What numbers have I posted here that are wrong?

Please cite this CDC study of yours?

Yes, I know all about John Hopkins. They have an anti-gun agenda and are out to prove it.

When are you going to come over and watch Bowling for Columbine with me so I can point out all the editing tricks that Moore used and you bought hook line and sinker?

Why yes they do Nathan.

That is exactly what I am perceiving when I read GMC, Heckler, or you.

“You can show absolutely no correlation between more guns = more gun death beyond the most simple comparison of another country to ours excluding every other factor which could be involved except for numbers of guns.”

It’s not me making the correlation, Nathan, it’s the experts at the CDC and John Hopkins who have studied the issue.
I do have to laugh that when you boast that you only consider facts when making an argument to support your opinions…don’t you believe that the earth is only 8-10 thousand years old? I know that’s off the subject, but is is indicative of your twisted ideas that are not based at all on facts.

They do for me.

JR mentions it six times. People at the meet up laughed at GMC. JR made them laugh at GMC. It must have been the highlight of the evening for JR.

What’s that say? Any doctors in the audience?

I don’t imagine you will see another.

Because of the posts of you and your own?

I work for me. SO I’m up late.

Butler county better really consider your employment. I think I’ll look into that in an advisory capacity.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-oped0424chapmanapr24,0,5976650.column

A sample:

“When a rash of gun murders takes place, it makes sense for the police to do one of two things: renew tactics that have been effective in the past at curbing homicides, or embrace ideas that have not been tried before. But those options don’t appeal to Chicago Police Supt. Jody Weis. What he proposes instead is a crackdown on assault weapons.

I’m tempted to say this is the moral equivalent of a placebo—a sugar pill that is irrelevant to the malady at hand. But that would be unfair. Placebos, after all, sometimes have a positive effect. Assault weapons bans, not so much.”
—
Read the rest for yourself. And read the comments. The tide is turning, and people are beginning to wake up. When the SCOTUS finishes with the DC ban in June, as I expect they will, Chicago’s ban will likely be next in the crosshairs of the Constitution.

And the good citizens of Chicago will be better off for it.

And yes, JR, the answer is delusional. Get help.

SSDD

HE remembers you.

As the fat balding guy who I made everyone laugh at.

Let me help.

You were in the row behind me. I asked if you would be following me around here as you do on the blog.

Room laughter.

I opined that “Great, I’ve got two lawyers sitting behind me.”
Again room laughter.

MY memory? Steven was sitting next to me. Outlander was at the door. YOU were seated behind me with Vaughn.

That about right?

That is what I remember. Now - the only question is whether you are delusional or just dishonest?

Yes, I do remember. You clearly do not.

Was it because I made everyone there laugh at you?

YOU remember.

I asked you loudly if you were gonna follow me around at the meetup like you always have on the blog?

And they all laughed at you.

As to humorless - let’s look back over this very thread and see who lacks humor. Let’s see . . . that would be you, sir.

Let’s see who is the pompous self-important blowhard. Shall we read up on past postings? That, again, would be you, sir. Yes, we’ve met. And you are just as self-aggrandizing and pompous in person. You are, after all, the Great JR: Savior of the Blog.

Just ask him, he’ll tell you.

I’ve already noted your sexual issues are your own; only you raise that. Apparantly there are deeper issues there - care to share?

My concern for you is genuine, but I have greater concern for your son. It’s a shame to see anyone suffer, but you’ve reveled in hate for so long, I frankly think it’s effecting you. I have little doubt it is observed by your son, and it’s not healthy. I’m certain those around you see it. Get help.

I’ve met GMC. He is as he posts. A humorless blusterer. I shoulda took a pin to that meetup!

I DO mean what I say.

We ARE moving toward a place and time when the have nots are gonna have had enough. It takes no more than a simple review of history to predict the result.

And as to concern for me? Now you’ve moderated a bit. But I can dig up posts where you were clearly pounding the desk and foaming at the mouth. Vowing to leave this “left wing circle jerk” (your words.) never to return ONLY to return and blow up again.

Heckler suffers from a brown nose. You have trouble with an oversized head and a fetish for guns that makes one wax Freudian about its basis.

It must be that reading comprehension thing again.

Yeesh.

Au contraire mon frier! You’d better try your link again, it returns ONLY to the VPC’s ’scholarship.’ And it includes no link, or even cite to, any CDC study, only a vague reference that the numbers came from the CDC.

This is too easy.

“Would you like to comment on the ‘real’ CDC’s ‘real’ study?”

Hell. I CITED the CDS’s study with my original link!

Does this kind of logic actually work for you in your job as a government lackey?

Really…

??
Shouldn’t it be ” Liars, damn lawyers, & staticians”?

Makes a lot more sense.

What part of the noun “state” do you not understand?

Wow - It’s apparant MH didn’t pass reading comprehension. Would you like to comment on the ‘real’ CDC’s ‘real’ study?

No?

Didn’t think so.

Complete gun ban Washington DC leads the nation in per capita gun deaths.

Of course, the VPC didn’t add them into their little chart. Wouldn’t be part of their anti-gun agenda to do that.