<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open thread 4/10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329662</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329662</guid>
		<description>And the ONE post Chas makes all day, is an ad hominem attack on Max.

Your contributions are noteworthy Chas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the ONE post Chas makes all day, is an ad hominem attack on Max.</p>
<p>Your contributions are noteworthy Chas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329661</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329661</guid>
		<description>Chas.
Posted April 10, 2008 at 3:18 pm &#124; Permalink
WOW, looks like Max has diahrrea of the keyboard today!! Mercy sakes!!
-------------------------------------------------

Max
Posted April 10, 2008 at 6:55 pm &#124; Permalink
Looks like Chas has his head up his ass again.
-------------------------------------------------

Chas.
Posted April 10, 2008 at 11:42 pm &#124; Permalink
Gosh Max, I make one post all day, and all you can find is to shoot back with your usual ad hominem, bull crap??? Really great, there, Max!!
-------------------------------------------------

Can you possibly make yourself a bigger Hypocrite Chas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chas.<br />
Posted April 10, 2008 at 3:18 pm | Permalink<br />
WOW, looks like Max has diahrrea of the keyboard today!! Mercy sakes!!<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Max<br />
Posted April 10, 2008 at 6:55 pm | Permalink<br />
Looks like Chas has his head up his ass again.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Chas.<br />
Posted April 10, 2008 at 11:42 pm | Permalink<br />
Gosh Max, I make one post all day, and all you can find is to shoot back with your usual ad hominem, bull crap??? Really great, there, Max!!<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Can you possibly make yourself a bigger Hypocrite Chas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regular</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329562</link>
		<dc:creator>Regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 07:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329562</guid>
		<description>The commercial/trash posts are trackbacks.  They can be eliminated by the Blog Owner, by not allowing trackbacks or at least filtering the trackbacks the same one would the text in the blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The commercial/trash posts are trackbacks.  They can be eliminated by the Blog Owner, by not allowing trackbacks or at least filtering the trackbacks the same one would the text in the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herbert West III/Pub</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329559</link>
		<dc:creator>Herbert West III/Pub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329559</guid>
		<description>TESTING MY REGISTRATION. Herbert West III, west.herb@yahoo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TESTING MY REGISTRATION. Herbert West III, <a href="mailto:west.herb@yahoo.com">west.herb@yahoo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chas.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329556</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 05:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329556</guid>
		<description>Gosh  Max,  I  make one post  all  day,  and  all you  can  find  is  to  shoot  back  with  your  usual  ad hominem,  bull  crap???   Really  great, there,  Max!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh  Max,  I  make one post  all  day,  and  all you  can  find  is  to  shoot  back  with  your  usual  ad hominem,  bull  crap???   Really  great, there,  Max!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chas.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329555</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 05:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329555</guid>
		<description>test</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ANTI</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329531</link>
		<dc:creator>ANTI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329531</guid>
		<description>Huh...that's what I thought, but as I stated I haven't seen any of that yet. That does seem to illuminate a loop-hole in the registration of the blog if that has occurred post-registration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh&#8230;that&#8217;s what I thought, but as I stated I haven&#8217;t seen any of that yet. That does seem to illuminate a loop-hole in the registration of the blog if that has occurred post-registration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329530</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329530</guid>
		<description>The Spam Posters show up - most are porno sites, some are phishing, some are just the "Free Rolex Watches" types.

Garbage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Spam Posters show up - most are porno sites, some are phishing, some are just the &#8220;Free Rolex Watches&#8221; types.</p>
<p>Garbage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ANTI</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329529</link>
		<dc:creator>ANTI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329529</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure what you mean by "spam poster" also I have never seen any of the porn post as I think Max and fleetwood have described, perhaps it is filtered out thru my software- not sure but I have yet to see anything of the sort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what you mean by &#8220;spam poster&#8221; also I have never seen any of the porn post as I think Max and fleetwood have described, perhaps it is filtered out thru my software- not sure but I have yet to see anything of the sort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J R</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329528</link>
		<dc:creator>J R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329528</guid>
		<description>Test</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329527</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329527</guid>
		<description>Parkay - strictly scroll over territory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parkay - strictly scroll over territory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ANTI</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329526</link>
		<dc:creator>ANTI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329526</guid>
		<description>Spam posters- like parkay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spam posters- like parkay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ANTI</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329524</link>
		<dc:creator>ANTI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329524</guid>
		<description>test</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329523</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329523</guid>
		<description>But how do the spam posters still get through?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But how do the spam posters still get through?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329522</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329522</guid>
		<description>Dang, this place has gotten real quiet since they introduced registration. I guess that tells us how many nic switchers and sock puppets were here before.

Funny, some claimed that there were NONE of the above.

Guess they were wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang, this place has gotten real quiet since they introduced registration. I guess that tells us how many nic switchers and sock puppets were here before.</p>
<p>Funny, some claimed that there were NONE of the above.</p>
<p>Guess they were wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American, of the USA</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329520</link>
		<dc:creator>American, of the USA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329520</guid>
		<description>Romans 1
 18 The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20 For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. 

John 3
16 "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son,[a] that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God's one and only Son.[b] 19 This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. 20 Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will be exposed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romans 1<br />
 18 The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20 For since the creation of the world God&#8217;s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. </p>
<p>John 3<br />
16 &#8220;For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son,[a] that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God&#8217;s one and only Son.[b] 19 This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. 20 Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will be exposed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329517</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329517</guid>
		<description>"Nope, Weaver fired first and refused to surrender."

I was wrong, Kevin Harris and SAMMY Weaver fired first, killing a US Marshall.

RANDY Weaver then refused to surrender.

Regardless of your position, killing a U S Marshall is not a good choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Nope, Weaver fired first and refused to surrender.&#8221;</p>
<p>I was wrong, Kevin Harris and SAMMY Weaver fired first, killing a US Marshall.</p>
<p>RANDY Weaver then refused to surrender.</p>
<p>Regardless of your position, killing a U S Marshall is not a good choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Davis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329514</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329514</guid>
		<description>Miguel,
Try this link - go to the bottom of the page.  It was written in January, well before April fools day.  You guys know its conclusions are correct.  That was why we were given a candidate by your party whom the average citizen would want to have a beer with.  What a sad mire of dumbness your party has become.  I am sure Lincoln is turning over in his grave as we speak.

http://www.psychologicalscience.org/onlyhuman/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miguel,<br />
Try this link - go to the bottom of the page.  It was written in January, well before April fools day.  You guys know its conclusions are correct.  That was why we were given a candidate by your party whom the average citizen would want to have a beer with.  What a sad mire of dumbness your party has become.  I am sure Lincoln is turning over in his grave as we speak.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.psychologicalscience.org/onlyhuman/" rel="nofollow">http://www.psychologicalscience.org/onlyhuman/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329512</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329512</guid>
		<description>"Was one sawed-off shot gun worthy of an entire squad of FBI agents, swarming one house with helicopters to enforce one gun violation? Even though Weaver hadn’t harmed anyone with that shotgun before?"

No, the warrant was for failure to appear and Weaver had been noted for saying that he would not be taken
alive.

Why didn't he just show up at court for his required appearance?

Easy right? No dead bodies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Was one sawed-off shot gun worthy of an entire squad of FBI agents, swarming one house with helicopters to enforce one gun violation? Even though Weaver hadn’t harmed anyone with that shotgun before?&#8221;</p>
<p>No, the warrant was for failure to appear and Weaver had been noted for saying that he would not be taken<br />
alive.</p>
<p>Why didn&#8217;t he just show up at court for his required appearance?</p>
<p>Easy right? No dead bodies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329511</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329511</guid>
		<description>"And Vicki Weaver was shot while holding her baby."

Yes, she was - why didn't Randy Weaver have her and his children leave the cabin. If he wanted to fight it out, he and Kevin Harris should of had the cajones to do it alone - not with women and children present.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And Vicki Weaver was shot while holding her baby.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, she was - why didn&#8217;t Randy Weaver have her and his children leave the cabin. If he wanted to fight it out, he and Kevin Harris should of had the cajones to do it alone - not with women and children present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329510</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329510</guid>
		<description>"1)You called Israel a terrorist nation based on one incident. By YOUR standards, the US is a terrorist nation based on the 2 FBI incidents I pointed out."

Try to read, Max, that wasn't me.

"2)When the Clinton/Obama gun-banners get their gun confiscation laws passed, there will be not one or two, but thousands of “Weaver” incidents all over America. Clinton/Obama will have to make an “example” out of the first few defenders of the 2nd Amendment. What they don’t understand, is that there will be thousands if not millions of Americans they will have to shoot down, as “examples”."

Nope - banning all guns would be unconstitutional and neither the House nor the Senate would pass such a bill.

Neither Obama or Clinton would sign such a bill.

And the warrant and subsequent missed court date the prompted the incident was because Randy Weaver SOLD two sawed off shotguns to an undercover agent. The FBI was not trying to confiscate weapons.

If he (Weaver) had shown up in court to face the charges, there would have been no incident.

Regardless of what you may feel about them, at the time, shotguns with 14" barrels were illegal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;1)You called Israel a terrorist nation based on one incident. By YOUR standards, the US is a terrorist nation based on the 2 FBI incidents I pointed out.&#8221;</p>
<p>Try to read, Max, that wasn&#8217;t me.</p>
<p>&#8220;2)When the Clinton/Obama gun-banners get their gun confiscation laws passed, there will be not one or two, but thousands of “Weaver” incidents all over America. Clinton/Obama will have to make an “example” out of the first few defenders of the 2nd Amendment. What they don’t understand, is that there will be thousands if not millions of Americans they will have to shoot down, as “examples”.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nope - banning all guns would be unconstitutional and neither the House nor the Senate would pass such a bill.</p>
<p>Neither Obama or Clinton would sign such a bill.</p>
<p>And the warrant and subsequent missed court date the prompted the incident was because Randy Weaver SOLD two sawed off shotguns to an undercover agent. The FBI was not trying to confiscate weapons.</p>
<p>If he (Weaver) had shown up in court to face the charges, there would have been no incident.</p>
<p>Regardless of what you may feel about them, at the time, shotguns with 14&#8243; barrels were illegal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329509</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329509</guid>
		<description>And Vicki Weaver was shot while holding her baby.

Nice Clark.

Very nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Vicki Weaver was shot while holding her baby.</p>
<p>Nice Clark.</p>
<p>Very nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329508</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329508</guid>
		<description>Yeah, after Weaver's son was shot in the back, Weaver defended his family.

Was one sawed-off shot gun worthy of an entire squad of FBI agents, swarming one house with helicopters to enforce one gun violation?  Even though Weaver hadn't harmed anyone with that shotgun before?

Examples.  Thousands more are needed in Clark's world of Big Government. 

The People, must be controlled and made to conform.  Socialism, will take force to implement in America.

You ready to count the bodies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, after Weaver&#8217;s son was shot in the back, Weaver defended his family.</p>
<p>Was one sawed-off shot gun worthy of an entire squad of FBI agents, swarming one house with helicopters to enforce one gun violation?  Even though Weaver hadn&#8217;t harmed anyone with that shotgun before?</p>
<p>Examples.  Thousands more are needed in Clark&#8217;s world of Big Government. </p>
<p>The People, must be controlled and made to conform.  Socialism, will take force to implement in America.</p>
<p>You ready to count the bodies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329506</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329506</guid>
		<description>Clark, you don't even GET the two points I made on this issue.

1)You called Israel a terrorist nation based on one incident.  By YOUR standards, the US is a terrorist nation based on the 2 FBI incidents I pointed out.

2)When the Clinton/Obama gun-banners get their gun confiscation laws passed, there will be not one or two, but thousands of "Weaver" incidents all over America.  Clinton/Obama will have to make an "example" out of the first few defenders of the 2nd Amendment.  What they don't understand, is that there will be thousands if not millions of Americans they will have to shoot down, as "examples".  

Will one of you be the next "example"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clark, you don&#8217;t even GET the two points I made on this issue.</p>
<p>1)You called Israel a terrorist nation based on one incident.  By YOUR standards, the US is a terrorist nation based on the 2 FBI incidents I pointed out.</p>
<p>2)When the Clinton/Obama gun-banners get their gun confiscation laws passed, there will be not one or two, but thousands of &#8220;Weaver&#8221; incidents all over America.  Clinton/Obama will have to make an &#8220;example&#8221; out of the first few defenders of the 2nd Amendment.  What they don&#8217;t understand, is that there will be thousands if not millions of Americans they will have to shoot down, as &#8220;examples&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Will one of you be the next &#8220;example&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSClark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329505</link>
		<dc:creator>WSClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/open-thread-410/#comment-329505</guid>
		<description>"And Weaver wasn’t anywhere near his wife and baby when the FBI shot the baby out of her arms"

No they didn't - they shot Vicki Weaver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And Weaver wasn’t anywhere near his wife and baby when the FBI shot the baby out of her arms&#8221;</p>
<p>No they didn&#8217;t - they shot Vicki Weaver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
