Comments on: Tiahrt still a warming skeptic

By: mypharmalifex

mypharmalifex — Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:00:42 +0000

Great

WBR,
Alex
http://www.world-viagra.com - my favourite drug-store
my favourite drug-store

By: halle berry billy bob thornton

halle berry billy bob thornton — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:58:58 +0000

halle berry billy bob thornton…

Thanks for the nice read, keep up the interesting posts…..

By: petroleum refining industry

petroleum refining industry — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:49:55 +0000

petroleum refining industry…

Man i love reading your blog, interesting posts !…

By: anna paquin and

anna paquin and — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 08:34:13 +0000

anna paquin and…

Thanks for the nice read, keep up the interesting posts…..

By: Briefcase Computer

Briefcase Computer — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 03:56:03 +0000

Briefcase Computer…

Hey, i should have been reading this earlier, it’s very informative in certain aspects for me. But i believed some of people here might disagree with some of your thought. Anyway, thank you for sharing. I would love to read your thought in the future …

By: Sell My House As Is Houston

Sell My House As Is Houston — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:26:14 +0000

Sell My House As Is Houston…

This article sounds well, but how everything is related together?…

By: Robinson Tylor Kerry

Robinson Tylor Kerry — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:02:46 +0000

Robinson Tylor Kerry…

…

By: business college metro

business college metro — Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:27:57 +0000

business college metro…

Interestingly, this was on CNN last week….

By: Pages tagged "skeptic"

Pages tagged "skeptic" — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:18:44 +0000

[...] tagged skepticOwn a Wordpress blog? Make monetization easier with the WP Affiliate Pro plugin. Tiahrt still a warming skeptic saved by 2 others nicbh bookmarked on 04/09/08 | [...]

By: Carpet Boy

Carpet Boy — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 04:21:21 +0000

Carpet Boy…

…

By: WSClark

WSClark — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 05:00:46 +0000

“No one does that unless they are totally insane.”

And McCluer, the attention seeking troll, homophobic lunatic, fifty seven year old virgin, wannabe everything, but actually just a lonely old man playing with himself in his basement with no friends, no family, no love except his 3D blow up doll Rosie, and he wants to call someone insane?

McCluer has yet to have an adult relationship with a woman. He has no friends. He is just a lonely, broken down old man with nothing.

He only blogs - that is his life - that is all he is.

McLoser.

By: cosmos

cosmos — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 04:48:16 +0000

jimmymac… you have proven many times on this blog that you are a liar.

That’s jimmymac’s fault, and jimmymac’s responsibility, not mine.

By: cosmos

cosmos — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 04:45:03 +0000

Thank you, Boxlock.

Adding to my 8:46 pm list,

* Boxlock makes false claims about what I believe, and understand about climate science.

By: Boxlock

Boxlock — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 04:20:27 +0000

Regular,
You know them better than I, but from what I’ve read, I’ll agree with your opinion on both…the loon and the trailer trash.
Now like a sensible person I am heading to bed, plus I’m afraid the loon and inbreed might be contagious, even through the keyboard, so I’m out a here.
Night all,

By: J R

J R — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 04:17:39 +0000

Prove me wrong.

I agree to meet “Boxlock” and “Regular” any place any time.

By: Regular

Regular — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 04:14:35 +0000

J R = trailer trash, ignore him - he has a pickled brain from inbreeding.

By: J R

J R — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 04:13:31 +0000

“Boxlock”= “Regular” = the multi nic troller James McCluer.

By: Regular

Regular — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 04:10:56 +0000

You’ll change your mind when he posts comments totally off topic in other threads that have nothing to do with what is being discussed, so he can put in his spiel about GW, or say something “like Boxlock falsely states or Boxlock lies when…” and he does that daily for year.

Then, you’ll change your mind about his sanity.

The guy is a 100 percent loon.

By: Boxlock

Boxlock — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 04:03:46 +0000

Oh, and I might add;
The Earth will take care of itself, and will do so without checking in with cosmos for his, or his scientist’s, approval.

By: Boxlock

Boxlock — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 04:00:48 +0000

Regular,
Though I rarely, if ever, disagree with you, I disagree. Cosmos WOULD be dangerous if he weren’t so completely ineffectual at doing anything except droning on and on, but accomplishing absolutely nothing except boring readers.
What cosmos is completely blind to when saying I don’t understand the difference between scientific methodology and religion is he has made a religion out of his science. And, what really shows his naivety is that he seems incapable of realizing there are many factors his ’scientists’ and computer models and peer reviews don’t yet know and understand and factor in. He thinks he has all the answers now, yet as we’ve seen he can do and effect NOTHING.

By: Regular

Regular — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 03:42:14 +0000

At least Boxlock, cosmos doesn’t stalk you across threads for a entire year, making the same asinine comment about the Sierra Club over and over for a year.

Personally, I think cosmos is an insane nut dangerous to society.

No one does that unless they are totally insane.

By: cosmos

cosmos — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 03:33:53 +0000

Thank you, Boxlock.

Adding to my 8:46 pm list,

* Boxlock does not understand the huge difference between scientific methodology, and “religion”.

(plus Boxlock posts more false ad hominems, and another OT rant).

By: Boxlock

Boxlock — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 03:16:04 +0000

No cosmos, you simply do not read anything except what you what to be the case.
It is your RELIGION.
But many, or most, are simply sick of your one topic monotone monologue. Many JUST DON’T CARE, and are sick of listening to you.
I was making an analogy that you are impotent on this topic, and who knows what else, you can’t effect anything, and that just maybe a little nitric oxide would actually help you.
END….you’re boring!

By: cosmos

cosmos — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 02:46:17 +0000

Boxlock,

To sum up your arguments so far,

* Humans cannot change Earth’s climate. So a massive nuclear war, causing dust to greatly reduce solar energy = no effect?

* “OH HOGWASH!” (very persuasive, Not!)

* Various personal insults and false ad hominems.

* Falsely claiming that I confused N2O with NO.

* Falsely claiming that I advocated N2O reductions.

* The very vague ‘nature emits greater amounts than humans’, which is irrelevant, considering the long “lifetime” of the gases.

But I guess that is the best that you can do Boxlock, since you do not have any credible science to support your opinions.

By: Boxlock

Boxlock — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 01:48:55 +0000

cosmos drones on, and on, and on,……., and …on…
“Nitrous oxide, N2O, is a “greenhouse” gas.”

From my earlier reference;
“As with carbon monoxide, nature emits greater amounts of these gases than humans do. The leading natural causes include the decomposition of soil, bacterial activity and lightning.
The increasing use of nitrogenous fertilizers is among the reasons that emissions of N2O have been on the rise.”

How ya gone’a stop those natural causes cosmos, like decomposition of soil, bacterial activity and lighting…that’s what I want to see you do cosmos, stop the lighting.
And there is a big world to feed out there cosmos, ya want to stop using fertilizers and starve folks to satisfy your “peer review” scientists over science certainly not everybody even agrees with.