Open thread 4/29

thread

196 Comments

  1. SolDevVB
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 9:32 am | Permalink

    Ha ha… I’m first. Morning (er..uh..) afternoon Kansas !!!

  2. Regular
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 9:33 am | Permalink

    Isaiah 43:11 I, even I, am the LORD; and beside me there is no Saviour.

  3. Mary_Caruso
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 9:43 am | Permalink

    So what the hell is that supposed to mean, Reg?

  4. Predestined
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 9:46 am | Permalink

    What? No National Poli thread yet this a.m.? I’m disappointed.

    So I’ll just bring this here.

    Yesterday, KFG said (referring to Obama):
    We have no idea what he means, but vote for him anyway because his campaign slogan says change.

    We have no idea what ANY of the candidates mean. The MSM wants to microfocus on the personal stuff, and the candidates are following right along, when what they should be doing is discussing and talking about the issues. McCain is free to ride his Straight Talk Express, giving us his form of b.s. and blabber all he wants, but let Obama and Hillary begin to focus on the issues, and we get Rev. Wright and sniper fire.

    Typical Republican tricks we’ve watch for the past two elections and more, yet no one demands it change. That includes those here on WEBlog. It’s way more fun to repeat ad naseum the same garbage day after day. No one…NO ONE…is going to talk about what they propose to do, until they stop being forced to defend every STUPID thing that has little bearing on what they will (try) to do for US.

  5. Regular
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 9:51 am | Permalink

    #
    Mary_Caruso
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 9:43 am | Permalink

    So what the hell is that supposed to mean, Reg?
    ————————————–
    Here’s a modern translation. :)

    I alone am the LORD, and there is no savior except me.

    It’s out of context from a chapter, but God was addressing how he is the only God and His sovereignty can’t be question and that He, God is the first and last.

  6. Mary_Caruso
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 9:54 am | Permalink

    The problem is that there are so many stupid Americans who buy into all the bulls**t and don’t really focus at all on what needs to happen to tackle the mess we’re in. It’s a distraction, kinda like watching Jerry Springer instead of the national news because they don’t have to think about the real problems and it’s a sick form of entertainment.

  7. bth
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 9:54 am | Permalink

    Regulaar – it would seem that a strict reading of that passage would negate the existence of Christ as savior.

  8. Mary_Caruso
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 9:55 am | Permalink

    Yeah, right…whatever, Reg.

  9. lindainks55
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 9:58 am | Permalink

    When you get a translation and then find there are many different translations and each one represented as the only true and correct one…

  10. Regular
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 9:58 am | Permalink

    #
    bth
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 9:54 am | Permalink

    Regulaar – it would seem that a strict reading of that passage would negate the existence of Christ as savior.
    —————
    True, if that were the only verse in the Bible.

    :)

  11. Regular
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:00 am | Permalink

    Wow, so many haters on today.

    I’ll try to put on more easier understood verses in the future.

    :roll:

  12. Mary_Caruso
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:00 am | Permalink

    No one knows who or what “god” is…it’s just all us humans trying to figure out what life is all about and everyone and every culture has their own version. No one has the true answer, they just think they do.

  13. Mary_Caruso
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:01 am | Permalink

    I don’t think I’m hateful…just realistic. It seems to me nowadays the Christians and the Islamics have the corner on hate.

  14. Mary_Caruso
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:02 am | Permalink

    And maybe the Jews, too.

  15. bth
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:02 am | Permalink

    No hate at all there Regular – just trying to interpret the verse. Especially since it is Old Testamant it is perfectly consistent with Judaism and strict monotheism. (as opposed to the Trinity concept)

  16. Predestined
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:03 am | Permalink

    Instead of trying to find out what life is all about, try living it instead. What difference does it make where we came from? We’re here. Make the best of it. Carpe diem!

  17. bth
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:04 am | Permalink

    Mary – I use the suffix IST for the hateful extremists: HindIST, IslamIST, etc etc. Unfortunately EVERY religion has its share.

  18. Mary_Caruso
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:05 am | Permalink

    Just think what the world would be like with no religion…how would we justify our hatred and intolerance of those who are different than us?

  19. Mary_Caruso
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:06 am | Permalink

    Christianist?

  20. Mary_Caruso
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:07 am | Permalink

    Amen, Pre!

  21. Regular
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:08 am | Permalink

    #
    Mary_Caruso
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:05 am | Permalink

    Just think what the world would be like with no religion…how would we justify our hatred and intolerance of those who are different than us?
    ————————–
    What it would be like, is that I would be a big Viking, slaying those who oppose me with my cruel ax and dragging the females by the hair back to quarters. :)

  22. Mary_Caruso
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:08 am | Permalink

    Gotta go..work calls
    ENJOY LIFE…It’s too short!!!!!!

  23. Predestined
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:08 am | Permalink

    Mary,

    It seems many need a “being” to believe in, something or someone to blame or thank, whatever the case may be. I don’t have a problem with that, only a problem when they expect me to buy into their beliefs, without question.

  24. lindainks55
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:09 am | Permalink

    Religious populations are all too often intolerant and mean gangs. Who tell everyone they are doing their deeds in the name of their god. And thus it has been for all of history.

  25. Regular
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:14 am | Permalink

    #
    lindainks55
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:09 am | Permalink

    Religious populations are all too often intolerant and mean gangs. Who tell everyone they are doing their deeds in the name of their god. And thus it has been for all of history.
    ———————-
    Hmmm, intolerant…

    I put one Bible verse up and it is met with all sorts of intolerance and meanness.

    Thanks all, I was cheerful starting out the day, now a bit glum.

    But, I still keep my faith. :)

  26. gster
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:17 am | Permalink

    The World’s Dumbest President ( unfortunately ours) is on NPR explaining the world and our economy. That can’t bode well for Wall Street today! It is truly an embarrassment to listen to that clown.

  27. Predestined
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:18 am | Permalink

    Regular,

    If you had been a Viking, you’d have probably believed in the Norse Gods.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norse_gods

    Note there are Goddesses listed there, too, and I doubt they’d be pleased with you dragging women around by the hair. ;)

  28. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:19 am | Permalink

    Heckler posted this link yesterday, but here’s the first part y’all gotta see!

    http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/0508/0508freedomjefferson.htm

    The natural inequality of individual freedom (Lessons from Jefferson)

    By J.B. Williams
    web posted April 28, 2008

    America is politically divided down the center line between individual freedom and a so-called greater common good. Half of the country is trying desperately to protect and preserve a maximum level of individual freedom and liberty for themselves and future generations, while the other half is desperate to take from those according to their means in order to fill the perceived needs that they have failed to fill on their own.

    Many American voters are struggling to escape the reality that freedom isn’t free and never was. They try to hide from the fact that freedom to excel bears with it the freedom to fail, and run from the truth that although freedom is quite “fair,” – equal freedom will never result in equal outcomes.

    “I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.” – Thomas Jefferson

    Half of the nation still believes what the founding fathers believed, that the risk of individual failure while in pursuit of personal excellence, is a small price to pay for the right of self-determination, absolute individual freedom and liberty.

    But over the last century, the other half have been trained to accept personal failure as a predisposed condition beyond their individual control, which can only be remedied by an increasingly intrusive central power equipped with the authority and means to strip one of his lawful earnings for the alleged benefit of another.

    “A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor and bread it has earned – this is the sum of good government.” – Thomas Jefferson

  29. ksfarmgrrl
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:20 am | Permalink

    Yeah gster, cant wait until he address the nation tonight!

    I’m glad to see you here today. Everytime I hear of a motorcycle accident, I wonder if it is one of the bike riding WE bloggers.

  30. kansassam
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:20 am | Permalink

    >I don’t think I’m hateful…just realistic. It seems to me nowadays the Christians and the Islamics have the corner on hate.<

    Mary… pretty ridiculous comment. There are hateful people everywhere… some are Christians or Islamic, but many are not. MOST Christians are not.

  31. Predestined
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:22 am | Permalink

    kansassam,

    Then I guess we hear the most from those who ARE.

    BTW, I don’t necessarily disagree with you.

  32. American_Way
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:22 am | Permalink

    “stop being forced to defend every STUPID thing”

    The candidates are not having their arms twisted. Maybe if they showed true leadership – and focused on the specific issues, the distractions would be less glaring.

    But this is nothing new. The press focuses on the personal character issues, because it is vague and requires little if any research or intelligence to pursue.

    Please remember the number of women who voted for Bill Clinton just because of his looks.

    American’s are shallow people for the most part, when it comes to politicians. And is it any wonder? Politicans stack up somewhere around whale shi- in popularity. Somewhere below lawyers (no offense to any of them).

  33. American_Way
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:26 am | Permalink

    Keep on keeping on Regular. Remember, this is the same crowd which would disagree with you if you said the sky was blue. I suspect someone didn’t have their coffee today.

    And remember, the sky is blue, regardless.

  34. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:27 am | Permalink

    AmWay, Clinton and Obama have no real issues to talk about.

    All they have left are the personal lack of character credentials of each other. Much to talk about there for sure.

  35. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:31 am | Permalink

    Do you hear Clinton or Obama talking about FREEDOM of the individual? Nope. You hear Clinton and Obama talk about how Government is going to do everything for everybody – and Government will decide who is allowed so much income and who is allowed so much welfare.

    More wise words, from Heckler’s link:

    http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/0508/0508freedomjefferson.htm

    A wise and frugal government of extremely limited power and means is exactly what our nation’s Founders put in place over 230 years ago. Half of our nation now sees these ideas as out-dated, unfair and as some form of oppression wherein the “haves” (aka self-reliant achievers) run roughshod over the “have-nots” (aka under-achieving dependents).

    America is the most generous nation on earth, always willing to help with bounty or blood, anyone unable to help themselves, here or abroad. But some seek a more progressive system by which economic equality, as defined and distributed by a central power, replaces a “greed” driven individual pursuit of happiness under capitalism, otherwise known as economic freedom.

    For half of America, the enemy is “the rich” – the profit driven corporation – the self-reliant – the self-made American. For the other half, the enemy is anyone who seeks to take from them their lawful earnings, their right of self-determination, their private property and unalienable rights, in the name of some greater good.

    “Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.” – Thomas Jefferson

    There is no greater power on earth than the power to hold the lives of others in one’s hands. The power to decide how much is enough for some and how much is too much for others is the greatest power available to man. But it is a power which is always temporary…

    In any democratic society, the best way to secure personal long-term political power is to develop a class of voters permanently dependent upon that power for their own livelihood.

    Throughout history, those who have acquired such powers have always lost themselves, once perverted by a revocable right to reign over others. Our Founders were right; all men were created to be free and thereby, unequal. The human spirit will not rest long under any form of tyranny, including that which is foolishly self-inflicted via democratic process.

  36. kansassam
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:34 am | Permalink

    >Then I guess we hear the most from those who ARE.<

    The media loves to report anything negative. And it seems those who are the most negative are also the most vocal.

  37. gster
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:35 am | Permalink

    KFG- Thanks, and no thanks to getting street rash from laying my bike down. I just never learned how to enjoy sliding on the pavement, and it’s far too hard on my PoPo!

  38. bth
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:38 am | Permalink

    Sam – I agree – the vast majority of Christians are anything BUT hateful.

    A heads-up for you: River cleanup is this Saturday. If you can put the word out to make sure bedrolls etc are ’stashed’ that should help prevent anything happening to them. At laest the groups I am involved in are careful NOT to remove anything that is not trash.

    Now for a suggestion: do you think you could get a group to clean under the Harry Bridge? If so I can get trash bags for you and arrange their pickup.

  39. kansassam
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:42 am | Permalink

    Ben..

    Let me check with some of the guys at the mission tonight. I’ll get back to you (it would have to be afternoon… does that work?)

  40. ksgrm
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:44 am | Permalink

    I love the tolerance of all the bloggers. Thank you for letting me keep my personal beliefs. I find joy each morning when I see the sunshine and thank my good Lord for the beauty of the creation. My personal belief. I don’t hate anyone.

    Now – on the political side however I am puzzled at the rhetoric coming from the left on Obama. His long time minister inserted himself squarely in the middle of his campaign. He is an issue because of this. When/if Hagee does this he too will be relevant.

    That said I want to know how Obama and Hillary plan to kick start a slowing economy. I want to know what new taxes they plan to implement. I want to know how they plan to protect our nation from those who desire to erradicate the great USofA. Lets talk issues.

    Change – well I changed the clothes I wore yesterday for the ones I am wearing today. It was change but was it an improvement? Change in itself isn’t a plan. The devil is in the details.

    Lets get back to the real campaigns.

  41. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:49 am | Permalink

    Good post ksgrm.

    On the tax increase side, it’s hard to tell from their last debate just exactly how Clinton or Obama will change taxation. They both ducked and dodged the issue, and either were ashamed to honestly say how much they will raise our taxes, or they offer no expertise on the subject.

    It’s clear they BOTH will raise taxes. For who and how much?

    Hope they answer those questions clearly, without changing their position, real soon.

  42. bth
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:51 am | Permalink

    hmmm … the City is supporting a morning cleanup. Not sure when they will be running the trash pickup. The main thrust is 10-12; I will be at L-D about 9-9:30 to pick up bags etc.

    One thing I like about morning is it is cooler – I tend to wilt in the heat.

  43. Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    I hope it does not rain Saturday.

    You have probably posted elsewhere and I just missed it Ben.

    I cam bring myself and a reluctant, whining teenager if you post some more details.

  44. American_Way
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:58 am | Permalink

    Just a public service announcement note for those waiting for their FREE MONEY from the gubermint.

    “member calls asking if we have received their Government Stimulus Check. To improve member service and reduce calls, Electronic Services has provided us with a Payment Schedule produced by the Internal Revenue Service.”

    Details:

    Stimulus Payment Schedule:

    Last 2 SSN Digits

    Direct Deposit Payment Initiated Date – 2-4 Business Days to Post

    00 – 20

    April 28

    21 – 75

    May 9

    76 – 99

    May 16

    Last 2 SSN Digits

    Paper Checks

    00 -09

    May 9

    10 – 18

    May 23

    19 – 25

    May 30

    26 – 38

    June 6

    39 – 51

    June 13

    52 – 63

    June 20

    64 – 75

    June 27

    76 – 87

    July 4

    88 – 99

    July 11

    Source: Internal Revenue Service”

    Those who regularly receive FREE MONEY already know the drill.

  45. bth
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:59 am | Permalink

    BlueJay – meet at the WATER Center (Herman Hill Park) if you want to join the South Central Neighborhood Association group. Other groups will be working other areas – Sim Park Red Bridge, Exploration Place, Gander Mountain, Lincoln Street. The main check-in site is at Lawrence Dumont.

    A couple of the bridges are real problems since the city does not routinely privide trash disposal options or pick-up. That is the reason for my ’side deal’ with KS-Sam.

  46. kansassam
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:00 am | Permalink

    OK Ben… I’ll see what I can do, that may be late enough in the morning to work. Maybe I can wake a teenager or two as well! I’ll tell the guys.. but with no transportation… who knows who will show up..

  47. Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:04 am | Permalink

    So go to LD first?

  48. bth
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:12 am | Permalink

    Thanks KS-Sam

    BlueJay – just head to the WATER Center. I’ll be bringing stuff down.

    In fact – an open invite to everyone: join in the river cleanup this saturday morning. 10 AM on the River.

  49. StevenEDavis
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:16 am | Permalink

    McCain’s tax plan summarized here:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/28/opinion/28krugman.html

    McCain would make the Bush tax cuts on the wealthiest Americans permanent. He would eliminate the Alternative Minimum Tax. He would sharply reduce corporate taxes. A continuation of Bush. He says nowhere, that I know of, his plan for reducing deficit spending and the debt.

    I believe that both Obama and Clinton have said they would do away with the Bush tax cuts on the richest of Americans. I don’t know that either have said anything about the AMT – which we need for revenue – given our borrow and spend drunken spree that we have been on the last 7, nearly 8 years. Clinton has said recently that big oil needs to pay their fair share, so that is an indirect comment on corporate taxes, from her; don’t know Obama’s view on that.

    To realize the tax cuts McCain says he wants, drastic cuts in government services will be required. [McCain should be asked what he intends to cut]. If we continue the “borrow and spend” strategy another 4 years, it is difficult to even imagine what things will look like.

    In truth, I don’t think McCain has any plans to do any of what he is promising. It is a craven attempt to kiss up to the base. Who, in reality, will never really support him.

  50. American_Way
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:35 am | Permalink

    “Obama and Clinton have said they would do away with the Bush tax cuts on the richest of Americans.”

    One said those making over 200K annually.
    The other said those making over 250K annually.

    “about the AMT – which we need for revenue”
    That’s StevenDavis spin on things. WHY do we need that particular item for revenue? Why not end/reduce the EIC payments. That would bring in revenue too. The AMT hits millions of us. It is nasty in it’s bite. It is unfair, in that it takes new victims each year by surprise, and you cannot plan to avoid it. It also is no longer performing it’s original purpose for which the AMT law was enacted – keep rich from paying little or no tax. It is now a middle income to upper middle income tax. Hardly a rich tax. Again, keeping the painful and BIG surprise bite the AMT causes is your personal opinion. But it is as valuable as my opinion of ending the Unearned Income Credit as a means toward increasing revenue.

    “Clinton has said recently that big oil needs to pay their fair share”

    What’s “fair”? And consumers will pick up whatever that amount is. You think they will “eat” the increases in taxes and decreases to their bottom line? And who is BIG OIL, heh? Millions of Americans own equity, mutual funds, or other investments in BIG OIL. Additionally, Hillary said she would use that money to fund a number of projects to include: new entitlements and reduce greenhouse gases – so NO increase to revenue here.

    “we continue the “borrow and spend” strategy another 4 years, it is difficult to even imagine what things will look like.”

    Of course you have suggested increasing revenue. But is there nothing you would cut? Defense?

    The solution to our financial crises is not simply to create more revenue, unless you live in a land of make believe. We have to cut spending. If you took every dollar the rich man makes: There isn’t enough to resolve the debt issue nor to fund the new entitlement programs you NEGLECTED to mention in your financial comparison post.

  51. SolDevVB
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:44 am | Permalink

    Get rid of :

    the DOE

    Homeland security

    All of our foreign military bases

    Bring all of our troops home.

    Restructure and or eliminate the entitlement systems.

    Close the Federal reserve and reclaim America’s billions. – Make the dollar worth something again.

    Don’t bailout the banks nor the borrowers. The gov’t isn’t here for bail outs.

    With just the listed above we could reduce personal revenue taxes by at least 50% and still have enough surplus to pay down the debt.

    Talk about stimulating the economy huh?

  52. Phantom
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:48 am | Permalink

    Bush is such a Tool!
    From his political speech today, “– Immediately violated his own pledge not to get involved in the presidential contest by asserting that McCain would be the victor. He was asked if he was concerned that his successor would not put enough emphasis on continuing the war on terrorism. “I don’t think John McCain is going to neglect the war on terror. And I do think he’s going to be president.”

  53. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:51 am | Permalink

    It all boils down to these Socialist Democrats redistributing income, through an increasingly progressive tax system.

    The Government becomes the vehicle to steal from the rich and give to the poor.

    Boo hoo, I don’t make as much as you do! I want yours! Give it to me!

    Must I bring out the tax tables again?!? The bottom 50% of tax filers, pay 3% of the total income tax. How much less tax do they want?

    The top 50% of tax filers, pay 97% of the total income tax. How much more tax do you Socialists want them to pay to fund your welfare hand-out programs like national healthcare?

    Oh, and how much more taxes be raised to try to fund the Social Security/Medicare train wreck? The end of the gravy-train railroad is now in sight – 2019.

  54. American_Way
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:53 am | Permalink

    Was his pledge not to get in the republican candidate debate?

    It would be silly to think a president would not openly endorse his parties candidate in the final election.

  55. American_Way
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:54 am | Permalink

    Not that a Bush endorsement would matter……

  56. writerdog
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:54 am | Permalink

    Amway, Clinton and Obama have no real issues to talk about

    Max I will say that none of them are really talking about the issues. If all three were passengers of the Titanic it would be going something like this,
    Mc Cain: “Well we should just set in the deck chairs and wait and see just how far the ship sinks!”
    Hillary: “The government should pay for the damage to the ship, pay for the damage to the ice berg, pay for the damage to the ego of the ship’s captain for running his ship into the ice berg, pay for the damage to the emotional state of the passengers as they die!”.
    Obama: “It will be cheaper if the government pays for part of the damage to the ship, part of the damage to the ice berg, part of the damage to the Captain’s ego, part of the damage to the emotional state of the passengers“.

    Some choices huh?

  57. American_Way
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:56 am | Permalink

    ” fund the Social Security/Medicare train wreck? ”

    Why Max, according the democrats when President Bush brought it up early in his second term – there IS no train wreck……….

  58. American_Way
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:58 am | Permalink

    And Hillary’s comment on taxing BIG OIL is an election year ploy. It sounds great because people are mad at the OIL COMPANIES and they are an easy target. But BIG OIL is not the solution to the mess we are in. Some are too stupid to realize this.

  59. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:06 pm | Permalink

    Bush brought up Social Security reform in his first term. Formed a commission to provide a recommendation and Congress did – Nothing. Not even this perfect Pelosi Congress has done anything – except for doubling the price of oil!

  60. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:08 pm | Permalink

    Just read Hillary’s web site looking for details on her tax increase plan. She keeps crowing, “Just go to my web site, you’ll see my plan there. Just go to my web site…”

    Nuthin.

    No details.

    No wonder Clinton doesn’t discuss ISSUES!

    Going to wash myself now and get Hillary’s webiste slime off of me.

  61. writerdog
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:13 pm | Permalink

    The urge to Nationalize Big Oil is on the emotional level appealing in that because we are so depended on oil for our economy to survive. Many might see it as the only solution to the question of price and availability. But that in and of itself would be a mistake, though it is often used as a excuse more then a valid point. It is a valid point that research and development is a major cost of operation for an oil company.
    Often to offset those cost, there is a dependency on importing oil rather then developing domestic sources.
    Over taxing the profits of big oil is not the answer and would be simply passed on at the pimp. Kind of defeats the purpose huh? It is the same thinking of those that stated by raising the price on a pack of cigarettes would reduce the number of smokers and cause many to reduce their consumption. When all it means is that smokers are paying more for cigarettes.

    Like wise the majority are not really changing their driving habit and are paying the going price for gas.

  62. writerdog
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:18 pm | Permalink

    Max other then totally taking over oil, what can Congress do? I hate to admit it but add one more time I have to agree with Bush. Doing away with the fuel tax for a few months is pointless and political grandstanding. Just what can either the Republicans or Democrats do about oil?

  63. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:19 pm | Permalink

    “Like wise the majority are not really changing their driving habit and are paying the going price for gas.”

    Yup. Even the global warming alarmists are not slowing down or driving any less.

    We should be happy with high prices for energy. It will encourage the conservation that so many global warming environmentalists have been screaming for.

    Ya got what you want! Now stop complaining about gas prices!

    What? You didn’t expect to have to do anything yourselves? You expected someone else to pay the higher price, but not you? You expected someone else to conserve, but not you?

    It is now YOUR TURN to conserve. Time to put YOUR money and action where your mouth is.

  64. WichiWomn
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:21 pm | Permalink

    Ben, I have a question for you. There is a proposal before the city to eliminate grass clippings. What is your opinion of continuing to be able to dispose of clippings as long as they are not bagged? It seems to be that clippings alone would be helpful in breaking down other refuse. Am I wrong?

  65. American_Way
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:22 pm | Permalink

    WriterDog I agree with much of your posts.

    But:

    “When all it means is that smokers are paying more for cigarettes.

    Like wise the majority are not really changing their driving habit and are paying the going price for gas.”

    I see these two as compariable in effect. But the increase to cigarettes is an artifical one not based upon supply and demand. And because the increase is in federal and state taxes (and not an increased cost of manufacturing), the smokers get to fund their governments pet projects. The increases revenue is NOT entirely going to reduce childhood smoking. Whereas, the increased cost for gas is going to all those involved in the oil industry (from station owner, distributor, oil suppliers).

  66. bth
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:27 pm | Permalink

    WW – you do make a point in that if we actually had decent biology going on in a landfill grass clippings might help make stuff rot. However that is not the case. Since we dump so much non-biodegradeble stuff and also toxins they don’t really help.

    Then we run into capacity problems. Why should I be charged the same fee as the guy who dumps 10 times as much?

    What I would like to see is some sort of separate pickup of ‘organic’ material for composting. It might be useful to mix with sewage sludge for land reclamation.

  67. American_Way
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:29 pm | Permalink

    “other then totally taking over oil, what can Congress do?”

    Very little. In fact, their actions on CAFE standards DELAY’s any improvement for decades to come.

    This is going to hurt: But the market is already having an effect. Did you see GM is closing four plants which build SUV’s and big pickups? DEMAND IS DOWN FOR BIG GAS GUZZLERS. Why? Because of higher gas prices.

    This is going to be painful for many years, but the solution is right in front of us. We are addicted to oil. Unless we end the addiction, we will continue to send our dollars overseas to buy oil. The economy will be in shambles. We MUST START BUYING FUEL EFFICIENT VEHICLES. But no one need FORCE us. Nor regulate us.

    Let the price hit $5.00 a gal..

    Sounds cruel, but there isn’t anything government can do or is willing to do to avoid it.

  68. bth
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:29 pm | Permalink

    Max – many of us scientists had already cut down gasoline consumption prior to the price runup.

  69. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:30 pm | Permalink

    I’ve posted several approaches before writerdog.

    We have short-term immediate energy demand issues, and we have long-term energy demand issues. The long-term solutions are not there yet, so we need to buy some time – while developing alternatives.

    SHORT-TERM

    -Drill in Anwar, and Coastal Shelf, in USA.

    -Build more nuke plants.

    -Build new more efficient and cleaner coal plants, and phase-out the older dirtier plants.

    -Increase wind power turbines.

    -Conservation incentives. 50-cent additional gas tax. Gas/Electric surtax with 10% tax on the amount of your monthly utility bill that exceeds $200. Insulation/Home Conservation energy credits.

    -Adding bus service that meets the needs of working people who commute suburbs to town – and back.

    -Truck to Train to Truck plan. Posted this before. We spend billions on Interstate highways used mainly by trucks. Let’s divert some highway money to rails. Truck routes beyond 500 miles should not be necessary. Need high-speed rail, with rapid onload/offload regional hubs.

    Saves: Fuel, Wear/tear on Roads, 7,500 lives killed today in accidents involving trucks, less pollution. Costs less then 1/4 to ship by rail, then by truck. Imagine reducing truck diesel fuel consumption by 75%! Translates to roughly 20% reduction in overall oil consumption in US.

  70. Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:31 pm | Permalink

    OH MY GOSH!

    ReguLiar has been discovered:

    http://www.theonion.com/content/node/78337

  71. writerdog
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:31 pm | Permalink

    exactly, I was thinking the same thing about the other topic about Dole. It does not matter what others are saying or doing it is what the majority of people are doing and saying on an individual level. The same goes for this topic, Gas to high? Drive less, plan to get the maxim done while out and driving this is all nothing new and old replies. In reality there is nothing Government can do to really effect the price of gas. They may stop seeing it as a “cash Cow”, but what real effect would that have on consumption?

  72. StevenEDavis
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:34 pm | Permalink

    “That’s StevenDavis spin on things. WHY do we need that particular item for revenue?”

    Duh, AmWay, we have a 9 Trillion (with a T) dollar debt. Unlike you, I am unwilling to mortage the souls of my grandchildren to the Chinese. I’ll let you do that, but no thank you, I do not want to do that.

    The AMT was cooked up in the late 60’s, or early 70’s so that people had less of a chance to find tax loop holes. Back in the day, $250K/year, was some real money. In the late 60’s that amount was the same as $1 Million a year today.

    If you have to pay that amount, I don’t blame you for pissing and moaning about it. But, even today, people making that amount have it relatively comfortable. Move to some other country if you can’t take that burden – there may be better deals out there, I don’t know.

  73. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:36 pm | Permalink

    Energy Solutions

    LONG-TERM

    -Continue Conservation incentives.

    -Phase out or massively reduce oil/gas/coal/nuclear use

    -Wind to Hyrdogen power – to fuel cars

    -Garbage power (again posted on this before) pilot plants all over, with large plant now being built in Florida. Converts trash to energy, saves environment by reducing land/water pollution.

    -Coastal Wave generators (posted on this before, pilots going on worldwide) along entire US shoreline, 5 miles offshore and out of sight. Cheap and clean and 24/7 power.

    -Solar home development

    -Neighborhood wind developement (1 wind tower shared by neighbors)

    -Geothermal heating/cooling for home and business use

    -Duck tape for politicians used to funnel hot air to power generators. Should be a 100% solution, for many problems.

  74. bth
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:39 pm | Permalink

    Max – I agree with everything you list except the drilling to continue to feed the addiction and also the coal issue due to my science background.

  75. Monkeyhawk
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:40 pm | Permalink

    “writerdog” asks –

    “…other then totally taking over oil, what can Congress do?”

    Lemme float this idea:

    Using hypothetical numbers here, let’s get nostalgic about assume oil is $100 a barrel and Big Oil registers a profit of, say, $10 a barrel. Fine. Groovy. Oil companies can reap billions and billions 10% profit.

    But that’s the problem: the price structure for developing, pumping, transporting, refining, and marketing oil is based on a percentage of oil’s cost; the higher the price of a barrel of oil, the more money for Exxon/Mobil, et al.

    There’s absolutely no incentive for lower oil prices. Just the opposite, it’s to Big Oil’s benefit as the price of crude goes up.

    Why not legislate the amount of profit an oil company can get based on another formula? Ten dollars a barrel. That way there’s no incentive for $120 oil. It doesn’t cost Mobil/Exxon more to refine and market $200 oil. But the windfall that comes with earning a percentage mark-up rather than a per-unit markup is paid for developing alternative energy sources and technologies.

    When (failed oil man) George WMD stole took office office on January 20, 2001, the price of a gallon of gasoline was $1.46. (That was with what? $40-a-barrel crude?) As I recall, Mobil/Exxon wasn’t holding bake sales to keep afloat in 2001. But give them their (now) $10-a-barrel profit.

    At least it would but a check on speculators (of which Big Oil companies are major players).

    Just a thought…

  76. American_Way
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:41 pm | Permalink

    “Amway, Clinton and Obama have no real issues to talk about”

    What I would like to see is a spreadsheet with the candidates positions on the issues for side-by-side comparison.

    Not just the small ones we see in the newspaper from time to time.

    But a excel type document which lists each appropriation budget (i.e. defense, Homeland Security, Dept of Agri.. etc..and include revenue projects) and under those headings each candidates position or the change they would make. The final column would contain the COST. This would be expressed as an amount with a credit indicator (+ or -). The bottom line in the amount column would be the net change from the current year budget position.

    I think all the issues boil down to money. So why not express their position on each item, and the overall impact on the budget resources and deficit?

  77. bth
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:41 pm | Permalink

    Long term – again, much agreement.

  78. writerdog
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:42 pm | Permalink

    LOL what actually brought me to open thread this morning. Since past believes and actions seem more important then actual issues. For those needing more damning guilty by association, The Church of Christ!
    For some time and I have been assured that it no longer follows the believe. BUT they did believe that ONLY those whom are members of the Church of Christ denomination. Would be the only one to go to Heaven! Sad news for all of us whom are Baptist, Jewish, Moslem, Catholic, you name it and we are damn to Hell. Wright’s Church and by association Obama are Church of Christ.

  79. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:44 pm | Permalink

    bth,

    The oil/coal use would be short-term solutions for only the next 20 years or so.

    We need to buy the time to develop the alternative long-term solutions. We will shut-down the American economy completely if we don’t have an interim solution.

    Look at the sticker shock and complaining that we experience now with gas at $3.50/gal and food going up. Double or tripple that effect and you will see worldwide economic depression.

    We need an interim solution to avoid that.

  80. gster
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:46 pm | Permalink

    I often wonder, and maybe fear, that the truly well qualified and needed people of either party refuse to have their names associated with the stench of today’s politics. Todays crop are sadly lacking.

  81. American_Way
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:47 pm | Permalink

    “Move to some other country if you can’t take that burden – there may be better deals out there, I don’t know.”

    You know Steven, I say the same thing about the lower 50%. Stop the EIC.

    It’s easy for you to say: TAX THAT OTHER GUY HE IS RICH!

    But much harder for you to sacrifice yourself.

    At least I asked you to find things to cut – to avoid taking the simpleton route of just taxing the rich more. (and if you read: They don’t have enough money if you took it ALL, to pay off the 9 trillion you throw around).

  82. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:49 pm | Permalink

    gster,

    Why would the truly qualified put themselves thru the abuse of the papparazzi press today? The best and brightest are doing very well for themselves.

    Why should The People who take little responsibility for themselves, expect someone else to take on that burden?

  83. American_Way
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:51 pm | Permalink

    Max, I almost had a heart attack when I read one of YOUR lines:

    “Conservation incentives. 50-cent additional gas tax. Gas/Electric surtax with 10% tax on the amount of your monthly utility bill that exceeds $200.”

    What happens to the revenue?

    -”Adding bus service that meets the needs of working people who commute suburbs to town – and back.”

    No one rides the bus. Maybe, maybe if gas hits $5.00 a gallon. Plus. I like trains. Just like Japan. Too expensive now to build with right-of-way costs. But the bus sucks. I’m a type A. Cannot handle the stress of all the stops……

  84. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:53 pm | Permalink

    AmWay, if all the working people left, Steven and his kind would actually have to take on responsibility for themselves – for the first time.

    The Libs don’t really want to encourage the successful working people to leave the country. Though it is tempting. I know where there’s some beautiful cheap land in Canada, Panama, and Eastern Europe.

  85. Monkeyhawk
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:56 pm | Permalink

    “MaxGrobnik” proposes –

    – “… Gas/Electric surtax with 10% tax on the amount of your monthly utility bill that exceeds $200. Insulation/Home Conservation energy credits….”

    Hmmm.

    Sounds like typical leftist liberal commie pinko socialist Democrat tax-the-rich policy to me, “MaxGrobnik.”

    I have a big house. It’s insulated to within an inch of its life, I have heating and air conditioning units with absolutely the highest efficiency rating available (when I bought ‘em, anyway. But it’s a big house. I can’t remember a utility bill under $200 in, like, forever. But you “MaxGrobnik” want to surtax me 10%. You, “MaxGrobnik” want to (how is it you guys put it?) steal money from my pocket simply because I have a big house.

    You damned leftist liberal commie pinko socialist, you.

  86. annie_moose
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:58 pm | Permalink

    I never could understand these personal liberty types complaining about the sin taxes when you can grow it or make it yourself. Save money better quality, sense of accomplishment.

    http://www.beer-brewing.com/

    http://tobaccotalk.itgo.com/

  87. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 12:58 pm | Permalink

    AmWay, the additional tax revenue would be used to pay for the tax incentives which would be used to encourage the short and long-term solutions I listed above.

    The bus service, I agree no one uses those today. But if we had true bus service for working people to and from suburbs running every 15 minutes during morning and evening rush hours, people would use them, especially if gas is $5/gal.

    Costs me $7 a day just in gas right now at $3+/gal.

    Our bus service today is geared toward inner cities, welfare routes, on-call service – in other words for non-working people.

    It’s our tax money, we can change the bus service provided. Divert those inner city routes to the morning/evening rush hours for working people, and use the same existing resources in a more efficient manner.

  88. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 1:00 pm | Permalink

    Yeah Monkeyman, you want to encourage conservation – as long as somebody ELSE pays for it!

  89. Predestined
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 1:01 pm | Permalink

    AmWay,

    Why do the filthy rich need more? How many houses, cars, jewels, etc. do they need? They have no reason to complain about the price of gas or food. They can buy pretty much whateer they want…except a ticket to heaven.

    Compare to those on the lower end of the tax bracket. Sometimes through no fault of their own, the opposite is true of them.

    I also think Jesus would disagree wtih you. If you think he got po’d in the temple, just think what he’d think of the greedy rich.

  90. Nathaniel
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 1:04 pm | Permalink

    Ben,

    The Trinity “concept” coincided with their being only one God. It’s doesn’t go against it.

    If you actually grasped the concept then there is no contradiction in Christ being the Savior with the verse given by regular to start this thread.

  91. Nathaniel
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 1:07 pm | Permalink

    Mary,

    Just as much, if not more, death and destruction can be attributed to Atheism, Secular Humanism or the like.

    Religion is not the problem. Evil people are the problem.

    If not religion they will use WHATEVER they can to gain more power.

  92. bth
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 1:08 pm | Permalink

    Nathan – I understand that. I was simply noting that there are those who are at least as qualified as you who disagree with your position on the Trinity. Remember, I also grew up with the Trinity concept.

  93. American_Way
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    “I can’t remember a utility bill under $200 in, like, forever. But you “MaxGrobnik” want to surtax me 10%. You, “MaxGrobnik” want to (how is it you guys put it?) steal money from my pocket simply because I have a big house.”

    Why Monkeyhawk: You sound just like a rich man!!!!

  94. American_Way
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 1:12 pm | Permalink

    Predestined
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 1:01 pm | Permalink
    AmWay,

    Why do the filthy rich need more?

    Read slowly: BECAUSE IT IS NOT YOUR MONEY!!!!
    WHO THE HELL ARE YOU TO TELL PEOPLE HOW MUCH THEY ARE ENTITLED TO AND TO CALL THEM “FILTHY” FOR MAKING IT!?!?!

    ” also think Jesus would disagree wtih you.”

    JESUS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS. IN FACT, HE COULDN’T GIVE A RAT’S ASS ABOUT THIS. THAT AIN’T WHAT HE IS ABOUT….Besides, I tithe my 10%. THE BIG GUY NEVER ASKED ME FOR MORE!

  95. American_Way
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 1:14 pm | Permalink

    “I was simply noting that there are those who are at least as qualified as you who disagree with your position on the Trinity. Remember, I also grew up with the Trinity concept.”

    Sounds like me.

  96. Grateful_Dave
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 1:17 pm | Permalink

    WTF??????????

    Disneyland-Style Theme Park Set for Baghdad. Honest to God

    [Llewellyn] Werner, chairman of C3, a Los Angeles-based holding company for private equity firms, is pouring millions of dollars into developing the Baghdad Zoo and Entertainment Experience, a massive American-style amusement park that will feature a skateboard park, rides, a concert theatre and a museum. It is being designed by the firm that developed Disneyland. “The people need this kind of positive influence. It’s going to have a huge psychological impact,” Mr Werner said.
    The 50-acre (20 hectare) swath of land sits adjacent to the Green Zone and encompasses Baghdad’s existing zoo, which was looted, left without power and abandoned after the American-led invasion in 2003…

    Mr Werner, who has been sold a 50-year lease on the site by the Mayor of Baghdad for an undisclosed sum, says that the time is ripe for the amusement park. “I think people will embrace it. They’ll see it as an opportunity for their children regardless if they’re Shia or Sunni. They’ll say their kids deserve a place to play and they’ll leave it alone.”

    The project will cost $500 million (£250 million) and will be managed by Iraqis. Under the terms of the lease, Mr Werner will retain exclusive rights to housing and hotel developments, which he says will be both culturally sensitive and enormously profitable. “I wouldn’t be doing this if I wasn’t making money,” he said. “I also have this wonderful sense that we’re doing the right thing – we’re going to employ thousands of Iraqis. But mostly everything here is for profit.”
    A $1 million skateboard park, the first phase of the development, will open in July.

  97. Posted April 29, 2008 at 1:22 pm | Permalink

    Re Predestined’s 1:01 post…

    Here here and amen!

  98. WichiWomn
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 1:28 pm | Permalink

    Ben, Understood. We really NEED a recycling program to reduce the waste going into the landfill. We now take our recyclables to the bins at Leekers. I also agree about the usage fees. Many times I have only one or two bags of trash in the dumpster, and my b/f argues why even take it to the street? I don’t have much to throw away in the winter, however not being able to get rid of some yard waste is going to be a burden for me. I have 35 trees and one acre. I burn most of the tree limbs in the fireplace and already have a huge compost pile even though I use it in the garden. I have more yard waste than I can use, so I hate to see not having some sort of outlet.
    What’s depressing is the poll the WE has where 37% say they’ll dump wherever they can find a spot.

  99. American_Way
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    “Compare to those on the lower end of the tax bracket. Sometimes through no fault of their own, the opposite is true of them.”

    So BECAUSE it isn’t their FAULT, that gives you a right to steal more money from those who are “filthy” rich?

    Because you are poor, you have a right to MY MONEY?

    Where the H is that written? (Other than by Karl Marx)

  100. American_Way
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 1:39 pm | Permalink

    Upon review, I see I have let the HAVE NOT’s demanding more of other peoples money get to me.

    I let the beggars with a hand stretched out full of nothing and a mouth full of “gimmee” affect my self discipline and control.

    In short I let you make me mad. Sorry for the caps.

    Going to chill out.

  101. Posted April 29, 2008 at 1:41 pm | Permalink

    I’ll see ya at the water place ben.

    Wichi?

    Mulch your grass clippings back into the yard. A mower is also good at making fallen leaves go back to the Earth.

  102. Posted April 29, 2008 at 1:47 pm | Permalink

    Best place for this I guess.

    Obama has done about the only thing he could do.

    He has announced that he is shocked and hurt and feels betrayed and used by his pastor. Well he’s got a right to be. I’m not for Obama but I felt bad he was the victim of his egomaniac and probably racist pastor.

    Randy Schofield Obama damage control thread in

    3

    2

    1

  103. Phantom
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 1:55 pm | Permalink

    Anyone know if that soil they sell at the landfill is good for anything, say a garden? I figure it’d have a lot of good stuff in it, but would be concerned with all the chemicals that would probably also be there.

  104. WichiWomn
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

    Blue Jay,
    I am using a mulch blade now but the leaves of 35 trees is a bit too much mulch for the yard. Too much will kill the little grass I have convinced to grow. And in some places I just let the leaves stay.

  105. Posted April 29, 2008 at 2:24 pm | Permalink

    Yeah that’s a lot of trees and the attendant leaves ok.

    I join your call. There should be distributed public collection places for yard recycling material. Maybe in the parks?

    And here is another chance among interested folks to plug the ProKs Miller recycling center.

    Did you know you can recycle almost everything there? After visiting there, I am throwing almost nothing away.

  106. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 2:29 pm | Permalink

    “Compare to those on the lower end of the tax bracket. Sometimes through no fault of their own, the opposite is true of them.”

    What if it IS their fault they are in the lower end of the tax backet, do they still get handouts? And who decides whether it is their fault or not?

    Maybe it’s not the rich man’s fault that he is rich either! Maybe it’s not the rich man’s fault that there are poor people, so is it still OK to punish the rich man to reward the poor?

    (Ah, but the Libs have to have someone to blame, other then themselves!)

    I get really confused by these Socialists who want to steal money from one group of people and give to another group of people. How do they decide how much to steal from who? And how do they decide how much to give to whoever?

    And who is “they”? The elitist ones in Government are so smart. I wonder why we still have poverty 50 years after LBJ launched the war on poverty.

  107. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 2:31 pm | Permalink

    And the Monkey complains about a 10% Conservation Tax on the portion of the untility bill above $200!

    Poor guy.

    If his utility bill was $300, he’d pay a whopping $10 Conservation Tax on the excessive energy he used.

    He’s rich enough to afford that.

  108. ksgrm
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 2:32 pm | Permalink

    We mulch everything also but it will be a problem in our neighborhood because we see several people who bag grass clippings every week. We see some that dump them in the street and let them wash down the storm sewers.

    We had a neighborhood meeting last night to address the problem of grass clippings. We are going to try to have a central dumping point with an approved container for compost. There are more things to worry about than I realized such as being combustable.

    Anyone with any good ideas we would welcome.

  109. JMWalker
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    #
    MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 2:29 pm | Permalink

    “Compare to those on the lower end of the tax bracket. Sometimes through no fault of their own, the opposite is true of them.”

    What if it IS their fault they are in the lower end of the tax backet, do they still get handouts? And who decides whether it is their fault or not?

    Maybe it’s not the rich man’s fault that he is rich either! Maybe it’s not the rich man’s fault that there are poor people, so is it still OK to punish the rich man to reward the poor?

    (Ah, but the Libs have to have someone to blame, other then themselves!)

    I get really confused by these Socialists who want to steal money from one group of people and give to another group of people. How do they decide how much to steal from who? And how do they decide how much to give to whoever?

    And who is “they”? The elitist ones in Government are so smart. I wonder why we still have poverty 50 years after LBJ launched the war on poverty.
    =================================================

    Man, I’ve read everything now. I don’t have to look any further for enlightenment anymore: Max has it all right there in his itty-bitty mind. How dare us Liberals think we can help people in need. Why, the very thought of it must put Max and his merry band of Neocon nitwits would rather have em just lined up and shot. After all, if they’re poor, they must be both stupid and lazy, so what does the world need with people like that?

    Never mind their jobs may now be overseas, or a market took a turn for the worse, forcing massive layoffs, Max and his merry band of Neocon nitwits has just the answer for them.

    Yep, birth em, throw em out in the cold, and let em fend for themselves: the Neocon creed.

    Way to go, Max, you are indeed a credit to fools everywhere.

  110. SolDevVB
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 2:44 pm | Permalink

    ” How dare us Liberals think we can help people in need”

    Be my guest. Why do you have to steal to do it? If liberals are so looking out for the little guy or down on his luck guy, why don’t y’all finace them out of your own pocket? Why do you have to steal from someone else’s pocket to get your warm fuzzy?

  111. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 2:52 pm | Permalink

    “How dare us Liberals think we can help people in need.”

    JM, who the hell is “WE”?

    How dare YOU take from ME to give to YOURSELF! Another do-gooder liberal, willing to help out as long as he doesn’t have to pay for it himself!

  112. Regular
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 2:53 pm | Permalink

    Grass Clippings

    * Mow regularly

    * 1/3 rule – If grass is three inches long, mow off the top 1/3

    * For taller grass that leaves clippings, rake up and spread across yard right before next mowing, so it can be mulched in with other clippings

  113. LLTVET
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    You go too far Walker: I am no card carrying bleeding heart by any stretch of the imagination. But paying taxes is not a punishment. It is a responsibility. Your taxes paid for my salary when I was in the Army. So let’s realize that you are not stating some absolute axiom here. Taxes and spending should be lower than they once were so that there is no abuse of the system. All agree on that. Now if your going to invoke the spirit of stealing tax dollars and abuse. I think you should also explain the pathetic accountability of Haliburton. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. (Deja Vu)

  114. LLTVET
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 3:08 pm | Permalink

    Oops, sorry walker. I misread. That was for Max.

  115. bth
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

    Agreed regular – to which I add occassionally harvest the grass if it is long enough to use as a soil amendment in the gardens.

  116. bth
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 3:12 pm | Permalink

    and …

    In the summer, when it is so blazing hot, it is SO much easier to just mow it down and not have to deal with the bags and all that. The returned clippings help the lawn survive the heat/dry of summer.

  117. JMWalker
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 3:14 pm | Permalink

    #
    MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 2:52 pm | Permalink

    “How dare us Liberals think we can help people in need.”

    JM, who the hell is “WE”?

    How dare YOU take from ME to give to YOURSELF! Another do-gooder liberal, willing to help out as long as he doesn’t have to pay for it himself!
    ==================================================

    Max, you’re the moron that would bypass a dying man in the street because it might cost you something.

    And “WE” does not refer to you: you don’t belong.

  118. JMWalker
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 3:22 pm | Permalink

    #
    SolDevVB
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 2:44 pm | Permalink

    ” How dare us Liberals think we can help people in need”

    Be my guest. Why do you have to steal to do it? If liberals are so looking out for the little guy or down on his luck guy, why don’t y’all finace them out of your own pocket? Why do you have to steal from someone else’s pocket to get your warm fuzzy?
    ===============================================
    But we do, sol. It’s called charity. Obviously you haven’t heard of it. And when charity falls short, as it sometimes does, as in Katrina, then the government is called upon to help. I won’t ask you to understand, as the box you Neocons live in is fully insulated from the real world, but sometimes public funds are needed for something other than floating big business, and waging a war in some tin-pot country (Iraq) in the name of terrorism. How many billions spent on killing people? How many billions NOT spent on saving them.

  119. SolDevVB
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    Didn’t figure you knew what charity was as you assumed the government should provide all to all. And maybe the ‘help’ should fall short. Maybe it should just miss covering those it is given to. Maybe they should have to reach a little further and help themselves.

    But I wouldn’t expect you to understand that. Since you feel the government should pay for everything. Pay for it with the money of the successful.

    You wonder why companies are outsourcing and moving overseas? You want to know why the Cayman Islands ‘host’ so many businesses. T A X E S. But go right ahead and raise taxes some more, disproportionately. Watch how many more people move their money out of the country. What then?

  120. Regular
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 3:38 pm | Permalink

    Hey J M Walker, how many of those first church of atheism organized and went down to New Orleans to help?

    We all know that those Atheists just line up at home less shelters to pitch in right?

    Ask Kansas Sam about that. You know all those do-gooder Progressive, constantly whining Liberals pitch in and help him out with the homeless.

    Maybe a Liberal Hollywood actor or two? You know who will whine about charity, then spend two million dollars on a wedding or build their lavish underground boogie studio which they invite their drug taking friends.

    :)

  121. SolDevVB
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 3:40 pm | Permalink

    And throwing Katrina in there? An absolute and utter failure on the LOCAL government. That would be a liberal government mind you. They totally fail their people and you blame the rich for not giving more. The taxes should have been higher.

    How about you look at the beginning of the problem first? They had no effective plan. The plan they had was not carried out. Then the stood and looked at Washington. Yeah, let’s all give the idiot mayor and governor a free pass. Let’s pass all the blame on to FEMA.

  122. Posted April 29, 2008 at 3:42 pm | Permalink

    “Hey J M Walker, how many of those first church of atheism organized and went down to New Orleans to help?”

    Atheism is the only thing rebuilding homes. Unless you can show me and example of divine intervention or a house spontaneously building itself as a result of prayer then all the work is being done by hands working, not hands praying.

  123. Nathaniel
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 3:50 pm | Permalink

    Maggot,

    Atheism is a worldview. It could hardly be described as what is rebuilding homes.

    A better question is to ask, who do you think sent more aid, people, and money to help?

    Atheist groups or Religous one?

    What is it in an Athiest world view which calls upon others to be compassionate and who sets those standards? Who says what is right and wrong by Athiesm standards?

  124. Posted April 29, 2008 at 3:54 pm | Permalink

    “Hey J M Walker, how many of those first church of atheism organized and went down to New Orleans to help?”

    He’s right, Mr. Walker. Why J M went down to Mississippi to help and never came back.

    A good Christian man, he is, Mr. Walker.

    He went down to Mississippi and never returned.

  125. Posted April 29, 2008 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    And what is that Atheist world view Nathan? Extending a lack of belief in deities to anything else is pure hyperbole on your part.

    According to the Christian authority Hagee your gods inflicted the disaster upon Mississippi, Louisiana and Alabama as a result of a parade in New Orleans. So it looks like religion is to blame. And now humans, without god, must go in and repair the damage.

    So how many gods are repairing homes and how many gods buried the dead who cried out to non-existent gods for help before the water filled their lungs?

  126. outlander
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 4:09 pm | Permalink

    Hagee speaks only for those Christians who allow him to. I don’t think his comments on Katrina were theologically sound. Just his opinion.

    But really Maggot, “Atheism is the only thing rebuilding homes”?????

  127. Nathaniel
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    Maggot,

    If you don’t know what a world view is, how Athiesm is one, or what the world view of Athiesm basically says, then perhaps you shouldn’t be in this discussion.

  128. Regular
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 4:22 pm | Permalink

    Who to blame the rising oil prices on?
    Fox News

    Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., laid blame of rising gas prices at the feet of Democrats, speaking with reporters.

    “The top issue in the country these days is the price of gas at the pump. It’s gone up $1.25 since the Democrats took over the Congress. Gasoline today at the pump is $1.25 more, on average, than it was when the Democrats took over Congress.

    Why is that a good place to measure? Because during that period, we’ve had an opportunity to build more refineries, and the Democratic majority voted it down. … On the production side of the equation, this new majority is not interested in doing anything,” McConnell said.

  129. Political_mama
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 4:30 pm | Permalink

    Nice switch play there Con. The dems will vote down anything that allows the big oil companies to beg for more corporate welfare and enormous profits…which is what I expect them to do. I also expect dems to vote FOR renewable energy development on a large scale…something the republicans will vote against.

  130. ksgrm
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 4:35 pm | Permalink

    Maggotpunk
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 4:00 pm | Permalink
    And what is that Atheist world view Nathan? Extending a lack of belief in deities to anything else is pure hyperbole on your part.

    According to the Christian authority Hagee your gods inflicted the disaster upon Mississippi, Louisiana and Alabama as a result of a parade in New Orleans. So it looks like religion is to blame. And now humans, without god, must go in and repair the damage.

    ———————————-

    Maggot where were you when many churches did do just that. My son and 15 men from his church in Colorado Springs, rented a truck at there own expense, loaded it with all of the tools they had, took a month of accrued vacations from their jobs and worked in the NO area for over a month. Stripping houses from the outside walls in. Removing trees that were on top of houses, cleaning up stuff most of us would gag just being around. Where were you and the other athesists?

    Their God was there with them and all of the other workers from churches all over the US. They bunked in church basements, slept on the floor and ate Red Cross food.

    You guys need to find another mantra this one is tired.

  131. Monkeyhawk
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 4:44 pm | Permalink

    That pinko-commie-liberal-leftist-socialist “MaxGrobnik” whines –

    “..the Monkey complains about a 10% Conservation Tax on the portion of the untility bill above $200!

    Poor guy.

    If his utility bill was $300, he’d pay a whopping $10 Conservation Tax on the excessive energy he used.

    He’s rich enough to afford that.”

    Ah! Now it’s okay to tax the rich?

  132. bth
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 4:47 pm | Permalink

    Nathan – there is no such thing as the “world view” of atheism. Each atheist has his or her own view of things. That is the whole point – there IS no heirarchy.

    You might be able to claim to speak for Christians but you certainly cannot speak for atheists.

  133. Nathaniel
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 4:51 pm | Permalink

    Ben,

    There are varying degrees of an individuals world view, but they have one.

    Atheism is a world view. Each individual can and does have a variation within it, but the ultimate definition of what makes someone an Athiest is what also gives them that foundation for their world view.

    This is basic philosophy stuff here.

  134. bth
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 4:55 pm | Permalink

    Nathan – I know a number of atheists – their views vary all over the place. I also know Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists – and again I cannot define a ‘world view’ to which they adhere.

    Perhaps it is just a bit beyond basic.

  135. Posted April 29, 2008 at 4:56 pm | Permalink

    Regular
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 2:53 pm | Permalink
    Grass Clippings

    * Mow regularly

    * 1/3 rule – If grass is three inches long, mow off the top 1/3

    * For taller grass that leaves clippings, rake up and spread across yard right before next mowing, so it can be mulched in with other clippings

    ******

    This guy is lecturing us on how to mow and he doesn’t even have an effing yard.

    Typical.

  136. Political_mama
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 4:57 pm | Permalink

    My neighbor told me to mow really really slow and it would mulch the grass on its own. And he had one of the most beautiful lawns in the whole neighborhood.

  137. Nathaniel
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 4:58 pm | Permalink

    Ben,

    You obviously don’t understand what a world view is then.

    If you are an Athiest, you deny the existence of a God. Everything else you see in the world would then reject anything from God.

    That is about as basic as I can get.

    As I said, Athiesm would be a large foundation from which many of your ideas, thoughts, and the way you see things come from.

    Hence, why it is called a world view.

  138. bth
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 5:01 pm | Permalink

    No nathan – it is you who obviously doesn’t have a clue about anyone’s beliefs other than your own. Your ignorance is exceeded only by your know-it-all arrogance.

    Gee, you are the world’s expert at philosophy, science, literature, …

    Anything you are NOT an expert at?

  139. Posted April 29, 2008 at 5:10 pm | Permalink

    “World view”

    http://www.thefreedictionary.com/worldview

  140. Nathaniel
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    Ben,

    This has nothing to do with my beliefs. It has to do with understanding what a world view is.

    Either you have something constructive to add to the conversation or you don’t.

    Looks like all you are left with is the name calling and personal attacks.

    You could be a bit more graceful with admitting you are wrong, but I have not come to expect much from you liberals.

  141. Posted April 29, 2008 at 5:23 pm | Permalink

    Atheism >>>>

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism

  142. Nathaniel
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 5:27 pm | Permalink

    Thank you Chas, I was actually about to post that link myself.

    “Western atheism has its roots in pre-Socratic Greek philosophy, but did not emerge as a distinct world-view until the late Enlightenment.”

    How dare they call atheism a world view!

  143. Monkeyhawk
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 5:40 pm | Permalink

    “bth” asked “Nathan” –

    “Anything you are NOT an expert at?”

    Grammar, for one thing.

  144. Posted April 29, 2008 at 5:44 pm | Permalink

    “Maggot where were you when many churches did do just that. My son and 15 men from his church in Colorado Springs, rented a truck at there own expense, loaded it with all of the tools they had, took a month of accrued vacations from their jobs and worked in the NO area for over a month. Stripping houses from the outside walls in. Removing trees that were on top of houses, cleaning up stuff most of us would gag just being around. Where were you and the other athesists?”

    How does all your wealth and free time reflect on my Atheism?

    I planted some trees last week, where were you and your church?

  145. Posted April 29, 2008 at 5:49 pm | Permalink

    Atheism is pretty simple. One guy says he believes in a deity, the other guy says he doesn’t. The guy who says he doesn’t is an Atheist. Now how is that a world view?

    That’s like saying not believing in unicorns is a world view. Sure the Bible says unicorns are real so I better use a different example, dragons, satyrs, avian bats, four legged beetles, hmmmm. Okay, little green men living on Mars. Not believing that is a world view apparently, so Nathan, enlighten me on how that is a world view.

  146. Nathaniel
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 6:00 pm | Permalink

    Maggot,

    I already explained it in my simple terms. Chas has provided several links.

    Read them. Learn something.

  147. Posted April 29, 2008 at 6:02 pm | Permalink

    C’mon Nathan, how does not believing in little green men on Mars form a world view? It’s your silly claim, I’d just like to understand. Chas presented something which completely refutes your claim. Since yours makes absolutely no sense I’m just wanting you to clarify and use the green men example.

  148. ksgrm
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 6:03 pm | Permalink

    Maggot you were the one putting down Christian. Why don’t you own your own argument instead of changing the subject. I leave my faith out of my posts because that is my personal faith. But when you attack it knowing how many on here believe then you don’t have immunity from being calling on your posts.

    And for the love of Pete how does my free time and wealth or lack thereof have to do with this argument or anything else?

    My son isn’t rich but he gave of what he had including vacation time he then was not able to spend with his family. What does that have to do with your stupid post?

  149. Posted April 29, 2008 at 6:05 pm | Permalink

    According to some Atheist links, Nathan is also an atheist. Nathan doesnt believe in the God Ba’al, or Odin, or Zeus, or Ra!! That means for THOSE Gods, Nathan is an Atheist. As are MANY —

  150. Nathaniel
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 6:06 pm | Permalink

    Maggot,

    I already explained it. If you disagree with my explanation then lay out your argument.

    Chas didn’t do anything besides post links.

    And if you read the link to the wiki page it clearly says that Atheism is a world view. Even goes through it’s history.

    It is not my silly claim. It is a sound Philisophical idea held by what I thought to be just about everyone.

    I guess I was wrong.

  151. Nathaniel
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 6:09 pm | Permalink

    Yes Chas, if you selectively define the word and meaning then you could say that.

    Figuring that Atheism is defined in the most generic way of rejecting belief in any/all dieties, I am not one.

  152. Posted April 29, 2008 at 6:10 pm | Permalink

    ksgrm whines:
    “Maggot you were the one putting down Christian.”

    Funny thing about your reading comprehension because I wasn’t being specific about Christianity apart from mentioning Hagee. Nice to know that you associate that racist, hate-filled bigot with representing Christianity. Oh well, looks like you insulted yourself.

    BTW, you changed the subject. My views don’t have anything to do with some nutters in Colorado with a lot of time and money on their hands.

  153. DavidB
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 6:14 pm | Permalink

    God made me an athiest… I can’t help it! It was His will….

  154. Posted April 29, 2008 at 6:15 pm | Permalink

    Nathan dodges:
    “I already explained it. If you disagree with my explanation then lay out your argument.”

    What argument? I have yet to hear what my world view is concerning little green men from Mars.

    Is my rejection of Krishna somehow influencing what coffee I choose to buy? I don’t think so but that’s your claim and your entire point is that you said it therefore it must be true. But you really haven’t said anything.

    I don’t eat beef, it must have something to do with my rejection of Vishnu. Nathan eats beef because he believes in Vishnu although Hinduism forbids the eating of beef. How do you figure that one?

  155. Nathaniel
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 6:19 pm | Permalink

    Maggot,

    I made a very simple explanation to ben. Read upthread.

    Read the link.

    Better yet, learn some philosophy.

    Then come back and we will have a discussion.

  156. Posted April 29, 2008 at 6:24 pm | Permalink

    Hehe, Nathan is trying to tell me to read up on philosophy. Tell me wise one, how many college philosophy courses did you take or did you just grab some stuff off wikipedia and consider yourself a philosopher?

    Since you are such a great philosopher then answering the question should be no problem for you. Yet, you continue to dodge. I looked up your comments to Ben, you never even defined world view or said what the Atheist world view is and how it’s supposed to relate to the subject. Your entire philosophical treatise is that you said it, and that’s it.

    Well I gotta run off for a couple of hours (political stuff you know) so I’m sure when I get back I’ll read nothing substantial from you.

  157. Posted April 29, 2008 at 6:43 pm | Permalink

    Nathan, you might actually post your idea of what a “worldview” means in your opinion… That gives you and Maggot, and the others a starting point…

  158. Regular
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 6:58 pm | Permalink

    #
    CapnAmerica
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 4:56 pm | Permalink

    Regular
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 2:53 pm | Permalink
    Grass Clippings

    * Mow regularly

    * 1/3 rule – If grass is three inches long, mow off the top 1/3

    * For taller grass that leaves clippings, rake up and spread across yard right before next mowing, so it can be mulched in with other clippings

    ******

    This guy is lecturing us on how to mow and he doesn’t even have an effing yard.

    Typical.
    —————
    Drop on by next week Capn.

    You can mow the back of my “no yard”

  159. HerbertWestIII
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 7:19 pm | Permalink

    Just a reminder, the Legislatures will be out of this years session this week. The KPTS8, “Ask Your Legislatures” will air this May 4th for the last time this year. If you have any issues, like Bill 1125 on citizens be allowed to have Uzi’s, Silencers and Sawed Off Shotguns, complain now. If we dont, as of July 1st the citizens of Kansas will be able to own “Fire Power” above the Service Equipment Law Enforcement Carries and uses. When you call 911, the Troopers, Deputies, and Cops are will show up where citizens doing stupid stuff can out gun them. Choose well and please consider calling and expressing your opinion while we still have a say so this year. Lets stop the advancement of Trooper 11’s fate. 10 Troopers have fallen in the Line of Duty in Kansas, in its History. I dont want to sit back and see Trooper 11 come around. Please express your views to your Representatives and Senators. “Cops dont shoot Cops, Citizens do”. Herbert West III west.herb@yahoo.com

  160. HerbertWestIII
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 7:48 pm | Permalink

    Hey again, I have found in my 41 years that if I tell someone they are wrong they go on the defensive. They tend to respond in a fashion that may not even be their normal responce. So here goes, “what does the public NEED all these gun changes for”?? What would the general public do with an UZI? A Sawed Off Shotgun? A silencer? How do they currently handle their problems, without these things? Why cant they continue to handle their problems in life, as they currently do? Plain and simple, what would these people use these items for? Please name a situation where these items are needed, based on what the items are. Please explain what you feel these items are. They are not TOYS! What would you do with these items? I am just curious. Herbert West III west.herb@yahoo.com

  161. LR2
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 9:08 pm | Permalink

    Good show on PBS now — “Carriers” about a Navy Carrier group in the gulf —- seems pretty balanced. Sailors comments on both sides of the why are we here issue —– but a good display of what carrier life is kind of like (ya gotta be there to know)

  162. Posted April 29, 2008 at 9:51 pm | Permalink

    Well, we shall see if Obama can pull himself together the rest of this week. I think he can. He has the poise, and the savvy to keep his head above water!

  163. Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:02 pm | Permalink

    Nathaniel
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 6:09 pm | Permalink
    Yes Chas, if you selectively define the word and meaning then you could say that.

    Figuring that Atheism is defined in the most generic way of rejecting belief in any/all dieties, I am not one.
    =====================

    Nathan, I think you got those two reversed. If you selectively define the word and meaning, you define it as rejecting belief in any/all deities.

    However, if you define it in the most generic way possible, then most everybody is an Atheist, for they dont believe in a lot of other gods/goddesses that others believe in, thus making most everybody an atheist, except for the one who defines it as rejecting belief in any/all deities! LOL“

  164. Political_mama
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:03 pm | Permalink

    I had to share something bizarre that happened to me today. I was taking care of my client, and went to make coffee, opened the cabinet and closed it…and a large decorative ceramic charger that was propped up on top of the cabinet came crashing down on my head. I didn’t slam the cabinet or anything. It hit me so hard, I literally saw stars. Then after hitting my head, it smashed into the countertop actually gouging the surface.

    Well, I was just so impressed that my head wasn’t bleeding. I just reached up and dug a chunk of the plate out of my head! Now its bleeding. Death by ceramics?

    HA.

  165. Political_mama
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:04 pm | Permalink

    Does that make me a pot head?

  166. Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:08 pm | Permalink

    Ummmm I think maybe a dish head, not a pot head, or jar head LOL good for you that you are not hurt very bad

  167. Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:09 pm | Permalink

    Interviewing 7 new clients tomorrow. need to get some sleep tonite. dont like 7 interviews in one day. makes me a zombie afterwards!

    nite PMama!

  168. parkay
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:34 pm | Permalink

    Barack Hussein Obamanation restated on a nationwide TV news broadcast Sunday his adamant continued support for the heinous partial birth abortions now banned in federal law, implying his obvious intent to drive the overturning of all such pro-life restrictions on abortions, especially late-term and post-viable abortions, aiming eventually for taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand.
    - – -

    Perverted Princeton professor Pete Singer, who actually advocates legalized infanticide, in some cases mandatory execution of disabled newborns, will collect $20 thousand for speaking on “conscientious food choices” at Arizona State University.
    Why isn’t this man in prison for inciting heinous crimes?
    - – -

    Eric Paul Henry, 30, was convicted Friday in Milwaukee County, WI Circuit Court of first-degree intentional homicide, for tying up his grandmother Anne Gordon, 75, an ordained minister, and taping a plastic bag over her head, after she refused to give him money for his girlfriend to commit an abortion. Mr. Henry faces a life sentence on June 19.

  169. Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:43 pm | Permalink

    Hi parkay.

    Care for a little give and take?

    It can only lend you a smidgen of credibility.

    Or you as ever spew and through?

  170. ANTI
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:49 pm | Permalink

    BlueJay, Your link in your nic goes nowhere. Just thought you should know.

  171. Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:52 pm | Permalink

    ANTI – Is that somehow important?

  172. Political_mama
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:53 pm | Permalink

    No Troy Newman can’t participate in actual discussion because he knows he lies and will get beaten down so bad that it would make him look worse than he already does.

    Let me guess, mandatory extermination of disabled newborns…meaning those who have no hope of living anyway? I think Newman should be forced to sit with a suffering person…I mean a really suffering person just waiting to die.

  173. ANTI
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:55 pm | Permalink

    No, it is not important. I thought perhaps BlueJay had the link for a purpose and should know that it doesn’t work. That is all Chas, no malice.

  174. Political_mama
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:55 pm | Permalink

    By the way, again, proves how desperate some people are for abortions…and that could have been prevented had some help been available for her to obtain an abortion.

  175. Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:57 pm | Permalink

    There is no link in my nic.

    Not unless wordpress put it there.

  176. ANTI
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 10:59 pm | Permalink

    BlueJay, click on your nic to see the address.

  177. BlueJay
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:01 pm | Permalink

    Ah I see.

    I do not know how that happened. I think I just stopped it.

    The offer many times posted stands Parkay.

    Bring your issue to debate. We grow tired of your scrawling on our blog and declining to stick your fight.

  178. ANTI
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:01 pm | Permalink

    BlueJay, it goes to this:

    http://andalsoshacklingthemtoanentitlementmentality/

  179. ANTI
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:02 pm | Permalink

    Ok, I didn’t know if it was a mistake on your part. Thanks for the clarification.

  180. Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:06 pm | Permalink

    Ummmm – ANTI – I am not Chas, or are you wanting to start a problem where none now exists? You are being very stupid to continue in this charade of idiocy!

  181. BlueJay
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:06 pm | Permalink

    It would seem a cut and paste I did some time ago got misplaced into the web site bar.

  182. ANTI
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:10 pm | Permalink

    SquarePeg, perhaps you have a twin.

    J R, I believe that is true, I noticed it in a thread that would relate to the address.

  183. Nathaniel
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:13 pm | Permalink

    Herb,

    I already have more firepower than the average police officer.

    People can already own that.

    Your entire post is full of nothing but absolute ignorance on weapons, the law, and deaths from firearms.

    People in over 30 states are already allowed to own all these weapons under Federal guidelines and approval.

    Please cite one source of someone in another state doing anything you are so afraid of.

    You can’t.

    You have no idea what you are talking about.

  184. Political_mama
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:18 pm | Permalink

    Promise that if you start having flashbacks that you’ll give your guns away and have your dad lock up his.

  185. Nathaniel
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:20 pm | Permalink

    Political Mama,

    Promise me that as long as you don’t want children and believe in aborting them if you do get pregnant that you will not have sex.

  186. BlueJay
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:22 pm | Permalink

    Political mama that was not called for.

    Nathan thinks he is better and better armed than anyone else.

    Let’s try to be better than him.

  187. BlueJay
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:25 pm | Permalink

    See what I mean political mama?

    Nathan and his like do enough of a job shaming themselves. We do not have to “go there”.

  188. Political_mama
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:28 pm | Permalink

    I thought it was a rather realistic request. Asking me to never have sex again is not realistic at all. I’m fixed, so don’t worry about it- I’ve taken responsibility. Fix yourself if your mind starts going.

  189. Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:43 pm | Permalink

    Good night; Good luck;
    God bless – Whatever you conceive God to be!!

    Blessings ALL!!

  190. HerbertWestIII
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:47 pm | Permalink

    Too: Nathaniel, look at CALIFORNIA. LAPD lost Officers when 2 Citizen Gunmen with armored Gear robbed a LA Bank and killed LAPD Officers. These citizens had more “Fire Power” than the Police. The Police were considering looking at the Pawn Shops for Assault Weopans, during this gun fight. This story has been all over the History Channel many times. The Kansas-Partnership Program Director spoke with me today. In his 2 1/2 years as the Director, no Law Enforcement Agency in Kansas has requested an Automatic Weapon. They are available to them. They already can get them thru him. Again, I ask, what does the general public need these?? HERBERT WEST III west.herb@yahoo.com

  191. BlueJay
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:48 pm | Permalink

    Think of it this way political mama.

    You and I, we don’t feel the need to have guns.

    When questioned fairly or unfairly as to his guns , Nathan attacks sex.

    What you have to get is that to Nathan, guns are interchangeable with sex.

  192. StevenEDavis
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 11:52 pm | Permalink

    “At least I asked you to find things to cut – to avoid taking the simpleton route of just taxing the rich more. (and if you read: They don’t have enough money if you took it ALL, to pay off the 9 trillion you throw around).”

    I am asking your candidate what he wants to cut. No answer so far. I see none from you either. Big surprise there. You are such a joke and not terribly funny AmWay. In truth, quite sad…

  193. ANTI
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 12:00 am | Permalink

    Promote victim hood J R, it’s really all you have…It is crazy that as a “low man on the pole”, you wish to be a victim and have all of your rights to protect yourself from being a victim removed…. Self-hating individual, seems to me. I believe that is a mental illness.

  194. ANTI
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 12:06 am | Permalink

    J R, and you are paranoid to boot and don’t seek personal protection…aching to be a victim..WOW! Get help before you start cutting yourself and blaming it on Republicans.

    I am out.

  195. HerbertWestIII
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 12:07 am | Permalink

    I stand corrected, 11 Police Officers and bystanders 7 civilians were wounded after a 44 minute shoot out with these 2 gunmen. On Feb 28 1987, 2 armored gunmen opened fire with more than 1,100 rounds fired in North Hollywood at the Bank of America. The gunmen, Matasareanu, 30, and Larry E. Philips Jr. 26, stormed the bank shortly after 9 am. Matasareanu was hit 29 times by LAPD. He took his own life when his automatic jammed. LAPD then started issuing semi-automatic rifles to qualified officers. Again, why does the general public need 1,100 rounds and the fire power to engage in a 44 minute gun-battle with the police? This is stupid!!!!! Herbert West III west.herb@yahoo.com

  196. Predestined
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 1:36 am | Permalink

    AmWay,

    You probably won’t see this, but you need to calm down and screw your head on.

    filthy rich=mega rich, something you are not, and has nothing to do with soap and water. The mega rich become corporations for “tax relief”, and our government bends over backward for them. Or maybe I should say “bends over” for them, because we all get screwed. Yes, even you. Please recall the oil company execs going to the Capital to cry for more relief, then look at how much money they are currently pocketing. If you truly enjoy being played, you’re welcome to it.

    As for your disagreement about Jesus, he walked with the poor, even though he was a “king”. He didn’t sneer at the poor, and he certainly didn’t cheer the rich on to make more.

    As for your tithing, it appears you do it grudgingly. Maybe you should give that some thought.

9 Trackbacks

  1. [...] Oracle wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptOther groups will be working other areas – Sim Park Red Bridge, Exploration Place, Gander Mountain, Lincoln Street. The main check-in site is at Lawrence Dumont. A couple of the bridges are real problems since the city does not … [...]

  2. [...] Continue Reading [...]

  3. By Buying Central Air Conditioning on May 10, 2008 at 5:57 am

    Buying Central Air Conditioning…

    Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever. ~ Mohandas Gandhi…

  4. By Green House Gas Reduction on May 11, 2008 at 3:09 pm

    Green House Gas Reduction…

    Can it be that your server is infected with a virus – I get an Virus warning when I open your site with Firefox – Just for your Info….

  5. By mars god of war on May 12, 2008 at 8:21 am

    mars god of war…

    To: Maggie Hall…

  6. By fire damage cleanup on May 14, 2008 at 4:16 am

    fire damage cleanup…

    I was looking for more information when i found your post. You will be happy to know you came up #2 in google. Thanks for the work!!…

  7. By Head Up Poker Strategy on May 14, 2008 at 5:12 pm

    Head Up Poker Strategy…

    Organized crime in America takes in over forty billion dollars a year and spends very little on office supplies. Woody Allen….

  8. By Business Really Accept Online Degrees on May 15, 2008 at 9:27 am

    Business Really Accept Online Degrees…

    It is better to die for an idea that will live, than to live for an idea that will die. ~ Steve Biko…

  9. [...] Continue Reading [...]