Open thread 4/25

thread

163 Comments

  1. JMWalker
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 7:08 am | Permalink

    It never ends:

    Today, Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola of the U.S. District Court ordered the White House to once and for all provide “precise information” about its e-mail system.

    The order stems from a lawsuit by the National Security Archive, filed on September 5, 2007 against the Executive Office of the President and the National Archives and Records Administration, claiming that a possible 5-to-10 million e-mails were either improperly preserved as Presidential records, as required by law, or lost entirely.

    House Judiciary Committee chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), in a 2007 address, called such a breach of record-keeping requirements reminiscent of the “18-minute gap” in the infamous Nixon White House tapes, subpoenaed during the Watergate scandal.

    The “missing” e-mails cover a 473-day period, which includes the date of CIA agent Valerie Plame’s outing and a string of U.S. Attorney firings widely believed to have been politically motivated. The White House was ordered to preserve all known e-mail records in November of 2007.

    http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Judge_orders_White_House_to_clarify_0424.html

  2. JMWalker
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 7:12 am | Permalink

    Rush finally showing his true colors, and latching himself onto Coulter. Hey, maybe he’s trying for another wife. How many has this bastion of Republican politics had now? Really excellent example for those Neo-Cons kids, what?
    ================================================

    Talk show host Rush Limbaugh is sparking controversy again after he made comments calling for riots in Denver during the Democratic National Convention this summer.

    He said the riots would ensure a Democrat is not elected as president, and his listeners have a responsibility to make sure it happens.

    “Riots in Denver, the Democrat Convention would see to it that we don’t elect Democrats,” Limbaugh said during Wednesday’s radio broadcast. He then went on to say that’s the best thing that could happen to the country.
    Click here to find out more!

    Limbaugh cited Al Sharpton, saying the Barack Obama supporter threatened to superdelegates that “there’s going to be trouble” if the presidency is taken from Obama.

    Several callers called in to the radio show to denounce Limbaugh’s comments, when he later stated, “I am not inspiring or inciting riots, I am dreaming of riots in Denver.”

    Limbaugh said with massive riots in Denver, which he called “Operation Chaos,” the people on the far left would look bad.

    “There won’t be riots at our convention,” Limbaugh said of the Republican National Convention. “We don’t riot. We don’t burn our cars. We don’t burn down our houses. We don’t kill our children. We don’t do half the things the American left does.”

    He believes electing Democrats will hurt America’s security and economy and appeared to call on his listeners to make sure that doesn’t happen.

    “We do, hopefully, the right thing for the sake of this country. We’re the only one in charge of our affairs. We don’t farm out our defense if we elect Democrats … and riots in Denver, at the Democratic Convention will see to it we don’t elect Democrats. And that’s the best damn thing that can happen to this country, as far as I can think,” Limbaugh said.

    Later, Limbaugh downplayed his “dreaming of riots in Denver” statement, and said that he wasn’t calling for riots and was referring to warnings of trouble if superdelegates decide the nomination at the Democratic National Convention.

    Limbaugh’s comments prompted Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper to say: “Anyone who would call for riots in an American city has clearly lost their bearings.”

    Denver will host the DNC on Aug. 25 to Aug. 28.

    http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/15980105/detail.html

  3. JMWalker
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 7:16 am | Permalink

    The Central Intelligence Agency knew from the beginning that its secret detention and torturous interrogation tactics probably bordered on illegal from the start, according to new documents identified through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit.

    In a filing yesterday, the CIA said it had identified 7,000 pages of classified memos, emails and other records relating to President Bush’s secret detention and interrogation program. Human rights groups quickly jumped on the filing — which came after their own Freedom of Information Act lawsuit seeking information about those detained.

    The CIA also acknowledged in their filings that the program “will continue.” Terror suspects detained or “renditioned” by the United States are transferred to third party countries that allow torture which gives the US a legal loophole to allow harsh interrogation without being legally liable. Such suspects, who effectively disappear, are held without access to courts.

    http://rawstory.com/news/2008/CIA_knew_secret_detention_interrogation_program_0424.html

  4. Political_mama
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 7:25 am | Permalink

    Good Morning Webloggers, ready for another day of catfighting, personal attacks, and snark?

    Ah, the smell of fresh meat.

  5. HerbertWestIII
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 7:29 am | Permalink

    It doesnt seem that the issue is what is Legal or Illegal. It seems to only matter on who does it to who. They dont look at why, just who. One bully over another. We are allowed because we are prodomiantly white. They are prodomiantly non-white. We are Christian to the point of Human Torture. We are allowed to torture because we have an all forgiving GOD. Heathens in control based on lies, false claims and spolied arrogance. The right to hate and respond because we fell out white instead of dark. We have the right to beat someone for spending their money on chicken, because we have stock in beef. How dare they!! United States of Bigots. Herbert West III west.herb@yahoo.com http://www.wen2k.com

  6. HerbertWestIII
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 7:31 am | Permalink

    It doesnt seem that the issue is what is Legal or Illegal. It seems to only matter on who does it to who. They dont look at why, just who. One bully over another. We are allowed because we are prodomiantly white. They are prodomiantly non-white. We are Christian to the point of Human Torture. We are allowed to torture because we have an all forgiving GOD. Heathens in control based on lies, false claims and spolied arrogance. The right to hate and respond because we fell out white instead of dark. We have the right to beat someone for spending their money on chicken, because we have stock in beef. How dare they! United States of Bigots. Herbert Lynn West III west.herb@yahoo.com wen2k.com

  7. HerbertWestIII
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 7:31 am | Permalink

    It doesnt seem that the issue is what is Legal or Illegal. It seems to only matter on who does it to who. They dont look at why, just who. One bully over another. We are allowed because we are prodomiantly white. They are prodomiantly non-white. We are Christian to the point of Human Torture. We are allowed to torture because we have an all forgiving GOD. Heathens in control based on lies, false claims and spolied arrogance. The right to hate and respond because we fell out white instead of dark. We have the right to beat someone for spending their money on chicken, because we have stock in beef. How dare they! United States of Bigots. Herbert Lynn West III west.herb@yahoo.com wen2k.com

  8. HerbertWestIII
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 7:33 am | Permalink

    It keeps saying duplicate post detected when I am trying to post 1 time. They are falsifying this and putting multiple posts to fake a justification to cancel registrations. Herb West III west.herb@yahoo.com http://www.wen2k.com

  9. Political_mama
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 7:35 am | Permalink

    everyone out to get you Herb?

  10. writerdog
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 7:49 am | Permalink

    “I am not inspiring or inciting riots, I am dreaming of riots in Denver.”
    Gee that sounds familiar, Kind of like when my oldest son hit his younger brother and I told him he was not to hit his brother. “I did not hit him…. I touched him really hard!”. I then asked him after a swat, “Would you call that a spanking or a love pat?”. Maybe Rush should get a spanking for that…. the line forms here people! :>

  11. HerbertWestIII
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 7:54 am | Permalink

    Too Politcal_mama and others, noone gives positive merit or positive responces here. We give opinions that reflect how we feel the negative side of these subjects bother us and others. Post a positve subject and you will get about 1% responces in comparison to the ones we see now. Is everyone out to get me? No just the spoken of a$$ho(e$ here as posted by all!!!! Herb West III west.herb@yahoo.com http://www.wen2k.com

  12. Posted April 25, 2008 at 7:55 am | Permalink

    Interesting Statistics from the DOD. Does anyone have any theories to explain the high military death rates in the 80’s?

    http://siadapp.dmdc.osd.mil/personnel/CASUALTY/Death_Rates.pdf

  13. Wahine_Tara
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 7:58 am | Permalink

    I still see a lot of spam on this blog, despite registration. Has the Eagle considered using Google’s code?
    http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/01/preventing-comment-spam.html

    It won’t block spam, per say, but it will prevent outside sources from profiting by posting links. Normally, there is a referral id when you click on a link that pays these scumbags. This google tool blocks any referral ids, so even if people post spam links, they won’t get credit for them. Might work to cut down the fat.

  14. CF2K
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 8:09 am | Permalink

    JMWalker,

    Indeed. Rush Limbaugh’s incitements to violence in order disrupt the Democratic Party’s convention in Denver confirm just what a fascist he is and always has been.

    That’s right, Wingnuts: FASCIST. The fascist he reminds me of most is Julius Streicher, publisher of the anti-Jewish Nazi paper “Der Sturmer.”

    “For the course of some twenty-five years, Streicher educated the German people in hatred and incited them to the persecution and to the extermination of the Jewish race. He was an accessory to murder, on a scale perhaps never attained before.”

    http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/Streicher.html

    Rush Limbaugh is a drug-addict who appears to have a taste for purchasing Viagra-fueled child sex in the Dominican Republic.

    http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0706062rush1.html

    He also is the most powerful voice in the Republican Party.

  15. writerdog
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 8:11 am | Permalink

    Herb,though I seldom comment on your posts, I do value them. I tend to be focused on the National over the state. So you do cause me to think once in awhile closer to home…Sorry that I have not been paying more attention to your post or at least enough to note there are here.

  16. writerdog
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 8:18 am | Permalink

    OK I know its coming, it was just to tasty to not to, a Republican running for re-election that gave a speech to the American Nazi party on Hitler’s birthday! He had said he would speak to any group that invited him to speak. He accepted the invite from the American Nazi party and I am sure there is a picture somewhere of him standing in front of a portrait of Hitler! I just was not going to look it up! Can anyone say “ahhh Dumb azzz move there bud!”

  17. CF2K
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 8:23 am | Permalink

    writerdog,

    Indeed. ‘A picture is worth a thousand words’ and all that.

    http://thenewsdispatch.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&SubSectionID=1&ArticleID=12532

  18. Boxlock
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 8:34 am | Permalink

    Food Crisis Starts Eclipsing Climate Change Worries
    Gore Ducks, as a Backlash Builds Against Biofuels
    By JOSH GERSTEIN, Staff Reporter of the Sun | April 25, 2008

    “With prices for rice, wheat, and corn soaring, food-related unrest has broken out in places such as Haiti, Indonesia, and Afghanistan. Several countries have blocked the export of grain. There is even talk that governments could fall if they cannot bring food costs down.”
    http://www.nysun.com/news/food-crisis-eclipsing-climate-change

    “Mr. Gore was not available for an interview yesterday on the food crisis, according to his spokeswoman. A spokesman for Mr. Gore’s public campaign to address climate change, the Alliance for Climate Protection, declined to comment for this article.”

    Well I guess so, the goon! This was an obvious result of ‘warming hysteria’ from the start.
    Where the heck is ‘cosmos’ when we want to hear his take on this?

  19. Regular
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 8:42 am | Permalink

    kansassam
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 7:55 am | Permalink

    Interesting Statistics from the DOD. Does anyone have any theories to explain the high military death rates in the 80’s?

    Sam,

    The military was larger in size back, so statistically you will see larger numbers.

    Also, the largest contributor was motor vehicle accidents. Drinking and driving combined with cavalier attitudes of driving too fast for conditions (rain, snow, night time) were responsible for most of the deaths.

    If you look at the civilian population, motor vehicle accidents were proportionately higher as well.

  20. KansasNative
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 8:42 am | Permalink

    CF2K

    Really…they aren’t NAZIs!!!

  21. Posted April 25, 2008 at 8:44 am | Permalink

    Thread creep. From yesterday’s open:

    From P_Mom
    Sol I wish I was a nurse, I did go all the way through school for it, but I am not. I’m merely an aide in that job.
    ****************************************************

    P_Mom,
    There you go. Finish what it is you need to to become and RN. Much better pay scale. Also, consider your location. As I said last night, Florida is RIPE with opportunity for RNs. Great weather too. Head for the Tampa area. Great weather and not too bad on the hurricanes. The housing market is perfect for a buyer right now as well.

    Point being, there is opportunity within your grasp. If you choose not to strive for it, that is your shortcoming and not the fault of anyone around you.

  22. Heckler
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 8:47 am | Permalink

    CF JM

    Take a pill.

  23. Heckler
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 8:48 am | Permalink

    From Boortz

    ‘We in Denmark cannot figure out why you are even bothering to hold an election.
    On one side, you have a lawyer who is married to a lawyer, and a lawyer who is married to a lawyer.
    On the other side, you have a true war hero married to a blonde with a huge chest who owns a beer distributorship.
    Is there a contest here?’

  24. Posted April 25, 2008 at 8:49 am | Permalink

    From Junior
    And now solie calls me junior.
    All the respect is gone fella.
    *************************************************************

    My heart is broken. I may never recover. The blame everyone but myself, my hand is forever open to gov’t hand outs whine baby has no respect for me. Boo hoo.

    Because I divorced a mental case, I ‘failed’ my first wife and child. Mmmm K. You too are divorced junior. The difference is I have moved on, met an amazing woman 8 years ago and have been with her ever since, and become quite successful in my business endeavors. This somehow makes me an elitist.

    So being successful and finding love is something junior has failed to accomplish. Instead of looking to himself for his faults, he projects them on to others. Great socialist outlook there junior. Try growing up and acting like an adult. Personal responsibility. It isn’t just for conservatives anymore. Try it once.

  25. Posted April 25, 2008 at 8:52 am | Permalink

    From Chas
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 1:05 am | Permalink
    Sol — You have NEVER proven me a liar yet!!

    Find out why you have such inner anger, Sol

    **********************************************************

    Chas, you have been proven a liar by me and many others. Every time you twist and squirm, but never admit it. So what is the point of digging up all the lies you have posted if you still, after being overwhelmingly proven to be wrong, refuse to admit your lies. Mad of God? Me thinks not.

    My inner anger, this from the king of caps lock. Oh, there is one for you chas, you lied that your stroke causes your incessant caps lock problem, that just so happens to occur at just the right times. Kinda like the bolding occurred in that obit you posted.

  26. Posted April 25, 2008 at 8:53 am | Permalink

    sb Man of God…

  27. CF2K
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 8:54 am | Permalink

    Heckler,

    “CF JM

    Take a pill.”

    Oh, you mean a Viagra pill, like Rush Limbaugh? And then go molest some children in the Dominican Republic, like Rush Limbaugh?

    Wingnuts are fine with terrorist tactics like disrupting party conventions so long as they’re the perpetrators.

  28. CF2K
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 8:55 am | Permalink

    Boxlock,

    People are hungry because Al Gore fooled them into thinking they didn’t have any food?

    Your post makes sense…how?

  29. Heckler
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 8:59 am | Permalink

    CF

    There won’t be any Republicans needed to disrupt the Democrat party convention. They’ll take care of that themselves.

    We’ll just be standing next to the water cannons RFLOAO.

  30. Grateful_Dave
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 8:59 am | Permalink

    Here’s a real sob story for you. Company loses 700+ million so salary is reduced to only 10 million.

    Countrywide’s CEO takes home millions
    Associated Press
    Published: Friday April 25, 2008

    SEC filing shows Angelo Mozilo was paid $10.8 million in compensation and realized $121.5 million in stock options last year, when lender was slammed by housing crisis.

    CALABASAS, Calif. (AP) — A securities filing shows Countrywide Financial Corp. CEO Angelo Mozilo earned about $10.8 million in total compensation and cashed out $121.5 million in stock options last year.

    The compensation disclosed in the Securities and Exchange Commission filing released Thursday represents a nearly 80% cut from the 70-year-old’s 2006 pay of about $51 million.

    The Calabasas, Calif.-based company reported a yearly loss of $704 million in 2007 amid the nationwide mortgage market meltdown.

    Countrywide (CFC, Fortune 500) agreed in January to be acquired by Bank of America Corp. (BAC, Fortune 500) for $4.1 billion in stock.

    The SEC has been scrutinizing the timing of Mozilo’s stock sales. Mozilo has said he’s cooperating with the inquiry and has denied making any improper trades. To top of page

  31. Regular
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 9:16 am | Permalink

    <b?Proof that Iran is supplying Weapons in Iraq

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. military says it has found caches of newly made Iranian weapons in Iraq, leading senior officials to conclude Tehran is continuing to funnel armaments into Iraq despite its pledges to the contrary, the Wall Street Journal reported Friday.

    Officials in Washington and Baghdad said the purported Iranian mortars, rockets and explosives had date stamps indicating they were manufactured in the past two months. The U.S. plans to publicize the weapons caches in coming days. A pair of senior commanders said a presentation was tentatively planned for Monday, the paper reported.

    “You can see the manufacturing dates right on the armaments themselves,” one senior commander in Baghdad said. “These are very clearly weapons that were made in the last month or so.”
    AP

  32. lindainks55
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 9:23 am | Permalink

    “WASHINGTON — The U.S. military says it has found caches of newly made Iranian weapons in Iraq, leading senior officials to conclude…”

    “Officials in Washington…”
    ——————–

    Because of their many past lies I don’t believe anything they have to say. They have NO credibility. This is their latest victim, the latest place to lay the blame. The sky is falling, the sky is falling…

  33. Regular
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 9:29 am | Permalink

    Yeah lindainks, everyone lies – especially those who don’t perform the ’sheeple over the cliff dance’ like Democratic Party automatons.

  34. BlueJay
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 9:31 am | Permalink

    ““There won’t be riots at our convention,”

    The (GOP convention)

    Or cameras. Or reporters. Or any media.

    Just a bunch of rich old white guys trying really hard to stay awake.

  35. BlueJay
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 9:33 am | Permalink

    Do these newly found weapons have…

    “Made in Iran”

    printed on them….in English?

    Like the last bunch of “Iranian” weapons?

  36. Boxlock
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 9:34 am | Permalink

    CF2K,
    “It takes around 400 pounds of corn to make 25 gallons of ethanol,” Mr. Senauer, also an applied economics professor at Minnesota, said. “It’s not going to be a very good diet but that’s roughly enough to keep an adult person alive for a year.”

    Corn = Food OR Ethanol. Make Ethanol and the corn used cannot be used for food.
    Go back and read the link.

  37. Posted April 25, 2008 at 9:37 am | Permalink

    I’m kinda with Linda on this one. The administration has been painting Iran in poor light for years. Kind of priming the pump for the next invasion/war.

    If the cache was found… what, days ago? Then why are they waiting to go public with it? Seems to me if the data was so damning, there would be no reason to ramp it up, just expose it.

    Someone posted a week or so ago about a possible impending military action against Iran. With Cheney’s recent whirl wind unannounced tour of our ‘buddies’ in the region, it seemed plausible.

    Given the bad information we used prior to invading Iraq, prudence would be the safest course for the US.

  38. Regular
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 9:39 am | Permalink

    So Sol,

    You agree with lindainks and really don’t care if Iran is supplying weapons to Iraqi insurgents to kill our troops.

  39. Posted April 25, 2008 at 9:41 am | Permalink

    Rev. Jeremiah Wright: “The persons who have heard the entire sermon understand the communication perfectly. When something is taken like a sound bite for a political purpose and put constantly over and over again, looped in the face of the public. That’s not a failure to communicate. Those who are doing that are communicating exactly what they want to do, which is to paint me as some sort of fanatic or as the learned journalist from the New York Times called me, a ‘wackadoodle.’ It’s to paint me as something: ‘Something’s wrong with me. There’s nothing wrong with this country…for its policies. We’re perfect. Our hands are free. Our hands have no blood on them.’ That’s not a failure to communicate. The message that is being communicated by the sound bites is exactly what those pushing those sound bites want to communicate.”

    Bill Moyers: “What do you think they wanted to communicate?”

    Rev. Wright: “I think they wanted to communicate that I am unpatriotic, that I am un-American, that I am filled with hate speech, that I have a cult at Trinity United Church of Christ. And by the way, guess who goes to his church, hint, hint, hint? That’s what they wanted to communicate. They know nothing about the church. They know nothing about our prison ministry. They know nothing about our food ministry. They know nothing about our senior citizens home. They know nothing about all we try to do as a church and have tried to do, and still continue to do as a church that believes what Martin Marty said, that the two worlds have to be together. And that the gospel of Jesus Christ has to speak to those worlds, not only in terms of the preached message on a Sunday morning but in terms of the lived-out ministry throughout the week.”

    Moyers: “What did you think when you began to see those very brief sound bites circulating as they did?”

    Rev. Wright: “I felt it was unfair. I felt it was unjust. I felt it was untrue. I felt for those who were doing that, were doing it for some very devious reasons.”

    The Bill Moyers interview with Reverend Wright airs tonight at 9 on PBS.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2008/4/25/headlines#1

  40. KansasNative
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 9:42 am | Permalink

    “Just a bunch of rich old white guys trying really hard to stay awake.”

    Hmmm…stay out of the public bathrooms, watch for old coots dressed in women’s underwear/clothes, and for godsakes don’t let your children (male or female) near the pervs!

  41. Posted April 25, 2008 at 9:42 am | Permalink

    I agree with Linda that we should proceed with caution. If our troops weren’t there, they couldn’t be killed with Iranian weapons.

  42. ksgrm
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 9:47 am | Permalink

    Boxlock a little more on the topic from above. Once again the GWers have pushed through their agenda and the poor of the world have been suffering. Now it is moving up to us all.

    ————————-

    “One factor being blamed for the price hikes is the use of government subsidies to promote the use of corn for ethanol production. An estimated 30% of America’s corn crop now goes to fuel, not food.

    “I don’t think anybody knows precisely how much ethanol contributes to the run-up in food prices, but the contribution is clearly substantial,” a professor of applied economics and law at the University of Minnesota, C. Ford Runge, said. A study by a Washington think tank, the International Food Policy Research Institute, indicated that between a quarter and a third of the recent hike in commodities prices is attributable to biofuels.

    Last year, Mr. Runge and a colleague, Benjamin Senauer, wrote an article in Foreign Affairs, “How Biofuels Could Starve the Poor.”

    “We were criticized for being alarmist at the time,” Mr. Runge said. “I think our views, looking back a year, were probably too conservative.”

    http://www.nysun.com/news/food-crisis-eclipsing-climate-change

    Where is Cosmos when we need him to explain how this is fake science and not peer reviewed.

  43. kansasdem
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 9:54 am | Permalink

    At Brownback’s next editorial board, I hope someone asks him if he repudiate’s John Hagee and his bigot ideas about the Catholic Church (”the great whore.”)

    Does he still welcome the support of bigots like Hagee? What role did he play in brokering Hagee’s endorsement of McCain? Would he do it again?

  44. ksgrm
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 9:55 am | Permalink

    This is for WS who was throwing Scalias name around as being against the Bush v Gore decision.

    “”I say nonsense,” Scalia responds to Stahl’s observation that people say the Supreme Court’s decision in Gore v. Bush was based on politics and not justice. “Get over it. It’s so old by now. The principal issue in the case, whether the scheme that the Florida Supreme Court had put together violated the federal Constitution, that wasn’t even close. The vote was seven to two,” he says, referring to the Supreme Court’s decision that the Supreme Court of Florida’s method for recounting ballots was unconstitutional.

    Furthermore, says the outspoken conservative justice, it was Al Gore who ultimately put the issue into the courts. “It was Al Gore who made it a judicial question…. We didn’t go looking for trouble. It was he who said, ‘I want this to be decided by the courts,’” says Scalia. “What are we supposed to say — ‘Not important enough?’” he jokes.”

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/04/24/60minutes/main4040290.shtml

    As I said the other day “Get over it”.

  45. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:00 am | Permalink

    Hey Boxlock, if a few million people have to starve to death to save the planet.

    Well, Al Gore must think that’s ok.

  46. BlueJay
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:01 am | Permalink

    Hey old rich lady?

    “As I said the other day “Get over it”.

    Never.

    My hatred for you and your party over that decision will linger even after you are decomposing (faster than now) in the grave.

  47. Boxlock
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:03 am | Permalink

    ksgrm, Posted April 25, 2008 at 9:47 am
    http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-425/#comment-337003

    AGREED!!!

  48. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:06 am | Permalink

    Say Dave, you ever work for a company that had an operating loss?

    They cut your pay by 80%?

  49. Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:12 am | Permalink

    My hatred for you and your party over that decision will linger even after you are decomposing (faster than now) in the grave.

    What an absolutely vile individual. You should really seek help for your anger issues.

  50. CF2K
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:13 am | Permalink

    You pathetic Wingnuts and your strawman arguments: you can’t defeat Gore on what he DID say, so you have to INVENT things you SAY that he said.

    Here’s Al Gore in 2007:

    “Former US Vice President Al Gore spoke in Argentina aboutthe pros and cons of biofuels as a means to combat global climate change. Gore was talking to representatives of the biofuel industry in a Buenos Aires hotel. He warned that the drive to produce alternative fuels must not create new forms of environmental damage. Recently, it has become more clear that in many cases biodiesel is produced in an unsustainable way. Especially in Indonesia and Malaysia, oil palm plantations have caused massive deforestation. The government is encouraging more forest clearing to meet the growing demand for palm oil.

    Speaking in Argentina yesterday, Gore, whose global warming documentary An Inconvenient Truth won an Academy Award this year, said: “Every potential solution much be handled carefully and the danger with biofuels is that extremely valuable forests will be destroyed unnecessarily. “Another danger is that, if it is not pursued carefully, it will drive food prices up.” US President George Bush has announced that he intends to reduce gasoline consumption by 20% in 2017. This would require 35 billion gallons of alternative fuels to replace fossil fuels.

    Not only are the concerns in the industrialized world. South American sceptics worry that the production of biofuels from corn, sugarcane, palm oil and other agricultural products will cause environmental damage and worsen the already severe environmental problems in the third world. As Gore spoke, demonstrators on bicycles and wearing surgical masks chanted slogans outside against multinational agribusinesses, saying the biofuel boom will cause deforestation.”

    http://www.energyportal.eu/news/biomass/al-gore-warns-against-negative-effects-of-biofuels.html

    (What’s especially funny is that the story has Bush pushing biofuels, and Gore urging caution.)

    Once again: if I were a pathetic Wingnut who had no facts on my side, I’d lie about everything, too. In this case, Boxlock, that the story you cite actually DOES mention Gore’s caution regarding biofuels.

    Guess the fact that I called out your avatar, Rush Limbaugh, as a drug-addicted child molester might gotten under your skin a bit, Boxlock. How does it feel to take orders from a drug-addicted child molester, Boxlock?

    ksgrm,

    You show as much class–and as much understanding of the law–as Antonin Scalia. Here’s Digby’s take on Scalia’s frantic attempt to slam the book on his assistance to the stealing of American democracy:

    “Nev. Er. That decision will be hung around his neck like a dead albatross all the way down through the rest of history until the day the world ends.

    It proved he personally was nothing more than a cheap partisan hack. He knows it. He even uses the old cheap partisan hack slogan, “get over it.” The court disgraced itself and the Republican party showed the country and the world that they no longer cared about legitimacy.”

    http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/

    Scum defends scum.

  51. CF2K
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:14 am | Permalink

    Dear Nazi,

    Al Gore doesn’t think that. But you DO seem to be OK with starving to death a few BILLION people so you can be rich.

    Nazi. Do you take viagra and molest children like Rush Limbaugh?

  52. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:18 am | Permalink

    Ah, the beloved Nazi routine by CFUK’R.

    We have Chas’s lies, and JR’s/CF’s absurd, hateful, and jealous personal attacks.

  53. ksgrm
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:21 am | Permalink

    Cf and Jr what about Gore do you think is worth defending even when you are proved to wrong. Gore started the whole GW thing and called for biofuels when he was a Clinton underling. So in 2007 he saw the writing on the wall and backed off that position. Too little too late.

    As for the election – once and for all – Gore cut his own throat by trying to undermine the election. He did it – history showed him for the buffoon he was. Not my call. Just my observation.

    As for your post of one man’s take on Scalia – Well we could have dueling posts but nothing would be proved. Scalia told it exactly the way it happened.

    Live in your delusional world I have an 11 oclock meeting and need to be moving.

  54. CF2K
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:21 am | Permalink

    Dear Nazi,

    And we have your hateful ad hominems, inability to mount a response, and refusal to take responsibilty for your own words and actions.

    Be a man, MG: stop being a Nazi.

  55. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:26 am | Permalink

    Good post at 10:21 KSgrm. I expect to see a very rational and logical rebuttal from the Left now.

    (cough, cough)

  56. CF2K
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:29 am | Permalink

    ksgrm,

    Prove it: document Al Gore’s support for biofuels in the Clinton Administration. Your hearsay doesn’t cut it.

    And, if as is entirely possible, Al Gore DID offer unqualified support to biofuels, well, if John McCain can reverse his position on EVERY SINGLE ISSUE and this is acceptable for him, I see no reason the same logic shouldn’t apply to Vice-President Gore.

    All Scalia “told” was how embarrassed he still feels, and how vindictive he is–and you are–toward anyone who says what everyone knows: the Supreme Court stole the 2000 Florida election for George Bush.

  57. Boxlock
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:30 am | Permalink

    MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:00 am |
    “Hey Boxlock, if a few million people have to starve to death to save the planet.
    Well, Al Gore must think that’s ok.”

    Max, I sometimes think that’s how Gore and the AGW fanatics plan on saving the planet. Exterminating large numbers of people by starvation, etc.
    Ya know, I’m a pretty outdoor kind of guy and want a clean, healthy environment, I really do. I do what I can also. My wife an I, in spite of our ages, still camp and hike the mountains, so that is of interest to me as well as the larger, global implications of AGW if it exists. But we have to be somewhat practical. To cause immediate human suffering and destroy the economy for immature science on AGW is just plain dumb.
    Same applies to the western coal plant controversy. Coal is cheap and plentiful, if we need energy, lets use it. Sure explore and utilize wind, nuclear sources, hydro where possible, etc. but lets not harm ourselves until sure of the practicality of it’s wide scale use. Plus we have to be a state of laws and not trendy whims. Those plants meet all regulatory requirements in place, there is no legal basis for denying their construction.

  58. CF2K
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:31 am | Permalink

    Dear Nazi,

    The terms “rational” and “logical” don’t sound terribly significant coming from you, given your penchant for calling anyone even slightly to the left of Attila the Hun a “socialist.”

  59. CF2K
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    Boxlock,

    Serious question: what is your threshold for ascertaining what constitutes “mature” science?

  60. Predestined
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:34 am | Permalink

    …especially those who don’t perform the ’sheeple over the cliff dance’ like Democratic Party automatons.

    I present Rush Limbaugh as evidence of the untruth of your statement, Regular.

    Funny how Republicans taunt Democrats and Liberals with the term “sheeple”, when it’s the Conservatives who have and continue to march in lock step with their leaders, never questioning anything.

  61. Predestined
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:35 am | Permalink

    Sol,

    What possessed you to bring your childish bickering with JR to today’s Open Thread?

    You both need a time out in the corner.

  62. Phantom
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:35 am | Permalink

    Looks like all commodities are getting in on the action, and going through the roof. Not just bio fuel crops.

  63. lindainks55
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:36 am | Permalink

    group think, mob rule, hysteria incited by their heroes like rush…

  64. Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:36 am | Permalink

    Predestined
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:35 am | Permalink

    Can you just spank me instead?

  65. outlander
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:36 am | Permalink

    Chuckle… It is hilarious to see everyone running from biofuels.

    The fact is that there are no easy answers. Nukes are the only real solution. The founder of Greenpeace also thinks so.

    “Greenpeace founder Patrick Moore says there is no proof global warming is caused by humans, but it is likely enough that the world should turn to nuclear power – a concept tied closely to the underground nuclear testing his former environmental group formed to oppose.”

    “The only viable solution is to build hundreds of nuclear power plants over the next century, Moore told the Boise Metro Chamber of Commerce on Wednesday. There isn’t enough potential for wind, solar, hydroelectric, and geothermal or other renewable energy sources, he said.”

    http://www.idahostatesman.com/newsupdates/story/360625.html

  66. BlueJay
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:38 am | Permalink

    “Those plants meet all regulatory requirements in place, there is no legal basis for denying their construction.”

    Except that the people of Kansas do not need or want them.

  67. Boxlock
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:38 am | Permalink

    I love it!
    Max and ksgrm, you’re beating them up like they are rabid dogs. :twisted:

  68. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:39 am | Permalink

    Gore was instrumental in pushing America’s ethanol production and the burning of the worlds food supply. And the children are now starving.

    From his own frickin web site:

    http://algore2008.net/accomplishments2.html

    GORE HAS BEEN A STRONG SUPPORTER OF ETHANOL

    A Strong Supporter of Ethanol. As Vice President, and as a Member of Congress, Al Gore has been a strong supporter of ethanol. In 1994, he cast the tie-breaking vote to defeat legislation that would have prohibited the EPA from implementing its rule mandating the use of ethanol in reformulated gasoline. In addition, Al Gore cosponsored Senate legislation to promote and encourage the development of ethanol.

    The Vehicle Energy Efficiency Performance Standards Act. In 1988, Al Gore was an original cosponsor of the Vehicle Energy Efficiency Performance Standards Act, which attempted to establish a national farm ethanol program.

    Resolution Supporting Use of Ethanol. In 1987, Al Gore cosponsored a resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) should encourage states to mandate the use of alternative fuels, such as ethanol, in commercial fleets as part of an air pollution control strategy.

    The Methanol and Ethanol Vehicle Incentives Act. In 1985, Al Gore cosponsored the Methanol and Ethanol Vehicle Incentives Act, which sought to encourage the development of automobiles that run on methanol or ethanol fuels.

  69. Boxlock
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:42 am | Permalink

    CF2K
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:32 am
    “Boxlock,
    “Serious question: what is your threshold for ascertaining what constitutes “mature” science?”

    Fair question…when there are smaller numbers in the scientific community that refute a lot of what is being claimed about AGW.
    And when we know the medicine isn’t far more harmful than the problem.

  70. Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:43 am | Permalink

    This is precisely why government should not intervene. By the government, and not just Gore, promoting Ethanol, we have the problem we have today.

    No subsidies, no tax breaks, no grants. Let the market dictate the most viable alternative energy source.

  71. CF2K
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:44 am | Permalink

    ksgrm,

    It is a LIE that Gore filed the suit. Bush did. Here is the timeline.

    “2000 Election Chronology

    Tuesday, Nov. 7—Election Day. Pundits have predicted a tight race between Texas governor George W. Bush and Vice President Al Gore, but few expect one of the closest elections in U.S. history. By early evening, it’s clear the election hinges on Florida.
    Wednesday, Nov. 8—Gore calls Bush at approximately 3 A.M. to concede, but retracts the concession shortly after, because Bush’s razor-slim lead prompts an automatic recount. He leads Gore by about 1,210 votes out of nearly 6 million cast in Florida. Meanwhile Gore leads in both the national popular count and the electoral college.
    An unusual amount of votes for third-party candidates in Palm Beach County leads to disputes over the county’s “butterfly ballots.” A number of ballots in other counties are disqualified because the chad > the small piece of paper punched out of punch-card ballots—did not fully detach from the ballot.
    Thursday, Nov. 9—Gore’s camp requests a hand recount of the approximately 1.8 million ballots cast in Palm Beach, Miami-Dade, Broward, and Volusia counties, Democratic strongholds.
    Friday, Nov. 10—Florida’s automatic recount is completed. The Associated Press reports that Bush has retained his lead but only by 327 votes.
    Saturday, Nov. 11—The Bush team, led by former secretary of state James Baker, files suit in federal court to block Gore’s request for a hand recount.”

    http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0884144.html

    Kind of undermines your interpretation of events, now doesn’t it, ksgrm? You’re wrong: just “get over it.”

  72. BlueJay
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:46 am | Permalink

    “smaller numbers”

    You MEAN negligible numbers. And paid off by fossil fuels to boot.

    “whenn we know the medicine isn’t far more harmful than the problem.”

    You mean the fossil fuels industries are gonna take a hit?

    Uh…

    SO?

  73. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:46 am | Permalink

    Say Boxlock, ditto on your 10:30 post.

    Also into the great outdoors and enjoy mountain hiking (Colorado!), tent camping, fishing, hunting, etc….

    Many people don’t understand the conservation work done by the NRA, Izaak Walton League, and other hunting/conservation groups.

    It’s a huge lie the Libs tell about conservatives – that we hate the environment.

  74. Regular
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:47 am | Permalink

    CF2K
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:44 am
    Kind of undermines your interpretation of events, now doesn’t it, ksgrm? You’re wrong: just “get over it.”

    Gore lost, just get over it.

  75. Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:51 am | Permalink

    Zero emissions car…

    http://www.popularmechanics.com/automotive/new_cars/4217016.html

    You’ll never guess what powers it…

  76. CF2K
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:51 am | Permalink

    Dear Nazi,

    Quite a trick, copying materials from the Al Gore site. When I tried, a warning box came up that said I couldn’t use their materials without permission.

    Did you ask real nice, Nazi?

    As for the evidence you present, I said, above, that if Wingnuts have no problems McCain’s reversals for political expedience–such as his inquiries into switching to the Democratic Party earlier this decade), they shouldn’t have any problem with Al Gore’s change of mind on ethanol on the grounds of the principle of double effect.

    And in fact, given that in “An Inconvenient Truth,” he expressed the willingness for his family to move away from producing tobacco once its destructive effects became known, it’s equally consistent for him to reconsider his support for ethanol in the light of unforeseen consequences.

    What is telling is that Bush still supports ethanol and other biofuels. But then, nobody ever expected Bush to do anything BUT to starve the poor–as in New Orleans.

  77. Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:53 am | Permalink

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-A3XHFT5qc

  78. Boxlock
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:53 am | Permalink

    “Many people don’t understand the conservation work done by the NRA, Izaak Walton League, and other hunting/conservation groups.
    It’s a huge lie the Libs tell about conservatives – that we hate the environment.”

    Exactly Max, it’s so much easier to hate us, and folks like the NRA, than to find out what we/they really stand for, and how much we/they do to promote exactly what the Libs are trying to force through socialistic ideologies that end up harming.

  79. Predestined
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:56 am | Permalink

    Sol,

    Sorry, I’m not into kinky. Ask that great wife of yours to do it.

  80. MaxGrobnik
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:57 am | Permalink

    Nice try CF, keep defending Gore by attacking McCain and Bush.

    Can you not mount a response defending Gore?

    (Copy and paste CF, real tough. LOL!)

  81. Political_mama
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:57 am | Permalink

    Sol there is so much more to it than you even know man. So don’t even go there with the ‘if you would only’…don’t you think I would do that if i could?

    Do I not seem intelligent enough to try to make that happen?

    CF, what’s this Rush child molesting thing?

  82. Predestined
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:58 am | Permalink

    The U.S. is not the only country affected by the drop in food production and higher prices.

    Was it on Sam’s Club website that I saw the purchase of rice is limited? Gotta check that out again.

  83. Predestined
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 11:03 am | Permalink

    Tara,

    It appears that WordPress blogs may be the worst hit when it comes to spam. I deleted over 2,000 spam messages yesterday on a client’s blog. All were on relatively old topics/threads, but it’s going the same way guestbooks went, full of useless spam. Do these companies who pay for this to be done understand that, once I see their listing in a spam post, I won’t bother to check them out or ever purchase their product/services?

  84. Predestined
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 11:06 am | Permalink

    I didn’t find the rice rationing comment on Sam’s Club website, but I did find the link below to a blog discussion about it. Apparently I wasn’t dreaming. Limit of 4 bags at Sam’s, and Cotsco is also limiting. Perhaps only in CA? Not sure.

    http://www.blogrunner.com/snapshot/D/0/9/walmarts_sams_club_chain_limits_rice_purchase/

  85. Grateful_Dave
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 11:07 am | Permalink

    Say Dave, you ever work for a company that had an operating loss?

    They cut your pay by 80%?

    If I was responsible for the company’s performance, I would expect them to can my ass – not reward me.

  86. Boxlock
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 11:08 am | Permalink

    Predestined,
    Your post of 11:03 am, what spam?
    I’m serious, I am not seeing any coming to me, where would it be coming to that I would see it.
    Is it spam on the blog itself, or email or what?
    Sorry, just trying to understand what’s going on with that.

  87. SolDevVB
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 11:09 am | Permalink

    Predestined
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:56 am | Permalink

    Glad to see you have a sense of humor (cough cough)

  88. Boxlock
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 11:10 am | Permalink

    “Limit of 4 bags at Sam’s, and Cotsco is also limiting. Perhaps only in CA? Not sure.”

    I read on the east and west coasts in the ethnic communities that eat a lot of rice.

  89. lindainks55
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 11:11 am | Permalink

    Pre, I think those bags are really BIG ones, but rationing / limiting foodstuffs is indicative of very serious times.

    Yet, the idiot in charge still says it isn’t as bad as it seems, just a little glitch, a slowdown…

    Like he still has credibility on anything. NOT!

  90. SolDevVB
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 11:11 am | Permalink

    P_Mom,

    All I have to go by is what you offered. From what you offered, you are in your situation because of decisions you have made. I can’t justify bitching or blaming my lot in life on someone else when it was my decisions that got me where I am. And also that by making other decisions now, I can pull myself up.

  91. RFL
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 11:26 am | Permalink

    That’s not enough for Lilly Epps, an activist who joined the pastors in denouncing Planned Parenthood on Thursday. She said she was 26 years old when she got an abortion in the clinic used to stage the protest. She said the day has come to get “the truth” out about Planned Parenthood and what it is doing her community.

    “I am a mad black woman,” she said. “Words cannot say how angry I am, how ignorant I was. But I thank God I came to the truth

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,352537,00.html

    ==================================================
    Keep up the great work Planned Parenthood and abortion providers everywhere! Just remember, the communities in which you do “business” are worse off because of you.

  92. kansassam
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 11:49 am | Permalink

    Boxlock

    Go to the WEblog Open Thread from like 3/31 and scroll to the bottom. You will find the spam!

  93. Regular
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 11:52 am | Permalink

    Predestined
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 11:06 am | Permalink

    I didn’t find the rice rationing comment on Sam’s Club website, but I did find the link below to a blog discussion about it. Apparently I wasn’t dreaming. Limit of 4 bags at Sam’s, and Cotsco is also limiting. Perhaps only in CA? Not sure.
    ————————–
    SAM’s eh?

    What are the bag’s size? 20 pounds? that does make a difference.

  94. RFL
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 11:54 am | Permalink

    A man heckling First Lady Laura Bush and daughter Jenna outside the 92nd Street Y was arrested after he punched a wheelchair-bound girl whose parents had told him to shut up, authorities said Wednesday.

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,352498,00.html

    =============================================

    Tip to “peace” loving war protesters: Avoid assaulting people in wheelchairs.

  95. Regular
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 11:56 am | Permalink

    hah! A good guess on my part. :)

    Sam’s Club, Costco limit rice purchases as prices rise

    Sam’s Club said it will limit customers to four bags at a time of imported jasmine, basmati and long grain white rice.

    Sam’s Club declined to say if this is first time it has restricted sales of bulk foods. The limits affect 20-pound bags, not retail-sized portions. Costco could not immediately be reached for comment on its limits or whether they are the first ever.

    “California’s had a pretty good crop, but basmati and jasmine consumers have a history of not switching,” he said. “They could always have bought cheaper Calrose. But they don’t.”

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080423/ap_on_bi_ge/wal_mart_rice

  96. Regular
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 11:58 am | Permalink

    #
    RFL
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 11:54 am | Permalink

    A man heckling First Lady Laura Bush and daughter Jenna outside the 92nd Street Y was arrested after he punched a wheelchair-bound girl whose parents had told him to shut up, authorities said Wednesday.

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,352498,00.html

    =============================================

    Tip to “peace” loving war protesters: Avoid assaulting people in wheelchairs.
    ——————————————

    Sounds like something J R would do.

  97. SolDevVB
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 11:59 am | Permalink

    This one is going to get ugly…

    I think McCain did the right thing.

    Dear Fellow Conservative,
    It’s safe to say that we’re all watching John McCain closely in trying to assess whether he’s worthy of our support this November.
    Senator McCain’s done some good things in recent times, but he’s also committed some blunders that we, as conservatives, need to pay attention to.
    Wednesday was one of those blunders.
    McCain asked the North Carolina GOP not to run a television ad that highlighted Barack Obama’s ties to his Pastor of twenty years, Jeremiah Wright.
    The ad did not involve the presidential election – it merely pointed out that the two Democratic candidates in the North Carolina governor’s race had both endorsed Obama, and that because of that, they were too extreme for conservative North Carolina.
    Here’s a link to an article that discusses the situation.
    If John McCain is intent on micromanaging the message of individual state parties, and at the same time unwilling to link his potential Democratic opponent with a revealing character issue, then it sheds doubt on whether he’s got the stomach to mount an effective and winning general election campaign.
    McCain needs to tell why he should be president, but also why his opponent should not be president.
    Seeing as this is a very important matter, we’ve set up a poll at ConservativeHQ.com where you can register your opinion on McCain’s latest blunder, as well as other issues important to conservatives.
    Please take a few moments to tell us what you think. Thank you for helping us advance the conservative cause.
    Sincerely,
    Richard A. Viguerie
    ConservativeHQ.com
    9625 Surveyor Court
    Suite 400
    Manassas, Virginia 20110

  98. RFL
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 12:02 pm | Permalink

    Sam’s claims to be preventing hoarding.

    It seems a few shoppers might be speculating that bags of rice are going to be of greater value then the dollars originally paid for them. Stock up now and sell for a profit later as the global food crisis worsens.

    Those darn speculators! Let’s tax the re-selling rice at a profit!

    I think we can blaim this on Big Rice. Those Big Rice companies are manipulating the price of rice to earn greater profits. Didn’t one of Dick Cheney’s college roomates go into the rice business?

    Time for a senate investigation requiring the CEO’s of rice companies to testify why it is that rice is going up.

  99. kansasdem
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 12:04 pm | Permalink

    Are the right wing radio nuts eating their own? Or are they — Laura O’Ingram, Rush O’Limbaugh, Sean O’Hannity — just plain out of touch with reality? O’Limbaugh is goading his dittoheads to riot in Denver? O’Ingram is attacking McCain for telling North Carolina Republican zealots to cease and desist from race baiting? So much for America being a post-racist society.

  100. Phantom
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 12:33 pm | Permalink

    Maybe Condolezza’s behind this one!

  101. Phantom
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 12:34 pm | Permalink

    Do ‘Rice Rockets’, really burn rice!

  102. outlander
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 12:38 pm | Permalink

    “O’Ingram is attacking McCain for telling North Carolina Republican zealots to cease and desist from race baiting? So much for America being a post-racist society.”

    ——————

    Makes McCain look very moderate and very electable.

  103. CF2K
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 12:48 pm | Permalink

    P-Mom,

    Here’s the about Rush Limbaugh, pederast:

    http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/38192/

    Rush apparently loves him some child sex in the Dominican Republic.

  104. CF2K
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 12:49 pm | Permalink

    outlander,

    Makes McCain look like a hypocrite to normal folks, and a sellout to the Wingnuts.

  105. Nathaniel
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 1:19 pm | Permalink

    CF2K,

    The only Hypocrite here is you.

    First you cry about attacks on Al Gore and then you turn around and spread attacks on Rush Limbaugh.

  106. Nathaniel
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 1:22 pm | Permalink

    You Liberals never cease to amaze me.

    You will ignore and question the evidence we have of Iranian involvement in arming those people killing our troops in Iraq, but then turn around and think there is a food crisis because a couple of Sams Clubs and Costco’s are limiting the sale of 20 lb bags of rice.

  107. SolDevVB
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 1:27 pm | Permalink

    Just for laughs.

    JACK (age 3) was watching his Mom breast-feeding his new baby sister. After a while he asked: ‘Mom, why have you got two? Is one for hot and one for cold milk?’

    MELANIE (age 5) asked her Granny how old she was. Granny replied she was so old she didn’t remember any more. Melanie said, ‘If you don’t remember you must look in the back of your panties. Mine say five to six.’

    STEVEN (age 3) hugged and kissed his Mom goodnight. ‘I love you so much, that when you die I’m going to bury you outside my bedroom window.’

    BRITTANY (age 4) had an earache and wanted a painkiller. She tried in vain to take the lid off the bottle. Seeing her frustration, her Mom explained it was a childproof cap and she’d have to open it for her. Eyes wide with wonder, the little girl asked: ‘How does it know it’s me?’

    SUSAN (age 4) was drinking juice when she got the hiccups. ‘Please don’t give me this juice again,’ she said, ‘It makes my teeth cough.’

    D.I. (age 4) stepped onto the bathroom scale and asked: ‘How much do I cost?’

    MARC (age 4) was engrossed in a young couple that were hugging and kissing in a restaurant. Without taking his eyes off them, he asked his dad: ‘Why is he whispering in her mouth?’

    CLINTON (age 5) was in his bedroom looking worried. When his Mom asked what was troubling him, he replied, ‘I don’t know what’ll happen with this bed when I get married. How will my wife fit in?’

    JAMES (age 4) was listening to a Bible story. His dad read: ‘The man named Lot was warned to take his wife and flee out of the city but his wife looked back and was turned to salt Concerned, James asked: ‘What happened to the flea?’

    TAMMY (age 4) was with her mother when they met an elderly, rather wrinkled woman her Mom knew. Tammy looked at her for a while and then asked, ‘Why doesn’t your skin fit your face?’

    The Sermon: I think this Mom will never forget this particular Sunday sermon…
    ‘Dear Lord,’ the minister began, with arms extended toward heaven and a rapturous look on his upturned face. ‘Without you, we are but dust.’ He would have continued but at that moment my very obedient daughter (who was listening!) leaned over to me and asked quite audibly in her shrill little girl voice, ‘Mom, what is butt dust?

  108. StevenEDavis
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 1:43 pm | Permalink

    StevenEDavis
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 1:40 pm | Permalink
    Regular
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 12:42 am | Permalink
    “I saw those photos of Chas in the robe. That was the worst robe I’ve ever seen. Looked like it hadn’t been to the cleaners in years. Chas probably bought it used at one of those thrift shops and put it on to claim he’s a minister.”

    Just to set the record straight – a full time job around this place, unfortunately. I showed those photos to James at the request of Chas.

    James’s characterization of Chas’s attire is inaccurate – to put it in the kindest terms.

    James,
    I sure wish I understood your needs to make up stuff. Care to appear to be a man and admit that you were just flaming?

  109. Posted April 25, 2008 at 1:55 pm | Permalink

    JAMES (age 4) was listening to a Bible story. His dad read: ‘The man named Lot was warned to take his wife and flee out of the city but his wife looked back and was turned to salt Concerned, James asked: ‘What happened to the flea?’

    James’ Dad said:Son, you dont understand. That isnt what I said.

    JAMES (age4) But Dad you said the man waas warned to take his wife and flea out of the city! I heard you say that. Now you lie to me and say you didnt say that!

    James’ Dad said: Son I didnt lie to you! You just dont understand. Flee means “leave”

    James (age 4) C’mon Dad, I have spent time with Rover, I know what a flea is, and it doesnt leave unless you and mom spray Rover with that smelly stuff. You’re just lying how Dad to make me think you know what you are talking about!

    James’ Dad said: Son, I am NOT lying to you. You just refuse to hear what I am telling you. They used different words back then. We really need to change these words so everybody can understand them.

    Oh well, another kid brought up by lying liberal parents who just want to change the Bible and God to fit their own needs!!

    /satire off

  110. Monkeyhawk
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 1:59 pm | Permalink

    And you, “Nathaniel,” never cease to amaze me me with your willful ignorance.

    You start with –

    “You will ignore and question the evidence we have of Iranian involvement in arming those people killing our troops in Iraq…”

    Uhm, “Nethaniel?” The issue is that George WMD Bush has put our troops in the midddle of a Shi-ite/Sun’ni civil war. Iran isn’t “killing our troops in Iraq,” they’re trying to kill Sun’nis in Iraq and Srub put our troops in the crossfire. And John W McCain wants it to continue for a hundred years.

    But then, the brilliant mind (which might not be severely injured as are 1 in 3 Iraqi veterans) of “Nathaniel” adds –

    “…then turn around and think there is a food crisis because a couple of Sams Clubs and Costco’s are limiting the sale of 20 lb bags of rice.”

    Since you haven’t been paying attention, “Nathaniel,” look up on the rice shortatges, inflating prices, and food riots in Asia and Africa. (You know, places that eat a lot of rice?)

    Sam’s (Wal-Mart) and CostCo are limiting sales because they are afraid overseas supplies might dry up.

    Oh, and Australia’s last four rice crops have been wiped out by drought many attribute to climate change.

  111. Nathaniel
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 2:28 pm | Permalink

    Steven,

    To take a page from your book…

    Who are you to say that Regular is wrong? It could be just his opinion on how Chas looked in those Robes.

    A subjective opinion at that and not neccissarily his making things up!

    Perhaps that is really the way Chas looked to Regular after all.

    LOL

    Why don’t you let me take a look at those photos so I can see for myself?

  112. Hud
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 2:46 pm | Permalink

    “Care to appear to be a man and admit that you were just flaming?”

    Funny, disagree with Chas and you are called all kinds of names.

    Funnier still, I have never seen where he admitted to be just “Flaming”. Yeah, I heard Chas is just expressing his opinion, several times in lower and upper case.

    So where is you statement to Chas to “admit”.

  113. Posted April 25, 2008 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    Care to share who posted this >>>

    “Care to appear to be a man and admit that you were just flaming?”

    Hmmmm??

  114. Regular
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 2:52 pm | Permalink

    #
    StevenEDavis
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 1:43 pm | Permalink

    StevenEDavis
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 1:40 pm | Permalink
    Regular
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 12:42 am | Permalink
    “I saw those photos of Chas in the robe. That was the worst robe I’ve ever seen. Looked like it hadn’t been to the cleaners in years. Chas probably bought it used at one of those thrift shops and put it on to claim he’s a minister.”

    Just to set the record straight – a full time job around this place, unfortunately. I showed those photos to James at the request of Chas.

    James’s characterization of Chas’s attire is inaccurate – to put it in the kindest terms.

    James,
    I sure wish I understood your needs to make up stuff. Care to appear to be a man and admit that you were just flaming?
    ————————————-

    The robe looked well worn and unclean to me. I didn’t make it up.

    Care to be a man and tell Chas what a low life he is?

    Or perhaps J R, when he attacks others and talks about their wife or ex-wives and the lies he constantly posts about other posters?

    Do you want to be man and tell J R to stop his personal attacks?

    ————————————-
    Chas
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 1:15 am

    James, the crippled fool!!! Yep thats what you are!!
    ————————————–

    How about it Steve Davis?

    You going to be a man and be more concerned about a robe or the constant personal attacks your Lib “friends” invoke on others?

  115. Posted April 25, 2008 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    Chas
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 1:15 am

    James, the crippled fool!!! Yep thats what you are!!
    ==============================

    Problem James — YOU have gone to great lengths to tell the entire WORLD how crippled up you are… And now you act the role of the Fool… And you call that an attack??? By whom?? By YOU perhaps???

    Footnote — The robe is a bit long in years… however, my congregations have it cleaned monthly… it’s part of what is done… But I wont expect any apologies…

  116. Hud
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 3:05 pm | Permalink

    YOU have gone to great lengths to tell the entire WORLD how a stroke has crippled you… And now you act the role of the Fool… And you call that an attack??? By whom?? By YOU perhaps???

  117. Predestined
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 3:08 pm | Permalink

    Your post of 11:03 am, what spam?

    Boxlock,

    SPAM: I believe it’s been mentioned before, and also Tara mentioned it upthread. It seems to happen on older threads the most, not current ones, but then I don’t go back and read the old stuff. Sorry, but I don’t have all day to watch and read each post as it comes in, nor is there time to read old threads. Work calls, and I answer. Put in a more relative way: The WEBlog is not my life.

    Now you know why my posts are sporadic, at best, and often follow one another.

  118. Regular
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    #
    Chas
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    Chas
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 1:15 am

    James, the crippled fool!!! Yep thats what you are!!
    ==============================

    Problem James — YOU have gone to great lengths to tell the entire WORLD how crippled up you are… And now you act the role of the Fool… And you call that an attack??? By whom?? By YOU perhaps???

    Footnote — The robe is a bit long in years… however, my congregations have it cleaned monthly… it’s part of what is done… But I wont expect any apologies…
    ———————————-

    So you see Steven Davis, my assessment was correct on both parts brought for by Chas and previously described by me.

    Be a man.

  119. Regular
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

    brought for = brought forth

  120. Nathaniel
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 3:12 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    I see your stroke is selectively making you hit the CAPS LOCK button again on cue with typing the word “you.”

    LOL

  121. Predestined
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 3:21 pm | Permalink

    Glad to see you have a sense of humor (cough cough)

    Sol, I was smiling as I typed. Should’ve added the :) so you’d know. ;)

  122. Posted April 25, 2008 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    Nathan conveeeeniently forgets that typing the word “you” doesnt use any fingers of the Left hand. Oh well, I suppose he is fully entitled to his opinion. :-D

  123. Nathaniel
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 3:27 pm | Permalink

    Chas,

    Oh… So you do choose to type in caps sometimes?

  124. Posted April 25, 2008 at 3:28 pm | Permalink

    “So you see Steven Davis, my assessment was correct on both parts brought for by Chas and previously described by me.” [James]

    That statement makes no sense, James. None at all!

  125. Predestined
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 3:29 pm | Permalink

    You Liberals never cease to amaze me.

    Ding! Ding! Ding! (I love it when the cons say “you people”.)

    Nathaniel,

    The topic discussed was food crisis. Although most people aren’t going to buy 100 lbs of rice at one time, there must be at least a few who do. Daycare providers, maybe? Churches? Boy Scout troops for a money raising dinner?

    So what’s your preferred topic of discussion? Oh, wait, I know that one! Guns, followed by your interpretation of God and the Bible.

    Carry on, my good man. (That was TIC)

  126. Predestined
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 3:30 pm | Permalink

    Starting in rather early today, aren’t you boys?

  127. Posted April 25, 2008 at 3:32 pm | Permalink

    BTW, not that it matters to any of you folks, but it is Not a robe — It is a vestment. Choirs wear robes. Just thought I would point that out. Additionally, vestments are not items that are often re-placed. Mended, repaired, or something of that sort, yes, but not very often re-placed. There is a reason for it, but most of you would not comprehend it, and I wont subject it to your typical sacrilege.

  128. StevenEDavis
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 3:38 pm | Permalink

    “How about it Steve Davis?

    “You going to be a man and be more concerned about a robe or the constant personal attacks your Lib “friends” invoke on others?”

    James, I know you are not that stupid. You are missing the point entirely. My point was that it is not a respectable practice to make stuff up. And I think that you are with it enough to know that the only person’s behavior I am responsible for, is my own. I fail sometimes. But I do try to do better.

    Stuff someone should have taught you, James:

    1) two wrongs do not make a right
    2) be the change you want to see in the world.

    Guess I got the answer to my question, huh? Very disappointing.

  129. Regular
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 4:05 pm | Permalink

    #
    StevenEDavis
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 3:38 pm | Permalink

    “How about it Steve Davis?

    “You going to be a man and be more concerned about a robe or the constant personal attacks your Lib “friends” invoke on others?”

    James, I know you are not that stupid. You are missing the point entirely. My point was that it is not a respectable practice to make stuff up. And I think that you are with it enough to know that the only person’s behavior I am responsible for, is my own. I fail sometimes. But I do try to do better.

    Stuff someone should have taught you, James:

    1) two wrongs do not make a right
    2) be the change you want to see in the world.

    Guess I got the answer to my question, huh? Very disappointing.
    ————————–

    Steven Davis,

    Perhaps you missed the post by Chas.

    Footnote — The robe is a bit long in years…

    It appears I was correct in my assessment.

    So it appears Steven, you are more interested in uni-directional finger pointing that actually stating the truth about your Lib friends.

    Be a man.

  130. ksgrm
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

    CF Just got back and saw your responses:

    I repeat Scalia said: Not me – Scalia. Not your timeline – Scalia.

    “”I say nonsense,” Scalia responds to Stahl’s observation that people say the Supreme Court’s decision in Gore v. Bush was based on politics and not justice. “Get over it. It’s so old by now. The principal issue in the case, whether the scheme that the Florida Supreme Court had put together violated the federal Constitution, that wasn’t even close. The vote was seven to two,” he says, referring to the Supreme Court’s decision that the Supreme Court of Florida’s method for recounting ballots was unconstitutional.

    Furthermore, says the outspoken conservative justice, it was Al Gore who ultimately put the issue into the courts. “It was Al Gore who made it a judicial question…. We didn’t go looking for trouble. It was he who said, ‘I want this to be decided by the courts,’” says Scalia. “What are we supposed to say — ‘Not important enough?’” he jokes.”

    Gore made it a judicial matter – not Bush, not me, not the Florida election board, which was ran by the democrats – but Gore.

    Get over it.

  131. StevenEDavis
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    “Why don’t you let me take a look at those photos so I can see for myself?”

    Given that I get Chas’s permission and you provide me with an email address, I could forward them to you.

    The appearance of robe or vestment was not the only objection I had to his comments. There was this little bit of flaming, too: “Chas probably bought it used at one of those thrift shops and put it on to claim he’s a minister.”

    I hope that you are not so stupid, as to think flaming and stating an opinion are the same thing. Even you, should be able to see the difference.

  132. lindainks55
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 4:47 pm | Permalink

    Steven, I still admire you for doing the right thing. You are truly a good man. Don’t let this change you.

    The other day I asked, “why does someone always need to be wrong?”

    What I was really questioning is why do arguments go onandon in an attempt to make someone right and someone wrong? And usually on topics that don’t make a hill of beans of difference.

  133. Regular
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 5:03 pm | Permalink

    StevenEDavis
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    “Why don’t you let me take a look at those photos so I can see for myself?”

    Given that I get Chas’s permission and you provide me with an email address, I could forward them to you.

    The appearance of robe or vestment was not the only objection I had to his comments. There was this little bit of flaming, too: “Chas probably bought it used at one of those thrift shops and put it on to claim he’s a minister.”

    I hope that you are not so stupid, as to think flaming and stating an opinion are the same thing. Even you, should be able to see the difference.
    ——————————–

    Have you seen Chas personally in a church anywhere.

    Can you vouch with 100 percent certainty that Chas is an ordained Minister?

    Have you seen his registration at the courthouse or in a Church book of Ordination? They do make those you know, I found my Uncle listed.

    Chas is hiding something. Perhaps that he is a poor excuse of a Minister(by his conduct here on the blog) or perhaps he never has been or will be an ordained Minister.

    Unless he steps up and proves it, provides a public source, the doubt will always be there.

    If I’m wrong and absolute proof is provided, I’ll apologize.

    But, I have strong suspicions about Chas. Perhaps he was defrocked? I dunno, I remain doubtful.

  134. ksgrm
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 5:05 pm | Permalink

    Steven you are absolutely right and two wrongs don’t make a right.

    Regular no matter how stupid the remarks in Chas posts you shouldn’t sink to his level. You are above that.

    But Steven where is your reproach to Chas for the way he denigrates others poster continually. The names he calls me are totally uncalled for and so is his way of trying to belittle anyone he doesn’t agree with. Nothing of substance in his posts – Just you are wrong because you are stupid, ignorant, your reading comprehension is bad, etc… His constant lies and exaggerations are ridiculous.

    Does your concern not run in both directions?

  135. Regular
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 5:11 pm | Permalink

    Sister ksgrm,

    You are correct.

    I’ll lay off the ad hominem on Chas.

    I don’t need to repeat his mistakes.

  136. JMWalker
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 5:23 pm | Permalink

    This is just ridiculous. Talk about rats deserting a sinking ship. And the self-righteous right has the audacity to call us surrender monkeys! Good grief, Powell was left out in the cold by a moronic administration bent on going to war, whatever the cost, including hanging a true war hero out to dry. For confirmation, just look at the Pat Tillman fiasco.

    Does anybody else see the complete lack of responsibility this administration has shown in the last 7+ years? Jesus wept.

    ===============================================

    The man who led the office that supplied the Bush Administration with “raw intelligence” on Iraq now says everyone else is to blame but himself.

    Douglas Feith, President Bush’s former Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, headed the Office of Special Plans, a secretive outfit which passed along unverified “alternative” intelligence to Administration decisionmakers in the run up to war.

    A Senate Intelligence Committee report found that the Office “developed, produced, and then disseminated alternative intelligence assessments on the Iraq and al Qaida relationship, which included some conclusions that were inconsistent with the consensus of the Intelligence Community, to senior decision-makers.”

    In other words, they passed on “intelligence” that was never vetted, much of which appeared to align with a hawkish Administration agenda.

    On Thursday, Feith pointed his finger at everyone but himself regarding the war in Iraq. According to the Washington Post’s Dana Milbank, at a book-launch party for his new book, “War and Decision: Inside the Pentagon at the Dawn of the War on Terrorism,” Feith blamed a laundry list of officials for failing “to challenge the logic of going to war.”

    http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Feith_says_Iraq_war_not_my_0425.html

  137. Regular
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 5:26 pm | Permalink

    Yo J M Walker,

    Bush was briefed daily by a Clinton appointed head of the CIA.

    He should have gotten up to date and accurate information right? :)

  138. JMWalker
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 5:29 pm | Permalink

    The Office of Special Plans! Wow, what an intelligent idea! Gather all the intelligence one can, cherry pick what fits your “special plans”, then pass it off to a morally bankrupt congress, a lazy, money-mad news bureau, and start a war at your convenience. Amazing.

    ==================================================

    The Office of Special Plans (OSP), which existed from September 2002 to June 2003, was a Pentagon unit created by Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith, and headed by Feith, as charged by then-U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, to supply senior Bush administration officials with raw intelligence (unvetted by intelligence analysts, see Stovepiping) pertaining to Iraq.[1] An allegedly-similar unit, called the Iranian Directorate, was created several years later, in 2006, to deal with intelligence on Iran.[2]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Special_Plans

  139. ksgrm
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 5:32 pm | Permalink

    Jm I would be much more impressed with this revelation if the man wasn’t hawking a book. It amazes me how many memories are jarred to the realities when writing a book are concerned.

  140. JMWalker
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 5:34 pm | Permalink

    #
    Regular
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 5:26 pm | Permalink

    Yo J M Walker,

    Bush was briefed daily by a Clinton appointed head of the CIA.

    He should have gotten up to date and accurate information right? :)
    ===============================================
    What was this “Clinton appointee” fed, and who was feeding him, Paul Wolfowitz or Douglas Feith? Get real, Regular, this one IS a smoking gun, and brings to light just how corrupt this administration is. the OSP was the main planning stage for the war in Iraq, and used nonvetted info; something NO intelligent, responsible President would do. And what does that leave? Bushco.

  141. JMWalker
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 5:36 pm | Permalink

    #
    ksgrm
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 5:32 pm | Permalink

    Jm I would be much more impressed with this revelation if the man wasn’t hawking a book. It amazes me how many memories are jarred to the realities when writing a book are concerned.
    ===============================================

    His book and the bs going with it is not the point. The point is his falling off the bushbus, as so many of ex bushco’s have done. Really sick pattern here.

  142. ksgrm
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 5:40 pm | Permalink

    JM what I see here is a man who claims that he was cherry picking intel to give to the prez so he could start an unjustified war and all of a sudden when the writing bug bit him he got a consience and decided to tell the world “I was a low life that kept my mouth shut and allowed a nation to go to war but now I have to tell all about it and am writing a book (wink, wink) that you can buy to hear all about it.”

    Yep I believe that man.

  143. Regular
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 5:43 pm | Permalink

    This from a special committee by the United States Senate Intelligence Committee (which has Democrats in it btw)

    http://rpc.senate.gov/_files/Feb0706DoDIntellMS.pdf

    It appears that J M Walker is repeating unsubstantiated swill that has no foundation and even refuted by a CIA investigation.

    September 22, 2005: Senator Levin repeated the same allegation of deception in his letter to
    the Department of Defense Inspector General. Senator Levin asserted that DOD “sent to
    several congressional committees in January 2004 revised ORCON materials that were
    represented as containing the CIA’s requested changes to the October 2003 documents, but
    which did not fully and accurately reflect the CIA’s requested changes,” and he asked if this
    constituted “mislead[ing] Congress.”40
    • Thus, Senator Levin repeated a serious charge, the factual basis of which the CIA had
    undercut nearly a year before.

    At the July 9, 2004, press conference for the public release of the SSCI report, Senator
    Rockefeller asked whether “the number three guy in the Defense Department, Douglas Feith,
    . . .was he running a private intelligence failure [sic – the Senator presumably meant
    operation], which is not lawful.”
    • In response, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Legislative Affairs wrote to Senator
    Rockefeller asking him to provide “evidence supporting the serious charge, . . . [or] a
    retraction and apology would be appropriate.”41
    • To this day, Senator Rockefeller has not provided any evidence for the charge, has not
    apologized for it, but has not abandoned it.
    o SSCI Chairman Pat Roberts summarized the situation: “The Committee is concerned
    about persistent and, to date, unsubstantiated allegations that there was something
    unlawful or improper about the activities of the Office of Special Plans within the
    office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. . . . I have not discovered any
    credible evidence of unlawful or improper activity, yet the allegations persist.”42

    • To this day, Senator Levin has yet to retract, or apologize for his allegation against Mr. Feith,
    which the CIA long ago exposed as having no foundation.

    The entire PDF can be read at the link provided above.

  144. JMWalker
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 5:45 pm | Permalink

    If this turns out to be true, and I honestly hope it isn’t, Cheney, again, would show his true color as an enemy of this country.

    ==================================================
    “Everything I’m hearing from my own sources in Washington is that what you have now is a kind of push back by Vice-President [Dick] Cheney and his office and other hardliners who are opposed to diplomatic dealings with North Korea,” he said.

    “[They are] hoping that by making public these allegations of nuclear cooperation it will torpedo the diplomatic process.”

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/04/25/2227483.htm?section=world

  145. JMWalker
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 5:52 pm | Permalink

    Apparently, Regular insists on believing the words coming out of the mouths of this administration. So be it: To believe in the lies of the corrupt is to accept corruption, and nothing portrays that better than this administration.

    “Despite extensive planning by the U.S. Department of State’s Future of Iraq Project to deal with post-Saddam chaos, much of which (including museum looting and extensive water and power shortages) was fully anticipated and provided for in those plans, these plans were simply set aside by Rumsfeld. [1].

    “Air Force Lt. Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski, who worked in the Pentagon until her retirement, was with the Office of Special Plans: ‘What I saw was aberrant, pervasive and contrary to good order and discipline,’ Kwiatkowski wrote recently. ‘If one is seeking the answers to why peculiar bits of ‘intelligence’ found sanctity in a presidential speech, or why the post-Saddam occupation has been distinguished by confusion and false steps, one need look no further than the process inside the Office of the Secretary of Defense.’ She described the activities of Rumsfeld’s Office of Special Plans as, ‘A subversion of constitutional limits on executive power and a co-optation through deceit of a large segment of the Congress.’ [2].

    In July 2003, “due to ever increasing criticism about the role OSP has played in the gathering of intelligence and the conclusions made to justify the war with Iraq, the Pentagon changed the name of OSP back to its original name, Northern Gulf Affairs Office.” [3].

    Julian Borger, in his July 17, 2003 article “The spies who pushed for war,” published by the Guardian/UK, writes that Democratic congressman David Obey said concerning the OSP: “‘The office was charged with collecting, vetting and disseminating intelligence completely outside of the normal intelligence apparatus. In fact, it appears that information collected by this office was in some instances not even shared with established intelligence agencies and in numerous instances was passed on to the National Security Council and the president without having been vetted with anyone other than political appointees’.” [4]

    On March 9, 2004, Los Angeles Times’ staff reporter Greg Miller writes that during testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, George J. Tenet, Director of the CIA, revealed that “A special intelligence unit at the Pentagon provided private prewar briefings to senior White House officials on alleged ties between Iraq and Al Qaeda without the knowledge of [the] CIA Director … [and the] disclosure suggests that a controversial Pentagon office played a greater role than previously understood in shaping the administration’s views on Iraq’s alleged ties to the terrorist network behind the Sept. 11 attacks, and that it bypassed usual channels to make a case that conflicted with the conclusions of CIA analysts.” [5]

    In her 4-page article “The New Pentagon Papers” published March 10, 2004, by Salon, Karen Kwiatkowski, “reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war.” [6]

    http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Office_of_Special_Plans

  146. Regular
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 6:04 pm | Permalink

    Oh J M Walker, I read that website you just posted as well and categorized it as Internet trash.

    The report I gave you is from the United States Senate where people can go to prison for lying if they don’t report the truth as the facts state.

    Not only did an CIA evidence refute the allegations made; Senator Rockefeller and Levin have TO DATE UNABLE TO COME UP WITH ANY EVIDENCE THAT CONFIRMS THEIR ALLEGATIONS.

    There, I did a Chas.

    Was that clear enough for you J M Walker?

    Two U.S. Senators on the Democratic side of the house have yet to come up with any evidence on the allegation you now claim is made by some ‘book writer.’

    Senate investigation or some writer who sold out to the higher bidder in a publishing war – who ya gonna believe J M Walker?

    Don’t tell me, I already know the answer and that answer is a sad one – it is sad in that it measures the content of your character J M Walker.

  147. JMWalker
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 6:33 pm | Permalink

    Oh, Regular, with over 5 million white house emails missing (wink . . . wink), how could one prove anything with this administration?

    I also stated congress was a willing partner in looking the other way during the whole fiasco leading up to the war. So just how the hell can that same congress come to any other conclusion? If congress had found against the white house and the CIA, they would have been shooting themselves in the foot. And, gee, that might mean they wouldn’t get reelected. So who are you going to believe, Regular, a corrupt congress bent on getting reelected, or people who were there during this OSP fiasco?

    To quote, “Don’t tell me, I already know the answer and that answer is a sad one – it is sad in that it measures the content of your character Regular.”

    And you STILL don’t understand why I brought up Douglas Feith’s denials in the first place, so how can you understand anything else brought up here? It had nothing to do with his denials, OSP or his freakin’ book; it had everything to do with how this administration backstabs its own appointees, then cries foul when the appointees bite back. Or how about just the corrupt ones?
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/132173/25-Most-Corrupt-Officials-in-the-Bush-Administration

    “You can’t erase e-mails, not today,” said Leahy, D-Vermont. “They’ve gone through too many servers. They can’t say they’ve been lost. That’s like saying, ‘The dog ate my homework.’ ”
    http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/04/13/white.house.email/index.html

  148. JMWalker
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 6:37 pm | Permalink

    I will now be referring to the Bush administration as, “The dog ate my homework.”

  149. Regular
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 6:55 pm | Permalink

    Emails eh?

    You want me to bring back those articles on how the Clinton and Gore administration lost millions of emails as well?

    It’s still sad that you believe in Internet trash, instead of a Senate Intelligence Committee finding.

    As I said, if the people lie in the Senate, they go to prison or at the very least will be admonished by the entire Senate.

    So tell me J M Walker, on this particular subject, has that occurred? The answer is of course, no.

  150. JMWalker
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 8:21 pm | Permalink

    If the senate is corrupt, as I believe it is now, regardless of political party, than a so called senate intelligence committee hearing smacks of a conundrum, doesn’t it. But being as you have a tendency to ask and answer your own questions, I would guess that’s the world you choose to live in: any other answer is beyond your comprehension.

  151. BlueJay
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 8:41 pm | Permalink

    James

    This time in the part of “Regular” says:

    “Or perhaps J R, when he attacks others and talks about their wife or ex-wives and the lies he constantly posts about other posters?”

    I have never lied here. If you can prove otherwise I invite you to do so.

    “Tip to “peace” loving war protesters: Avoid assaulting people in wheelchairs.
    ——————————————

    Sounds like something J R would do.”

    I HAVE said I would not hesitate to kick your wrist canes out from under you. But that’s just because you are a despicable person who has threatened to kill me.

    “The robe looked well worn and unclean to me. I didn’t make it up.”

    YOU’VE room to talk.

    Now out of deference to my friend Steven, I chose not to meet you.

    For fear Nathan might make trouble.

    But I HAVE seen ya James.

    You look like a member of ZZ Top that fell through a garbage dump. I should imagine there is an odor I would find nauseating.

  152. HerbertWestIII
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 10:41 pm | Permalink

    Thanks writerdog. Herbert west III west.herb@yahoo.com

  153. StevenEDavis
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 11:29 pm | Permalink

    Regular:
    “But, I have strong suspicions about Chas. Perhaps he was defrocked? I dunno, I remain doubtful.”

    Ksgrm:
    “Nothing of substance in his posts – Just you are wrong because you are stupid, ignorant, your reading comprehension is bad, etc… His constant lies and exaggerations are ridiculous.

    “Does your concern not run in both directions?”

    First, of course it does, grm.

    I got an email sent to me by Chas, that had a .pdf attachment with his vita and several church ratings on it. It looked ligit to me, but I do confess I am not an expert on such things.

    He does appear to do part-time church business as necessitated by his health concerns.

    I believe what he says about his business. It is okay with me, if you don’t. I am fairly sure if Christ himself showed up and told you something other than what you wanted to believe, you would not accept it.

    Night.

  154. Posted April 25, 2008 at 11:52 pm | Permalink

    “This is for WS who was throwing Scalias name around as being against the Bush v Gore decision.”

    If you are going to accuse me of something, please make sure that it is me that posted whatever comment that offended you.

    For the record, Grm, I never posted anything about Scalia and the Bush v. the World Decision.

    But nice try. As I have asked before, please try to use actual facts when you post.

  155. Posted April 26, 2008 at 12:25 am | Permalink

    Good night; Good luck;
    God Bless – Whatever you conceive God to be!!

    Blessings ALL!!

  156. Regular
    Posted April 26, 2008 at 12:25 am | Permalink

    #
    StevenEDavis
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 11:29 pm | Permalink

    Regular:
    “But, I have strong suspicions about Chas. Perhaps he was defrocked? I dunno, I remain doubtful.”

    Ksgrm:
    “Nothing of substance in his posts – Just you are wrong because you are stupid, ignorant, your reading comprehension is bad, etc… His constant lies and exaggerations are ridiculous.

    “Does your concern not run in both directions?”

    First, of course it does, grm.

    I got an email sent to me by Chas, that had a .pdf attachment with his vita and several church ratings on it. It looked ligit to me, but I do confess I am not an expert on such things.

    He does appear to do part-time church business as necessitated by his health concerns.

    I believe what he says about his business. It is okay with me, if you don’t. I am fairly sure if Christ himself showed up and told you something other than what you wanted to believe, you would not accept it.

    Night.
    ——————————-

    All ordained Minister have to be listed. All one has to do is go to where Marriage Licenses are issued in the courthouse and check to see if they are listed. There is a collection of books, (probably computerized now,) that has a list of ordained Ministers which are authorized by States to marry people.

    I found this out by accident when my cousin got married and my cousin couldn’t remember when his father (my uncle) was ordained, so the Clerk looked it up.

    I have another cousin, coincidentally named Charles, who was a “Captain” in the Salvation Army. I’m sure he has a rather lengthy PDF to provide as well. But he wasn’t an ordained Minister, just a very hard worker for the Salvation Army that did the work of the Lord.

    Knowledge is good.

  157. Posted April 26, 2008 at 12:42 am | Permalink

    Your schtick is getting real old, McCluer. You accuse Chas of lying about his status as a minister, yet you have clearly lied about your status as a veteran (Viet Nam) your marital status (your wife left you) and your nics (only used one) and your being JM (I am not JM!.)

    You have zero credibility, since so many of your lies have been exposed, yet you have the gall to accuse Chas.

    What a liar you are, McCluer.

  158. Regular
    Posted April 26, 2008 at 12:48 am | Permalink

    You don’t get to know the personal aspects of my life Clark. That’s the way it is, period.

    Chas uses his profession like a sledgehammer exercising some sort of “moral authority” over others. I just want him to prove his claim.

    Ask Steven Davis about my veteran status, I showed him my retired military ID card.

    That’s none of your business either Clark. I don’t go around claiming to being an expert on military matters either. I do have broad based experience and will call things like I see them. That’s called opinion.

    The problem with people like you Clark, is that you can’t be trusted with personal information. You use it and abuse it in your daily attacks on posters.

    That’s your problem Clark, no one trusts you and because of your conduct here, you can never be trusted.

  159. Posted April 26, 2008 at 12:52 am | Permalink

    Uh oh — meltdown in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1…..

  160. Posted April 26, 2008 at 12:55 am | Permalink

    Gee, Military ID card could have been picked up at some thrift store somewhere for a few bucks!

    LOL LOL

  161. Posted April 26, 2008 at 12:57 am | Permalink

    “The problem with people like you Clark, is that you can’t be trusted with personal information.”

    Have you ever been to Mississippi, JM?

    I never ASKED for your personal information – you have posted SEVERAL version of it, however, Mr. McCluer.

    “That’s none of your business either Clark.”

    So why do you claim to be a ‘Nam vet one day and then claim to have been too young for ‘Nam the next?

    “That’s your problem Clark, no one trusts you and because of your conduct here, you can never be trusted.”

    That is funny, JM.

    “You don’t get to know the personal aspects of my life Clark.”

    I cannot imagine anything more horrifying than knowing the personal aspects of your life, McCluer – my only issue is your credibility and why you lie about the “personal aspects” of your life?

    “You use it and abuse it in your daily attacks on posters.”

    Using your own words to point out your hypocrisy is not a “daily attack on posters.” It is just showing one know-it-all poster to be the fraud that he is.

    So, McCluer, why are you such a liar?

  162. Posted April 26, 2008 at 12:58 am | Permalink

    Regular
    Posted April 26, 2008 at 12:48 am | Permalink
    You don’t get to know the personal aspects of my life Clark. That’s the way it is, period.
    ========================

    Yet, you demand to know My personal information?

    Hypocrite!!

  163. Posted April 26, 2008 at 1:17 am | Permalink

    “That’s your problem Clark, no one trusts you and because of your conduct here, you can never be trusted.”

    This is from a guy that openly LIES about himself, his experiences and his life.

    What a joke?

    What a joke!

    Hey, McCluer, how was Mississippi?

2 Trackbacks

  1. [...] One Man Army wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptThe issue is that George WMD Bush has put our troops in the midddle of a Shi-ite/Sun’ni civil war. Iran isn’t “killing our troops in Iraq,” they’re trying to kill Sun’nis in Iraq and Srub put our troops in the crossfire. … [...]

  2. [...] Jim wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptA man heckling First Lady Laura Bush and daughter Jenna outside the 92nd Street Y was arrested after he punched a wheelchair-bound girl whose parents had told him to shut up, authorities said Wednesday. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0 … [...]