies here as well.
—————————————

So do I Ben. I used to be a certified HAZMAT instructor that taught other professionals. I was the dude that went into laboratories, places of industries and over viewed local teams to see if they were in compliance with Federal and State Standards.

However, as you said, you’re the scientist. The rest of of ignorant sheep don’t know anything.

Your man Bush has repudiated your head-in-the-sand denial of global warming.

Let’s hear you say, “George W. Bush is wrong.”

Or were you wrong when you said global warming is nothing?

It’s got to be one or the other . . . so which is it?

Remember too that the deniers of global warming and the foot draggers are increasingly marginalized out of the discussion.

There’s a REASON why the fossil fuel companies are flooding the airwaves with how eco friendly they pretend to be.

They feel the ground sliding out from under them.

J R sings…
Ch ch ch changes!

It was the usual for bush.

You know. Bad.

Lots “the right thing to do yada yada the wrong thing to do yada yada.

bush’s take on the matter is irrelevant. His whole presidency is at this point.

Climate change is real. Man’s activities DO contribute and we are GOING to address it.

And if some have to be dragged kicking and screaming outta the dinosaur fuel age? Well then I am game.

Let me clear it up for you. What Bush says finally is right about global warming. What he’s doing and what he’s done is exactly nothing.

So he’s both right (in his opinion) after saying nothing for 7 years as President and a miserable failure in doing anything in a timely manner.

******

As for Reguliar’s assertion that Bush “wasn’t talking about global warming” or some such nonsense, here’s the actual article:

President Bush warmed to the possibility of reduced greenhouse gas emissions Wednesday, fueling the ongoing debate over a Kansas coal power plant.

Bush proposed that by 2025, the country halt the growth of carbon dioxide emissions, which many scientists link to global warming.

He offered few specifics on how to attain that goal, but singled out power plants as needing attention.

“To reach our 2025 goal, we’ll need to more rapidly slow the growth of power sector greenhouse gas emissions so they peak within 10 to 15 years, and decline thereafter,” he said, according to a transcript of his speech.

“By doing so, we’ll reduce emission levels in the power sector well below where they were projected to be when we first announced our climate strategy in 2002.”

The leaders of this country could be Democrat or Republican and it still wouldn’t make a difference what direction this country is headed. I implore all of you to please stop fighting about Republican and Democratic views. It’s all pointless. They are the exact same as far as long term planning for the country is concerned.

The biggest problem this country has is not global warming. It’s the Federal Reserve System. If you destroy that, I would promise all of you that society would become increasingly better, as well as your lifestyle.

Just my 2 cents.

Developing Nations Rip Bush Emission-Cut Plan

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120845683885323553.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

What a miserable failure of president. What a miserable failure of a man

CapnAmerica
Posted April 17, 2008 at 3:34 pm | Permalink
Hey, wing-nuts?

Aren’t you forgetting something?

Your man Bush has repudiated your head-in-the-sand view of global warming.

=============================================

Capn can’t figure out if Bush is a miserable failure or one of his own. Poor confused Capn. Capn bashes Bush in his opening post after regurgitating the WEBlog editors dissaproval of Bush’s climate change stance.

Then Capn proceeds to side with Bush on his effort to reduce CO2 emissions.

Which is it Capn, miserable failure (based on your own words today) or is Bush right?

Science has its own sort of “Hippocratic Oath” and when we see actions that will endanger people we are required to speak up. That is true if we know a dangerous chemical is being improperly marketed and it applies here as well.

http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSL17891846

Sorry Crapn, you are too little of a man to impose your will on me.

Like I said, it sucks to be you.

regular - I have never calimed to have published in that field - my peer-reviewed publications are in other science fields. That is why I go to that literature rather than solely to my own.
————————————-
As do I.

Unless you care to be arrogant about it and state you are the only one that understands science.

The GORACLE is not a scientist, yet you praise his every move. What’s up with that?

I’ll tell you what is up with that. It’s a politically driven agenda, that when non-scientists such as Gore use power and money to promote his ideologies, it no longer becomes science but politics.

That’s where I and others come into play. When have an absolute right to display whatever objectives we dislike about the politically driven alarmist movement.

Scientists give concepts, theories and ideas, they don’t force those down people’s throats.

Or is that a part of science that is only taught in the Liberal side of science?

Even the IPCC admits there are too many “uncertainties” to predict accurately.

Nuclear I support. Coal RESEARCH I support. But not “stay the coal course” which is what Bush outlined.

Here’s the guy who badgered cosmos to death about “his science degree?” but since you have a PhD in science, he now claims it’s not important.

It’s like how he was once married and then he was never married, or how he served in Vietnam but then he was too young to have served in Vietnam, or how he was never going to post here after Jan 1st and yet he’s still posting on April 17th.

His goals set to 2025 is no different that other plans in place to make the U.S. energy independent. Bush hasn’t taken his eye off the ball.

The Libs are as usual, following their own path and re-interpreted what Bush stated.

Let’s hear you say, “George W. Bush is wrong.”

Or we’re you wrong when you said global warming is nothing?

It’s got to be one or the other . . . so which is it?