<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shouldnâ€™t Chelsea Clinton be ready to discuss Lewinsky?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Songbird</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-325447</link>
		<dc:creator>Songbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-325447</guid>
		<description>Mary said:  "holding onto anger and resentment rots us from the inside out."

Yes, that's a very valid point.  However, there's a difference between a bad relationship and no relationship.  There's a difference between "saying the wrong thing" and somnambulance.  At the wrong time.  'Specially when the m---erf---er knew - acutely - of whence I spoke.

I don't intend to elaborate.  But I guess it's untrue to say I don't have any feelings left for the former literary lion.  Yesterday after I left that post, I actually teared up - just thinking of him listening to Poke-Salad Annie with any solicitude.

That'd be like me lying in repose with Rush-boogie's rotting corpse, whenever he croaks from opiate abuse.  Just too icky to think about......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary said:  &#8220;holding onto anger and resentment rots us from the inside out.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, that&#8217;s a very valid point.  However, there&#8217;s a difference between a bad relationship and no relationship.  There&#8217;s a difference between &#8220;saying the wrong thing&#8221; and somnambulance.  At the wrong time.  &#8216;Specially when the m&#8212;erf&#8212;er knew - acutely - of whence I spoke.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t intend to elaborate.  But I guess it&#8217;s untrue to say I don&#8217;t have any feelings left for the former literary lion.  Yesterday after I left that post, I actually teared up - just thinking of him listening to Poke-Salad Annie with any solicitude.</p>
<p>That&#8217;d be like me lying in repose with Rush-boogie&#8217;s rotting corpse, whenever he croaks from opiate abuse.  Just too icky to think about&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-325439</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-325439</guid>
		<description>Bill Clinton isn't running for office, and since I doubt that either Hillary or Chelsea ever slept with Monica. The question is way off base and didn't even deserve the "It's none of your business!" response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Clinton isn&#8217;t running for office, and since I doubt that either Hillary or Chelsea ever slept with Monica. The question is way off base and didn&#8217;t even deserve the &#8220;It&#8217;s none of your business!&#8221; response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-325076</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-325076</guid>
		<description>"imagining Ann Coulter naked"

Dang, dinner just came up just thinking about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;imagining Ann Coulter naked&#8221;</p>
<p>Dang, dinner just came up just thinking about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Caruso</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-325073</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Caruso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-325073</guid>
		<description>I hope before you leave this world, you find it in your heart to forgive your brother, Song...holding onto anger and resentment rots us from the inside out.
Granted, you may not want him in your life..but it still heals to clear the air.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope before you leave this world, you find it in your heart to forgive your brother, Song&#8230;holding onto anger and resentment rots us from the inside out.<br />
Granted, you may not want him in your life..but it still heals to clear the air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Songbird</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324852</link>
		<dc:creator>Songbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324852</guid>
		<description>Coulter/Limbaugh?  Can you imagine the offspring, er, spawn of spewage, those two would bring forth?  

Oh, me Lawdie:  I can't bear to think of it.  

I also can't bear to think of my brother, whom I haven't seen in 20 years, converting to conservatism.  'Cause every conservative male I've ever spoken with just LOVES Ms. Coulter.  

Not to be crude - but they'd drag their a$$ through broken glass....in the pouring rain....just to catch a glimpse of her (feline) in a mud puddle.

I no longer have a relationship with my only surviving sibling, but I would hope someone with a genius-level IQ ain't that stupid.  

'Cause that just makes me feel dreadful - to think he'd be glommin' on to Mighty Hermaphrodite.  A young man whose literary prowess once surpassed John Lennon's "In His Own Write."  A young man whose pacifism matched Beavis &#38; Butthead's gentle music teacher......

Oh, I cain't take it any more.  It's just too much.

Tennis, anyone?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coulter/Limbaugh?  Can you imagine the offspring, er, spawn of spewage, those two would bring forth?  </p>
<p>Oh, me Lawdie:  I can&#8217;t bear to think of it.  </p>
<p>I also can&#8217;t bear to think of my brother, whom I haven&#8217;t seen in 20 years, converting to conservatism.  &#8216;Cause every conservative male I&#8217;ve ever spoken with just LOVES Ms. Coulter.  </p>
<p>Not to be crude - but they&#8217;d drag their a$$ through broken glass&#8230;.in the pouring rain&#8230;.just to catch a glimpse of her (feline) in a mud puddle.</p>
<p>I no longer have a relationship with my only surviving sibling, but I would hope someone with a genius-level IQ ain&#8217;t that stupid.  </p>
<p>&#8216;Cause that just makes me feel dreadful - to think he&#8217;d be glommin&#8217; on to Mighty Hermaphrodite.  A young man whose literary prowess once surpassed John Lennon&#8217;s &#8220;In His Own Write.&#8221;  A young man whose pacifism matched Beavis &amp; Butthead&#8217;s gentle music teacher&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Oh, I cain&#8217;t take it any more.  It&#8217;s just too much.</p>
<p>Tennis, anyone?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324840</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324840</guid>
		<description>How about Coulter WITH Limbaugh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Coulter WITH Limbaugh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SolDevVB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324838</link>
		<dc:creator>SolDevVB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324838</guid>
		<description>WSClark
Posted April 3, 2008 at 1:40 pm &#124; Permalink
Everybody knows that your parents don’t have sex.


LMFAO. Best post I've seen in a while. Kudos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WSClark<br />
Posted April 3, 2008 at 1:40 pm | Permalink<br />
Everybody knows that your parents don’t have sex.</p>
<p>LMFAO. Best post I&#8217;ve seen in a while. Kudos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Songbird</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324837</link>
		<dc:creator>Songbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324837</guid>
		<description>EE-yew...............yewie, fooey.

Parents shouldn't speak of their sex lives to their children.  

And queries of this nature shouldn't be directed to the daughter of a public philanderer.  It's just gross.

It's just one of those things, like imagining Ann Coulter naked or watching Rush Limbaugh bone.  

It's just too grotesque for words......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EE-yew&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;yewie, fooey.</p>
<p>Parents shouldn&#8217;t speak of their sex lives to their children.  </p>
<p>And queries of this nature shouldn&#8217;t be directed to the daughter of a public philanderer.  It&#8217;s just gross.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just one of those things, like imagining Ann Coulter naked or watching Rush Limbaugh bone.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s just too grotesque for words&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phantom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324831</link>
		<dc:creator>Phantom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324831</guid>
		<description>If she'd answered that question, I bet the followup would have been "Have you or your mom ever given a Lewinski?'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If she&#8217;d answered that question, I bet the followup would have been &#8220;Have you or your mom ever given a Lewinski?&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phantom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324830</link>
		<dc:creator>Phantom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324830</guid>
		<description>Looks like the 'Nays' have this one. Next topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the &#8216;Nays&#8217; have this one. Next topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Way</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324827</link>
		<dc:creator>American Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324827</guid>
		<description>like watching old people.....................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like watching old people&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324812</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324812</guid>
		<description>Everybody knows that your parents don't have sex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody knows that your parents don&#8217;t have sex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rage</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324788</link>
		<dc:creator>Rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324788</guid>
		<description>Doug may have put it crudely, but that's the crux of the biscuit: why should a daughter have to comment on something like that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug may have put it crudely, but that&#8217;s the crux of the biscuit: why should a daughter have to comment on something like that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Way</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324775</link>
		<dc:creator>American Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324775</guid>
		<description>Doug that is more gross than the guy in love with his picnic table. (hands firmly down)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug that is more gross than the guy in love with his picnic table. (hands firmly down)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324772</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324772</guid>
		<description>Let's see a show of hands here, who wants to go into details about their parents having sex?

Apart from Rhonda, any takers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see a show of hands here, who wants to go into details about their parents having sex?</p>
<p>Apart from Rhonda, any takers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Way</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324765</link>
		<dc:creator>American Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324765</guid>
		<description>“Bill brought America the proposition that a BJ is not sex,”
Actually AmWay that was determined by the Court as rules for his deposition.


So the 3-13 minute rule does not apply to BJ's?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Bill brought America the proposition that a BJ is not sex,”<br />
Actually AmWay that was determined by the Court as rules for his deposition.</p>
<p>So the 3-13 minute rule does not apply to BJ&#8217;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teacher</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324762</link>
		<dc:creator>teacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324762</guid>
		<description>I would like to know the answer to the question. It would show where Ms. Clinton gets your strength. It might give us a glimpse of the real woman. I think it was a good question and I wish one of the Clinton women would answer it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to know the answer to the question. It would show where Ms. Clinton gets your strength. It might give us a glimpse of the real woman. I think it was a good question and I wish one of the Clinton women would answer it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: support-troops-not-the-war</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324733</link>
		<dc:creator>support-troops-not-the-war</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324733</guid>
		<description>Non issue.  Chelsea answered in the best possible manner.  A daughter should not be asked of her father's sexual indiscretions.

On the other hand, we need to ask Bush daughters as to why they are not fighting the war in Iraq that their father so strongly believes in?  Are they too rich to defend their country, or is defending the country a poor man's job?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Non issue.  Chelsea answered in the best possible manner.  A daughter should not be asked of her father&#8217;s sexual indiscretions.</p>
<p>On the other hand, we need to ask Bush daughters as to why they are not fighting the war in Iraq that their father so strongly believes in?  Are they too rich to defend their country, or is defending the country a poor man&#8217;s job?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Songbird</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324652</link>
		<dc:creator>Songbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324652</guid>
		<description>Oh-h-h-h- this is gross.  The question was vastly inappropriate.  That, to me, is the issue.  Oh, and something called "common decency."  Something which seems to be dwindling in today's culture.

Jesus Christ!  Chelsea is the DAUGHTER here!  No one whomsoever should be questioning her about her father's sexual indiscretions.  It's GROSS!  Any psychologist/psychiatrist worth his/her grain of salt would agree.  It's wholly inappropriate.

I do disagree strongly, though, with anyone else's assertion that it was none of anyone's business.  When you're the president of the USA - and you're screwing the intern (especially someone like little Ms. Monica), and the proceedings bring the government to a grinding halt (no pun intended), and when.....and this is the big one.....

Your own stupidity is at fault - not some mental defect or drug dependency or being forced to stand in for Ann Coulter's groinocologist or anything like that - the people have a right to be pi$$ed off.  

I can't forget most of the year 1998 - the media, country and government were weary of Billy's boneyard.  

I want our next President to be a man of honor and dignity.  If he falls (as so many do), I would hope it would be with a woman of discretion and dignity.  (Hint to Jennifer Flowers:  When you hold a press conference for the ostensible purpose of informing one and all about your adultery, it's rather disconcerting.)

I don't want to see James Carville going on "bimbo alert."  There are far more pressing issues confronting our nation today than some insipid intern testifying about her blue dress.  I want a President who won't let this country down.

And if he decides to cast pearl necklaces before swine, it shouldn't be our problem - or his daughter's.  

Yechchchchch....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh-h-h-h- this is gross.  The question was vastly inappropriate.  That, to me, is the issue.  Oh, and something called &#8220;common decency.&#8221;  Something which seems to be dwindling in today&#8217;s culture.</p>
<p>Jesus Christ!  Chelsea is the DAUGHTER here!  No one whomsoever should be questioning her about her father&#8217;s sexual indiscretions.  It&#8217;s GROSS!  Any psychologist/psychiatrist worth his/her grain of salt would agree.  It&#8217;s wholly inappropriate.</p>
<p>I do disagree strongly, though, with anyone else&#8217;s assertion that it was none of anyone&#8217;s business.  When you&#8217;re the president of the USA - and you&#8217;re screwing the intern (especially someone like little Ms. Monica), and the proceedings bring the government to a grinding halt (no pun intended), and when&#8230;..and this is the big one&#8230;..</p>
<p>Your own stupidity is at fault - not some mental defect or drug dependency or being forced to stand in for Ann Coulter&#8217;s groinocologist or anything like that - the people have a right to be pi$$ed off.  </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t forget most of the year 1998 - the media, country and government were weary of Billy&#8217;s boneyard.  </p>
<p>I want our next President to be a man of honor and dignity.  If he falls (as so many do), I would hope it would be with a woman of discretion and dignity.  (Hint to Jennifer Flowers:  When you hold a press conference for the ostensible purpose of informing one and all about your adultery, it&#8217;s rather disconcerting.)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to see James Carville going on &#8220;bimbo alert.&#8221;  There are far more pressing issues confronting our nation today than some insipid intern testifying about her blue dress.  I want a President who won&#8217;t let this country down.</p>
<p>And if he decides to cast pearl necklaces before swine, it shouldn&#8217;t be our problem - or his daughter&#8217;s.  </p>
<p>Yechchchchch&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghotiphaze</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324649</link>
		<dc:creator>ghotiphaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324649</guid>
		<description>Should someone ask McCain how many times he gets up in the night to piss?

age in years divided by height in feet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should someone ask McCain how many times he gets up in the night to piss?</p>
<p>age in years divided by height in feet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonkeyHawk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324644</link>
		<dc:creator>MonkeyHawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324644</guid>
		<description>It's simply tacky.

Should someone ask McCain how many times he gets up in the night to piss?  Could indicate prostate problems!

Somewhere along the last ten or fifteen years, Hillary probably went through menopause.  Did she vote for the Iraq War during a hot flash?!

Does it really matter if Obama can bowl?  (Maybe he's used to it Chicago-style: overhand.)

I would have a hard time asking any daughter of a couple that had marital difficulties about her prarents' behavior.  

It's just tacky to ask.

&lt;i&gt;"'Nathan?'  Just when did you first suspect your dad was fuc#in' picnic tables?"&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s simply tacky.</p>
<p>Should someone ask McCain how many times he gets up in the night to piss?  Could indicate prostate problems!</p>
<p>Somewhere along the last ten or fifteen years, Hillary probably went through menopause.  Did she vote for the Iraq War during a hot flash?!</p>
<p>Does it really matter if Obama can bowl?  (Maybe he&#8217;s used to it Chicago-style: overhand.)</p>
<p>I would have a hard time asking any daughter of a couple that had marital difficulties about her prarents&#8217; behavior.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s just tacky to ask.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;&#8216;Nathan?&#8217;  Just when did you first suspect your dad was fuc#in&#8217; picnic tables?&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghotiphaze</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324638</link>
		<dc:creator>ghotiphaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324638</guid>
		<description>but what in American politics represents good taste?

*nods head*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but what in American politics represents good taste?</p>
<p>*nods head*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regular</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324637</link>
		<dc:creator>Regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324637</guid>
		<description>Good answer - bad question.

case closed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good answer - bad question.</p>
<p>case closed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nano</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324636</link>
		<dc:creator>Nano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324636</guid>
		<description>I don't have any problem with either the question, or the answer. If you're going to play in politics, it can get rough. Chelsea is a grown woman. If she can't take the heat...
As for the question, it may have been in poor taste, but what in American politics represents good taste?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have any problem with either the question, or the answer. If you&#8217;re going to play in politics, it can get rough. Chelsea is a grown woman. If she can&#8217;t take the heat&#8230;<br />
As for the question, it may have been in poor taste, but what in American politics represents good taste?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324634</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/shouldn%e2%80%99t-chelsea-clinton-be-ready-to-discuss-lewinsky/#comment-324634</guid>
		<description>"Bill brought America the proposition that a BJ is not sex,"

Actually AmWay that was determined by the Court as rules for his deposition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Bill brought America the proposition that a BJ is not sex,&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually AmWay that was determined by the Court as rules for his deposition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
