<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The costs of McCainâ€™s gas-tax holiday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:57:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-344806</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 05:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-344806</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Angie...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Angie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-344807</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 05:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-344807</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stock Investing Because Htm</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-343080</link>
		<dc:creator>Stock Investing Because Htm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 10:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-343080</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Stock Investing Because Htm...&lt;/strong&gt;

In the end, everything is a gag. Charlie Chaplin....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Stock Investing Because Htm&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>In the end, everything is a gag. Charlie Chaplin&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Electric Gas Saving</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-341589</link>
		<dc:creator>Electric Gas Saving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 00:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-341589</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Electric Gas Saving...&lt;/strong&gt;

Interesting - because that is the same thing I found out last Thursday....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Electric Gas Saving&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Interesting &#8211; because that is the same thing I found out last Thursday&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: click here</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-337653</link>
		<dc:creator>click here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 02:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-337653</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;click here...&lt;/strong&gt;

fuel saving is what we need...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>click here&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>fuel saving is what we need&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggotpunk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334811</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggotpunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334811</guid>
		<description>&quot;You Socialists are full of gimme, gimme, gimme. Do not attempt to confuse your greed by warping the definition of Socialism, because you will fail. But then, you Socialists are used to failing.&quot;

Socialist countries have the highest standard of living.  Notice how the British pound, the Canadian dollar, the Japanese Yen and the Euro aren&#039;t falling the way the American dollar is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You Socialists are full of gimme, gimme, gimme. Do not attempt to confuse your greed by warping the definition of Socialism, because you will fail. But then, you Socialists are used to failing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Socialist countries have the highest standard of living.  Notice how the British pound, the Canadian dollar, the Japanese Yen and the Euro aren&#8217;t falling the way the American dollar is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggotpunk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334809</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggotpunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334809</guid>
		<description>Max, proper role of government?  Do you mean?

&quot;establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence,[1] promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity&quot;

Sounds like the proper role of government is to be socialist.  Other socialist programs like police, fire department, education, and health care benefit everyone as well.  All these programs increase security and productivity.  On the other hand there are fascist policies like corporate welfare to companies like Exxon that has the purpose of enriching shareholders at taxpayer expense.  But when the Democrats suggested removing some of those subsidies from the top five oil companies the Republicans whined that the welfare was a necessary government program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max, proper role of government?  Do you mean?</p>
<p>&#8220;establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence,[1] promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity&#8221;</p>
<p>Sounds like the proper role of government is to be socialist.  Other socialist programs like police, fire department, education, and health care benefit everyone as well.  All these programs increase security and productivity.  On the other hand there are fascist policies like corporate welfare to companies like Exxon that has the purpose of enriching shareholders at taxpayer expense.  But when the Democrats suggested removing some of those subsidies from the top five oil companies the Republicans whined that the welfare was a necessary government program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaxGrobnik</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334701</link>
		<dc:creator>MaxGrobnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334701</guid>
		<description>CF2K
Posted April 21, 2008 at 7:41 am &#124; Permalink
Dear Nazi,

What Phantom said. As for the poor oil companies and their risky ventures, cry me a river.
------------------------------------------

Full of HATE and JEALOUSY for those who are successful, CFUK is a typical Radical Liberal.  Not a rational comment in his pea-sized brain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CF2K<br />
Posted April 21, 2008 at 7:41 am | Permalink<br />
Dear Nazi,</p>
<p>What Phantom said. As for the poor oil companies and their risky ventures, cry me a river.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Full of HATE and JEALOUSY for those who are successful, CFUK is a typical Radical Liberal.  Not a rational comment in his pea-sized brain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaxGrobnik</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334698</link>
		<dc:creator>MaxGrobnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334698</guid>
		<description>Actually, highways are within the proper role of the government. This is not a socialist program.

Highways benefit EVERYONE, and are located on public land. Everyone here benefits from the highways. Everyone who buys gas, license fees, registration fees, tolls, etc.. pays for the highways.

Socialist programs rob from one group to give to another group. One group pays for another group. That is, one group gets benefits and the other does not. And one group pays, and the other does not. One groups hoards their Socialist benefits as their private property, for their private use. The other group gets up everyday and goes to work, and pays their taxes. The other group, does not.

You Socialists are full of gimme, gimme, gimme. Do not attempt to confuse your greed by warping the definition of Socialism, because you will fail. But then, you Socialists are used to failing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, highways are within the proper role of the government. This is not a socialist program.</p>
<p>Highways benefit EVERYONE, and are located on public land. Everyone here benefits from the highways. Everyone who buys gas, license fees, registration fees, tolls, etc.. pays for the highways.</p>
<p>Socialist programs rob from one group to give to another group. One group pays for another group. That is, one group gets benefits and the other does not. And one group pays, and the other does not. One groups hoards their Socialist benefits as their private property, for their private use. The other group gets up everyday and goes to work, and pays their taxes. The other group, does not.</p>
<p>You Socialists are full of gimme, gimme, gimme. Do not attempt to confuse your greed by warping the definition of Socialism, because you will fail. But then, you Socialists are used to failing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax &#187; Comment on The costs of McCain’s gas-tax holiday by John McCain &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334627</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax &#187; Comment on The costs of McCain’s gas-tax holiday by John McCain &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334627</guid>
		<description>[...] John McCain News &#194;&#187; Blog Archive &#194;&#187; Comment on The costs of McCain&#226;??s... wrote an interesting post today on Comment on The costs of McCain&#226;??s gas-tax holiday by John McCain &#8230;Here&#039;s a quick excerpt[…] Read the rest of this great post here […] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John McCain News &Acirc;&raquo; Blog Archive &Acirc;&raquo; Comment on The costs of McCain&acirc;??s&#8230; wrote an interesting post today on Comment on The costs of McCain&acirc;??s gas-tax holiday by John McCain &#8230;Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt[…] Read the rest of this great post here […] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phantom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334617</link>
		<dc:creator>Phantom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334617</guid>
		<description>Interesting comments I read this morning. Guess oil just needs to find its &#039;real price&#039; (whatever the market will bear).
&quot;Abdullah el al-Badri, secretary-general of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, said Sunday that oil prices would likely go higher and that the group was ready to raise production if the price pressure was due to a shortage of supply -- something he doubted.

&quot;Oil prices, there is a common understanding that has nothing to do with supply and demand,&quot; al-Badri said on the sidelines of an energy conference in Rome.

Also over the weekend, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was quoted Saturday as saying crude oil prices at $115 a barrel are too low, and that oil must &quot;discover its real value.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comments I read this morning. Guess oil just needs to find its &#8216;real price&#8217; (whatever the market will bear).<br />
&#8220;Abdullah el al-Badri, secretary-general of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, said Sunday that oil prices would likely go higher and that the group was ready to raise production if the price pressure was due to a shortage of supply &#8212; something he doubted.</p>
<p>&#8220;Oil prices, there is a common understanding that has nothing to do with supply and demand,&#8221; al-Badri said on the sidelines of an energy conference in Rome.</p>
<p>Also over the weekend, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was quoted Saturday as saying crude oil prices at $115 a barrel are too low, and that oil must &#8220;discover its real value.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF2K</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334614</link>
		<dc:creator>CF2K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334614</guid>
		<description>Dear Nazi,

What Phantom said.  As for the poor oil companies and their risky ventures, cry me a river.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Nazi,</p>
<p>What Phantom said.  As for the poor oil companies and their risky ventures, cry me a river.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McCain News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Comment on The costs of McCain’s gas-tax holiday by John McCain &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334611</link>
		<dc:creator>John McCain News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Comment on The costs of McCain’s gas-tax holiday by John McCain &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334611</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax &#187; Comment on The costs of McCain’s gas-tax holiday by Tax » Comment &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334604</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax &#187; Comment on The costs of McCain’s gas-tax holiday by Tax » Comment &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334604</guid>
		<description>[...] Tax &#194;&#187; Comment on The costs of McCain&#226;??s gas-tax holiday by annie_moose wrote an interesting post today on Comment on The costs of McCain&#226;??s gas-tax holiday by Tax &#194;&#187; Comment &#8230;Here&#039;s a quick excerptannie_moose wrote an interesting post today on Comment on The costs of McCainâ??s gas-tax holiday by annie_mooseHere’sa quick excerptfor the dynamic dou, grim and franklin. http://earthtrends.wri.org/updates/node/292. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tax &Acirc;&raquo; Comment on The costs of McCain&acirc;??s gas-tax holiday by annie_moose wrote an interesting post today on Comment on The costs of McCain&acirc;??s gas-tax holiday by Tax &Acirc;&raquo; Comment &#8230;Here&#8217;s a quick excerptannie_moose wrote an interesting post today on Comment on The costs of McCainâ??s gas-tax holiday by annie_mooseHere’sa quick excerptfor the dynamic dou, grim and franklin. <a href="http://earthtrends.wri.org/updates/node/292" rel="nofollow">http://earthtrends.wri.org/updates/node/292</a>. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax &#187; Comment on The costs of McCain’s gas-tax holiday by static</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334603</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax &#187; Comment on The costs of McCain’s gas-tax holiday by static</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334603</guid>
		<description>[...] static wrote an interesting post today on Comment on The costs of McCain&#226;??s gas-tax holiday by staticHere&#039;s a quick excerptThe windfall profits a tax was a tax on petroleum at the well head. No effect on the price of fuel. At best it offset the Federal government’s extra costs caused by rising energy costs. Fuels are a commodity, the price is set in part by &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] static wrote an interesting post today on Comment on The costs of McCain&acirc;??s gas-tax holiday by staticHere&#8217;s a quick excerptThe windfall profits a tax was a tax on petroleum at the well head. No effect on the price of fuel. At best it offset the Federal government’s extra costs caused by rising energy costs. Fuels are a commodity, the price is set in part by &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McCain News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Comment on The costs of McCain’s gas-tax holiday by Tax » Comment &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334602</link>
		<dc:creator>John McCain News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Comment on The costs of McCain’s gas-tax holiday by Tax » Comment &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334602</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McCain News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Comment on The costs of McCain’s gas-tax holiday by static</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334601</link>
		<dc:creator>John McCain News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Comment on The costs of McCain’s gas-tax holiday by static</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334601</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggotpunk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334589</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggotpunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 07:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334589</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wasn’t it Eisenhower that pushed the national Interstate system?&quot;

Yup, and he&#039;d be denounced as a socialist by folks like Paul and Max.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wasn’t it Eisenhower that pushed the national Interstate system?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yup, and he&#8217;d be denounced as a socialist by folks like Paul and Max.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: static</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334588</link>
		<dc:creator>static</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 07:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334588</guid>
		<description>The windfall profits a tax was a tax on petroleum at the well head.  No effect on the price of fuel.  At best it offset the Federal government&#039;s extra costs caused by rising energy costs.  Fuels are a commodity, the price is set in part by the speculators, sure the price of fuel can rise to the point it renders the &quot;holiday&quot; moot, but hey can also rise anyway. The &quot;liberals&quot; like high gas prices, what&#039;s the logic behind that one?  Not that I don&#039;t recognize what the proposed holiday for what it is, election year political maneuvering.  Democrats will be forced to vote for it and it can only benefit McCain come November</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The windfall profits a tax was a tax on petroleum at the well head.  No effect on the price of fuel.  At best it offset the Federal government&#8217;s extra costs caused by rising energy costs.  Fuels are a commodity, the price is set in part by the speculators, sure the price of fuel can rise to the point it renders the &#8220;holiday&#8221; moot, but hey can also rise anyway. The &#8220;liberals&#8221; like high gas prices, what&#8217;s the logic behind that one?  Not that I don&#8217;t recognize what the proposed holiday for what it is, election year political maneuvering.  Democrats will be forced to vote for it and it can only benefit McCain come November</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax &#187; Comment on The costs of McCain’s gas-tax holiday by annie_moose</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334585</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax &#187; Comment on The costs of McCain’s gas-tax holiday by annie_moose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334585</guid>
		<description>[...] annie_moose wrote an interesting post today on Comment on The costs of McCain&#226;??s gas-tax holiday by annie_mooseHere&#039;s a quick excerptfor the dynamic dou, grim and franklin. http://earthtrends.wri.org/updates/node/292. Food aid agencies are feeling the pinch, too; last week, Josette Sheeran, the head of the United Nations’ World Food Program, reported that global food &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] annie_moose wrote an interesting post today on Comment on The costs of McCain&acirc;??s gas-tax holiday by annie_mooseHere&#8217;s a quick excerptfor the dynamic dou, grim and franklin. <a href="http://earthtrends.wri.org/updates/node/292" rel="nofollow">http://earthtrends.wri.org/updates/node/292</a>. Food aid agencies are feeling the pinch, too; last week, Josette Sheeran, the head of the United Nations’ World Food Program, reported that global food &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regular</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334567</link>
		<dc:creator>Regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334567</guid>
		<description>#
Rage
Posted April 20, 2008 at 11:39 pm &#124; Permalink

Reg, one can argue, flatulently, as to how “conservative” Ike was by 1950’s standards (not much, actually–why did he need Nixon?), but that’s beside the point.

IMHO, Doug is talking about what counts for conservative now .
------------------------
Ummm, lay off the high blend Rage.

I know what he meant, I meant and what Eisenhower stood for and did.

nuff said...

Doug can stand on his own hind legs, besides we are kinfolk. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#<br />
Rage<br />
Posted April 20, 2008 at 11:39 pm | Permalink</p>
<p>Reg, one can argue, flatulently, as to how “conservative” Ike was by 1950’s standards (not much, actually–why did he need Nixon?), but that’s beside the point.</p>
<p>IMHO, Doug is talking about what counts for conservative now .<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Ummm, lay off the high blend Rage.</p>
<p>I know what he meant, I meant and what Eisenhower stood for and did.</p>
<p>nuff said&#8230;</p>
<p>Doug can stand on his own hind legs, besides we are kinfolk. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rage</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334566</link>
		<dc:creator>Rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334566</guid>
		<description>Reg, one can argue, flatulently, as to how &quot;conservative&quot; Ike was by 1950&#039;s standards (not much, actually--why did he need Nixon?), but that&#039;s beside the point.

IMHO, Doug is talking about what counts for conservative &lt;i&gt; now &lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reg, one can argue, flatulently, as to how &#8220;conservative&#8221; Ike was by 1950&#8217;s standards (not much, actually&#8211;why did he need Nixon?), but that&#8217;s beside the point.</p>
<p>IMHO, Doug is talking about what counts for conservative <i> now </i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regular</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334563</link>
		<dc:creator>Regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334563</guid>
		<description>#
Maggotpunk
Posted April 20, 2008 at 11:16 pm &#124; Permalink

Are the conservatives bitter because without the socialist highway program we wouldn’t have any interstate highways? Let the conservatives have their way and we’d be lucky to have dirt roads.
-------------------------
Wasn&#039;t it Eisenhower that pushed the national Interstate system? :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#<br />
Maggotpunk<br />
Posted April 20, 2008 at 11:16 pm | Permalink</p>
<p>Are the conservatives bitter because without the socialist highway program we wouldn’t have any interstate highways? Let the conservatives have their way and we’d be lucky to have dirt roads.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Wasn&#8217;t it Eisenhower that pushed the national Interstate system? :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggotpunk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334562</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggotpunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334562</guid>
		<description>Are the conservatives bitter because without the socialist highway program we wouldn&#039;t have any interstate highways?  Let the conservatives have their way and we&#039;d be lucky to have dirt roads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the conservatives bitter because without the socialist highway program we wouldn&#8217;t have any interstate highways?  Let the conservatives have their way and we&#8217;d be lucky to have dirt roads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annie_moose</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334553</link>
		<dc:creator>annie_moose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 03:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/the-costs-of-mccain%e2%80%99s-gas-tax-holiday/#comment-334553</guid>
		<description>for the dynamic dou, grim and franklin

http://earthtrends.wri.org/updates/node/292

Food aid agencies are feeling the pinch, too; last week, Josette Sheeran, the head of the United Nations&#039; World Food Program, reported that global food reserves were at their lowest level in 30 years and the agency faces a $500 million shortfall in 2008.

Some of this inflation can be attributed to short-term production shortfalls. But many of factors driving food price increases are more lasting, and their effects are likely to be felt for several years at least. The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, along with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, identified the following root causes for food price inflation in 2007:


Agricultural subsidies in developed countries that make more efficient production in developing countries unprofitable; 
Decreases in food stocks; 
Rising fuel prices; 
Increased demand for some products, such as meat, particularly in rapidly emerging markets such as China and India; 
Growth in biofuels production (see figure 2 below); and 
Speculation in agricultural commodity markets. 
Global population increases and climate change are also contributing to rising prices. The global population is expected to exceed 9 billion within the next 50 years, and simultaneously the impacts of climate change are predicted to reduce agricultural productivity by as much as 50% in some parts of the world, most notably sub-Saharan Africa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for the dynamic dou, grim and franklin</p>
<p><a href="http://earthtrends.wri.org/updates/node/292" rel="nofollow">http://earthtrends.wri.org/updates/node/292</a></p>
<p>Food aid agencies are feeling the pinch, too; last week, Josette Sheeran, the head of the United Nations&#8217; World Food Program, reported that global food reserves were at their lowest level in 30 years and the agency faces a $500 million shortfall in 2008.</p>
<p>Some of this inflation can be attributed to short-term production shortfalls. But many of factors driving food price increases are more lasting, and their effects are likely to be felt for several years at least. The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, along with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, identified the following root causes for food price inflation in 2007:</p>
<p>Agricultural subsidies in developed countries that make more efficient production in developing countries unprofitable;<br />
Decreases in food stocks;<br />
Rising fuel prices;<br />
Increased demand for some products, such as meat, particularly in rapidly emerging markets such as China and India;<br />
Growth in biofuels production (see figure 2 below); and<br />
Speculation in agricultural commodity markets.<br />
Global population increases and climate change are also contributing to rising prices. The global population is expected to exceed 9 billion within the next 50 years, and simultaneously the impacts of climate change are predicted to reduce agricultural productivity by as much as 50% in some parts of the world, most notably sub-Saharan Africa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
