Let Wichita vote on smoking ban, too

smoking22.jpgWichita’s clean-air ordinance was once forecast to pass the City Council before the end of 2007. Council members reluctant to take a stand on the contentious issue should take a cue from Kansas City, Mo., where voters Tuesday gave smoke-free workplaces, including restaurants and bars, their 52 to 48 percent approval. The ban begins in 60 days. “This was citizen-led. This wasn’t government-sponsored,” observed Cathy Jolly, a Kansas City councilwoman and cancer survivor. Why not put Wichita’s ban — preferably a clean, rather than convoluted, clean-air ordinance — on the November ballot?

34 Comments

  1. fleettwood
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 11:58 am | Permalink

    Let’s vote! That’s a great idea.
    Then, when the anti-freedom of choice anti-smoking crowd finds they will lose, we can re-schedule the vote until they get the votes. Good idea!

  2. Wiseman
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 12:22 pm | Permalink

    Illegal immigrants come into this country breaking our laws and nothing is done about it.
    So if they are allow breaking our laws then smokers have a right to break laws on smoking.
    Besides, I would to see how they are going to enforce that law in a biker’s bar.

  3. Wiseman
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 12:24 pm | Permalink

    Well I missed a word…
    Besides, I would “like” to see how they are going to enforce that law in a biker’s bar.

  4. rivercity
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 2:09 pm | Permalink

    Don’t worry the city council will follow with a vote.

    The city council is a monkey see monkey type of council.

    So now that they have seen how it is done they will do it.

  5. Econ101
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 2:15 pm | Permalink

    I don’t smoke.

    However, I can not stand the busy bodies who want to tell others what to do.

    How about places like “Mort’s Cigar Bar” ???

    If there was a market for clubs and restaurants that don’t allow smoking, we would have more of such places.

    A large number of the people who support these mandatory rules never go to the establishments that they complain about, and will continue to avoid such clubs in the future, even with these stupid smoking bans.

  6. lindainks55
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 2:36 pm | Permalink

    I agree with Econ! Mark this down, Paul.

    I also don’t smoke and there are places I don’t stay very long and I don’t return to because the smoke is that bad. There are other places I go to often and they have excellent ventilation systems that handle the smoke. Then there a totally different number of places I wouldn’t take my grandchildren. But I choose just as everyone should choose where they go and where they spend their money.

  7. Regular
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 2:55 pm | Permalink

    Smokeless cigarettes appear to be in order here. Or, there is chewing tobacco – make shift spittoons every where, waiting to be kicked over. :)

  8. Political_mama
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 4:48 pm | Permalink

    Freedom isn’t free, perhaps we should declare war on ourselves. I’m going to make sure to harass all the drinkers out there with all sorts of bans.

    Ban the drinks, ban the smoking, ban fatty foods, and the box in your house will tell you when to exercise too.

  9. Political_mama
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 4:50 pm | Permalink

    Oh and cough syrup, that’s up next since the kids are drinking whole bottles of it to get high.

    Yippee. How about we stop banning everything? Lets try that and see how it works.

  10. J R
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 6:07 pm | Permalink

    I DO smoke and I am not rude about it.

    UNLESS someone is rude to me first.

    Look I wish I didn’t smoke. If my kid ever starts I’ll make him eat a whole damn pack of the things.

    But ENOUGH with trying to exile smokers the the dark side of the Moon already!

    Sheesh it was inculcated into our culture for more than half a century. The tobacco companies gave away cigarrettes the military to hook a whole generation.

    If my smoking bothers you? If it makes you feel unwell or your kid have an asthma attack? Just say so nicely.

    But the folks out there who just want somebody to persecute? I don’t know how ya deal with them.

  11. Posted April 9, 2008 at 7:26 pm | Permalink

    Boy o boy o boy. Every time I see a controversial issue being put up to a public vote, I thank God Kansas does not have “Voter Initiative”. For those of you who slept through Government class in High School, let me remind you that we have a “representative republic” form of government. We elect representatives to legislate for us. Direct democracy was an anathema to our Founding Fathers who considered it as a transitory form of Government that is always followed by a tyrannical dictatorship. Unfortunately, far too many of our legislatures and city council people are more than happy to shirk their obligations and put controversial issues up to a public vote.
    I do take heart in the fact that the KC vote was so close. It tells me that many people, including many non smokers are not buying in to all this crap about second hand smoke and so called public health concerns trumping a business owners right to run his or her business as they see fit. But even if the vote had gone the other way and the ban had failed, I would still have been opposed to their having a public vote.

  12. Mary Caruso
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 7:56 pm | Permalink

    Second hand smoke causes everything from asthma attacks to allergic reactions in non smokers…you can’t compare it to drinking alcohol or eating fast foods..that bad behavior only physically affects the person consuming the alcohol or big mac…not everyone around them.
    How selfish can you be? Isn’t it bad enough that $93,000,000.00 dollars a year is wasted in Kansas treating smoking related illnesses? It’s such a preventable health hazard…but I guess satisfying your addiction is more important to you than your life or what’s best for everyone around you that you selfishly expose your poisons too.
    The good news is that 70% of people don’t smoke and most of them want the ban…it will easily pass if put on the ballot. I’m really looking forward to the day when I can go to my favorite restaurant and not have to put up with that nasty, smelly, sickening cigarette smoke.

  13. Mary Caruso
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 8:00 pm | Permalink

    “It tells me that many people, including many non smokers are not buying in to all this crap about second hand smoke and so called public health concerns”.
    Chris..there isn’t a doctor in town who would agree with that statement. Only someone who is in serious denial or totally ignorant would believe that second hand smoke doesn’t cause health problems. It’s been proven over and over that people who get exposed to second hand smoke suffer because of it.

  14. Posted April 9, 2008 at 8:04 pm | Permalink

    I am an off again on again smoker – it is the most disgusting habit in the world. It sucks. Cigarettes over the last ten years or so have been laden with even more nicotine than before. They are twice as addictive than they were when I first quit back in the early Nineties.

    It sucks to smoke. It sucks to try to quit. It is a dirty, nasty habit with no redeeming qualities.

  15. J R
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 8:07 pm | Permalink

    Let’s be fair about this Mary.

    YOU are a former smoker. And having tried to quit before, I KNOW you must nearly die for wanting a smoke every time you are near it. I sympathize.

    But it does not entitle you to make me a pariah.

    Ya know? I have a pretty sensitive stomach myself. I don’t know how many over perfumed women or occasionally men who have forced me wretching from their presence. How do we legislate that?

  16. Mary Caruso
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 8:36 pm | Permalink

    JR…believe me I have NO desire to smoke..it literally makes me physically sick to be around it because I’m also allergic to it now. I haven’t smoked for 38 years..and after that much time, no one, especially me, would crave cigarettes.
    I have the right to breath clean air..and you don’t have the right to pollute it.

  17. Political_mama
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 8:48 pm | Permalink

    You also have the right to choose a non smoking establishment.

  18. Political_mama
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 8:50 pm | Permalink

    Germany just had to redact their smoking ban. They had a clause that a restaurant could declare themselves a smoking club. Took so much business from other restaurants that the non smoking restaurants asked for the law to be redacted.

    freedom to choose! It works.

  19. J R
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 8:51 pm | Permalink

    I smoke about a pack and a half a day.

    Now I KNOW that the fact I smoke hangs on me. My kid tells me his friends can tell he lives with a smoker.

    But.

    I’ve met you a couple times Mary. You did not SEEM to have any averse reaction despite standing only a few feet away from me. If you did, you did not say so.

    At the first meetup, I even ASKED if anyone would be bothered if I smoked.

    At the risk of sounding like a conservative?

    Let the market work on this one. IF a business owner chooses to go no smoking fine. I’ll take my self elsewhere. But allow us smokers places of our own.

    Not indicting you Mary, but on the whole?

    The people who are really anal about smoking are just not much fun to be around anyway. I mean really. There was a woman in a park once. Her and her kid were like 20 feet away from me.

    She VERY loudly told her little one, “Don’t go anywhere near that filthy smoker!”

    There’s no excuse for crap like that.

  20. Posted April 9, 2008 at 9:09 pm | Permalink

    This ballot initiative was led and paid for by the American Cancer Society, not ordinary citizens. The ACS and the press fed the voting public very bad information, which is why the law passed. This smoking ban is not a valid law and should be ignored as much as possible.

  21. Steven Davis
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 9:15 pm | Permalink

    I quit smoking on my birthday, 2001. I decided that the habit could kill me.

    Thus the decision was easy. I was uncomfortable the first day, I would have periodic craving every once in a while the first 6 months, but those temporary discomforts passed.

    Quitting was not that difficult for me. Deciding to quit was. But, I’ve never regreted the decision.

    I am glad I quit. My daughter when she was about 4 years old would call me and tell me that some medicine on TV that could help me quit. I am glad that she and I don’t have to worry about that problem any more.

  22. Steven Davis
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 9:18 pm | Permalink

    I used to smoke as much as you, J R.

    You can quit.

    Those cigs are getting real expensive these days.

  23. Steven Davis
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 9:23 pm | Permalink

    In re-reading my 9:15 post; Deciding to quit smoking was difficut and easy. Doing so was easier than deciding to do so. It’s kinda Zen-like really – at least for me, it was.

  24. peacemakergdom
    Posted April 10, 2008 at 1:41 am | Permalink

    Dont bother smokers if you dont like smoke dont go into bars or clubs or CASINO’S that allow smoking, same for eating establishments. And THANK YOU FOR HOLDING YOUR BREATHE WHILE I SMOKE!

  25. Kev
    Posted April 10, 2008 at 5:04 am | Permalink

    Smokers are inconsiderate slobs. They seem to think that they have the right to engage in their addiction anyplace they want and the rest of us be damned if we don’t like it. I was so glad when they finally banned indoor smoking here in Georgia. It is nice to walk into a Waffle House and not have to smell the stench of the addicts. You cannot make stupid people smart and smokers are amongst the dumbest of the dumb. Nobody would actually spend $1000 a year or more killing themselves unless they were dumb. I would never hire a smoker if I ran a business and businesses should be able to say NO to hiring smokers.

  26. RustyFord
    Posted April 10, 2008 at 5:11 am | Permalink

    It would seem to be common sense to let the people of Wichita decide if we want our town to be smoke free or not. Just a clearly worded proposal like “Should all indoor areas commonly open to the public be designated smoke free areas?” and vote on it at the November elections.

    But because it would be common sense to let the people decide generally means it won’t ever happen in this town!

  27. writerdog
    Posted April 10, 2008 at 5:59 am | Permalink

    Each side has their horror stories of encountering an obnoxious person whom did not follow the rule of social interaction. Being a smoker I have had several but one was similar to JR and stick out in my mind.
    Long ago I moved away from the entry doors of any business I and my wife would go to while smoking.
    I was standing at the corner of the building at Dillon’s, when I saw a man and little boy walking from their car. They were parked towards the other end, but the father took his son and made a wide ark so he could walk by me. This had to be his intent as there was nothing that far in my direction.

    As he walked by, he announced to his son “(Cough-cough) SOME PEOPLE ARE SO RUDE!”. I was a good thirty feet from the entry doors and it was not I would was being rude. Until this subject was brought up about a year ago. I was not aware there was any restaurants left in Wichita that even allowed smoking!

    When Felipee’s east went non-smoking I quit going there and even then I would step out side because my wife does not smoke. After they moved to a new location they went back to having a smoking section.
    BUT I didn’t know that because I had not eaten there in over five years and that is my favorite restaurant!
    I do respect someone right not to smoke or be exposed to my smoke, I just wish that others would show as much respect.

  28. lindainks55
    Posted April 10, 2008 at 11:34 am | Permalink

    It’s as easy as hanging a sign on your business.

    Why would there need to be a vote?

    If a smoker quits it’s because they made that decision. I’m not sure it’s something that can be done for someone or because of someone or something. A personal decision.

    I don’t light up now after 5 years because I don’t trust myself to make it through another FIRST SIX MONTHS. Guess that means I recognize my weaknesses. Still sometimes I don’t mind sitting next to someone who is smoking, leaning in and taking a deep breath. :-) The stale smell of butts is stiinky and many people smoking in an unventilated area can be overwhelming and unpleasant, but I can always remove myself or not go in or not stay.

  29. Ben
    Posted April 10, 2008 at 2:05 pm | Permalink

    I tend to agre with Paul and others – to each his own. I would, however, ban smoking in certain places – grocery stores, post offices, etc. As for bars – as long as posted so I know the rules no problem. I go to Players from time to time to watch ball games – smoking is part of the reality. Fortunately Dave has a good air handling system.

    Years ago I saw a design for a smokeless ash tray. It had a small fan that pulled ‘idling’ smoke through a charcoal filter. Add those Purifans to the mix and I think we might be onto a win-win for smoker and non-smoker alike.

  30. Becky
    Posted April 10, 2008 at 3:05 pm | Permalink

    As a citizen of Kansas City, MO and a long time smoker, this ban was coming. One will come to Wichita too, I guarantee it. It’s the wave of the future (or the present, in our case, and the past in many other states).

    I don’t mind it so much. It’s inconvenient, but my family and most of my friends don’t smoke, so going outside is something I’ve done for a long time. I’ve never felt it was my right to smoke and pass the smoke on to others.

    Of course nonsmokers can “go somewhere else” but why should they have to? I have often found myself at the bar of a restaurant with other smokers who are trying to be as considerate as I am by not smoking at the table where nonsmokers are.

    It’s not the end of the world. Just the end of smoking indoors.

    And Bill Hannegan is wrong – it was a citizens’ initiative. Not that it matters, since the ACS, AHA and ALA are not big, nefarious corporate monsters anyway. They promote health.

  31. J R
    Posted April 10, 2008 at 6:44 pm | Permalink

    “The people who are really anal about smoking are just not much fun to be around anyway. ”

    When I said that?

    I was referring to folks like “Kev”.

    Fella? You don’t gotta light up.

    But you might want to lighten up.

    Elsewise you might die from a full blown hissy fit.

  32. Mary_Caruso
    Posted April 11, 2008 at 8:47 pm | Permalink

    “I’ve met you a couple times Mary. You did not SEEM to have any averse reaction despite standing only a few feet away from me. If you did, you did not say so.”

    We were OUTSIDE, JR…if we had been in an enclosed space you’d know I was allergic to it.
    Smokers only make up 30% of the population, and that number is declining…a smoking ban won’t be bad for businesses if they don’t cater to a minority of the population..right now non smokers avoid places without good ventilation..even then it’s still hard to be around it. We’re the majority…businesses will flourish if smoking is banned because then non smokers won’t stay away.

  33. BlueJay
    Posted April 11, 2008 at 9:12 pm | Permalink

    Mary do you forget when we met at Dillon’s?

    I was not more than a few feet from you and indoors. I had smoked during my walk there.

    And the rest of your post?

    Chilling. I mean that.

    Black Americans are not a majority. Neither are gay Americans.

    And neither are pro life Democrats such as yourself.

    I think we want to watch about bending to the will and demands of the majority. Err to tolerance at least?

  34. BlueJay
    Posted April 11, 2008 at 9:13 pm | Permalink

    By the way?

    BlueJay is my new nic.

    Stupid registration would not accomodate J R and I do not need to fuel the JR or junior nonsense.

2 Trackbacks

  1. By Let Wichita vote on smoking ban, too | Smoking on April 9, 2008 at 1:20 pm

    [...] Continue Reading [...]

  2. [...] Rhonda Holman wrote an interesting post today on Let Wichita vote on smoking ban, tooHere’s a quick excerptCouncil members reluctant to take a stand on the contentious issue should take a cue from Kansas City, Mo., where voters Tuesday gave smoke-free workplaces, including restaurants and bars, their 52 to 48 percent approval. … [...]