<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mileyâ€™s shot a bit too revealing for G rating</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: kangarooprincess</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-340429</link>
		<dc:creator>kangarooprincess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 13:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-340429</guid>
		<description>And what about Jamie Lynn?  After this season, Zoey 101 will be cancelled and now she is on Miss Guided.  No, it isn't Disney, but she was still supposed to be the breath of fresh G-rated air in opposition to Britney.  Now she isn't, in my opinion, any better than her sister.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what about Jamie Lynn?  After this season, Zoey 101 will be cancelled and now she is on Miss Guided.  No, it isn&#8217;t Disney, but she was still supposed to be the breath of fresh G-rated air in opposition to Britney.  Now she isn&#8217;t, in my opinion, any better than her sister.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kangarooprincess</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-340422</link>
		<dc:creator>kangarooprincess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 13:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-340422</guid>
		<description>I honestly think Disney is overreacting.  Miley should not shy away from the spotlight because of the photo.  They didn't do that to Vanessa.  She had full frontal nudity.  This is just her back, but yes, I agree she is too young for that photo, and I blame Annie, not Miley.  I didn't like Britney Spears from the start, but when she "grew" up, I had made my mind up that she was never going to be a role model for my future daughters.  Miley will be.  At least she apologized for the uproar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly think Disney is overreacting.  Miley should not shy away from the spotlight because of the photo.  They didn&#8217;t do that to Vanessa.  She had full frontal nudity.  This is just her back, but yes, I agree she is too young for that photo, and I blame Annie, not Miley.  I didn&#8217;t like Britney Spears from the start, but when she &#8220;grew&#8221; up, I had made my mind up that she was never going to be a role model for my future daughters.  Miley will be.  At least she apologized for the uproar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-340198</link>
		<dc:creator>bth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-340198</guid>
		<description>Mary - agreed pretty much on all counts.  No more skin is shown than I would see with a kid swimming in the pool.  It is the sexualizing at thta early age that troubles me.  

That same pose in a 20-year-old might be appropriate but not a 15 ear old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary - agreed pretty much on all counts.  No more skin is shown than I would see with a kid swimming in the pool.  It is the sexualizing at thta early age that troubles me.  </p>
<p>That same pose in a 20-year-old might be appropriate but not a 15 ear old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary_Caruso</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-340193</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary_Caruso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-340193</guid>
		<description>None of you get the point...too bad. 
I have nothing against nudity at all at any age, there is nothing more beautiful than a naked baby..I just believe it is immoral to sexualize a child for commercial purposes, and I doubt if this picture was Miley's idea. The apathy about manipulating a child in this way is disgusting and a big part of what's wrong with our culture. No wonder child porn is such a hot commodity these days...too many people saying "oh well, that's just how it is"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>None of you get the point&#8230;too bad.<br />
I have nothing against nudity at all at any age, there is nothing more beautiful than a naked baby..I just believe it is immoral to sexualize a child for commercial purposes, and I doubt if this picture was Miley&#8217;s idea. The apathy about manipulating a child in this way is disgusting and a big part of what&#8217;s wrong with our culture. No wonder child porn is such a hot commodity these days&#8230;too many people saying &#8220;oh well, that&#8217;s just how it is&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kangarooprincess</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339994</link>
		<dc:creator>kangarooprincess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 19:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339994</guid>
		<description>It is just a photo, and others have done worse and their careers are ok.  I saw an episode of Samatha Who the other night and she went to her ex's gallery showing of his photographs.  It was quite racy, her covering her breast with her hand, and clearly not wearing anything else.  He was praised for it's "artistic" view, but her father was not happy.  That is different because she was an adult, but Miley isn't 5 and posing like that.  But Miley is embarassed, so that settles it.  If the subject isn't happy with it, than it was wrong, but it is still just a photo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is just a photo, and others have done worse and their careers are ok.  I saw an episode of Samatha Who the other night and she went to her ex&#8217;s gallery showing of his photographs.  It was quite racy, her covering her breast with her hand, and clearly not wearing anything else.  He was praised for it&#8217;s &#8220;artistic&#8221; view, but her father was not happy.  That is different because she was an adult, but Miley isn&#8217;t 5 and posing like that.  But Miley is embarassed, so that settles it.  If the subject isn&#8217;t happy with it, than it was wrong, but it is still just a photo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339726</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 10:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339726</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I also managed to mangle the artist's name- The painting by Marcel DuChamp is titled "Nude Descending Staircase#2" It was exhibited in the landmark 1913 Armory Show in Philadelphia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I also managed to mangle the artist&#8217;s name- The painting by Marcel DuChamp is titled &#8220;Nude Descending Staircase#2&#8243; It was exhibited in the landmark 1913 Armory Show in Philadelphia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339725</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 10:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339725</guid>
		<description>Let's try that link again:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nude_Descending_a_Staircase,_No._2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s try that link again:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nude_Descending_a_Staircase,_No._2" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nude_Descending_a_Staircase,_No._2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339724</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 09:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339724</guid>
		<description>Mary,
Probably because I misspent such a large part of my youth in life drawing classes sketching nude models, I find very little sexualizing of Miley in the photos so far published. I've certainly seem far worse!
What I have seen is that until the level of hard porn is reached, most of the sexuality in a given image is in the viewer's mind. And when that mind is in the head of a preacher who makes a good living rooting out immorality even where none exists, he's bound to find quite a bit.I can't help but laugh out loud at how badly some of the work is distorted in ways that are designed to fill that plate come Sunday! 
One of the true classics was when Anthony Comstock (the Jerry Falwell of his day) summoned the sheriff to confiscate a blatently pornographic painting entitled "Nude Descending Staircase" by Marcel Duhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nude_Descending_a_Staircase,_No._2champ  
And of course it was painted by a Frenchman; how sexual that must be!
The photograph of Miley probably should not have been done for artistic reasons- It's already been done way too many times to claim any kind of originality- but there are no reasons for claiming it to be immoral, other than the generation of a bit more clink on the old collection plate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary,<br />
Probably because I misspent such a large part of my youth in life drawing classes sketching nude models, I find very little sexualizing of Miley in the photos so far published. I&#8217;ve certainly seem far worse!<br />
What I have seen is that until the level of hard porn is reached, most of the sexuality in a given image is in the viewer&#8217;s mind. And when that mind is in the head of a preacher who makes a good living rooting out immorality even where none exists, he&#8217;s bound to find quite a bit.I can&#8217;t help but laugh out loud at how badly some of the work is distorted in ways that are designed to fill that plate come Sunday!<br />
One of the true classics was when Anthony Comstock (the Jerry Falwell of his day) summoned the sheriff to confiscate a blatently pornographic painting entitled &#8220;Nude Descending Staircase&#8221; by Marcel Duhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nude_Descending_a_Staircase,_No._2champ<br />
And of course it was painted by a Frenchman; how sexual that must be!<br />
The photograph of Miley probably should not have been done for artistic reasons- It&#8217;s already been done way too many times to claim any kind of originality- but there are no reasons for claiming it to be immoral, other than the generation of a bit more clink on the old collection plate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political_mama</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339640</link>
		<dc:creator>Political_mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 02:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339640</guid>
		<description>Wait a minute Mary, I am a feminist and I despise the sexualization of women like you are claiming.  Again, I see nothing wrong with this image.  

Some women do like the attention they get from feeling beautiful, I find nothing wrong with that.  Just as I think its fun to go with my friends to watch the guys strip, I don't feel like they're degrading themselves.  


Think about it, wouldn't it be great if a woman chose to wear something skimpy in Afghanistan that she wouldn't get stoned to death for turning on men?  HOw liberated are the FLDS women in their long dresses down to their ankles and having sex fully clothed?  Does that stop men from demoralizing them there?

There is no shame in being beautiful, and there should be nothing SEXUAL about being beautiful.

Tell me, if that was a 40 year old, 300 lb woman, would you still have the opinion that it was a come do me pic?  Or would it look rather like she just got off the gyno table?

A women's liberation should come from being able to walk around and not be leered at PERIOD.  But rather, be seen for the beauty that she possesses at all ages, weights, sizes of life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a minute Mary, I am a feminist and I despise the sexualization of women like you are claiming.  Again, I see nothing wrong with this image.  </p>
<p>Some women do like the attention they get from feeling beautiful, I find nothing wrong with that.  Just as I think its fun to go with my friends to watch the guys strip, I don&#8217;t feel like they&#8217;re degrading themselves.  </p>
<p>Think about it, wouldn&#8217;t it be great if a woman chose to wear something skimpy in Afghanistan that she wouldn&#8217;t get stoned to death for turning on men?  HOw liberated are the FLDS women in their long dresses down to their ankles and having sex fully clothed?  Does that stop men from demoralizing them there?</p>
<p>There is no shame in being beautiful, and there should be nothing SEXUAL about being beautiful.</p>
<p>Tell me, if that was a 40 year old, 300 lb woman, would you still have the opinion that it was a come do me pic?  Or would it look rather like she just got off the gyno table?</p>
<p>A women&#8217;s liberation should come from being able to walk around and not be leered at PERIOD.  But rather, be seen for the beauty that she possesses at all ages, weights, sizes of life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueJay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339635</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339635</guid>
		<description>I'm not saying it's "right" or anything Mary. And I agree with a lot of your points.

    It just is what it is. This gal will have it a  lot better than some waitress or barmaid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s &#8220;right&#8221; or anything Mary. And I agree with a lot of your points.</p>
<p>    It just is what it is. This gal will have it a  lot better than some waitress or barmaid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary_Caruso</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339629</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary_Caruso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339629</guid>
		<description>I'm really hurting right now, I had a long day at work and I need a hot bath and my bed...I'll catch up with ya all tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really hurting right now, I had a long day at work and I need a hot bath and my bed&#8230;I&#8217;ll catch up with ya all tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary_Caruso</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339628</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary_Caruso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339628</guid>
		<description>"What we see here is Miley’s and her parets attempt to carry her career in singing and acting out of her teen years. Yeah they are getting started a little early."

Again, why is it so important or necessary for a woman to be sexual in order to be succesful? 
Doesn't say much for her real worth, does it? Does she have no worth except as an object for male sexual gratification? I think that's how today's pop culture views women, and it's hurting our young women and girls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What we see here is Miley’s and her parets attempt to carry her career in singing and acting out of her teen years. Yeah they are getting started a little early.&#8221;</p>
<p>Again, why is it so important or necessary for a woman to be sexual in order to be succesful?<br />
Doesn&#8217;t say much for her real worth, does it? Does she have no worth except as an object for male sexual gratification? I think that&#8217;s how today&#8217;s pop culture views women, and it&#8217;s hurting our young women and girls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary_Caruso</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339621</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary_Caruso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339621</guid>
		<description>I hate the idea that our culture teaches young girls that in order to beautiful, they have to be sexual. It's just plain wrong. A woman shouldn't have to be sexualized in order to be considered beautiful. Why do you think there are so many girls dressing like streetwalkers and starving themselves to be skinny? It's because of this stupid body image that is impossible to achieve but they are encouraged to feel worthless unless they can achieve it. Most women don't look like Barbie..and whatever happened to the idea that INNER beauty was more important than looking like something out of Playboy? 
I miss the early days of the women's movement when women were striving for self respect, independance, and self worth...not judging themselves by how attractive they were to the opposite sex. Somewhere, somehow we've lost our way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate the idea that our culture teaches young girls that in order to beautiful, they have to be sexual. It&#8217;s just plain wrong. A woman shouldn&#8217;t have to be sexualized in order to be considered beautiful. Why do you think there are so many girls dressing like streetwalkers and starving themselves to be skinny? It&#8217;s because of this stupid body image that is impossible to achieve but they are encouraged to feel worthless unless they can achieve it. Most women don&#8217;t look like Barbie..and whatever happened to the idea that INNER beauty was more important than looking like something out of Playboy?<br />
I miss the early days of the women&#8217;s movement when women were striving for self respect, independance, and self worth&#8230;not judging themselves by how attractive they were to the opposite sex. Somewhere, somehow we&#8217;ve lost our way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueJay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339620</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339620</guid>
		<description>Oops.

   Posted my first and the slight correction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops.</p>
<p>   Posted my first and the slight correction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueJay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339618</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339618</guid>
		<description>She is just trying not to be the next Amanda Bynes.

    Amanda Bynes was a big star on Nickelodeon. Then she grew up.

   She still gets roles. But it aint a patch to what her career was.

    What we see here is Miley's and her parets attempt to carry her career in singing and acting out of her teen years. Yeah they are getting started a little early. But like I say, the Disney show she is in has racier stuff than this photo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She is just trying not to be the next Amanda Bynes.</p>
<p>    Amanda Bynes was a big star on Nickelodeon. Then she grew up.</p>
<p>   She still gets roles. But it aint a patch to what her career was.</p>
<p>    What we see here is Miley&#8217;s and her parets attempt to carry her career in singing and acting out of her teen years. Yeah they are getting started a little early. But like I say, the Disney show she is in has racier stuff than this photo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueJay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339617</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339617</guid>
		<description>She is just trying not to be the next Amanda Bynes.

    Amanda Bynes was a big star on Nickelodeon. Then she grew up.

   She still gets roles. But it aint a patch to what her career was.

    What we see here is Miley's and her parets attempt to carry her career in singing and acting out of her teen years. Yeah they are getting started a little early. But like I say, the Nickelodeon show she is in has racier stuff than this photo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She is just trying not to be the next Amanda Bynes.</p>
<p>    Amanda Bynes was a big star on Nickelodeon. Then she grew up.</p>
<p>   She still gets roles. But it aint a patch to what her career was.</p>
<p>    What we see here is Miley&#8217;s and her parets attempt to carry her career in singing and acting out of her teen years. Yeah they are getting started a little early. But like I say, the Nickelodeon show she is in has racier stuff than this photo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary_Caruso</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339616</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary_Caruso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339616</guid>
		<description>I do too, but I think it's inappropriate because of her age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do too, but I think it&#8217;s inappropriate because of her age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary_Caruso</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339615</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary_Caruso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339615</guid>
		<description>Right...if you've seen the image, it's pretty apparent what the message is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right&#8230;if you&#8217;ve seen the image, it&#8217;s pretty apparent what the message is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political_mama</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339614</link>
		<dc:creator>Political_mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339614</guid>
		<description>I think the image is really beautiful actually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the image is really beautiful actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political_mama</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339611</link>
		<dc:creator>Political_mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339611</guid>
		<description>it’s the message or intention behind the image…"

that just proved my point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it’s the message or intention behind the image…&#8221;</p>
<p>that just proved my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary_Caruso</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339607</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary_Caruso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339607</guid>
		<description>Think about it, PMom...it's the message or intention behind the image....there is a difference between a picture of a young girl wearing a swimsuit at a pool and another image of a young girl who is topless with a satin sheet draped over her and "the look" in her eyes. One image isn't sexual, the other is.
That sort of image is fine for a young women in her 20s...but not for a 15 yr old child.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think about it, PMom&#8230;it&#8217;s the message or intention behind the image&#8230;.there is a difference between a picture of a young girl wearing a swimsuit at a pool and another image of a young girl who is topless with a satin sheet draped over her and &#8220;the look&#8221; in her eyes. One image isn&#8217;t sexual, the other is.<br />
That sort of image is fine for a young women in her 20s&#8230;but not for a 15 yr old child.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political_mama</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339603</link>
		<dc:creator>Political_mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339603</guid>
		<description>Tell me what is so sexual about that photo Mary because I don't see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell me what is so sexual about that photo Mary because I don&#8217;t see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary_Caruso</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339600</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary_Caruso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339600</guid>
		<description>American pop culture needs to quit sexualizing kids...Our country has become a pedophile's dream. There is nothing wrong with encouraging kids to stay innocent and it's wrong for young girls to base their self image on their sexuality when they should be developing a sense of self respect and healthy boundries.
I'm sick and tired of seeing women and children exploited for the sake of male sexual gratification.
Where the hell is the outrage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American pop culture needs to quit sexualizing kids&#8230;Our country has become a pedophile&#8217;s dream. There is nothing wrong with encouraging kids to stay innocent and it&#8217;s wrong for young girls to base their self image on their sexuality when they should be developing a sense of self respect and healthy boundries.<br />
I&#8217;m sick and tired of seeing women and children exploited for the sake of male sexual gratification.<br />
Where the hell is the outrage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political_mama</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339540</link>
		<dc:creator>Political_mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339540</guid>
		<description>Must be hard being so sexually repressed all the time.  Seriously. I'm glad I'm not religious.

I had someone chastize me for pictures, one a picture of when my daughter was about 12, my hubby took her out to do test shots, and she's leaning back against a tree, fully clothed, with her arms across her chest.  Someone saw that and said "oh my god you let your husband take photos of her like that".  I said..like what?  Because she was reclining against the tree, someone thought that she looked like she was trusting her pelvis towards him suggestively.  WTFE.

I will say this though.  I had a picture of my son up on a profile picture shirtless, he was all of about 5 months old.  and I had some guy message me for child porn.  I was never so disgusted in all my life.  And I did reverse lookups on his ID, reported him to the KBI...and I don't know if they ever caught this guy but I sure hope they did.  He told me that he didn't get to look at his daughter's breasts since she had gone off to college ICK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must be hard being so sexually repressed all the time.  Seriously. I&#8217;m glad I&#8217;m not religious.</p>
<p>I had someone chastize me for pictures, one a picture of when my daughter was about 12, my hubby took her out to do test shots, and she&#8217;s leaning back against a tree, fully clothed, with her arms across her chest.  Someone saw that and said &#8220;oh my god you let your husband take photos of her like that&#8221;.  I said..like what?  Because she was reclining against the tree, someone thought that she looked like she was trusting her pelvis towards him suggestively.  WTFE.</p>
<p>I will say this though.  I had a picture of my son up on a profile picture shirtless, he was all of about 5 months old.  and I had some guy message me for child porn.  I was never so disgusted in all my life.  And I did reverse lookups on his ID, reported him to the KBI&#8230;and I don&#8217;t know if they ever caught this guy but I sure hope they did.  He told me that he didn&#8217;t get to look at his daughter&#8217;s breasts since she had gone off to college ICK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CapnAmerica</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339513</link>
		<dc:creator>CapnAmerica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2008/04/miley%e2%80%99s-shot-a-bit-too-revealing-for-g-rating/#comment-339513</guid>
		<description>When I lived overseas in a Muslim country, our TIME and NEWSWEEK magazines would arrive with every picture of a woman who wasn't fully clothed defaced with a black magic marker.

I wondered what kind of a person could take pride in a job that was the very embodiment of philistinism.

Now I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I lived overseas in a Muslim country, our TIME and NEWSWEEK magazines would arrive with every picture of a woman who wasn&#8217;t fully clothed defaced with a black magic marker.</p>
<p>I wondered what kind of a person could take pride in a job that was the very embodiment of philistinism.</p>
<p>Now I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
