Status: Was true.

“Michelle Obama’s thesis became a matter of controversy (outside of its subject matter) in early 2008 when some interested parties who attempted to retrieve its content were informed by Princeton that access to the thesis had been restricted until after the presidential election in November 2008. Regardless of the reasons behind it, such a restriction naturally engendered suspicion that someone or something (in this case, presumably the Obama campaign itself) had a vested interest in keeping the information from reaching the public, which in turn served to heighten interest in the contents of the thesis.”
It has been release now, forced, by ‘fire control’.

My “quickly” point was only re since you have already carefully read the 1985 thesis, you should be able to “quickly” tell us why we need to get “out in front of” it.

Since you instead switch to a false rant about what I “want”, I will assume that you never read that thesis.

Thank you J R, for proving my point.

“Quickly” is the problem cosmos.

How quickly Obama’s star has risen.

How quickly the media were to fall in love with him and so give him a pass.

How quickly belated exploration as to Obama caused problems.

And how quickly SOME and YOU cosmos seem to want to end the Democratic nomination in favor of your quick candidate.

We are determining the next leader of the free and otherwise world. Let’s not be hasty.

Since you obviously have already carefully read all of Michelle Obama’s 1985 thesis, please quickly tell us why we need to get “out in front of” it.

And if your memory has faded, the thesis is at the politico site, linked at Snopes, above.

I DID try and warn you.

Look, everyone knows I have my problems with Obama. But I won’t attack him here except for what he himself has said.

You and his supporters NEED to get out in front of stuff like James just posted.

And then Michelle Obama went to Harvard Law School, and earned her J.D. degree in 1988.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/thesis.asp

Boxlock, how many HLS graduates have served on the SCOTUS?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvard_Law_School#Notable_alumni

And Mitt Romney?

The thesis provides a trove of Mrs. Obama’s thoughts and world view seen through a race-based prism.
This is a very divisive view for a potential first lady that would do untold damage to race relations in this country in a Barack Obama administration.

Michelle Obama’s intellectually refined racism should give all Americans pause for deep concern.

That seems to happen to stories that prompt questions as to Obama.

It was in the same debate in which Senator Clinton got Obama to distance himself from someone or other. ALSO the same debate when Sentor Clinton got Obama to modify his sentiment that “Republicans are the party of ideas” with the qualifier that those were BAD ideas.

The subject was health care. Senator Obama said words to the effect that parents not able to buy health insurance under “his plan” would be at fault somehow.

Anyway’s, I am TRYING to help the party first and Obama second. He has negatives. I won’t delve into them. But his supporters SHOULD get out in front of them early rather than late.

I don’t consider stating the facts to be an “insult”.

If you believe that your past rants at Senator Obama (like buying childrens health insurance, etc) were valid, then post your proof.

If I’m wrong, I will apologize.

I won’t insult you as you do me cosmos. I just ask you to research your own candidate.

Good night.

Much of what the “right is circulating” is invalid… and that’s probably why the “media is not reporting” it.

And considering your angry rants toward Senator Obama, like when you misunderstood his child health insurance statement, I can’t consider you to be a credible, unbiased source.

I already tried to.

In a caucus that was Obama biased.

And presumably you cosmos voted for your candidate.

So we fence here and it matters who knows how much.

I tell you that Obama has been given a pass. I only ask of you to explore the facts.

If you only say “ideas”, without a modifier, then you are NOT saying that the “ideas” were “better”, or “good”, as the Clinton’s incorrectly claimed.

If you cannot understand that, then vote for Clinton.

I LIKE to think that as to this well read blog we each of us make more of a difference.

Scuttlebutt says that Senator Clinton’s frustration with Governor Richardson’s endorsement of Senator Obama centers on the belief that Obama is not electable.

It’s out there. It’s not my call.

But I do know things that the right is circulating and that the media is not reporting.

And do those things make Senator Obama unelectable? I cannot say.

Please appreciate the position of this supporter of Senator Clinton for fear of no better. The record shows she was not my first choice.

I did not make Obama say the things he has said.

Obama supporters should do their own research and get out in front of the damage to him that lurks. He is not my candidate. It is not my job.

Not sure what to say, Steven. It doesn’t look like he broke any rules getting it. Of course is raises concerns that what’s left of this contest will be determined by a lopsided blitz of 30-second ads, but I’m not sure there’s anything that can be done about that.

At least it’s been a real contest so far, and we’ll see what happens in Pennsylvia etc.

It was Senator Clinton got your candidate to restate his position. As to “ideas”?

IF it is his position.

The media is giving Obama a pass. I know more.

I’ll not bring it here. Not yet.

I have already done my research. Have you?

Is “idea” without a modifier defined as “better idea”?

Get out in front of his negatives that are not reported. We cannot afford to have them come out later.

Also, is the comment there that Hillary is charging her campaign interest on her $5 million loan true? Is she making a personal profit from her campaign activities?

“… let’s first make sure we elect the person who is qualified to be our president in a nuclear age during a global civilizational war.”

Like McCain, who sings(sic) bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran. And who incorrectly believed that Iran was training AQ.

Or Clinton, who trusted Bush, and voted ‘yea’ on the AUMF. And has exaggerated her role on foreign policy issues.

I can’t help hearing about Obama. I sure wish he had something to say that I WANT to hear.

Small non-random samples are a greater problem.

I understood your point, “among those I know”, before I made my post at 4:21 pm.

Small sample sizes are usually not very accurate.